HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2025 1105 CC REG ITEM 09DCITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of November 5, 2025
ACTION RECEIVED PRESENTATION
AND PROVIDED DIRECTION TO STAFF.
BY A. Hurtado.
D. Consider City Properties and Civic Center Masterplan. Staff Recommendation:
Receive presentation on surplus parcels and Civic Center Masterplan, and provide
direction to staff. (Staff: Jeremy Laurentowski, Parks & Recreation Director)
Item: 9.D.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Jeremy Laurentowski, Parks and Recreation Director
Jessica Sandifer, Deputy Parks and Recreation Director
DATE: 11/05/2025 Regular Meeting
SUBJECT: Consider City Properties and Civic Center Masterplan
BACKGROUND
A city may purchase or receive land or buildings for a variety of different municipal
purposes. There is land needed for operations and city office space, recreational
amenities, road widening, and drainage facilities. Sometimes land is granted to the City
for public purposes due to development agreements, or open space acquisition. When
Redevelopment Agencies were in existence, land was purchased in connection with the
elimination of blight and to provide for economic development opportunities and
affordable housing purposes.
Surplus Land Act Disposition Process
When a local agency, including a city and a successor agency to a redevelopment
agency, determines to “dispose” of a property that is no longer needed for the agency’s
use, the local agency must comply with the Surplus Land Act (SLA) (Government Code
Sections 54220-54234) before the property can be disposed. The SLA defines “dispose”
to mean the sale of surplus land or the entering of a lease for surplus land which is for a
term longer than 15 years. “Dispose” does not include entering into a lease for surplus
land which is for a term of 15 years or less or the entering into a lease for surplus land on
which no development or demolition will occur, regardless of the term of the lease.
“Development” and “demolition” do not include making tenant improvements,
renovations, or updates to an existing building while preserving its structural integrity.
The SLA follows a standard process. First, the land needs to be declared as surplus land
by the City Council or Successor Agency Board with written findings in support (typically
by resolution). The City or Successor Agency must then notify certain designated entities,
including affordable housing developers on a list of interested affordable housing
developers maintained by the State of California Department of Housing and Community
Development (HCD), local school districts, and parks and recreation agencies, that the
parcel is available for sale or lease (Successor Agency properties must be sold, and not
Item: 9.D.
77
Honorable City Council
11/05/2025 Regular Meeting
Page 2
leased). Interested designated entities have 60 days to respond to this Notice of
Availability of their interest in acquiring the property for affordable housing, open-space
purposes, or school facilities construction. An affordable housing developer must agree
to restrict not less than 25% of the total number of units developed on the property for
lower income households. If one or more responses to the Notice of Availability is
received, there is a required good faith negotiation period of at least 90 days with the
interested developer(s). If there is no agreement after the end of the good faith
negotiation period, or no designated entity shows interest in the property, the parcel may
be disposed of to other entities. In such case, a covenant must be recorded against the
property which provides that if 10 or more residential units are developed on the property,
then not less than 15% of the units must be restricted for lower income households. Prior
to finalizing an agreement or disposing of the surplus land, the City or Successor Agency
must submit certain information to HCD so that HCD can determine whether the SLA has
been complied with.
Exempt surplus land is land that meets one or more exemptions set forth in the SLA. For
example, the SLA provides an exemption for surplus land that is less than one-half acre
in size, which is not contiguous to land owned by a state or local agency that is used for
open-space or affordable housing, and is not located in a coastal zone or adjacent to a
historical unit of the State Parks System, or listed on, or determined by the State Office
of Historic Preservation to be eligible for, the National Register of Historic Places. Another
example of exempt surplus land is land that is part of a land swap to acquire other land
for municipal purposes. To start the process to dispose of exempt surplus land, the City
Council or Successor Agency Board must declare the property exempt surplus land with
written findings in support (typically by resolution). In the case of exempt surplus land,
there is no 60- or 90-day period, and the parcel may be disposed of 30 days after the City
or Successor Agency provides its exemption determination to HCD.
Other Procedures
The SLA is just one step in a potential disposition of City property. The City is required
to follow additional processes and satisfy other requirements, as applicable, when
disposing of surplus or exempt surplus land:
• Prior to the disposition of property, the City’s General Plan and Zoning
Ordinance may require amendments to reflect the new and intended use
of the property. Alternately, any changes for the General Plan and Zoning
Map designation of the property could be addressed concurrently during
the disposition process.
• Disposing of City property would also require the Planning Commission to
make a finding that the disposition conforms with the general plan
(Government Code Section 65402).
• The sale or lease of City-owned land may constitute a “project” under CEQA
and may be subject to environmental review under CEQA.
78
Honorable City Council
11/05/2025 Regular Meeting
Page 3
• The sale or lease of City-owned land may require the City to cause the
preparation of Environmental Site Assessment reports to evaluate the
environmental conditions and risks associated with the property prior to the
sale or lease.
• Property used for a park (including the Community Center Park) is subject
to additional procedures and requirements before that park use can be
abandoned and that property can be transferred. The City may need to
enter into an amendment to any applicable park grant agreement and
comply with state laws that may require the City to designate an equal or
greater area of land in the City as park land.
Successor Agency Parcels
Parcels denoted as Successor Housing Agency parcels are ones that used
Redevelopment Housing monies in their initial purchase. These parcels are required to
be used for affordable housing, or sold, with the net proceeds of these sales being placed
in the Successor Housing Agency fund. The Successor Housing Agency fund has
restrictions that are similar to the restrictions during the Redevelopment Agency era. The
funds are to be used for purposes related to construction of new affordable housing units
or the preservation of existing affordable housing, and a percentage of funds can also be
used for homeless housing or prevention, and administrative costs associated with the
housing activities. If one of these parcels were to be retained by the City for anything
other than an affordable housing use, the City would have to pay the appraised value of
the land to the Successor Housing Agency fund.
Bond Funded Parcels
There are three parcels whose purchase was funded with Redevelopment Agency bonds.
These three parcels are located at 467 High Street, 112 First Street, and Princeton
Avenue (APN 513-0-024-105 &-134). When these parcels are sold for a private use, the
net proceeds of the sale of those parcels will be used to defease the outstanding bonds.
Alternatively, the proceeds can be returned to the bond fund and used for eligible projects
provided Bond Counsel concurs and certain conditions are met with respect to the sale
of the property and the use of the proceeds. One of these parcels is also a parcel noted
on the Successor Agency’s Long Range Property Management Plan (LRPMP) from when
the Redevelopment Agency was dissolved. Sale of the LRPMP parcel needs to also be
approved by the Ventura County Consolidated Oversight Board (VCCOB). Similar to the
Successor Housing Agency parcels, if it is determined that this parcel would be better
used by the City for a government use, the City would have to purchase the property from
the Successor Agency for not less than its fair market value. If the Oversight Board and
the California Department of Finance do not object, the proceeds of the sale of the
Successor Agency property can be used for eligible bond projects with Bond Counsel
concurrence as long as certain conditions are met. Otherwise, the proceeds will be used
to defease the bonds.
There are five parcels with an active Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with the
Area Housing Authority of Ventura County (AHAVC). They are located on 112, 124, and
79
Honorable City Council
11/05/2025 Regular Meeting
Page 4
136 First Street and 224 and 236 Charles Street. The ENA is tied to the Pacific
Communities project and the requirement for them to transfer a parcel to the City for a
future affordable housing project. Once the City is transferred the parcel this begins the
ENA timeframe for the AHAVC to design and entitle a scattered sites affordable housing
project on the six sites. If the project is determined infeasible or the ENA is canceled
these parcels would also become available to be disposed of as surplus property, if not
necessary for a City use at that time.
DISCUSSION
The City of Moorpark’s properties typically fit in one of these three categories:
• Purchased for Economic Development/Affordable Housing
• Purchased for Road Widening
• Purchased for City Facility Use
The bulk of the properties that the City owns and that are now available to be disposed
of as surplus land or exempt surplus land were acquired by the Moorpark Redevelopment
Agency (MRA). The MRA would land bank properties for affordable housing projects or
economic development projects. The Walnut Street Apartments, on the corner of
Moorpark Avenue and Everett Street, and Charles Street Terrace Apartments are
examples of projects that were facilitated by the MRA’s land banking activities. The
purchase of the site where the High Street Depot is located was an MRA economic
development site. The remaining properties were purchased to facilitate future road
widening projects. The City’s practice is to purchase strategic parcels for future Capital
Improvement Projects, such as road widening projects, as they become available on the
open market. The land is then held until such time as the projects can be completed.
The purpose of this discussion is to review the various parcels that are not being used by
the City and are available for disposition; review those parcels that will become available
to be disposed of once their intended use is completed; and get City Council input on
what types of partnerships or uses they would like to see on the properties. Staff is also
seeking direction on the Civic Center Campus properties.
Civic Center Master Plan
Over the last several months, the City Council has requested information regarding the
existing Library, as it is scheduled for removal as part of the new Library construction
project. Additionally, the City Council has expressed a desire to evaluate the Civic Center
Master Plan (Master Plan) to confirm that the Master Plan supports current City Council
objectives.
The primary intent of the Master Plan was to substantiate the location for the future City
Library, which had previously been approved by the City Council in 2016. However, the
Master Plan also provided the planning framework for the entire Civic Center campus,
including the location of the future City Hall, and to guide decisions regarding future
development in the Civic Center core area.
80
Honorable City Council
11/05/2025 Regular Meeting
Page 5
The Master Plan identifies areas for private investment and economic development to
facilitate the identification of one or more development partners. The land uses
recommended for the Civic Center site considered surrounding residential and
commercial development, and opportunities for commercial land uses within the Civic
Center area. The City Council ultimately selected Option B in 2020 for the Masterplan.
Option B confirmed the construction of the new Library on the north side of High Street
across from the Post Office. It planned for the future City Hall building to be constructed
where the existing Library is currently located with associated parking for both facilities,
as well as enhanced parking for public use at the north side of the site. Additionally, the
Master Plan proposed to repurpose the Post Office parking lot into a central gathering
place (“Mercado”) to be used for various events, in addition to parking. It also provided
for additional economic activation of High Street to the west and the potential for further
redevelopment of the existing Civic Center site to the north, while contemplating joint use
agreements for parking facilities.
Three Master Plan concepts were considered by the City Council in 2020, and although
each had separate advantages and disadvantages, all considered several primary
components:
• The Master Plan included an 18,000 sq. ft. Library with a future 4,000 sq. ft. Library
expansion to be constructed at a later date. The future expansion was included in
the original approval by the City Council in 2016.
• The Master Plan takes into consideration the Library location that was originally
approved by the City Council in 2016 on the north side of High Street across from
the Post Office. The City Council considered several advantages to this location in
2016 including an easy transition for library patrons, proximity to local schools,
proximity to downtown, maintaining civic uses downtown, activating High Street,
and providing a civic bookend to High Street.
• The Master Plan concept retains the Active Adult Center and Community Center in
their current location and identifies the remaining portion of the site as future
development that would support the downtown area. It was anticipated that joint
use of parking areas and other site features would need to be included in any future
property sale negotiations.
• The Master Plan takes into consideration the approximately six-acre parcel to the
west of the proposed Library that was deeded to the City by Essex Properties (now
Danco Communities). The Master Plan concept includes expanding High Street to
the west and utilizing the property for future commercial, housing, civic, or a
combination of uses, as well as a public park to serve the Library and downtown
residents.
• The Master Plan considered improving the Post Office parking lot to provide for a
gathering place or “Mercado” that could be used as parking for the downtown area
during the week and on weeknights but could also host a farmers’ market or other
81
Honorable City Council
11/05/2025 Regular Meeting
Page 6
events during the weekend. Additionally, an architectural feature was proposed at
the southwest corner of High Street and Moorpark Avenue to welcome visitors
downtown.
• The existing Community Center Park was contemplated for removal due to the
future redevelopment of the existing Civic Center site. In connection with its
removal, additional procedures including amending any applicable park grant
agreement applicable to that park and restricting a comparable amount of City land
for park purposes will need to be undertaken concurrently with the proposed
disposition. In addition, the City may need to seek an amendment to the Civic
Center deed restriction imposed by the County when the property was conveyed to
the City to remove a County easement over the driveways and parking areas of the
Civic Center property.
In June 2025, the City Council adopted City Council Goal 1, Objective 1.4 “Forge
Relationships and Partnerships with Organizations for Community Services,” which
includes exploring opportunities to use the Civic Center site for other uses. If the City
Council reconfirms this Goal and Objective, staff will begin this effort and return to the
City Council in the future to consider proposed partnerships and projects with specific
details on financing, site plans, and uses.
Existing Library
Over the last several months, such as during the City Council meetings to award the
contract for construction of the new library and to consider the Capital Improvement
Program, the City Council requested information regarding the existing Library and asked
staff if the existing library needed to be removed, as well as what impacts and costs would
be associated with keeping the building, considering the current construction of the new
Library.
During the development of the Master Plan in 2019, a conditions assessment report was
completed and included an analysis of the existing buildings within the Civic Center
campus. Although staff was unable to confirm the exact construction date of the existing
Library, as it was built by the County prior to the City’s incorporation, records indicate that
the Library was originally designed in 1980 with a floor area of approximately 2,387
square feet. Subsequent expansions in 1994 and 1996 increased its size to the current
size of 7,800 square feet. The original structure was built to the 1976 Uniform Building
Code (UBC). Subsequent additions would have been built to the 1991 UBC standard and
possibly the 1994 UBC.
According to the 2019 study, the condition of the existing library building is relatively good,
and the structure appears to be sound with no obvious evidence of subsidence,
movement, or cracking. However, the report notes that any change in occupancy or
expansion of the structure would trigger complete code-related upgrades, which could be
challenging. Any alterations needed for the expansion or change of occupancy of the
structure, would need to meet the requirements of the latest California Building Code
(CBC) for renovations and alterations, which might require that the entire structure be
82
Honorable City Council
11/05/2025 Regular Meeting
Page 7
brought up to the latest adopted code. The newer CBC has significantly increased the
requirements for seismic restraint. Because the horizontal force design criteria have
changed since the library was constructed, it would be extremely costly to address the
new design standards.
The report also confirms that the majority of the building systems, i.e. mechanical
($796,586), electrical and lighting ($665,724), and plumbing, including restroom
improvements related to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) ($664,724), have
outlived their useful life and are in need of replacement. Additionally, the roof will need
to be replaced ($777,682), the building will need to be treated for termites ($20,000), and
the windows will need to either be replaced or resealed ($25,000). Staff estimates that it
will cost approximately $2.9 million dollars to replace these systems and deferred
maintenance items. These costs were estimated by the architect hired to design the new
Library, LPA, Inc. (LPA), in 2022 and were submitted in part with the California State
Library Infrastructure Grant application. In addition, the Library is in need of many interior
and exterior upgrades in order to comply with current ADA requirements. In 2018, the
City hired a consultant to prepare a comprehensive ADA Transition Plan for the Civic
Center facilities and determined that it would cost the City over $530,000, not including
the restroom upgrades that were previously noted, to complete the ADA deficiencies
related to the Library.
It should also be noted that the existing Administration Building and Community
Center/Active Adult Center are in overall good condition. The structures are sound and
do not exhibit any sign of structural failure. However, they also will need building systems
replaced and deferred maintenance items completed over the next five to 10 years.
Should the City decide to retain the existing Library and either look for a partner to utilize
the building, or potentially sell the building, the City would need to consider several
deferred maintenance items within the next several years, such as replacing the roof,
treating the building for termites, and potentially resealing the windows. Additionally,
although the building will be vacant, regular maintenance activities would still need to be
performed, such as landscaping ($6,800) and tree maintenance ($2,500), and
maintaining the Heating, Ventilation, and Cooling (HVAC) system ($5,000) in order to
control humidity and temperature fluctuations. Additionally, the City will need to cover the
cost of utilities, such as water ($2,500) and electricity ($3,500), pest control services
($1,500), backflow services ($500), and will need to maintain the security system
($2,900). Staff estimates that one-time costs of approximately $882,682 would be
needed to essentially maintain the building structure and approximately $26,200 annually
in regular maintenance costs. There would also be some staff time assigned to the
building in order to maintain these systems, coordinate with contractors, and handle minor
repairs or vandalism.
83
Honorable City Council
11/05/2025 Regular Meeting
Page 8
The City Council also requested a construction impact summary related to the
construction of the new Library should the Council choose to maintain the existing Library.
Staff has reached out to LPA and the City’s construction management consultant, Balfour
Beatty Construction, LLC (Balfour Beatty) for a summary of this information:
• Proposed Construction Plan Revisions
o Revise sewer design to keep the N/S portion of the line serving the existing
library. Will require permit & easement updates.
o Revise parking lot to relocate the site wall. Will result in less parking stalls,
unless the project expands to the east lot. Will require permit updates.
o Modify fire access, dependent on location of new retaining wall. Will require
permit updates.
o Impacts future pedestrian path to Community Center.
o Revise stormwater management strategy. For all lots that are touched, a
stormwater management solution is required.
o Revise grading plans based on new limits and elevations.
o Revised demolition, landscape, irrigation and lighting plans.
o Revise existing gas + electrical connection to the existing building that was
planned to be demolished.
• Schedule
o Schematic Design Plans: 8 weeks
o Development Drawings: 10 weeks
o Construction Drawings: 12 weeks
o Agency Approval – Grading, Building, Fire, VCWD (Sewer): 12 weeks
LPA has estimated that approximately 10.5 months will be required to revise the
Construction Plans and obtain agency approvals, at a total cost of approximately
$705,250. It is anticipated that the total time needed to amend the Agreement with LPA,
prepare a new site plan and construction estimate for the City Council’s consideration,
complete the revisions to the Construction Plans, and negotiate the construction cost
deductions and additions with the Library contractor, AMG and Associates, Inc. (AMG),
will align with the 18-month Phase I construction schedule. However, there are several
variables outside of the City’s control that could delay the project, such as agency
approvals and uncertainty regarding the properties to the east of the new Library. To
maintain the existing Library, parking for the new Library will most likely need to be
extended to the east, however, title reports have not been pulled for these properties, and
surveys have not been completed. For instance, there are existing utility lines that may
need to be relocated requiring coordination with Southern California Edison (SCE), and
there may be associated utility easements that would need to be re-aligned or possibly
vacated.
It should be noted that the construction schedule is a provision of the Agreement with
AMG, and a delay initiated by the City would add mobilization costs to the contract. In a
worst-case scenario, where the City is faced with significant delays to start the Phase II
84
Honorable City Council
11/05/2025 Regular Meeting
Page 9
work, it is possible that the north portion of the new Library site would be removed from
AMG’s contract, and the City would initiate a new separate project, including bidding, and
potentially an award of contract with a different construction company.
Regarding construction cost impacts, both LPA and Balfour Beatty have informed staff
that it would not be possible to estimate construction cost increases or deductions without
a revised site plan to evaluate. If the City Council wants to consider keeping the existing
Library, staff recommends contracting with LPA to prepare a revised site plan and
construction cost estimate. The cost for this initial phase is approximately $46,500.
SEGMENTED DISCUSSIONS
In order to ensure that Councilmembers do not participate in discussions that are
reasonably foreseeable to materially affect their own economic interests or properties
near their economic interests, City staff has identified components of the discussion that
require recusal by two Councilmembers. Thus, the item will be segmented into three
separate discussions on specific properties or groups of properties.
The FPPC segmentation rule allows for the individual components of a larger discussion
that affect Councilmember economic interests to be segmented and dealt with separately
before consideration of the remaining aspects of this discussion. In compliance with the
rules and decisions of the FPPC, the recusal segments that staff and the City Attorney
have identified are defined and labeled as follows:
Recusal Segment 1 involves Councilmember Barrett and Councilmember Castro. This
segment contains property identified as 16 (224 and 236 Charles Street) and 21 (112,
124, and 136 First Street). The property identified as 16 is located adjacent to
Councilmember Barrett’s place of employment on High Street and within 1,000 feet of
real property owned by Councilmember Castro on Charles Street. The properties
identified as 16 and 21 are both subject to an exclusive negotiating agreement, and
decisions related to one property are intertwined with the other property, so they need to
be considered together. This component will be referred to as Recusal Segment 1.
Recusal Segment 2 involves Councilmember Castro. This segment contains properties
identified as 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 (450, 460, 484 Charles Street, 450 and 467 High Street,
APN 512-0-081-090). These properties are located within 1,000 feet of real property
owned by Councilmember Castro on Charles Street. This component will be referred to
as Recusal Segment 2.
Once these two Recusal Segments are addressed separately, the full Council will be
permitted to move on and discuss the remaining properties.
85
Honorable City Council
11/05/2025 Regular Meeting
Page 10
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it does
not constitute a project, as defined by Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
Therefore, no environmental review is required.
FISCAL IMPACT
There are no fiscal impacts from this action.
COUNCIL GOAL COMPLIANCE
This action is consistent with City Council Goal 1, Objective 1.3 “Review Civic Center
Masterplan” and Objective 1.4 “Forge Relationships and Partnerships with Organizations
for Community Services,” and Goal 3, Objective 3.5: “Dispose of Remaining City Properties
under Surplus Land Act Process.”
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Receive presentation on surplus parcels and Civic Center Masterplan, and provide
direction to staff.
Attachment 1: Property Listing
Attachment 2: Overall Map of Parcels
Attachment 3: Civic Center Master Plan
86
Available property
Obligated property
Special condition
Loc# No Street Responsible Entity Obligated Disposition Process/Status (if deemed no further government use)Property Status/Use Zoning Additional Information
1 450 Charles Street City as Successor Housing Agency** N Surplus Land Act (SLA) Vacant R-2
1 460 Charles Street City as Successor Housing Agency** N Surplus Land Act (SLA) Vacant R-2
2 484 Charles Street City as Successor Housing Agency** N Surplus Land Act (SLA) Vacant R-2
3 Corner Charles/Spring Road
APN 512-0-081-090
City N Surplus Land Act (SLA)Vacant R-2 Could be consolidated with 484 Charles Street or left as stand alone
parcel
4 467 High Street City N Surplus Land Act (SLA)Vacant MUM Bond Funded.
5 450 High Street City N Surplus Land Act (SLA)Metrolink Overflow Parking MUM
6 High Street (W of Mpk Avenue, N Side)
APN 511-0-020-275
City N Surplus Land Act (SLA)Vacant MUM Civic Center Parcels
7 661 Moorpark Avenue City N Surplus Land Act (SLA)Vacant MUM Civic Center Parcels
7 675 Moorpark Avenue City N Surplus Land Act (SLA)Vacant MUM Civic Center Parcels
7 699 Moorpark Avenue City N Surplus Land Act (SLA)Existing Library MUM Civic Center Parcels
8 799 Moorpark Avenue City N Surplus Land Act (SLA)Former Civic Center MUM Civic Center Parcels
9 1063 Walnut Canyon Road City as Successor Housing Agency** N Currently available/SLA Complete Vacant R-1
9 1073 Walnut Canyon Road City as Successor Housing Agency** N Currently available/ SLA Complete Vacant R-1
9 1083 Walnut Canyon Road City as Successor Housing Agency** N Currently negotiating with interested party, SLA Completed Vacant R-1
9 1095 Walnut Canyon Road City as Successor Housing Agency** N Currently negotiating with interested party, SLA Completed Vacant R-1
9 1113 Walnut Canyon Road City as Successor Housing Agency** Y Currently negotiating with interested party, SLA Completed Vacant R-1
9 1123 Walnut Canyon Road City as Successor Housing Agency** Y Currently negotiating with interested party, SLA Completed Vacant R-1
10 1293 Walnut Canyon Road City as Successor Housing Agency** Y Currently negotiating with interested party, SLA Completed Vacant R-1
10 1331 Walnut Canyon Road City as Successor Housing Agency** Y Currently negotiating with interested party, SLA Completed Vacant R-1
11 13991 Princeton Avenue City N Surplus Land Act (SLA)Vacant R-E
12 Princeton Property (vacant)
APN 513-0-024-105 &-134
Successor Agency N Surplus Land Act (SLA)/ requires approval by County Oversight
Board
Vacant R-2 Bond Funded. Arroyo erosion has reduced parcel size. Also
encumbered with undocmented fill dirt. Suggest keeping as open
space/future trail head. But will require City to purchase from SA and
use funds to defease bonds.
13 282 Los Angeles Avenue City N Surplus Land Act (SLA)Vacant R-1
14 High Street (W of Mpk Ave South Side)
APN 511-0-090-420
RDA N Surplus Land Act (SLA) Vacant M-2 Landlocked parcel, was not included in the LRPMP, needs to be
transferred to City
15 Millard Street (vacant property adjacent to
Arroyo) APN 506-0-
020-525
City as Successor Housing Agency** N Surplus Land Act (SLA)Vacant R-3 Currently parcel is landlocked and completely encumbered by an
easement from Watershed Protection for the Arroyo Simi. May be
best to retain as trailhead area as part of Arroyo Simi Trail project.
Need to transfer from RDA to City still.
16 224 Charles Street City as Successor Housing Agency** Y ENA*Vacant R-2
16 236 Charles Street City as Successor Housing Agency** Y ENA*Vacant R-2
17 33 High Street City Y Commercial Building/Theater Support MUM
17 45 High Street City Y High Street Arts Center MUM
17 61 High Street City Y Commercial Building/Theater Support MUM
18 18 High Street City N Surplus Land Act (SLA)Chamber Site MUM Evaluation underway on sewer repair and parking lot improvement -
may be obligated to Chamber use.
19 31 Poindexter City Y Warehouse/Theater Support/ Moorpark
Avenue Widening
MUL
20 488 McFadden Street City Y House / Poindexter First St Alignment /
Moorpark Ave Widening
R-1
21 112 First Street City as Successor Housing Agency**Y ENA*Vacant R-1
21 124 First Street City as Successor Housing Agency** Y ENA*Vacant R-1
21 136 First Street City Housing Y ENA*Vacant R-1
22 1449 Walnut Canyon Road City Y House/Future Walnut Cyn Bridge R-1
22 1493 Walnut Canyon Road City Y House/Future Walnut Cyn Bridge R-1
23 20/50 Moorpark Avenue City Y Restaurant/LA Avenue Widening MUL El Pollo Corona Grill
24 148 Los Angeles Avenue City Y Vacant/LA Avenue Widening R-3
25 240 Los Angeles Avenue City Y House/LA Avenue Widening R-1
25 250 Los Angeles Avenue City as Successor Housing Agency** Y Surplus Land Act (SLA)House/LA Avenue Widening R-1
NOTES:
** Funds deposited in SHA fund. Converting SHA properties to anything other then affordable housing would require reimbursement of the Successor Housing Agency fund by City for FMV of the parcel.
Bond funded property proceeds are returned to bonds
*The Area Housing Authority has an ENA on these five parcels along with the Affordable Housing Parcel to be deeded to the City by Pacific Communities. ENA is to develop a Scattered Sites affordable rental housing project. If that project falls through these properties would be
ATTACHMENT 1
87
OVERALL PROPERTY MAP
1
ATTACHMENT 2
88
ATTACHMENT 3
89