The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAG RPTS 1991 0123 RDA REG REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK AGENDA Wednesday, January 23, 1991 7: 00 p.m. Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. CONSENT CALENDAR: (Roll Call Vote) A. Consider Approval of the Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency Meeting of August 15. 1990. Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes as processed. B. Approval of the Warrant Register: Warrant #132 $15,320.51 C. Consider Adoption of 1990/91 Budget and Consider Loan of $50, 000 from City General Fund Reserve Account to the Redevelopment Agency. Staff Recommendation: Adopt proposed budget as presented in Attachment "A", and authorize staff to proceed with loan of $50, 000. D. Consider Agreement with Ventura County Superintendent of Schools and Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Regarding Tax Increments. Staff Recommendation: Approve Agreement. 3. ADJOURNMENT: Any member of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency during the Public Comments portion of the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing item. Speakers who wish to address the Redevelopment Agency concerning a Public Hearing item must do so during the Public Hearing for that item. Speaker Cards must be received by the Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency prior to the Call to Order of the meeting. Speakers will be heard in the order that their Speaker Cards are received. A limitation of 3 minutes shall be imposed upon each speaker. CITY OF MOORPARK ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) I, Lillian E. Kellerman, duly appointed City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, County of Ventura, State of California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that I posted a copy of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency agenda on January 18, 1991 for the meeting of January 23 , 1991 at the following location: Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 Said agenda shall remain in place until after the meeting so that it is available for public review for at least 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Section 54954 et. seq. of the California Government Code. Lillian E. Kellerman, City Clerk Dated: January 22, 1991 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tern SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk WARRANT TOTALS MOORPARK ITEM_�ig• WARRANT REGISTER FOR THE 1990/91 FTSCAT, YEAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 23, 1991 COVERRDA /FINANCE 'DORPARK, CALIFORNIA City C I Meeting of 1991 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 132 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer $15,320.51 $15,320.51 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor SCOTT MONTGOMERY Mayor Pro Tern ELOISE BROWN Councilmember CLINT HARPER, Ph.D. Councilmember PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr. Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk WARRANT TOTALS i MOORPARK WARRANT RF.GTSTFR FOR THE 1990/91 FTSCAI, YEAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF IIFC:F:MAFR t7S, 1990 REDEVELOPMENT' AGENCY 131 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer $15,320.51 $15,320.51 ,ORPARK, CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 BERNARDO M.PEREZ Mayor SCOTT MONTGOMERY y Mayor Pro Tem ELOISE BROWN Councilmember CLINT HARPER, Ph.D. Councilmember PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr. Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MOORPARK WARRANT REGISTER FOR THE 1990/91 FFSCAT, YEAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 05, 1990 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer VOIDED WARRANT 131 ($15,320.51) TOTALS ($15,320.51) 70RPARK, CALIFORNU; qty Council Meeflng of 199 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 CITY OF MOORPARK 01/17/91 16:11:39 CHECK# DATE VENDOR BANK OF A. LEVY 131 11/30/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO 25 131 11/30/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO 25 131 11/30/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO 25 131 11/30/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO 25 131 11/30/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS Sc SO 25 131 11/30/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO 25 131 11/30/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO 25 131 11/30/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO 25 3' 11/30/90 BURKE. WILLIAMS & SC 25 132 01/23/9' .32 01//23/9" 132 0'/23/9 32 01/23/9 - 3L 01/23/91 132 01/23/97 132 01/23/91 132 01/23/91 132 01/23/91 BURKE, BURKE BURKE BURKE BURKE, BURKE, BURKE, BURKE, BURKE, BANK OF A. LEVY WILLIAMS & SC % 2` WILLIAMS & SC 21 WILLIAMS & SO 25 WI_LIAMS & SC 2; WILLIAMS & SC 2` WILLIAMS & SO 2; WILLIAMS & SC 2� WILLIAMS & SO 25 WILLIAMS & SO 25 Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE WARRANT HELD -VOID 070.4.114.64.. =. 98.000R 12/05 3396 P N WARRANT HELD -VOID N 10,423.79CR 12/05 3396 & 3653 WARRANT HELD -VOID C 820.08CR 12/05 3396 & 3653 WARRANT HELD -VOID 070.4.131.642 234.70CR 12/05 3396 & 3653 WARRANT HELD -VOID 60.68CR 12/05 3396 & 3653 WARRANT HELD -VOID 365.40CR 12/05 3856 WARRANT HELD -VOID 1,089.50CR 12/05 3856 WARRANT HELD -VOID 537.26CR 12/05 3856 WARRANT HELD -VOID 1,691.10CR 12/05 3856 15,320.51CR *CHECK TOTAL 1359 -052 JULY 1990 98.0C 1/23 3396 1359 -057 JULY -AUG. 1990 10,423.75 1/2- 3396, 365-' 1659 -051 JULY -AUG. 1990 820.08 1/23 3396, 3651: 1359 -049 JULY -AUG, 1990 234.70 1/23 3396, 365? 1359 -047 JULY -AUG. 1990 60.68 1/2: 3396. 365, 1359 -049 SEPTEMBER 1990 365.40 1/23 3856 1359 -051 SEPTEMBER 1990 1,089.50 1/2 1359 -052 SEPTEMBER 1990 537.26 1123 3856 1359 -051 SEPTEMBER 1990 1,691.10 1/23 3856 15,320.51 *CHECK TOTAL TOTAL 0.00 CITY OF MOORPARK GL540R- VO4.03 PAGE 1 PO# F 9 S ACCOUNT P N M 070.4.114.643 P N M 070.4.114.643 P N M 070.4.131.642 P N M 070.4.131.642 P N M 070.4.131.642 P N M 070.4.131.642 P N M 070.4.131.642 P N M 070.4.131.642 P N M 070.4.131.642 P N C 070.4.114.64.. =. F N L 070.4.114.64: P N D 070.4.131.642 N D 070.4.13'.642 N L 070. .13".642 N C 070.4.13".642 P N D 07(,.4.137.642 i' N U 070.4.131.642 r' N D 070.4.131.642 CITY OF MOORPARK 01/17/91 16:11:39 Disbursement Journal CHECK# DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE REPORT TOTALS: 0.00 RECORDS PRINTED - 000018 CITY OF MOORPARK GL540R- VO4.03 PAGE 2 P0# F 9 S ACCOUNT CITY OF MOORPARK CITY OF MOORPARK 01/17/91 16:11:56 Disbursement Journal GL060S- VO4.03 RECAPPAGE GL540R FUND RECAP: FUND DESCRIPTION - - -- ---- -------------- ---- - - - - -- 070 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TOTAL ALL FUNDS BANE RECAP BANE - - -- NAME ---------------------------- BAN� BANE O L IOTA - AL- BANE::: DISBURSEMENTS DISBURSEMENTS CITY OF MOORPARK CITY OF MOORPARK 01/17/91 16:23:45 Schedule of Bills (Fund) GL060S- VO4.03 RECAPPAGE GL540R FUND RECAP: FUND DESCRIPTION - - -- --------------- --- ---- - - - - -- 070 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TOTAL ALL FUNDS BANK RECAP: BANK NAME - - -- --- --- ---------- ---- -- - - -- -- BA* BANIF OF A. LEVY' TOTAL ALL BANKS DISBURSEMENTS DISBURSEMENTS THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT. DATE ............ APPROVED BY CITY OF MOORPARK CITY OF MOORPARK 11/28/90 16:27:03 Disbursement Journal GI-050S-VO4.03 COVERPAGE GL540R Report Selection: RUN GROUP... 12590 COMMENT... RDA WARRANT 12/05/90 MTG DATA -JE -ID DATA COMMENT - --- --- - - - - - -- - ---- --------- ---- - - ---- D- 11301990 -730 RDA WARRANT 12/05/90 MTG Run Instructions: Jobq Banner Copies Form Printer HoIc Space LP Lines CPI J 03 P1 N S E 066 10 CITY OF MOORPARK 11/28/90 16:27:14 CHECK# DATE VENDOR BANK OF A. LEVY 131 12/15/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO 25 131 12/15/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO 25 131 12/15/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO 25 131 12/15/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO 25 131 12/15/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO 25 131 12/15/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO 25 131 12/15/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO 25 131 12/15/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO 25 13, 12/15/90 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SO 25 BANK OF A. LEVY Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE 1359 -052 JULY, 1990 98.00 12/05 3396 1359-057 JULY&AUG, 1990 10,423.79 12/05 3396 & 3653 1359 -051 JULY&AUG, 1990 820.08 12/05 3396 & 3653 1359 -049 JULY&AUG, 1990 234.70 12/05 3396 & 3653 1359 -047 JULY&AUG, 1990 60.68 12/05 3396 & 3653 1359 -049 SEPT, 1990 365.40 12/05 3856 1359 -051 SEPT, 1990 1,089.50 12/05 3856 1359 -052 SEPT, 1990 537.26 12/05 3856 1359 -057 SEPT, 1990 1,691.10 12/05 3856 15,320.51 *CHECK TOTAL TOTAL 15,320.51 CITY OF MOORPARK GL540R- VO4.03 PAGE 1 PO# F 9 S ACCOUNT P N D 070.4.114.643 P N D 070.4.114.643 P N D 070.4.131.642 P N D 070.4.131.642 P N D 070.4.131.642 P N D 070.4.131.642 P N D 070.4.131.642 P N D 070.4.131.642 P N D 070.4.131.642 CITY OF MOORPARK 11/28/90 16:27:14 Disbursement Journal CHECK# DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE REPORT TOTALS: 15,320.51 RECORDS PRINTED - 000009 CITY OF MOORPARK GL540R- VO4.03 PAGE 2 PO# F 9 S ACCOUNT CITY OF MOORPARK 11/28/90 16:29:04 FUND RECAP: FUND DESCRIPTION - - -- ----------------- ----- - - - - -- 070 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TOTAL ALL FUNDS BANK RECAP: BANK NAME - - -- ---------------------------- BANE BANK OF A. LEV\ TOTAL ALL BANKS Schedule of Bills (Fund) DISBURSEMENTS 15,320.51 15,320.51 DISBURSEMENTS 15,320.51 15,320.5 THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT, DATE APPROVED BY .. ............................... CITY OF MOORPARK GL060S- VO4.03 RECAPPAGE GL540R 1��13 MOORPARK STEM JRPARK, CALIFORNIA PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. c ityC uncal Meeting pPPP�9�° STEVEN KUENY Mayor oo��`� City Manager BERNARDO M. PEREZ of 7.23 199 41,;(4111, CHERYL J. KANE Mayor Pro Tern � City Attorney SCOTT MONTGOMERY ACTION. A/I/1' / • ��,� PATRICK RICHARDS,A.I.0 P. Councilmember - m Director of l/ it. <•�.,'�� m JOHN E. WOZNIAK y/ / jAp°4 ,^ Community Development Councilmember �� — 'E. �� JOHN F KNIPE LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Engineer City Clerk JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police MEMORANDUM RICHARD T HARE City Treasurer TO: THE MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FROM: RICHARD HARE, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER , DATE: JANUARY 16, 1991 SUBJECT: TAX INCREMENT AGREEMENT WITH VENTURA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS BACKGROUND The Ventura County Superintendent of Schools provided the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency with a draft tax increment agreement. The draft agreement was reviewed by Urban Futures and the City Attorney. The clarifying changes in language recommended by the City Attorney were incorporated into the agreement which is now before the Agency for approval. Per this agreement, the Agency will contribute two percent of the of the tax increment revenue to the Superintendent's Building Fund which shall be under the control of the Superintendent. The Superintendent agrees to waive fiscal review, causes of action against the Agency and asserts that the Superintendent will not suffer any financial burden or detriment from the Project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this agreement in its present form which is acceptable to the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools. Further, staff recommends that the Chairman of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency be empowered to execute this agreement and such other documents which may be necessary to carry out the intentions of the respective parties as provided in the agreement. mpk\vcss.rda 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864 AGREEMENT WITH VENTURA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of 1991, by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark (AGENCY), and the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools Office (SUPERINTENDENT). RECITALS The AGENCY has adopted a redevelopment plan (PROJECT) for the area designated as (PROJECT AREA) in the City of Moorpark which Project Area is� presently blighted. Sections 33401 and 33676 of the California Health and Safety Code provide that the AGENCY and the SUPERINTENDENT may enter into agreements relative to the allocation of tax- increment revenues. The AGENCY and the SUPERINTENDENT desire to enter into an agreement to provide for allocation of future tax - increment revenues due to the PROJECT and to alleviate any financial detriment to SUPERINTENDENT as a result of PROJECT. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the covenants and conditions herein contained, the AGENCY and the SUPERINTENDENT agree as follows: 1. The SUPERINTENDENT shall receive the tax revenues which would have been allocated to the SUPERINTENDENT after an election pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676(a)(1). 2. An amount equal to the SUPERINTENDENT'S portion of the tax - increment revenue arising by reason of increases in the assessed valuation of taxable property within the PROJECT AREA over and above the assessed valuation of the PROJECT AREA established by the assessment roll last equalized (base year) prior to the effective date of the ordinance adopting the Project which the SUPERINTENDENT would receive by applying the inflation factor (currently two percent (2 %)) provided for by Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 51 and 110.1 shall be distributed to the SUPERINTENDENT within thirty (30) days after receipt by AGENCY of the revenue upon which the distribution is based. The SUPERINTENDENT'S portion of the tax - increment revenue shall be considered a contribution to the SUPERINTENDENT'S Building Fund. 3. The tax - increment revenues contributed to the SUPERINTENDENT'S Building Fund shall accumulate from year to year, along with the earned interest on these funds, and these monies shall be expended only by the SUPERINTENDENT. 4. The AGENCY'S obligation hereunder shall continue as long as tax increment monies are allocated as presently provided by California Health and Safety Code Section 33670, et. seq., or other applicable laws, for the PROJECT. 5. The SUPERINTENDENT agrees that it has waived its right to request the convening of a fiscal review committee as authorized by law and has further waived any objections to the adoption of the PROJECT, so long as the provisions of this agreement are in full force and effect. SUPERINTENDENT further agrees that if the terms of this agreement are carried out it will not suffer any financial burden or detriment from the PROJECT. 6. SUPERINTENDENT hereby waives any and all causes of action, cases, claims, accounts, actions or complaints relating to, and agrees not to challenge the validity of, the PROJECT or the validity, on the grounds of the invalidity of the PROJECT, of bonds to finance or refinance in whole or in part the PROJECT, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the legality and validity of all proceedings heretofore taken for or in any way of all proceedings heretofore taken for or in any way connected with the designation or selection of the PROJECT AREA, the formation of the preliminary PROJECT, and the adoption of the PROJECT, and also including the legality and validity of all proceedings undertaken in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the PROJECT pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. 7. The AGENCY and the SUPERINTENDENT agree to execute such other documents as may be necessary to carry out the intentions of the respective parties as provided for herein. 8. The agreement has been approved by action of the Ventura County Board of Education taken at its meeting on the day of , lg 9. The AGENCY'S authorization to enter into this agreement has been confirmed by action of the AGENCY taken at its meeting on the day of 1 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed on the date first above written. Moorpark Redevelopment Agency By ATTEST: Secretary Ventura County Superintendent of Schools By ATTEST: Secretary Ventura County Board of Education Ventura, California AGREEMENT WITH VENTURA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this Pr3 day of LgLet 1991, by and between the Redevelopment Agency p the Cif of Moorpark (AGENCY), and the Ventura County Superintenden of Schools Office (SUPERINTENDENT). RECITALS The AGENCY has adopted redevelopment plan (P OJEC ) for the area designated as (PROJECT AREA) in the City f Moorpark which Proj t Area is presently blighted. Sections 33401 and 33676 of the California Health and Safety Code provide that the AGENCY and the SUPERINTENDENT may enter into agreements relative to the allocation of tax - increment revenues. The AGENCY and the SUPERINTENDENT desire to enter into an agreement to provide for the allocation of future tax - increment revenues due to the PROJECT and to alleviate any financial detriment to SUPERINTENDENT as a result of PROJECT. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the covenants and conditions herein contained, the AGENCY and the SUPERINTENDENT agree as follows: 1. The SUPERINTENDENT shall receive the tax revenues which would have been allocated to the SUPERINTENDENT after an election pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676(a) (1). 2. An amount equal to the SUPERINTENDENT'S portion of the tax - increment revenue arising by reason of increases in the assessed valuation of taxable property within the PROJECT AREA over and above the assessed valuation of the PROJECT AREA established by the assessment roll last equalized (base year) prior to the effective date of the ordinance adopting the PROJECT which the SUPERINTENDENT would receive by applying the inflation factor (currently two percent (2 %)) provided for by Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 51 and 110.1 shall be distributed 9/- ie to the SUPERINTENDENT within thirty (30) days after receipt by AGENCY of the revenue upon which the distribution is based. The SUPERINTENDENT'S portion of the tax - increment revenue shall be considered a contribution to the SUPERINTENDENT'S Building Fund. 3. The tax - increment revenues contributed to the SUPERINTENDENT'S Building Fund shall accumulate from year to year, along with the earned interest on these funds, and these monies shall be expended only by the SUPERINTENDENT. 4. The AGENCY'S obligation hereunder shall continue as long as tax increment monies'are allocated as presently provided by California Health and Safety Code Section 33670, et. seq., or other applicable laws, for the PROJECT. 5. The SUPERINTENDENT agrees that it has waived its right to request the convening of a fiscal review committee as authorized by law and has further waived any objections to the adoption of the PROJECT, so long as the provisions of this agreement are in full force and effect. SUPERINTENDENT further agrees that if the terms of this agreement are carried out it will not suffer any financial burden or detriment from the PROJECT. 6. SUPERINTENDENT hereby waives any and all causes of action, cases, claims, accounts, actions or complaints relating to, and agrees not to challenge the validity of, the PROJECT or the validity, on the grounds of the invalidity of the PROJECT, of bonds to finance or refinance in whole or in part the PROJECT, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the legality and validity of all proceedings heretofore taken for or in any way connected with the designation or selection of the PROJECT AREA, the formation of the preliminary PROJECT, and the adoption of the PROJECT, and also including the legality and validity of all proceedings undertaken in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the PROJECT pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. 7. The AGENCY and the SUPERINTENDENT agree to execute such other documents as may be necessary to carry out the intentions of the respective parties as provided for herein. 8. This agreement has been approved by action of the Ventura County o rd of Education taken at its meeting on the th day 0 f , 19&Y. 9. The AGENCY'S authorization to enter into this agreement has been confirmed by action of the AGENCY taken at its meeting on the :?3 day of 41� lg,1j . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed on the date first above written. Ventury,County Superintendent of Schools By ATTEST: S c etary V ura County Board of Education Ventura, California AGR929863 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tem SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MOORPARK ITEMA -_ JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE M E M O R A N D U M City Treasurer C. P. TO: The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency FROM: Donald P. Reynolds, Jr., Management Analyst DATE: January 16, 1991 SUBJECT: Status of Redevelopment Agency Fiscal Proposed 1990/91 Budget Recommendations The following report will summarize the fiscal status of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency, (RDA). A proposed budget for fiscal year 1990/91 is presented in Attachment "B ", based on staff's projection of RDA needs for the this fiscal year. Staff is recommending a loan and transfer of $50,000 from the City's General Fund Reserve to be appropriated for special legal services, and the adoption by the Agency of the proposed 1990/91 Redevelopment Agency budget. Background On August 26, 1987 the City made its first loan to RDA in the amount of $55,000. A second loan was approved in fiscal year 1988/89 in the amount of $13,000. On October 18, 1989, the Redevelopment Agency approved a loan from the City in the amount of $70,000 under the terms and conditions that interest would be applied to this loan, and that RDA would repay all City loans by June 30, 1994. On January 10, 1990, an additional loan of $15,000 was approved. On January 18, 1989, the Agency adopted a budget for fiscal Year 1989/90 with projected expenditures totalling $54,536. These funds were appropriated primarily for special legal services, with an allowance of $2,500 for consultant work and $2,000 for design services, ( in the event that the legal matters were resolved, and project implementation could be initiated). June 15, 1990, report to Council authorized $30,000 to be 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 BERNARDO M.PEREZ Mayor SCOTT MONTGOMERY Mayor Pro Tern ELOISE BROWN Councilmember CLINT HARPER, Ph.D. Councilmember PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr. Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk TO: FROM: DATE: Attachment A MOORPARK ITEM S• C . STEVEN KUENY F ° i .:ORPARK. CALIFORNIA City Manager City Council Meeting CHERYL J. KANE p of 1 99 City Attorney RICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. oa a °n ACTION:,,_, Director Of Community Development f° R. DENNIS DELZEIT By City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE azl� 4e Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer M E M O R A N D U M The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Donald P. Reynolds, Jr., Management June 15, 1990 Analyst SUBJECT: Status of Redevelopment Agency Fiscal Matters for 1989/90 Budget Recommendations The following report summarizes the fiscal status of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency, (RDA). A proposed revised budget for fiscal year 1989/90 is presented in Attachment "B ", based on staff's projection of RDA needs for the remainder of this fiscal year. Staff is recommending a loan and transfer of $30,000 from the City's General Fund Reserve to be appropriated for special Legal services. Discussion January 10, 1990, report to Council authorized $15,000 to be transferred from the City's General Fund Reserve to the Redevelopment Agency for special legal services. This report also allowed staff to return to the Agency and request additional funds for special legal services in the event that the cost of these services exceed the current appropriation. The loan authorized January 10, 1990, of $15,000, increased the total RDA appropriation to fiscal year 1989 90, $54,536 for there would 9 a With the additional $30,000 loan total appropriation of $84,536 this fiscal year. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 RDA Budget June 15, 1990 Page 2 Recommendation t That the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency: 1) Approve a transfer from the City General Fund Reserve in the amount of $30,000 in order to fund required legal services for fiscal year 1989/90, to be added to the previously modified fund balance of $54,536, for a total of $84,536; 2) Adopt the revised budget as presented in Attachment B, for fiscal year 1989/90; Attachments: A) January 10, 1990 Staff Report B) Proposed Revised Redevelopment Agency Budget a PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr. Mayor SCOTT MONTGOMERY Mayor Pro Tem ELOISE BROWN Councilmember CUNT HARPER, Ph.D. Councilmember BERNARDO M. PEREZ Counalmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk ATTACHMENT A MOORPA� M E M O R A N D U M ry STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYLJ.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of y Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer TO: The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency FROM: Donald P. Reynolds, Jr_, Management Analyst pz_� DATE: January 10, 1990 SUBJECT: Status of Redevelopment Agency Fiscal Matters for 1989/90 Budget Recommendations The following report summarizes the fiscal status of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency, (RDA). A draft budget for_ fiscal year 1989 /90=is presented based on staff's-projection of RDA needs for ,the• remainder _of this fiscal' year. `- Staff:: does not anticipate that the Agency will have much of an-------- opportunity to expand beyond resolution of the.:.current.-.- litigations. Therefore;--- staff is recommending,-,a loan and transfer of $15,000 from the City's General, -Fund Reserve to be appropriated primarily for special legal services_ Background The October 16, 1989 report to the Council authorized $70,000 to be transferred from the City's General Fund Reserve to the Redevelopment Agency as follows; $30,000 for 1988/89 expenses, and $40,000 for 1989/90 expenses_ The total City transfers thus far to RDA is $138,000, (Attachment A). The Agency's total expenditures up to July 1, 1989 are $98,928, leaving $39,536, for fiscal year 1989/90. With the additional $15,000 loan, there would be a total appropriation for fiscal year 1989/90 of $54,536. A financial statement has been prepared which illustrates Agency fiscal matters since 1987. and proposed appropriations for 1989/90 fiscal_year,.(Attachment B).-, Through December,.. 1989/90 expenses relate " s solely to special. legal services;-. the $24,560, leaving a balance of $14,976, (or $29,976 less (805) 529 -6864 •-k Avenue Moorpark, Califomia 93021 Proposed interfund loan), shown as Attachment B. "Current Status" in Discussion The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency will need to appropriate funding for fiscal year legal services and related 8serv0i for the cost of special ces r consultant, and possibly for the initiationOf projects. Staff feels that these costs should be appropriated Projects. needed in order to keep the Agency to minimum. as Therefore, staff is recommending that $15,000 betransferr from the City General Fund Reserve utilizing legal costs, transferred (10,000 for special legal services for in case the consultant is re and $2,500 defense), leaving required to assist in the City's to the current litigation professional services unrelated Presented for the Agency's- enc 's The Proposed 1989/90 budget is Attachment C_ g y consideration and adoption, Recommendation That the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency: 1} Approve a transfer from the City General Reserve in the amount of Fund required legal services $15,000 in order:to fund fiscal year 1989 g0 and Project initiation for fund balance of $39,536,be added.to the:.be for- a total -: a ginning Of $54;536. _ appropriation 2 ) Adopt he'.._ proposed budget Attachment as presented in C, for fiscal year 1989/90; 3) Allow staff to return toj additional be transferred funds to the_Agency and .request the event as needed in exceeds the current a c of special legal services Pp ropriations. Attachments: A) Staff Report to Council, 16, 1989 October B) Redevelopment Agency Financial Statement C} Proposed Redevelopment Agency Budget .for - Fiscal Year ;1989/90 �?_`'� -, ^yam: •- �.�:;.'�,�y,�.•w;•,K-. '�;•_ � f.; - Mil IJI i PROPOSED REVISED REDEVELOPMENT BUDGET REVENUE BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 54,536 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND RESERVE 30,000 TOTAL REVENUES 84,536 AGENCY APPROPRIATIONS SPECIAL LEGAL SERVICES 79,536 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,500 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 5,000 TOTAL 84,536 ce Fiscal Year 1988/89, including the proposed transfer of $30,000, is $183,000 ATTACHMENT B PROPOSED MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 REVENUE Actual Budget 1989 90 1990 91 Beginning Fund Balance (464) Tax Increment 4,500 0 250,993 Loan from General Funds Reserve 85.000_ 50 000 Total Revenues 84,536 305,493 AGENCY APPROPRIATIONS Budget Actual Budget 1989 90 1989 90 —.1990/91 Special Legal Services 79,500 79,500 50,000 Contractual Services 2,500 p 2,500 Engineering and Design 2,000 0 2,000 Total Expenditures 85,000 79,500 54,500 Reserve Fund Balance 250,993 Total Liabilities 305,493 Fund Balances - Unreserved 4,500 0 * The total City loan to the Redevelopment Agency from FY to FY 1989/90, equals $183,000. 1987/88 $50,000 equals a total City Adding proposed loan of $233,000. FY 1990/91 loan of PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M.PEREZ Mayor Pro Tem SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MOORPARK M E M O R A N D U M TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Lillian E. Kellerman, City Clerk - n DATE: January 18, 1991 SUBJECT: AGENDA PACKET FOR 1/23/91 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer Please be advised of the following with regard to the agenda packet for January 23, 1991: 11.B. Residential Refuse Agreements. These agreements were not received from the Attorney's office in time to include them in the packet; they will be provided under separate cover. 11.C. LEAP Report. This report will be given under separate cover, as it was not received in time to include it in the packet. , 12.A. Ordinance for Zone Change for UWC. This ordinance has previously been provided to the Council. Second reading will be continued until the next regular meeting - February 6, 1991. — 12•B• Ordinance Adopting Community Design Plan and Development Standards for the Carlsberg Specific Plan. This ordinance has previously been provided to the Council. Nothing new has been included in the packet. The meeting of January 23rd has been called as a Special Meeting, no items can be added after the posting of the agenda. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 ITEM 4 CITY OF MOORPARK PROCLAMATION CRIME STOPPERS MONTH JANUARY 1991 WHEREAS, the month of January has been designated world wide as CRIME STOPPERS MONTH; and WHEREAS, CRIME STOPPERS is an international organization consisting of over 800 programs in eleven countries with every state in the United States of America represented, all of which forms a network dedicated to solving crimes in each local jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, this community based, nonprofit organization operating on private sector donations has solved 297,106 felony crimes and recovered $1,655,547,203 in stolen property and illegal drugs since it began in 1976 through July 1990 enjoying a 97% conviction rate; and WHEREAS, the local CRIME STOPPERS PROGRAM, which organized in October 1986 in Thousand Oaks and is now established in Moorpark, has paid more than $11,000 for information that solved 146 robberies, burglaries thefts and major vandalisms; and WHEREAS, CRIME STOPPERS dedicates to solve and deter crime in Moorpark and all other communities within Ventura County; and WHEREAS, CRIME STOPPERS efforts deserve our praise, commendation and support; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, does set its hand and cause the seal of the City of Moorpark to be affixed this 23rd day of January, 1991 and proclaims January, 1991 as CRIME STOPPERS MONTH and encourages all citizens to support this program in its effort to sustain our City,s low crime rate, thus maintaining Moorpark as a safe place to live. Paul W. Lawrason Jr., Mayor Scott Montgomery, Councilmember Bernardo M. Perez, Councilmember John E. Wozniak, Councilmember 1 SENIOR DEPUTY ROBERT (BOBBY) LANG Bobby and his wife Mary reside in the City of Camarillo. They have two daughters, Tara (5) and Christa (2). After almost nine years with the Ventura County Sheriff's Department, Bobby has decided to pursue a career in the chiropractic field. Bobby and his family will be moving shortly to Missouri where he will further his studies. Bobby Lang was appointed as a Deputy Sheriff in March of 1981. After successful completion of the academy Bobby was assigned to the East Valley Division as a patrol officer. He received his patrol training in Moorpark and shortly thereafter patrolled the City of Thousand Oaks until 1988 when he was promoted to Senior Deputy. Bobby served as a Custody Division supervisor until September of 1989 when he was selected for the Senior Deputy patrol position in the City of Moorpark. In 1987 Bobby was the first deputy from the Sheriff's Department who attended the specialized Drug Recognition Training sponsored by the Los Angeles Police Department. He finished second out of a class of fiftyfour police officers. Because of his performance in the area of drug recognition and his teaching abilities, Bobby was requested by the Los Angeles Police Department to attend the instructors certification school. Bobby successfully completed the extensive required training and is now recognized an expert in the drug recognition field. Bobby has obviously made quite an impact on many people throughout his career. There are too many commendations on file to list them all but it is important to highlight some very significant accomplishments: 1983 - Commendation from the Mayor of Thousand Oaks. A residence in a trailer park had caught on fire and Bobby immediately took quick and decisive action in hosing down the home and shutting off the gas main. 1985 - Commendation from Chief of Police Lindsey Miller of the Simi Valley Police Department. An armed robbery occurred in Simi Valley and the suspects were last seen heading towards the East Valley area. Bobby located the two suspects and assisted in the arrest. Chief Miller commented to Sheriff Gillespie, "It's diligent police officers such as Deputy Lang who allow your agency to enjoy the fine reputation that it has." K, 1988 - Commendation from the District Attorney's Office thanking Bobby for one of the most thorough driving under the influence reports that the office has ever reviewed. It is evident that the Sheriff's Department is losing a dedicated employee who has given much to the citizens of Moorpark. PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M.PEREZ Mayor Pro Tern SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MANUAL WARRANTS VOIDED WARRANTS WARRANTS TOTALS MOORPARK WARRANT RFGTSfFR FOR THE 1990 -91 FTSCAI YFAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING >Ir ,i.ANIJARY 23, 1991 13093 - 13100, 13963 13682, 12710 14488 - 14558 coversht /finance 13977 %',00RPARK, CALIFORNIA City Council Meefing of /�1991 ITE Sn-? 9 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer $ 24,699.39 (315.21) $159,396.36 $183,780.54 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 CITY OF MOORPARK 01/17/91 09:52:20 Report Selection: RUN GROUP... 012391 CITY OF MOORPARK Disbursement Journal GL050S- VO4.03 COVERPAGE GL540R COMMENT... WARRANTS FOR 01/23/91MTG DATA- ,IE -ID DATA COMMENT -------- - - - - -- ------ ------------ - - -- -- -(i l� l t9y - 1C• WARkANI FOF ()1/23/91MTC, M.V- 12/26/9( - 12/28/9O opacr _r net. CP � 1, CITY OF MOORPARK 01/17/91 09:52:27 CHECK# DATE VENDOR BANK OF A. LEVY 12710 01/31/91 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA 86 13093 12/31/90 RIME, PAUL L & GEORG .8720 13093 12/31/90 RIME, PAUL L & GEORG .8720 Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE CONFERENCE - D. REYNOLDS PARKS REBATE LIGHTS REBATE �u9L 1� % ; . q( BOB'S TREE SER`✓ I Ct_ 2i, REMOVAL & GRIND 3 TREES �r19` i2 /9( SAN 1, 0: AR/- HODS I NC c 309 64( CPR,. DEPOS T -�. HAL�,JK '%91 SANTO CLARE- HOUSING. 64( CPRS DEPOSIT -R, CORZINE 309`- ;1:'9( SAN-,;, CLARA HOUSING 309` 12" 64( CPRS DEPOSIT- S.THOMPSON N 646 CPRS DEPOSIT -P . NEWHOUSE 9 SANT: C._ARi- HODS I N( 64( CPRF DEP .SHEL-ABARGEF 9, O MOORi'Ak' i1 IiT .. EXPENSEb .9: 9( 0' MOORPARI 3F BRF "(S, W!SANTA EXPENSE /y LAWRASON, PAUL 8 C.. C. HONORARIUM 13098 01/31/91 MONTGOMERY, SCOTS g9 �. HONORARIUM 13099 01/31/91 PEREZ, BERNARDO 111 C. C. HONORARIUM 13100 01/31/91 WOZNIAk, JOHN 159 C. C. HONORARIUM 13682 12/31/90 RIME, PAUL I & GEORG .8720 STOP PAYMENT -CHECK 13682 13682 12/31/90 RIME, PAUL L & GEORG .8720 STOP PAYMENT -CHECK 13682 13963 01/31/91 HARE, RICHARD 70 CITY TREAS. HONORARIUM 13964 01/31/91 CROCKATT, LYNN 50 COMM. HONORARIUM 13965 01/31/91 CORZINE, RONALD W. 213 P &R COMM. HONORARIUM 13966 01/31/91 HALL, JOHN R., JR. 609 P &R COMM. HONORARIUM 13967 01/31/91 THOMPSON, SANDRA 610 P &R COMM. HONORARIUM 13968 01/31/91 SCHMIDT, GLEN 129 PLNNG. COMM. HONORARIUM 13969 01/31/91 TALLEY, JR /ROY 185 PLNNG. COMM. HONORARIUM 13970 01/31/91 TORRES, JOHN 245 VOID -DID NOT ATTEND MTG. 13971 01/31/91 WESNER, MICHAEL H. J 594 PLNNG. COMM. HONORARIUM 110.00CR 1/9/91 10/90 171.78 12/26 1989/90 33.43 12126 1989/90 205.21 *CHECk TOTAL 800.00 12126 12/21/199( 70.00 1212E 12/20/199( 70.0( 12126. 12/20/199( 70.00 12/21 12/20/1991 70.00 12/26 12/20,'1991 70.0( 12/2( 12120 19.9_i 350.0( *CHEC1 TOTA_ 5'-, . 8`_ 12 /2 c '12"'9( 94.0 12/26 12/91 151.9' +CHECI TOTA, 300.00 1/9/91 12/90 300.00 1/9/91 12/90 300.00 1/9/91 12/90 300.00 1/9/91 12/90 33.43CR 12/26 1989 -90 ASSMNT 171.78CR 12/26 1989 -90 ASSMT 205.21CR *CHECK TOTAL 50.00 1/9/91 12/90 100.00 1/9/91 12/90 100.00 1/9/91 12/90 100.00 1/9/91 12/90 100.00 1/9/91 12/90 100.00 1/9/91 12/90 100.00 1/9/91 12/90 1/9/91 12/90 100.00 1/9/91 12/90 CITY OF MOORPARK GL514OR- VO4.03 PAGE 1 PO# F 9 S ACCOUNT (' N M 001.4.117.632 P N M 025.3.400.403 P N M 023.3.1100.403 E N M i125.q. 14, .(,4" I .5111 h N h' �I,�,.i- ;.141.63, 3 0 i.4. ili.501 F N N 00 ,i;. 1118.63: N M L,.148.63 023.3.400.403 P N M 007 , .1:. 134.63: 7 M 001.4.115.501 7 M 001. It. 14II.501 N M 001.4.148.501 7 M 001.4.148.501 7 M 001 .4. 1118.501 7 M 041.4.131.501 7 M 041.4.131.501 7 M 041.4.131.501 7 M 041.L1,131.501 M UG1.Li, I .5111 7 M 3 0 i.4. ili.501 7 M 001.4.111.501 P N M 023.3.400.403 P N M 025.3.400.403 7 M 001.4.115.501 7 M 001. It. 14II.501 N M 001.4.148.501 7 M 001.4.148.501 7 M 001 .4. 1118.501 7 M 041.4.131.501 7 M 041.4.131.501 7 M 041.4.131.501 7 M 041.L1,131.501 CITY OF MOORPARK 01/17/91 09:52:27 CHECK# DATE VENDOR BANK OF A. LEVY 13972 01/31/91 WM. L. MORRIS CHEVRO 13972 01/31/91 WM. L. MORRIS CHEVRO Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 647 1 TON CAB AND CHASSIS 647 1 TON CAB AND CHASSIS 13973 01,/ 1/91 DYER, FRIC 582 T -BALL INSTRUCTOR - FALL 1 /31/9" MCGOWAN. VIC,IE 64£, INSTRUCTOR -SANTA SHOPPER PEkSONA. COMPUIEF L 18 L COMPUTERS k KEYBOARDS f�aN�nMLr (.r oC(,iDLn 14• iN:_ PREMIUM -R. HARE �:. AftN N( Iti.c UN 1/EI EM I NAk -L . VANDAVEEf AL ANYS I S-F ! NA._ OM :.NT- "A_. - BU G /9l BUS SEP.VICE 49� 'kUWHEAI: UF; 1 NI,, I NC 1/9- SUPPLIES b REN 1 liva9' /?3/9' AUTOMATIC DATA PROCL 12 12121. 12/30/90 PAYROLL 14492 011/23/91 BAHIA RESORT HOTEL 653 LODGING- DEVERS & PETERSN 14493 01/23/91 BEARD, HELEN .9250 MOBILE HOME RENT SUBSIDY 14494 01/23/91 BLACKWELL, VICKIE 585 REIMS. RR 1256 CLASS 14495 01/23/91 BOOK PUBLISHING COMP 256 25 MRPK MUNI CODE BOOKS 14496 01/23/91 BRIGHAM MANUFACTURIN 561 1990 1 -TON DUMP BODY 14496 01/23/91 BRIGHAM MANUFACTURIN 561 1 -TON DUMP STORAGE BOX 14497 01/23/91 BUENA ENGINEERS INC. 24 SOILS TESTING- L.A.WDNG. 14497 01/23/91 BUENA ENGINEERS INC. 24 L.A. WIDENING - WEST 14498 01/23/91 CA ASSOC FOR LOCAL E 282 C A L E D ANNUAL DUES 14499 01/23/91 CAULDWELL, SUSAN 34 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 14500 01/23/91 CO. OF VENTURA SOLID 654 RECYCLING BANNER 14501 01/23/91 COASTAL SANITARY SUP 40 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 14502 01/23/91 CONTINENTAL LAWYERS 513.MOORPARK VS PACIFICA 7,366.50 7,366.50 14,733.00 17.50 58.80 6 , 234 . 7`_ 3 .2- 16 0( 4,000.0( 5.952.6( 361.6L 129.79 136.00 33.43 21.00 1,604.11 3,908.23 387.77 4,296.00 4,485.50 1,766.00 6,251.50 200.00 26.35 41.48 82.15 100.00 CLAIM INVOICE 1/9/91 1/2/91 1/9/91 1/2/91 *CHECK TOTAL 1/9/91 10/90 1/9/9. 12/90 1/9/9 000502880r 1/9/9" 4063894 y/9 2/5, 01/2" 32 1645( 1/2 L367908000C 1/23 662422 1/23 2/91 1/23 2/91 1/23 1/90 1/23 25791 1/23 61971 1/23 61971 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 1001056 1/23 901146 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 3218 1/23 12/90 1/23 12/90 1/23 33482 1/23 208378 CITY OF MOORPARK GL540R- VO4.03 PACE 2 PO# F 9 S ACCOUNT P N M 003.4.142.904 P N M 011.4.142.904 7 M 033.4.145.992 M 033.4.14b.99` E N D 001.4.11i.6<« F N D 001.4.121.637 F N D 001.4.117.641 F 7 D 033.3.499.495 F N D 001.4.113.642 P N D 011.4.142.904 P N D 011.4.142.904 P N D 027.4.142.903 P N D 027.4.142.903 F N D 001.4.117.634 7 D 001.4.112.637 F N D 058.4.160.629 F N D 051.4.149.623 F N D 003.4.142.903 CITY OF MOORPARK 01/17/91 09:52:27 CHECK# DATE VENDOR BANK OF A. LEVY 14503 01/23/91 COUNTY PRINTING & OF 48 14503 01/23/91 COUNTY PRINTING & OF 48 14503 01/23/91 COUNTY PRINTING Sc OF 48 Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 14504 0 " '2 i; 9' DAB' 111 h. BARW I Ck , LAN 474 VARSITY PARK t+50� 01 23;9' DAVID h. BARWICk,LAN 474 CAMPUS HILLS 14504 01/23/9' DAVIC h. BARWICk,LAN 474 TRACT 4342 PHASE 1145 U 2 3 %9" DAVIE I BARWICF.,LAN 474 RIB CAGE RESTAURANT 45(1 (11'23/9" DAVI[ H. BARWICI, ,LAN 474 SO. VILLAGE PARE 45 5/9" DAv;E r.. BARWiCF ,L _AN 47L. TIFFANY BUSINESS PART +50i 2'i; DAV11, F BARWICk,LAt, 474 TRACT 4147 A SECUF ANNUA_ B i -C Tl HAL,, `i0" [:' A, SECUf QRT, ' BILL-CONE ROON 0; i; ENTENNNAN- R0vit, CG. 04�, EQUI!. CODE ENF. OFFICER 14507 01/23/91 ENTERPRISE /THE 59 EMP. RECRUIT LABORERI &II 14507 01/23/91 ENTERPRISE /THE 59 PUBLIC MTG. NOTICE P &R 14508 01/23/91 ERNST AND YOUNG 257 11/90 SERVICES- 6 /90AUDIT 14509 01/23/91 FRANKLIN ORDER DEPT. 394 OFFICE SUPPLIES 14509 01/23/91 FRANKLIN ORDER DEPT. 394 OFFICE SUPPLIES 14509 01/23/91 FRANKLIN ORDER DEPT. 394 OFFICE SUPPLIES 14510 01/23/91 G I RUBBISH 14510 01/23/91 G I RUBBISH 14510 01/23/91 G I RUBBISH 14510 01/23/91 G I RUBBISH 14511 01/23/91 GILBERT, KENNETH 14511 01/23/91 GILBERT, KENNETH 14511 01/23/91 GILBERT, KENNETH 14512 01/23/91 GREENE, CAROLYN 14513 01/23/91 HARE, RICHARD 14514 01/23/91 1 B M 14514 01/23/91 1 B M 64 12/90 TRASH PICKUP 64 3 PARKS TRASH PICKUP 64 12/90 TRASH PICKUP 64 12/90 TRASH PICKUP 222 TRAVEL & MILEAGE REIMB. 222 TRAVEL & MILEAGE REIMB. 222 TRAVEL & MILEAGE REIMB. 550 TRAVEL & MILEAGE, MEALS 70 TRAVEL & MILEAGE REIMB. 74 1/91 MAINT AGREEMENT 74 EMULATION CONVERSION KIT 407.61 407.61 90.57 905.79 185.00 148.00 148.0( 185.00 148.0( 148.0( 74.0( 036.0( 720.0( 174.0( 894.0( 407.1; 24.48 70.24 94.72 2,560.00 43.75 43.75 9.73 97.23 66.92 345.00 1,204.53 66.92 1,683.37 45.00 90.00 15.00 150.00 63.89 150.00 208.52 691.69 900.21 CLAIM INVOICE 1/23 12/90 1/23 12/90 1/23 12/90 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 10/22/90 1/23 10/22/90 1/23 11/26/9(, 11/26/9(. 1 /2c 11/26/9( 1/2-- 11/26/9(, i /2z- 7/30/9( CHECI TOTA'_ '12' 1103: 1/2% 9157 *CHECI TOTA._ 1/2;; 766c 1/23 12/90 1/23 12/90 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 H1014 1/23 5565705 1/23 5565705 1/23 5565705 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 1/23 1/91 1/23 49651,50052 1/23 50087, 50381 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 1/91 1/23 1/91 1/23 1/91 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 12/90 1/23 1/91 1/23 E409757 1/23 1187558 *CHECK TOTAL CITY OF MOORPARK GL540R- VO4.03 PAGE 3 PO# F 9 S ACCOUNT P N D 001.4.117.621 P N D 041.4.131.62.1 P N D 001.4.148.621 r D (69. 3 . 96 ' . N( F 7 D 039. 3.900.94 F D 039.3.90u.94' P N D D 039.3.90( .9': D 039.5.90(.94 F G o39. .90( .94 r - C 03c.. 90i .14 N D ":,'.,. 1'3 -.u)c F N D u o I .4. 1, 1 .63r P N D 025.4.147.629 F N D 001.4.116.641 P N D 001.4.117.621 P N D 041.4.131.621 P N D 001.4.148.621 P N D 051.4.149.642 P N D 025.4.147.642 P N D 003.4.142.642 P N D 023.4.143.642 P 7 D 001.4.141.637 P 7 D 003.4.142.637 P 7 D 023.4.143.637 F 7 D 058.4.160.632 F 7 D 001.4.117.637 P N D 001.4.117.651 P N D 001.4.117.906 CITY OF MOORPARK CITY OF MOORPARK 01/17/91 09:52:27 Disbursement Journal GL540R- VO4.03 PAGE 4 CHECK# DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F 9 S ACCOU14T BANK OF A. LEVY 14515 01/23/91 IRON MOUNTAIN FORGE 267 32 GAL TRASH CAN HOLDER 2,209.00 1/23 S000058496 P N D 025.4.147.658 14515 01/23/91 IRON MOUNTAIN FORGE 267 32 GALLON CAN WITH LID 259.20 1/23 S000058496 P N D 025.4.147.658 2,468.20 *CHECK TOTAL 1, 1F 01/23/91 4;11EN1'. STEVEN 80 TRAVEL & MILEAGE REIMS, 350.00 1/23 1/91 f 7 D 001.4.112.63; 4`.lE 01'23!9" I•'UENY. STEVEN 8(, MEALS,KIWANIS CLUB DUES 131.96 1/23 1/91 P D 001.4,112.632 481.96 *CHECK TOTAL �i39t DUPE I CATS PMT .CITE 1107" 22.0( 1 !2 = 1/27/9k 0(,- . . III, kt I Mk. MPI. COLLEGE C I TL 25.0( 1/21 P,,EFUNL, CANCELLEL' CHAS: 2'.0( -/2; 12 /9( P• is 49': = __ 4A,. I•, Mt MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 12.2_` /2: 2/91 MOOR PAR _HAMRE 0. 199" ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 10(,.0( •'2_ OU'- 90004 �2, o MOOkPARr NEW, EMP . RECRUIT-LABORER 2.6( 1/2: 12/9L rt !' 00 .. . '. 1 . 14522 01/23/91 MOORPARK NEWS 94 P & R COMM. MTG. NOTICE 23.60 1/23 12/90 F N D 001.4.148.625 14522 01/23/91 MOORPARK NEWS 94 NOTICE OF SEALED BIDS X2 69.30 1/23 12/90 P N D 051.4.142.90 14522 01/23/91 MOORPARK NEWS 94 PUBLIC HEARING 333 44.25 1/23 12/90 P N D 041.4.131.625 14522 01/23/91 MOORPARK NEWS 94 TREE RECYCLING AD 61.95 1/23 12/90 P N D 058.4.160.629 14522 01/23/91 MOORPARK NEWS 94 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 19.25 1/23 12/90 P N D 001.4.117.625 220.95 *CHECK TOTAL 114523 01/23/91 MOORPARK STATIONERS 202 OFFICE SUPPLIES 9.73 1/23 M16425 P N D 001.4.117.621 14523 01/23/91 MOORPARK STATIONERS 202 OFFICE SUPPLIES 9.73 1/23 M16483,M16425 P N D 041.4.131.621 14523 01/23/91 MOORPARK STATIONERS 202 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2.16 1/23 M16484,M16425 P N D 001.4.148.621 21.62 *CHECK TOTAL 14524 01/23/91 NAT'L. LAW ENFORCEME 596 SEMINAR TUITION -2 DEPS. 260.00 1/23 2/91 F N D 001.4.121.637 14525 01/23/91 NEWHOUSE, PHILIP 104 TRAVEL & MILEAGE REIMB. 150.00 1/23 1/91 F 7 D 001.4.134.637 14526 01/23/91 OXNARD AUTO ELECTRIC 307 CHAINSAW REPAIRS 172.50 1/23 H5086737,38,39 F N D 003.4.142.658 14527 01/23/91 PACIFIC BELL 108 45% PHONE #6864 BILL 400.56 1/23 12/90 P N D 001.4.117.653 14527 01/23/91 PACIFIC BELL 108 45% PHONE #6864 BILL 400.56 1/23 12/90 P N D 041.4.131.653 14527 01/23/91 PACIFIC BELL 108 10% PHONE #6864 BILL 89.01 1/23 12/90 P N D 033.4.148.653 14527 01/23/91 PACIFIC BELL 108 PHONE #6947 BILL 11.30 1/23 12/90 P N D 001.4.117.653 14527 01/23/91 PACIFIC BELL 108 FAX #8270 PHONE BILL 22.94 1/23 12/90 P N D 001.4.117.653 14527 01/23/91 PACIFIC BELL 108 FAX #8270 PHONE BILL 22.94 1/23 12/90 P N D 051.4.149.653 14527 01/23/91 PACIFIC BELL 108 FAX #8270 PHONE BILL 5.09 1/23 12/90 P N D 033.4.148.997 14527 01/23/91 PACIFIC BELL 108 PHONE #5092 BILL 10.12 1/23 12/90 P N D 041.4.131.653 14527 01/23/91 PACIFIC BELL 108 PHONE #5953 BILL 78.03 1/23 12/90 P N D 033.4.148.653 14527 01/23/91 PACIFIC BELL 108 PHONE #4910 BILL 5.09 1/23 12/90 P N D 001.4.117.653 14527 01/23/91 PACIFIC BELL 108 PHONE #4910 BILL 5.09 1/23 12/90 P N D 041.4.131.653 14527 01/23/91 PACIFIC BELL 108 PHONE #4910 BILL 1.12 1/23 12/90 P N D 033.4.148.653 1,051.85 *CHECK TOTAL CITY OF MOORPARK 01/17/91 09:52:27 CFIEck# DATE VENDOR BANK OF A. LEVY 14528 01/23/91 POSTAGE BY PHONE 14528 01/23/91 POSTAGE BY PHONE Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 651 POSTAGE METER 651 POSTAGE METER 14529 01/23/91 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL. S 114 MAINTENANCE UNIFORMS 114529 01/23/91 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 114 MAINTENANCE UNIFORMA. 14529 01/23./91 PRUDENTIAL OVERAL S 114 MAINTENANCE UNIFORMS 145Pc, ( ;?3 /c, PRUDENTIA! OVERAI 111: MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 14533 01/23/91 RAPID RAINBOW PHOTO 14534 01/23/91 REID, DENNIS 14534 01/23/91 REID, DENNIS 14535 01/23/91 RICHARDS, PATRICK 14536 01/23/91 RIELA, JOHN 14536 01/23/91 RIELA, JOHN 14537 01/23/91 ROWAN, ALICE 14537 01/23/91 ROWAN, ALICE 111538 01/23/91 S C E DIRECT MAIL 14538 01/23/91 S C E DIRECT MAIL 14538 01/23/91 S C E DIRECT MAIL 14539 01/23/91 SANDRA, BILL 296 FILM -COMM. SVCS. DEPT. 460 1 /91MOBILEHOMERENT RETRO 460 MOBILE HOME RENT SUBSIDY 123 TRAVEL & MILEAGE REIMS. 124 ACCOUNTING SRVCS -28 HRS 124 ACCOUNTING SRVCS-28 HRS 9251 1 /91MOBILEHOMERENT RETRO 9251 MOBILE HOME RENT SUBSIDY 126 SIGNALS ELECTRIC BILL 126 STREETS ELECTRIC BILL 126 PARKS ELECTRIC BILL 9395 REIMB. CANCELLED CLASS 500.00 500.00 1,000.00 30.28 30.28 30.29 29.75 120.6( 1,079.8( 1,083.2( 1,083.2E ?,083.2_- 3.249.74 25.5( 25.50 53.52 53.52 49.51 49.51 257.06 63.75 16.42 38.65 55.07 a c i tIf 980.00 980.00 1,960.00 16.42 38.65 55.07 912.95 141.74 657.67 1,712.36 30.00 CLAIM INVOICE 1/23 11022050 1/23 11022050 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 336102,364465 1/23 336102,364465 1/23 336102,36446`.- 1/23 36301P *CHECF TOTA! 1 /2: 18'1( '2: c' -10 . 1129 9i -10 i/2 9. -1( ICHECr T01k 657( 1/2' 6570 1/23 6572 1/23 6572 1/23 6573 1/23 6573 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 5926102 1/23 1/91 1/23 2/91 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 1/91 1/23 12/27- 1/11/91 1/23 12/27 - 1/11/91 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 1/91 1/23 2/91 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 12/90 1/23 12/90 1/23 12/90 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 01/91 CITY OF MOORPARK GL540R- VO11.03 PAGE 5 PO# F 9 S ACCOUNT P N D 001.4.117.624 P N D 041.4.131.624 P N D 051.4.149.638 P N D 025.4.147.638 P N D 003.4.142.63f, 0i, I Av I N(. i N� D 001.4.1651, 101/1 RF_1 ENT I ON -SPk IN( S P N D 002.4.121.654 h GRAIIAP , A :SSOt ti ANDSCAPC SERVICE: P N D 002.4.121.654 P N GRAHAM a ASSO( 1( LANDSCAPE SERVICES GRAHAM 6 ASSO( ANDSCAPI_ ARC[. SFRVIGE` Comm SPt (,IAl 50_ PRO -100u RADAF GUN ,453 01; 23/9' �- COMM. SPECIALT 505 PRO -1000 RADAR GUN 114532 01/23/91 R.F. COMM. SPECIALTI 505 MPH K -15 RADAR GUN 14532 01/23/91 R.F, COMM. SPECIALTI 505 MPH K -15 RADAR GUN 14532 01/23/91 R.F. COMM. SPECIALTI 505 K -55 RADAR GUN 14532 01/23/91 R.F. COMM. SPECIALTI 505 KK -55 RADAR GUN 14533 01/23/91 RAPID RAINBOW PHOTO 14534 01/23/91 REID, DENNIS 14534 01/23/91 REID, DENNIS 14535 01/23/91 RICHARDS, PATRICK 14536 01/23/91 RIELA, JOHN 14536 01/23/91 RIELA, JOHN 14537 01/23/91 ROWAN, ALICE 14537 01/23/91 ROWAN, ALICE 111538 01/23/91 S C E DIRECT MAIL 14538 01/23/91 S C E DIRECT MAIL 14538 01/23/91 S C E DIRECT MAIL 14539 01/23/91 SANDRA, BILL 296 FILM -COMM. SVCS. DEPT. 460 1 /91MOBILEHOMERENT RETRO 460 MOBILE HOME RENT SUBSIDY 123 TRAVEL & MILEAGE REIMS. 124 ACCOUNTING SRVCS -28 HRS 124 ACCOUNTING SRVCS-28 HRS 9251 1 /91MOBILEHOMERENT RETRO 9251 MOBILE HOME RENT SUBSIDY 126 SIGNALS ELECTRIC BILL 126 STREETS ELECTRIC BILL 126 PARKS ELECTRIC BILL 9395 REIMB. CANCELLED CLASS 500.00 500.00 1,000.00 30.28 30.28 30.29 29.75 120.6( 1,079.8( 1,083.2( 1,083.2E ?,083.2_- 3.249.74 25.5( 25.50 53.52 53.52 49.51 49.51 257.06 63.75 16.42 38.65 55.07 a c i tIf 980.00 980.00 1,960.00 16.42 38.65 55.07 912.95 141.74 657.67 1,712.36 30.00 CLAIM INVOICE 1/23 11022050 1/23 11022050 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 336102,364465 1/23 336102,364465 1/23 336102,36446`.- 1/23 36301P *CHECF TOTA! 1 /2: 18'1( '2: c' -10 . 1129 9i -10 i/2 9. -1( ICHECr T01k 657( 1/2' 6570 1/23 6572 1/23 6572 1/23 6573 1/23 6573 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 5926102 1/23 1/91 1/23 2/91 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 1/91 1/23 12/27- 1/11/91 1/23 12/27 - 1/11/91 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 1/91 1/23 2/91 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 12/90 1/23 12/90 1/23 12/90 *CHECK TOTAL 1/23 01/91 CITY OF MOORPARK GL540R- VO11.03 PAGE 5 PO# F 9 S ACCOUNT P N D 001.4.117.624 P N D 041.4.131.624 P N D 051.4.149.638 P N D 025.4.147.638 P N D 003.4.142.63f, 0i, F N D 001.4.146.629 P 7 D 001.4.117.641 P 7 D 001.4.117.641 F 7 D 041.4.131.637 P 7 D 001.4.116.642 P 7 D 041.4.131.642 P N D 001.4.117.641 P N D 001.4.117.641 P N D 002.4.142.652 P N D 023.4.143.652 P N D 025.4.147.652 F N D 033.3.499.495 P N D 001.4.1651, P N D 002.4.121.654 l N D 001.4.12 ".651, P N D 002.4.121.654 P N D 001.4.121.654 F N D 001.4.146.629 P 7 D 001.4.117.641 P 7 D 001.4.117.641 F 7 D 041.4.131.637 P 7 D 001.4.116.642 P 7 D 041.4.131.642 P N D 001.4.117.641 P N D 001.4.117.641 P N D 002.4.142.652 P N D 023.4.143.652 P N D 025.4.147.652 F N D 033.3.499.495 CITY OF MOORPARK CITY OF MOORPARK 01/17/91 09:52:27 Disbursement Journal GL540R- VO4.03 PAGE 6 CIIECK# DATE VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F 9 S ACCOUNT BANK OF A. LEVY 14540 01/23/91 SATELLITE COPY PRODU 128 CONTRACT RNWL. 9/90 -9/91 1,138.50 1/23 9/90 P N D 001.4.117.622 14540 0112311 SATELLITE COPY PRODU 128 CONTRACT RNWL. 9/90 -9/91 1,138.50 1/23 9/90 P N D 041.4.131.622 111540 01/23/91 SATELLITE COPY PRODU 128 CONTRACT RNWL, 9/90 -9/91 253.00 1/23 9/90 P N D 001.4.148.622 2,530.00 *CHECK TOTAL ShELLABARGEF,, SUSAN 388 TRAVEL $ MILEAGE 1/91 150.00 1/23 1/9' D uU1.4,146.63i =154:. SIGNA,. MAINTENANCE i3': SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 499.45 i/23 11175 N D 002.4.14 .679 I G N k MP I N TENANC! . 3 - SPECIAL REPAIRS 57.36 1 /23 11276 K 1 002. L . 14' . 65`- 556.8" *CHECF TOTAL - F.Ir• A_._E _; r, 6- COMM. CENTER FUSES 1.6 1!2 '12006L 4_ sk,EN 9:_ REFUNE TREE L0- DEPOS I- 300.0( 1,'2_ RECE I P- #4565' J(n 9. - Slr o SUFr _ SIRE-,- Ii.A i NTENANC_ 494.81 1/2' 25451 '. illy �+- - /° SM'Tr LIPL & SUPP._ STREET MAINTENANCE 757.72 1/2: 2549- r. E u02.i.14�_ . - SM, CRED'T- RETURNEC !TEN 210.38CF 1/2 2549= r C'2`- 1,042.20 *CHECF TOTAL �454b o °,i23/9 TANDARD OFFIUt a LO OFFICE SUPPLIES 191.52 1/23 002144,002225 N D 001.4.146.621 14546 01/23/91 STANDARD OFFICE & CO 137 OFFICE SUPPLIES 191.52 1/23 002144,002227 P N D 041.4.131.621 14546 01/23/91 STANDARD OFFICE 5c CO 137 OFFICE SUPPLIES 42.57 1/23 002144,002227 P N D 001.4.117.621 425.61 *CHECK TOTAL 14547 01/23/91 SUN CCMPUTERS 655 4 DESK JET 500 PRINTERS 2,113.61 1/23 0701 - 702342 F N D 001.4.117.906 14548 01/23/91 T.B.W. INDUSTRIES, 1 437 PINS - DEPARTING COUNCIL 17.54 1/23 14244 P N D 001.4.111.629 1451 +8 01/23/91 I.B.W. INDUSTRIES, 1 437 PINS - DEPARTING COUNCIL 17.53 1/23 14244 P N D 041.4.131.629 14548 01/23/91 T.B.W. INDUSTRIES, 1 437 PINS- DEPARTING COUNCIL 17.53 1/23 14244 P N D 001.4.148.629 52.60 *CHECK TOTAL 14549 01/23/91 TELOS CORPORATION 26 PROF SRVCS- JILL -9.25 HRS 601.25 1/23 174775 F N D 001.4.11;'.642 14550 01/23/91 U. S. POSTMASTER 149 THIRD CLASS PERMIT #91FEE 60.00 1/23 1/91 F N D 001.4.117.624 14551 01/23/91 UNOCAL 150 MOTOR FUEL 54.74 1/23 11/90 P N D 023.4.143.655 14551 01/23/91 UNOCAL 150 MOTOR FUEL 50.01 1/23 11/90 P N D 025.4.147.655 14551 01/23/91 UNOCAL 150 MOTOR FUEL 19.63 1/23 11/90 P N D 041.4.131.654 14551 01/23/91 UNOCAL 150 MOTOR FUEL 155.81 1/23 11/90 P N D 003.4.142.655 14551 01/23/91 UNOCAL 150 MOTORCYCLE FUEL 34.49 1/23 11/90 P N D 051.4.121.654 314.68 *CHECK TOTAL 14552 01/23/91 URBAN WEST COMMUNITI 444 TRUST FND CLOSED DEPOSIT 7,438.62 1/23 INSPECTION F N D 039.2.210.2101 14552 01/23/91 URBAN WEST COMMUNITI 444 REIMBURSEMENT T.R.BRIDGE 72,044.46 1/23 12/90 P N D 026.2.210.2101 14552 01/23/91 URBAN WEST COMMUNITI 444 REIMBURSEMENT T.R.BRIDGE 16,500.00 1/23 12/90 P N D 027.2.210.2101 95,983.08 *CHECK TOTAL CITY OF MOORPARK 01/17/91 09:52 :27 CHECK# DATE VENDOR BANK OF A. LEVY 14553 01/23/91 VARIETY LIGHTING SUP 151 14554 01/23/91 VENTURA COUNTY WATER 153 14554 01/23/91 VENTURA COUNTY WATER 153 11 +554 01/23/91 VENTURA COUNTY WATER 153 14551: 01!23/9. VENTIIRC COUNTY WATER 153 U WE PUi - I SH IN( (,OMI 15k ri '_ - '��' WES pUB! I S I NF COMP 1511 T E R r HWr- WH AF. C rIARDWAR W I Ai- _EF HARDWAR WH TAKFF HARDWAR 1455b WILHELM, GEORGE 14558 01/23/91 WIEHEIM, GEORGE BANE: OF A. LEVY Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION AMOUNT LIGHT BULB REPLACEMENTS MEDIANS WATER BILL PARKS WATER BILL COMM CTR WATER BILL COMM CTR WATER BILL CA CODES VOL.38A -END CA EVIDENCE CODE- COMPAC" STREE- SIGN: MAiNTENANCF SUPP,_IE: L MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE` MAINTENANCE SUPPL I E: .9399 REFUND CLASS CCDM 1 .9399 REFUND CLASS MDCD TOTAL 209.04 5,972.86 1,153.02 46.58 46.57 7,219.03 291.3E 7.41; 298.82 23-.0 19. 1' 147.OF 105. 5: 271,.7-- 20. DO 30.00 50.00 183,780.54 CLAIM INVOICE 1/23 41258 1/23 12/90 1/23 12/90 1/23 12/90 1/23 12/90 *CHECK TOTAI 1/2: 564740 8 1/23 5651914E *CHECH TOTAL 2 18684 lb -i? 1 '2 12/91 1/2` 12/91 1/2; 12/9( *CHEC! TOTA. 1/23 1/4/91 1/23 1/4/91 *CHECK TOTAL CITY OF MOORPARK GL540R- VO4.03 PAGE 7 PO# F 9 S ACCOUNT F N D 051.4,149.623 P N D 023.4.143.652 P N D 025.4.147.652 P N D 051 4, 1119. 65,' P N D (101.4.117.65 .63: CITY OF MOORPARK 01/17/91 09:52:27 CHECK# DATE VENDOR REPORT TOTALS: Disbursement Journal DESCRIPTION RECORDS PRINTED - 000182 AMOUNT CLAIM INVOICE 183,780.54 CITY OF MOORPARK GL540R- VO4.03 PAGE 8 PO# F 9 S ACCOUNT CITY OF MOORPARK 01/17/91 09:54:23 Disbursement Journal FUND RECAP: FLIND DESCRIPTION DISBURSEMENTS 001 GENERAL FUND 24,246.98 O02 TRAFFIC SAFETI' 3,193.44 003 GAS TAX 9,119.63 00 PARI- IMPROVEMENTS 3,249.79 till LOCAL TRANSPORTATION STRLETS 11,662.50 L)1,: LOCAL TRANSPORTATION TRANSI 5,952.60 AD 84 -2 LIGHTING MAINTENANCt 6,251.26 ,)21 AD 85 -1, PARKS MAINTENANCE 5511.12 (,2f ' I ERR;, RLJADA SPf; I NL AO( 72,,044.46 02 A AVENUE AO( 23,831.3C k'i: RECREATION 465.62 3: TRUST FUND b,774.62 C:OMMUNiTv Dl ✓E "_UPMFN 8,687.73 vANN ^UN[. 622.1- SO-i! WAST: MANACEMFN 167.3 Tr.. AL.. - UND: 183,780,54 BANK RECAP: BANK - - -- NAME ---------------------------- DISBURSEMENTS BANK BANK OF A. LEVY 183,780.54 TOTAL ALL BANKS 183,780.54 CITY OF MOORPARK GL060S- VO4.03 RECAPPAGE GL540R CITY OF MOORPARK 01/17/91 09:55:30 Schedule of Bills (Fund) FUND RECAP: FUND - - -- DESCRIPTION --------------- ------- - - - - -- DISBURSEMENTS 001 GENERAL FUND 24,246.98 002 TRAFFIC SAFETY 3,193.44 003 GAS TAX 9,119.63 005 PARK IMPROVEMENTS 3,249.79 01l LOCAL TRANSPORTATION STREETS 11,662.50 012 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION TRANSIT 5,952.60 023 AD 84 -2 LIGHTING MAINTENANCE 6,251.26 025 AD 85-1 PARKS MAINTENANCE 5,511.12 026 TIERRA REJADA/ SPRING AOC 72,044.46 027 L A AVENUE AOC 23,831.30 033 RECREATION 465.62 035 TRUST FUND 8,774.62 04" COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN' 8,687.73 05" GANN FUNC 622.17 05E SOLID WASTE MANAGEMEN- 167.32 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 183,780.54 BANK RECAP: BANK NAME DISBURSEMENTS - - -- ---------------------------- BANK BANK OF A. LEVY 183,780.54 TOTAL ALL BANKS 183,780.54 THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT. DATE ............ APPROVED BY .. ............................... CITY OF MOORPARK GI.06OS-VO11.03 RECAPPAGE GI -54OR PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tern SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MOORPARK M E M O R A N D U M cTEM �. e. M,OORPARK, CAUFORNIA STEVEN KUENY City CotX1CA Meeting City Manager CHERYL J.KANE of 199L, City Attorney PATRI RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. ACTIO Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: January 15, 1990 (Council Meeting 1- 23 -91) SUBJECT: Approve Revision to Certain Language in the Contract for Materials Testing (ref: Avenida Colonia and Nogales) OVERVIEW This recommends approval of a change to certain language set forth in an Agreement for Professional Services. DISCUSSION At your last meeting the City Council approved the execution of an Agreement for professional services to perform certain materials testing required during the construction of the Los Angeles Avenue Widening Project [East]. Certain language pertaining to Errors & Omissions was deleted from the Agreement by the Contractor. This language has been deleted from Agreements entered into in the past for similar services. The approval of the recommended change would make the language set forth in this Agreement consistent those past documents. Prior to execution of the Agreement by the Mayor, it is appropriate that the City Council concur with this language change. Approve the deletion of certain language at the bottom of page 2 of the Agreement. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 19 by and between the City of Moorpark, a municipal corporation located in the County of Ventura, State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Geolabs- - Westlake Village, a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "GEOLABS ". W I T N E S S E T H Whereas, City requires certain geotechnical services to be performed in support of construction engineering for the construction of the Avenida Colonia / Nogales Avenue improvements; and, Whereas, Geolabs is experienced in providing such services and has submitted a Proposal relating thereto; and, Whereas, City wishes to retain Geolabs for the performance of those services set forth in said Scope of Work set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual convents, benefits and premises herein stated, the parties hereto agree as follows: City does hereby appoint Geolabs in a contractual capacity to perform certain technical services as set forth herein. I. Scone of Work The services to be rendered by Geolabs shall be as set forth in the Proposal from Geolabs with the revised date of December 10, 1990 (Exhibit "A"). Said services shall be performed in accordance with any written and / or verbal instructions given to Geolabs by the City Engineer's Office prior to said Proposal date. II. Compensation The amount of full compensation to Geolabs for said services shall be as set forth in Paragraph 4 of the Proposal from Geolabs dated December 10, 1990, (Exhibit "A"). -1- '-1I-O2 II. Termination This agreement may be terminated with or without cause by City at any time with no less than 10 days written notice of such termination. In the even of such termination, Geolabs shall be compensated for such services up to the date of termination. Such compensation for work in progress shall be prorated as to the percentage of progress completed at the date of termination. This agreement may be terminated by Geolabs only by providing City with written notice no less than 30 days in advance of such termination. III. General Conditions A. City shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salary, wage or other compensation to any person employed by Geolabs performing services hereunder for City. B. Geolabs is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees, servants or agents shall control over the conduct of Geolabs or any of Geolabs officer, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. Geolabs shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner employees of the City. C. At the time of 1) termination of this agreement or 2) conclusion of all work; all original documents, designs, drawings, reports, calculations, diskettes, computer files, notes, and other related materials whether prepared by Geolabs or their subcontractors) or obtained in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this agreement shall become the sole property of the City. D. Geolabs shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend the City and its officers, employees, servants and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Director of Public Works, Assistant City Engineer, City Engineer or City Attorney from any claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense, for any damage whatsoever, including but not limited to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, resulting from rC misconduct, negligent acts, errors - �r- �rnri- s�- i�rr.� of i,` � 71: -2- '1,i. Geolabs or any of its officers, employees or agents in the performance of this agreement, except such damage as is caused by the sole negligence of the City or any of its officers, employees, servants or agents. The City does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may have against Geolabs by reason of Paragraph E hereof, because of the acceptance by the City, or the deposit with the City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this agreement. This hold harmless and indemnification provision shall apply regardless of whether or not said insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense described in Paragraph E hereof. E. Geolabs shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for, and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this agreement that policies of insurance required by this paragraph and shall furnish to the City Clerk of the City certificates of said insurance on or before the commencement of the term of this agreement. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in any of said policies or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the protection offered by the policies shall: 1. Name the City and its officers, employees, servants and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Director of Public Works or City Attorney, as additional insured with Geolabs. 2. Insure the City and its officers, employees, and agents while acting in the scope of their duties under this agreement against all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses arising from, or in any way connected with, the performance of this agreement by Geolabs or the City. 3. Bear an endorsement or have attached a rider whereby it is provided that, in the event of cancellation or amendment of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by mail, postage prepaid, not less than thirty ( 30 ) days before the cancellation or amendment is effective. Geolabs shall give City thirty (30) days written notice prior to the expiration of such policy. 4. Be written on an Occurrence Basis. -3- F. Consistent with the provisions of Paragraph E, Geolabs shall provide general public liability including automobile liability and property damage insurance in an amount not less than One Million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and annual aggregate. G. Consistent with the provisions of Paragraph E, Geolabs shall provide workers' compensation insurance as required by the California Labor Code. If any class of employees engaged by Geolabs in work under this agreement is not protected by the workers' compensation law, Geolabs shall provide adequate insurance for the protection of such employees to the satisfaction of the City. H. Geolabs shall not assign this agreement, or any of the rights, duties or obligations hereunder. It is understood and acknowledged by the parties that Geolabs is uniquely qualified to perform the services provided for in this agreement. I. The Proposal submitted by Geolabs dated December 10, 1990 (Exhibit "A"), are hereby incorporated into this agreement. Where said exhibit is modified by this Agreement, the language contained in this Agreement shall take precedence. J. Payment to Geolabs shall be made by City within 30 days of receipt of invoice, except for those which are contested or questioned and returned by City, with written explanation within 30 days of receipt of invoice. Geolabs shall provide to City a written response to any invoice contested or questioned and further, upon request of City, provide City with any and all documents related to any invoice. K. Any notice to be given pursuant to this agreement shall be in writing, and all such notices and any other document to be delivered shall be delivered by personal service or by deposit ir? the United States mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, and addressed to the party for whom intended as follows: To: City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Attn: City Manager -4- = To: Geolabs - Westlake - 742 HampsYri're -Rd: Suite C - Westlake Village, -CA 9136.1 _ = Attn r Timothy-Y.- Casey - Either ^party( -may; _from time to- time, _bz written notice --to- the- - other, designate :a different-.-address which ,A acshai1 -1�7be Substituted- for.- the---one above -- specified. -Y --' —Notices, _- payments and _other =documents,-sh -all be deemed - delivered upon receipt by personal service or upon deposi:ta in the United States mail. L. Nothing contained in this agreement shall be deemed, construed or represented by the City or Geolabs or by any third person to create the relationship of principal or agent, - -or of a partnership, - or of a joint venture, or -of - any other association of any kind or nature between the City and Geolabs. M. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties concerning the subject matter hereof and all prior agreements or understandings, oral or written, are hereby merged herein. This agreement shall not be amended in any way except by a`-writing expressly purporting to - be such an amendment, signed and acknowledged by both of the parties hereto. N. Should interpretation of this agreement, or any portion thereof, be necessary,-:it is deemed that this agreement was prepared by the parties jointly and equally, and shall not be interpreted against either party on the ground that the party prepared the agreement or caused it to be prepared. O. No waiver of any provision of this agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision. No waiver shall be binding, unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. P. In the event any action, suit or proceeding is brought for the enforcement of, or the declaration of any right or obligation pursuant to this agreement or as a result of any alleged breach of any provision of this agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, from the losing party, and any judgement or decree rendered in such a proceeding shall include an award thereof. -5- Q. Cases-involving a. dispute-between the City and Geolabs may be decided by an arbitrator if both sides-agree in writing, , with-:;-. costs proportional to -.the judgement of the arbitrator: R. This agreement is made, entered into, executed in Ventura -County, ..California, and any action filed _in any--court:—),on fori,- arbitration ',for. -. the interpretation, enforcement or other- action of --the terms,- conditions or covenants referred to herein shall be filed in the applicable court in Ventura County, California — S. The captions and: headings of the, various_ Articles and Paragraphs of this agreement are for convenience and identification only and shall not be deemed to limit or define -the content of the respective Articles and Paragraphs.hereof. IV. RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL The individual: directly responsible for - Geolabs overall performance of the contract provisions herein above set forth and.to serve as principal liaison between City and Consultant shall be Robert Burke. Upon mutual written agreement of the parties, other individuals may be- substituted in the above capacity. _ V. IMPLEMENTATION ~: v The City shall provide Geolabs with written notice in advance of the date at which these services are to be implemented if different than the date of the agreement. CITY OF MOORPARK: CONSULTANT: EOLABS- 1IESTLA AGE Paul W. Lawrason Jr., Mayor ROBERT BURi{E,PRESIDENT geolab_2 WIC EX HIBIT A GEOLABS - WESTLAKL VILI..��E Foundcation czn-_1 Soil.,3 Engineering, Geology S \l ltw C=' 'Nr =lla JCc VIII CIV.E. r-A CA <o]o)uuv -»�� - .n -,,a •i o - <,o-. ruY ca oo)a�v_�i,03 - v d bra raI at rt rt Swrvli'!+b Cc »�,r it110u December 10, 1990 Wildan and Ascociatoa 371 Poli Streat, Suite 101 Ventura, California 91361 ATTENTION: Mark Whitgraff SUBJECT: Proposal for Cwotoohnical Investigation and Testing for Streat Improvements Phase I and Phase II, Noglas Avanuo and Avenida Colonia, Moorpark, California GENTLEMEN: Pursuant to your request, we have prepared this proposal for a gcotaohrical investigation with subsequent grading and testing on tha subject property. The scope of work is based upon our knowledge of the site, the proposed grading as illustrated in tte plans provided to our office by Mark whitgraff or Nildan and Associates, and our understanding of project schedule and require- ments. The site work consists of the construction of street improve- ments, including utility line replacement and placement of subgrade and base, for Phases I and !I. In addition to the improvements and testing, Phase II will include rough grading. Our investigation will emphasize these elements, so that their impact upon your project may be assessed. we proposed to utilize a back-hoe to expose the subsurface materials at selected locations. Selected samples from the excavations will be submitted for testing in our laboratory. Upon evaluation of the assembled data, we will prepare a written report EXhISIT A wildan and Associarna -2- Decenber 1C, 1990 which will ccntain our findings, opinions, and recommendations considered pertinent to the proposed development. We. will endeavor to keep you and the project civil engineer appraised of our findings throughout the course of the study so the elements encountered can be incorperated into the plans and project budget. Submittod herewith is our estimated cost of the geotechnical sarvices that will be required during the Qevelopment of the subject cite. We are basing this proposal on the normal amount of testing associated with projects of this nature. A quick synopsis is given below: 1. Grading Plan Review: This office will review tho proposed grading plan and provide a written report. The report will include, but not limited to, the following: 1) subsurface excava- tion 2)appropriate laboratory testing; 3)enginoaring analysis,, 4)grading and street recommendations. 2. Rouah Grading: we presume that rough grading of Phase IT will be completed in five working daya. Our hourly rate includes periodic inspections during fill placement with related supervi- sion, engineering, and laboratory maxes. Alao included during rough grading ue will perform "R" Values for street design, and a final compaction and report that will combine both Phase I and Pnase Il. - ' 3. st;e$t Utility Sa.2kfi11c Includes a test for each three foot Of backfill for ovary 300 feet of main line backfill, and one test for Qvery third lateral placed in the street right -or-way. One final report covering all the utility testing will be submitted fcr the entire project. EXHIBIT A W,.1dan arid'-Aissociates- December 10, 1990 - 4. TM -Includes one•test 'or-every 300 feet Per two Lana of trar:ic and every 3co feet for curb and gutter !3ubgrade and base. Also included is the laboratcr,7 iCastinq of imported base. one rival report will be issued for the entire project. our services for the above will be performed at the fallowing rates. __it should be, noted that the below costs are for passing �z tests onlly.- . Therefore '-the- costs of all 'Lailing test and /or inspections will be considered an extra which we suggest your firm pass on to the appropriate contractor. GRADING PLAN REVIEW Cost' ior-'RQ-Port ROUGH GMkDING PHASE zI Principal Engineer............ 4 hrs @ 85 /hr....$- 340.00 Staff-Pnginaer and Ce Field Technician-Miscellaneous (Claaring,Fino Grading,ect,'), 20 hr3 :L,000.00, Final Report., ............ I rpts@$ 750 /rpt...$ 750.00 ------------- Subtotal; $ 2,310.o o STREET IJTTT-.j L! TESTING PHAsF T MO pHAc;p TT Princ,pal'Engi,-1eer ............ 2 hrs @S 85 /h i 170.00 Staff Engineer ................. 4 hrs @$ 55 /hr .... $ 220.00 Field Technician .............. 8 hrs @$ 50 /hr .... $ 400.00 Fina! Report .................. I rpt Os 300 /rpt ... 5 300.00 ------------ Subtotal: 1,090.00 STREL?T rMFROVEMF!U—T'ZST1NG Crinc-Lpal Engineer............ 4 hrs a$ 85 /hr ....6 340.03 Staff Engineer ................ 6 hrc OS 55 /hr ....$ 330.00 laboratory... ............. 6 hrg 50 /hr.$ 300.00 Field ' d Technician ------------- 12 hrs So 600.Co 1, inal Report .................. I rpt 100 /rpt ... $ 300.00 ------------ Subtotal: 1,370. 0 TOTALS 6,520.00 EXHIBIT A Wdldan and Aasotiat_es �4- December 10, 3.990 =- Since Our- QztvicA� re lyo apon -.the craality-,Zrd gaan ity bi = th�a= 'aarthwd�k arform�d by,'your 3aboontz-actor; -.it. i3 entirely posaiblo that -r our - tot.-xI Goat- -;nay rtsn,e Eton = - $5,500. OD to `= Itt)9houler- be l -notod that --you will-be- biTlod onl, for the actual t'ire spent on -the job -which will be:-verified by daily tinQ tickets signed by your =field representative. Also, -the above ra't8e- are = appl3�oable"-to - June _'2, 1991;= with the rates after that time being increased by To% annually for all:work -not. reasonably completed-.-'- - _ -- , = - - _ - . - _ . :.. - If this proposal meets your approval, please sign and return the eziclosed Mark- Order- and -Agreement so we- may proceed. Please feel free to contact this office should you haves any questions."-- Respectful 2y,- submitted: 41r GEOLABS-WESTLFIKE VILLAGE Timothy F. .Casey4 g _ield supervisor Secret& TFC/ dW Enclosure: Agreement and Work Order XC: (2) Addressee EXHIBIT A - GEOLABS - WESTLA E VILLAGE] 742 H2mpehire Road, Suite C, Westlake V!71an. CA 91361 (80.5) 495 2197 (818) 889 2562 FAX (845) 379 2603 AGREEMENT AND WORK ORDER 'HE l NOERSItiNtQ (FtEFi!tNA MR REFERRED TO AS'CJ'cNT) H6A;:BY Rr'TAW 6 THr; 6ERVICES OF R & q SF-RM ES CORP.'EVTl:vtc' /1LAGE, LPCN' E FCLLC'rrNO'ERMSANo =,\CfrC,NS: � AB I T,oF CF-'CS- nEEQTI;CNNICAL Z. J03 51TE: Lnt /Pucvl 11/A Trv:! /Parcel MdD Jln LAS A` N c A AV�NI A IA kl ORPAR i c,reet a.7dn.a itY unry 6tate ap Ccca 1. AEC6IVED FROM, 'ILDA 'AND A °4GCIATES MARK WHITGRAFF fmama/uornrwy Agent nne L51y-f —T 1 VENTURA. L; F asset Ad�rors city ate p a6f 4. FEES, COSTS AND L3TIMATe; A . FEtr_3: Pfit'0 pal engine« /Qeologiot: Stat1 Enolnew,10aciagist: Laboratory. Tedlnldan.• e.QL00 -_ per hour i—%g•00 _ pet hour 50.00 per hour t_ 50.00 Per hour To "idol OveRirru Rate S N / A per hour ;lime in ex=M of 8 hours in arty given day or time on Saturday, Sunday or Hadpya) A Willonat work such ere Plan revtew, field obaarvadons and testing. etc, are billed 4t stated ratee with 2 hour minimum W field Inspeedom The above fees and Overtime rates an wojeet to ch&NO if the PafCUlBf claasNlcattOn of personnel sat forth strove raceiv� an hourly rate Incmwje by virhre cx =0r uniOnIntion or lawn domarec. B. COSTS: Nilloac• tJO /mil• %erox PAto $ 20 /copy Typing $1, �1Pas• Postage & Btuoprlyd at Est Qrtu>np aria EOulptnertt Rental Cost plus 139E to s2wo Cast p" 10% for amount of cost abov9 S2Wo R•tmner. --N-/A- C. 62 ,MATE OP FEE6 AND C0378: 5_ rJ. 1500 co - % ECO .Q • Sae Proposal dated DFC -cMBER 10. foao 0 Inciucirg equ;pme,t rrvo+..e VON be r•nderad T dur" PrO9+ess &V Mon oornoieltom Tertna to b- 0 Net cash on or bafore *_h# 1"- day fo: lowing mailing of 1nvnicq. 0 Cash upon e0mF"0*n of the report as Irtdltated In No. I above. All State &:•+d IOCaI rues end r*Gufanons ara subjsot to Chang ing ncerpntitione; :'nereforo, U e esilmnte fie sootier CCe3 nct irtCiuda any adtflllonal time onion mt f _e required ds a Mutt O',nijaings drld oonCIUBiCna ct Mats and loess a�sn:.ee, ooerdy or oftlCera r,* ee tatin9 furt.m 11etV!c j3 of 4EOLABS -WES LAKE VILLAGE, Where applicable, ss!es tau 1 e added to all pro!essionwl charges. lYork Authorized and Requested by: Aoaeptod: R ii R,$enrk Corp; die otA+oq�. LAKF-Vluace i3.gr3 ;�'aI 4.111 OF YAe Trio: 3ECR1 --.�.A r r Ce:od� Dated: DECEMBER 'p, 1990 P��L' 1C1121_AL ADDITtQNAt TFRMS Ayp COADITION$ ON OTHER 910E S PEAF0;;LUWCEt EXHIBIT A All worst performed hereundor 4heil be porformed In a proissi —al manner in acoprCanrP with rxogni2ed starmards NO the Of0feONon, Work shag began as noon as pooaiblo follow ;N ro"10 of uJis ettecuted AGREEMENT okND WORK OFID-�R. Arty esinsto suOM11 d herein is not t0n:rdorW A fJrm bid and is subject. to change where ur..usual or u.7torsaen',&meats CeYV0;). tt dt urt.:er6=c1 turd agresci that ail work p9rformed snail Ca bUteci at the dasipna:&d rata, rt Is a;rvea Nat the d;ont w:N ho,d `•srrr esa a ^d Inuernrtiry C FZ:)t_..3SWESTLAtCE YIL;,;CE irom any and all Claims, aerr anal. oer! cQes w iiaG; ;!y ane.ng o.t of Of !n oonrootion witn d&+nages wuaed by 13 _OLABS NESTL.Ai;E VILLAGE or its agents to aascrxnts, uncergrrund "Hilt'&&, ;+Pa ,insa, to oubeunnos strvot,rea. unloee suon ma'rors are o;ow000a to OCCLABS- WISIrLAKE VILLAGE Drtor to comm0ncemen1 bf work. G. FORCE MAJUERC: GfiOLAB- WEGTtAx: VILLAGE shall not Ce r nponsit>4 f:k ns tallure to perform hereunder as a result of aocld9nt. Acts of Cod, puWio ensmioe, labor dr?f:ouitita, etrl5ee, ri=. dyU Oornmocon, ir1tsrter9n:0 by governrn*M adenaes Or any other act reaxoru bly bayorut the oortroi of GEOLABSAWSTLAKE VIL A,3E. 7. PROFESSIONAL OPINION: it is agroea that an '&Porte submitted hereunder art the prrWessianal Coniors of GEOtABS wESTU+xE VILLAOE bawd upon soil ooeervattons reveaf9d at boring locations, artd re�nn" f oe or oumound TLAX , The op alone and r000mrnend"Ono or GEOLABSHrE8TLAKE VILLAGE may not o==0 with thost of State or local epenoies: they may be more rontri= vo or loer reatriotive. It Is agreed that GEOLABSAvESTLAKE VILLAGE is not responsible for tttt effect t11 unknowns attest >s acts Of ether& on a4a :ant propeniae, vpriabiox of nature Inaudirp put not limited to of t M ek &s, masking 0f rooks by beery orouna covet or Inc wtxxa of roan, A= Of Goa ana other vartables beyond the coirroi Of GcpCl,BS WES T LAKrs WLLAGF. may nave on any opinion 11&11081901 hefeunutr. hit: expl9ss or impti't , Of GE ice are plvM hereunder wtrt tapard to eels oondkiona V Mt the excopftn oI locatlong wnW nave been dated; and than only to the extent of such boartpa does GECY,4ac WeSTLAKZ VILL'�GZ warrant is work. 9. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS OR CONDrWNS: OEOLABSWESTLl,K_ VILLAGE is not retponoibio for Drop" bound" loostions urbss such are stav and dearly rnarkvd prior 10 Halo exploration. &Y=a t. ATT0Rtiey3' PGCS: In the event OI default of any of the terms of thla contraet, the nOn d6fauKLtp party ehat! be entYJed to roaeonabi0 nborneye' fees irrourtep In the snloicement of this %oreernent, Wn01het or not an a.°tlon io fi:o:, Or Wbit0011 Oommenoso, plus any related costs and expenw of enforcement that they be Incurred. Including Interest at Ina PrOVAINrtp rate f " the data payment b000mec due. 10. ARBITRATION: Any controversy arisino out of or relating :o this contraot, or braaoh thereof, and which rsx eeda :n: juriedictionai limits of Small Ceims Court shag ba settled by arbltradon In Accordance with the Cornmarc,at Arbitration Futes of the Amorioan A bltratoxt Assoc atlon, and juagemem upon the award renderea by the arChrater,Ss? May be entered in any court haying Jurisdiction thereof. 11. CONTROLLING LAWt Th(s apraertent shad he intorproted and enfo,oed under the sews os tiw watr of Cdll1om19. 12. NOTICE: `Under the mam"cs' Uen I 'ew (Glifwnls Code o! Chit "rocxsurv, Se- t ;l i tat et seq.) any con - radar. sub oonnaCtot, laborer, 9uCpfier er other person wno helps to ;mpr�ve your oroperry bur is not pad fer r, s worK or eupptios. has a right to entoroe a Cialm against your property. TWs marts t,st after a :ours hoaring, your property could be sod by a oourt o r1cot eno rw p vVt+eds of the sa a t184d t0 :acsty tn0 irtrsDteanaes. is can happen &van If you Kara pad yr�tr Own convaotor in full, if t).6 3vboontractor, IabOmr, or supplier remain; unpaid'. This will Irerva AS lWm.al nOtice o' cur h4OCMAkA lien entrt�ernonl. 13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Instrument xnialns the entire egreernon, of the parties. k May not be ch &Ned orally but Only in whin; signed byths parry agelnat whom entorCF>rnJnr of the waiver, Change. nlPdificsLCn, extans;nn, or a &charge is sought. Client: R &,A Seryioe3 Corp., dlbp �ECLAEIS- WESTLAKE VILLAGE: date: �--- "I ; date: pEC�r,ABEFi 10 1�. PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tem SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MOORPARK M E M O R A N D U TO: The Honorable City Council ITEM.6 so. MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA City C Mesflng STEVEN KUENY of ��-1 City Manager ACTION: CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of ommunity Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police M RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: January 14, 1991 (Council Meeting 1- 23 -91) SUBJECT: Acceptance of Repairs to Certain Sidewalks Throughout the City (ref: Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter Repair Project No. 90 -1 OVERVIEW T(JQ- This presents for approval the Notice of Completion for the subject project. DISCUSSION A. Background Street trees on certain residential streets caused damage to the sidewalks. A project was developed to remove these damaged sidewalks, prune tree roots where required and install root barriers to prevent or curtail the reoccurrence of the problem. Last June the City Council awarded a contract to Valencia Construction for this work. B. Final Inspection and Acceptance The Director of Public Works has completed a final inspection of the subject improvements. With the completion of certain repair work by City and other forces (payment for which has been deducted from the Contract via a Credit Change Order in the amount of $400.00), the necessary sidewalk repair work has been completed. At this time it would be appropriate for the City Council to accept this repair work as completed, direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion and authorize release of the retention. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 City Council Acceptance of Sidewalk Reconstruction Page 2 C. Fiscal Impact 1. Contractor Payments to Date: Total Due Payments to Date Amount of Retention 2. Total Project Cost Summary: Budget (Acc #:03 -142- 903 - 0095): Constr. Contract: Bid Amount $46,537.20 C.O. #1: H/C Ramp 996.00 C.O. #2: Credit (400.00) Actual Qty Adj: 1,703.39 Total: Design Review (Willdan) Printing Arborist Inspection (Willdan) Total D. Notice to Withhold $48,836.59 $40,878.95 $48,836.59 300.00 240.00 1,250.00 4,711.00 $7,957.64 $80,000.00 $55,337.59 The City has received a Notice to Withhold from the Office of the State Labor Commissioner. This Notice directs the City to withhold $7,800.00 from payments due to the Contractor to assure payment of certain penalties being assessed the Contractor by that Office. The amount of the retention remaining after the deduction of this claim is $157.67. RECOMZ'IENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Accept the work as completed and instruct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion for the project. 2. Direct Staff to coordinate efforts necessary to insure proper compliance with the Notice to Withhold filed by the State Labor Commissioner. 3. Direct Staff to withhold any retention amount in excess of said claim, said amount to be applied to any City legal costs which may be incurred. 4. Authorize the release of any remaining retention subsequent to the resolution of said claim. NOTICE OF COMPLETION Notice pursuant to Civil Code Section 3093, must be filed within 10 days after completion (See reverse side for Complete requirements.) Notice is hereby given that: 1. The undersigned is owner or corporate officer of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described: 2. The full name of the owner is City of Moorpark 3. The full address of the owner is 799 Moorpark Avenue _ Moorpark, CA 93021 4. The nature of the interest or estate of the owner is; In fee. Purchaser under contract of Purchase (If other than fee, strike "In fee' and insert, for example. 'purchaser under contract of purchase," or "lessee ") 5. The full names and full addresses of all persons. if any, who hold title with the undersigned as fcint tenants or as tenants in common are: NAMES ADDRESSES 6 A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on January 15, 1991 _ The work done was: Re- construction of sidewalks and installation of root barriers 7. The name of the contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was Valencia Construction 25520 W. Stanford Ave., Suite 309, Valencia, CA 91355 If no contractor for wor, of imprc— le nt as a whelp, �nsert ' non. ] — 20-90 (1 of Centracl) 8. The property on which said work of improvem -nl was completed is In ttr� city of Moorpark County of - Ventura _- --- Stall ;,f California. and is described as 1cl' ^.w, various streets throughout the City 9. The street address of said property is _ N/A ilf ro st•eet addras% ba; CP n r assigned insert Dated. Verification for Individual Owner :u' -f Owner or corporate officer rf ra.�er »TFd in paragraph 7 or hi, avent BERNARDO M.PEREZ Mayor SCOTT MONTGOMERY Mayor Pro Tern ELOISE BROWN Councilmember CLINT HARPER, Ph.D. Councilmember PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr. Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk TO FROM: DATE: MOORPARK .: C � CALI�pRNiq Meeffrp of Z 194 ACTION: 1!%1'I�Jtr, a �_ MEMORANDUM The Honorable City Council Philip E. Newhouse, Director of Services January 17, 1991 ITEM. STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer Community SUBJECT: Consider Authorizing Staff to Solicit Bids for Capital Improvements at Campus, Glenwood and Griffin Parks BACKGROUND: At your November 7, 1990 Council meeting, Council approved entering into a contract with R.W. Graham & Associates for the preparation of construction drawings, bid documents and specifications for the construction of various park capital improvements at Campus, Glenwood and Griffin Parks. The capital improvements to be constructed are as follows: 1. Campus Park: $58,800: A. Concrete walkways $ 25,000 B. Drinking fountain $ 1,000 C. Half basketball court $ 8,500 D. Picnic table seat replacement $ 500 E. Playground equipment $ 7,800 F. Restroom sky light $ 5,000 G. Security lighting $ 8,000 H. Trees $ 3.000 TOTAL: $ 58,800 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 The Honorable City Council Page 2 January 17, 1991 2. Glenwood Park: $17,600: A. Bicycle rack $ 500 B. Concrete /playground $ 5,000 C. Drinking fountain $ 1,800 D. Picnic tables and barbecues $ 2,000 E. Play equipment $ 5,000 F. Trash receptacles $ 800 G. Trees $ 2,500 TOTAL: $ 17,600 3. Griffin Park: $75,750: A. Basketball court with lights $ 27,000 B. Bicycle rack $ 500 C. Concrete /playground $ 6,000 D. Concrete /walkways $ 12,650 E. Picnic tables /barbecues $ 3,000 F. Play equipment $ 10,300 G. Security lighting $ 12,800 H. Trees $ 3,000 I. Volleyball court $ 500 TOTAL: $ 75,750 GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PARKS: $152,150 Staff has been informed by Mr. Graham the necessary documents for solicitation of bids to develop the capital improvements have been completed, and the City can proceed with acquiring bids for this project. Staff has reviewed the bid documents and plans and is satisfied all is in order. Approval to solicit bids Advertise for bids Review bids Award bid Commence work Complete Glenwood Park Complete Campus Park Complete Griffin Park 1/23/91 1/28 to 2/26/91 2/26 to 3/1/91 3/6/91 3/25/91 4/26/91 6/21/91 7/5/91 A copy of the plans and specifications are available for review in the City Clerk's office. The Honorable City Council Page 3 January 17, 1991 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to proceed with solicitation of bids for development of the park capital improvements. PEN:db PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tom SCOTT MONTGOMERY Counciimember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk TO: FROM: DATE: MOORPARK I7EM#*5, r-.- The Honorable City John F. Knipe, City January 16, 1991 MO0APAW- CAUFCOM CHy CWW1 11w%@*V of MEMORANDUM M-L STEVEN KUENY cay Martapar ERYL J. KANE CKA"n" CK RICHARDS. A.LG.P. Director of ib�DevelloprWo JOHN F. KNIPE City EngW~ JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE THE POINDEXTER AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECT FOR PUBLIC BIDDING BACKGROUND INFORMATION The subject project will install a traffic signal system with safety lighting at the intersection of Moorpark Avenue - Poindexter Avenue /First Street. This traffic signal will provide north and southbound left turn lanes and phasing. In addition, all four curb returns of the intersection will be widened and a concrete crossgutter across First Street will be constructed as part of this project. The City Engineering staff prepared the plans, specifications, and contract documents for this project. Plan approval and issuance of the necessary encroachment permit from Caltrans is expected by the Council meeting date. The construction cost estimate for this project is $122,000. Plans and specifications are on file in the office of the City Clerk. To construct the traffic signal as soon as possible, staff recommends that the City procure the signal poles and controller instead of having the contractor provide this material. As the following table indicates, the project schedule can be shortened by approximately two months. Authorization to Bid Open Bids Award Project Execute Contract Begin Procurement Begin Construction Project Completion With City With Contractor Equipment Procurement Equipment Procurement January 23, 1991 February 25, 1991 March 6, 1991 April 1, 1991 May 1, 1991 June 15, 1991 January 23, 1991 February 25, 1991 March 6, 1991 April 1, 1991 April 1, 1991 July 1, 1991 August 15, 1991 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 Page -2- RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the advertisement of public bids for the construction of the Poindexter Avenue traffic signal project and direct staff to procure the necessary signal equipment to accelerate the project schedule. Copy: Steve Kueny, City Manager Patrick Dobbins, Assistant City Engineer Mark Wessel, City Traffic Engineer JFK:PMD:sf 01804/0222 IMO399.COU MOORPARK ITEM .F,3 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA Mayor City C A "Irg BERNARDO M. PEREZ of 199,1 Mayor Pro Tem SCOTT MONTGOMERY ACTIIO Councilmember k� JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember BY LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: John F. Knipe, City Enginee DATE: January 16, 1991 SUBJECT: CALTRANS SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA 118/23 FREEWAY CONNECTOR PROJECT BACKGROUND INFORMATION STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer Following the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake in Northern California, City Council requested additional information concerning the seismic design of the 118/23 Freeway Connector project. The information received from Caltrans was forwarded to City Council on December 13, 1990. In this submittal, Caltrans supplied a copy of their Bridge Design Specifications for seismic design and the geotechnical report for this project. Overall, staff finds the Caltrans information and design methodology acceptable. DISCUSSION As requested by City Council, staff has continued to work with Caltrans to obtain additional information on the seismic design of the 118/23 Freeway Connector Project since the 1989 earthquake. This information, received on December 10, 1990, was prepared by the Division of Structures located in the Caltrans' Sacramento office. Upon receipt, this information was then forwarded to the City Engineer's Structural Division for review. Their review concludes that the design methodology described is acceptable and similar to that performed throughout the State in both the public and private sectors. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 Page -2- As noted in the cover letter, Caltrans employed a computer program called STRUDL (Structural Design Language) for the seismic analysis of the bridge structure. This program, developed at MIT, is highly regarded and used extensively in the structural design community. Their use of STRUDL on the 118/23 Connector Project indicates it received state -of -the -art analysis. Further, Caltrans structural design methods have been undergoing considerable review and critique since the Loma Prieta Earthquake. As noted by Caltrans, the design method used for the 118/23 Freeway Project has been affirmed by both the Governor's Board of Inquiry and independent peer reviews. The geotechnical report also noted that seismic design of structures be based on the following: Maximum Credible Earthquake Magnitude 7.5 Maximum Ground Acceleration 0.6g For reference, the Loma Prieta Earthquake had a magnitude of 7.1 and a ground acceleration of 0.3g at the I -880. Ground acceleration at this location was magnified two to three times, however, by a soil condition knows as "soft soil ". This soil condition is normally found in coastal areas and does not exist at the 118/23 project site. Staff has also reviewed Map Sheet No. 45 of the California Division of Mines and Geology. This map shows anticipated ground acceleration values to be expected with the occurrence of a Maximum Credible Earthquake. This map indicates an anticipated 0.6g ground acceleration in the freeway project area confirming the design criteria used. RECOMMENDED ACTION Receive and file. Copy: Steve Kueny, City Manager Gary Antonucci, Structural Division JFK:sf 01198/3001 IM0401.COU �w� t MOORPARK ITEM PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. o.P� �•�,4 STEVEN KUENY Mayor ooP °vti City Manager BERNARDO M. PEREZ ,OoRPARK, CAUFORNIA CHERYL J. KANE Mayor Pro Tem G Mee�ng City Attorney SCOTT MONTGOMERY i C of 1991 o PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Councilmember a° Director of JOHN E. WOZNIAK q ON. t °q 9TEO Community Development Councilmember ''y JOHN F. KNIPE LILLIAN KELLERMAN r ` 33 City Engineer City Clerk B JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer TO: The Honorable City Council From: Carolyn Greene Management Analyst DATE: January 16, 1991 SUBJECT: Grant Application for State Curbside Recycling Program City staff has prepared the attached application to the State Department of Conservation for partial funding of the proposed Moorpark curbside recycling program. Grants are awarded annually by the State for projects that increase recycling and litter abatement efforts in communities throughout California. Funding emphasis is on programs that recycle California redemption beverage containers. The City is requesting $12,127 from the State for production and distribution costs of all promotional materials planned for the single - family residential phase of the program. These materials include initial information brochures in English and Spanish, posters for City businesses that will publicize the start of the curbside program, and promotional items. As follow -up publicity, door hangers and a semi - annual newsletter will be produced which will document program successes and inform residents of additional acceptable materials. Newsletters will be sent to all residences and businesses in the City. Grant guidelines indicate successful applicants will demonstrate as much matching support as possible, and this is indicated in the attachment on page 9. Proposals must be received by January 31, 1991, and grant awards will be announced in late April, 1991. Since the City intends to implement a curbside program prior to announcement of the awards, preliminary brochures and related publicity will be prepared using City funds already allocated. If the City is successful in receiving State funding, these funds will be used to reimburse the City for these advance costs and for program expenses incurred after May, 1991. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 The Honorable City Council January 16, 1991 Page 2 Staff Recommendations 1. Adopt Resolution 91 - approving submittal of attached grant to the State Department of Conservation; and 2. Direct the Mayor to sign and forward original documents to Sacramento. 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute all documents related to the receipt of these grant funds. Attachment Resolution No. 91 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR A GRANT FROM THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION FOR RECYCLING ACTIVITIES. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has enacted the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act which provides funds to certain entities for litter abatement and recycling activities; and WHEREAS, the Division of Recycling has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program, setting up necessary procedures governing the submission of proposals by various organizations and local agencies under the program; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the Division of Recycling require the City to certify by resolution local approval to submit a proposal prior to submission of said proposal to the State. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City approves the submission of a proposal for funding under the Division of Recycling's Litter Abatement and Recycling Activities Contract Program. 2. The City fully supports this project. 3. The City certifies that the proposed project does not replace a previously budgeted City project. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. PASSED and ADOPTED this 23rd day of January, 1991. Paul W. Lawrason Jr. Mayor ATTEST: Lillian Kellerman City Clerk CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Division of Recycling 1990 GRANT APPLICATION This form must be fully completed and be received, along with 9 copies, by the Division of Recycling no later than 11:00 a.m. on January 31, 1991 in order to be eligible for consideration. Attachments (answers to questions 1 -5) should not exceed 10 pages. Organization Name City of Moorpark Address 799 Moorpark Avenue City State Zip Moorpark CA 93021 Telephone (805) 529 -6864 Type of Organization (check one) Q City Government (a County Government Local Nonprofit Organization* 'Attach proof of Statewide Nonprofit Organization* nonprofit status Chapter or subsidiary of a National/international Organization* Federal Employer ID number (FEIN) California Contractor ID Number 95-3860962 Is your organization incorporated in California? ❑ Yes (:k No If yes, who are the Corporate Officers? President Vice President Treasurer PROJECT INFORMATION: Project Director Phone # Steven Kuen (805) 529 -6864 Project Manager Phone # Carolyn Greene (805) 529 -6864 Number of Proposed Projects 1 Amount Requested by Project Project Name Amount Requested Public Education and 1 Prmmntinn C moaian $12.127 2 3 Name of State Legislative Representatives Assemblyman Tom McClintock Senator Gary Hart Clearly and briefly answer the following questions. Your answers should be attached to your completed application and must not exceed a total of ten pages. 1 What is the proposed project(s) and how will it be accomplished? Clearly and briefly explain what product(s) will be produced or service(s) will be rendered. Explain how the project will result in the increase of beverage container recycling and what methods will be used to perform the work. 2 What is the need for the proposed project(s)? Discuss why the proposed project(s) is needed and on what research or data you are relying. 3 What is your organization's and/or project team's qualifications to effectively execute the proposed project(s)? Explain how your organization or project team is able to deliver the products or services of the project(s). Previously successful projects may be discussed, or corporate /individual resumes may be included. 4 How will the project continue after the grant money is spent? Explain what provisions have been made to ensure that the project will continue without further funding from the State. 5 What is the implementation schedule of the proposed project(s)? BUDGET BREAKDOWN BY PROJECT: Please complete the following for each proposed project: Project Name: Public Education and Promotion Campaign DOR Additional Funding Source Personnel Services: Salaries and Wages (Attach a detailed explanation of class, salary rate and hours) Benefits (% not to exceed 32% Total Operating Expenses: (Itemize) Equipment Travel Other (Printing, tools, clothing, etc.) Total Construction Items (Itemize) Total Miscellaneous Items (Itemize) Total Project Grand Total $ 16,131 79,541 12,127 12,127 79,541 12,127 $100,194 The following must be completed and signed by an authorized person of the applying organization: I assume responsibility to ensure compliance with all state and local environmental requirements and all appropriate codes, laws, regulations, and guidelines prior to the expenditure of the grant funds. I certify that the funds requested do not replace previously bud- geted funds. I declare that all information submitted for the Division's consid- eration is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further declare that C i tv of Moo roa rk (hereinafter referred to as "prospective grantee ") hereby certifies, unless specifically exempted, compliance with Government Code Section 12990 and California Administrative Code, Title II, Division 4, Chapter 4, in matters relating to the development, implementation and main- tenance of non discrimination program. Prospective grantee agrees not to unlawfully discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, na- tional origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, sex or age (over forty). I, Paul W. Law rason Jr. , hereby swear that I am duly authorized to bind the prospective grantee to the above de- scribed certification. I am fully aware that this certification executed on , in the County of Ventura is made under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California. Name of Authorized Person Paul W. Lawrason Jr, Signature Title Mayor Date PROJECT SUMMARY The City of Moorpark will implement its first curbside recycling program in the spring of 1991. The first phase will include service for all 6,574 single - family residences, with future expansion to multi - family units and businesses. This request is for funds from the State of California Department of Conservation to assist the City of Moorpark in implementing a public education and promotion campaign projects which will consist of the following: initial information brochure - English and Spanish community posters original artwork door hangers recycling newsletters promotional items A total of $12,127 from state funds is requested for this project. Additional funding sources total $100,194. The cost for the entire curbside recycling program is $112,321. SETTING Moorpark is located in southeastern Ventura County and has a population of approximately 25,000. originally a predominately agricultural area, Moorpark has developed into a residential community with strong business and industrial elements. Moorpark was the most recent city in Ventura County to incorporate, becoming a city in 1983. Negotiations to collect franchise fees from residential trash haulers are currently in progress. Increased refuse collection fees are the only source of funds for program implementation. A site and vicinity map is attached. Dating from its origin as an agricultural community, Moorpark has approximately 4,000 (16 %) residents of Hispanic heritage. According to figures supplied by the Moorpark Unified School District, 13% of the district's students have limited English proficiency. District bilingual education specialists point out that in many Hispanic families, children are more proficient in English than their parents, and numerous families are headed by parents who cannot understand English, even if their children can. Thus, successful curbside recycling in Moorpark will depend on informational materials being available in Spanish. Grant Application Page 2 CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Program Design In the residential curbside program, each unit will be provided with one 34- gallon covered wheeled container for commingled recyclables. Haulers will pick up recyclables at curbside on regular rubbish collection days. The proposed program will initially involve collection of all California redemption items, bi -metal cans, glass, newspaper and cardboard, and various types of plastic, including PET, HDPE and LDPE (1, 2 and 4 plastics). City staff are recommending a commingled system rather than one that requires residents to sort their recyclables into several smaller containers. A commingled method, used by several nearby cities, maximizes convenience for residents. Local haulers will separate recyclables from residual rubbish at their processing facility. The City expects to work with the same haulers who are providing curbside programs in adjacent communities. In accordance with the City's first residential refuse franchise agreement, trash haulers will be responsible for purchase, maintenance and replacement of the recycling containers. The City agreed to forego collection of franchise fees from haulers for six months so that sufficient containers could be purchased for the curbside program. Due to Moorpark's relatively small size when compared to neighboring municipalities, the success of similarly designed programs in nearby cities, and a high level of citizen interest, the City will implement curbside recycling city -wide rather than beginning with a pilot program. For example, the City has just concluded its first Christmas tree recycling program, which resulted in the recycling of more than 60% of the community's trees. The program utilized a combination of curbside pick -up and a drop -off location staffed by volunteer groups. Written evaluations of the.tree recycling program from volunteers and from participants have indicated strong support for and interest in the upcoming city -wide curbside recycling. A single- family curbside program will be a significant step in the City's overall approach to recycling, as 85% of the city's residents live in single - family, owner - occupied homes. Educational and Promotional Materials An essential part of the program will be the development of educational and promotional materials. Based on community interest so far, it is anticipated that initial response to curbside Grant Application Page 3 recycling will be strong. However, an aggressive public awareness and education campaign will be needed to maintain interest and support for the program. Funding is needed to cover principal costs for four publications, including artwork, printing and distribution, and for various promotional items. Publications include an initial information brochure in English and in Spanish, community posters, a follow -up door hanger, and two editions of a newsletter. Original artwork will be designed for the door hanger and newsletters, and will emphasize graphics rather than text. This artwork will be used for future City recycling publicity, such as materials promoting multi- family and business recycling, and could be shared with other jurisdictions as needed. All written materials will be printed on textured, recycled paper, in two ink colors, and principles of source reduction (such as duplex printing) applied whenever possible. Promotional items will include pencils, plastic cups, refrigerator magnets, coffee mugs, and tote bags. The City source reduction and recycling logo will be used on all publications and promotional materials. Informational Brochure: Prior to the implementation of residential curbside recycling, the City will prepare and mail 6,574 brochures to each single family household. Brochures in both English and Spanish will be mailed to residences in the City's primarily Hispanic downtown section, and will also be distributed through businesses that serve the Hispanic community. This publication will provide program details, including information on what is recyclable and how to prepare materials for collection. Brochures will be on 8 1/2" X 11" paper with a three panel format. Community Posters: Because Moorpark is a small community, posters placed in local businesses will be an effective method of reaching residents. Posters will provide the program start date, materials to be collected and an information telephone number; 100 posters will be produced. The Chamber of Commerce is supportive of the program and will work with City staff to involve businesses in promotion. Posters will be printed on 11" X 17" recycled paper card stock. Volunteers will assist in the distribution of the posters. Door Hangers: To further reinforce the program, 6,574 door hangers will be produced three months after the program start date. The design will include original artwork and emphasize a graphic presentation of information. This will result in a more attractive publication that will be accessible to residents with limited literacy skills. An English /Spanish version will be produced for the Hispanic community. Door hangers will be distributed at low cost by a local teen work experience club. Grant Application Page 4 Newsletters: Two one -page newsletters will be prepared and mailed to all single and multi - family residences and businesses. The first newsletter will be mailed six months after the program start date, and the second newsletter will be mailed one year after the start date. Approximately 8,100 copies (6,574 for single family units, 1,223 for multi- family units, 300 for businesses) will be needed for each of the two mailings. Newsletters will provide statistics about materials already recycled, advise residents about new items that can be collected and inform the community of future program expansion into multi- family units and businesses. Source reduction and composting issues will also be featured, and other recycling opportunities promoted. Newsletters will be prepared in a one -page format and will utilize original graphics produced for the door hangers. An English /Spanish edition will be produced and mailed to Hispanic community residents and businesses. The teen work experience club will assist with mailing. Promotional Items: Residents will need reminders to change their trash disposal habits and practices. Promotional items designed with the program's new logo will play an important role in prompting residents to continue participation in the curbside program. Pencils and plastic cups will be distributed through schools, businesses, the library, government offices, homeowner associations, community organizations and at Moorpark's major community -wide special event, "Country Days ", held each year in October. Flat 3 11X 5" refrigerator magnets will be mailed to residents with the first newsletter. Mugs and tote bags will be used as prizes for randomly chosen "Recyclers of the Month" in neighborhoods throughout the City in various city -wide contests designed to encourage ongoing participation. Items will be given to the public without charge. Promotional items have been selected for their durability, usefulness and suitability for carrying program publicity. Items made from recycled materials will be used when possible. NEED FOR PROPOSED PROJECT Program goals for Moorpark's curbside recycling program include an increase in the amount and type of materials being recycled in the community, litter reduction, and a net decrease in the volume of waste entering area landfills. Since the City's population is expected to grow approximately 20% by the year 2, 000, all proactive waste reduction programs must be pursued. Moorpark is implementing a residential curbside recycling program for many reasons. The city has one 20/20 Buy Back Center, which is Grant Application Page 5 open only five days a week. It currently accepts only California redemption items. The nearest drop -off center is 7.5 miles from Moorpark, is open limited hours and is closed on Sunday. A local environmental group schedules quarterly community recycling days at City Hall, but widespread awareness of these events is limited. Curbside recycling is also an important component of the City's plan to comply with the California Integrated Solid Waste Management Act (AB 939). The City is currently planning comprehensive waste reduction activities, including residential and business programs for source reduction, recycling and composting. A curbside recycling program is an important first step in raising public awareness of critical waste reduction issues. Moorpark currently utilizes the Simi Valley Landfill for waste disposal. The landfill has recently received a permit for a limited expansion, but will close by the year 2004. No future Ventura County landfill sites have been approved. Simi Valley Landfill tipping fees have increased 250% since 1988 and residential collection fees have risen accordingly. Roadside litter is an ongoing concern in the Moorpark community. There are 9 miles of state highway in the city that are heavily used by commuters and commercial vehicles. Two fast -food restaurants are located on State Highway 118, adjacent to large parcels of vacant land, where quantities of litter collect. A curbside program that accepts all California redemption items and other containers, newspaper and cardboard will help reduce the amount of trash in the city. QUALIFICATIONS OF ORGANIZATION City History The City has participated in solid waste planning efforts in Ventura County. Staff have been members of the County Solid Waste Management Plan and the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan review committees. Elected officials from the three eastern Ventura County cities have established a task force to review common waste management issues as well as to explore various disposal options. Current City Solid Waste Programs City staff are active participants in several County -wide solid waste planning groups. A Moorpark City Council member currently serves as Vice -Chair of the Ventura County Waste Commission, which is the local task force for AB 939. Staff are active in the Waste Commission's technical advisory committee, which is composed of waste professionals from all 10 Ventura County cities. Staff also Grant Application Page 6 participate regularly in the County Recycling Consortium, which meets monthly to discuss and to plan cooperative recycling activities. Staff belong to the Southern California Roundtable, a regional planning group that monitors advancements in market development for recyclables. City Commitment In September, 1990, the City hired its first full -time Solid Waste Program Coordinator whose primary responsibilities include development of waste reduction programs. She is responsible for monitoring preparation of the AB 939 Source Reduction and Recycling Element and implementing diversion goals, and is working actively in the residential, business, industrial and school communities developing awareness of waste reduction issues. The Solid Waste Program Coordinator has 20 years' professional experience in public administration and environmental program organization. Since September, 1990, she has expanded the Civic Center Office Recycling Program, developed a recycling brochure for local businesses, worked with the Moorpark Unified School District on recycling programs for California redemption items, polystyrene, and paper, and presented public programs on recycling to local community organizations. She will oversee the preparation of all educational and promotional materials and will be responsible for implementation of the curbside recycling program. PROGRAM CONTINUATION After completion of this grant, funding of the curbside program, including purchase of replacement containers, expansion into multi- family units and into the business and industrial communities, and ongoing promotional materials will be covered by proceeds from the sale of recyclables, refuse collection fees and other available funding sources. The City will continue promotion of curbside recycling and provide program updates through its own publicity channels, such as the Community Services Newsletter, the local cable television station, radio stations, print media, and by distributing fliers and posters in the community. Grant Application Page 7 January, 1991 Franchise agreements signed with trash haulers City Council approval of curbside • recycling program February, 1991 Preparation of promotional materials /informational brochures in English and Spanish, and posters March, 1991 Mailing of brochures, preparation and distribution of posters, releases to all local media Distribution of containers by haulers March, 1991 Start of curbside recycling program Kick -off publicity events May, 1991 Promotional item distribution begins Development of original artwork for door hangers and newsletters August, 1991 Production and distribution door hangers October, 1991 Production and mailing of first newsletter and refrigerator magnets Preparation of formal program evaluation April, 1992 Production and mailing of second newsletter Preparation of formal program evaluation Grant Application Page 8 PROJECT NAME: City of Moorpark Curbside Recycling Public Education and Promotion Campaign Div. of Additional Recycling Funding Source ($) ($) Personnel Services - Salaries & Wages Solid Waste Program Coordinator (City) 14,131 (40% of total annual salary) overall program and project coordination, design and production of initial program brochure and posters Solid Waste Program Coordinator (City) 4,522 benefits (32% of $14,131) Part -time Clerk (City) 2,000 assist with ongoing information requests, routine phone calls 5 hrs /wk X $8 X 50 wks Operating Expenses - Equipment Curbside recycling containers 72,310 7,231 total (6,574 + 10% for replacement, theft, breakage) @ $10 /ea Container labels 7,231 7,231 10" X 8" scot -cal decals @ $1 /ea w /recycling logo and list of acceptable recyclables rating Expenses Contract Services Graphic design - original artwork and 660 design of door hangers and 2 newsletters, 20 hrs X $33 /hr Translation services 300 translation of written materials to Spanish, 12 hrs X $25 /hr Door hanger distribution 528 community teen work experience club 6 workers X $5.50 /hr X 8 hrs /day X 2 days Grant Application Page 9 Div. of Additional Recycling Funding Source ($) ($) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preparation of mailings for 2 660 newsletters (8,100 each mailing) 6 workers X $5.50 /hr X 10 hrs X 2 Operating Expenses - Materials Printing Information brochure, 645 Eng /Span, 6,574 copies @ $.098 /ea Posters 85 100 @ $.85 /ea Door hangers 540 English /Spanish, 6,574 @ $.082 /ea Newsletters (2 editions) 1,458 English /Spanish, 8,100 copies @ .09 /ea X 2 Postage (estimated bulk rate @ $.15) Information brochure, 6,574 987 Newsletters, 2 editions, 6,700 ea 1,973 Promotional Materials (incl. sales tax & delivery) pencils (3,000) @ $.154 ea 490 plastic cups, 1,000 @ $.89 ea 944 flat 3" X 5" refrigerator magnets 1,776 6,700 @ $.25 /ea coffee mugs 362 180 @ $1.89/ea canvas tote bags 719 200 @ $3.39/ea --------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL: $12,127 $100,194 PROJECT GRAND TOTAL: $112,321 "ZF -h•. IPIA-W January 15, 1991 State of California Dept. of Conservation Division of Recycling,Program Development Branch Grant Program Section 1025 P Street, Roam 325 Sacramento, California 95814 RE: Curbside Recycling Grant Application - City of Moorpark Dear Grants Coordinator: On behalf of the Moorpark Chamber of Commerce, please consider our support of the City of Moorpark's grant application for partial funding of the proposed curbside recycling program. General interest is apparent in the Moorpark business community in source reduction and recycling issues. Several businesses have voluntarily established effective recycling programs. The January issue of "Moorpark Business ", the Chamber's monthly newsletter, contained an article titled "Reduce... Reuse... Recycle" offering businesses information on developing recycling programs. Local merchants have showed their support and willingness to help promote the city's Christmas tree recycling program by displaying window posters. We hope you recognize the community -wide support of the proposed recycling and waste reduction program and will help our city further its efforts by approving their grant application. Sincerely, MOORPARK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Carol Hunt Executive Director CC: Steve Kueny, City Manager Carolyn Greene, Management Analyst 530 MOORPARK AVENUE ♦ MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 ♦ (805) 529 -0322 ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION* MOORPARK BRANCH January 16, 1991 Division of Recycling, Program Development Branch Grant Program Section 1025 P Street, Room 325 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Sir or Madam: The Environmental Coalition, Moorpark Branch, would be strongly supportive of a curbside recycling program in our city. For the past year, our group has initiated a recycling program of our own. Because of our small size, we offer the community the chance to recycle at a single drop off site, once every three months. (We've had 3 events and are ready soon for our 4th). Items we collect are: aluminum cans, cardboard, all glass not 'ust CA redemption), dean tin cans, plastic bottles (CA redemption only), newspaper, and other mixed paper such as magazines. Although we steadily see an increase in participation at each event, we generally know that because of limited time and resources, we aren't getting the kind of response we could with our City's population. Curbside is the answer to better recycling results. People want the convenience to recycle directly from their home. We generally have between 6 and 10 volunteers who will work a 4 -hour schedule. As you can see, our hours are limited, and this is a definite drawback, but we felt we had to do something. When curbside becomes a reality, we may still continue our small - scaled event. This is because, generally speaking, there are still recyclable items not being collected at curbside (i.e., tin cans) that we feel should be. The coalition has already indicated to our City Council our willingness to support and /or help start a program here. We sincerely hope that an effective plan begins here soon. We know what the consequences to our environment will be if we don't! Sincerely, Ma 4on ozn iak Co- Chairni -an � A �_7 6U ohn E. Wozr44k Co- Chairman POST OFFICE BOX 175 • MOORPARK, CA 93020 MOORPARK — _ - - - -_ - - - -_ -^ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTIZICT PAMELA CASTRO Board Member 30 Flory Ave., Moorpark, CA 93021 (805) 529 -1149 January 15, 1991 Division of Recycling, Proa_ram Development Branch Grant Program Section 1025 P Street, Room 325 Sacramento, California 95814 Dear Sir(s); Although our city has experienced tremendous growth within the past six years (from a population of 4,500 to over 24,000) one constant has not changed, and that is the substantial number of Hispanics who make up a vital part of our community. The success of the City of Moorpark's recyclina proqram will Le determined by its organizanization and community wide participation which can only be obtained through effective communication. As a member of the Hispanic community in Moorpark whose family has had a long record (four generations worth) of commitment to community involvement, I feel that it is essential that participation from the Hispanic community be encouraged as well as included. In order to maximize community -wide participation, the City of Moorpark recognizes the importance in providing the translation of informational "materials (such as flyers, and advertisement) into the Spanish language_ I totally support and applaud the efforts of the City of Moorpark in seeking any available fundina /revenue in order that they may accomplish this goal. As an elected school board member of the Moorpark School District, I offer my assistance, in the-_spirit-of cooperative effort, to include school participation in order that the City of Moorpark's proposed curbside recycling proaram be a - community -wide success. S'ncer y, A_'a� Mrs. Pame a Castro Eoard of Education Member PC /pc `0 MOORPARK VICINITY MAP 7 ,tP �Va � qA A q O FWy. :'�ASAAf519 . r% 126\ I MOORPARK 000*0*0000 � SAN �ANDO y y 118 SIMI VALLEY jj 1 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tem SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember C JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember — LILLIAN KELLERMAN By City Clerk MOORPARK CALIFORNIA Meeting M E M O R A N D U M iTEN .I STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Lillian E. Kellerman, City Clerk DATE: January 15, 1991 (CC Meeting of 1/23/91 SUBJECT: AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. - INTERSTATE DIV. VS. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, ET AL; and AT &T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. VS. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION BACKGROUND County Counsel has advised the City that the County of Ventura has been named as a defendant in the above subject actions to recover taxes levied on state assessed property. The City may be affected but the County has not yet been able to confirm the location of the parcel numbers involved. It is anticipated that the attorney general's office will be, in effect, representing a number of counties, including the County of Ventura in these suit. Pursuant to Section 5148, subdivision (b), of the Revenue and Taxation Code, any city receiving notice of the action filed against the State Board of Equalization and the County may, within 30 days of the receipt of notice, intervene in that action. Upon our request, the County will furnish us with copies of the summons and complaint. The total amount of the requested refund from the County (and included cities) in the American Telephone & Telegraph Co. - Interstate Div. vs. State Board of Equalization, et al., action is $1,370.79; the total in the AT &T Communication of California, Inc. vs. State Board of Equalization, et al., action is $25,852.69. RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the report. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 JAMES L. McBRIDE COUNTY COUNSEL MELODIE M. KLEIMAN CHIEF ASSISTANT COUNTY COUNSEL FRANK O. SIEH LITIGATION SUPERVISOR COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 800 SOUTH VICTORIA AVENUE VENTURA, CALIFORNIA 93009 TELEPHONE (805) 654 -2580 FAX NO. (805) 654 2185 January 8, 1991 Lillian Kellerman Moorpark City Clerk 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 Re: AT &T Communications of California, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization, et al.; Sacramento County Superior Court Civil Action No. 517786 Dear Ms. Kellerman: ASSISTANTS Lynne R. Alfasso Joan A. Borger Andrew B. Gustafson Donald 0. Hurley Noel A. Klebaum Lawrence L. Matheney Patricia McCourt William C. Moritz Daniel J. Murphy Dennis L. Slivinski Leroy Smith Jack A. Thompson James W. Thon,s Shannon W Trower Mary C Ward William A. Waters Pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code section 5148, subdi- vision (b), as added by Chapter 1262, Statutes of 1987 (AB 2120), you are hereby advised that the County of Ventura has been named as a defendant in the above - referenced action to recover taxes levied on state assessed property. Your city may be affected, but we have not yet been able to confirm the location of the parcel numbers used by the State Board of Equalization. Please note, however, that the total requested refund from the County of Ventura (and included cities) is $25,852.69. Revenue and Taxation Code section 5148 requires that service of the summons and complaint in this type of property tax refund action be made only upon the State Board of Equalization and that the Board in turn notify counties who will notify cities of the pending action. A representative of the Board of Equalization was served personally with a summons and complaint in this matter on Decem- ber 24, 1990. An extension of the time to respond has been granted to February 15, 1991. We anticipate that the attorney general's office will be, in effect, representing a number of counties, including the County of Ventura. Please note that pursuant to section 5148, subdivision (b), any city receiving notice of the action filed against the board and the county may, within 30 days of the receipt of this notice, intervene in that action. Upon your request, we will furnish you with copies of the summons and complaint. Please acknowledge receipt of this letter by dating and signing the enclosed copy thereof and returning it to us in the enclosed self - addressed stamped envelope. Very truly yours, LkENCE L. MATHENE Assistant County.Cqunsel LLM :jh Enclosure Receipt is hereby acknowledged: CITY OF MOORPARK Lillian Kellerman, City Clerk Date: _4z��7 - JAMES L. McBRIDE COUNTY COUNSEL MELODIE M. KLEIMAN CHIEF ASSISTANT FRANK O. SIEH LITIGAT10% SJPER'JISGR COUNTY COUNSEL COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTEH ADMINISTFATION BUILDING 300 SOUTH VICTORIA AVENUE VENTURA_ CALIFORNIA 95(109 TELEPHONE 18051 66- 1- 2')8,) January 8, 1991 Lillian Kellerman Moorpark City Clerk 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 ASSTS' -',%1 Re: American Telephone and Telegraph Co. - Interstate Division v. State Board of Equalization, et al.; Sacramento County Superior Court Civil Action No. 517785 Dear Ms. Kellerman: Jca^ a C Dan e, r n, D nr,s ns< Le,o,. S- JACK , .lames '�1, - s Shannon T•c.•.er P.lar� C ''.`.ara ',V,uarn A Pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code section 5148, subdi- vision (b), as added by Chapter 1262, Statutes of 1987 (AB 2120), you are hereby advised that the County of Ventura has been named as a defendant in the above - referenced action to recover taxes levied on state assessed property. Your city may be affected, but we have not yet been able to confirm the location of the parcel numbers used by the State Board of Equalization. Please note, however, that the total requested refund from the County of Ventura (and included cities) is $1,370.79. Revenue and Taxation Code section 5148 requires that service of the summons and complaint in this type of proper "y tax refund action be made only upon the State Board of Equalization and that the Board in turn notify counties who will notify cities of the pending action. A representative of the Board of Equalization was served personally with a summons and complaint in this matter on Decem- ber 24, 1990. An extension of the time to respond has been granted to February 15, 1991. We anticipate that the attorney general's office will be, in effect, representing a number of counties, including the County of Ventura. Please note that pursuant to section 5148, subdivision (b), any city receiving notice of the action filed against the board and the county may, within 30 days of the receipt of this notice, intervene in that action. Upon your request, we wi11 furnish you with copies of the summons and complaint. -- ? f:C"w cD - -Nity of Map, Please acknowledge receipt of this letter by dating and signing the enclosed copy thereof and returning it to us in the enclosed self - addressed stamped envelope. Very truly yours, LA RENCE L. MATHEIUEY Assistant County ounsel LLM:jh Enclosure Receipt is hereby acknowledged: CITY OF MOORPARK Lillian Kellerman, City Clerk Date: S� V 2 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M.PEREZ Mayor Pro Tem SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MEMORANDUM To: The Honorable City Council From: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Developmen Date: January 16, 1991 (City Council Meeting 1- 23 -91) Subject: CONTRACT PLANNING SERVICE BACKGROUND ITEM 8•S STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYLJ.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer MOORPARK. CAUFORNIA City M"" of _ 199. ACTION: I !^-J The Department of Community Development accepted an application (IPD 90 -15) from Litton Industries regarding the processing of a proposed 176,000 square foot industrial facility at the corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Condor Drive South. This project is within the Moorpark Business Center for a single user who needs to take occupancy by years end. City staff and representatives from Litton Industries have met and agreed upon a schedule which will accomplish the required processing. However, at the present time Community Development personnel has one authorized Planning position vacant and is committed to a variety of other filed projects and demands. Therefore, there is a need for contractual Planning Services. Litton Industries has agreed to pay for all costs for depositing funds to cover the use of contract planning. Also, this process will help facilitate the desired schedule. Staff was able to obtain the firm of Impact Sciences Inc. to perform this work within the desired schedule. Impact Sciences Inc. has worked for the City in the past; most recently on the Mission Bell Plaza project. The City's standard contract will be used and the attached January 14, 1991 letter from Impact Sciences and the two attachments to the letter will be incorporated into this contract. RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve the use of Impact Sciences Inc. as case planner for the proposed 176,000 square foot industrial complex within the Moorpark Business Center so long as Litton Industries pays all costs associated with this contractor not to exceed $19,685.00 without further approval by the applicant and City Manager. Authorize the Manager to approve any increase in the contract up to a total of $25,000.00. 2. Approve the contract with Impact Sciences Inc. regarding IPD 90 -15 and authorize the Mayor to sign. Attachments: Exhibit A - Agreement For Case Planning Services Exhibit B - Impact Sciences Inc. Letter Dated Janury 14, 1991 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, Califomia 93021 (805) 529 -6864 EXHIBIT_ AGREEMENT FOR CASE PLANNING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day by and between the City of Moorpark, a municipal corporation located in the County of Ventura, State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Impact Sciences, Inc., a California Corporation, hereinafter referred as "ISI". W I T N E S S E T H Whereas, City has the need for the preparation of case planning services, Whereas, City desires to contract for such services with a private consultant in anticipation that said private consultant can provide such services in a manner acceptable to the City; and Whereas, ISI is experienced in providing such services for municipal corporations and is able to provide personnel with the proper experience, certifications and background to carry out the duties involved; and Whereas, City wished to retain ISI for the performance of said services; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual convents, benefits and premises herein stated, the parties hereto agree as follows: City does hereby appoint ISI in a contractual capacity to perform the services in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth in Attachment 'A'; with the authorities, and responsibilities ordinarily granted to this type of consultant work. I. COMPENSATION TO ISI The fees in full compensation to ISI for the services rendered shall be as set forth in Attachment 'B' II. TERMINATION This agreement may be terminated with or without cause by City or ISI at any time with no less than 30 days written notice of such termination. In the event of such termination, ISI shall be compensated for such services up to the date of termination. Such compensation for work in progress shall be pro -rated as to the percentage of progress completed at the date of termination. III. GENERAL CONDITIONS A. City shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salary, wage or earlier compensation to any person employed by ISI performing services hereunder for City. B. ISI is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City or any of its officers, employees, servants or agents shall control over the conduct of ISI or any of ISI's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. ISI shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner employees of the City. C. At the time of 1)termination of this agreement or 2) conclusion of all work; all original documents, designs, drawings, reports, logos, diskettes, computer files, notes and other related materials whether prepared by ISI or obtained in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this ISI agreement shall become the sole property of the City. qt -c),( D. ISI shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend the City and its officers, employees, servants and agents serving as Independent contractors in the role of City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Director of Community Development or City Attorney from any claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense, for any damage whatsoever, including but not limited to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, resulting from misconduct, negligent acts, errors or omissions of ISI or any of its officers, employees or agents in the performance of this agreement. The City does not and shall not, waive any rights that it may have against ISI by reason of Paragraph E hereof, because of the acceptance by the City, or the deposit with the City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this agreement. This holds harmless and indemnification provision shall apply regardless of whether or not said insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense described in Paragraph E hereof. E. ISI shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for, and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this agreement that policies of insurance on or before the commencement of the term of this agreement. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in, any of said policies or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the protection offered by the policies shall: 1. Name the City and its officers, employees, servants and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Director of Community Development or City Attorney, as additional insured with ISI. 2. Insure the City and its officers and employees, while acting in the scope of their duties under this agreement against all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses costs or expenses arising from, or in any way connected with the performance of this agreement by ISI. 3. Bear an endorsement or have attached a rider whereby it is provided that, in the event of cancellation or amendment of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by mail, postage prepaid, not less than thirty (30) days before the cancellation or amendment is effective. ISI shall give City thirty (30) days written notice prior to the expiration of such policy. 4. Be written on an occurrence Basis. Consistent with the provisions of Paragraph E, ISI shall provide general public liability including automobile liability and property damage insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and annual aggregate. G. Consistent with the provisions of Paragraph E, ISI shall provide worker's compensation insurance as required by the California Labor Code. If any class of employees engaged by ISI in work under this agreement is not protected by the workers' compensation law, ISI shall provide adequate insurance for the protection of such employees to the satisfaction of the City. H. ISI shall not assign this agreement, or any of the rights, duties or obligations hereunder. It is understood and acknowledged by the parties that ISI is uniquely qualified to perform these services provided for in this agreement. I. ISI's proposal is hereby incorporated into this agreement as "Exhibit A ". J. Payment to ISI shall be made by City within 30 days of receipt of invoice, except for those which are contested or questioned and returned by City, with written explanation within 15 days of receipt of invoice. ISI shall provide to City a written response to any invoice contested or questioned and further, upon request of City, provide City with any and all documents related to any invoice. K. Any notice to be given pursuant to this agreement shall be in writing, and all such notices and any other document to be delivered shall be delivered by personal service or by deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, and addressed to the party for whom intended as follows: To: City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Attn: City Manager To: Impact Sciences, Inc. 267 W. Hillcrest Drive, 1st Floor Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Either party may, from time to time, by written notice to the other, designate a different address which shall be substituted for the one above specified. Notices, payments and other documents shall be deemed delivered upon receipt by personal service or upon deposit in the United States mail. L. Nothing contained in this agreement shall be deemed, construed or represented by the City or ISI by any third person to create the relationship of principal or agent, or of a partnership, or of a joint venture, or of any other association of any kind or nature between the City and ISI. M. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties concerning the subject matter hereof and all prior agreements or understandings, oral or written, are hereby merged herein. This agreement shall not be amended in any way except by a writing expressly purporting to be such an amendment, signed and acknowledged by both of the parties hereto. N. Should interpretation of this agreement, or any portion thereof, be necessary, it is deemed that this agreement was prepared by the parties jointly and equally, and shall not be interpreted against either party on the ground that the party prepared the agreement or caused it to be prepared. 0. No waiver of any provision of this agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether of not similar, nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision. No waiver shall be binding, unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. P. In the event any action, suit or proceeding is brought for the enforcement of, or the declaration of any right or obligation pursuant to this agreement or as a result of any alleged breach of any provision of this agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, from the losing party, and any judgement or decree rendered in such a proceeding shall include an award thereof. Q. Cases involving a dispute between the City and ISI may be decided by an arbitrator if both sides agree in writing, with costs proportional to the judgement of the arbitrator. R. This agreement is made, entered into, executed in Ventura County, California, and any action filed in any court of for arbitration for the interpretation, enforcement or other action of the terms, conditions or covenants referred to herein shall be filed in the applicable court in Ventura County, California. S. The captions and headings of the various Articles and Paragraphs of this agreement are for convenience and identification only and shall not be deemed to limit or define the content of the respective Articles and Paragraphs hereof. IV. RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL The individual directly responsible for ISI overall performance of the contract provisions herein above set forth and to serve as principal liaison between ISI and City shall be Eric Sakowic2, President. Upon mutual written agreement of the parties, other individuals may be substituted in the above capacities as responsible individuals. V. IMPLEMENTATION The City shall provide ISI with written notice in advance of the date at which these services are to be implemented if different than the date of the agreement. OFFERED BY: �I$PAt"1rSC NC , INC. C Tom Worthington k Date ACCEPTED BY: CITY OF MOORPARK Mayor Date ATTACHMENT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES To fulfill the City's requirements for processing this proposal, Impact Sciences, Inc. will assume the role of environmental consultant and case planner on the project. Responsibilties of Impact Sciences, Inc. will be as follows: 1) To act as a direct link between Litton Industries and the City of Moorpark Community Development Department. Impact Sciences, Inc. will actively participate as environmental consultant and case planner for the City of Moorpark on this project. Records of all dialog between Impact Sciences and Inc. Litton Industries with respect to application materials, scheduling of meetings and hearings, noticing, staff report format, use of City facilities and materials will be properly kept and transmitted directly to the Community Development Department. It is understood that the Community Development Director will act as the final decision maker. The contact person at Litton Industries is Kristin Liu. 2) The preparation of an Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Plan. Based on conversations with the City of Moorpark, it is assumed an annotated Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration will be prepared. These items will be prepared based on, and in accordance with, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), reflecting the CEQA's most current guidelines. The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration will include discussion of impacts and mitigation measures (where appropriate) for geology, biology, cultural resources, visual /aesthetic resources, traffic, air quality, noise, risk of upset and public services. For completeness, and in accordance with the most recent CEQA revisions, this information will be discussed textually in the report and supplemented with graphic illustrations, as appropriate. As part of this analysis, an assessment of the parcel map, site plan and building elevations will also be conducted. Specific recommendations will be forwarded to the City and Litton Industries for possible incorporation into project plans. Impact Sciences, Inc. will coordinate any change in the project description that may occur as a result of these planning recommendations. 3) Staff Report and Planning Commission and City Council Resolution preparation. Impact Sciences, Inc. will prepare staff reports for the IPD and parcel map and will thoroughly address appropriate City zoning codes and General Plan requirements, major and minor environmental and planning issues, site plan review, conflict resolution and conditions of approval. Educational "white papers" will be supplied to the Planning Commission and City Council, as appropriate. Formal Resolutions will be prepared and form the basis of the agreement between the applicant and City. Staff reports and resolutions will be formatted according to current procedures established by the City of Moorpark Community Development Department. �r.t�:� +.,!Lf 4) Preparation of Conditions of Approval. As a vital section of the staff reports, conditions of approval will also be prepared for the IPD and parcel map. It is assumed that the City Engineer, Community Development Director and other applicable City department representatives will assist in the preparation of this material. 5) Attendance and presentation at all required Planning Commission and City Council meetings. Impact Sciences, Inc. will be present at all required meetings to support City staff concerns. Impact Sciences, Inc. will be responsible for the preparation of all overhead projection graphics and all other descriptive material necessary for these hearings. 6) All public notification for public hearings and environmental documents. Impact Sciences, Inc. will prepare and ensure that all public notices and environmental documents are duplicated and distributed on time and in accordance with proper procedure, as identified in the California Environmental Quality Act and its implementing guidelines as well as State Planning and Zoning laws and City procedures. 7) Condition compliance monitoring during the zone clearance process. Given City Council approval of the IPD and parcel map, Impact Sciences, Inc. will implement enforcement of the mitigation monitoring plan and condition compliance review of all submitted final plans and documents, prior to issuance of zone clearance. WORK SCHEDULE - (1 14/91 to 1/18/91) A complete application for the IPD and parcel map will be obtained two weeks from the time the City of Moorpark authorizes work to proceed. If a parcel map is filed concurrently at this time, completeness of the application may be delayed. - (1/21/91 to 2118/91) A draft Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be prepared for City review within two (2) weeks (10 working days) of the date of completeness of the application. The draft will then be circulated to City departments for review and comment for a one (1) week period. Within one (1) week of receiving all comments, a revised document will be created which incorporates comments, as appropriate. - (2/19/91 to 3/21/91) The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be printed and circulated for public review with proper notification filed. The public review period is 30 days, since the document will be filed with the State Clearinghouse (Caltrans is an affected agency). Comments on the draft document will be reviewed and incorporated as appropriate into the final Nitigated Negative Declaration presented to the Planning Commission and City Council. If substantial changes to the document occur, the document may have to be recirculated for an additional 30 day public: review period. During this time the staff reports, findings, resolutions and other support documents will be prepared and reviewed by City staff. (3/11/91 to 4/15/91) Impact Sciences, Inc. staff will attend a total of 4 public hearings with the Planning Commission and City Council. Planning Commission public hearing(s) are presumed to begin prior to the end of the 30 day public review period mentioned above. Additional meetings will be charged separately on a time and expense basis. Five weeks is anticipated to accomplish this task. - (Post Approval Monitoring) Impact Sciences, Inc. will continue to act as case planner to review condition compliance when the final plans are submitted for plan check, prior to zone clearance. The schedule for this work task is not known at this time. ATTACHMENT "B" COST ESTIMATE FOR "LITTON INDUSTRIES" PROJECT 1. Complete Application for IPD and Parcel Map Document Review, Review City Project Application Procedure, Complete Application, Client Coordination DeNiro 65.00 30.00 1,950.00 2. Initial Study and Prepare Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Monitoring Plan Compile Environmental Information by Section and Prepare MND and Monitoring Plan DeNiro 65.00 50.00 3,250.00 Circulation to City Staff and Response to City Staff Comments DeNiro 65.00 20.00 1,300.00 3. Circulation and Public Review of MND and Monitoring Plan Public Notification DeNiro 65.00 5.00 325.00 Document Circulation DeNiro 65.00 6.00 390.00 Reproduction Staff 50.00 8.00 400.00 4. Staff Reports Staff Reports and Conditions of Approval (IPD and parcel map), Resolutions DeNiro 65.00 40.00 2,600.00 TASK STAFF Rate/Hr HOURS COST 5. Public Hearings Four meetings Sakowicz /DeNiro 100.00 12.00 1,200.00 6. Condition Compliance Plan Check prior to Zone Clearance, Mitigation Monitoring Compliance 7. Project Management and Expenses Project Management Graphics Materials Reproduction Costs (70 report copies, (35 draft, 35 final: 50 pages each @ $.10 /page) Contingency DeNiro 65.00 60.00 3,900.00 Sakowicz 150.00 16.00 2,400.00 Richkind 55.00 8.00 440.00 200.00 — 200.00 350.00 1.000.00 TOTAL $19,685.00 IMPACT SCIENCES INC 267 Vest Hillcrest Drive a First Floor Thousand Oaks, California 91360 Telephone (806) 494 -6600 a FAX (806) 494 -6631 January 14, 1991 City of Moorpark Community Development Department 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 Attention: Mr. Patrick J. Richards Re: Proposal for Environmental and Planning Services "Litton Industries" Project No. IPD 90-15 and Parcel Map, City of Moorpark Dear Mr. Richards, Impact Sciences, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal for professional services for the above referenced project. The content of this proposal is based on our conversation with you on Monday, December 17, 1990, and our previous experience preparing similar environmental documents, staff reports and related materials for development projects in the City of Moorpark. As you are well aware, the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Mission Bell Plaza shopping center on Los Angeles Avenue (CPD 89 -1 and 2 and LDM 89 -2), the mitigation monitoring plan, staff reports, findings and conditions of approval were recently completed by our firm for the City. Impact Sciences, Inc. understands that for this project the City of Moorpark is requesting our assistance in the preparation of the required environmental documentation (i.e., the annotated Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration) as well as the preparation of the staff report(s), findings, mitigation monitoring plan and conditions of approval. Additional tasks include presentation of this project before the City's Planning Commission and City Council, the preparation of educational "white papers ", as needed, and monitoring the implementation of the required mitigation measures and conditions of approval, prior to zone clearance. We understand this project would operate as a coordinated effort between Impact Sciences, Inc., the City of Moorpark and Litton Industries. As proposed, the project includes the construction of an approximately 176,000 square foot office /industrial building within an existing light industrial subdivision (Tract No. 3492). Litton Industries would occupy the new structure as well as an existing adjacent building (144,000 square feet), which would be vacated by Litton Aero Products Division. Several levels of parking will be constructed underground. Height of the new structure will be maximum of 60 feet and at full occupancy, the structures will be occupied by approximately 1,670 emplovees. Entitlements must be obtained from the City by the applicant and include: (1) an Industrial - Planned Development (IPD) Permit and; (2) a Parcel tilap. Our proposed work scope and projected schedule proposed for this project is found in Attachment "A" of this later. Some overlap of tasks will most likely occur. However, based on our conversations, it is assumed that work will be initiated via an interim verbal authorization to proceed and begin on Monday, January 7, 1991. Impact Sciences, Inc. will provide the services listed in Attachment "A" for a not -to- exceed budget of $19,685.00. A breakdown of the costs associated with each work task associated with this project is available upon request. The time and fees provided in this proposal are valid for a period of 45 days, beginning with the date of authorization to proceed. Impact Sciences, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to be considered for this project, and looks forward to being of service to your City. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please call. Tim DeNiro Environmental Specialist II PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M.PEREZ Mayor Pro Tern SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MOORPARK M E M O R A N D U M The Honorable City Council Lillian E. Kellerman, City Clerk January 17, 1991 ITEM-8-K-6 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer USE OF COMMUNITY CENTER BY COUNTY ELECTIONS FOR ELECTIONS OFFICIALS TRAINING CLASS BACKGROUND In connection with the March 5, 1991 Special Municipal Election, Ventura County Elections has requested use of the Community Center for a training class for election officials. The class is proposed to be held on March 4, 1991 from 1:00 to 3:00 p.m. A maximum of 30 persons will attend the training class. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Waive fees and authorize use of the Citrus Room for the Election Officials Training Class on March 4, 1991 from 1:00 to 3:00 p.m. :ORPARK, CALIFORNIA City Co I Meeting of 199 ACTION:" I gy lic- -' 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M.PEREZ Mayor Pro Tern SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MOORPARK iTEM.R_ L. STEVEN KUENY City Manager CORPARK, CAUFORNIA CHERYL J. KANE City C II M6eting City Attorney of 11401ICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of ACTIO munity Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer N V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer M E M O R A N D U M TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Lillian E. Kellerman, City Clerk -`f DATE: January 17, 1991 r/ SUBJECT: RECYCLING EVENT - ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION BACKGROUND The City Council has previously authorized the use of the Community Center parking lot by the Environmental Coalition for recycling collection events. Events were held in April, July and October in 1990. This year, the Environmental Coalition plan to have at least three recycling collection days, one every four months. The first collection date is planned for January 26, from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. and the Coalition has again requested the use of the Community Center parking lot for _the event. The requested date does not conflict with any previously scheduled event. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve the request by the Coalition to use the Community Center Parking lot for their recycling event on January 26 from 10 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve additional dates for the Coalition recycling event to be held later in the year. 3. Waive fees for the three events as requested. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION* MOORPARK BRANCH January 14, 1991 Steve Kueny 799 Moorpark Aveue Moorpark, CA 93021 Dear Mr. Kueny, The Moorpark Branch of the Environmental Coalition would like to thank you for your past support of our recycling efforts last year. The community's participation has expanded with each successive drive. This year .ue plan to have at least three more collection days, once every four months as we did last year. We are planning our first recycling collection date for January 26, from 10 a.m. - 3 p.m. Please let us know if we can again use the Community Center parting lot at this time. It has worked out very well in the past. We are also looking forward to the city starting its own recycling program. You have our total support for a curbside recycling program in 'Ioorpark. Please let us know as soon as possible if we can use the Community Center parking lot on Jan. 26, from 10 a.m. - 3 p.m. Thank you again for you continued support and prompt attention of our new request. Sincerely, 4 Sharon Harper Corresponding Secretary ff,E MEN U E�D JAN 15 1991 CITY OF MOORPARK OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER POST 0 FFICE BOX 175 . MOORPARK, CA 93020 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tern SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MOORPARK .-IORPARK, CAUFMN A City Cotes Meeting ot_ / -4 I, M E M O R A N D U M ITEM8--l-CL• STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Donald P. Reynolds, Jr., Management Analyst DATE: January 16, 1991 SUBJECT: Status of Redevelopment Agency Fiscal Matters and Proposed Loan The following report will summarize the City Council, the fiscal status of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency, (RDA). A proposed budget for fiscal year 1990/91 is presented in Attachment "B ", based on staff's projection of RDA needs for the this fiscal year. Staff is recommending a loan and transfer of $50,000 from the City's General Fund Reserve. Background On August 26, 1987, the City made its first loan to RDA in the amount of $55,000. A second loan was approved in fiscal year 1988/89 in the amount of $13,000. On October 18, 1989, the Redevelopment Agency approved a loan from the City in the amount of $70,000 under the terms and conditions that interest would be applied to this loan, and that RDA would repay all City loans by June 30, 1994. On January 10, 1990, an additional loan of $15,000 was approved. On January 18, 1989, the Agency adopted a budget for fiscal year 1989/90 with projected expenditures totalling $54,536. These funds were appropriated primarily for special legal services, with an allowance of $2,500 for consultant work and $2,000 for design services, ( in the event that the legal matters were resolved, and project implementation could be initiated). June 15, 1990, report to Council authorized $30,000 to be loaned from the City's General Fund Reserve to the Redevelopment Agency for special legal services, Attachment "A ", increasing the 1989/90 budget to $84,536. The total 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 amount of funds loaned from the City to the Agency, since 1987, is $183,000. This loan provided sufficient funding for the remainder of fiscal year 1989/90 expenditures. Discussion Attachment "B" presents staff's proposed budget for 1990/91. The funds appropriated last year for the initiation of Agency projects has been reappropriated for this fiscal year. An estimation of funds needed at this time to account for additional RDA special legal services is presented as $50,000. On January 3, 1991, the RDA received its first tax increment payment from the County of Ventura in the amount of $250,993.22. Due to the ongoing litigation involving RDA, these funds have been placed into a restricted reserve account until these matters are resolved. The total proposed budget for the Agency is $54,500, and the total proposed loan from the City to the Agency would be increased to $233,000. As stipulated under the terms and conditions referenced in the October 18, 1989, staff report, the total amount of principal plus interest would be repaid by RDA by June 30, 1994. The interest would be compounded monthly on the unpaid balance based on the current Local Agency Investment Fund rate. In the event that the proposed loan of $50,000 is not sufficient for Agency legal expenses, staff would return to the Council with the status of these costs for consideration of an additional loan. Recommendation to The Honorable City Council: Staff recommends that the City Council loan $50,000 from the General Fund Reserve to the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency. Attachments: A) June 15, 1990 Staff Report B) Proposed Redevelopment Agency Budget for Fiscal Year 1990/91 BERNARDO M.PEREZ Mayor SCOTT MONTGOMERY Mayor Pro Tern ELOISE BROWN Councilmember CLINT HARPER, Ph.D. Councilmember PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr. Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Attachment A MOORPARK ITEM S• STEVEN KUENY a P ° i -�ORPARK, CAUFORNIA City Manager a - City Coundl Meeting CHERYL J. KANE a o f 199 City Attorney i o RICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. /* ACTION: Director of oq �" �'Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer By JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer M E M O R A N D U M The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Donald P. Reynolds, Jr., Management Analyst June 15, 1990 Status of Redevelopment Agency Fiscal Matters for 1989/90 Budget Recommendations The following report summarizes the fiscal status of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency, (RDA). A proposed revised budget for fiscal year 1989/90 is presented in Attachment "B", based on staff's projection of RDA needs for the remainder of this fiscal year. Staff is recommending a loan and transfer of $30,000 from the City's General Fund Reserve to be appropriated for special legal services. Discussion January 10, 1990, report to Council authorized $15,000 to be transferred from the City's General Fund Reserve to the Redevelopment Agency for special legal services. This report also allowed staff to return to the Agency and request additional funds for special legal services in the event that the cost of these services exceed the current appropriation. The loan authorized January 10, 1990, of $15,000, increased the total RDA appropriation to $54,536 for fiscal year 1989/90. With the additional $30,000 loan there would be a total appropriation of $84,536 this fiscal year. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr. Mayor SCOTT MONTGOMERY Mayor Pro Tem ELOISE BROWN Councilmember CLINT HARPER, Ph.D. Councitmernber BERNARDO M.PEREZ Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk ft ATTACHMENT A_ MOORPA�&,-tv M E M O R A N D U M *t STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Diredor of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer TO- The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency FROM. Donald P yn . Reynolds, Jr., Management Analyst DATE: January 10, 1990 SUBJECT: Statusof Budget Recommendations Fiscal Matters for 1989/9 0 The following report summarizes the fiscal status of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency, (RDA). A draft budget for fiscal year 1989 /90=is presented based on staff's projection of RDA needs for-the - remainder of this fiscal ` year. Staff=_, does not anticipate that the Agency will have much of an opportunity to expand beyond resolution of the.: current litigations. Therefore,---staff is recommending:.a loan and transfer of $15,000 from the City's General _Fund Reserve to be appropriated primarily for special legal services. Background The October 16, 1989 report to the Council authorized $70,000 to be from the Casyfollowsra$30 000 for Reserve to the Redevelop ment y 1988/89 expenses, and $40,000 for 1989/90 expenses. The total City transfers thus far to RDA is $138,000, (Attachment A). The Agency's total expenditures up to July 1, 1989 are $98,928, leaving $39,536, for fiscal year 1989/90. With the additional $15,000 loan there would be a total appropriation for fiscal year 1989/ 0 of A financial statement has been prepared which illustrates Agency fiscal matters since 19137 and proposed \ sed appropriations p Through December,. for 1989/90 fiscal-year,. (Attachment B). . 1989/90 expenses relate solely to speci(lorl$291976r1esssthe $24,560, leaving a balance of $1.4,976, i (805) 529 -6864 Moorpark, Califomia 93021 RDA Budget June 15, 1990 Page 2 Recommendation That the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency: 1) Approve a transfer from the City General Fund Reserve in the amount of $30,000 in order to fund required legal services for fiscal year 1989/90, to be added to the previously modified fund balance of $54,536, for a total of $84,536; 2) Adopt the revised budget as presented in Attachment B, for fiscal year 1989/90; Attachments: A) January 10, 1990 Staff Report B) Proposed Revised Redevelopment Agency Budget g Fl. proposed interfund loan), shown as "Current Status" Attachment B. in Discussion The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency will need to appropriate funding for fiscal year 1989/90 for the cost of special legal services and related services by the redevelopment consultant, and possibly for the initiation of projects. Staff feels that these costs should be appropriated as needed in order to keep the Agency debt to a minimum. Therefore, staff is recommending that $15,000 be transferred from the City General Fund Reserve utilizing $12,500 for legal costs, (10,000 for special legal services and $2,500 in case the consultant is required to assist in the City's defense), leaving $2,500 for professional services unrelated to the current litigations. The proposed 1989/90 budget is presented for the Agency's consideration and adoption, Attachment C. Recommendation That the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency: 1) Approve a transfer from the City General Fund Reserve in the amount of $15,000 in order:to fund required legal services and project initiation for fiscal year 1989/90,--to be added.to- the:.beginning fund balance of- $39,536, fora total - . of $54,536. appropriation 2) Adopt the •: : _, - -_ _ - -..__. :,��, .._ _,,.� ,:..: pro p osed budget as presented in Attachment C, for fiscal year- 1989/90;,,--- _ 3 ) Allow staff to return to the - additional funds to be transferred-.as need dein the event that the cost of special-legal services exceeds the current appropriations. Attachments: A) Staff Report to Council, October 16, 1989 B) Redevelopment Agency Financial Statement C) Proposed Redevelopment Agency Budget for Fiscal Year;1989 /90 " e� PROPOSED REVISED REDEVELOPMENT BUDGET REVENUE BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 54,536 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND RESERVE 30,000 TOTAL REVENUES 84,536 AGENCY APPROPRIATIONS SPECIAL LEGAL SERVICES 79,536 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,500 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 5,000 TOTAL 84,536 ce Fiscal Year 1988/89, including the proposed transfer of $30,000, is $183,000 ATTACHMENT B PROPOSED MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 REVENUE Actual Budget 1989/90 1990/91 Beginning Fund Balance (464) 4,500 Tax Increment 0 250,993 Loan from General Funds Reserve 85.000 50,000 Total Revenues 84,536 305,493 AGENCY APPROPRIATIONS Budget Actual Budget 1989190 1989/90 1990/91 Special Legal Services 79,500 79,500 50,000 Contractual Services 2,500 0 2,500 Engineering and Design 2,000 0 2,000 Total Expenditures 85,000 79,500 54,500 Reserve Fund Balance 250,993 Total Liabilities 305,493 Fund Balances - Unreserved 4,500 0 * The total City loan to the Redevelopment Agency from FY 1987/88 to FY 1989/90, equals $183,000. Adding proposed FY 1990/91 loan of $50,000 equals a total City loan of $233,000. PAUL W. LAWRASON JR Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tem SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MOORPARK "AURA �i P.'aeling MEMORANDUM To: The Honorable City Council From: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development Date: January 17, 1991 (City Council Meeting 1- 23 -91) Subject: RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION VAWATION Background 1 E ,b STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer When the City established its own Building and Safety program it continued the County's practice of assuming that the cost of residential construction was approximately $45.00 per square foot. It has become apparent that $45.00 per square foot is an unrealistically low estimate of the value of residential construction that is typical of this area. Every jurisdiction in Ventura County, including the County itself, has adjusted their estimate of construction cost to be consistent with nationally published construction data. Other jurisdictions, value high quality residential construction at about $70.00 per square foot. The result of this discrepancy is that building permit fees for residential construction in the City of Moorpark are significantly lower than neighboring jurisdictions. (See Attachment 11). Discussion Proposed is the intent to have the Building Official assign valuations for single family residential dwellings based upon national construction cost data as published by the International Conference of Building Officials. This would allow the Building Official to use the most recently published data. According to the current March /April 1991 Building Standards Index the value for high quality residential construction is $71.80. Therefore, the City's rate would change from it's current rate of $45.00 per square foot to the $71.80 figure. With the use of the national construction cost data, as produced by I.C.B.O. every two months, small increments periodically may occur with Council's approval over time and avoid substantial increases in the future. Government Code Section 54992(a) requires that prior to approving an increase in an existing fee or service charge, the City must hold at least one public meeting. This section of the Government Code also requires that information be made available to interested parties. It is staff's intention to request the Council to set February 6, 1990 as the Public hearing regarding this matter. Staff will also send notice to the Building Industry Association, cbamber of Commerce and those residential developers with tracts currently approved. Staff Recommendation That the City Council set February 6, 1991 as a Public hearing date to consider an increase in determining the value of single family residential construction as it relates to building permit fees. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 CnT sTM VIWITIONS, STRUC U Pug CS&CK !ONUS Moorpark 11102 Broadway $ 187,000 $ 864.00 $ 561.60 $ 1,425.60 Simi 280,000 1,170.00 761.09 1,931.99 Thousand Oaks 251,066 1,075.20 698.88 1,774.08 County 257,680 1,095.00 711.76 1,806.76 Moorpark 4165 Kingsview $ 190,260 $ 873.90 $ 568.03 $ 1,441.93 Simi 291,140 1,204.20 782.53 1,986.73 Thousand Oaks 260,294 1,104.90 718.19 1,823.09 County 267,860 1,128.00 733.20 1,201.20 Moorpark 4189 Kingsview $ 200,212 $ 906.90 $ 589.49 $ 1,496.39 Simi 307,254 1,260.00 819.00 2,079.00 Thousand Oaks 274,523 1,151.00 748.21 1,899.21 County 282,552 1,177.50 765.37 1,942.87 Moorpark 11175 Broadway $ 132,692.00 $ 682.50 $ 443.63 $ 1,126.13 Simi 202,086 913.50 593.77 1,507.27 Thousand Oaks 180,867 840.90 546.59 1,387.49 County 186,072 860.70 519.85 1,380.55 Moorpark 4188 Kingsview $ 186,944 $ 860.70 $ 559.45 $ 1,420.15 Simi 286,186 1,187.40 771.82 1,959.22 Thousand Oaks 255,840 1,088.40 706.80 1,795.20 County 263,284 1,114.00 724.62 1,838.62 ATTACWW M0. 1 ATTAC."KA ;=MT 1 MOORPARK JORPARK. CALIFORNIA PAUL W_ LAWRASON JR. GtYCoLncMM99*V Mayor of z X99 / BERNARDO M. PEREZ �L. Mayor Pro Tem ACTION• SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk M E M O R A N D U M ITEM G. Q, STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works DATE: January 17, 1991 (Council Meeting 1- 23 -91) SUBJECT: Acquisition of a General Use Vehicle • N " This requests approval of the purchase of a pool car. DISCUSSION The performance of many of the duties of City staff require the use of a vehicle. City owned trucks are provided to maintenance and operations personnel. Travel allowances are provided to management personnel for such expenses. These provisions do not fully address the needs in this area. There are a number of tasks performed by other employees for which no vehicle has been provided. These tasks include errands (i.e. mail delivery bank deposits, etc.), travel (i. e. training, meetings, etc.) and more. Initially the "pool" vehicle will also be made available to the Code Enforcement Technician. As you recall, funds were included in the FY 1990/91 Budget for the acquisition of a four -wheel drive vehicle. To date the quoted purchase prices for a new vehicle of this type, exceed the amount budgeted. Staff is researching the possibility of acquiring this vehicle through the State or County Cooperative Purchasing Program. When acquired, the four -wheel drive vehicle will also be made available for certain activities related to the City's disaster services program. Even subsequent to delivery of the four -wheel drive vehicle, the occasional use of the "pool" vehicle by Code Enforcement personnel will reduce the need to use the four -wheel drive vehicle for routine activities. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 General Use Vehicle January 18, 1990 Page 2 It is anticipated that a low- milage, used, mid -sized car would cost between $9,000 and $12,000. Using the Kelly Blue Book wholesale price as a guide, such a vehicle could be acquired from available stock of an automobile dealer in the area. The cost can be shared between the General Fund and the Community Development Fund to reflect anticipated use by other than General Fund funded activities. It is the recommendation of Staff that the City Council take the following actions: o approve the transfer of $9,000 from the General Fund Reserve and $3,000 from the Community Development Fund Reserve; o appropriate $12,000 in Account # 01 -117 -904 for the acquisition of a "pool" vehicle; o authorize the City Manager to proceed with the acquisition of said vehicle in accordance with the City's purchasing procedures; and, o direct the Finance Department to allocate the final total purchase price of the vehicle as follows: 75% -- General Fund; 25% -- Community Development Fund. PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Of Mayor Pro Tern A< SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember By, LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Summary MOORPARK ITEM 4.4_ OORPARK. CALIFORNIA Gty M9p*V X991 The Honorable City Council Donald P. Reynolds, Jr., Management January 18, 1991 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer i Analys Modifications to the Proposed Revised Planning Fees, as Presented January 9, 1991 The following report is the result of additional analysis by staff applied to the real time cost accounting methodology provided to the Council on January 9, 1991. A change on the application of certain indirect costs for personnel has reduced the proposed fee amount from $74 per hour to $71 per hour. The revised formula for the real time billing rate for the planning staff of $71 per hour is presented in Attachment 111." Discussion This matter was continued on January 9 to January 23 to allow representatives from Building Industry Association, (BIA), and the Chamber of Commerce to meet with staff. This meeting was held on January 14. Prior to the meeting, staff reevaluated this application, and determined that a more thorough consideration of code enforcement activities and related costs, would result in additional deductions that would apply to Department Maintenance and Operations (M +O), Personnel and Use Allowance cost categories, "Attachment 1." BIA and the Chamber of Commerce accepted staff's revised recommendation, after this change was made. In applying the new approach, staff determined that because code enforcement salaries equal approximately 200 of the Department personnel budget, that a 20% deduction should be spread to other related costs categories. Thus, for personnel, each related Position in the Indirect Costs Category, which is part of the Departments Budget, (Finance Officer, Receptionist, Account Clerk, and Deputy City Clerk) received a 20% percent deduction from the percentage of salary plus medical benefits. For M +O, a straight 20, has been deducted from the budgeted amount. In the Use 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 Allowance category, 20% has been deducted, and the staff allocation has changed from 8 staff persons to 5.4 positions after deducting the Code Enforcement Officer, Code Enforcement Technician, and 60% of a Secretary position. The net result is a difference of approximately $33,000 from the totals applied to the rate determination table. Indirect costs were reduced $23,500, and the Use Allowance by $9,500. Calculating the change from $65 per hour to $71 per hour is a 9.2% increase. The attached fee schedule (Attachment "A" to Attachment 11211) reflects this action. The resolution (Attachment 112 ") has been changed to reflect a $71 per hour rate. Recommendation: That the City Council: 1) Adopt ResolutionJ�-, as Presented in Attachment "1," effective January 1, 1991 and rescinding Resolution 89- 605; 2) And authorize staff to return to Council each January in order to revise fees to reflect current City costs. Attachments: 1) Revised Real Time Billing Rate Calculations 2) Proposed Resolution and Fee Schedule ATTACHEMNT "1" 1990/91 LAND USE APPLICATION PROCESSING FEE RATE CALULATIONS Revised, 1/15/91 (" *" indicate modifications) Item 1) Direct Department Costs These are Actual Salaries, Vacancies @ "C" level, Emply + 1 for Ben. 1990/91 A B (A +B) x C +1 Total Yr. Total Med. Leave Position Salary Benefits Benefits Totals --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- - - Associate Planner -------------------------------------- 40,338 13,377 17.69% Assistant Planner 33,186 12,126 15.77% Senior Planner 45,083 14,207 17.69% Senior Planner 41,387 13,560 17.69% Dir. of Community Devel. ------------------------------------------------------------------ 57,528 17,244 19.62% Total 217,521 70,514 Item 2) Department Overhead, (Indirect Costs) 1990/91 City Applied Item Costs Deductions Amount Personnel 3) 397,874 1) 334,626 ** 63,249 Maintenance and Operat * 154,276 2) 110,000 44,276 Capital (Deleted -see use allowance) Fixed Overhead (Deleted -see use allowance) 63,217 52,458 69,778 64,667 89,442 339,562 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 107,525 Deductions- 1) Total Direct Personnel+ CoEm Hon. (9,500) 2) 641 - Professional services 3) Total Pers. Budg., less CEO, CET, 60% Sec., and Med. Ben. for each (Deductions equal $101,076) Revised Deductions * 192845 -20% ** Percentage of F0, Deputy CC, Act. Clrk, Recpt. Salaries applied to Dept. Plus Med. Ben. for each, less 20% for Code Enf. deduction (Deduction of $14436) ATTACHEMNT "1" 1990 /91 LAND USE APPLICATION PROCESSING FEE RATE CALULATIONS Revised, 1/15/91 ( " *" indicate modifications) Item 1) Direct Department Costs These are Actual Salaries, Vacancies @ "C" level, Emply + 1 for Ben. 1990/91 A B (A +B) x C +1 Total Yr. Total Med. Leave Position Salary Benefits Benefits Totals Associate Planner 40,338 13,377 17.69% 63,217 Assistant Planner 33,186 12,126 15.77% 52,458 Senior Planner 45,083 14,207 17.69% 69,778 Senior Planner 41,387 13,560 17.69% 64,667 Dir. of Community Devel. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 57,528 17,244 19.62% 89,442 Total 217,521 70,514 339,562 Item 2) Department Overhead, (Indirect Costs) 1990/91 City Applied Item Costs Deductions Amount - ------------------------- Personnel 3) 397,874 1) 334,626 ** 63,249 Maintenance and Operat * 154,276 2) 110,000 44,276 Capital (Deleted -see use allowance) Fixed Overhead (Deleted -see use allowance) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 107,525 Deductions- 1) Total Direct Personnel+ Comm Hon. (9,500) 2) 641- Professional services 3) Total Pers. Budg., less CEO, CET, 60% Sec., and Med. Ben. for each (Deductions equal $101,076) Revised Deductions * 192845 -20 %= 154,276 ** Percentage of FO, Deputy CC, Act. Clrk, Recpt. Salaries applied to Dept. Plus Med. Ben. for each, less 20% for Code Enf. deduction FO = 6145, DCC = 2999, AC = 1796, Rec. = 3495 for a total of 14436 Item 3) General City Overhead Indirect Costs 1990/91 Total General Indirect Costs 274,942 Deductions 1) Elections+ 80% Dep. City Clerk + Dep. City Clerk Ben. 2) Special Legal Services 3) Capital, (1600) + FO @ 60% + FO Ben + Act. Clrk @ 50 %+ Act Clrk. Ben 4) Capital + CDBG Salary, 19,070 + 60% Recept.+ 60% Rec. Ben 5) 642- Contr Srvcs, 645- Plan Chk, 646- Inspect 6) 100% Assit. to the City Manager Position + Ben. Iten 4) Use Allowance- as of 6/30/89 Total Use Assets Allowance ------------------------- Buildings and structures 1,359,264 27,172 Improve. other than Buildings 524,058 35,112 Office Furniture And Equip. 254,630 17,060 Other equipment 52,767 3,535 ------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- 2,190,719 82,879 Less 20% to account for Code Enf. 16,576 *Revised total 66,303 Allocation Total Employees 32 Department Employees 8 * Less CEO Employees (2.6) 5.4 Percent (5.4/32) 17 Use Allowance Attributable to Department (17% * $66,303) 11,189 * Revisions Equal a Difference of approximately $9,500 From Original Use Allowance Budgeted Item Costs Deduction Net Costs % applied Total Costs City Council 23,900 0 23,900 36% 8,604 City Manager 217,481 6) 69,538 147,943 36% 53,260 City Clerk 116,026 1) 36,943 79,083 36% 28,470 City Attorney 113,000 2) 25,000 88,000 36% 31,680 City Treasurer 1,615 0 1,615 28% 452 Finance Officer 158,833 3) 70,408 88,425 28% 24,759 Administrative Services 505,126 4) 148,931 356,195 28% 99,735 City Engineer 159,310 5) 122,000 37,310 75% 27,983 Total General Indirect Costs 274,942 Deductions 1) Elections+ 80% Dep. City Clerk + Dep. City Clerk Ben. 2) Special Legal Services 3) Capital, (1600) + FO @ 60% + FO Ben + Act. Clrk @ 50 %+ Act Clrk. Ben 4) Capital + CDBG Salary, 19,070 + 60% Recept.+ 60% Rec. Ben 5) 642- Contr Srvcs, 645- Plan Chk, 646- Inspect 6) 100% Assit. to the City Manager Position + Ben. Iten 4) Use Allowance- as of 6/30/89 Total Use Assets Allowance ------------------------- Buildings and structures 1,359,264 27,172 Improve. other than Buildings 524,058 35,112 Office Furniture And Equip. 254,630 17,060 Other equipment 52,767 3,535 ------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- 2,190,719 82,879 Less 20% to account for Code Enf. 16,576 *Revised total 66,303 Allocation Total Employees 32 Department Employees 8 * Less CEO Employees (2.6) 5.4 Percent (5.4/32) 17 Use Allowance Attributable to Department (17% * $66,303) 11,189 * Revisions Equal a Difference of approximately $9,500 From Original Use Allowance RATE DETERMINATION Item 1, Direct Costs 339,562 Item 2, Indirect Costs 107,525 Item 3, General Overhead 274,942 Item 4, Use Allowance 11,189 Adjustment from Prior Year Total Costs 733,217 Divided by Total Hours (2080 * 5 Positions) 10400 RATE 71 PER HOUR BENEFIT RATE CALCULATION TABLES DIRECTLY RELATED STAFF POSITIONS 1990/91 INDIRECTLY RELATED STAFF POSITIONS 1990/91 ANNUAL HOURLY RETIREMENT/ GROUP WORKER'S TOTAL PD LEAVE BENFIT POSITION RATE RATE MEDICARE INSUR COMP BENEFITS BENEFITS RATE Associate Planner 40,338 19.39 - - - -- 13.99% ----------------------------------------------------- 15.94% 1.54% 31.47% 17.69% 54.73% Code Enforcement Officer 30,759 14.79 13.99% 20.70% 20.83% 55.52% 15.77% 80.05% Senior Planner 45,083 21.67 13.99% 14.33% 1.54% 29.86% 17.69% 52.83% Senior Planner 41,387 19.90 13.99% 15.55% 1.54% 31.08% 17.69% 54.27% INDIRECTLY RELATED STAFF POSITIONS 1990/91 ANNUAL HOURLY RETIREMENT/ GROUP WORKER'S TOTAL PD LEAVE BENFIT POSITION RATE RATE MEDICARE INSUR COMP BENEFITS BENEFITS RATE FINANCE OFFICER 16,457 --------------------------------------------- 7.91 13.99% 15.71% 1.551 -------------------------- 31.25% 16.54% 52.96% RECEPTIONIST 8,193 3.94 13.99% 13.51% 1.55% 29.05% 15.77% 49.40% DEPUTY CITY CLERK 4,409 2.12 13.99% 28.67% 1.55% 44.21% 15.77% 66.95% ACCOUNT CLERK 9,816 4.72 13.99% 31.26% 1.55% 46.80% 15.77% 69.95% ASST. TO THE CITY MGR 47,766 22.96 13.99% 6.16% 1.55% 21.70% 19.62% 45.58% ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 90- CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MOORPARK, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SCHEDULE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PROCESSING FEE DEPOSITS EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1991, AND RECSINDING RESOLUTION 89 -605 WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark provides planning services; and WHEREAS, the cost of this service will be offset by fees which accompany land use entitlement requests; and WHEREAS, Community development staff costs are charged against fees, based on real time cost accounting; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Community Development staff shall bill actual time spent on land use applications at a real time cost accounting rate of $71.00 per hour. SECTION 2. Contract Planning Staff shall be billed at cost, plus fifteen percent (15 %). SECTION 3. That the schedule of Land Development Preliminary Processing Fee Deposits shall be as identified as those revised fees shown on Attachment "A" to this resolution. SECTION 4. That this resolution shall be effective January 1, 1991. SECTION 5. That Resolution No. 89 -605; A RESOLUTION FIXING REAL TIME COST ACCOUNTING FEES FOR PLANNING STAFF AND ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PROCESSING FEE DEPOSITS; adopted July 19, 1989, is hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of January, 1991. ATTEST Paul W. Lawrason Jr., Mayor City of Moorpark Lillian E. Kellerman City Clerk ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF MOORPARK LAND DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SCHEDULE Revised, January 1, 1991 PERMIT TYPE FEE DEPOSIT 1. Planned Development a. Mobile Home Park b. Residential ** 2. Commercial Planned Development 3. Industrial Planned Development 4. Conditional Use & Open Space Use Permit a. Residential and accessory uses thereto b. Agricultural and accessory uses thereto C. Commercial /Industrial/ Institutional uses d. Oil Drilling and Production e. Quarries and Mining ** f. Waste Disposal /Treatment 5. Zone Change * ** $1,570 (base) + $7.85 per pad $1,570 (base) + $7.85 $1,727 $1,884 $1,256 $1,727 $2,197 $2,986 $4,709 $4,709 $1,962 * Final cost of processing will be computed upon actual time expended, (based upon the established hourly rates). If final cost is less than the deposit fee received, the unused portion of the deposit fee shall be refunded to the applicant. If final cost is more than the deposit fee received, the balance shall be payable by the applicant up to 75% of original deposit. If the cost of processing is expected to be more than the original deposit, plus 75% of said deposit, the City council may approve the collection of an additional deposit as they deem appropriate. ** If a Residential Planned Development application is filed concurrently with a Tentative Tract Map, the deposit fee for the Residential Planned Development permit shall be reduced by 50 %. * ** On any Zone Change application filed concurrently with a Tentative Tract Map and /or Residential Planned Development permit, the deposit fee for the zone change shall be reduced by 50 %. CITY OF MOORPARK LAND DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING DEPOSIT SCHEDULE PERMIT TYPE FEE DEPOSIT * 6. Tentative Tract Map a. Tentative Tract Map b. Tentative Parcel Map, Parcel Map Waiver or Conditional Certificate of Compliance C. Time extension of approved tentative tract map d. Time extension of approved tentative parcel map e. Parcel map reversion to acreage f. Lot line adjustments 7. Variance a. Existing single family residential 8. Major Modification 9• Minor Modification 10. Administrative Clearance 11. Zone Clearance 12. Appeals 13. Revocation $2,825 (base) + $55.00 per lot or unit $2,197 (base) + $78.50 per lot or unit 50% of current deposit fee 50% of current deposit fee $471 ****(non-refundable) $392 ****(non-refundable) $1,334 $336 80% of current fee deposit 20-0. of current fee deposit or $314, whichever is greater $314 ****(non-refundable) $31.40 + $3.14 per additional lot /unit * ** *(Non - refundable) 25% of current deposit fee or $471, whichever is greater 50% of current deposit fee * * ** (non - refundable) * * ** A non - refundable fee is a one time fee of a specified amount (f lat fee) , intended to account for the average cost of processing. Flat Fees cannot be refunded should the application be withdrawn. CITY OF MOORPARK LAND DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING DEPOSIT SCHEDULE ehRMIT TYPE FEE DEPOSIT * 14. Violation Penalty * * * ** 15. Environmental Impact Reports a. Environmental Impact Report * * * * ** b. Environmental Impact Report Supplement ** C. Special Consultants 16. Land Conservation Act Contract - Agricultural Preserves a. Applications b. Cancellation C. Portion Non - Renewable 17. Sign Permit 18. Landsca a Plan Review & Inspection * * * * ** 19. General Plan Amendments * * * * ** 20. Planned Community * * * * ** 21. Condition Compliance Review 100% of current deposit fee, not to exceed $785 * * ** (non- refundable) $3,139 $1,570 Total prepayment of consultant's estimated cost, or acceptable bond. * * ** (non- refundable) $1,256 $1,256 $1,256 $31.40 $545 $1,570 (base) + $7.85 per acre $1,570 (base) + $15.70 per acre 1000-- of original filing fee * * ** A non - refundable fee is a one time fee of a specified amount (flat fee) intended to account for the average cost of processing. Flat Fees cannot be refunded should the application be withdrawn. * * * ** In addition to deposit fee. * * * * ** Final cost of processing will be computed upon actual time expended (based upon established hourly rates). If final cost is less than the deposit fee received, the unused portion of the deposit fee shall be refunded to the applicant. If final cost is more than the deposit fee received, the balance shall be payable by the applicant. CITY OF MOORPARK LAND DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING DEPOSIT SCHEDULE PERMIT TYPE _. FEE DEPOSIT * 22. Xerox Copies a. 8.5" x 11" and 8.5" x 14" b. 11" x 1711 23. Zoning Maps 24. Other $0.50 for first page + $0.26 per each additional page $1.00 for the first page + $0.75 per each additional page up to nine pages + $0.50 per each additional page thereafter Actual Costs Actual Costs * * * * * ** * * * * * ** Occasionally, special reviews are required and not addressed specifically by this schedule, (such as traffic analysis reviews). These requirements will be determined by the Director of Community Development, based on the nature of the proposed land use request. The Director will make a determination of which use and /or amount listed on the fee schedule is equivalent to that used. Said use application or review shall then use the billing type for a filing fee or deposit. PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tern SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MOORPARK M E M O R A N D U M STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer The Honorable City Council Donald P. Reynolds, Jr., Management Analyst January 23, 1991 Revised Formula For Planning Rate Determination The following provides Council with a final revised formula for calculating City planning fee rates. The proposed rate of $71 per hour does not change. The new application of information brings the fee formula to current status, (as presented in the attachment). Indirect Personnel costs are now calculated in the same manner as Direct (personnel) Costs. General Overhead changed to reflect the current applied percentage of the City Manager's Department to planning permits, ( from 36% to 20 %) . The Use allowance is based on a current a fixed asset analysis, and reflects the actual costs of City Hall facility. This formula is a more direct approach to calculating City costs. The software used to prepare it provides a more straight forward methodology to follow when calculating next year's planning department costs. Please feel free to contact me regarding these changes. Attachment 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, Califomia 93021 (805) 529 -6864 ATTACHKENT 1990 /91 LAND USE APPLICATION PROCESSING FEE RATE CALULATIONS Revised, 1/23/91 Item 1) Direct Departtent Costs These are Actual Salaries, Vacancies @ "C" level, Emply + 1 for Ben. 1990/91 A B (A +B) x C +1 Total Yr. Total Med. Leave Position Salary Benefits Benefits Totals Associate Planner 40,338 13,377 17.69% 63,217 Assistant Planner 33,186 12,126 15.77% 52,458 Senior Planner 45,083 14,207 17.69% 69,778 Senior Planner 41,387 13,560 17.69% 64,667 Dir. of Community Devel. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 57,528 17,244 19.62% 89,442 Total 217,521 70,514 339,562 Item 2) Department Overhead, (Indirect Costs) 1990/91 City Applied Item Costs Deductions Amount ---------------------------------------- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- Personnel (SEE TABLE) N/A 88,675 Haintenance and Operations 192,845 148,569 * 44,276 Capital (Deleted -see use allowance) Fixed Overhead (Deleted -see use allowance) 132,951 Deductions- * 641 - Professional services and 20% of the Department Budget To account for the Code Enforcement Deduction from this cost Item 3) General City Overhead Indirect Costs 1990/91 Total General Indirect Costs 251,271 Deductions 1) Elections+ 80% Dep. City Clerk + Dep. City Clerk Ben. 2) Special Legal Services 3) Capital, (1600) + FO @ 60% + FO Ben + Act. Clrk @ 50 %+ Act Clrk. Ben 4) Capital + CDBG Salary, 19,070 + 60% Recept.+ 60% Rec. Ben 5) 642- Contr Srvcs, 645- Plan Chk, 646- Inspect 6) 100% Assit. to the City Manager Position + Ben, Item 4) Use Allowance- as of 6/30/89 Budgeted Deprec. Use Assets Percentage Item Costs -- - - - - - -= == 850,146 Deduction Net Costs o applied Total Costs City Council ------------------------------------------------------------------ 23,900 Office Furniture And Equip. 0 23,900 ---------------------- 36% 8,604 City Manager City Clerk 217,481 6) 69,538 147,943 20% 29,589 City Attorney 116,026 113,000 1) 2) 36,943 25,000 79,083 88,000 36% 36% 28,470 31,680 City Treasurer 1,615 0 1,615 28% 452 Finance Officer 158,833 3) 70,408 88,425 28% 24,759 Administrative Services 505,126 4) 148,931 356,195 28% 99,735 City Engineer ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 159,310 5) 122,000 371310 75% 27,983 - - - - -- Total General Indirect Costs 251,271 Deductions 1) Elections+ 80% Dep. City Clerk + Dep. City Clerk Ben. 2) Special Legal Services 3) Capital, (1600) + FO @ 60% + FO Ben + Act. Clrk @ 50 %+ Act Clrk. Ben 4) Capital + CDBG Salary, 19,070 + 60% Recept.+ 60% Rec. Ben 5) 642- Contr Srvcs, 645- Plan Chk, 646- Inspect 6) 100% Assit. to the City Manager Position + Ben, Item 4) Use Allowance- as of 6/30/89 Allocation Total Employees 25 Department Employees which use City Hall * Less CEO Related Employees 6.4 Percent (6.4/32) 26% Use Allowance Attributable to Department (24$ * $75,205) 19,252 Total Deprec. Use Assets Percentage Allowance ----------------- Buildings and structures -- - - - - - -= == 850,146 = = = = == = = = 0.02 = == 17,003 Improve. other than Buildings 524,058 0.07 36,684 Office Furniture And Equip. 254,630 0.07 17,824 Other equipment ----------- -- ------ -------- --- ------------- 52,767 --- ---------------------- 0.07 3-694 1,681,601 75,205 Allocation Total Employees 25 Department Employees which use City Hall * Less CEO Related Employees 6.4 Percent (6.4/32) 26% Use Allowance Attributable to Department (24$ * $75,205) 19,252 RATE DETERMINATION Ite' 1, Direct Costs 339,562 Ite* 2, Indirect Costs 132,951 Ite* 3, General Overhead 251,271 Ite* 4, Use Allowance 19,252 Adjustment fro* Prior Year Total Costs 743,036 Divided by Total Hours (2080 * 5 Positions) 10400 RATE 71 PER HOUR TNDIK[CT PERSONNEL COSTS (Personnel. Item 2, Indirect Costs) f + 60% (balance) applicable to Code Enforcement Costs and Has Been Deducted 20% NOT DEDUCTED BECAUSE OF 60% TAKEN FROM SALARY ANNUAL X To APPLIC, HOURLY R[TIREM[NGRUUP WORKER'S TOTAL PO LEAVE BENFIT TOTAL IND. LESS 20% POSITION ======================== SALARY Fee Coot RATE RAT[ MEDICARE INSUk COMP BENEFITS BENEFITS RATE DEPT. COST FOR C.[NF FINANCE OFFICER 42,936 40.00% 17174 8.26 13.99% 6.02% 1.55% 21.56% 17.79X 43.19% 24,591 19,673 RECEPTIONIST 18'732 40.00X 7,493 3.60 13.99% 13180% 1.55% 29,34% 17.79% 52.35% 11,415 9,132 DEPUTY CITY CLERK 21,684 20.00X 4,337 2.09 13.99% 11.92% 1.55% 27.46X 17.79X 50.14% 6,511 5,209 ACCOUNT CLERK 21,684 50.001 10,842 5.21 13.99% 11.92% 1.55% 27.46% 17.79% 50.14% 16,278 13,022 SECRETARY 18,732 40.000 7,493 3.60 13.99% 13.80% 1155% 29.34% 17.79% 52.35% 11,415 11,415 +* ADMIN. SECRETARY ... . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . 25,104 . . .. . .. . ... . . 100.00% . . ... .. . . .. 25,104 .. ... .... 12.07 . . . .. .. . 13.99% .. ...... . 100OX ........ . 1.55% . ........... 25.84% 19.59X 50.49% 37,779 30,223 . ..... . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . .. . ...... . . ..... 107,990 . ........ 88,675 + 60% (balance) applicable to Code Enforcement Costs and Has Been Deducted 20% NOT DEDUCTED BECAUSE OF 60% TAKEN FROM SALARY BENEFIT RATE CALCULATION TABLES DIRECTLY RELATED STAFF POSITIONS 1990/91 INDIRECTLY RELATED STAFF POSITIONS 1990 /91 ANNUAL HOURLY RETIREMENGROUP WORKER'S TOTAL PD LEAVE BENFIT POSITION RATE RATE MEDICARE INSUR COMP BENEFITS BENEFITS RATE Associate Planner 40,338 19.39 13.99% 15.94% 1.54% 31.47% 17.69% 54.73% Code Enforcement Officer 30,759 14.79 13.99% 20.70% 20.83% 55.52% 15.77% 80.05% Senior Planner 45,083 21.67 13.99% 14.33% 1.54% 29.86% 17.69% 52.83% Senior Planner 41,387 19.90 13.99% 15.55% 1.54% 31.08% 17.69% 54.27% INDIRECTLY RELATED STAFF POSITIONS 1990 /91 ANNUAL HOURLY RETIREMENGROUP WORKER'S TOTAL PD LEAVE BENFIT POSITION RATE RATE MEDICARE INSUR COMP BENEFITS BENEFITS RATE FINANCE OFFICER 17,174 8.26 13.99% 15.05% 1.55% 30.59% 16.54% 52.19% RECEPTIONIST 7,493 3.60 13.99% 14.77% 1.55% 30.31% 15.77% 50.86% DEPUTY CITY CLERK 4,337 2.09 13.99% 29.14% 1.55% 44.68% 15.77% 67.50% ACCOUNT CLERK 10,842 5.21 13.99% 28.30% 1.55% 43.84% 15.77% 66.52% ASST. TO THE CITY MGR 47,766 22.96 13.99% 6.16% 1.55% 21.70% 19.62% 45.58% placed in bold for the readers convenience. On September 5 and 19, 1990, the City Council reviewed recommended changes to the proposed Zoning Ordinance as proposed by the Planning Commission and the City Council. Discussion At the City Council meeting of September 19, 1990, staff recommended that the revisions to the second dwelling unit provisions of the proposed Zoning Ordinance be reviewed. Council also advised staff of other needed changes to the Zoning Ordinance and continued the matter to the next regular meeting of October 3, 1990. On October 3, 1991, the City Council reviewed the changes to the second dwelling unit provision and directed staff to bring this matter to the Council once the provisions relating to the Tanner Plan and RPD Permit requirements were incorporated into the Ordinance. This changes have since been included into the attached Ordinance. The City Council has recently approved the use of schools in the M- 1 zone. This has been incorporated in Section 8105 -5 of the attached Zoning Ordinance. Recommendation 1. In as much that this is a lengthy document and it is the first time either the Council or the public has had the opportunity to review the Ordinance in its entirety, staff recommends that the City Council open the public hearing regarding the proposed Zoning Ordinance, take testimony and continue the public hearing until the Council's regular meeting on February 6, 1991. Attachments: 1. Revised Zoning Ordinance 2. Ordinance rescinding current Zoning Ordinance and adopting the Zoning Ordinance shown as Exhibit A. PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tem SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MOORPARK MEMORANDUM ITEM _Gf :�• STEVEN KUENY city M i1(, CALIFORNA city Meefing City Manager CHERYL J.KANE of 2 1991 City Attorney PATR K RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. ACTION: Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE BY City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development DATE: December 18, 1990 (CC meeting of January 23, 1991) SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE Background The present Zoning Ordinance adopted by the City of Moorpark was written by the County of Ventura in the early 19601s. It was revised by the County at various times in a piecemeal fashion during the 1970's until totally rewritten by the County in 1983. The County's Ordinance was revised in part because several of its sections lacked clarity, the length of the Ordinance was cumbersome and some of the County's philosophy had changed since the Ordinance's adoption in the 19601s. The revised County Ordinance has been greatly simplified in that it took out the ambiguity of its predecessor and reduced the length by approximately two - thirds without making substantive changes in content. Since the City adopted the County's Ordinance, several amendments have been made due to public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice by the City. These approved Ordinance Amendments have never been placed in the Ordinance Code Book. As a result, it has been necessary for staff to establish a separate binder with all the appropriate changes just to keep track of matters. This has made it difficult for staff and the public to operate in a business -like manner. The City Council has reviewed the recommendation to rescind the current Ordinance and directed staff to rework the current County Ordinance into the Moorpark Zoning Code until such time that the General Plan is updated and the City rewrites a new Zoning Code. The Planning Commission began reviewing the current County Zoning Ordinance on October 2, 1989 and made specific recommendations for changes in order to address the City's concerns. The attached Ordinance reflects these recommendations. These changes and subsequent City Council recommended changes to the Zoning have been 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING THE CURRENT ZONING ORDINANCE AND ADOPTING A NEW ZONING ORDINANCE SHOWN AS EXHIBIT A WHEREAS, since adoption of the County's Zoning Ordinance, several amendments have been made due to public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice by the City; and WHEREAS, these approved Ordinance amendments have never been placed in the Ordinance Code Book; and as a result. it has been necessary for staff to establish a separate binder with all the appropriate changes to keep track of matters; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the recommendation to rescind the current Ordinance and directed staff to rework the current County Ordinance into the Moorpark Zoning Code until such time that the General Plan is updated and the City rewrites a new Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on this matter beginning on October 2, 1989 and made specific recommendations for changes in order to address the City's concerns; and WHEREAS, the City Council opened and closed public hearings on this matter and reviewed recommended changes to the proposed Zoning Ordinance on September 5 and 19, 1990; and WHEREAS, requested changes to the Zoning Ordinance as directed by the City Council have been made to the Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed rescinding of the current Zoning Ordinance in its entirety and adoption of the current County Ordinance with modifications noted in the attached Ordinance (Exhibit A) is categorically exempt from State CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) in that the adoption of the Ordinance does not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the project is categorically exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 15061 (b) ( 3 ) in that the adoption of the Ordinance does not have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. ATTACHMENT 1 SECTION 2. That the current Zoning Ordinance is rescinded in its entirety. SECTION 3. That the City Council adopts the attached Zoning Ordinance attached (Exhibit A). SECTION 4. That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of the attached Ordinance (Exhibit A) is for any reason held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Moorpark hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted this Ordinance and each and all provisions thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more of said provisions may be declared to be invalid. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of January, 1991. Mayor Paul W. Lawrason Jr. City of Moorpark ATTEST: Lillian E. Kellerman City Clerk PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M.PEREZ Mayor Pro Tem SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk TO: MOORPARK MEMORANDUM The Honorable City Council STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYLJ.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development Qk. DATE. January 23, 1991 SUBJECT: ADDITION TO DEFINITIONS FOR ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE (ITEM NO. 9B) In reviewing Article 2 of the proposed Zoning Ordinance the following two definitions will be added to the final version: Hazardous Waste - A waste, or combination of wastes which because of its quantity, concentration, or physical, chemical or infectious characteristics may do either of the following: 1. Cause or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or increase serious irreversible, or incapacitating reversible illness. 2. Pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, or disposed of, or otherwise managed. Unless expressly provided otherwise, the term "hazardous waste" shall be understood to also include extremely hazardous waste and acutely hazardous waste. (Reference: Section 25117 California Health and Safety Code) Hazardous Waste Facility - All contiguous land and structures, other appurtenances, and improvements on the land used for the treatment, transfer, storage, resource recovery disposal, or recycling of hazardous waste. A hazardous waste facility may consist of one or more treatment, transfer, storage, resource recovery, disposal, or recycling hazardous waste management units, or combinations of those units. (Reference: Section 25117 California Health and Safety Code) 1 799 _Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 In addition to the two addition definitions, the following existing definition shall be amended as shown in bold: Waste Treatment and Disposal - Public or disposal facilities or transfer stations, operated for the purpose of recycling, reclaiming, treating or disposal of garbage, sewage, rubbish, offal, dead animals, oilfield wastes, hazardous waste, or other waste material; originating on or off the premises. 2 J ni 1 LO ?1 1J • GJ 1..f11l.HbV/ LI'It3NJJ 7 6TEMJI-A January 17, 1991 Patrick Richards CITY OF MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 -VIA FACSIMILE- Re: Peach Hill Plaza Request for Six Month Extension Dear Pat: I an writing regarding our request for a time extension for PD 1062 and 1063. At this time we need to request a continuance to the next meeting. While we would like to move forward on this matter as soon as possible, our lenders have not agreed to the additional conditions which you have recommended. We expect to finally meet with them next week to determine whether or not they will proceed. Without their approval, we will not be in a position to go forward on this project. We expect a decision soon and will be in contact with you prior to the next City Council Meeting to discuss this further. I look forward to speaking with you soon. i MOORPARK, City Coj'rV Sincerely, of 7/1_ nneth Shishido KWS /nmc Meeting 1 nL, EMBASSY i Ol_.t INC RWJ South figusm Sum S61C 966 Im Angeles, CA 90011 213 622 3528 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M.PEREZ Mayor Pro Tern SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MUUKYARK I t1v1 "• 12 . 'OORPARK, CALIFORNIA City CoLpdl Meeting of ,z 5 1991 M E M O R A N D U M STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer The Honorable City Council Susan Cauldwe sistant to the City Manager January 16, 1 Residential Refuse Franchise Agreements BACKGROUND Over the past several months, the City Council's Budget and Finance Committee has conducted negotiations with the City's current residential refuse haulers (G.I. Rubbish and Moorpark Disposal) to produce the attached residential refuse franchise agreements. The term of the agreements is retroactive to July 1, 1990 and concludes on June 30, 1995. MAJOR POINTS OF FRANCHISE AGREEMENT Key points of the agreement are listed below. 1. Monthly single - family residential rates will remain at $15.35 for the entire 1991 calendar year barring any government mandated costs or fuel cost increases in excess of 30 percent. The rate includes $1.35 per residence per month for recycling and a four percent franchise to the City calculated on that portion of the rate that does not apply to recycling ($14.00). This will result in approximately $30,000 in revenue to the City for the 1991 calendar year. Franchise fees are retroactive to January 1, 1991. 2. Monthly multi - family residential rates are currently either $9.90, $12.00, or $12.63 per month. Nearly 950 accounts of this type exist. In order to cover operating expenses of the recycling program, rates will be increased by nine percent. Nine percent is the amount of revenue dedicated to recycling under the single - family rate. It is appropriate to dedicate an equal amount 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 The Honorable City Council January 16, 1991 Page 2 under the multi - family rate. A franchise fee of four percent will be paid to the City on that portion of the rate that does not apply to recycling. This will result is approximately $4500 in revenue to the City for the 1991 calendar year. Franchise fees are retroactive to January 1, 1991. 3. Annual requests for rate reviews will be considered in November with any adjustments to be effective in January of the following year. Increases or decreases in the rate will be determined through the use of a formula that calculates changes in 1) operating costs (minus fuel) ; 2 ) fuel; and 3) landfill costs. Each factors is weighted in proportion to its share of total operating expenses. 4. Residential curbside recycling will begin in Moorpark within 60 days after the signing of this agreement. Residents will be provided with one 34- gallon wheeled recycling container to separately dispose of glass, aluminum, plastic, bi- metal, certain plastic, newspaper, and cardboard. All recyclable material will be mixed in the single container. Refuse haulers will collect and market the recyclable materials and will retain all proceeds through the end of the fiscal year. After that time, distribution of the proceeds will be reviewed by the City and haulers to determine if the arrangement is providing the maximum benefit to both parties. Under the current plan, all recyclable material collected in the City will be taken to G.I.'s yard to be sorted and prepared for market. The City, in consultation with the refuse haulers, has the option to modify the type of materials being recycled. 5. Haulers will no longer provide refuse containers. All containers currently in place will become the property and responsibility of each individual homeowner. 6. Concurrent with the implementation of curbside recycling, haulers are not required to collect more than four trash cans per residence on any collection day. Residents will pay additional fees to have refuse in excess of four trash cans collected. This provision will encourage recycling and place the burden of disposal on the generator of the waste. The Honorable City Council January 16, 1991 Page 3 7. The refuse hauler is required to submit quarterly reports to the City. Among the items to be reported are revenue, new or closed accounts, changes in company ownership, current fleet, and any adverse written material received from any regulatory agency. 8. The agreement provides for an annual public review of the refuse haulers's service during the prior year, if the City Council so decides. 9. Upon request, senior citizens, who are heads of households will receive a twenty percent discount but will be limited to two trash cans per week. 10. All City owned locations, with the exception of City Hall's roll -off, will receive free trash collection. 11. Each haulers will pay actual staff costs of annual review (not to exceed 80 hours). OTHER RESIDENTIAL HAULERS E. J. Harrison and Sons currently services approximately 20 residential accounts in the Villa Campesina project. Effective with the implementation of recycling, G.I. Rubbish will take over these accounts. Harrison is aware that the franchise is scheduled to acted upon by the City Council. A letter explaining these changes will be mailed to the residents if the franchise agreements as proposed are approved. RECYCLING PUBLIC INFORMATION AND PUBLICITY Staff will be preparing and distributing information on the City's recycling program shortly. The public information and publicity program are outlined in a separate staff report elsewhere on this agenda. MISCELLANEOUS FEE RESOLUTION A miscellaneous fee resolution, attached to this report, sets the rate for miscellaneous transactions. It is similar to the fee schedule approved in Simi Valley. The Honorable City Council January 16, 1991 Page 4 REPEAL OF EXISTING SOLID WASTE COLLECTOR ORDINANCE In March 1990, the City Council adopted Ordinance 123 (attached) which regulates solid waste in the City. Concurrent with this action, the Council also repealed a section of the Municipal Code relating to solid waste. Staff has determined that it is also necessary at this time to repeal Chapter 7 of Division 4 of the municipal code (attached) relating to the regulation of solid waste collectors. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Introduce Ordinance repealing Chapter 7 of Division 4 of the Moorpark Municipal Code. 2. Approve two exclusive residential refuse franchise agreements with G.I. Rubbish and Moorpark Disposal. 3. Adopt Resolution 91- , a miscellaneous residential refuse fee resolution. Attachments: 1) Ordinance 123 2) Chapter 7 of Division 4 of the Moorpark Municipal Code 3) Ordinance repealing Chapter 7 of Division 4 4) Residential refuse franchise agreements 5) Miscellaneous residential refuse fee resolution refuse ORDINANCE NO. 123 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK REPEALING ARTICLE 1, CHAPTER 4, DIVISION 2 OF THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING CHAPTER 10 TO TITLE 6 TO THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF SOLID WASTE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Article 1, Chapter 4, Division 2 of the Moorpark Municipal Code is hereby repealed. SECTION 2. Chapter 10 of litle 6 of the Moorpark Municipal Code is added to read "CHAPTER 10 - REGULATION OF SOLID WASTE Section 6.10.010 - Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide for the collection and transportation of Solid Waste to a City- designated Disposal Site. The City has determined that public health and safety require the collection, transportation, and disposal of Solid Waste to be controlled and regulated by the City through the system provided in this chapter. Section 6:10.020 - Definitions. a) "Bin "' shall mean a Solid Waste container satisfying the requirements of Section 6.10.040(c). b) "City" shall mean the City of Moorpark. c) "City Manager" shall mean the City Manager of the City of Moorpark. d) "Commercial Collector" shall mean any person, corporation, association, partnership, business, or any individual, group or combination acting as a unit, other than as an employee, authorized by license, franchise, contract, operations agreement or otherwise with the City to collect, transport and dispose of Solid Waste from sources within the City for a Commercial Cus+omer. e) "Commercial Customer" shall mean any person, corporation, association, partnership, business, or any individual, group or combination acting as a unit, other than as an employee, using a Bin or Drop Box for Solid Waste accumulations, conducting a business within a commercial or industrial zone, or operating an apartment, condominium, townhome complex, school, or mobile home park within any zone. For purposes of this chapter, an apartment, condominium, or townhome complex shall contain four (4) units. f) "Disposal Site" shall mean any Recycling center, materials recovery facility, intermediate processing center, incineration facility or landfill where Solid Waste may be taken for intermediate processing or final disposal. g) "Drop Box" shall, mean a Solid Waste container satisfying the requirements of Section 6.10.040(d). h) "Drop Box Transporter" shall mean any person, corporation, association, partnership, business, or any individual, group, or combination acting as a unit, other than as an employee, authorized by license, franchise, contract, operations agreement or otherwise with the City to transport and dispose of Solid Waste from sources within the City for Customers. i) "Hazardous Materials" shall mean any material defined as hazardous in the State Health and Safety Code, as may be amended from time to time; a waste that is hazardous according to the criteria set forth in the California Code of Regulations, as may be amended from time to time or any waste that must be disposed of in a - hazardous waste landfill. j) "Receptacle" shall mean a Solid Waste container satisfying the requirements of Section 6.10.040(b). k) "Recycling" shall mean the process of collecting, sorting, cleansing, treating, and reconstituting materials that would otherwise become Solid Waste, and returning them to the economic mainstream in the form of products which meet thF. quality standards necessary to be used in the marketplace. 1) "Residential Collector" shall mean any person, corporation, association, partnership, business or any individual, group, or combination acting as a unit, other than as an employee, authorized by license, franchise, contract, operations agreement or otherwise with the City to collect, transport and dispose of Solid Waste from sources within the City for a Residential Cw Aomer- m) "Residential Customer" shall mean any non — Commercial Customer. n) "Solid Waste" shall include all putrescible and non - putrescible waste, including, but not limited to, animal feces, food waste, waste paper, newspaper, glass, aluminum, plastic, garbage, cardboard, rags, refuse, household ashes, lawn clippings, tree and shrubbery trimmings, leaves, wearing apparel, household goods, wooden containers, and all worthless, useless, unused, rejected, or cast -off solid or semi -solid matter and commercial and construction waste, such as cement and asphalt, excluding Hazardous Materials as defined in this chapter and dead animals. Section 6.10.030 - Solid Waste Accumulations. a) No Commercial or Residential Customer shall accumulate, keep or deposit Solid Waste upon any lot or parcel of land, whether public or private, other than in Bins, Drop Boxes or Receptacles and in accordance with Sections 6.10.040 and 6.10.050. b) No Commercial or Residential Customer owning, occupying, or having the control of any premises or vacant lot or any person occupying a dwelling within the City shall permit any Solid Waste to become or remain offensive, unsightly, or unsafe to the public health or safety or to deposit, keep, or accumulate, or permit or cause any Solid Waste to be deposited, kept, or accumulated, upon any property, lot, or parcel of land or upon any public or private place, street, lane, alley or driveway, except as allowed by this chapter. c) No Commercial or Residential Customer shall place or cause to be placed any Solid Waste generated upon any property or by any residential, commercial or industrial use into any Receptacle, Drop Box or Bin other than those owned- or controlled by such person, unless permission for such use is granted by the Commercial or Residential Customer owning or controlling the R- ceptacle, Bin or Drop Box. d) No Commercial or Residential Customer owning, occupying or having control of any premises shall set out or cause to be set out for collection any Solid Waste other than that originating on the premises. e) No Commercial or Residential Customer shall dispose of Solid Waste in or near litter receptacles elated by the City in public places for incidential use by pedestrian or vehicular traffic. f) No Commercial or Residential Customer shall accumulate, keep or deposit Solid Waste in such a manner that a public nuisance is created, including, but not limited to, allowing flies, mosquitos, or rodents to breed therein. Section 6.10.040 - Solid Waste Containers. a) Solid Waste shall be kept free of all Hazardous Materials and shall be securely wrapped with paper or plastic and placed in a closed Receptacle, Bin or Drop Box. b) Receptacles shall be made of metal or plastic if barrels, or plastic if bags, and of sufficient strength to prevent them from being broken under ordinary conditions. They shall have a maximum capacity of forty -five (45) gallons, unless issued by the collector, in which case they may have a maximum capacity of fifty -five (55) gallons, and shall not exceed sixty -five (65) pounds when filled. Receptacles shall be equipped with a vermin and animal resistant cover or seal which shall be utilized at all times and side handles if metal or plastic barrels. Receptacles shall be in a condition such that their contents can be fully enclosed and such that they shall stand upright and leave no sharp, jagged or otherwise dangerous corners or edges. c) Bins shall possess a fire resistant lid, which shall be utilized at all times, the top of which shall not exceed (60) inches in height from the surface to the ground. They shall have a capacity of at least one and one -half (1 112) cubic yards but not more than six (6) cubic yards. Bins shall be constructed of metal or other material as approved by the City. All Bins. must be rented or purchased from the City or a Commercial Collector. d) Drop Boxes shall have a capacity of at least ten (10) cubic yards. They shall- be constructed of metal or other material as approved by the City. All Drop Boxes must be rented or purchased from the City or a Commercial Collector. e) Receptacles, Drop Boxes and Bins shall be maintained in a clean, safe and sanitary condition.. Section 6.10.050 - Placement of Containers. a) Any Receptacle, Bin or Drop Box shall be placed for collection on any sidewalk, street, roadway or alley only as provided in this chapter_ b) Any Receptacle or Bin shall be placed for collection along any street, roadway or alley only on the day established for the collection of Solid Waste on the particular route or after 5:30 p.m. on the day immediately prior to such collection, and shall not remain thereon for more than eighteen (18) hours after it has been emptied. c) Any Receptacle placed for collection along a street or roadway shall be placed between the curl) line and the property line as close to the curb line or edq(� ()f the street or roadway as practicable. d) Any Receptacle, Bin or Drop box placed for collection in any alley shall be placed as close to the property line as practicable. e) Any Bin or Drop Box placed in any street, roadway or alley shall require an encroachment permit from the City pursuant to the Moorpark Municipal Code. Section 6.10.060 - Interference with Solid Waste. No person other than a Residential or Commercial Collector, Drop Box Transporter or Customer shall interfere in any manner with any Receptacle, Bin or Drop Box or the contents thereof, nor remove any such Receptacle, Bin or Drop Box from the location where it was placed by the Collector, Transporter or Customer, nor remove the contents of any Receptacle, Bin or Drop Box. Section 6.10.070 - Contract and Payment -for Solid Waste Collection Service. a) All Residential and Commercial Customers in the City shall contract with the City or its agent for the weekly removal of Solid Waste from their property. b) The City or its agent is authorized to charge Residential and Commercial Customers a fee for the collection and transportation of Solid Waste, subject to the approval by the City Council of the fee. The failure of any Customer to promptly remit the service charge when due and payable shall entitle the City or its agent to collect a late fee from that Customer. The level of late fees shall be .approved by the City Council. The maximum* amount of Solid Waste-to be collected at any one time from Residential Customers without any additional charge shall be determined by the City. Customers shall be charged extra for all Solid Waste in excess of the above limits on any given collection day. Section 6.10.080 - Solid Waste Collection. No person, corporation, association, partnership, business, or any individual, group, or combination acting as a unit, other than as an employee shall collect, or enter into an agreement to collect, or provide for the collection or disposal of Solid Waste, unless such person, corporation, association, partnership, business, or any individual, group, or combination acting as a unit, other than as an employee, making or providing for the collection or disposal is authorized by the City to operate within the City by means of a license, franchise, contract, operations agreement or otherwise. Section 6.10.090 - Franchises for Solid Waste Collection. The City reserves the right to grant an exclusive or non - exclusive license, franchise, contract, operations agreement or otherwise for the collection and transportation of Solid Waste from sources within the City under such terms and conditions as are contained in this chapter and as may be prescribed by the City Council. The City may require monetary compensation from Collectors and Transporters, in exchange for the license, franchise, contract, operations agreement or otherwise. A written agreement between the City and the Collector or Transporter shall be required when the City exercises its right to license, franchise, or otherwise contract for the collection and transportation of Solid Waste. Section 6.10.100 - Collection and Transportation Times and Days. a) No Residential Collector or Drop Box Transporter shall collect Solid Waste in the City or pick up or deliver Drop Boxes except between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, nor at any time on Saturdays or Sundays except as provided in Section 6.10.100(d). b) No Commercial Collector shall collect Solid Waste in the City except between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday and between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. on Saturdays, nor at any time on Sundays except as provided in Section 6.10.100(d). c) No Residential or Commercial Collector or Drop Box Transporter shall collect or transport Solid Waste within 200 feet of a public or private elementary, junior high, or high school during the one -half (Z) hour before the commencement of the regular school day and one -half (Z) hour following the conclusion of the regular school day. It shall be the responsibility of the Collector or Transporter to ascertain the various starting and ending times for schools in the City.` d) Whenever a holiday recognized by the City or any Disposal Site falls upon a regularly scheduled collection day, the collections scheduled for that day, and for the remainder of the week, may be picked up one day later than scheduled. The Collector or Transporter shall provide the City with at least ten (10) days prior written notice of the collection schedule for each applicable holiday and the Collector shall place advertisements in one (1) daily newspaper serving the City notifying Customers of the same. Customers shall also be notified of any change to the regular schedule by the Collector or Transporter on the last bill prior t(� the holiday. Section 6.10.110 - Solid Waste [)isposal. a) The City shall approve where Solid Waste generated in the City is transported for disposal. No Collector or Transporter shall dispose of Solid Waste at a Disposal Site owned or controlled by the Collector or Transporter or its narent or holding company unless expressly granted by the City. b) No person, including a Collector or Transporter, shall burn any Solid Waste within the City at any time, except as otherwise permitted by law. c) No person, including a Collector or Transporter, shall bury or dump any Solid Waste within the City, except at a designated Disposal Site and then only in accordance with the rules and regulations governing the use of such Disposal Site. d) No Residential Collector shall provide less than weekly collection of Solid Waste from all Residential Customers in the City when such Solid Waste is properly placed for collection on the day of collection. e) No Commercial Collector or Drop Box Transporter shall fail to collect Solid Waste accumulated by each Commercial Customer as many times as requested by the Commercial Customer or once each week, whichever is more frequent. f) No Residential Collector collecting or transporting Solid Waste within the City shall create noise levels in excess of 65 decibels. No Commercial Collector or Drop Box Transporter collecting or transporting Solid Waste within the City shall create noise levels in excess of 70 decibels. - g) No Collector or Transporter shall fail to maintain Bins and Drop Boxes other than in good repair." SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid - or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said.City; shill make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the record,> of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is pass (,d and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of the government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21s _day of March , 1990. Paul W. La rason, Jr. Mayor Lillian E. Kell man City Clerk ADM. 901311 -n,- CP/ /; G CHAPTER 7 - REGULATION OF SOLID WASTE STORAGE, COLLECTION, DISPOSAL, TRANSFER, RESOURCE RECOVERY, AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERMITS AND FEES. Repealed and reenacted September 20, 1977 - ORD. 3337 Sec. 4700 = DESIGNATION - Pursuant to Government Code Section 66796, the Environmental Services Department of the Environmental Resource Agency of the County of Ventura is hereby designated as the enforcement agency to carry out the provisions of the Nejedly - Z'berg -Dills Solid Waste and Resource Recovery Act of 1972, Section 66700 et seq. of the Government Code and the Z'berg - Kapiloff Solid Waste Control Act of 1976, Section 66795, et,seq., of the Government Code. The Environmental Services Department shall enforce all provisions of this ordinance and carry out the duties specified in Section 66796.10 of the Government Code, except the Enforcement of Hazardous -Waste Regulations specifically designated to the State Department of Health. Sec. 4701 -1 - DEFINITION OF TERMS - The provisions of this chapter shall be construed in accordance with the following definitions of terms and the definitions provided in Title 14, Division 7, Chapter 3., Article 4, of the California Administrative Code. i Sec. 4701 -1 - Approved Disposal Area - "Approved Disposal Area" shall mean any site, location, tract of land, area, building, structure or premise authorized by law as a place for the disposal of solid waste for which a health permit has been issued by the Department. Sec. 4701 -2 - Board - "Board" shall mean the Board of Supervisors County of Ventura. of the sec. 4701 -3 - Collector - "Collector" shall mean any person engaged in the business of collecting or transporting solid waste in any part of the unincorporated area of the County of Ventura. Sec. 4701 -4 - Director - "Director" shall mean the Director of the Environmental Services Department (Deputy Health Officer) of the Environmental Resource Agency or his designated representative. Sec. 4701 -5 - Department - "Department" shall mean the Environmental Services Department of the Environmental Resource Agency of the County of Ventura. Sec. 4701 -6 - Solid Waste - "Solid Waste" as used herein shall include any or all of the following: garbage, swill, refuse, cans, bottles, papers, vegetable matter and brush, carcass of any slaughter pen or butcher shop, trash, rubbish, abandoned and unidentifiable vehicles and vehicle parts, abandoned iceboxes, appliances and fixtures, rock, rubble, masonry, glass, Plaster, demolition wastes, sludge, brine, processed products wastes, medical service wastes, hazardous wastes, and toxic wastes, including those definitions of solid wastes as identified in Title 14, Division 7, Chapter 3, Article 4 of the California Administrative Code. Sec. 4701 -7 - Person - "Person" shall inc ne include all definitions as defined in Section 66715 of the Government Code. 1 4 OC- I Sec. 4701 -8 - Farms or Ranches - "Farms or Ranches" shall mean property that is devoted entirely to commercial agricultural or animal husbandry purposes, including the feeding and raising of livestock for dairying or for poultry raising purposes. Sec. 4701 -9 - Medical Service Waste - "Medical Service Wastes" shall include all infectious waste as defined in Section 70847(d), Title 22, California Administrative Code, Division 5. Sec. 4701 -10 - Public Nuisance - "Public Nuisance" includes anything which is injurious to h uman health or is indecent or offensive to the senses and interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property, and affects at the same time an entire community or neighborhood or any considerable number of persons although the extent of annoyance or damage inflicted upon the individual may be unequal and which occurs as a result of the storage, removal, transport, processing or disposal of solid waste. Sec. 4702 - DISPOSAL AREA - No person shall dispose of any solid waste place in the unincorporated area of the County other tha in any n an approved disposal area for which a health permit has been issued by the Department or as provided in Section 4704. Sec. 4703 - REMOVAL OF SOLID WASTE FROM PREMISES - All solid waste produced or accumulated in or about any premises situated within the unincorporated area of the County shall be stored in compliance with Title 14 of the California Administrative Code. All residential refuse as defined in Section 17225.57 of Title 14, California Administrative Code, shall be disposed of or removed from the premises at least once each week. Sec. 4704 - FARMS AND RANCHES - An owner or occupant of a farm or ranch may dispose of solid waste which originates on such property by burying said solid waste on said property at least once each week and at least 800 feet from any public right -of -way or from the nearest building used for human habitation. Such solid waste is to be covered with a minimum of 12 inches of soil. Sec. 4705 - FEEDING VEGETABLE WASTE TO FARM ANIMALS - This chapter shall not be construed to prohibit the feeding of vegetable matter to farm animals or require that health permits be obtained for this purpose, where such activities are otherwise authorized by Section 4133 of the Ventura County Ordinance Code or applicable State statutes. Sec. 4706 - SOLID WASTE ON OCCUPIED PRIVATE PROPERTY - Every owner or person in control of private property shall properly store and maintain accumulations of solid waste so that it will be prevented from being carried or deposited by the elements upon any street, sidewalk or other public place or upon the private property of another person. Sec. 4707 - SOLID WASTE ACCUMULATIONS AS A PUBLIC I`r- UISANCE - No person shall maintain any accumulations of solid waste which are a public nuisance nor shall any person permit another person to maintain on his premises any accumulations of solid waste which are a public nuisance. 4 -45 OC -1 I Sec. 4708 - NOTICE TO REMOVE SOLID WASTE - The Department is hereby authorized to notify the owner or occupant of any private property within the County, or the agent of such owner or occupant, to properly dispose of solid waste located on such property which is a public nuisance. Such notice shall be by personal issuance of a warning citation or by certified mail addressed to said owner, occupant, or the agent thereof, at his last known address. Sec. 4709 - REMOVAL OF SOLID WASTE BY COUNTY - Upon the failure, neglect or refusal of the person so notified to properly dispose of putrescible solid waste within seven (7) days and non - putrescible solid waste within thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice as provided in Sec. 4708 or after the notice has been posted on the property, the Department shall cause such solid waste to be removed and properly disposed of. In the event the notice is returned to the County because of inability to make delivery thereof, provided the same was properly addressed to the last known address of such owner, occupant, or agent thereof, the Department shall cause such solid waste to be removed and properly disposed. Sec. 4710 - EMERGENCY REMOVAL OF SOLID WASTES - Solid Waste which is determined by the Director to be an immediate public health hazard may be removed by the Department from a property through summary abatement without judicial hearing or notice of hearing. When the Department has effected the removal of such solid waste, the owner or occupant of the property shall be liable to the County for the cost of such removal and disposal. Sec. 4711 BY OWNER: A LIEN Upn - RIGHT OF THE BOARD TO COMPEL OWNER TO RFMnvar. Rv mur __ SOLID WASTE: DEFAULT buildings, grounds or lots to remove solids waste from buildings g or occupant of adjacent sidewalks. If he defaults, after notice prescribed by the Board, it may authorize the removal or destruction of the solid waste at his expense by the Director. The Board may prescribe a procedure for the removal or destruction and make the expense a lien upon the buildings or grounds. Sec. 4711 -1 - Declaration of Public Nuisance - The Board may declare by resolution as public nuisance, and abate: (a) All solid waste upon the streets, sidewalks, or private property in the County. (b) All solid waste upon parkways, sidewalks, or private property in the County. Sec. 4711 -2 - Resolution: Contents - The resolution shall: (a) Refer to the street by its commonly known name. (b) Describe the property upon which or in front of which the nuisance exists by giving its lot and block number according to the official County Assessment Map. Sec. 4711 -3 - Number of Streets, Sidewalks, etc. ' ohich may be included in Resolution * lution• Any number of streets, sidewalks, or parcels of private property may be included in one resolution. i - '6 OC -1 Sec. 4711 -4 - Declaring Solid Waste on Specified Parcels to be Recurren Nuisances: Abatements on Notice and Hearin e: Contents of Notice t the At time it adopts the resolution as provided for by Sections 4711 -2 and 4711 -3, the Board may also find and declare that solid waste on specified parcels of Property are recurrent nuisances. Such recurrent nuisances shall be abated in accordnce with the provisions of this article, provided, that upon the second and any subsequent occurrence of such nuisance on the same parcel or parcels within the same calendar year, no further hearings need be held and it shall be sufficient to mail a violation notice to the owners of the property as they and their addresses appear on the current assessment roll. The notice shall refer to and describe the property and shall state that solid waste accumulations of a recurrent nature are on or in front of the property, and that the same constitutes a public nuisance which must be abated by the removal of said solid waste, and that otherwise they will be removed and the nuisance will be abated by the County authorities, in which case, the cost of such removal shall be assessed upon the parcel and lands from which or in front of which such solid waste is removed and that upon confirmation such cost will constitute a lien upon such parcel or lands until paid. Sec. 4711 -5 - Notices: Manner of Posting - After passage of the resolution, the Director shall cause notices to be conspicuously posted on or in front of the property on or in front of which the nuisance exists. He shall post: (a) One notice to each separately owned parcel of property of not over fifty yards frontage. (b) Not more than two notices to any such parcel of one hundred yards frontage or less. (c) Notices at not more than one hundred yards apart if the frontage of such a parcel is greater than one hundred yards. Sec. 4711 -6 - Notices: Heading - The heading of the notices shall be "Notice to remove solid waste" in letters not less than one inch in height. Sec. 4711 -7 - Form of Notice The notice shall be substantially in the following form: NOTICE TO REMOVE SOLID WASTE Notice is hereby given that on the Ventura County Board of Supervisors passed ad resolution declaring that solid waste is located upon or in front of property on this street, in and more particularly described in the resolution, and that such soli e constitutes a public nuisance which must be abated by removal. Otherwise such solid waste will be removed and the nuisance abated by the County and the cost of removal assessed upon the land from or in front of which the solid waste is removed and will constitute a lien upon such land until paid. Reference is hereby made to the resolution for further particulars. A copy of said resolution is on file in the office of the County Clerk. t• w -47 CC -1 i "'t , All property owners having any objections to the proposed removal of the solid waste are hereby notified to attend a meeting of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors to be held (give date), when their objections will be heard and given due consideration. Dated this day of , 19 Director, Environmental Services Department Sec. 4711 -8 - Time of posting notices - The notices shall be posted at least fourteen (14) days prior to the time for hearing objections by the Board. Sec. 4711 -9 - Mailing of Notices by County Clerk - As an alternative to Posting notice of the resolution and notice of the meeting when objections will be heard, the Board may direct the County Clerk to mail written notice of the proposed abatement to all persons owning property described in the resolution. The County Clerk shall cause such written notice to be mailed to each person to whom such described property is assessed in the last equalized assessment roll available on the date the resolution was adopted by the Board. The notices mailed by the County Clerk shall be mailed at least fourteen (14) days prior to the time for hearing objections by the Board. The notices mailed by the County Clerk shall be substantially in the form provided by Section 4711 -9, except, that notices shall be signed by the County Clerk and the heading of the notice need not comply with Section 4711 -8. Section 4711 -10 - Hearing of Objections: Continuances - At the time stated in the notices, the Board shall hear and consider all objections to the proposed removal of solid waste. It may continue the hearing from time to time. Sec. 4711 -11 - Decision upon objections: Acquisitions of Jurisdiction by_ Board - By motion or resolution at the conclusion of the hearing the Board shall allow or overrule any objections. Sec. 4711 -12 - Decision of Board is final - The decision of the Board is final. Sec. 4711 -13 - Order to Abate Nuisance: Form of Order - If objections have the Director not been made or after the Board has disposed f those made, it shall order to abate the nuisance by having the solid waste removed. The order shall be made by motion or resolution. Sec. 4711 -14 - Entry Upon Private Property to Abate Nuisance - The Director may enter upon private property to abate the nuisance. Sec. 4711 -15 - Removal of Solid Waste by Property Owner - Before the Director arrives, any property owner may remove the solid waste at his own expense. Sec. 4711 -16 - Account of Cost of Abatement: Submission of Itemized Report to Board - The Director shall keep an account of the cost of abatement in fro�f or on each separate parcel of land where the work is done by him. He shall submit to the Board for confirmation an itemized written report showing such cost. 4 -i.3 OC -: Sec. 4711 -17 - Posting Copy of Re ort - A co for at least three days p PY of the chamber door of the Board, with a notice of the time of e Sec. - 4711 -18 - Hearing on R Motion or Resolution - At the report, the Board shall hear liable to be assessed for the deemed necessary. The Board resolution. rt: Modification: report shall be posted Board*on or near the submission. Confirmation of Re ort b time fixed for receiving and considering the it with any objections of the property owners abatement. It may modify the report if it is shall then confirm the report by motion or Sec. 4711 -19 - Abatement of Nuisance by Contracts: Letting of Contracts: Account and Submission of Itemized Re ort b Contractors - Abatement of the nuisance may in the discretion of the Board be performed by contract awarded by the Board on the basis of competitive bids let to the lowest responsible bidder. Ia such event the contractor shall keep the account and submit the itemized written report for each separate parc 4711 -18. el of land required by Section Sec- 4711 -20 - Cost of Abatement Constitutes S ecial Assessment: Lien - The cost of abatement in front of or upon each parcel of land constitutes a special assessment against that parcel. After the assessment is made confirmed, it is a lien on the a 1 and p rce Sec. 4711 -21 - Report to Assessor and Tax Collector: Addition of Assessment to Tax Bill - After confirmation of the report, a copy s County Assessor and the Tax Collector, who shall add h he amount n of the assessment to the next regular tax bill levied against the parcel for County Purposes. Sec. 4711 -22 - En roof Assessments upon County Tax Roll shall enter each assessment on the County Tax roll, - The County Auditor land. opposite the parcel of Sec. 4711 -23 - Collection of Assessment: Penalties and Procedure for Fore- closure: Installment Pa eats: Enforcement Procedure: Interest - The amount of ------ the assessment shall be collected at the time and in the manner of ordinary County taxes. If delinquent, the amount is subject to the same penalties and procedure of foreclosure and sale provided for ordinary County taxes. _ Sec. 4711 -24 - Alternative Method: Issuance of Se arate Bills and Recei is As an alternative method, the County Tax Collector in his discretion may collect the assessments without reference to the general taxes by issuing separate bills and receipts for the assessment. Sec. 4711 -25 - implication of Laws Relating to Levy. Collection and Enforce - If of Count Taxes Laws relating to the levy, collection, and enforcement of County taxes apply to real property to which suc such special assessment taxes, except that if any h cost of abatement relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bonafide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes would become delinquent, then such cost of abatement shall not result in a lien against such real property but instead shall collection. be transferred to the unsecured roll for 4 -4q OC -1 Sec. 4711 -26 - Receipt of Amounts and Issuance of Receipts by Director - The Director may receive the amount due on the abatement cost and issue receipt at any time after the confirmation of the report and until 10 days before a copy is given to the County Assessor and Tax Collector, or, where a certified copy is filed with the County Auditor, until August 1st following the confirmation of the report. Sec. 4711 -27 Must be Filed: Refund of Tax Erroneously Levied: Filing Claim: When Claim Verification The Board may order refunded all or part of a tax paid pursuant to this article if it finds that all or part of the tax has been erroneously levied. A tax, or part, shall not be refunded unless a claim is filed with the Clerk of the Board on or before November 1st after the tax became due and payable. The claim shall be verified by the person who paid the tax, or his guardian, executor, or administrator. Sec. 4712 - HEALTH PERMIT - The Department may, upon a majority vote of the Board, prescribe and /or revise Health Permit fees to be collected from each operator of a solid waste facility or from any person who conducts solid waste handling. Issuance of such permit shall be conditioned upon compliance with the solid waste management standards established under the Nejedly - Z'berg -Dills Solid Waste and Resource Recovery Act of 1972 and the Z'berg - Kapiloff Solid Waste Control Act of 1976, and Title 14 of the California Administrative Code. Such health permit shall be in addition to any other license or permit required by this County, or any other public jurisdiction, including, but not limited to, the County Fire Marshall, Solid Waste Management Board, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Sec. 4712 -1 - Health Permit Fee - A health permit fee schedule shall be determined by resolution of the Board of Supervisors of Ventura County. Sec. 4712 -2 - Violation of Health Permit Conditions - After an inspection of a facility by the Department, if it is determined that the facility does not meet the minimum requirements of the health permit, a notice will be given to the permittee for correction of the violations at the facility. If the corrections are not completed within a reasonable period of time, as determined by the Department, the Department hearing procedure may be initiated to determine if the health permit should be suspended or revoked. Such suspension or revocation is to be conducted in compliance with permit procedures as established by the Z'berg - Kapiloff Solid Waste Control Act of 1976. Sec. 4712 -3 - Operating Without a Valid Health Permit - The operation of any solid waste collection, storage or disposal facility without a valid health permit issued by the Department, when required by the Department, shall be a misdemeanor. Sec. 4712 -4 - Collection of Fees - The County Tax Collector shall collect the permit fees and penalties as directed by this ordinance, when he receives the approved application for a permit from the Environmental Health Division and perform such other duties as are by this ordinance prescribed. Sec. 4713 - PERMIT TO OPERATE A SOLID WASTE FACILITY - An solid waste r proposing Y person operating a Y pro osin to become an operator of a solid waste facility shall comply with the provisions of Sec. 66796.30 of the Government Code. 4 -50 OC -1 I Sec. 4713-1 - Application Fee - Each application required to be filed under r this section shall be accompanied by a filing fee according to the ordinance I1 adopted by the Board of Supervisors to reflect the cost of processing such applications. This fee is in addition to Section 4712 and 4714 of this code. (AM. ORD. 3684- 4/10/84) Sec. 4714 - SOLID .WASTE CONTROL FEES - The Department may, upon a majority vote of the Board, prescribe and revise solid waste control fees to be collected from each operator of a solid waste facility or from any person who conducts solid waste handling. Such fee or other charge shall be based upon either the weight, volume, or type of solid waste which is received or handled by any such operator or person- or upon any other appropriate parameter or any combination of the. for commensurate with the cost of administering the program. Sec. 4715 - MEDICAL SERVICE WASTE CERTIFICATION FEE - Upon filing with the Director an application for certification of medical service waste disposal methods as required by the state, each applicant shall pay a certification fee established by resolution of the Board. The fee shall represent the costs of administration of Title 22, Division 5, of the California Administrative Code and Division 2, Chapter 1, of the California Health and Safety Code. Sec. 4715.5 - SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FEE - Any person operating a solid waste facility shall pay a solid waste management fee as set forth in the schedule adopted by resolution of the Board of Supervisors. Said fee shall be paid annually by any such person on or before June 30 of each year following the effective date of this section. The solid waste managmeent fee shall be made payable to the Ventura County Resouce Management Agency. Payment of the fee shall be accompanied by a statement from the operator specifying and certifying the total amount of gross receipts, and of tonnage of solid waste, received during the preceding twelve month period. This fee shall be in addition to the fees set forth in sections 4712, 4713, 4714, and 4715 of this chapter. Sec. 4715.5 -1 - Records - Documentation substantiating the gross receipts and tonnage upon which the solid waste management fee is based shall be maintained by the person operating a solid waste facility and submitted, upon three days written notice, for review by the director of the Ventura County Resource Management Agency. Also, upon receipt of a minimum three "days written notice, a person operating a solid waste facility shall provide access to the director of the Resource Management Agency or his designee for the purpose of monitoring the weighing and receipt procedure at the disposal site in order to verify the accuracy of the data submitted. Sec. 4716 - RECEPTACLES - Every lessee or occupant of any private dwelling house, and every owner or agent of a hotel, restaurant, eating house, boarding house or other building where meals are furnished, and every owner and every other person having solid waste in the unincorporated area of the County of Ventura, shall provide, and at all times keep within said building or conveniently located near said building, suitable and sufficient rain -tight receptacles, each capable of holding a maximum of fifty -five (55) gallons of solid waste, and shall cause to be deposited in such containers and not elsewhere, all solid waste accumulating on said premises. Where the permit holder provides their own residential receptacles, weight and capacity requirements may be waived by the Department. Commercial wastes such as: demolition wastes, bulky wastes, toxic wastes, 4 -51 OC -2 hazardous wastes, infectious waste and special wastes must be stored in a manner approved by the Department. Sec. 4716 -1 - Covers - The receptacles shall be equipped with suitable bails or handles and shall have tightly fitted covers, and shall not leak nor permit the escape of odors. Commercial bins shall also have tight fitting lids or covers. When residential receptacles are provided by the pick -up service, tight fitting lids or covers shall also be provided by the service. Sec. 4716 -2 - Weight of Receptacles - The weight of the solid waste container and its content not exceed eighty (80) pounds, unless approved by the Department. Sec. 4716 -3 - Placement of Receptacles - Such receptacles shall be so located on the premises as -Co be readily accessible to the refuse collector or permit holder who is required to render pickup services to the premises. In the case of residential pickup service, containers shall be made accessible to the collection vehicle at the nearest public traveled thoroughfare, or any other location approved by the Department. Sec. 4716 -4 - Time Limits on Placement - Solid waste receptacles shall not be placed adjacent to the ;tree F for pickup service before four (4) p.m. of the day preceeding the scheduled collection nor shall such containers be permitted to remain at the place of collection after eight (8) p.m. on the day of collection. Sec. 4716 -5 - Receptacles Furnished by Permit Holder - Solid waste receptacles furnished by a permit holder for residential use as a part of its service shall be a suitable container as approved by the Department. _Sec. 4716 -6 - Bulky and Miscellaneous Solid Waste - In lieu of being deposited in portable receptacles, garden trimmings and other bulky miscellaneous solid waste may be wrapped or tied in bundles not exceeding four (4) feet in length and two (2) feet in diameter and not exceeding eighty (80) pounds gross weight or may be deposited in a sturdy or substantial cardboard box or other disposal container not exceeding twelve (12) cubic feet in capacity nor eighty (80) pounds gross weight per receptacle. Sec. 4716 -7 - Commercial Bins - In lieu of using portable receptacles for the deposit of solid waste, commercial establishments may use bins constructed for such purpose and approved by the Department. Such bins shall have lids which prevent the escape of trash and odors. Such bins shall not leak liquid and waste fluids. Sec. 4716 -8 - Approved Use of Receptacles - Household solid waste shall be placed only in receptacles provided for that purpose by the disposal service or the user. Placement of household solid waste in commercial receptacles not provided for that purpose is prohibited. Sec. 4716 -9 - Preparation of Garbage - All wet garbage properly bagged or wrapped so as to contain odors andfluids and dtolpreventt the attraction and propogation of vectors.. 4-52 oC -1 Sec. 4716 -10 - Effective Date - All persons required to have receptacle covers under the provisions of Section 4716 -1 of the Ventura County Ordinance Code shall have ninety (90) days after the effective date of the Ordinance to do SO. Sec. 4716 -11 - Public Receptacles - No household solid waste shall be disposed of in or near litter receptacles placed in public places or thoroughfares for the purpose of use by transient or vehicular traffic. Sec. 4717 - COLLECTION AND TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT - For reasons of nuisance and vector problems, uncleaned refuse collection vehicles containing putrescible materials shall not be stored on public streets, roads, or on private property which- causes a public nuisance, except under emergency conditions. The collection service operator must designate a location where the vehicles will be parked when not in service. All collection and transportation equipment shall comply with the standards set forth in the California Administrative Code, Title 14, Division 7, Chapter 3, Article 5. Sec. 4718 - TRANSFER ANTI - LITTER AND PROCESSING STATION STANDARDS transfer, anti - litter and processing stations shall be operated in accordance with the standards established in the California Administrative Code, Title 14, Division 7, Chapter 3, Article 6. Sec. 4719. - DISPOSAL SITE STANDARDS - All disposal sites and sanitary landfill sites shall be operated in compliance with the standards established in the California Administrative Code, Title 14, Division 7, Chapter 3, Article 7. The State Department of Health shall exercise the authority to regulate the processing, handling and disposal of hazardous and extremely hazardous wastes in the operations of solid waste facilities. Sec. 4720_- AGRICULTURAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT STANDARDS - The management of all agricultural solid wastes shall comply with the standards established in the California Administrative Code, Title 14, Division 7, Chapter 3, Article 8. Sec. 4721 - VIOLATIONS - A person shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor for each separate__of�fense for each day during any portion of which any violation of this chapter is committed, constituted or permitted to occur or exist. 4 -53 OC -1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK RESCINDING CHAPTER 7 OF DIVISION 4 OF THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 7 of Division 4 of the Moorpark Municipal Code is hereby repealed; SECTION 2. Ordinance 123 has superseded Chapter 7 of Division 4 of the Moorpark Municipal Code. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective on March 8, 1991; SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th day of February 1991. Paul W. Lawrason Jr. Mayor ATTEST: Lillian E. Kellerman City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING MISCELLANEOUS FEES RELATIVE TO RESIDENTIAL REFUSE COLLECTION. WHEREAS, it is appropriate for the City to establish miscellaneous fees relative to residential refuse collection; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. All miscellaneous fees established pursuant to this resolution shall be reviewed and updated annually by the City Council as part of its annual review of residential refuse rates. SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized to set any miscellaneous fees and charges not contained in this resolution not to exceed $25.00. The City Clerk shall maintain a list all fees established by the City Manager and shall inform the City Council in writing of each such fee within 15 days after its establishment by the City Manager. City council approval is required for fees in excess of $25.00 SECTION 3. That the fee schedule attached as Exhibit A, Miscellaneous Fees Relative to Residential Refuse Collection is hereby approved. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 23rd day of January 1991. Paul W. Lawrason Jr. Mayor ATTEST: Lillian E. Kellerman City Clerk EXHIBIT A MISCELLANEOUS FEES RELATIVE TO RESIDENTIAL REFUSE COLLECTION 6. 3 cubic yard bin (one pick -up per 7. Extra can charge 8. Senior citizen d (applies to head (permanent) week) $80.00 per month (temporary) $2 per can iscount of household only) 20% discount on monthly rate COST 1. Start -up fee $15.00 2. Late charge (for invoices 70 days past due) $5.00 per month past due 3. Returned check charge $10.00 4. 40 cubic yard roll -off Not to exceed $115.00 plus landfill costs per pick -up 5. 3 cubic yard bin (temporary) Not to exceed $60.00 per pick -up 6. 3 cubic yard bin (one pick -up per 7. Extra can charge 8. Senior citizen d (applies to head (permanent) week) $80.00 per month (temporary) $2 per can iscount of household only) 20% discount on monthly rate MOORPARK ITEM PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. MOORP ►a" °��, STEVEN KUENY Mayor pN �K. � � °v City Manager BERNARDO M. PEREZ ; CHERYL J. Manager Mayor Pro Tem of City Attorney A SCOTT MONTGOMERY - o PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Councilmember CTION. v on Director of JOHN E. WOZNIAK °o4q* , ^ Community Development Councilmember `° '''y JOHN F. KNIPE LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Engineer City Clerk JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE M E M O R A N D U M City Treasurer TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Steven Kueny, City Manager S/4 DATE: January 18, 1991 SUBJECT: Spring Road - Peach Hill Road Intersection Redesign The attached January 17, 1991 memorandum from the City Engineer presents background information concerning the subject intersection. Prior to the October 1990 Council approval of the Carlsberg Specific Plan, Carlsberg had prepared street improvement plans for this intersection that provided for four travel lanes on Spring Road. In addition, the City Engineer had designed traffic signals for the intersection consistent with the four travel lanes. The Council's action reduced Spring Road to two travel lanes. In November 1990, the Council deferred proceeding with construction of the signal to consider if the Spring Road improvements on the Presbyterian Church frontage should be consistent with the Spring Road street section approved as part of the Carlsberg Specific Plan. I recommend that the reduced street section discussed in the City Engineer's memorandum be approved. The redesign would be funded by the City, not the church (or Carlsberg), and does not appear to impact the church's construction of street improvements. It may reduce the cost of their improvements. The additional right -of -way would be landscaped in a similar manner to the parkway at the southwest corner of the intersection. The landscaping improvements within the right - of -way would be funded by the City. If sufficient funds remain after construction of the signal, the landscaping could be funded from this source or from other City sources 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 including AD 84 -2, Gas Tax or General Fund. All of the existing 94 feet of right -of -way should be retained in the event the street is widened in the future and to be consistent with the action taken on the Carlsberg Specific Plan. The traffic signal is funded by a $134,000 appropriation of Gann Funds as an advance to the Tierra Rejada Road /Spring Road AOC. The redesign would be funded from this same source. The redesign is expected to take 4 -6 weeks. It is also possible that SB140 funds could become available to assist with funding this project. Based upon discussions with Caltrans, we estimate that about $20,000 will probably be available if the City awards the project by June 30, 1991. If the project is not awarded by then, the SB140 funding would be delayed one year and could be reduced. A status report on the City's SB140 funding.requests should be presented to the Council in February. The SB140 funds started as the Transportation Demonstration Program and has evolved into the State /Local Partnership Program. The City submitted applications in 1989. It appears that most awards are substantially reduced from the amounts requested. As you will recall, the City received $100,774 from SB140 for the Los Angeles Avenue West Widening Project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the City Manager to proceed with taking the necessary actions for redesign of the Spring Road street improvements on the Presbyterian Church frontage and the traffic signal at the Spring Road /Peach Hill Road intersection consistent with this report and the City Engineer's January 17, 1991 memorandum. SK:sc 1183.tem Attachments c: Moorpark Presbyterian Church PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tern SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MOORPARK MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: John F. Knipe, City Engine DATE: January 17, 1991 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYLJ.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer SUBJECT: SPRING ROAD - PEACH HILL ROAD INTERSECTION REDESIGN BACKGROUND Per recent City Council action on the Carlsberg Specific Plan, a modified street section was approved for Spring Road. As approved, Spring Road will have one travel lane in each direction. This two lane roadway would be approximately 54 feet curb to curb. Carlsberg Financial Corporation would provide the necessary paveout for the two lane roadway and provide an irrevocable offer of the additional right -of -way and slope easements in case a wider four lane roadway is deemed necessary in the future. The location of the sidewalk will be determined at the time landscape plans are reviewed and approved by the City. The existing improvements north of the subject intersection (adjacent to the Catholic Church) measure 78 feet curb to curb with 8 foot sidewalks on each side for a total right -of- way of 94 feet. At present the Presbyterian Church has approved street improvement plans for their Spring Road frontage for the wider street section. A comparison of these two street sections is shown in the attached exhibit. With the recently approved narrower street section, the Council may wish to consider whether or not the Spring Road improvements along the Presbyterian Church frontage should be redesigned to the narrower street section. The remaining 24 feet (78 minus 54 feet) would be used for additional landscaping along the Presbyterian Church frontage as the attached conceptual geometric plan indicates. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark. California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 Page -2- If directed by the City Council the City Engineering staff would redesign the Spring Road improvements along the Presbyterian Church frontage. This work would include a redesign of the street improvements, traffic signal and signing and striping plans. The total cost to perform this work is $12,800. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Direct staff to redesign the Spring Road street improvements along the frontage of the Presbyterian Church, striping, and traffic signal designs for the narrower street section at a redesign cost of $12,800. or 2. Direct that the Spring Road improvements, striping, and traffic signal design be constructed as currently planned. Copy: Steve Kueny, City Manager Mark Wessel, City Traffic Engineer Patrick Dobbins, Assistant City Engineer JFK:PMD:sf 30700/0222 IMO364.COU B' 8' 12' /Z' i i !4' /Z' /Z' g' g' u/EsT �/ g�� E ,eQ �.sEr� �31KE s E45T Fz /tiV w LAME ME�l4til CQ1JE �u/ C2 /vc/ 8' STQuvdfry :�EMaj PEP - Ue u T LI9A C o JT-Y/ PL4 7TE A32-9 a SED WEST I5/ r�1KE 3�Cf> BI R/W tic! L4AJE M �Id,V 111NE 54 ` Z ,4, 81 I Cu,e6 S /xl E45T FA6E I ,e1w m ool F/Eo S EG TIOAJ P'$!4 C& O CA iii jz ly It li II 1pi II i ' ROAJ) MOORPARK ITEMI 1 9 0 PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA city Mayor Meeting o °° pK `'to STEVEN KUENY BERNARDO M. PEREZ of 1991 f i City Manager Mayor Pro Tern ° CHERYL J. KANE SCOTT MONTGOMERY Ate' o City Attorney Councilmember PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. ., - ' JOHN E. WOZNIAK Director of =-�z '° ° E _ Community Development Councilmember BY �ar�_ LILLIAN KELLERMAN 2 / JOHN F. KNIPE City Clerk City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE M E M 0 R A N D U M City Treasurer TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Steven Rueny, City Manager DATE: January is, 1991 SUBJECT: Consider Los Angeles Area of Contribution Reimbursement for PD -1064 (TOPA) Pursuant to the Conditions of Approval for PD -1064, TOPA is entitled to reimbursement from the Los Angeles Avenue AOC for 1) Spring Road improvements fronting their project not to exceed their AOC contribution ($26,096) ; and 2) Spring Road Storm Drain. TOPA has received AOC reimbursement for Item No. 1, and $132,494 for a portion of item No. 2. TOPA is now seeking reimbursement for the balance of the storm drain work. The City Engineer recommends additional reimbursement of $32,387 as detailed in his attached December 4, 1990 memorandum to the City Manager. This includes a deduction of $600 to cover costs for review of the reimbursement. TOPA's January 9, 1991 letter requests that in addition tc the reimbursement amount recommended by the City Engineer, that two items be included. The first is $1,475 for a guardrail. The City Engineer has disallowed the cost of the guardrail since it relates to the street improvements. I generally concur with this, however, an argument can be made that it relates to the storm drain. In the interest of fairness, I recommend that TOPA be reimbursed $1,475 for the guardrail. A second point of dispute is the cost of the review for reimbursement. TOPA agreed to pay $600 for this review. There was a misunderstanding on this point since TOPA paid $525.00 when they received $132,493 for the initial storm drain reimbursement. TOPA fees they should not pay for the second review. I agreed with TOPA to cap the review cost at $600 for the storm drain. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, Califomia 93021 (805) 529 -6864 The Honorable City Council January 18, 1991 Page 2 It is recommended that the Los Angeles Avenue AOC reimbursement for the balance of the storm drain be approved at $34,387: $32,387 City Engineer Recommendation 525 Allowance for Cost Review 1,475 Addition of Guardrail $34,387 A related matter is money owed the City by TOPA for certain project processing costs. City records indicate that the following funds are owed: 1. $1,175 Additional Project Planning Review Fees 2. $2,528 Traffic Study Review 3. $3,000 Inspection /Coordination for Traffic Signal (Per 10/4/89 letter) 4. ($1,370) Refund for City Attorney Deposit Total Owed To City: $5,333 • With the exception of the $3,000 for the Traffic Study, TOPA apparently had not been informed of the need to pay the additional fees. Staff recommends retaining $5,333 from the requested AOC reimbursement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Roll Call Vote) 1. Approve Los Angeles Avenue AOC reimbursement to TOPA in the amount of $34,387. 2. Appropriate $34,387 from Los Angeles Avenue AOC for this purpose. 3. Authorize deduction of $5,333 from the aforementioned refund to reimburse City for project processing costs and direct Staff to make the appropriate journal entries. SK:sc 1185.tem MANAGEMENT COMPANY January 9, 1991 Mr. Steven Kueny City Manager City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, Ca. 93021 Re: Gateway Plaza - Storm Drain Reimbursement Dear Steve: Pursuant to our conversation yesterday, please schedule us for the January 23, 1991 City Council meeting. Please advise us when this date is confirmed and forward to us for review a copy of the report which will be presented to Council. We have reviewed the City Engineer's final reimbursement proposal. There are two items which we are not in concurrence with the City Engineer. At this point we see no resolution to these issues and therefore we recommend that we proceed to Council with the City Engineer's recommendation and we will raise the pending issues during the public comment period at the Council meeting. The first item is the guardrail south of A.C. Construction Company's driveway. The City Engineer claims the guardrail was needed because the street was widened. We disagree with this position. The guardrail would not have been necessary if the box culvert was not there (see attached letter from Ramseyer and Associates). Please note that the guardrail is south of our property line and on A.C.'s property. The cost of the guardrail is $1475.00. ffl- FU 05441 � El CITY OF M00RPARK OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER "2C0 AVENGE C= _-E S7A>;S SUITE ,aCC _CS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90067 -4216 (213 203 -9199 Mr. Steven Kueny January 9, 1991 Page Two The second item we feel entitled to reimbursement for is the City Engineer's charges for review of our reimbursement request. This amounts to $1125.00. We were billed $525.00 for their first review and $600.00 for their second review. We do not feel we should be obligated for these fees for several reasons. Firstly, we find the charges excessive and have received no back- up billings to account for hours spent on review. Secondly, we feel that during the entire review, which has dragged on for months, we have been unjustly overscrutinized. We should not have to pay for that. Lastly, and most important, we don't believe that the cost of reimbursement, whatever that may be, should be Topa Is obligation. The purpose of the original condition was that the City wanted Topa to install a continuation of the City's storm drain system adjacent to our property and we would be reimbursed for all of its expense not to exceed $225,000. There has been no disagreement between the City and Topa that costs for plan check and engineering fees for the City Engineer and Ramseyer be reimbursed. Why then are the City Engineer's fees for review of our reimbursement request not reimbursable? Topa was not to incur out -of- pocket expenses as a result of this construction. Already, through the review process we have made concessions we don't agree with just to keep the process going so we can receive our money. We would appreciate your reviewing these issues and would be happy to discuss there with you. However, we do not wish to delay going to Council due to our inability to resolve them. Sincerely, TOPA MANAGEMENT COMPANY Susan K. Weintraub Development Manager cc: Paul R. Gienger John Knipe RA.'tVISEYER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. • <'IVII f :NC iNl:f[I:S LANI) I'1 ANN1:1.ti til1kV1 1'OI.ti December 19, 1990 'Ms. Susan Weintraub Toga i\'lanagcment Conlpany 1SpG f��JCn�!C Of tilt; Stars, Sultc 1400 Los An"Cles, CA 90067 -4216 RE: Guard rail at Reinforce(] Concrete Box (RC) Storm Drain, Spring Road Dear Susan, We recall that the guaRkail south of A.C. Construction company's driveway was required by Willdan before John Knipe would approve the plans. It did not appear as it comment oil the previous plan checks. It was required to protect vehicles front falling into the Channel. The road rises in a southerly direction, while the channel drops, so the flitch is deeper in relation to the road. If the road were widened adjacent to an open field, no guardrail would be necessary. The guardrail is needed for the ditch, not because the road was improved. Very truly yours, 4A, YER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Robert E. ti arrcn, P.L-. registered Civil i ngincer 192M Registered Traffic Engineer 5S WOW W.O. 102 . f I I,' \. ( \I II ( ,I; ":I \ ',tn,)I I I I I III I( )NI ( '�n�) (.; 1 11 )xh • IH I's ) r, 5?, 1N74 BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor SCOTT MONTGOMERY Mayor Pro Tern ELOISE BROWN Councilmember CLINT HARPER, Ph.D. Councilmember PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr. Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MOORPARK MEMORANDUM To: Steve Kueny, City Manager From: John F. Knipe, City Engineer Date: December 4, 1990 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer DEC 06O Subject: PD -1064 (TOPA) ADDITIONAL STORM DRAIN REIMBURSEMENT Condition No. 3C of Exhibit 1 of City Council Resolution No. 89 -535 (see attachment) provided for reimbursement to Topa for construction of a reinforced concrete box along their Spring Road frontage. This reimbursement shall not exceed $225,000. At the January 3, 1990 Council meeting, Topa was reimbursed $132,494 for the construction of this box culvert. The City Engineer's office has reviewed Topa's request for additional reimbursement related to the construction of the Spring Road box culvert and we offer the following: New Requests: C.O. No. 46 - backfill over box culvert to provide final grade for curb and gutter. As discussed in our meeting of October 10, 1990 with Topa, we agree that the equipment mobilization ($1,500) and the backfill over the box culvert ($3,340) should be reimbursed but that the grading for the curb and gutter is a street improvement item that should have been included in the Spring Road street widening reimbursement request. Therefore, the reimbursement for this item (including 6 percent for overhead and profit and 1 percent for liability insurance) equals $5,182. C.O. No. 56 - raise water meter. As previously acknowledged in our October 4, 1990 letter to Topa, we agree that this item should be reimbursed in the amount of $789. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 Page 2 C.O. No. 64 - reconstruction of AC Construction driveway. As discussed in our October 10, 1990 meeting with Topa, we agree that this construction cost is reasonable and should be reimbursed in the amount of $13,884. C.O. No. 65 - construction of retaining wall, surveying and miscellaneous driveway construction regarding the AC Construction driveway. As discussed in our October 10, 1990 meeting with Topa, we agree that this construction cost is reasonable and should be reimbursed in the amount of $7,168. Fence (Guardrail) This guardrail is shown on the Spring Road street improvement plans as originally approved and our Construction Observer, Ron Wilson, has indicated that no field memo requesting installation of this guardrail was issued. Therefore we must disallow this item. Citv Engineer's Fee This fee was for City review of the previous box culvert reimbursement request. Therefore this fee is not reimbursable. Previously Submitted Request, Soils Ins ections This item can not be reimbursed since the City is not responsible for overtime inspection or reinspection due to rain. Dewatennn Due to the continuous dewatering operations necessitated by nuisance water run -off, this item should be reimbursed in the amount of $2,500. Move and Repair Waterline We agree that this item shall be reimbursed in the amount of $221. Trucking and Dum ing Fees We agree that this item should be reimbursed in the amount of $2,511. Page 3 The following is a summary of the additional storm drain reimbursement: New Requests 1. C.O. No. 46 $ 5,182 2. C.O. No. 56 789 3. C.O. No. 64 13,884 4. C.O. No. 65 7,168 5. Fence (Guardrail) 0 6. City Engineer Fee 0 Subtotal of New Requests $27,023 $27,023 Previously Submitted Requests 7. Soils Inspection $ 0 8. Dewatering 2,500 9. Move and Repair Waterline 221 10. Truck and Dumping Fees 2,511 Subtotal $ 5,232 General Conditions (7 %) 366 Contractor's Fee (6 %) 314 Insurance (1%) 52 Subtotal of Previously Submitted Requests $5,964 $ 5,964 City Engineer Review of Reimbursement Request ($ 600) TOTAL ADDITIONAL REIMBURSEMENT $32,387 copy: Patrick Dobbins, Assistant City Engineer JFK:PMD:ts 01880/3003 01070/3002 FM0413.LTR r 9 RESOLUTI N NC. 39 -535 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MCORPAR14 CALIFORNIA, MENDING RESOLUTION NO. 38 -443 FOR THE PURPOSE OF CLARIFYING CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PO -1064 JOPy). WHEREAS, on January 20, 1988, the City Council of the City of Moorpark adopted Resolution No. 38 -443 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE NCCRPA.R.T CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPA X, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1064 FILED BY TOPA MANAGEMENT PARTNERSHIP FOR THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND SPRING ROAD. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide clarification to various conditions of Resolution No. 88 -433. WHEREAS, at a regularly scheduled meeting on November 2, 1988 the City Council of said City as an agenda item discussed theses clarifications. WHEREAS, the clarifications do not constitute a :modification of an approved project. WHEREAS, the City Council has been duly informed in the matter; has given careful consideration thereto; has determined that the condition clarifications requested do not necessitate the preparation of a subsequent environmental document because Ae clarifications contained therein will not result in new s- Cn,:1cant envlronmenzai _: pac is . NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL Or THE CITY OF MCORPARY, CALIFORNIA DOES PESOLV F AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That z ^e clarifications to -carious condition of Reseluz_en Nc. 33 �iescr_bed =,...._b__ 1 (attacted) are hereby approved. SECTION 2. That in all other respects, Resolution NO. 88-433 shall remain in full force and effew. SECTION 3. That this resolution shall make effect immediately. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall cer`ify to the passage and adcption or this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED th s t� day of = ,truar v 19 39 Eloise Srown�, Mayor ATTEST: Richard hare, City Clerk (Seal) J PD 106' (Toca) Condition Cja~ ;catsor.s 1. PD 106: Cizy Engineer Condition ,To. 3C - RC3 PJox Construction "Prior to occupancv, an approximately 4 root high by o foot wide reinforced concrete box will oe constructed along the east property line. The location and design of the RCB will be rev;ewed and approved by the Ventura Countv Mood Control District and the City Engineer. This reinforced concrete box will connect t- the existing 3 feet high by 5 feet 8 inch wide RCB crossing under Los Angeles avenue. The new RCB.will provide a stub -out where it -meets the existing RCB for a fut•_,re 54 inch reinforced concrete pipe entering from the east. The developer will enter - �-nta- a�- �gyoo,.oA�_y�`� the __cyt1 - -of --It - -ta be - reimbursed for the construction or this reinforced concrete box f ro-La the Los Angeles area of Contribution Fund �ub�ee =- =e- reviey a;�d_appreYal- by-= AO -Eity upon acceptance of the work and costs by the City Council The total reim.bursement shall not exceed $225,000. If the ACC does not have sufficient unencumbered funds to reimburse the entire amount upon acceptance by the City Council, the next funds coning into the ACC will be reimbursed to the developer until the reimbursement of $225,000 is completed. Reimbursement costs shall include engineering, construction, inspection, plan check, and permit fees. all reimbursabla costs must be substantiated by Topa. --he final decision on the amount of reimbursement Council." hall be made by the City ?D. , 06� C J Engineer C- , ._on ';o. Ya - ;:ems C ond_�_c n "Any direct expenses incur_ =d by -: e developer -ela` to the construction Of pave ment - - - -- sidewalk or - - - curb, gutter, - -(9, t Oi v`. �1'_S� :On On -he north lec and traf__C lecS, O _.-O he ^Cr - d c�, e 's Avenue/S: r; ng 7aJ ! ' ntersect -on srl '_e d - developer of t'e p ro P e:: located at the nort`:eas ` corner of said - ntersec-._on. _' e C4 J� an agree t _ ` air_ enter _n _o Wer �'_j the ce e�oper o� PD -1064, agree_. tO condi t_On the fu�ure de•je_ ce- Of the a property - �e sort least corner of a; rsection rei. nurse~ :e developer of PD-1064 l le .J n ~Orce ble. a a1 1 Day all .?^ 1 - 1 ]:.cllldin uC 111cC _:...__ _4 r0+, atzOr. ^.a_� OS� a c J J _.. _ •� the C _ - -., _ o uC j and /or e ^. _ }� � _.._ _ _orce sa `7 The aQreemen w. l prepared by e C, v _ 07 e 1 _subject to r�v�ew b•� �.._ oiler• ..- - >> 1 7a J the C= h - Tenses 3. PD 1064 C - --j E. ._near or.�_�_o > +o. _d - Los es Avenue .0 Ange_ The developer shall dews T t with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the L-os Angeles avenue improvement Area of Contribution. to actual deposit shall be one then current Los Angeles Avenue improvement Area of Contribution applicabie race at =he tine the Building Permit is issued. The applicant shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for costs associated with widening Spring Road from New Los Angeles Avenue south. Such costs include construction, engineering, plan checking, inspection and permit fees. Documentation of actual costs for the improvement of Spring Road along the frontage of the property must be provided by the applicant to the City Engineer for review and approval. The total reimbursement shall not exceed Topa's total ACC contribution amount. All reimbursable costs must be substantiated by Topa. The final decision on the amount of reimbursement shall be made by the City Council. 4. PD 1064 City Council Condition No. lg - Utility Undergrounding Prior to occupancy, the utility poles located on Spring Road, one each at the northeast and south east corner of the site shall be removed and power underground to the nearest off site utility pole. The existing street light on the Los Angeles Avenue frontage shall be removed, and replaced if required by the City Engineer with an appropriate light standard. CL: is `N 30560 CMO! l04 . RSO BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor SCOTT MONTGOMERY Mayor Pro Tern ELOISE BROWN Councilmember CLINT HARPER, Ph.D. Councilmember PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr. Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MOORPARK "OORPARK, CALIFORNIA CRY C Meebrp of -44z- 199 BY MEMORANDUM T ITEM I I • F. STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Philip E. Newhouse, Dir. of Community Services DATE: January 18, 1991 0,1\ SUBJECT: Consider Soccer Fields at Arroyo Vista Community Park At your meeting of January 9, 1991, Council requested this item be placed on the agenda for discussion. BACKGROUND: Currently, Arroyo Vista Community Park is leased to Fedelety Corporation for agricultural production of vegetables. The current term of the lease was set for two years; January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1991. Additionally, the lease shall automatically renew not more than three (3) times, for three (3) successive terms of one (1) year each. Paragraph 39 of the lease, "Right to Terminate Lease 'in Whole or in Part," grants to the City the right to terminate the lease and retake possession of the entire premises, or any portion thereof, at any time after the original term of the original lease, which expires December 31, 1991. Additionally, the City is further granted the right to partially terminate the lease and retake Possession of approximately ten (10) acres running along the western boundary of the premises as depicted in Exhibit "A" attached "All any time during the original term of the lease. City shall exercise these rights by providing tenant with written notice of such termination at least six months prior to the date of any such retaking. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. PEN:db Attachments 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 f �r LEASE AGREEMENT ARROYO VISTA COMMUNITY PARK PARCELS 506 -01 -28 and 506 -01 -64 JANUARY 1990 i� LEASE' AGRF_E:'LNT PARCELS 560 -01 -28 and 506 -01 -64 THIS LEASE AGREE:,I_NT, (hereinafter "Lease ") is made and entered into as of this lst day of January, 1990, by and between, the CITY OF MCORPARX, (hereinafter "City, ") and FEDELETY CORPORATION, a California corporation, (hereinafter "Tenant "). The parties agree that: 1. PROPERTY LEASED. City, in consideration of the rents and payments herein agreed to be paid, and of the indemnifications, covenants, and agreements agreed to herein, hereby leases to Tenant, and Tenant hereby leases from City, those certain parcels of real property described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, together with any and all improvements thereon (all of which are hereinafter referred to as the "Premises "). 2. TERM. The original term of this Lease shall be for two years, commencing January 1, 1990 and ending December 31, 1991, provided however, that City's obligations hereunder shall be contingent upon Tenant's execution of a quitclaim deed and payment, in full, of all of the obligations set forth at Paragraph 5(A) of this Lease, and Tenant's furnishing City with certificates of the insurance specified in Paragraph 10 of this Lease. 3. AUTOMATIC RENEWALS. Provided this Lease has not been terminates, and provided further that Tenant shall not be in default of any provision of this Lease, this L shall automatically ase cally renew, not more than three (3) times, for three (3) successive terms of one (1) year each. Eac^ one (1) year renewal tern shall be an independent renewal of this Lease and shall be subject to the rental adjustments set forth at Paragraph 6 or this Lease, and all other provisions of this Lease. 4. HOLDING OyER. Should Tenant retain possession of the Premises beyond ;.he original term of this Lease or any renewal hereof, or after the effective date of any notice of termination of this Lease, without the express consent of City, Tenan: shall automatically become a Tenant from month to month during such hold -over period. Tenant shall be subject to all of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease, including the obligation to pay rent on a pro rata basis during any such hold -over period. l T / "d? /AC-R0890a Z !04/03%90) A. All payments and notices to Tenant seal: be given or mailed to: Fedele *_y Corporation P. 0. Box 11 Tarzana, California 91356 B. All payments and notices to City shall_ be given or mailed to: City of Moorzar{ City `.anacer 799 .Moorpark Avenue Mooruart, CA 93021 _ Notice shall be deemed given upon receipt by personal delivery or upon the third (3rd) day after deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered, return rece_ot requested, with postage prepaid. ` 35. PARTIAL --NVAL =DITY. if any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Lease is found,by a Court of competent ;urisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of this Lease shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect to the full extent allowed by law. 36. PARAGRAPH HEADINGS. Paragraph headings in this Lease are for convenience only and are not intended to be used in interpreting or construing the terms, covenants and conditions or this Lease. 37. MODIFICATION. This Lease constitutes the entire agreement or the parties concerning the subject matter hereof and all prior agreements and understandings, oral or written, are hereby_ merged herein. This Lease may not be modified or amended except in a writing signed by all of the parties hereto. 38. INTERPRE'T'ATION. Should interpretation of this Lease, or any portion thereof, be necessary, it is deemed that this Lease was prepared by the parties jointly and equally, and shay_ not be interpreted against either party on the ground that the party prepared the Lease or caused it to be prepared. 39. PIGrT TO TERMINATE LEASE IN WHOLE OR IN PART. Tenant hereby grants to City, and City hereby accepts and reserves the right to terminate this Lease and retake possession of the entire Premises, or any portion thereof, at any time after the original term of this Lease. Tenant further grants to City, and City hereby reserves the right to :artially terminate this Lease and retake possession of approximately 10 acres running along -_0- R45196 the western boundry of the premises as depicted at Exhibit "B" attached hereto, at any time during he original term of this Lease. City shall exercise these rights by providing tenant with written notice of such termination at least six months prior to the date of any such retaking. In the eert City shall retake only a portion of the premises, rentals v shall be abated on a per acres basis, any fractional component rounded upward to the next acre. 40. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL. During the term of this Lease as set forth in Paragraph 2 hereof and during the terms of the first and second automatic renewals of one (1) year each as set forth in Paragraph 3 hereof, and provided that Tenant shall not be in default of any provision of this Lease, Tenant shall have the right of first refusal to meet the terms and conditions of any bona Fide offer to lease the Premises upon the expiration of the term for the identical use for which Tenant or its subtenant was using the Premises on March 21, 1990; to wit, the farming of row crops. City shall give Tenant written notice of the bona fide offer and such notice shall include the terms ;ind conditions of such offer in the form of a written lease agreement (the "Offered Lease "). Tenant shall have twenty (20) days from the date of receiving the written notice and Offered Lease within which to exercise the right of first refusal by returning a fully executed copy of the Offered Lease to the City and by performing all conditions precedent to the obligations of City thereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Lease Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date first written above. -11- C C - MOORPA Paul W. awrason, Jr.,1Maycr ATTEST: Lillian City of St M Kellerman, City Clerk Moorpark a 'n b h 0 x c, rt F-' O a n N rkx RANCHO SIMI PORTION TRACT M s c c— usvcso �7o7/N i /r �J77/�N i � w 94-14L- P w�es� t O SBE W8 :r6 15 ,5%— a. 3oac. �� 7i77Y (9 2 740.4c P 36 RS 73 • 3844Ar- 05 T(, y r� y n � 1 S� f t O (06) (07 ) yJ N PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M:PEREZ Mayor Pro Tern SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councilmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk MOORPARK 'ORPAIX CAUFORNtA Clay C AA"Wo :�t Z 199y ACTION : e MA M E M O R A N D U M ITEM/ I- G. STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works IM DATE: January 16, 1991 (Council Meeting 1- 23 -91) SUBJECT: Parking Adjacent to Mountain Meadow Elementary School This presents a discussion of parking and loading problems on Mountain Meadow Drive in the vicinity of Mountain Meadow Elementary School. DTSCUSSTON A. BaC gi=grld i• Neiahborhood D crr,: The Specific Plan for Mountain Meadows provides for a system of collector streets throughout the area. The plan also calls for the establishment of a system of Class II Bike Lanes on these collector streets. In that a Class II Bike Lane requires the installation of signs and street markings designating specific lanes for bicycles, a resolution [Exhibit ij was adopted establishing "NO PARKING" zones on both sides of all of those collector streets, to allow for Bike Lanes to be placed next to the curb. One such NO PARKING zone and Bike Lane is in place on that portion of Mountain Meadow Drive in front of Mountain Meadow Elementary School. 2. Bchoo� D cirr,,; The site design for Mountain Meadow' Elementary School presently does not adequately accommodate the activities and needs at that school. Site deficiencies include: 1) the placement of temporary classrooms; 2) insufficient on -site parking to accommodate teachers, non - teaching staff, parent volunteers, and visiting parents; 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 City Council Parking at Mt. Meadow School Page 2 and, 3 ) inadequate on -site parking and loading facilities for the parents of students. The recent increase in student enrollment has aggravated these problems. 3. Parking Problem: The inadequate on -site facilities for the parking and /or loading of parents' cars has caused parents to park at the curbside on both sides of the street in front of the school. As discussed above, this street is designated NO PARKING to accommodate the Bike Lane. The Parents who are waiting to pick up their children, are parking (or stopping) in the Bike Lane in a NO PARKING zone. .W EVV -. It is apparent that some kind of action is necessary to deal with the conflict between parked cars and the Bike Lanes. Alternative courses of action would include: 1. Action (by the School District) to construct a major modification of the School site to allow the School to accommodate all of the School related activities on -site. 2. Action to change the NO PARKING designation to a NO STOPPING zone and the commencement of an aggressive parking enforcement program; 3. Action to eliminate the Bike Lanes in order to allow for the designation of on- street parking and /or Loading Zones. Note: As discussed above, this Class II Bike Lane is consistent with the Mountain Meadows Specific Plan. Any change would require an amendment (Zone Change) to the Specific Plan. 4. Action to modify the street striping to accommodate both on- street parking and a Class II Bike Lane in each direction. C. Meetings Representatives of the Police Department have met with School District staff to discuss this and related problems at the School site. In addition, the Director of Public Works has met with the School Principal and District representatives to' discuss a possible resolution of the parking /loading problem. The preferred view expressed at these meetings generally supports Alternate #4 above. City Council Parking at Mt. Meadow School Page 3 D. Re- striping Plan Alternative #4 has been studied by staff, including the City Traffic Engineer. It is the opinion of staff that the street could be re- striped to accommodate both a parking /loading lane and a Bike Lane. The attached sketch [Exhibit 2] generally depicts this stripping concept. A plan for this concept has not yet been developed or reviewed by the Traffic Engineer. At this point it is a concept_ only which is thought to be a feasible solution to the problem. E. Parking -& Loading Zones The moving of the centerline to the west [see Exhibit 2] would allow for the establishment of a parking / loading zones on the east side of the street. A preliminary layout of these provisions /restrictions is shown on Exhibit 3. Some of the details of this plan is discussed as follows: 1. NO STOPPING -- The west side of the street will be posted NO STOPPING to discourage pedestrians crossing the street at mid - block. The southerly two hundred feet ± (200' ±) of the east side of the street will also be posted NO STOPPING in order to allow adequate room for the transition of the Bike Lane. 2. LOADING ZONE -- A passenger loading zone will be provided in that area between the most southerly bus driveway and the driveway serving the Park parking lot. This length of curb would accommodate approximately fifteen (15) cart. Pedestrian safety will be enhanced by painting the curbs RED five feet (51) on each side of the School driveways. This will allow for improved visibility and a better turning radius for buses. Pedestrian safety will also be enhanced by School's practice of providing a crossing guard for that portion of the sidewalk which crosses the school parking lot driveway. 3. RESTRICTED PARKING ZONE -- Vehicular parking provided from the Park parking lot northerly to a point l just south of Mountain Trail Court. This length of curb would accommodate approximately sixteen (16) cars. This additional parking will reduce the need for cars to park on side streets in adjacent residential neighborhoods. City Council Parking at Mt. Meadow School Page 4 E3. RESTRICTED PARKING ZONE (cont) It is proposed that overnight parking be prohibited in this area by designating all parking areas NO PARKING between the hours of 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. Note: If the hours of the LOADING ZONE described above were restricted to 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on School Days, this portion of curb could also be utilized for parking for evening school events and for weekend use. F. Scone of Work The scope of work for this project would include: 1) preparation, review and approval of a design; 2) removal of existing striping and pavement markers; 3) installation of new striping and pavement markers; 4) painting of curbs (where required); 5) installation of new regulatory signs where required; and, 6) expenditure of staff time related to the preparation of the enacting resolution, administration of the stripping contract, procurement of necessary signs and related materials and field support as required. G. Fiscal Impact It is anticipated that the above described project would cost between $5,000 and $7,000. City costs for this work would be charged to Fund 02 Traffic Safety. H. Cost Sharing Due to the nature and source of this parking problem, it would appear that the cost of the proposed solution should be shared by the School District. This concept was discussed by and between City staff and School District staff. It was suggested that the School District consider sharing in the cost of the project by contributing fifty per cent of said costs, Not To Exceed $2,500.00. The District indicated that this approach was acceptable. RECOMMENDATION Direct staff to: prepare a Resolution to amend parking restriction on the subject street segment, request written confirmation of the School District's intent to participate in the project costs (Not to Exceed $2,500) and take other necessary steps to implement this project. Ex w % t3%-t i RESOLUTION No. 87 - 399 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING ANY TIME" ZONES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS AND A "NO PARKING 6 :00 A.M. TO 6 :00 P.M." ZONE WITHIN MOUNTAIN MEADOWS (PC -3). WHEREAS, Section 21351 of the California Vehicle Code authorizes the City to place and maintain or cause to be placed and maintained, such appropriate signs, signals or other traffic control devices as may be necessary properly to indicate and carry out the provisions of the vehicle code or local traffic ordinances or to warn or guide traffic; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of. Moorpark, California, does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. That "NO PARKING ANY TIME" zones are hereby established on both sides of Mountain Meadow Drive and Walnut Creek Road for their entire length within the Mountain Meadow development (PC- 3)(refer to Exhibit "A"). SECTION 2. That a "NO PARKING ANY TIME" zone is hereby established on both sides of Mountain Trail Street for its entire length except for that portion east of Walnut Creek Road. SECTION 3. That a "NO PARKING 6 :00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M." zone is hereby established on Mountain Trail Street east of its intersection with Walnut Creek Road for a distance of 400 feet from the intersection on the south side and 250 feet from the intersection on the north side. SECTION 4. That-Urban West Communities is hereby directed to install the appropriate signs and markings for the locations herein above identified. SECTION 5. That the City Manager is hereby directed to provide for the maintenance of the appropriate signs and markings for the locations herein above identified. PASSED, AND ADOPTED this lst day of July, 1987. Mayor, City of Moorpark, California —-11 J WALNUT CREEK ROAD MOUNTAIN MEADOW DRIVE - MOUNTAIN TRAIL STREET -. s , Ex L .................. ............. FOUR -WAY STOP' SIGN LOCATION EXHIBIT "A" tip 5� F -wA6\7 Z Mw4\W\v\ `Mez)dy w D v*\ e _ 'R2.V1Sc�� s ea 40, . . Z s v? , — lzI cis E nn� �a �1KE ��1�1'E L1R1E �� LINL BIrE LAt�� U Wt �k �J J J y €x��k ?A-T lam' NO S TOPPIN G �ASSf.�G�- LOA�JiuG � PARKING 0� J