Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 1994 0316 RDA REGREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MARCH 16, 1994 7:00 P.M. Moorpark Community Center 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: 3. PUBLIC COMMENT: 4. CONSENT: Next Res. 94 -26 799 Moorpark Avenue A. Consider Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of March 2, 1994. Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as processed. 5. ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Establishment of Prioritv List for Public Works Projects. Staff Recommendation: The Project Area Advisory Committee recommends that the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency receive for consideration the attached Priority List. Further, if the Agency is in concurrence with the Priority List as presented that the Priority List be adopted for reference when considering approval of and funding for future Public Works Projects. 6. CLOSED SESSION: A. Negotiations for Real Property at 675 Moorpark Avenue (Moss) and 661 Moorpark Avenue (Aikens) pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. B. Negotiations for Real Property at 18 High Street (Abbott & Assoc., Moorpark Chamber of Commerce, Moorpark Melodrama) pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. C. Negotiations for Real Property on the North Side of Los Angeles Avenue and South Side of Poindexter Avenue contiguous to Mission Bell Plaza. 7. ADJOURNMENT: Any member of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency during the Public Comments portion of the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or Discussion /Action item. Speakers who wish to address the Redevelopment Agency concerning a Public Hearing or Discussion /Action item must do so during the Public Hearing or Discussion /Action portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker Cards must be received by the Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency prior to the Call to Order of the meeting. Speakers will be heard in the order that their Speaker Cards are received. A limitation of 3 minutes shall be imposed upon each speaker. PONVOLOPMMAMM AiC�laMc W. TO: FROM: DATE: AGENDA REPORT MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The Chairman and Members of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Project Area Advisory Committee February 17, 1994 (MRA Meeting of 03- 02 -94) SUBJECT: Establishment of Priority List for Public Works Projects BACKGROUND: '`( ESTA9l.1�0 * [ YMON 1� 11t1 OF The first assignment given to the Project Area Advisory Committee (the "Committee ") was the establishment of a priority list for all Public Works Projects for the City. The Committee has held several meetings in order to discuss and evaluate the various projects. The Committee also took a tour of the City which was conducted by Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works in order to receive his comments on the various projects which helped to establish which Public Works Projects, in the Committee's collective opinion, should be considered high priority projects. DISCUSSION: The Committee has established a Priority List of all Public Works Projects for consideration by the City Council /Redevelopment Agency. The Committee was directed that they should not consider the costs of a project but rather the importance of the project when determining ranking. The Committee, in evaluating the various projects, took into consideration which projects would eliminate blight found in the community, and which projects would have a major positive impact on various neighborhoods. The Committee has selected three basic classifications or categories in their listing which are: (1) Exhibit "A" - High Priority, (2) Exhibit "B" - Should Not Be Considered At This Time, and (3) Exhibit "C" - Projects That Are Considered Completed Or Underway. Exhibit "D" shows a compilation of all projects considered. The Committee would like to convey to the Council /Agency that the consensus was that the projects with a High Priority are very important to our community and should be expedited. RECOMMENDATION: The Project,Area Advisory Committee recommends that the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency receive, for-consideration the attached Priority List. Further, if the Agency is in concurrence with the Priority List as presented that the Priority List be adopted for reference when considering approval of and funding for future Public Works Projects. cc: Steven Kueny, City Manager Richard Hare, Deputy City Manager Steven Hayes, Redevelopment Manager MRA /SGH94020/AG W 02/17/04 EXHIBFI "A' PROJECT AREA AI)VISORI COMMITTEE PUBLIC WORKS PROJI-CTS I.IS 'I' HIGH PRIORI FN PR()JE(' I'S Estimated Priority Project No. Description-__ (�l Staff Remarks 1. 14. First Street ;0u,(0) Project in design. To include Reconstruction reconstruction of curb, gutter and sidewalk. Design to consider surface drainage improvements. 1. 21. Bard Street 201),u00 Project being designed in Reconstruction from Third conjunction with First Street Street to RR. Project. 2a. 27a. Spring Road Parkway Landscaping: High Street to New Los Angeles 2b. 27b. Spring Road Median Strip with landscaping 2c. 27c. Spring Road entrance enhancements and treatments with out signaqe or lettering 3. 31. Street lighting L.A. Ave. (Nogales; 4. 42. Block wall separating the back sides of the homes in Virginia Colony from E. Los Angeles 5. 32. Walnut Street - High 100,()0(. Complete reconstruction of the Street to Charles street including new curbs, gutters and sidewalks. Pavement with to be with sixty -three (63') wide to accommodate angle parking Project List Page 2 PUBA -5B Staff Remarks To residential tracts in the downtown area Lstimated Priority Project No. Description ost s$J 5. 35. Everett Street - Moorpark to Magnolia. Reconstruction of the street to include new curbs, gutters and sidewalks 5. 37. Magnolia - Charles to Everett. Reconstruction of the street to include new curbs, gutters and sidewalks. 5. 40. Magnolia and Bard - Charles to High. Reconstruction of the street including curbs, gutters and sidewalks 5. 41. Bard - Charles to High. Reconstruction of the street including curbs, gutters and sidewalks 6. 13. Miscellaneous Entry Statements Virginia Colony, Millard and L.A. and Avenida and Condor 7. 16. Poindexter Street 3uU,000 Construction 8. 45. Street lights and lights in alley ways between Moorpark Ave. Spring Road north of Los Angeles. 9. 44. South end of Mc Fadden and Corinett. The Committee would like to express their unanimous support for bicycle ways and lanes throughout the City. Whenever or wherever street projects are considered the inclusion of bicycle ways should be contemplated. PUBA -5B Staff Remarks To residential tracts in the downtown area No. 1. 4. 5. 6 7, 8. 9. 10 11. 12. EXHIBI "I "B" PROJECT AREA ADVISORY" COMMI'TTE?I; PUBLIC WORKS PROM CTS HS"I PROJEC'T'S THAT ARE NOT RH'0MMF.NDED AT THIS TIMI Description Storm Drain Study Spring Road North: Extension of Spring Rd from Charles Street to Walnut Canyon Road or Broadway (an exact alignment has been determined and an unnamed alternative might be a road extension to Broadway, west of the Campus Park Area Railroad Grade Separation ilocation is undetermined) Los Angeles Avenue [East,: Widening from High Street to South Condor Drive Misc. Traffic Signal Improvements Misc. Storm Drainage Improvements Moorpark Avenue (State Highway 23) adjacent to railroad property approximately 800 feet of frontage including curb, gutter, sidewalk and street page out Gabbert Road: Widening and reconstruction of existing roadways Miscellaneous other street, curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements High Street / Moorpark Avenue Streetscape Improvements: Landscaping, lighting, entry statements and related improvements for the existing downtown area Estimate Cost Staff Remarks 20,01111 Master Drainage Study is being prepared. 5, 000, 0!,. 5,00u,1 1 4,500,u1111 Project in design. Partially Caltrans funded. Design and construction may be coordinated with highway relinquishment project by Caltrans. 2,000,0 to 5, 001.),l ii I 10i1,11,1,i 500,000 $5, 000, Oil) 3,000,�� +��.� Project List Page 2 No. Description 15. Moorpark Avenue Storm Drain 17. High Street West of Moorpark Avenue Reconstruction 18. Casey Road Reconstruction 20. Spring Road Widening: Charles Street south 22. Miscellaneous Street Reconstruction: Streets North of Charles Street 23. Goldman Street Overlay 24. Alley Reconstruction: Between First and Los Angeles Avenue 25. Traffic signal at Flinn, Spring, and Second Street 26. Maureen Lane South of Los Angeles Avenue Storm Drain And Overlay- 30. Bicycle ways 33. Walnut Street - Charles to Everett. 36. Valley Road. Reconstruction of the street within the existing forty feet wide right -of -way. Recommended that this item be combined with item 41. 38. Flory Street. Asphalt overlay or reconstruction. 39. Flinn Avenue. Reconstruction of the street. PUBA -5C Estimated Cost__1`; Staff Remarks 1,450,0(i; Project in design. To include storm drain laterals to Flory Street and to the MetroLink Parking lot. Also to include curb, gutter and sidewalk on the east side of the street between 2nd Street and 3rd I�treet 400,im+ 300 , N i, 100,rn', 400,0;ai 10O,( i 600, -,, scope of work to be determined by design effort. final scope of work to be determined by lesign analysis. E XHIBVI ' PROJE( °I' AREA ADVISo)RY COMMI "rTE::F, PUBLIC WORKS PROJ11 "1 s LIST PROJECTS THAI' ARI.", CONSIDERED '\S UNDERWAY OR COMPLETED No. Description 1. Storn Drain Study 2. High Street Improvements 3. High Street Park 19. Charles Street Reconstruction 28. Avenida Colonia 29. McFadden & Cornett Sidewalks 34. Spring Road Storm Drain. Construction of a storm drain from McDonald's northerly to Flinn Avenue. 43. Third street improvements. PUBA -5D Estimated Cost_(- Staff Remarks 20,01)l Master Drainage Study is being prepared. 2l n complete (ompleted Requires right -of -way Project in design. No. Description 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 11. 12. EXHIBI 'I "D' PROJECT AREA ADVISORY COMMITTEE Pl1BLA' WORKS PROJI "CJS LIST PROJECTS THAI WFRF ('ONSIDERED Storm Drain Study High Street Improvements High Street Park Estimated _. cost._s'; Staff Remarks Spring Road North: Extension of Spring Rd from Charles Street to Walnut Canyon Road or Broadway (an exact alignment has been determined and an unnamed alternative might be a road extension to Broadway, west of the Campus Park Area Railroad Grade Separation (location is undetermined) Los Angeles Avenue (East: Widening from High Street to South Condor Drive Misc. Traffic Signal Improvements Misc. Storm Drainage Improvements Moorpark Avenue (State Highway 23) adjacent to railroad property approximately 800 feet of frontage including curb, gutter, sidewalk and street pave out Gabbert Road: Widening and reconstruction of existing roadways Miscellaneous other street, curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements High Street Moorpark Avenue Streetscape Improvements: Landscaping, lighting, entry statements and related improvements for the existing downtown area 20,, it 20,i 0 li;,'•1 5, 000,x. q 5,000,;;i;n Master Drainage Study is being prepared. 4,500,o1O Project in design. Partially Caltrans tunded. Design and construction may be -oordinated with highway relinquishment project by Caltrans. 2,000,1;un 5,000,11;,0 300.::11() 600, u $5,000, IIC 3,000, i10 Project List Page 2 No. Description 13. Miscellaneous Entry Statements Vergina Colony, Millard and L.A. and Avenida and Condor 14. First Street Reconstruction 15. Moorpark Avenue Storm Drain 16. Poindexter Street Construction 17. High Street West of Moorpark ..venue reconstruction of Reconstruction 18. Casey Road Reconstruction 19. Charles Street Reconstruction 20. Spring Road Widening: Charles Street 1,450,0!10 south 21. Bard Street Reconstruction From Third laterals to Flory Street to RR 22. Miscellaneous Street Reconstruction: lot. Also to include Streets North of Charles Street 23. Goldman Street Overlay 24. Alley Reconstruction: Between First *reet and Los Angeles Avenue 25. Traffic signal at Flinn, Spring, and Second Street 26. Maureen Lane South of Los Angeles Avenue Storm Drain And Overlay 27 a. Spring Road Parkway Landscaping: High Street to New Los Angeles. 27 b. Spring Road Median Strip with Landscaping. 27 C. Spring Road Entrance Enhancements and Treatments with out signaqe or lettering. Estimate) Cost (L) Staff Remarks Io residential tracts in the downtown area 300,011u Project in design. To include reconstruction of curb, gutter and sidewalk. Design to consider surface drainage Improvements. 1,450,0!10 Project in design. To include storm drain laterals to Flory Street and to the MetroLink Parking lot. Also to include ,•urb, gutter and sidewalk on the east side ,�r the street between 2nd Street and 3rd *reet 30(1 ,(1':,) 400,o-t , 30u, r.1 40U,IilI) complete 10u,lol i 200,1.1110 project being designed in conjunction with First street project. 400,1 iOu, (it I;) 600,0t;' Project List Page 3 Estimated No_ Description _ cost .1 Staff Remarks 28. Avenida Colonia completed 29. McFadden & Cornett Sidewalks Requires right -of -way 30. Bicycle ways 31. Street lighting L.A. Ave (Nogales) 32. Walnut Street - High Street to ].00,ii11) Complete reconstruction of the street Charles including new curbs, gutters and sidewalks. Pavement width to be with sixty -three feet n3') wide to accommodate angle parking. 33. Walnut Street - Charles to Everett. Scope of work to be determined by design effort. 34. Spring Road Storm Drain. Project in design. Construction of a storm drain from McDonald's northerly to Flinn Avenue. 35. Everett Street - Moorpark to Magnolia. Reconstruction of the street to include new curbs, gutters and sidewalks. 36. Valley Road. Reconstruction of the street within the existing forty feet wide right -of -way. Recommended that this item be combined with item 41. 37. Magnolia - Charles to Everett. Reconstruction of the street to include new curbs, gutters and sidewalks. 38. Flory Street. Asphalt overla; or final scope of work to be determined by reconstruction. design analysis. 39. Flinn Avenue. Reconstruction of the street. 40 Magnolia and Bard - Charles to High. Reconstruction of the street including curbs, gutters and sidewalks. 41. Bard - Charles to High. Reconstruction of the street including curbs, gutters and sidewalks. Project List Page 4 Estimated No. Description _. Cost ill Staff Remarks 42. Block wall separating the back sides of the hoees in Virginia Colony from the traffic along E. Los Angeles. 43. Third street improvements. 44. South end of Mc Fadden and Corinett. 45. Street lights and lights in alley ways between Moorpark Ave. Spring Road north of Los Angeles. PUBA -5A AGENDA REPORT MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO: Chairman and Members of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency FROM: Steven G. Hayes, Economic Development Manager DATE: March 4, 1994 (MRA Meeting of 06/16/94) SUBJECT: Staff Analysis and Comments on Project Area Advisory Committee's Priority List for Public Improvement Projects BACKGROUND: On October 20, 1993, the City Council of the City of Moorpark appointed members of the community to site on the newly form Project Area Advisory Committee (PAAC). The PAAC, on December 14, 1993 held their first meeting with the City Council's Budget and Finance Committee. Also in attendance was the Executive Director of the Agency and the Redevelopment Manager. At that meeting the PAAC was given the task of reviewing and assigning priorities to the wide variety of public works projects. The PAAC was instructed that in their review of the various projects that they should not consider the amount of cost of a project or the funding source. The intent of their assignment was to have the PAAC make a recommendation as to a Public Works Project Priority List. Staff was and still is unable to estimate the cost of many of the projects presented to the PAAC as these projects have not been designed. Without the required design work being accomplished there is insufficient information to determine the full scope of a project and the associated cost for construction. At their second meeting, the Executive Director of the Agency reviewed and discussed questions from the PAAC about the information given to them. The list of projects given to PAAC was a compilation of projects taken from the 1993 Tax Allocation Bond Documents, the Redevelopment Plan for the Moorpark Redevelopment Project, and a list of other Public Works Projects compiled by the Public: Works Department. The PAAC has now held several additional meetings in order to discuss, review and study the various projects. In an effort to further understand individual projects the PAAC conducted a tour of the City with the Public Works Director who showed them the sites of the various projects. Also at the PAAC's first meeting Agency staff gave a general overview of the availability of funds from the 1993 Tax Allocation Bond Issue (see Staff Exhibit "I "). It was stated to the PAAC that funding for many of the projects would be forthcoming from the Bond Issue, but there are insufficient funds derived from the Bond Issue to provide financing for all projects that they would be reviewing. The PAAC has developed three categories for the projects that they reviewed which are Exhibit "A": High Priority - projects that should be considered for funding as soon as possible; Exhibit "B": Projects That Are Not Recommended At This Time - this category includes projects that would be considered if there were sufficient funds available; and, Exhibit "C": Projects That Are Considered As Underway or Completed these projects are considered as underway, ongoing, or have been complete. The PAAC also suggested additional projects for review such as Third Street Improvements. After discussion, some of these added projects were either recommended for funding, not considered at this time, or considered as completed. The PAAC developed a compilation of all projects studied, (projects presented to them by staff and projects that they added) and listed them in Exhibit "D ", Projects That Were Considered. The PAAC projects list exhibits are attached to their Report To The Agency As the Council /Agency is aware, there are many Public Works Projects that are to be paid for in part, or in total, utilizing other funding sources such as Federal ISTEA, State SB -821, State Local Partnership Program Funds, Gas 'Pax, Area of Contribution Funds, Traffic Mitigation Funds, and ('ity General Fund monies. The PAAC was provided with some insight ds to needs for certain projects based on engineering requirements, but in the relatively short period of time that the PAAC had to study the various projects, and the need to proceed with certain public works projects, staff was and is unable to review the technical needs of each and every project. This type of detailed study would take many months and requires a full understanding of traffic engineering, project engineering and design, construction requirements, and the interrelationship between some projects. Also there are projects that need to be ::- onsidered in the near future for approval due to the possible loss in additional funding sources such as the Federal I` >TEA fund projects. For the reasons stated above, staff is suggesting some modifications to the Public Works Projects List as presented by PAAC. Staff would like to point out to the City Council /Agency that the PAAC has spent many hours and much thought developing their list of projects they have categorized as High Priority Projects. Also, it is the PAAC's opinion that these projects are viewed as high priority projects by the Community of Moorpark. Staff has reviewed the PAAC's lists and has made a recommendation for some modifications to their High Priority List which is shown in Staff Exhibit "II". Staff has also made comments relating to the priorities developed by PAAC which is depicted in Staff Exhibit "III ". RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency approve the priority list prepared by Staff (Exhibit II). STAFF EXHI.BI'I "I" MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGNECY 1993 TAX ALLOCATION BOND ISSUE BOND AMOUNT: $10,000,000 DISCOUNT: ($157,500) DEBT SERVICE: ($788,200) COST OF ISSUANCE: ($130,000) SUB TOTAL: $8,924,300 20% HOUSING SET ASIDE: $1,784,860 SUB TOTAL: $7,139,440 PROJECTS WITH FUNDING ALLOCATIONS: 1. UPGRADE BOYS AND GIRL'S FACILITIES: ($21,000) 2. APPRAISAL SERVICE: ($13,500) 3. RR PROPERTY SURVEY: ($9,668) 4. AERIAL PHOTO OF PROJECT AREA: ($1,600) 5. OFFICE EQUIPMENT: ($2,950) 6. STORM DRAIN STUDY: ($20,000) 7. CONSULTING SERVICES: ($5,500) 8. ARROYO PARK FACILITIES: ($226,924) 9. HIGH STREET IMPROVEMENTS: ($20,000) 10. FLORY STREET IMPROVEMENTS: ($65,000) 11. HIGH STREET PARK: ($10,000) 12. MOORPARK AVE. PROPER`T'Y APPRAISAL: ($3,000) 13. CONSULTING SERVICES: ($55,000) 14. LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES: ($13,000) 15. LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES: ($70,000) 16. LEGAL SERVICES: ($15,000) 17. LEGAL SERVICES: ($30,000) 18. LEGAL SERVICES: ($50,000) 19. LEGAL SERVICES AND LAND ACQUISITION: ($1,851,000) FUNDS REMAINING: $4,656,298 STAFF kiXH1131I "I 1' PROJECT PRIORiTy UST AS RFCOMMI:NDED BY STAFF Project Title Description 1. First Street (Moorpark to Bard) and Bard St (2nd St to Rail Property) 2. Moorpark Avenue Storm Drain 3. Poindexter Avenue 4. Spring Road Storm Drain 5. Everett St j Magnolia St South of Everett St Reconstruction of pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk. Design to consider surface drainage improvements. Construction of a storm drain from the south side of Los Angeles Avenue northerly to the MetroLink driveway. Project to include storm drain laterals to Flory Street and curb, gutter and sidewalk on the east side of the street between 2nd Street and 3rd Street. Street reconstruction to include widening, Bike Lanes and sidewalks from Moorpark Ave. westerly: to Gabbert Road. Project provides for the construction of a storm drain from a point north of Los Angeles Avenue northerly to Flinn Avenue. Reconstruction of the street to include new curbs, gutters and sidewalks. Justification Project is already in design. These streets are in poor condition and require reconstruction. This project is a candidate for CDBG funding in the amount of 5280,000. Project is already in design. Includes partial funding by Caltrans. Project is required to solve long standing drainage probleas on Moorpark Avenue, Flory Avenue and at the Metrolink driveway. It is anticipated that this project will be funded by both the MRA and the L. A. Ave. AOC. The condition of the pavement on the heavily traveled arterial street is showing signs of severe distress. There is a pending grant application to fund a portion of project costs. Project is in design. Project funding sources include MRA, L. A. AOC, developers and possibly Caltrans. Construction is recommended at this time in order to effectuate certain obligations of the developers of properties within the drainage area served by this storm drain. These streets are in need of reconstruction or an asphalt overlay. 6. Bard St and Magnolia St Reconstruction and;or overlay of Improvement of these streets will South of Charles St these streets. complete the upgrading of the streets in this neighborhood. Project Title 7. Flory Avenue S. Goldman Ave / Flinn Ave Description Construction of asphalt ) ;erla ;. Construction of asphalt )verlay Justification This street is located adjacent to Flory Elementary School and is heavily traveled by cars and busses. The pavement is showing severe cracking and is in need of an rehabilitation. Both of these streets serve as entrances to a heavily traveled industrial areas. The pavement of both streets show sign of distress and are in need of rehabilitation. 9. High Street: West of Street reconstruction to include This project is related to the Moorpark Avenue curb, gutter, sidewalk and street development of adjacent properties, pave out. including a decision by the MRA regarding MRA -owned property on the south side of the street. 10. Alley Reconstruction 11. L. A. Ave [East] Reconstruction of the alleys southwest of First Street and Moorpark Avenue. Widening of Los Angeles Avenue from Virginia Colony Place easterly to a point approximately 1600 feet east of Spring Road. Project is to provide for two lanes of traffic, a center turning lane and related safety improvements. This project would improve drainage, upgrade the pavement and generally improve the aesthetics of this neighborhood. Project is already in design. This project includes partial funding by Caltrans. Street realignment and widening required to provide left turn staging and to improve overall vehicular and pedestrian safety. The primary funding source for this project will be the L. A. Ave. AOC. It is possible that no MRA funds will be required. STAFF EXHIE311 'I I I" STAFF COMMENTS ON PROJF.CE' AREA ADVISORY COMMITTEE' RECOMME.NDA (IONS I-OR PUBLIC WORK's PROJECTS Priorit Project No. Description _. _ Staff Remarks 1. 14. First Street Reconstruction Listed as the #1 Priority on Exhibit I. 1. 21. Bard Street Reconstruction Construction of these improvements from the Third Street to Rail Property railroad property southerly to 2nd Street is listed as 11 Priority on Exhibit I. It is recommended that the improvement of Bard St south of 2nd St be deferred at this time. 2a. 27a Parkway Landscaping and Entry It is recommended that this beautification 27c Statements: project be deferred until after the 13 • Spring (High to New L. A. Ave. relinquishment of the highway to the City, so • Virginia Colony Dr / L. A. A.',re that the City will have more control over the • Millard ; L. A. Ave. project design. Project funding may be a combination of HRA and L. A. Ave. AOC funds. 2b. 27b. Spring Road Median Landscaping It is recommended that this be deferred to a later phase of Redevelopment Projects, after basic street improvement needs are met. 3. 31. Install Additional Street It is recommended that this project be Lighting L. A. Ave. at Nogales referred to the City for consideration and that any lighting deficiencies be corrected in ac: :ordance with existing street lighting standards. Priority Project No. Description 4. 42. Installation of a block wall along the rear of residential properties on the south side of L.A. Ave. in Virginia Colon: 5. 32. Walnut Street (High St to Charles St): Street reconstruction to include curb, gutter, sidewalks and new pavement with a width of sixty -three (63') to accommodate angle parkinq. 5. 35. Everett Street (Moorpark Ave. to Magnolia Ave): Reconstruction tr include new curbs, gutters and sidewalks. 5. 37. Magnolia St (Charles to Everett) Reconstruction of the street to include new curbs, gutters and sidewalks. 5. 40. Magnolia St (Charles to High St) Reconstruction of the street including curbs, gutters and sidewalks. 5. 41. Bard St (Charles St to High St) Reconstruction of the street including curbs, gutters and sidewalks. 6. [See Priorit-4 #2] 7. 16. Poindexter Avenue Reconstruction 8. 45. Street lights and lights in alley ways between Moorpark Ave. Sprinc Road north of Los Angeles. 9. 44. Construction of pavement improvements at the south end of McFadden and Cornett. Staff Remarks It is recommended that this project be referred to the City and deferred until after the ultimate alignment and right -of -way width for this portion of L. A. Ave. is determined. Project funding may include both MRA and L. A. Ave. AOC funds. Structural damage to adjacent commercial properties will require reconstruction. It is recommended that this street improvement project be deferred until after the parking needs of those properties are better known. This is listed as Project 15 on Exhibit I. This is listed as Project #5 on Exhibit I. This is listed as Project #6 on Exhibit I. This is listed as Project #6 on Exhibit I. This is listed as Project #3 on Exhibit I. It is recommended that this project be referred to the City for consideration and that any lighting deficiencies be corrected in accordance with existing street lighting standards. A contract for these improvements was recently awarded by the City Council (partially funded by Assessment District 92 -1).