HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 1995 1206 RDA REG ���vpPMENT4 6�
4.
' ESTABLISHED —
* MARCH 10.1asl * Resolution No. 95-39
MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Ok
414.cgklF0V1 QP REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
C/ry Of �09�` WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 1995
7:00 P.M.
Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2 . ROLL CALL:
3. PUBLIC COMMENT:
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Consider Approval of Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the
Moorpark Redevelopment Agency of November 1, 1995 .
Consider Approval of Minutes of a Special Meeting of the
Moorpark Redevelopment Agency of November 1, 1995.
Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes as processed.
5. ACTION/DISCUSSION:
A. Consider Gisler Field Housing Site Request for Bids.
Staff Recommendation: 1) Authorize staff to proceed with
the release of the Request for Bids; 2) Request the
Economic Development and Affordable Housing Committee to
recommend a policy for the requirement of low and
moderate housing as required by CCRL Secton 33413 .
6. ADJOURNMENT:
Any member of the public may address the Agency during the Public
Comments portion of the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or
Presentations/Action/Discussion item. Speakers who wish to address
the Agency concerning a Public Hearing or Presentations/
Action/Discussion item must do so during the Public Hearing or
Presentations/Action/Discussion portion of the Agenda for that
item. Speaker cards must be received by the Secretary for Public
Comment prior to the beginning of the Public Comments portion of
the meeting and for Presentations/Action/Discussion items prior to
the beginning of the first item of the Presentations/
Action/Discussion portion of the Agenda. Speaker Cards for a
Public Hearing must be received prior to the beginning of the
Public Hearing. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed
upon each Public Comment and Presentations/Action/Discussion item
speaker. Copies of each item of business on the agenda are on file
in the office of the Secretary and are available for public review.
Any questions concerning any agenda item may be directed to the
Secretary/529-6864.
CITY OF MOORPARK
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
I, Dorothy J. Vandaveer, duly appointed Deputy City Clerk of
the City of Moorpark, County of Ventura, State of
California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that
I posted a copy of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency agenda
on December 1, 1995 for the regular meeting of December 6,
1995 at the following location:
Moorpark Community Center
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, California 93021
Said notice remained in place so that it was available for
public review for at least 72 hours prior to the meeting
pursuant to Section 54954 et. seq. of the California
Government Code.
Dorothy andaveer, Deputy City Clerk
Dated: December 30, 1995
/& -6�-(gJ
I i C N . .
MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Chairman and Members of the Moorpark Redevelopment
Agency
FROM: Steven G. Hayes, Redevelopment Manager
DATE: November 22, 1995 (Mtg. 11/29/95)
SUBJECT: Request for Bids - Gisler Field Housing Site
BACKGROUND
On August 31, 1995, The Economic Development /Affordable Housing
Committee reviewed this project and recommended that staff prepare
conditions for the selling of the property and that the conditions
of the selling of the property be reviewed by the Agency. On
October 4, 1995, the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency directed staff
to proceed with placing the land designated for the Gisler Field
Housing Project on the open market. During ownership, the City and
Agency have contributed to the value of this property. The
City /Agency contributions include: 1) paving, curbs, gutters and
sidewalk improvements to Poindexter Avenue, 2) block wall on south
property line to be constructed by adjacent commercial project, and
3) paid off the assessment for Assessment District 92 -1.
DISCUSSION
Attached is a draft of the Request for Bid (RFB) that will be sent
to all interested individuals outlining the terms that the Agency
will require for the purchase of the Gisler Field Housing Project
Property. Staff is seeking direction from the Agency regarding
issues that are contained in the RFB. Section 15, Page 4 contains
the California Community Redevelopment Law, Section 33413, which
requires affordable housing in the Redevelopment Project Area.
While the law is precise that there is a specific requirement for
very low units it allows discretion as to the number of low to
moderate units. The Section language is as follows: "At least 15
percent of all new and substantially rehabilitated dwelling units
developed within a project area under the jurisdiction of an agency
by public or private entities or persons other than the agency
shall be available at affordable housing cost to individuals and
families of low or moderate income." The Agency can require all of
these units to be low or all to be moderate or a combination of the
two.
p®EVBAr"
Also there may be a fraction of a unit. Should the developer be
required to pay the Agency a percent of the cost of a unit and
should that value be determined by the City wide average or some
other index or should an additional unit be built or should it be
rounded to the nearest whole number. The City could also reduce
fees, if developer provides for more low than moderate units.
There is a multitude of scenarios that could be made to apply to
this issue. It should be noted that if the Agency supports a
housing project with any form of tax increment revenue, the
requirement for low and moderate units increases to 30 percent and
the requirement for very low units increase to 50 percent.
Staff is requesting that the Agency direct the Economic Development
and Affordable Housing Committee to consider this matter and
recommend a policy to Agency they would apply not only on this site
but for all sites within the Project Area. The Committee should
make a recommendation prior to February 7, 1996. This decision may
affect item 11 of the RFB.
There may be other conditions that the Agency would like to have
inserted in the RFB or discussed.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the following:
1. That the Agency authorize staff to proceed with the
release of the Request for Bids.
2. That the Agency direct the Economic Development and
Affordable Housing Committee to recommend a policy for
the requirement of low and moderate housing as required
by CCRL Section 33413.
2
RE QU E S T F OR B I D S
RE S I D E NT Z AL OWN ERS H Z P PROSE C T
G= S L ER F= E LD VACANT PRO P ERT Y
MOORPARK CAL I F ORN 312%,
I -43-'E3 TJ IE D B Y
TH E MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT
AG EN C Y
DECEMBER p 1 9 9 5
REQU E S T FOR B I D S
FOR TH E PURL HA S E O F
VACANT LAND KNOWN A S
G= S L ER F= E LD
I. Site
The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency ") is soliciting
bids for the purchase of vacant land known as Gisler Field.
The site contains approximately 8 acres located south of
Poindexter Avenue, west of Chaparral School, north of Lassen
Avenue, and east of Moorpark Estates (see attached map labeled
Exhibit "All). The Agency wishes to sell the property to a
developer.
The Agency currently owns the property and has $1,500,000 of
Agency Funds invested in the land. The land is zoned
Residential Planned Development -15U (RPD -15U). Although the
zoning would permit a higher density for this site, the City
will limit the development so as not to exceed approximately
50 units.
Electrical, phone, cablevision, and gas utilities are in place
along the full extent of Poindexter Avenue. There is an
easement for sewer, water and storm water utilities in a
commercial development to the south. The City has designed a
7.5 acre planned neighborhood park (Poindexter Park) that will
be constructed to the east of the housing site. A 40 foot (53
foot right -of -way) public street will be constructed abutting
the west property line of the park that will run north to
south. The developer will construct or cause to be
constructed this street to City Standards (B -S -A).
The City of Moorpark is a participating member of California
Valleys Housing Finance Authority program which enables first
time individual home buyers below market interest rate
financing.
II. Site Constraints
As stated above, it is anticipated that there will be
constraints placed on the development of this site by the City
through the Residential Planned Development approval process.
These conditions will be addressed in Section III.
1
0 01 W." P
The project site is abutting an existing residential housing
tract to the west. At present there are existing backyard
fencing for these units that may have to be extended to the t
west property line of this project. A solid block wall at the
west property line that will be a minimum of 6 feet on the
side of the existing homes to the west, is lih to be��'
required by the City as a condition of development.,'
The Agency is in possession of a soils report that will be
made available upon request. The report indicates that there
is 5 to 8 feet of old or disturbed porous fill not suitable
for supporting structural foundations and there is a need for
earth removal and recompaction.
There is a twenty foot Southern California Edison easement
along the western property line, ten feet of which is on this
site.
III. Residential Plan Development Conditions
It is anticipated that the following will also be requirements
of the City for the development pf this site:
'r� . ,,c°l
1. Approximately 5Q,units -to be developed on this site.
2. single story detached construction abutting
the western property line.
3. There will be a north south 40 foot street (53 foot
right -of -way) abutting the park. The developer will pay
for this street (estimated cost $115,576). There will
also be a storm drain system in the street with an
estimated cost of $93,498. *
* Without the aid of conceptual design on the subject site,
the City has made certain assumptions with respect to
grade and drainage on the main access road. The design
of the road is based on reasonable engineering judgement
but in no way guarantees the most economical development
of the residential site as it relates to on site grading
and drainage improvements.
Bidders must satisfy themselves by personal examination
of the site, contract documents or any other means as
they may believe necessary, as to the actual physical
conditions, requirements and difficulties under which the
2
site must be developed. No bidder shall at any time
after submission of a bid make any claim or assertion
that there was any misunderstanding or lack of
information regarding the nature or amount of work
necessary for satisfactory development of the property.
4. Approximately 20 ± feet of landscape setback along
Poindexter Avenue. This width can include the existing
parkway and sidewalk. An approximate 8 ± feet of
landscape setback along the north south street. This
width is in addition to the street right -of -way.
5. Block wall to match the block wall being constructed on
the west and north property line of the commercial
development south of this site. The block wall is to be
on all side and rear yards abutting a street and along
south, west and north property line. The commercial
developer is responsible for construction of a wall
separating the commercial project from the housing
project.
6. Homes cannot front or have access from Poindexter Avenue
or from the street running north and south on east
property line.
7. Two car garage.
8. The Developer will be expected to pay all City
development fees pursuant to the current fee schedule.
The fee schedule to be effective as of January 1, 1996 is
attached. Fees include but are not limited to:
a. Quimby fees
b. Building and Engineering Fees
C. Planning fees
Residential Planned Development
Tract Map
Zone Change
Condition of Compliance
Zone Clearance
Traffic Model Maintenance
3
Initial Study **
d. City Wide Traffic Mitigation Fee
e. Assessment District Fees
f. LAAAOC
** There may be additional costs for mitigated
negative declaration. Possible special studies may
include but are not limited to; traffic studies,
soils reports, and drainage studies.
9. The developer will also be required to pay fees for other
agencies. The determination of those fees shall be the
developer's responsibility.
10. In accordance with Section 33413 (b) (2) (A) (i) of the
California Community Redevelopment Law, the City will
require the developer to provide restricted units for low
and moderate income families as follows: "At least 15
percent of all new and substantially rehabilitated
dwelling units developed within a project area under the
jurisdiction of an agency by public or private entities
or persons other than the agency shall be available at
affordable housing cost to persons and families of low or
moderate income. Not less than 40 percent of the
dwelling units required to be available at affordable
housing costs to persons and families of low or moderate
income shall be available at affordable housing cost to
very low income households."
The restriction shall be for the duration of the
Redevelopment Plan which life is 40 years or until Fiscal
year 2028/2029. The developer will provide bids on the
following scenarios:
11. Developer will not be eligible to receive any proceeds
from a subsequent resale of any restricted unit. The
selection and qualifications of buyers and related
activities will be administered by Agency /City. All
decisions related to this shall be at the sole discretion
of Agency /City. The selected developer will be required
to assist the Agency /City in publicizing and qualifying
buyers.
4
That the developer provide affordable dwelling units as
follows:
A. 6% of the total number of dwelling units at the
very low income levels and 9% of the total number
of dwelling units at the low income level.
B. 6% of the total number of dwelling units at the
very low income levels and 9% of the total number
of dwelling units at the moderate income level.
C. 6% of the total number of dwelling units at the
very low income levels and 4 1/2% of the total
number of dwelling units at the moderate income
level and 4 1/2% of the total number of dwelling
units at the low income level.
The bids must contain all three scenarios.
12. The Agency shall be paid in cash at close of escrow. The
minimum bid accepted shall be $1,500,000. The developer
may submit bids based on the following:
A. The developer may submit a bid based on the Agency
receiving payment (close of escrow) prior to the
developer receiving entitlement (RPD and tract map
approval).
B. The developer can submit a bid based on close of
escrow after receiving entitlement (RPD and tract
map approvals).
IV. Bid Procedures
The Agency will receive sealed bids no later than 3:00 p.m. on
February 16, 1996, at City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue,
Moorpark, California, attention City Clerk. As stated above,
the Agency will not consider any bid lower than $1,500,000.
The bids shall state when the Agency will be paid for the land
and how much the Agency will receive. The Agency will pay
half of the escrow costs. The Agency has the right to reject
any and all bids. The Agency will not be responsible for, nor
will pay any brokerage fees.
If you need additional information please contact Steven G. Hayes,
at (805) 529 -6864, extension 225.
RGISLER- 10/23/95- November 30, 1995
5
)48•w
. K7
As
R= 272',L °55A�
qs2,��' :'S►
Q5
Fr2?Z�`�
i -}
Q �
J
2
1.67Ac.
I 9, LASSEN
r
EAST
j
$ •
TIT "OA of
x
3O
Rs27ks1LA1� lu
)ETA 11 Y
ca(e 1 ' =20d
35PN20
15 �
I
S W COR•
LOT P
T
27
1.57Ac.
CE7. 67'
SHASTA AVE.
Q Q
POR. TRACT L. RANCHO SIMI
02
0
TER AVE.
W-
09
b
9
J y 470.98 , EAST r 1400.2
47' L ps 720.67' N9 •59'i5'w ANGELES 1556.49' WEST
(WY 118)
K
Bk50s
NOTE: ASSESSOR PARCELS SHOWN Or , MIS PAGE
DO W9 NECESSARILY CONSTITUTE LEGAL LOTS.
CHECK WH COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE OI'.
PLANNING DIVISION TO VERIFY.
Parcel Map, P.M. Bk.38,Pg.56 Tract 4757 -1, M.R. Bk. 124, Pg. 65
Rancho Simi, R. M. Bk.31 Pg. 7 NOTE-A33assor's Brock Nuff"m
Par Lot P "Poindexter Sub" R M. Rk 5 _ Pn i A33033or43 Pbrcol Nur►>b*rs
�
e
235
LA
--
'
LASSEN ►5
6.
a
) 9302/6677
12
6
tia
Q
3 49
�
Po
450A
a � �
�-
SEE DETAIL Z
LLJ
0
o
38 PM 58
SIERRA
AVE.
MIS L98
�
Par..3
14
fm
N
L80
19 Ac.
470.GT'
`
SM90
it
n EVE
C C .
�a343AC.
O
= A V
T
eTeA o"afsc> N
� t
r5
—
9
J y 470.98 , EAST r 1400.2
47' L ps 720.67' N9 •59'i5'w ANGELES 1556.49' WEST
(WY 118)
K
Bk50s
NOTE: ASSESSOR PARCELS SHOWN Or , MIS PAGE
DO W9 NECESSARILY CONSTITUTE LEGAL LOTS.
CHECK WH COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE OI'.
PLANNING DIVISION TO VERIFY.
Parcel Map, P.M. Bk.38,Pg.56 Tract 4757 -1, M.R. Bk. 124, Pg. 65
Rancho Simi, R. M. Bk.31 Pg. 7 NOTE-A33assor's Brock Nuff"m
Par Lot P "Poindexter Sub" R M. Rk 5 _ Pn i A33033or43 Pbrcol Nur►>b*rs
= N C OME L =MIT S
lm�
PERSON S = N FAM = L Y
COUNT Y O F VEN TURA
INCOME
PERCENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
V
50%
20250
23150
26050
28950
31250
33600
35900
38200
80%
28150
32150
36200
40200
43400
46650
49850
53050
100%
40550
46300
52100
57900
62550
67150
71800
76450
120%
48650
55600
62550
69500
75050
80600
86200
91750
Table applicable for Fiscal Year 1995/1996
SGH- INCOMLIM -1- /24/94
s � x�
MOORPARK
1 as moorparK Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss.
CITY OF MOORPARK )
I, Lillian E. Hare, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark,
California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing Resolution No. 95 -1157 was adopted by the
City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on
the 1st day of NOVEMBER , 1995, and that
the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS HUNTER, PEREZ AND WOZNIAK
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: MAYOR LAWRASON
ABSTAIN: NONE
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City
this 3rd day of NOVEMBER , 1995.
Lillian E. Hare
City Clerk
PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. BERNARDO M. PEREZ PATRICK HUNTER SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK
Councilmember Councilmember
aii (nq Costs Above the Overhead Cost Est
Att achme
B
mates
iGenerally, mailings are completed by the delpartment
If completed by others in the department, it is
Cleric
billed to the project
l k�id—e.
and w
ud not
!be applicable.
cost per
�Cost Items
Clerical Aide
unit
hour
unit
-----------
5.79
--- ---
Inumber Of L
300
nits
cost
0.0193001
(folding/ nsert
0.32
1
0.32
Postage
1st Class
t n-v e-I o-p 6-s-
Paper
Clercial Aide
- 2-- 8- -.3-4 5001
�250 sheets 2.666667
-'b-o-x-
reem
T
0.05668
0.010667
(applying postage/sealing env.) !hour
Overhea-d-
5.79
1000
0.00579
Supervision/Admin. Sect.
50-941
24.49087
2081
**
0.624
Cost per ieoe
to employee b
nefits for p
rt-time empliloyees
1,036437
1
includes percent above salary relateo
10 % of time supervising, 3 percent of thelwork
C
Revised October 26, 1995 Page I
Effective by Resolution No.
I . Community Development Department Staff - Actual time spent on land use applications at real time cost rate of $84..00 per hour.
2. Contract Planning Staff - Cost plus 15% T'to
3. Code Enforcement Staff - Actual time spent on land use applications and other reimbursable or cost recovery activities at real time cost rate of $69.00/hr.
4. Administrative Services Staff - Actual time on land use applications and other reimbursable or cost recovery activities at real time cost of $82.00/hr.
5. Final cost of processing will be computed upon actual time expended, (based upon the established hourly rates). If final cost is less than the deposit fee received, the unused portion of
the deposit fee received, the unused portion of the deposit shall be refunded to the applicant. If final costs is more than the deposit fee received, the balance shall be payable by the
applicant up to 75% of the original deposit. If the cost of processing is expected to be more than the original deposit, plus 75% of said deposit, the City Council may approve the
collection of an additional deposit as they deem appropriate.
DEPOSITS - A payment for the processing of an Entitlement Permit for those Deposit Items numbered I through 26.
Item Permit Type: Item No. Staff Hours Dollar Deposit Amount: NOTE or ADDITIONAL AMOUNT
No. (Hours x $84.00)
I .
Pre - Application Fee
I .
10 hours $840.00
25 hours $840.00 Plus $9.30 per unit
25 hours $840.00 Plus $9,30 per unit
120 hours $10,080.00
2
Residential Planned Development
2,
2.a
Mobilehome Park
2.a.
2.1b
Residential (Single - family & multi - family)
2.b.
3
Commercial Planned Development
3
4
Industrial Planned Development
4
170 hours $14,280.00
5.
Conditional Use Permits
5
5.a.
Residential & Accessory Uses
5.a.
18 hours
$1,512.00
5.b.
Agricultural & Accessory Uses
5.b
24 hours
$2,016.00
5.c.
Commercial, Industrial Uses
5.c.
50 hours
$4,200.00
5.d.
Insttutional Uses
5.d.
42 hours
$3,528.00
5.e.
Oil Drilling & Production
5.e.
170 hours
$14,280.00
5.f.
Quarries or Mining
5.f.
170 hours
$ 1 4,280.00
5.g.
Waste/Disposal/Treatment
5.g.
170 hours
$14,280.00
6.a.
Sheriff Department
6.a.
3 hours
$252.00
7.
Zone Change
7
28 hours
$2,352.00
7.a.
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
7.a.
20 hours
$1,680.00
,w,
1. 1Y
Revised October 26, 1995 Page 2
Effective by Resolution No. _
I . Community Development Department Staff - Actual time spent on land use applications at real time cost rate of $84..00 per hour.
2. Contract Planning Staff -Cost plus 15%
3. Code Enforcement Staff - Actual time spent on land use applications and other reimbursable or cost recovery activities at real time cost rate of $69.00/hr.
4. Administrative Services Staff - Actual time on land use applications and other reimbursable or cost recovery activities at real time cost of $82.00/hr.
5. Final cost of processing will be computed upon actual time expended, (based upon the established hourly rates). If final cost is less than the deposit fee received, the unused portion of
the deposit fee received, the unused portion of the deposit shall be refunded to the applicant. If final costs is more than the deposit fee received, the balance shall be payable by the
applicant up to 75% of the original deposit. If the cost of processing is expected to be more than the original deposit, plus 75% of said deposit, the City Council may approve the
collection of an additional deposit as they deem appropriate. 11,
8
Subdivision Deposits
8.a.
Tentative Tract Map
8,a
31 hours
$2,604.00
8.a. plus $65.00 per lot or unit. Contract Services include City
Consultant work related to Environmental Impact Studies and review of
Hydrology, Geological, and Traffic Studies. The Consultant will
estimate the deposit required based on each individual application.
8.b
Tentative Parcel Map, Parcel Map Waiver, or Conditional
Certificate of Compliance
8.b.
31 hours
$2,604.00
8.b. plus $65.00 per lot or unit. Contract Services'include City
Consultant work related to Environmental Impact Studies and review of
Hydrology, Geological, and Traffic Studies. The Consultant will
estimate the deposit required based on each individual application.
8.c.
Time Extension for Approved Tentative Tract Map
8.c.
20 hours
$1,680.00
8.d.
Time Extension for Approved Tentative Parcel Map
8.d.
15 hours
$1,260.00
8.e.
Lot Line Adjustment
8.e.
15 hours
$1,260.00
9.a.
Variance
9.A.
19 hours
$1,596.00
Per lot
9.b.
Existing Single Family Residential Variance
9.b.
5 hours
$420.00
10.
Major Modification
10
see note
80% of current deposit amount
1 1.
Minor Modification _
1 1
7 hours
$588.00
12.
Appeal
12
see note
25% of current deposit amount or 4 hours, whichever is greater.
13
Environmental Analysis
13
see note
In addition to the deposit for permit or entitlement, city will receive 100% of cost from applicant
No Cap, including any City Administrative charge for contract employees. Staff will inform
applicant of additional costs anticipated for 90 days, when 80% of Initial Deposit has been spent.
13.a
Initial Study Review (including Negative Declaration)
13.a.
24 hours
$2,016.00
13.b.
Environmental Impact Report
13.b.
100 hours
$8,400.00
c.
Environmental Impact Report Supplemental
13.c.
24 hours
$2,016.00
4,
Special Consultants (for Environmental or other Studies required).
14
100% of
actual cost plus
15% 1
Contract Services include City Consultant work related to Environmental Impact Studies
Geological Studies and city Attorney review. The Consultant will estimate the deposit required
based on each individual application.
Revised October 26, 1995 Page 3
Effective by Resolution No. _
I . Community Development Department Staff - Actual time spent on land use applications at real time cost rate of $84..00 per hour.
2. Contract Planning Staff - Cost plus 15% ,r ;
3. Code Enforcement Staff - Actual time spent on land use applications and other reimbursable or cost recovery activities at real time cost rate of $69.00/hr.
4. Administrative Services Staff - Actual time on land use applications and other reimbursable or cost recovery activities at real time cost of $82,00/hr.
5. Final cost of processing will be computed upon actual time expended, (based upon the established hourly rates). If final cost is less than the deposit fee received, the unused portion of
the deposit fee received, the unused portion of the deposit shall be refunded to the applicant. If final costs is more than the deposit fee received, the balance shall be payable by the
applicant up to 75% of the original deposit. If the cost of processing is expected to be more than the original deposit, plus 75% of said deposit, the City Council may approve the
collection of an additional deposit as they deem appropriate.
P,
15.
Land Conservation Act Contract (Agricultural Preserves)
15.a.
Applications
15,a.
18 hours
15.b.
Cancellation
15.15.
18 hours
18 hours
$1,512.00
$1,512.00
15.c.
Portion Non - Renewable
15.c.
16.
Landscape Plan Review & Inspection
16
8 hours
$672.00
17.
General Plan Amendments
17
25 hours
$2,100.00
Plus $9.30 per acre.
I
18.
Specific Plan
(455 hours per plan per year)
18
200 hours
$16,800.00
Plus $5.60 per lot or unit. City will receive 100% of cost from applicant
No Cap, including any City Administrative charge for contract
employees. Staff will inform applicant of additional cost anticipated for
90 days, when 80% of Initial Deposit has been spent.
19.a.
Development Agreements (City Engineer, City Attorney), Initial
Deposit
19.a.
190 hours
$15,960.00
19.b.
Annual Review
19.1b.
20 hours
$1,680.00
20.
Condition Compliance Review
20
see note
100% of current deposit.
21.
Traffic Model Use
21
see note
100% of actual cost plus 15 %. Deposit amount determined by staff.
22.
Director Approved Administrative Permit
22
3 hours
2.00
23.
Cost Recovery Fee (Deposit based on case by case estimate, no
less than $84.00)
23
see note
At least $84. ased on a case by case basis.
24
Temporary Use Permit
24
1 hour
$84.00
25
Administrative clearance (minor variance)
25
3 hours
$252.00
26
Reversion to Acreage
26
15 hours
$1,260.00
27
Other
27
see note
100% of actual costs. Occasionally, special reviews are required and not addressed specifically by
this schedule, (such as traffic analysis reviews). These requirements determined by the Director of
Community Development, based on the nature of the review.
Revised October 26, 1995 Page 4
Effective by Resolution No. _
I . Community Development Department Staff - Actual time spent on land use applications at real time cost rate of $84..00 per hour.
2. Contract Planning Staff - Cost plus 15% ,
3. Code Enforcement Staff - Actual time spent on land use applications and other reimbursable or cost recovery activities at real time cost rate of $69.00/hr.
4. Administrative Services Staff - Actual time on land use applications and other reimbursable or cost recovery activities at real time cost of $82.00/hr,
5. Final cost of processing will be computed upon actual time expended, (based upon the established hourly rates). If final cost is less than the deposit fee received, the unused portion of ;
the deposit fee received, the unused portion of the deposit shall be refunded to the applicant. If final costs is more than the deposit fee received, the balance shall be payable by the
applicant up to 75% of the original deposit. If the cost of processing is expected to be more than the original deposit, plus 75% of said deposit, the City Council may approve the
collection of an additional deposit as they deem appropriate.
FLAT FEE - City Land Use Development Processing Fee for those Flat Fee Items numbered I through 9. The amounts listed below
are "Flat Fees." and cannot be refunded to the applicant should the application be withdrawn.
I .
Zone Clearance
I .
[.a.
Zoning Clearance - Occupancy
I .a.
.5 hours
$42.00
Per lot or unit
I .b.
Zoning Clearance - Tenant Improvements
I .b.
.5 hours
$42.00
I .c.
Zoning Clearance - Construction
I.C.
.5 hours
$42.00
2.
Violation of Conditions of Approval Penalty
2.
see note
100% of Staff tirne for investigation and enforcement.
3.
Sign Permit
3.
.5 hour
$42.00
Per sign
4.
Mobilehome Rent Increase Review (applicable to cost of
living increase reviews only).
4.
3 hours
$252.00
5.
Traffic Model Fee Maintenance
5.
3 hours
$252.00
6.
Home Occupation Permit
6.
1 hour
$84.00
One fee if 2- businesses are filed simultaneously under one
permit. Separate fee for the 2nd business if added after the
original permit is issued.
7.
Permit Adjustment Fee
7.a.
Residential
7.a.
I hour
$84.00
per unit
7.b.
Commercial
7.b.
4 hours
$336.00
per unit
7.c.
Industrial
7.c.
4 hours
$336.00
per unit
8 C
Appeal for Entitlement with deposit or fee less than $500.00
8.
see note
If initial deposit or fee is less than $500.00, the appeal fee is 50% of the initial entitlement
deposit or fee, not to exceed $125.00.
9 4
Postage Fee
9,
see note 1
$1.04 per piece
Fee Chart - Agency Fees Reference
10 1995 REVISED 06SeD95
r4
No.
[Agency or
Single Family
Multi - Family
Mobilehome
Commercial
Industrial
i Development Contribution
Dwelling
Dwelling
Dwelling
Use
Use
I .
Area of Contribution
a. Los Angeles Avenue
a. $2,772
a. $2,772
a. $2,772
a. $15,519 /acre
a. $15,519 /acre
b. S rin Terra Re'ada Roads
b. $3,553
b. $3,553
b. $3,553
b. $19,892 /acre
b. $19,892 /acre
c. Gabbert/Casey Roads
c. $1,560
c. $1,560
c. $1,560
c. $4,940 /acre
c. $4,940 /acre
2.
Art in Public Places - per square foot of building area ($10.00
$ .10 /sq.ft...
$ .10 /sq.ft..
/100 s .ft.
3.
CALLEGUAS Water District - Primary Supplier - Capital
$N 5800
88
$595 or $940
$893().
$2420
(Ordinance No. 14) Effective July 6, 1995
$1,351.00 /per unit
$1,001.00/ per unit
Depending on size
$9,677.00/per
$3,206.00, /per acre
The foregoing per acre rates are average values for the land use
of lot,
acre
classification as shown for a one -story building or structure.
$595 if less
for a(;Iditie
Additionally, buildings or structures of two or more floors will be
than 6,000 sq.ft..
steFies
charged for the total area of these floors, above or below the
ARd
ground floor, at a rate equal to the per acre rate for the land use
s✓ bter-KaneaR
classification.
Aeers.
Residential- Single Units on lots less than 6,000 square feet will
be charged at the Multiple Unit rate. Granny flats will be
charged the Multiple Unit rate.
a. Construction Fee
Special Cases
b. Golf Courses - Double public rate. $9,9Q.
$10,498.00 /per acre
C. Greenbelt - $4,4�6./peFacre $5,249.00
d. Car Wash, Laundromat $1.34 per gallons per day
e. Public $4,44 $5,249.00./ per acre
4.
City Services
a. Planning - Resolution No. 93.987
a. See Resolution
a. See Resolution
a. See Resolution
a. See Resolution
a. See Resolution
5.
b. City Attorney - July 1993 - $135.00 $140.00/170
b. See Resolution
b. See Resolution
b. See Resolution
b. See Resolution
b. See Resolution
6.
c. City Engineer - Resolution No. 92 -865
c. See Resolution
c. See Resolution
c. See Resolution
c. See Resolution
c. See Resolution
7,
d. Public Works - Resolution No. 92 -865
d. See Resolution
d. See Resolution
d. See Resolution
d. See Resolution
d. See Resolution
8.
e. Police - Resolution No. 92.921
e. See Resolution
e. See Resolution
e. See Resolution
e. See Resolution
e. See Resolution
9.
Citywide Traffic Mitigation
Per dwelling unit.
Per dwelling unit.
Per dwelling unit.
Based on use.
Based on use.
Fund - Driven by land use traffic peneration rates.
10.
Fire Protection Facilities Fee -
$232.51 /dwelling
$170.95 /dwelling
$139.07 /dwelling
$ . I I / sq.ft.. of
floor
$ .1 1 / sq.ft.. of
floor ar1a.
Facilities Ordinance, County of Ventura Division of Building &
gross area.
gross
Safe ty. (by City of Moorpark Resolution No. 92 -894
$87 �
$8?� Q- �
Qa %�
QQ %5
$$75 $ 4-,
12.
Flood Control - Land Development Fee (per unit - can vary
$573. /per dwelling
$573. /per dwelling
$573. /per dwelling
$2,292. /acre
$2,292./acrC;
depending upon location.) Threshold Amount $5730..00
Effective I /I /95
13.
Guarantees - Required for improvements.
14.a.
Landscape Review - $697.90 $672.00 per development.
NA
NA
NA
Ordinance No. 102 and Resolution No. 88 -524
14.b.
Tree & Landscape Fee
.05 /gross floor
.05 p /gross floor
area.
area.
15.
Lighting - First Year Developer Expense. Future years
I st yr. developer
I st yr. developer
I st yr. developer
I st yr. developer
I st yr. developer
expense.
expense.
expense.
expense.
expense.
16.
Park Fees
a. Based on
a. Based on current
a. Based on
b.$ .25 /sq.ft..
b. $ .25 /sq.ft..
a. Residential (Quimby) Park Fee - 5 acres /1,000 persons or an
current market.
market
current market.
gross floor area.
gross floor area.
in -lieu fee Ordinance No. 6
b. Commercial & Industrial Park Fee
17.
School - Per dwelling unit or sq.ft.. of gross floor area.
$1 .72 / sq.ft.. gross
$1 .72 / sq.ft.. gross
$1.72 /sq.ft.. gross
$ .28 / sq.ft.. gross
$ .28 / sq.ft.. gross
floor area.
floor area.
floor area.
floor area.
floor area.
18.
Sewer
$2,500 /dwelling
$2,000 /dwelling
$2,000 /dwelling
Based on
Based on plumbing
plumbing
fixtures.
fixtures.
19.
Sheriffs Facilities Fee -
$83.58 /dwelling
$54.16
$55.54
$ .05 /sq.ft..
$ .05 /sq.ft..
Sheriff & Fire Protection District
/dwelling
/dwelling
gross floor area.
gross floor area.
Facilities Ordinance, County of Ventura Division of Building &
Safe ty. (by City of Moorpark Resolution No. 92 -894
20.
Traffic System Management - Based upon Air Quality impacts &
need for mitigation.
21. CR
Waterworks District No. I (Secondary Supplier)
$634 $1510.00 /
$634 $1510.00 /
$6- 34$1510.00 /
$2 2 $5285.00
$2,,549 $5436.00
dwelling
dwelling
dwelling
/acre
/acre
4