HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 1994 0615 RDA REG ii.>'
p Sn
ESTABLISHED
* MARCH A MT
Next Res. 94-29
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
o� 414L R��,�PpQ�a OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
'Fcm,0 0 AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 15, 1994
7: 00 P.M.
Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2 . ROLL CALL:
3. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
4. PUBLIC COMMENT:
5. CONSENT CALENDAR:
6. ACTION/DISCUSSION:
A. Consider Public Works Projects Priority List. Staff
Recommendation: It is the recommendation of the Budget
and Finance Committee and staff that the projects listed
in the combined projects list be accepted for funding by
the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency as recommended in the
report with design work to proceed. (Continued Item 6 .A
from 4/20/94 ; Item 6.A from 4/27/94 ; Item 6.A. from
5/4/94 ; Item 6.B. from 5/18/94 ; Item 6.B. from 6/1/94)
B. Consider Lease of 18 High Street (S/E Corner High and
Moorpark Avenue) with Charles Abbott Associates and
Approval of Storefront Police Facility. Staff
Recommendation: That the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency
approve rental with CAA with them fronting costs with the
rental terms to be negotiated by staff; 2) City Council
approve location of storefront police facility in
conjunction with CAA, City Council defer staffing option
and determination of funding sources for rent and
furnishings to be part of 1994/95 budget adoption.
(Continued Item 6.A. from 5/18/94 ; Item 6.B. from 6/1/94)
C. Consider Approval of Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Budget
for Fiscal Year 1994/95. Staff Recommendation: 1)
Approve the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Budget for
operations in the amount of $509, 551. 00 for FY 94/95; 2)
Authorize the Treasurer to make payment of $781, 838 . 76
for debt service for the 1993 bond issue.
Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Agenda
June 15, 1994
Page 2
7. CLOSED SESSION:
A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956. 8)
Property: APN 511-0-080-19, 511-0-080-20, 511-0-080-21,
511-0-080-31, and portions of 511-0-080-25 and 511-0-080-
26 (North Side of Los Angeles Avenue and South Side of
Poindexter Avenue contiguous to Mission Bell Plaza)
Negotiating Parties: City of Moorpark and Ventura
Pacific Capital Group
Under Negotiation: Terms
B. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956. 8)
Property: APN 511-0-050-09
Negotiating Parties: City of Moorpark and Kirk Aikens
Under Negotiation: Terms
8. ADJOURNMENT:
CITY OF MOORPARK )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
I, Lillian E. Hare, duly appointed Secretary of the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark, County of
Ventura, State of California, do hereby certify under
penalty of perjury, that I posted a copy of the Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency agenda on June 10, 1994 for the meeting
of June 15, 1994 at the following location:
Moorpark Community Center
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, California 93021
Said notice shall remain in place until after the meeting so
that it is available for public review for at least 72 hours
pursuant to Section 54954 et. seq. of the California
Government Code.
(N/P )c f-2 /-
Lillian E. Hare, Secretary �J� rq
6'�
Dated: November 16, 1994 ESTABLISHED you
* MARCH 18. 1987
qo
ye [IF00\14.'
eirrOF1A�o
2 .
RREDDEEV NT Y
mom �
a` 3 % AGENDA REPORT
MOO FARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
The Chairman and Members of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency
Project Area Advisory Committee
February 17, 1994 (MRA Meeting of 03- 02 -94)
SUBJECT: Establishment of Priority List for Public Works Projects
BACKGROUND:
"( E8TAIUM 0
*( MW it My
The first assignment given to the Project Area Advisory Committee (the "Committee ") was the
establishment of a priority list for all Public Works Projects for the City. The Committee has
held several meetings in order to discuss and evaluate the various projects. The Committee also
took a tour of the City which was conducted by Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works in order
to receive his comments on the various projects which helped to establish which Public Works
Projects, in the Committee's collective opinion, should be considered high priority projects.
DISCUSSION:
The Committee has established a Priority List of all Public Works Projects for consideration by
the City Council /Redevelopment Agency. The Committee was directed that they should not
consider the costs of a project but rather the importance of the project when determining
ranking.
The Committee, in evaluating the various projects„ took into consideration which projects would
eliminate blight found in the community, and which projects would have a major positive impact
on various neighborhoods.
The Committee has selected three basic classifications or categories in their listing which are:
(1) Exhibit "A" - High Priority, (2) Exhibit "B" - Should Not Be Considered At This Time,
and (3) Exhibit "C" - Projects That Are Considered Completed Or Underway. Exhibit "D"
shows a compilation of all projects considered.
The Committee would like to convey to the Council /Agency that the consensus was that the
projects with a High Priority are very important Ro our community and should be expedited.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Project -Area Advisory Committee recommends that the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency
receive for consideration the attached Priority List. Further, if the Agency is in concurrence
with the Priority List as presented that the Priority List be adopted for reference when
considering approval of and funding for future Public Works Projects.
cc: Steven Kueny, City Manager
Richard Hare, Deputy City Manager
Steven Hayes, Redevelopment Manager
M RA1 SG R94020/A G N /02117 /94
EXHIBIT "A "
PROJECT AREA ADVISORY COMMITTEE
PUBLIC WORKS I'ROJECTS LIST
HIGH PRIORH Y PROJE( "I'S
.stimated
Priority
Project No.
Description
' st .1
Staff Remarks
1.
14.
First Street
310 000
Project in design. To include
Reconstruction
reconstruction of curb, gutter
and sidewalk. Design to
consider surface drainage
improvements.
1.
21.
Bard Street
200 000
Project being designed in
Reconstruction from Third
conjunction with First Street
Street to RR.
Project.
2a.
27a.
Spring Road Parkway
Landscaping: High Street
to New Los Angeles
2b.
27b.
Spring Road Median Strip
with landscaping
2c.
27c.
Spring Road entrance
enhancements and
treatments with out
signage or lettering
3.
31.
Street lighting L.A. Ave.
(Nogales)
4.
42.
Block wall separating the
back sides of the homes
in Virginia Colony from
E. Los Angeles
5.
32.
Walnut Street - High
100,000
Complete reconstruction of the
Street to Charles
street including new curbs,
gutters and sidewalks. Pavement
with to be with sixty -three
(63') wide to accommodate angle
parking
Project List
Page 2
PUBA -5B
Staff Remarks
To residential tracts in the
downtown area
stimated
Priority
Project No.
Description
Cost,
5.
35.
Everett Street - Moorpark
to Magnolia.
Reconstruction of the
street to include new
curbs, gutters and
sidewalks
5.
37.
Magnolia - Charles to
Everett. Reconstruction
of the street to include
new curbs, gutters and
sidewalks.
5.
40.
Magnolia and Bard -
Charles to High.
Reconstruction of the
street including curbs,
gutters and sidewalks
5.
41.
Bard - Charles to High.
Reconstruction of the
street including curbs,
gutters and sidewalks
6.
13.
Miscellaneous Entry
Statements Virginia
Colony, Millard and L.A.
and Avenida and Condor
7.
16.
Poindexter Street
300,000
Construction
8.
45.
Street lights and lights
in alley ways between
Moorpark Ave. Spring Road
north of Los Angeles.
9.
44.
South end of Mc Fadden
and Corinett.
The Committee would like to
express their unanimous support
for bicycL
ways and lanes
throughout the
City. Whenever or wherever street projec's
are considered
the inclusion
of bicycle ways should be contmplated,
PUBA -5B
Staff Remarks
To residential tracts in the
downtown area
EXHIBI d 'I3"
PROJECT AREA ADVISORY COMMITTEE
PUBLIC WORKS +'ROJECTS LIST
PROJECTS THAT ARE NOT RE-('OMMENDED AT THIS TIME
Estima'ed
No.
Description _ _
ost
Staff Remarks
1.
Storm Drain Study
0, !!0
Master Drainage Study is being prepared.
4.
Spring Road North: Extension of
5,000 0
Spring Rd from Charles Street to
Walnut Canyon Road or Broadway (an
exact alignment has been determined
and an unnamed alternative might be a
road extension to Broadway, west of
the Campus Park Area
5.
Railroad Grade Separation (location
5,000
is undetermined)
6.
Los Angeles Avenue [East]: Widening
4,500 oo
),oject in design. Partially Caltrans
from High Street to South Condor
ended. Design and construction may be
Drive
:oordinated with highway relinquishment
:>roject by Caltrans.
7.
Misc. Traffic Signal Improvements
2,000 i)0
8.
Misc. Storm Drainage Improvements
5 -000 �0
9.
Moorpark Avenue (State Highway 23)
3(0
adjacent to railroad property
approximately 800 feet of frontage
including curb, gutter, sidewalk
and street pave out
10.
Gabbert Road: Widening and
600,)0
reconstruction of existing roadways
11.
Miscellaneous other street, curb,
$5,000,
gutter, and sidewalk improvements
12.
High Street / Moorpark Avenue
3,000, )o
Streetscape Improvements:
Landscaping, lighting, entry
statements and related improvements
for the existing downtown area
Project List
Page 2
No. Description _
15. Moorpark Avenue Storm Drain
17. High Street West of Moorpark Avenue
Reconstruction
18. Casey Road Reconstruction
20. Spring Road Widening: Charles Street
south
22. Miscellaneous Street Reconstruction:
Streets North of Charles Street
23. Goldman Street Overlay
24. Alley Reconstruction: Between First
and Los Angeles Avenue
25. Traffic signal at Flinn, Spring, and
Second Street
26. Maureen Lane South of Los Angeles
Avenue Storm Drain And Overlay
30. Bicycle ways
33. Walnut Street - Charles to Everett.
36. Valley Road. Reconstruction of the
street within the existing forty feet
wide right -of -way. Recommended that
this item be combined with item 41.
38. Flory Street. Asphalt overlay or
reconstruction.
39. Flinn Avenue. Reconstruction of the
street.
PUBA -5C
Estimated
Cost_ $.I Staff Remarks
1,450,X00 Project in design. To include storm drain
laterals to Flory Street and to the
MetroLink Parking lot. Also to include
,urb, gutter and sidewalk on the east side
>f the street between 2nd Street and 3rd
street
400 00
300, 00
[00 0
400 )0
100 0
500 0
25, I')
600, ao
Scope of work to be determined by design
effort.
Final scope of work to be determined by
design analysis.
EXHIBI i "C"
PROJECT AREA ADVISORY COMMITTEE
PUBLIC WORKS IROJECTS LIST
PROJECTS THAT ARE CONSIDERED AS UNDERWAY OR COMPLETED
PUBA -5D
Estima,ed
No.
Description _
Cost
$1
Staff Remarks
1.
Storm Drain Study
10
(10
Master Drainage Study is being prepared.
2.
High Street Improvements
10
i ?0
3.
High Street Park
10
;l0
19.
Charles Street Reconstruction
400
10
"omplete
28.
Avenida Colonia
:'ompleted
29.
McFadden & Cornett Sidewalks
Requires right -of -way
34.
Spring Road Storm Drain.
)roject in design.
Construction of a storm drain from
McDonald's northerly to Flinn Avenue.
43.
Third street improvements.
PUBA -5D
EXHIBI'N "D'
PROJECT AREA ADVPsORY COMMITTEE
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS LIST
PROJECTS THAT WI. €tE CONSIDERED
Estimated
No.
Description
Cost
Remarks
1.
Storm Drain Study
20,u
Master Drainage Study is being prepared.
2.
High Street Improvements
3.
High Street Park
4.
Spring Road North: Extension of
5,000,(
Spring Rd from Charles Street to
Walnut Canyon Road or Broadway (an
exact alignment has been determined
and an unnamed alternative might be a
road extension to Broadway, west of
the Campus Park Area
5.
Railroad Grade Separation (location
5,000,(,
is undetermined)
6.
Los Angeles Avenue [East]: Widening
4,500,(
Project in design. Partially Caltrans
from High Street to South Condor
funded. Design and construction may be
Drive
coordinated with highway relinquishment
project by Caltrans.
7.
Misc. Traffic Signal Improvements
2,000,0,
8.
Misc. Storm Drainage Improvements
5,000,(,
9.
Moorpark Avenue (State Highway 23)
00,(
adjacent to railroad property
approximately 800 feet of frontage
including curb, gutter, sidewalk
and street pave out
10.
Gabbert Road: Widening and
600,01
reconstruction of existing roadways
11.
Miscellaneous other street, curb,
$5,000,0(
gutter, and sidewalk improvements
12.
High Street / Moorpark Avenue
3,000,0(
Streetscape Improvements:
Landscaping, lighting, entry
statements and related improvements
for the existing downtown area
Project List
Page 2
No. Description
13. Miscellaneous Entry Statements
Vergina Colony, Millard and L.A. and
Avenida and Condor
14. First Street Reconstruction
15. Moorpark Avenue Storm Drain
16.
Poindexter Street Construction
17.
High Street West of Moorpark Avenue
Reconstruction
18.
Casey Road Reconstruction
19.
Charles Street Reconstruction
20.
Spring Road Widening: Charles Street
south
21.
Bard Street Reconstruction From Third
Street to RR
22.
Miscellaneous Street Reconstruction:
Streets North of Charles Street
23.
Goldman Street Overlay
24.
Alley Reconstruction: Between First
and Los Angeles Avenue
25.
Traffic signal at Flinn, Spring, and
Second Street
26.
Maureen Lane South of Los Angeles
Avenue Storm Drain And Overlay
27 a.
Spring Road Parkway Landscaping:
High Street to New Los Angeles.
27 b.
Spring Road Median Strip with
Landscaping.
27 c.
Spring Road Entrance Enhancements and
Treatments with out signage or
lettering.
Estimated
Cost $I Staff Remarks
residential tracts in the downtown area
300, 10 Project in design. To include
reconstruction of curb, gutter and sidewalk.
Design to consider surface drainage
improvements.
1,450,, is Project in design. To include storm drain
laterals to Flory Street and to the
MetroLink Parking lot. Also to include
curb, gutter and sidewalk on the east side
0 the street between 2nd Street and 3rd
*reet
300,0
400,E nG
300,
400, Complete
]00,
200, n Project being designed in conjunction with
First street project.
400,
100,
500,
L2'),
600,
Project List
Page 3
No. Description
28. Avenida Colonia
29. McFadden & Cornett Sidewalks
30. Bicycle ways
31. Street lighting L.A. Ave (Nogales)
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40
41.
Estimated
Cost 1`l Staff Remarks _
Completed
Requires right -of -way
Walnut Street - High Street to
Lo0,0{Io Complete reconstruction of the street
Charles
including new curbs, gutters and sidewalks.
Pavement width to be with sixty -three feet
W 'i wide to accommodate angle parking.
Walnut Street - Charles to Everett.
Scope of work to be determined by design
effort.
Spring Road Storm Drain.
Pr J ect in design.
Construction of a storm drain from
McDonald's northerly to Flinn Avenue.
Everett Street - Moorpark to
Magnolia. Reconstruction of the
street to include new curbs, gutters
and sidewalks.
Valley Road. Reconstruction of the
street within the existing forty feet
wide right -of -way. Recommended that
this item be combined with item 41.
Magnolia - Charles to Everett.
Reconstruction of the street to
include new curbs, gutters and
sidewalks.
Flory Street. Asphalt overlay or
Final scope of work to be determined by
reconstruction.
design analysis.
Flinn Avenue. Reconstruction of the
street.
Magnolia and Bard - Charles to High.
Reconstruction of the street
including curbs, gutters and
sidewalks.
Bard - Charles to High.
Reconstruction of the street
including curbs, gutters and
sidewalks.
Project List
Page 4
Estimated
No. Description Cost ,,51 Staff Remarks
42. Block wall separating the back sides
of the homes in Virginia Colony from
the traffic along E. Los Angeles.
43. Third street improvements.
44. South end of Mc Fadden and Corinett.
45. Street lights and lights in alley
ways between Moorpark Ave. Spring
Road north of Los Anqeles.
PUBA -5A
AGENDA b'EPORT
MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TO: Chairman and Members of the Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency
FROM: Steven G. Hayes, Economic: Development Manager
DATE: March 4, 1994 (MRA Meeting of 06/16/94)
SUBJECT: Staff Analysis and Comments on Project Area Advisory
Committee's Priority L_i t for Public Improvement
Projects
BACKGROUND:
On October 20, 1993, the City Council of the City of Moorpark
appointed members of the community to site on the newly form
Project Area Advisory Committee (PAAC). The PAAC, on December
14, 1993 held their first meeting with the City Council's Budget
and Finance Committee. Also in attendance was the Executive
Director of the Agency and the Redevelopment Manager. At that
meeting the PAAC was given the task of reviewing and assigning
priorities to the wide variety of public: works projects.
The PAAC was instructed that in their review of the various
projects that they should not consider the amount of cost of a
project or the funding source. The intent of their assignment
was to have the PAAC make a recommendation as to a Public Works
Project Priority List. Staff was and still is unable to estimate
the cost of many of the projects presented to the PAAC as these
projects have not been designed, 4it:hout the required design
work being accomplished there is -insufficient information to
determine the full scope of a prok?ct and the associated cost for
construction.
At their second meeting, the Executive Director of the Agency
reviewed and discussed questions from the PAAC about the
information given to them. The list of projects given to PAAC
was a compilation of projects taken from the 1993 Tax Allocation
Bond Documents, the Redevelopment elan for the Moorpark
Redevelopment Project, and a list )f ether Public Works Projects
compiled by the Public Works Depar *-meat.
The PAAC has now held several additional meetings in order to
discuss, review and study the various projects. In an effort to
further understand individual pro -iocts the PAAC conducted a tour
of the City with the Public Works Director who showed them the
sites of the various projects.
Also at the PAAC's first meeting Agency staff gave a general
overview of the availability of funds from the 1993 Tax
Allocation Bond Issue (see Staff Exhibit "I "). It was stated to
the PAAC that funding for many of the projects would be
forthcoming from the Bond Issue, but there are insufficient funds
derived from the Bond Issue to pr(vi.de financing for all projects
that they would be reviewing.
The PAAC has developed three categories for the projects that
they reviewed which are Exhibit "A": High Priority - projects
that should be considered for funding as soon as possible;
Exhibit "B ": Projects That Are Not Recommended At This Time -
this category includes projects that would be considered if there
were sufficient funds available; and, Exhibit "C": Projects That
Are Considered As Underway or C'omp,leted - these projects are
considered as underway, ongoing, (r have been complete. The PAAC
also suggested additional project:, for review such as Third
Street Improvements. After discussion, some of these added
projects were either recommended for funding, not considered at
this time, or considered as completed. The PAAC developed a
compilation of all projects studied, (projects presented to them
by staff and projects that they added) and listed them in Exhibit
"D", Projects That Were Considered. The PAAC projects list
exhibits are attached to their Rer.ort To The Agency
As the Council /Agency is aware, there are many Public Works
Projects that are to be paid for in part, or in total, utilizing
other funding sources such as Federal ISTEA, State SB -821, State
Local Partnership Program Funds, Caas Pax, Area of Contribution
Funds, Traffic. Mitigation Funds, wnd 'it.°y General Fund monies.
The PAAC was provided with some irsigtit as to needs for certain
projects based on engineering requirements, but in the
relatively short period of time that the PAAC had to study the
various projects, and the need to proceed with certain public
works projects, staff was and is unable to review the technical
needs of each and every project. rhis> type of detailed study
would take many months and requires a full understanding of
traffic engineering, project engineering and design, construction
requirements, and the interrelationship between some projects.
Also there are projects that need to be considered in the near
future for approval due to the possible loss in additional
funding sources such as the Federal 13TEA fund projects.
For the reasons stated above, staff" its suggesting some
modifications to the Public Works lr)ject:s List as presented by
PAAC.
Staff would like to point out to the City Council /Agency that the
PAAC has spent many hours and much thought developing their list
of projects they have categorized as High Priority Projects.
Also, it is the PAAC's opinion that these projects are viewed as
high priority projects by the Community ()f Moorpark.
Staff has reviewed the PAAC's lists and has made a recommendation
for some modifications to their High Priority List which is shown
in Staff Exhibit "II". Staff has also made comments relating to
the priorities developed by PAAC Which isl depicted in Staff
Exhibit "III ".
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends that the Moorpark. Redevelopment Agency approve
the priority list prepared by Staff (Exhibit II).
STAFF EXHIBIT "I"
MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGNECY
1993 TAX ALLOCATION BOND ISSUE
BOND AMOUNT: $10,000,000
DISCOUNT: ($157,500)
DEBT SERVICE: ($788,200)
COST OF ISSUANCE: ($130,000)
SUB TOTAL: $8,924,300
20% HOUSING SET ASIDE: $1,784,860
SUB TOTAL: $7,139,440
PROJECTS
WITH
FUNDING
ALLOCATIONS:
1.
UPGRADE BOYS AND GILLS PAC= I:LITIES:
($21,000)
2.
APPRAISAL SERVICE:
($13,500)
3.
RR PROPERTY SURVEY:
($9,668)
4.
AERIAL PHOTO OF PR0�1EC "P AREA:
($1,600)
5.
OFFICE EQUIPMENT:
($2,950)
6.
STORM DRAIN STUDY:
($20,000)
7.
CONSULTING SERVICES„
($5,500)
8.
ARROYO PARK FACILITIES:
($226,924)
9.
HIGH STREET IMPROVEMENTS:
($20,000)
10.
FLORY STREET IMPROVEMENTS:
($65,000)
11.
HIGH STREET PARK:
($10,000)
12.
MOORPARK AVE. PROPERTY APPRAISAL:
($3,000)
13.
CONSULTING SERVICES:.
($55,000)
14.
LEGAL AND CONSULTING; SERVICES:
($13,000)
15.
LEGAL AND CONSULTING SERVICES:
($70,000)
16.
LEGAL SERVICES:
($15,000)
17.
LEGAL SERVICES:
($30,000)
18.
LEGAL SERVICES:
($50,000)
19.
LEGAL SERVICES AND L.,AND ACQUISITION:
($1,851,000)
FUNDS
- - - -
REMAINING:
-- _$4,656,298
STAFF EXHIBIT "I k
PROJECT PRIORITY LIST AS kZECOMMENDED BY STAFF
Project Title _ Description
1. First Street (Moorpark to
Bard) and Bard St (2nd St to
Rail Property)
2. Moorpark Avenue Storm
Drain
3. Poindexter Avenue
4. Spring Road Storm Drain
5. Everett St / Magnolia St
South of Everett St
Reconstruction of pavement, curb,
gutter and sidewalk. Design to
consider surface drainace
improvements.
_ Justification
Construction of a storm drain from
the south side of Los Angeles Avenue
northerly to the MetroL.�nk driveway.
Project to include storm drain
laterals to Flory Street: and curb,
gutter and sidewalk on the east side
of the street between 2nd Street and
3rd Street.
Street reconstruction tc include
widening, Bike Lanes and sidewalks
from Moorpark Ave. west >rly to
Gabbert Road.
Project provides for thr- construction
of a storm drain from a point north
of Los Angeles Avenue northerly to
Flinn Avenue.
Reconstruction of the street to
include new curbs, gutt(,rs and
sidewalks.
Project is already in design. These
streets are in poor condition and
require reconstruction. This project
is a candidate for CDBG funding in the
amount of $280,000.
Project is already in design. Includes
partial funding by Caltrans. Project
is required to solve long standing
drainage problems on Moorpark Avenue,
Flory Avenue and at the Metrolink
driveway. It is anticipated that this
project will be funded by both the MRA
and the L. A. .Ave. AOC.
The condition of the pavement on the
heavily traveled arterial street is
showing signs of severe distress.
There is a pending grant application to
fund a portion of project costs.
Project is in design. Project funding
sources include MRA, L. A. AOC,
developers and possibly Caltrans.
Construction is recommended at this
time in order to effectuate certain
obligations of the developers of
properties within the drainage area
served by this storm drain.
These streets are in need of
reconstruction or an asphalt overlay.
6. Bard St and Magnolia St Reconstruction and /or overlay of Improvement of these streets will
South of Charles St these streets. complete the upgrading of the streets
in this neighborhood.
Project Title _ Description
7. Flory Avenue Construction of asphalt overlay
8. Goldman Ave / Flinn Ave Construction of asphalt overlay.
_ Justification
This street is located adjacent to
Flory Elementary School and is heavily
traveled by cars and busses. The
pavement is showing severe cracking and
is in need of an rehabilitation.
Both of these streets serve as
entrances to a heavily traveled
industrial areas. The pavement of both
streets show sign of distress and are
in need of rehabilitation.
9. High Street: West of Street reconstruction t. include This project is related to the
Moorpark Avenue curb, gutter, sidewalk +nd street development of adjacent properties,
pave out. including a decision by the MRA
regarding MRA -owned property on the
south side of the street.
10. Alley Reconstruction
11. L. A. Ave [East]
Reconstruction of the aleys
southwest of First Strer -t anc
Moorpark Avenue.
Widening of Los Angeles Avenue from
Virginia Colony Place easterly to a
point approximately 160G feet east of
Spring Road. Project is to provide
for two lanes of traffic., a center
turning lane and relater, safety
improvements.
This project would improve drainage,
upgrade the pavement and generally
improve the aesthetics of this
neighborhood.
Project is already in design. This
project includes partial funding by
Caltrans. Street realignment and
widening required to provide left turn
staging and to improve overall
vehicular and pedestrian safety. The
primary funding source for this project
will be the L. A. Ave. AOC. It is
possible that no MRA funds will be
required.
STAFF EXHIBIT "I 1 I"
STAFF COMMENTS ON
PROJECT AREA ADVISORY COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR
PUBLIC WORK'S PROJECTS
Priority Project No. Description
1. 14. First Street Reconstruction
1• 21. Bard Street Reconstruction
Third Street to Rail Property
Staff Remarks
Listed as the 11 Priority on Exhibit I.
Construction of these improvements from the
railroad property southerly to 2nd Street is
listed as 11 Priority on Exhibit I. It is
recommended that the improvement of Bard St
south of 2nd St be deferred at this time.
2a. 27a Parkway Landscaping and Entry It is recommended that this beautification
27c Statements: project be deferred until after the
13 • Spring (High to New L. A. Ave. relinquishment of the highway to the City, so
• Virginia Colony Dr / L. A. Ave that the City will have more control over the
• Millard / L. A. Ave. project design. Project funding may be a
combination of MRA and I. A. Ave. AOC funds.
2b. 27b. Spring Road Median Landscaping It is recommended that this be deferred to a
later phase of Redevelopment Projects, after
basic street improvement needs are met.
3• 31. Install Additional Street It is recommended that this project be
Lighting L. A. Ave. at Nogales referred to the City for consideration and
that any lighting deficiencies be corrected in
accordance with existing street lighting
standards.
Priority Project No. Description
4. 42. Installation of a block wall
along the rear of residential
properties on the south side of
L.A. Ave. in Virginia Colony
5. 32. Walnut Street (High St to Charles
St): Street reconstruction to
include curb, gutter, sidewalks
and new pavement with a width of
sixty -three (631) to accommodate
angle parking.
5. 35. Everett Street (Moorpark Ave. to
Magnolia Ave): Reconstruction tc
include new curbs, gutters and
sidewalks.
5. 37. Magnolia St (Charles to Everett)
Reconstruction of the street tc
include new curbs, gutters and
sidewalks.
5. 40. Magnolia St (Charles to High St)
Reconstruction of the street
including curbs, gutters and
sidewalks.
5. 41. Bard St (Charles St to High St):
Reconstruction of the street
including curbs, gutters and
sidewalks.
6. [See Priority 121
7. 16. Poindexter Avenue Reconstruction.
8. 45. Street lights and lights in alley
ways between Moorpark Ave. Spring
Road north of Los Angeles.
9. 44. Construction of pavement
improvements at the south end of
McFadden and Cornett.
Staff Remarks
It is recommended that this project be
referred to the City and deferred until after
the ultimate alignment and right -of -way width
for this portion of L. A. Ave. is determined.
Project funding may include both MRA and L. A.
Ave. AOC funds.
Structural damage to adjacent commercial
properties will require reconstruction. It is
recommended that this street improvement
project be deferred until after the parking
needs of those properties are better known.
This is listed as Project #5 on Exhibit I.
This is listed as Project #5 on Exhibit I.
This is listed as Project 16 on Exhibit I.
This is listed as Project 16 on Exhibit I.
This is listed as Project #3 on Exhibit I.
It is recommended that this project be
referred to the City for consideration and
that any lighting deficiencies be corrected in
accordance with existing street lighting
standards.
A contract for these improvements was recently
awarded by the City Council (partially funded
by Assessment District 92 -1).
•
. r'. MEW
MA
ACTIO D. REPORT
MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/, �7
_�. y . _
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council and
Chairman and Members of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency
FROM: Steve Hayes, Economic Development Manage -� -.
DATE: May 21, 1994 (CC and MRA meeting of 06/01/94)
SUBJECT: Consider Lease of 18 High Street with Charles Abbott
Associates and Approval -)f Storefront Police Facility
BACKGROUND:
During the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency's Closed Session meeting
of September 8, 1993, the lease of 18 High Street was last
considered. The Agency received three (3) proposals for the lease
and renovation of the vacant Santa Barbara Savings and Loan
building. The proposals received it that time were as follows:
1. The Magnificent Moorpark Melodrama and Vaudeville Co.
Proposed Use: Costume rentals, small gift shop and
Historical Society lisplay area.
2. Charles Abbott Associate;, Inc, (CAA).
Proposed Use: CAA, Ventura County Satellite
Engineering Office, Moorpark Building and Safety
and City Engineer.in i Office,
3. Moorpark Chamber of Comm«-�rce .
Proposed Use: Charnoer Office.
The Agency opted to postpone further consideration of leasing the
building, and directed staff to seek a restaurant or similar use
for this key downtown location.
Recently CAA has requested that the City review a new proposal for
the lease of 18 High Street. Councilmember Patrick Hunter has
brought forth a proposal that would combine the use of 18 High
Street with CAA and a storefront. P)li(,e facility.
DISCUSSION•
The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency nas recently received a revised
proposal dated May 13, 1994 (attached), to lease the vacant bank
building located at 18 High Street from CAA. The revised proposal
contains a provision whereby the Sheriff's Department would share
space in the building with CAA. It: is proposed that the Sheriff's
Department occupy up to 120 square feet of the building for their
office use. CAA's rent amount would be reduced on a pro -rata rate
based on the square footage utilized by the Sheriff's Department.
In addition, as needed the Sheriff's Department could have access
to the staff rooms for confidential meetings and for private
interviews with the public.
Based on previous proposals submitted to the City, it will cost
approximately $3,500 to $4,000 for office furniture, and $4,000 for
computer hardware to equip the facility (a total of approximately
$8,000). The Sheriff's Department. share of rent and furnishings
could be funded by the Police Faci.iities Fees Fund. The proposal
from Councilmember Hunter is for 2) hours per week staffing. The
annual cost for a cadet for 1040 hours would be about $17,364. A
civilian cost would be somewhat. I.e -;s.
There are three options for the (::;)st of personnel which are: 1)
divert existing staff at no cost, ) the addition of an additional
cadet or use of civilians, or 3) a ombination of 1 and 2 above for
less cost than 2 above.
The renovation and cost estimation °--o be completed to the building
by CAA are as follows:
1. Front main room; demolish existing counter tops, ceiling,
tile and insulation, bathroom, kitchen and paint
interior. ($11,018.00)
2. Frame and drywall 10 foc--. x 9 foot partition wall.
($480.00)
3. Remove and replace drive -up window. ($900.00)
4. Remove and repair masonry columns and replace with new 6
inch X 6 inch wood post, repair trash enclosure, build
two new wood gates, aid .repair cracks in masonry.
($2,000.00)
5. Redo plumbing for two bathrooms, add kitchen cabinets,
and purchase new wat(r heater for bathrooms and
kitchen.($3,450.00)
I
6. Service check HVAC. ($360.00)
7. Disconnect conflicting electrical wiring. Service
ceiling light panels, install vent ceiling fans in
bathrooms, and add receptacle for hot water heater.
($1,450.00)
8. Install 500 square feet of vertical blinds ($1475.00)
9. Install new flooring for bathrooms, storage area and
kitchen. Floors to be ::overed with vinyl and carpet.
($5,700.00)
10. Install new ceiling tilFS and R -19 insulation.
($1,500.00)
11. Install exterior non - illuminated sign. ($400.00)
12. Install 25 foot flag po e, (:i,= 00.00)
13. Clean interior. ($600.041.
15. Mark -up 20% ($6,166.0(`
16. Landscaping & sprinkler system restoration. ($2,229.00)
17. Water hook -up. ($50.00)
Total estimated cost of renovation $39,278.00
CAA has submitted two (2) options for the lease of the property in
their revised proposal as follows
Option 1: - CAA will pay all renovation costs up front. Upon
completion of those improvements and upon occupancy of the
building CAA will begin rent payments at the rate of $1.00 per
square foot. At $1.00 per square foot for the 1,500 square
feet of building, the $39,278 improvement credit will be paid
off in 26 months. The remaining $278.00 of credit will be
applied during the twenty- seventh (27th) month. Thereafter,
CAA will make payments to the city /Agency of $1,500.00 per
month. CAA will receive a pro -rata credit for monthly rent
based on the square foot. area utilized by the Sheriff's
Department.
This option is based on the Agency paying for landscape
maintenance, and water usage (troth landscaping and domestic
3
water usage). CAA will be responsible for all other utility
costs.
Option 2: - If the City /Agency desires that CAA maintain the
landscaping, CAA proposes that the payment be reduced to $0.90
per square foot for the 1,500 square feet of space. This
equates to a $1,350.00 monthly payment. The $39,278 credit,
discussed in Option 1 above, would be exhausted after twenty -
nine (29) months of rent payments and an additional credit of
$33.19 will extend into the t5irtieth (30th) month.
CAA would also receive a pro -rata credit for monthly rent based on
the square foot area utilized by tht Sheriff I s Department estimated
at about $1,500 per year.
CAA is willing to assume the costs of "minor vandalism" up to
$500.00 a year. Any major damage due to vandalism would be the
responsibility of the City or Agency. According to CAA, there
would be insurance on all equipment and furnishings, which CAA
indicated would satisfy their concerns a- long as there is not an
inordinate amount of theft or buralar /.
CAA is presently under contracT with the City of Moorpark
(Agreement for City Engineering ,ervices dated March 1, 1991).
Section III, General Conditions, (I_.), page 9, of the Agreement
states that, the Engineer shall. prc,v.ide at its own expense for the
duration of this Agreement, offi::e space within the corporate
boundaries of Moorpark at a locati(:.n aired size acceptable to City to
insure convenient service to the �:ublic.
This Section of the Agreement further states that, in the event
City, at its sole discretion, decades to provide office space to
Engineer at City Hall or other C ty owned or leased facilities,
Engineer shall rent from the City an approximate 960 square foot
area at the same rate at which engineer is then paying to rent or
lease the office space referenced above. City shall provide no
less than one hundred eighty 'I IP-)' days written notice of its
intent to exercise this option.
CAA is presently leasing approximately 1,000 square feet of office
space on Poindexter Avenue for ;1,150.00 per month ($1.15 per
square foot). The amount of rent. and possibly other conditions of
the existing Agreement for City Engineering Service will need to be
addressed if the Agency is to cons der the proposed offer of lease
by CAA (the terms proposed in both Dpti.ons 1 and 2 by CAA are close
to market rates and the amount of rent i., comparable for this
4
area). At the same rate ($1.15 per square foot) CAA would be
paying $1,725 a month, less $138 for the area utilized by the
Sheriff's Department for a total of $1_,587.
Staff's opinion is that the existing rent that CAA is paying at the
Poindexter facility, that being $1_.15 per square foot, would be a
reasonable rent for the 18 High Street- facility.
Further, staff suggests that if the Agency is to consider the
proposal by CAA, that during the contract negotiation process, that
additional bids be solicited by CAA in an attempt to lower the
costs for the improvements that art listel above, thus providing a
savings to the Agency.
As stated above, Councilmember Patrick Hunter suggested that this
facility be occupied jointly by CAA and the Sheriff's Department as
a storefront police office. The main office for the contractual
Sheriff's Service would remain )t the East Valley Sheriff's
Station.
The primary reasons for his proposal are: 1) it is a generally
accepted concept in law enforcement. that maintaining a high police
visibility is the greatest deterrent to crime and violence and; 2)
there is no reason to believe that this will not be true for the
immediate area and the entire community of Moorpark, if 18 High
Street were to be utilized for a storefront police facility. The
potential advantages of the Sher..i_f" s Department being located at
this site are as follows:
1. The facility will afford a higher level of citizen
involvement in furtherance of the community based
policing concept, especially for the High Street and
surrounding areas (for 1)ot.r commercial and residential
areas) ..
2. It has been found that the perception of safety is as
important as the level of crime itself and this facility
will add to this perception. When people feel an area is
safe they will be more likely to frequent the area, use
the public facilities arl shop there.
3. Provide a local Sheriff's Department office in our
community for report writing and for the preparation of
follow -up reports. Presently there is no permanent
Sheriff's Department Office or facility in Moorpark.
Sheriff Officers must n(:,jw use the fire station facility
1)
for report writing or are required to travel to the East
Valley Station on Madera Road to fill out and file their
paper work and reports. 'This can save valuable and
costly travel time and increase visibility and active
policing time in our community.
4. The High Street office can be manned by a cadet and /or
civilians and can be open for approximately 20 hours a
week. The staffing of this facility can compliment code
enforcement, neighborhood preservation programs, and
other City activities.
5. The use of a cadet and civilian can free up time for
sworn officers to perform traditional law enforcement
duties (responding °..0 9 11 calls, conducting
investigations, responding tc emergencies and the
enforcement of laws).
6. The High Street office, among ether activities, can be
used for bicycle licensing and dissemination of bicycle
laws information, caAld finger printing and
photographing, community programs, general educational
programs, outreach programs, neighborhood watch programs,
seat belt and child restraint and safety seat awareness
programs, and a convenient office for the dissemination
of information for both the business community and the
residents of Moorpark, ind a " onvenient place for the
public to obtain police r- eports. It should be noted that
the City has a $3,000 State Grant for a hispanic outreach
programs. This and similar programs could be ideally
conducted from the off is •i this location..
7. This office will make available the opportunity for the
person -to- person contact. between the public and Sheriff's
Department personnel wh ch is important for enhancing
public /police relations,. This c :ould be further enhanced
by the use of a spanish speaking cadet or civilian during
operational hours to continue the outreach efforts to the
Spanish Speaking common J nit.a.ted by the $3,000 State
Grant.
8. The High Street office will make available a convenient
and local facility for interviewing witnesses and victims
in private (according t(,, CAA a portion of the facility
can be utilized for confidential office space for this
purpose) . This will also; eliminate the need to leave the
community (both the public and Sheriffs Officers) for
6
these purposes which can again add to the important
policing time and visibility in the community.
9. Provide a convenient office for the public and public
awareness programs.
10. The use of this facility for a Sheriff's Department store
front office would fur*her the City's stated public
safety objectives.
If approved this will be the first storefront facility of its kind
to be operated by the Ventura County Sheriff's Department, and the
City of Moorpark will be takincc the lead in local policing
services.
Staff suggests that, the details of the use of the facility, if the
use as proposed is approved, be finalized and overseen by the
Deputy City Manager which will include the basis of the contract
with CAA and the Agency, the combined use of the facility by the
and Sheriff's Department and CAA, and the approval of the layout of
the facilities.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends:
1. The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency approve rental with CAA
with them fronting costs with the rental terms to be
negotiated by staff.
2. The City Council approve location of storefront police
facility in conjunction with CAA as described in this
report.
3. The City Council defer staffing option and determination
of funding sources for rent and furnishings to be part of
1994/1995 budget adopt.ic,n .
C: \WP51 \LAW \AGENDA \S13H94051.AGN
V
CAAAA i
CHARLES ABBt TZ A�,SO('JATES, INC.
May 13,1994
ATTN: RICHARD HARE, DEPUTY CITY MA NAGEF
CITY OF MOORPARK
799 MOORPARK AVE.
MOORPARK, CA 93021
SUBJECT: PROPOSAL TO RENOVATE; AND RENT CITY OWNED BUILDING
AT 18 HIGH STREET (Revised ( osts from March 12, 1994)
Dear Mr. Hare,
After a more thorough review of the the estimate used in our March 12 letter to you, we
found that the apparent low bidder had not included new costs in his revised bid. We
submit to you this revised cost estimate from the other bidder and a corrected proposal
reflecting the appropriate adjustments for th( work scope you determined. We would
like to reserve the right to reduce these costs by seeking additional bids. We apoligize
for the cost increase from $32,279 to the i low figure, of $39,278 obtained from the
appropriate bid.
Pursuant to our proposal to renovate and rent the subject building, the Sheriff's
Department has expressed an interest in sharing the space with us. At the City's
direction, we have received new estimates f, )r the w4- -)rk, and are submitting for your
review this newest revised proposal.
As you are aware we received estimates and submitted a proposal to renovate and rent
the subject building over 10 months ago. 1)uring this past week, we have received
revised estimates for the renovation of the budding located at 18 High St. These revised
estimates were requested due to (1) additional improvements pursuant to a recent
meeting with City Staff and the Sheriff's Department to provide City and County needs,
and (2) lapsed time rendered the previous estimates invalid. The new estimates are
considerably higher than the previous ones Although some of the cost increase is
attributed to the larger scope of work, the majority of the increased cost is due to a
drastic increase in construction costs sine( the January earthquake. The increased
construction activity, due to the earthquake, leas negated the need for contractors to cut
their profits (as was evident in the earlier pr(,posals) and caused the price of the same
work to climb considerably.
MANAGtMLNT AND ENGIi\ F1t1N(, 6'ROFESSIONAI_,S
371 Van Ness Way • Siiit,� 2110 • Torrance, :; ,1 01-4 I • 310) 212 -:57 -8 • FAX (310) 212 -0993
Offices in Apple Valley, 13r,�10,w i/, r Irmo Hill�z, 6, lldderi Hi( ±s, f,agi,rTa Niguel, Moorpark,
Palos Verdes Estates. Rau, iw 11,d), Vrrd: ;, r )r.; "C1 / I I Il alrnr and Yucca LzallC I/
171-171tcd (— Y ". C 1 ,,,'t'
Richard Hare
May 12, 1994
Page 2
To re -cap, the July 1993 estimates were for renovation of the interior, finish work on the
exterior, and maintenance of the landscaping around the building. The modifications to
the original estimate include the addition of a flag pole, an interior 10' by 9' partition
wall, exterior non - illuminated sign, an increase in the amount of landscaping, removal
of the bank drive - through window, addition )f one more bathroom and installation of
new irrigation lines.
Renovation of this structure will benefit the ( ity by providing a building that the City
will be proud of and be able to rent out for years to come. An enhancement of the
appearance of this highly visible corner will a l yo be a plus.
The appropriate low bid has been attached with the proposed scope of work. I am sure
the City will want to review this scope and ietermine it's adequacy or if it should be
increased or decreased.
The Sheriff's Department has expressed interest in placing a limited amount of
personnel at the location to provide public information and community assistance.
Accommodations for the Sheriff's personnep can be made and the credit to Charles
Abbott Associates, for the rental, can be show i in the monthly payments.
We are aware that the City wants as little involvement as possible in the renovations
and that the City is willing to deduct the impr ovement cost from the rent.
An outline of our proposal is as follows. This proposal and the actual cost benefit to the
City may slightly increase or decrease as wt. complete the actual improvements and
receive final billing, and when we determino the credit from the monthly use of the
Sheriff's Department (to be negotiated).
Option 1: CAA will pay all renovation costs up front. Upon completion of
those improvements and upon occupancy of the building CAA will begin rent
payments at the rate of $1.00 /sq. ft. A breakdown of initial costs is shown below.
cost
Building Renovation (Interior & Extern rr) $36,999
Landscaping & Sprinkler System restoration $ 2,229
Water hookup $ 50
Total Rent Credit $39,278
At $1.00 /sq. ft. for 1500 sq. ft. the $39,278 improvement credit will be paid off in 26
months. The remaining $278 of credit "ill be applied during the 27th month.
Thereafter CAA will make payments to the C. tv of * *$1500 /month. This option
Richard Hare
May 12,1994
Page 3
assumes that the City is willing to provide site /landscape maintenance during our
rental period.
Option 2 If the City desires that CAA maintain the landscaping, we propose
that the payment be reduced to $.90 per sq ft. for the 1,500 sq. ft. space. This equates
to a * *$1,350 monthly payment. The $39,278 credit, discussed in option 1, would be
exhausted after 29 months of rent payments and an additional credit of $33.19 will
extend into the 30th month.
Both options assume that the City will pay for all water bills in addition to exterior
sprinkler maintenance and management. ( AA will share the responsibility for the
remaining utility costs with the Sheriff's department and the City depending on the
determined use.
We look forward to working with the City for a long time and anticipate this move to be
beneficial to both the City and CAA. Please inform us of your decision as we are
presently negotiating a new lease with our ctf Trent landlord.
Sincerely,
Dirk Lovett
Charles Abbott Associates
*Any renovation cost not credited to Charles Abbott Associates due to either of the existing Building and
Safety or Engineering contracts being canceled or any other occurrences which result in the termination of the
rental agreement during the period of rent credit, shall result in a refund by the City to Charles Abbott
Associates for the outstanding credit balance. CAA will waive any right to interest if renovation costs are either
credited or repaid during the rental credit period. (Estitnated at $3300)
** 'rhis will depend upon the actual space that the Sheri I I's I X- partmcni will require.
0513994Relocate
CC: Steve Hayes
Charles Abbott
Attachments (2)
860 Calle Jon
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
-0 /
LAN DSCAP
LANDSCAPE PROPOSAL
BUILDING AND SAFETY
MOORPARK AVE. AND HIGH STREET
Respectfully Submitted
(805) 499 -2017
(805) 484 -2150
Lic. #529131
860 Calle Jon
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
LAN DSC A►'
Job site: Comer of Moorpark Ave. and High St.
Moorpark, CA. 93021
Job for: City of Moorpark
Building and Safety
LANDSCAPE PROPOSAL,
4 -23 -94
(805) 499 -2017
(805) 484 -2150
Lic. #529131
1) ONE TIME CLEAN -UP: Weed, prune and shape shrubbery, and remove proposed plants and
ground cover. Shrubs on south side of property at Moorpark Ave entry to be topped at seven
ft. high.
TOTAL FOR ONE TIME CLEAN -UP $455.00
1) Add 7 yards of soil amendment to proposed planting areas and rototill.
2) Plant: 19 / 5 gallon Ralphiolepis enchantress
35 / 1 gallon Moraea irridoides
19 / flats of Gazania Yellow / Orange
Plants to have slow release fertilizer tablets laced at root ball.
TOTAL FOR ITEMS 'I AND 2 $1129.00
CONT.
Respectfully Submitted t�4 C��
G- (805) 499-2017
860 Calle Jon
(805) 484 -2150
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 L A N D S C A P
Lic. #529131
Page 2
1) Place "walk on bark" 4" thick in proposed back parking lot planters. Total of 1400 sq. ft.
TOTAL FOR BARK. AREA
$645.00
NOTE: You may contact city of Moorpark landscape maintenance division to see if they can
supply bark / mulch for planter area. If so only approx. 4 man hi's labor would be needed
to place bark in planter.
NOTE: Irrigation repair to be billed at $20.00 per man hr plus materials. Approx. time of six
man hr's to repair existing irrigation system.
MONTHLY MAINTENANCE
Service of once a week. Clean planters of debris, weed, and shape shrubbery. Check irrigation
system for broken or malfunctioning sprinkler heads Blow debris off sidewalks and parking lot.
TOTAL MONTHLY FEIN:
$160.00
Materials and labor for sprinkler repair is and addition cost billed at $20.00 per man hr. Billing
at fifteen minute excrements.
Fertilizer to be applied to planter areas approx. three rimes a year at and additional cost of
$30.00 per application.
Respectfully `submitted
PROPOSAL
OLSEN AND SONS CONSTRUCTION
189 SILAS AVENUE
NEWBURY PARK, CA 91320
LIC 0426163 (805)498 -5947
DATE: 4/28/94
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATE
ADDRESS: 111A POINDEXTER MOORPARK C.A.
PHONE: 529 -6864
JOB LOCATION: 18 HIGH STREET MOORPARK CA
WE HEREBY SUBMIT SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR:
DEMOLITION: Existing counter top, drapes, wallpaper, ceiling
tiles and insulation, bathrooi77, ;kitchen.
$4,445.00
INTERIOR & EXTERIOR PAINT & STAIN: Interior walls prime and
paint 2 coats, drywall repair, power wash exterior, paint
2 coats exterior wood trim, paint. existing T -bar ceiling.
$6,573.00
FRAME & DRYWALL: 10'x9' partition. wal.
WINDOWS: R & R drive -up window.
$ 480.00
$ 900.00
MASONRY: Remove two masonry columns and replace with new
6x6 wood post.
Repair trash enclosure and buald two new wood$gates.00
Repair cracks in masonry. $1,050.00
$ 250.00
PLUMBING: Two bathrooms: new wall :nounted sinks, new water
closets, new mirrors.
Kitchen: new sink, new upper and Lower cabinet, new 8 gal
electric water heater to supply bathrooms and kitchen.
$3,450.00
HVAC: Service check.
$ 360.00
ELECTRICAL: Disconnect any conflicting misc. electrical. Service
ceiling light panels. Install ,rent ceiling fans in bathrooms.
Add receptacle for hot water h(aater.
$1,450.00
WINDOW TREATMENTS: Vertical blinds approximately 500 sq ft.
$1,475.00
FLOORING: Resheet both bathrooms anal storage room with 3/8
Plywood. Bathrooms to receive °,inyl faooring with vinyl
base. Kitchen, storage and office space to receive carpet
with vinyl base.
$5,700.00
CEILING: Install new ceiling tile and R -19 insulation.
$1,500.00
SIGN: Exterior non - illuminated lion 18'x14'.
$ 400.00
FLAG POLE: Flag pole 25'.
$1,500.00
FINAL INTERIOR CLEANING $ 600.00
SUBTOTAL $30,833.00
10% OVERHEAD $3,083.00
10% PROFIT $3,083.00
COMBINED TOTAL $36,999.00
THIS IS AN EST ATE ONLY, NOT A BINDING t:'ONTRACT.
SIGNATURE: DATE: -ZS 'p
B Construction
P01
ulnemi Vontracror
Steve Corralejo
Moorpark Building and Public works
18 High Street
Moorpark, CA 93021
FRONT MAIN ROOM
License #531422
Remove existing counter including disconnecting electrical and phone lines as necessary, Remove
existing wallpaper. Remove ceramic floor the In front of counter area. Remove electrical outlets
stubbed up from floor. Prep and paint walls and T- Bargrid as needed. Install new ceiling ule Pleat
Street 290. Reinstall R -19 insulation. Clean existing curtains arouna front windows. Install Tri -Tec
commercial loop 20 oz carpet over appropriate padding.
BREAK ROOM
Install 48Wde x 38" high x 24" deep lower birch cabinet with malamine Interior and flat birch door with
15 "x15" stainless steii sink with Prtce Phisler faucet 071 -420 and white plastic laminate oountertop. Prep
and paint cabinet, waits, and T -Bar grid as needed. Install new calling the Fleet Street 290. Reinstall
R -19 Insulation. Install Trl -Tec Commercial loop 20 oz. carpet over appropriate padding.
LARGE REAR ROOM
Remove partition in front of bathroom. Install paint grade birch door over electrical area opening.
Disconnect surplus phone equipment. Prep and paint bitch door, walls, and T Bar grid as needed.
Install new ceiling the Fleet Street 290. Reinstall R -19 insulation. Apply floor leveler to plywood flooring
as needed. Install Tri-Tec commerciai loop 20 oz. carpet over appropriate padding_
REAR STORAGE ROOM
Repair or replace T -Bar grid as necessary. Prep and paint walls and T -Bar grid as needed. Install new
ceiling the Fleet Street 290. Reinstall R -19 insulation. Apply floor leveler to plywood flooring as needed.
Install Tri-Tec commercial loop 20 oz. carpet over appropriate padding.
BATHROOM
Remove existing plywood floor and install new plywood as needed, install new vinyl flooring Armstrong
Cambray with white plastic 4" base. Clean bathroom walls and mirror. Install new exhaust fan. Prep
and paint T -Bar grid and bathroom door_ Install new ceiling tile Fleet Street 290. Reinstall R -19
insulation.
HVAC CHECKUP
Replace fitters, check system and acid wash colas on two HVAC units.
�) '1.5 'r r _' i i- o n
EXTERIOR
Remove existing block column at drive thru area which was broken loose from sidewalk. Install new
column to match existing. 'Trim ivy from woodwork where necessary. Prop and stain exterior woodwork.
Repair block wall at trash oln area. install one pair of wrought iron gates with sheet metal backing. Haul
away debris from jobsite.
ADDTIONAL ITEMS 4/94
Remove drive thry window. Add 120 square feet to building as per conversation with Steve Cor alejo
4/27184. Install wood sign approximately 2'x18' for "Department of Building & Safety -Moorpark*.
PLUMBING - Demo existing bathrooms and water heater above bathrooms. Rough In new toilet
adjacent to existing wall hung lavatory in ladies room. Install (2) Briggs / 4738 handicap water Closet
with seats. Install (2) American Standard 10321,025 wall hung lavatories. Install (2) Delta /2529 HDF
wrist blade lavatory faucets. Includes new angle stops, polished chrome traps, flexible supplies to each
fixture. All Fixtures except new toilet to be installed utilizing existing plumbing in walls. Install Polar /
422 E (4) hole stainless steel sink (25 ")22"). Install Delta 1100 single handle faucet on stainless steel
sink. Includes rough brass trap, new angle stops, flexible supplies. Sink to be installed utilizing existing
plumbing in walls. Demo and install 20 gallon electric water heater 2500 watt 1120 volt to be installed
above bathrooms in place of existing water heater. Includes Smltty pan and drain line run outside.
Insulate hot lines where accessible. NOTE: T -Top Plumbing Company recelved verbal variance from
Steve, Representative of Moorpark Building & Safety on Handicap space limitations based on size of
room. CB Construction and T Top Plumbing Company not responsible if plumbing and/or walls need to
be moved to meet handicap code. All fixtures to be used as specified or suitable equal.
ELECTRICAL • Demo electrical outlets and drop under floor. Demo electrical at drive up window.
Change out 2x4 drop in fixtures, (standard fixtures). NOTE: Standard factures are becomming obsolete_
Within approximately 2 years we will only be able to squire low wattage lamps for these. OPTION:
Install 2x4 drop ins with T8 Lamps on electronic ballasts. Edison has rebates available for such changes
and down the road you will be able to have brighter tight from a lower wattage lamp. Additional cost
would be $2,070.00.
Price for original items $30.000.00
Price for additional Items roughly $20,000.00 - $25,000.00 Will submit solid prime and thorough write -up
upon inspection of approved plan.
P02
MOORPARK, CAUFOINNIA
FADEVELOPMOff AGENCY
MWTINO I T
- AGENDA REPORT
ACTION:
MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
BY _ �C
TO: Chairman and Members of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency
FROM: Steven G. Hayes, Redevelopment Manager *'
DATE: June 9, 1994 (MRA Meeting of 06/15/94)
SUBJECT: Consider Approval of Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Budget
for Fiscal. Year 1994/19P5
DISCUSSION•
The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Budget for Fiscal Year 1994/1995
is attached. The total amount of the proposed MRA Budget is
$509,551.00 which includes costs r -)r personnel, and operations and
maintenance.
These funds will be initially expended by the City and repaid by
the Agency as requested. The previous years budget (FY 1993/1994)
was in an amount. of $476,958. FY L'-)()4,/I,)()5 budget is an increase
of $32,593.00.
Payment in the amount of $781,83.76 for the 1993 Tax Allocation
Bonds is due in Fiscal Year 1994 '1995. Staff requests that the
City Council approve MRA authorization for payment on the debt
service for the bond issue in the imosant stated above, as payments
are due.
RECOMMENDATION: (Roll Call Vote'
Staff recommends that the Moorpax. Redevelopment Agency:
1. Approve the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Budget for
operations in the amoun,. of $509,551.00 for FY 94/95.
2. Authorize the Treasurer tc make payment of $781,838.76
for debt service for the 1')93 bond issue.
SGH056- 06/08/94