HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 1994 0803 RDA REG ofpPMENT4
ESTABLISHED
MARCH 18.18i7 * Next Res. 94-29
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
cq4/PORN �* AGENDA
yFCar OF ppQ� WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 3, 1994
7: 00 P.M.
Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2 . ROLL CALL:
3. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
4. PUBLIC COMMENT:
5. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Consider Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
the Redevelopment Agency of July 20, 1994 .
Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as processed.
6. ACTION/DISCUSSION:
A. Consider Housing Rehabilitation Loan and Grant Program.
Staff Recommendation: Receive the report for review,
comment and direction to staff, and that the Chairman
appoint an ad hoc committee to review the draft outline
and monitor the development of the housing program.
Any member of the public may address the Agency during the Public
Comments portion of the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or
Discussion/Action item. Speakers who wish to address the Agency
concerning a Public Hearing or Discussion/Action item must do so
during the Public Hearing or Discussion/Action portion of the
Agenda for that item. Speaker card must be received by the Agency
Secretary for Public Comment prior to the beginning of the Public
Comments portion of the meeting and for Discussion/Action items
prior to the beginning of the first item of the Discussion/Action
portion of the Agenda. Speaker Cards for a Public Hearing must be
received prior to the beginning of the Public Hearing. A
limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon each Public
Comment and Discussion/Action item speaker.
Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Agenda
August 3 , 1994
Page 2
7 . CLOSED SESSION:
A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956 .8)
Property: APN 511-0-080-19 , 511-0-080-20, 511-0-080-21,
511-0-080-31, and portions of 511-0-080-25 and 511-0-080-
26 (North Side of Los Angeles Avenue and South Side of
Poindexter Avenue contiguous to Mission Bell Plaza)
Negotiating Parties: City of Moorpark and Ventura
Pacific Capital Group
Under Negotiation: Terms
B. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956. 8)
Property: APN 511-0-050-09
Negotiating Parties: City of Moorpark and Kirk Aikens
Under Negotiation: Terms
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (pursuant to
C.
Government Code Section 54956. 8)
Property: APN 511-0-050-014
Negotiating Parties: City of Moorpark and John and
Stephanie Casillas
Under Negotiation: Terms
D. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956. 8)
Property: 18 High Street
Negotiating Parties: City of Moorpark and Charles Abbott
& Associates
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
E. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956. 8)
Property: 226 High Street
Negotiating Parties: City of Moorpark and Kenneth Moss
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
8. ADJOURNMENT:
Copies of each item of business on the agenda are on file in the
office of the City Clerk and are available for public review. Any
questions concerning any agenda item may be directed to the City
Clerk/529-6864 .
CITY OF MOORPARK )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
I, Lillian E. Hare, duly appointed Secretary of the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark, County of
Ventura, State of California, do hereby certify under
penalty of perjury, that I posted a copy of the Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency agenda on July 29, 1994 for the meeting
of August 3 , 1994 at the following location:
Moorpark Community Center
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, California 93021
Said notice shall remain in place until after the meeting so
that it is available for public review for at least 72 hours
pursuant to Section 54954 et. seq. of the California
Government Code.
Atie=0
Lillian re, Secretary J�LOpMEIyTc
Dated: November 16, 1994 44
ESTABLISHED
* MARCH 18. 19137
r c'41lIFOROV
ITE
M
MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Chairman and Members of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency
MOORPAW CAUFOOM
FROM: Steven G. Hayes, Redevelopment Manager "( V�0/A "AQBWV
MKnW
DATE: July 22, 1994 (Meeting of 08/03/94)
SUBJECT: Housing Rehabilitation Loan and Grant Program AC110N:
z
BACKGROUND:
During the Fiscal Year 1994 -1995 Budget adoption process, it was
determined that the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency would be
responsible for the development of a Housing Rehabilitation
Program. On April 13, 1994, the Budget and Finance Committee
reviewed a Report to Council that was received by the City
Council /Redevelopment Agency on April 14, 1994 attached). The
Budget and Finance Committee (Paul Lawrason, Mayor and Scott
Montgomery, Councilmember) recommended a Housing Program along the
lines of that recommended by staff with low and very low income
resident /owners of property eligible for a $5,000 grant and $10,000
loan with a $15,000 combined cap.
The term of the loan portion recommended was 10 years with interest
rates based on T -bill (long bond) or fixed at a rate to be
determined. It was further recommended that the Affordable Housing
Fund Griffin portion be used for generic housing programs and that
the Affordable Housing Fund Villa Campesina loan repayment portion
be used for the Gisler Field Project.
On April 14, 1994, the City Council /Redevelopment Agency received
the staff report and preliminary information on funds available and
basic criteria as recommended by the Budget and Finance Committee
and staff for a Low and Very Low Income Housing Rehabilitation
Program.
It is suggested that the following approaches to this program be
taken:
1. Designate a small target area for proactive contact such
as Moorpark Avenue, High Street, or Everett Street;
2. Make the program available as an alternative to code
enforcement actions; and
3. Make the program available upon request to those who
qualify.
DISCUSSION:
For discussion purposes, Agency staff has prepared an Outline for
the proposed Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Housing Rehabilitation
Loan and Grant Program, which is attached for review and comment.
This Outline is intended to give an overview of how a program of
this nature can be structured and the methodology that is available
to: 1) establish target area(s) through a needs assessment survey,
2) establish eligibility to participate in the program, 3) types of
programs to be implemented with funds available, and 4) other
funding sources.
At present, funds have been identified and that are available for
this program are: 1) existing and future tax increment revenues, 2 )
20% of the proceeds from the 1993 bond issue, 3) proceeds from the
sale of the housing portion of the Gisler Fields Project, 4) CDBG
funds, and 5) the City's Housing Fund. Other funding sources and
housing programs will be explored by staff for inclusion into the
overall program.
Since the Redevelopment Division received this assignment, A. J.
Alldredge, Housing Rehabilitation Officer has been closing out his
code enforcement files and staff has been gathering information on
programs from various cities and housing agencies. Staff has
obtained estimation on costs for various types of construction and
improvements that may be considered for this program. Information
is also being compiled from the County Assessors Records for
establishment of target areas. This information will be mapped for
presentation.
The results of this implementation phase will be to produce a
realistic program contained in a single document (guidelines
manual) that will include all essential information including
eligibility for the program, procedures, forms for the
administration of the program, and a procedural manual for the
participant.
In order to receive as much input as possible, staff suggests that
an ad hoc committee be appointed by the Chairman to review the
attached draft outline and monitor the development of the housing
program.
RECOMMENDATION•
That the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency receive the report for
review, comment and direction to staff, and that the Chairman
appoint an ad hoc committee to review the draft outline and monitor
the development of the housing program.
SGH081- 07/22/94
ITEM-1-1 f
City of Moorpark
Agenda Report
TO: The Honorable City Council /'� /`'' vl
FROM: Richard Hare, Deputy City Manager(
Steven G. Hayes, Economic Developriw t Manager
DATE:
April 14,
1994
(CC Mtg. 4/20/94)
SUBJECT:
Consider
Funding
and Criteria for Low and Moderate
Income Housing Rehabilitation Programs
Discussion
In accordance with Section 33334.2 of the California Community
Redevelopment Law (CCRL) , "Not less than 20 percent of all taxes
which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 33670 shall be
used by the Agency for the purpose of increasing, improving, and
preserving the community's supply of low and moderate income housing
available at affordable housing costs ". This 20 percent housing set
aside requirement applies to all Agency Bond Proceeds.
In response to the requirements of the CCRL, City /Agency staff
recommend that a housing program be established for the City of
Moorpark.
Available Funds
The first step in the establishment of such a program is to identify
the funds available. At present, the total combined funds for
housing programs is approximately $673,000, (MRA $500,000, City
Housing Fund $150,000, and CDBG $23,000). The attached (Table 1)
spreadsheet shows MRA Funds, (Tax Increment Revenue and Bond
Proceeds) received to date, and projected revenues at 20 percent to
the year 2000.
Housing Programs
In addition to the construction of new affordable housing, there are
other housing rehabilitation programs which can be made available.
Staff reviewed these programs along with the available funding with
the Budget and Finance Committee on April 14, 1994. The Committee
outlined some guidelines for both types of programs which are
presented for the Council's consideration.
Moorpark Redevelopment Agency housing funds ($500,000) are currently
designated for the Gisler Affordable Housing Project as reserve, but
a portion of these funds could be allocated to other housing programs
at the Agency's discretion.
It is the Committee and staff's recommendation that Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding be used for construction
related expenditures or grants and not be used for loans. Using
these funds for loans would needlessly increase the
administrative cost of any loan program.
• Specifically, current CDBG and Affordable Housing (Fund 22)
monies which are repayments of loans from the Villa Campesina
Project ($115,000), should be applied to the Gisler Affordable
Housing Project.
• Griffin Homes ($166,000) and other sources such as the MRA
should be used for generic housing programs (eg. first time home
buyer programs).
• Housing rehabilitation programs can consist of loans or grants
for very low (50% of median income) and low income (80% of
median income) owner /residents of housing in the redevelopment
project area and loans for moderate income (120% of median
income) owner /residents. (see attached Table)
• Loans to be limited to $10,000 and grants to $5,000 for very low
and low income with a $15,000 combined cap and loans limited to
$15,000 for moderate income.
• Loans to be for a term of 10 years or less, with monthly
amortization, interest to be set at 80% of the Long Bond (30
year Treasury).
• Annual review of the loan terms and interest rate applied for
new loans and annual reporting to the City Council.
Recommendation
The Budget and Finance Committee and staff recommend Council adoption
of the guidelines proposed above and direct staff to prepare a plan
for implementation of a housing rehabilitation program along the
proposed guidelines.
C: \WPWIN60 \CC.REP \LOANPRGM.WPD
TABLE I
20 PERCENT HOUSING SET-ASIDE FUNDS
BASE YEAR 1988/1989 TO 1999/2000
INCREASE IN
ENTRY FISCAL
ASSESSED
ASSESSED VALUATION
TAX INCREMM(T
HOUSING FUNDS
NO. YEAR
VALUATION
OVER BASE YEAR
REVENUES AT 1%
20% HOUSING FONDS
CONULATIVE
1. 1988/1989
$260,645,252
$0
$0
$0
$0
2.* 1989/1990
$295,844,170
$35,198,918
$0
$0
$0
3. 1990/1991
$325,020,649
$64,375,397
$157,085
$31,417
$31,417
4. 1991/1992
$365,839,369
$105,194,117
$256,431
$51,286
$82,703
5. 1992/1993
$386,703,674
$126,058,422
$1,311,826
$262,365
$345,068
6. 1993/1994
$379,419,965
$118,774,713
$1,187,747
$237,549
$582,618
7. 1994/1995
$398,390,963
$137,745,711
$1,377,457
$275,491
$858,109
8. 1995/1996
$418,310,511
$157,665,259
$1,576,653
$315,331
$1,173,440
9. 1996/1997
$439,226,037
$178,580,785
$1,785,808
$357,162
$1,530,601
10. 1997/1998
$461,187,339
$200,542,087
$2,005,421
$401,084
$1,931,686
11. 1998/1999
$484,246,706
$223,601,454
$2,236,015
$447,203
$2,378,888
12. 1999/2000
$508,459,041
$247,813,789
$2,478,138
$495,628
$2,874,516
1. ( *) PLAN ADOPTION FY 1989/1990 BASED ON
21.88196525 % RATIO
OF NOORPARK TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE OF $1,352,000,000.
2. 1990/1991 TO 1992/1993 SHOWS ACTUAL FONDS RECEIVED BY COUNTY.
3. 1993/1994 TO 1999/2000 ARE PROJECTED FUNDS TO BE RECEIVED AT 5.00%
WHCIH IS THE PERCENT OF
INCREASE PROJECTED FOR THE LIFE OF THE
PLAN.
TAX ALLOCATION BOND HOUSING
---------------------------------------------------
FUNDS: ------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------=
- - - - --
-----
$1,784,860
TAX INCREMENT NOOSING FUNDS
RECEIVED: ---------------------------------------------------------------
- - - - --
$345,068
SUB TOTAL FY 1993/94: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - - - --
$2,129,928
PROJECTED TAX INCREMENT HOUSING FUNDS: --------------------------------------------------------------
- - - - --
$2,529,448
TOTAL HOUSING FUNDS TO BE RECEIVED BY AGENCY
FY 1999/2000: ------------------------------------------
- - - - --
----- - - - - --
$4,659,376
(1
0
6932 INCOME LIMITS May 31, 1994
NUMBER OF PERSONS IN FAMILY
1 2
TUOLUMNE Very low income
Area median: Lower income
12900
14700
16550
18400
19850
$36,800 Median income
20600
23550
26500
29450
31800
Moderate income
25750
29450
33100
36800
39750
38800
46550
30900
35300
39750
44150
47700
VENTURA 50%, Very low income
Area median: gp %Lower income
20250
23150
26050
-28950
31250
$57,900 Median income
27950
31900
35900
39900
43100
1 ?o°)oM ode rate income
40550
48650
46300
55600
52100
57900
62550
24600
30800
27350
34200
29550
62550
69500
75050
YCLO
Area median:
$43,100
YUBA
Area median:
$34,200
Very low income
Lower income
Median income
Moderate income
Very low income
Lower income
Median income
Moderate income
7 8
21350 22800 24300
34150 36500 38850
42700 45650 48600
51200 54750 58300
33600 35900 38200
46300 49500 52650
67150 71800 76450
80600 86200 91750
15100
24150
17250
19400
21550
23250
25000
26700
28450
30150
27600
34500
31050
34500
37250
40000
42750
45500
36200
41350
38800
46550
43100
51700
46550
55850
50000
53450
56900
59950
64100
68250
11950
19150
13700
21900
15400
17100
18450
'19850
21200
22550
23950
27350
24600
30800
27350
34200
29550
31750
33950
36100
28750
32850
36950
41050
36950
44350
39650
47600
42400
45150
50900
54200
Higher income limits apply to families with more than eight persons. For all income groups, the income
limits for families larger than eight persons are determined as follows: for each person in excess of
eight, add eight percent of the four - person income limit base to the eight - person limit, and round the
answer to the nearest $50. For example, the nine - person very low income limit for Alameda County
is $38,700. ($27,650 x .08 = $2,212; $36,500 + $2,212 = $38,712; $38,712 rounded = $38,700.)
HUD 5131194
Authority: Section 50093, Health and Safety Code.
Reference: Sections 50079.5, 50093, and 50105, Health and Safety Code.
ri
a
0
w
W
z
H
H
0
U
z
w
c�
H
z
w
a
0
a
w
W
A
w
a
a
a
a
0
0
z
0
H
H
H
a
H
G�
x
W
a
0
z
H
0
x
.
0
0
a
a
E
z
a
z
a
z
a
0
a
A
w
a
a
w
a
a
U
z
w
0
H
z
w
a
0
a
w
w
A
W
a
�G
a
a
a
0
0
z
rn
a
h
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
I. PROGRAM GOALS ......... ............................... 1
II. NEEDS ASSESSMENT ...... ............................... 2
III. DEVELOPMENT OF PROGRAM TYPES 2
IV. FUNDING SOURCES ....... ............................... 3
V. ESTABLISHMENT OF TARGET AND PROGRAM AREAS ............ 3
VI. DEVELOP PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION GUIDELINES ............ 4
EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT A ELIGIBLE REHABILITATION WORK
EXHIBIT B CONSTRUCTION NEEDS FORM
EXHIBIT C CONTRACTORS INFORMATION FORM
EXHIBIT D PROCESSING SUMMARY
SGH079R3- 07/22/94
(1)
PROPOSED OUTLINE FOR
MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM
SECTION I. PROGRAM GOALS
The City of Moorpark acknowledges that there is a need for a
community wide strategy to assist low and very low income
homeowners to live in decent, safe and sanitary housing.
Similarly, there is a necessity to maintain and enhance the
viability and character of the community by eliminating
deteriorating influences through preservation and
rehabilitation. This recognizes the important fact that a
well maintained housing stock is among the City's most
valuable resources.
Obviously, people of very low income (50% of median income or
$28,950 for a family of 4) and low income (80% of median
income or $39,900 for a family of 4) are the least able
financially to afford needed home repairs and improvements.
As a normal result of deferred maintenance, deterioration has
the opportunity to set -in and, not only can a building become
a health and safety hazard to occupants and nearby residents,
but it can also detract from the overall appearance of the
neighborhood, thus negatively affecting property values. Once
a neighborhood starts to decline, a host of social problems
usually begin to develop which require added expenses for such
services as police, health, fire, code enforcement, etc.
For these reasons, it is in the best interest of the general
public that the following goals be achieved:
1. To improve the quality of life for low and very low
income home owners in Moorpark, by assisting them with
necessary and desirable repairs and general property
improvements to make their homes decent, safe and
sanitary, and to ease overcrowding; and
2. To preserve and increase the supply of the City's low and
very low income housing stock by the implementation of
various housing programs including loan and grant housing
rehabilitation programs..
1
SECTION II. NEEDS ASSESSMENT
1. The Agency will conduct a survey (needs assessment) of
existing housing to determine the number of units needing
repair and an estimation of cost of repair for the
housing located in the Moorpark Redevelopment Project
Area. This will necessitate a survey of all housing
units to be conducted by the Housing Rehabilitation
Officer. It is proposed that a listing of units and
owners be compiled from the County of Ventura Assessors
Rolls and units and deficiencies be mapped using
assessors parcel map. The information gathered will then
be plotted on a demonstration map for review.
2. Prior to the survey, information letters, channel 10, and
press releases will be utilized to inform property owners
and tenants of the program and request cooperation with
the inspections.
After the survey has been completed, the needs assessment
will be compiled and costs will be estimated for the
needed work to be performed and funding sources matched
to the needs identified.
A sample of the type of work that will be evaluated and
considered for the program is attached as Exhibit "A"
Eligible Rehabilitation Work. Also a sample form for
compiling needed improvements is attached as Exhibit "B ".
SECTION III. DEVELOPMENT OF PROGRAM TYPES
1. After the needs assessment has been completed, the staff
will match the needs with various programs types
established by the Agency. The types of programs that
have been discussed are grants, loans and a combination
of grants and low interest loans. The amounts and rates
are to be determined. There may be other funding sources
available which staff will present as an overall
assistance program.
2. Other sources of funding and possible categories of
assistance may be through various lending institutions.
Agency staff has contacted several banks that are
interested in participating in some form of housing
program with the City /Agency in order to receive credit
in the Community Reinvestment Act. The lending
institutions are able to assist in the processing of loan
2
applications and administer the loan programs. Staff
will evaluate the effectiveness of programs that involve
the processing by the various banks.
3. As part of this program, the Agency will need to
establish lending criteria for this program and who would
be eligible for the various programs and at what level of
funding should be made available.
SECTION IV. FUNDING SOURCES
In accordance with Section 33334.2 of the California Community
Redevelopment Law (CCRL), "Not less than 20 percent of all
taxes which are allocated to the agency pursuant to Section
33670 shall be used by the agency for the purpose of
increasing, improving, and preserving the community's supply
of low and moderate income housing available at affordable
housing costs ". The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency has set
aside the required 20 percent of tax increment revenues for
housing purposes. In addition, 20 percent of the 1993
$10,000,000 bond issue has been transferred to the Agency's
Housing Fund.
To assist in the funding for this program, Agency staff will
be exploring all other possible funding sources including
federal, state and local funding sources and programs.
SECTION V. ESTABLISHMENT OF TARGET AND PROGRAM AREAS
At the completion of the above listed tasks, Agency staff will
prepare a report on the establishment of a target area or
areas in the Moorpark Redevelopment Project Area that will
take into consideration; 1) the information provided from the
Needs Assessment Survey, 2) cost for improvements necessary to
have an impact, and 3) the availability of funds for the
various programs established.
Through this process, staff will prepare a report that will
recommend target area(s) within the Redevelopment Project
Area, or conceivably that a target area(s) is unrealistic and
that other project involvement criteria should be established.
3
SECTION VI. DEVELOP PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION GUIDELINES
There are several ways for the administration of the proposed
housing rehabilitation program to be conducted. The Agency
can administer the programs with existing staff or there are
County and private agencies that for a fee will administer
these programs. The Agency can have a bank or lender process
the various loans and grants, or staff can also be responsible
for this process, or the Agency upon reviewing the report may
select a combination of outside and staff administration. The
administration responsibilities will also include inspection
and approval of the repair work to be performed. Staff will
prepare and present a report on the various methods of
administering the program which will include the pros and cons
for the Agency's review.
The program will require that permits be issued and monitored,
especially for tracking the progress of construction for
payments. The various methods of permit processing and
monitoring will also be a part of this administration report.
Part of the administration of the permit process will be the
development of a contractors list. Attached as Exhibit "C"
is the type of information that will be on file for
contractors who will be recommended to perform work for this
program. The program may be designed to allow the applicants
to solicit bid from contractors and submit the bids for
approval by the Agency. A sample of the type of processing
for this program is shown in Exhibit "D" attached.
The above outline is just the start in the preparation of an
overall Housing Assistance Program and is presented for discussion
purposes only. Agency staff in the near future will request input
from the City Council /Redevelopment Agency, appropriate committees,
and the public. It is intended that the comprehensive program will
be contained in a single implementation manual that will be
available to the public.
The final product will be a comprehensive and realistic housing
program that will be intended to eliminate blight as defined by the
California Community Redevelopment Law and help maintain the
existing housing stock for the low and very low income families in
our community.
EXHIBIT "A"
ELIGIBLE REHABILITATION WORK
A rehabilitation loan should provide for (1) correction of
identified health and safety violations for the protection and
safety of the household, (2) reestablish the property in a
generally good and maintainable condition with necessary
facilities (including plumbing, electrical, and heating
facilities) in good working order, and (3) facilities arranged
and equipped for suitable and desirable living conditions
( which may include room additions to ease overcrowding per HUD
standards) commensurate with the type and quality at the
property under consideration. In addition to those costs for
rehabilitation to make the property conform to the Uniform
Building Codes, water and energy conservation modifications
should be addressed.
Correction of Code violations may be made eligible under the
rehabilitation loan program. If there is a health or safety
hazard on a unit, it is suggested that the property owner will
have priority over a first -come first -serve basis policy.
SPECIFIC WO RK MAY INCLUDE
- Roof repair or replacement.
- Repair of or replacement of heating /cooling, plumbing and
electrical systems /components.
- Insulation, weatherization, and installation of energy -
saving systems or components and water saving devices.
- Repair or replacement of structural components, damaged
walls, doors, windows, screens, hardware, cabinets,
bathroom fixtures, or kitchen fixtures and appliances.
- Installation, repair or replacement of concrete
walk /patio slabs, and wood patio covers.
- Additions and remodeling to ease overcrowding conditions
and clutter; adapt dwelling for use by handicap persons;
enlarge and /or re- arrange of rooms and spaces for proper
access per minimum HUD standards.
(Page 1 of 4)
Exterior and interior painting.
- Replacement of deteriorated floor coverings and counter
tops.
- Rodent and termite extermination.
Correction of dry rot.
- Hook up to sanitary sewers.
Installation, repair or replacement of fences, driveways,
and landscaping.
Additional items consistent with livability, etc., and
approved by the committee.
EXTERIOR APPEARANCE IMPROVEMENTS
In recognition that a significant element of the program
is to improve the exterior appearance of the property,
and to support and encourage neighborhood upgrading, a
grant or loan or both may be applied for exterior
improvements and repairs. The Redevelopment Manager will
review application for eligibility for grant and loan
funds based on the following criteria:
EXTERIOR PAINTING /STUCCO REPAIR
Exterior painting and stucco repair (stucco is only
a percentage of grant) to replace weather damaged
or dry rotted, faded, scaling, exterior wood (trim
and facial wood siding) and deteriorated paint is
eligible, but repainting and restuccoing just for a
change in color is ineligible.
Repair /replacement of deteriorated, hazardous
driveway or walks with concrete or asphalt is
eligible. New hard - surface installation is
eligible to up grade the site or to eliminate an
unsightly or hazardous condition.
FENCES
Repair /replacement of unsightly or hazardous fences
is eligible.
(Page 2 of 4)
NDSCAPING
- Installation repair or replacement of landscaping
components to eliminate an unsafe or unsightly
condition is eligible.
Soil imports to assure plant growth and for unsafe
or unsightly conditions.
Shade tress, shrubs, vines and perennial (annuals
or bulbs are ineligible).
- Sod, ground covers.
Irrigation systems.
Shrub beds with rock /bark over black plastic and
redwood or rubberized material for borders
(concrete or masonry borders are ineligible, unless
to repair existing deteriorated materials).
OTHER ELIGIBLE COSTS
- In addition to the cost of eligible rehabilitation work,
the following cost relating to the rehabilitation may
also be included in the rehabilitation loan:
- Architectural and engineering services
- Geologic and soils reports
- Blueprints
- Appraisal fee
- Credit reports
- Title reports
- Loan processing
- Escrow fees
- Warehousing fees
- Recording fees
(Page 3 of 4)
Building and other permit fees
Termite inspection reports
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE DECLARED INELIGIBLE IF THEY
- Are inconsistent with the general intent behind the
eligible rehabilitation work which is designed to provide
for a safe and decent living environment.
Do not make a needed contribution to the basic livability
and habitability of the property and are for aesthetic
purposes only such as mahogany wood trim with brass
fittings.
- Unnecessarily exceed existing standards of the
neighborhood.
EXAMPLES OF INELIGIBLE WORK
- Fireplaces, fire pits, barbecues.
- Swimming pools, spas, water fountains, saunas.
- Brick work /stonework, (unless to repair existing damaged
work).
- Concrete block walls, (unless to repair damaged work or
where retaining walls are necessary).
- Replacement of healthy plant material or similar up grade
work is ineligible, (unless to eliminate an unsightly or
unsafe- condition).
(Page 4 of 4)
ExH =B =T "B••
CONSTRUCT 2 ON N E E D S F ORM
ELECTRICAL KIT.
PLUMBING KIT.
SINK /STOVE TOP /DISPOSAL /CABINETS
LACK OF OR IMPROPER:WC_
LAV_, TUB
-SHOWER _K I T SNK_
HOT &COLD WATER FIXTURES_
DRAINAGE SYSTEM., -_
LACK OF OR ADEQUATE:LIGHT
&VENTILATION HEATING
ROOM & SPACE DIMENSIONS
LESS THAN CODE CEILING
HEIGHT LESS THAN CODE
INADEQUATE ELEICTRICAL
SERVICE_WIRING_HAZ_
FAULTY WEATHER PROTECTION
INADEQUATE EXITING:
STRUCTURAL:
STRUCTURAL:
MISC:
EXHIBIT "C"
CONTRACTORS INFORMATION FORM
To: Contractors for Bid List
Re: Housing Rehabilitation Program
Attention:
I would like to take this opportunity to inform you of the Housing
Rehabilitation Program that is being administered by city staff for
the City of Moorpark and the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency. As the
Redevelopment Manager, all bid and contracts will be administered
through my office.
Copies of and the following credentials must be provided:
- You must be licensed in the state of California;
- bonded;
- have a current business permit and /or license with the
City of Moorpark; and
- covered by workmen's compensation insurance.
Please provide your complete and current address, including contact
people and other information on the enclosed information sheet, as
soon as possible to:
Redevelopment Manager
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark Ca 93021
If you have any questions, you may contact my office at (805) 529-
6864, extension 225.
(Page 1 of 3)
Contractor's Information
Company N
Company Address
City and Zip Code
Fed. ID Number Lic. Number
or SS Number
Contact Person(s)
Classification
(Page 2 of 3)
Date
Phone
Licensed Work Experience
Please describe any licensed contracting work you have done that
may be of interest or benefit to the Rehabilitation Program.
Provide location and for whom the work was performed, for future
reference.
Send the desired information as soon as possible.
Thank You.
Redevelopment Manager
City of Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency
(Page 3 of 3)
EXHIBIT "D"
CITY OF MOORPARK HOME REHABILITATION PROGRAM
PROCESSING SUMMARY
I. Intake /Determination of Eligibility by Staff
A. Request for information
1. Pull out inquiry file and use Agency adopted income
criteria to determine initial eligibility.
2. Render general information and collect all
information needed to log inquiry and mail
application materials.
B. Application Processing
1. Review application and
information received.
assign a case number.
mail an "application r
together with list
interview.
recheck eligibility based on
Log the application and
Set up an applicant file and
eceived" letter to applicant
of documents needed for
II. Initial Interview /Site Inspection with Homeowner by staff
A. Client Interview
1. Explain program and loan eligibility to applicant
using interview checklist.
2. Collect all income information and determine
eligibility and loan type - Deferred or Amortized.
Fill out Deferred Loan paperwork with applicant or
if an Amortized Loan explain materials and leave
with homeowner to be filled out later.
B. Work Write Up
1. Inspect property with homeowner to determine code
deficiencies and repairs /improvements for inclusion
into work write up.
1
III. Bid Package Preparation By Staff
A. Work Write up
1. Prepare work write up outlining scope of work and
specifications based upon property inspection
notes. Identify all noted code deficiencies.
B. Cost /Loan Estimate
1. Prepare preliminary cost estimate for scope of
work.
C. Contractor List
1. Prepare a list of contractors applicable to work
outlined for homeowner.
D. Homeowner Approval
1. Obtain homeowner approval of work write up and
estimates prior to submitting Amortized loan
package and before ordering title reports for
Deferred Loan applicants.
IV. Financial Review and Loan Processing by Lending source
A. Amortized Loan Processing
1. Agency staff shall forward to Lending source a
complete loan package including letter of
introduction, completed and signed loan application
with appropriate supplemental information,
employment verification and credit release, fair
lending notice, information exchange release and
description of proposed rehabilitation work and
loan estimate.
2. Lending Source shall obtain credit reports and make
recommendation on acceptability of homeowner's
credit; obtain property title and appraisal
reports; process loan application based on Agency
eligibility requirements and lending criteria; and
provide applicant and Agency with written
notification of approval or disapproval of loan
(form letter to be prepared by Agency Staff).
V.
VI.
Lending source will prepare loan documents upon
Cities request following the "committee's" loan
approval.
B. Deferred Loan Processing
1. Agency staff shall forward to lending source a
request for title report together with Deed of
Trust for the referenced property.
2. Lending source shall obtain Title report and
forward to Agency staff. (Deferred Loans require a
City /Agency second trust deed position). Lending
source shall prepare loan documents upon Agency's
request following "committee's" approval.
Loan SianingjPreconstruction Conference
A. Loan Signing
1. Lending Source upon Agency's request, prepares Deed
of Trust, Promissory Note and Notice of Right of
Recision, and forwards these documents to the
Agency for application endorsement.
2. Agency staff meets
notarize documents.
to the Lending Sot
copies of "Right of
three day period in
contract.
with applicant to sign and
Signed documents are forwarded
irce. Homeowner retains two
Recision" documents and has a
which to cancel the loan and
B. Preconstruction Conference
1. Simultaneous with the loan signing, Agency staff
shall conduct a preconstruction conference with the
homeowner applicant wherein Home Rehabilitation
Agreements, Proceed Orders, Homeowner /Contractor
Contracts are issued, as well as work scheduling,
inspection, and payment procedures discussed.
Construction Supervision
Agency staff shall conduct compliance inspections, to ensure
work is being performed according to codes, work write up
3
specifications and is proceeding in a timely and satisfactory
manner. Agency staff shall process contractor invoices for
progress and final payments. Staff shall obtain all necessary
lien releases from contractors and maintain complete
documentation in each project file as well as all accounting
information as required for Agency audit.
4