Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2000 0301 RDA REG'( ESTABLISHED �•` * ( wAGN 1ML gat # r OF ANNOTATED MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MARCH 1, 2000 6:30 P.M. Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue 1. CALL TO ORDER: 7:06 P.M. 2. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: AGENCY MEMBERS EVANS, HARPER, RODGERS, WOZNIAK AND CHAIR HUNTER. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT: NONE. 4. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider a Report on the Disposition and Development Agreement with Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff to return at the April 5, 2000, Agency meeting with a status report on Disposition and Development Agreement with Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation. CONTINUED TO APRIL 5, 2000 MEETING. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Redevelopment Agency Meeting of January 5, 2000. Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as processed. APPROVED. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: (continued) Redevelopment Agency Agenda March 1, 2000 Page 2 B. Consider Resolution No. 2000 -91, Amending the FY 1999/2000 Operating Budget. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2000 -91 amending the Operating and Capital Improvements Budgets for the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency for the Fiscal Year 1999/2000. (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED). APPROVED STAFF RECOMMENDATION, INCLUDING ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -91. C. Consider Issuance of a Downtown Developer Request for Qualifications. Staff Recommendation: Approve issuance of the Downtown Developer Request for Qualifications as presented in the staff report. APPROVED STAFF RECOMMENDATION. 6. CLOSED SESSION: A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: 285 High Street, Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, Executive Director Negotiating Parties: The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark and Randall - Tracy Marsh Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment Property: 555 Spring Road, Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, Executive Director Negotiating Parties: The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark and F. L. Pederson Testamentary Trust Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of payment Property: 297 High Street, Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, Executive Director Negotiating Parties: The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark and Randall - Tracy E. Marsh Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment Property: 309 Charles Street, Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, Executive Director Negotiating Parties: The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark and Herman B. and Maria T. A. Ramirez Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment 6. CLOSED SESSION: (continued) Redevelopment Agency Agenda March 1, 2000 Page 3 Property: 389 Charles Street, Moorpark, CA 93021 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, Executive Director Negotiating Parties: The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark and Thomas G. Kiernan Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment 7. ADJOURNMENT: 9:50 P.M. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss CITY OF MOORPARK AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, La-Dell VanDeren, declare as follows : That I am the Deputy City Clerk of the City of Moorpark and that a notice for a Regular meeting of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency to be held March 1, 2000, at 6 : 30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark Community Center, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, was posted on February 25, 2000, at a conspicuous place at the Moorpark Community Center, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct . Executed on February 25 , 2000 . La-Dell VanDeren, Deputy City Clerk MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENDA REPORT TTEM� t*. CITY OF Vx00R.PAR_K, CALIFORNIA City Co:anca3INfeetang of g=h IA &M AGENCY BY: TO: Honorable Agency Board of Directors FROM: John E. Nowak, Assistant Executive Director 'qex) DATE: 22 February 2000 (Agency Meeting of 03- 01 -00) SUBJECT: Consider a Report on the Disposition and Development Agreement with Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation. BACKGROUND: In July 1998 the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) with Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation (CEDC) for the construction of 58 homes on the Gisler Field site. Fifteen (15) of those single- family residential units are to be affordable for low and very low- income households. The DDA also contained a schedule of performance with milestones of actions. DISCUSSION: On July 8, 1998 the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency entered into a DDA with CEDC to construct fifty -nine (59) single family detached residential units, of which four (4) are to be affordable for very -low income households and eleven (11) are to be affordable for low income households. The DDA included a "Schedule of Performance" which CEDC was required to follow. On February 17, 1999 the Schedule was amended to extend the time periods for various actions to be performed. On October 19, that it was i separate letter actions that wex 1999 CEDC was Z default of on the same e required in sent a letter the required date advised October 1999. notifying them schedule. A CEDC of other rtrI,I Report on DDA Meeting of 01 March 2000 Page 02 On November 3 a letter was received from CEDC's lender containing a Subordination Agreement for the DDA and the Agency's interest in the land. On November 6, 1999 a letter was received from CEDC responding to the October 19 letters and contained a Promissory Note for the Agency's review. On December 7, 1999 the Escrow Company submitted escrow instructions for the land transfer. A response was sent to CEDC on December 8, 1999 providing staff's concerns related to the escrow instructions, title insurance, subordination agreement and promissory note. The outstanding issues are as follows: 1. CEDC's lender has wanted to subordinate the DDA to the loan, meaning that if there were a foreclosure, the requirement for affordable units through the year 2032 would be void. They were told this was completely unacceptable to the Agency. Staff has been told this is no longer an issue but has not seen any written indication of such from the lender. 2. Proof of financing on the project was to have been submitted in September 1999. As of the date of this report preparation, no proof has been submitted. Financial projections prepared by CEDC showing how funding for the project will be covered were provided on February 23. 3. CEDC indicated on February 18 for the first time that they do not have funding for the complete project, only for phase one, yet CEDC wants all of the land to be deeded to them at once. They are planning to obtain financing in phases to match the construction. This gives the Agency no assurance that monies would be available for the second or third phase of the project. 4. The Agency has not received any copies of executed construction contract documents for the project, which were due October 1999. CEDC now indicates that they will serve as general contractor and sub out all of the work. Contracts with the subs have not been presented for the Agency's review for compliance with the DDA requirements. 000002 Report on DDA Meeting of 01 March 2000 Page 03 5. The Promissory Note was provided in November (due in October 1999). Required corrections were submitted by staff to CEDC on December 8. No corrected document has been returned for staff review. 6. Per the DDA the final map is to be recorded in March 2000. Staff has not received for review a copy of the language for restrictions to be placed on each parcel when the map is filed. All parcels are to have a restriction prohibiting close of escrow until the Agency has affirmed all fees have been paid. The affordable units are to contain an additional deed restriction binding the units for purchase or lease to qualified households until the year 2032. Other deed restriction language is also required by the DDA. A draft of a proposed Resale Restrictions Agreement was provided on February 23 but not reviewed at the time of preparation of this report. 7. CEDC indicated on February 18 that the number of units to be constructed in each phase has changed from that indicated during preparation of the DDA. No written description of the change has been provided to the Agency. 8. All building and other plans were to have been completed in October 1999. They are still in plan check for corrections. Final approvals are anticipated in a few weeks. 9. No progress report has been provided on addressing the additional right -of -way required for the street to be constructed from Poindexter Avenue into the project and park. Staff has not provided any information to escrow due to problems with the language in the escrow instructions, title insurance, subordination agreement and promissory note. No revised documents have been provided to the Agency since the letter indicating the problems was mailed on December 8. 000000.3 Report on DDA Meeting of 01 March 2000 Page 04 Pursuant to the DDA Schedule of Performance, escrow is to close in April 2000 and construction to begin that month. Absent receipt of the documents with corrected language for staff's review, no action on the escrow will take place. This will impact the ability for construction to begin on schedule. Also, CEDC has indicated it wants to import soil to the site at this time. The DDA allows the importation under certain conditions. Until not only those conditions are met, but also all other requirements of the DDA are brought to a current schedule, it is proposed no approval be granted. The DDA provides for penalties to be assessed if the Schedule of Performance is not adhered to and delays not cured within a specified time. Currently a number of items are up to four (4) months late. The DDA with CEDC will need continued monitoring to assure all conditions of the DDA are met and the Agency's interests are protected before any permits are issued. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to return at the April 5 Agency meeting with a status report on DDA with Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation. 000004 MAR -01 -2000 WED 05:13 PM CABRILLO ECONOMIC FAX NO. 8056593195 P. 01 &"' _-L-_7E-MN �4' f4 CE� Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation 11 011 Azahar Street, Saticoy, California 93004 (805) 659 -3791 Fax(805)659,3195 EOF IN Of^OI SE, LCS rnCSMENT CA',hDJ.SADCDf A Ana,Acr1 CoMln]rcl.1 rink VICI' Pri: SlrE N r I,G,rtL A Uhn/lL Gir!rurot, Rrpn+t.o.+Si+4�4 Aari::.t I is n.h slim 11 oI1 -Y March 1, 2000 THFA,w;rr, Chairperson Patrick Hunter XFNNrN R.IArkIDETN Honorable Agency Board of Directors RFMFCOWO ,Development e, "�`wdP° °Ire Moorpark Redevelopment Agency SCCRCTArN S46Trs"ACAFMC'NRODntGUE! 799 Moorpark Avenue SI Jntir.:+ G +�•rYtelly O;tl:ulfh Moorpark, CA 93021 Oc..nd MAR C 1 2000 CITY C��r ; ;'S Df"," .; R7.'ii :NT CITY 01F lriV; ,�ift:L i� Cc,V.ArD uL CASTIL0 rn.l,n;noColro,t.a.aon RE: Agenda Item 4.A. Agency Meeting of March 1, 2000 filly 01 0Ynaro Report on the Disposition and Agreement with CEDC RFMFCOWO ,Development rr,;-m, vuly Avrwient'+1m C.:r1 t.1: i14 Dear Chairperson Hunter and Agency Members: rlatArornANCls All-Only 0141C eynnt_es Ms. Karen Flock acting Executive Director, and I are unable to attend Cnntnultt.'y nGlacoont,tbw i r'' :"'W tonight's Moorpark Redevelopment Agency meeting for professional and 4 SICAmunnAY ean.,n.tnryn peo:nn4invo personal reasons, respectively. We regret these present circumstances Mnrll9fkntny Oaks Cntnlnunc(y N01119 In Oa because we look forward to any and all opportunities to meet with you, nrANA.P.pIng individually and collectively. We are especially anxious to provide you rol�Arl la•,.�tna R.•.�du with up- to- the - minute information on our progress that goes well beyond 14ii•1I,"7QICRTrL n that which is presented in your staff report. Also, we would like to offer Newt. rugTr.� I1urA Cine.lruclut; suggestions on the continued oversight of the Disposition and GollowlAJOUr.N�T Development Agreement in light of the imminent departure of Mr. John CannWtuty napro[,ontaUve (3. %IfQ Nowak, Assistant Executive Director. VArRVARA MACI11•01TZ rt:amnl Cour- Ga l4A'+' t�ti,cnc A!•F ^.,�, Therefore, and noting that staff recommends this item be placed on your ntcJwwouI1 iar April 5 "' Agency meeting, Ms. Flock and /or I will be calling to arrange scLL'trr+nra+ t M(II +�: A', ZAM14TA individual meetings with Agency members prior to that or any urry " "° subsequently scheduled meeting. If you have any questions on specific rxs ^wrdt:D EcTm items, please call us at 805.659.3791. no�wtY E.rEfd:�NOCL Sincerely, Bernardo M. Perez Project Manager C No+ Fo tct r I+r,� rY ttu Het9hborWorksa �� W A U>"ICd YAy l.yINtCY MAR 01 100 17:39 9056593195 PAGE.01 ITEM 507. 8, No CITY OF M- OORPAR1K, CAGIFORNU City Council Meeting of , greh /, o?ODD ACTIOIti:.�T�OI�PG1���� nr(u l 4 ti-- -nn�,f M,6 AM, MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY daA AGENDA REPORT BY: TO: Honorable Agency Board of Directors FROM: John E. Nowak, Assistant Executive Director DATE: 22 February 2000 (Agency Meeting of 03- 01 -00) SUBJECT: Consider Resolution No. 2000 -_ Amending the FY 1999/2000 Operating Budget BACKGROUND: The Redevelopment Agency adopted a budget for Fiscal Year 1999/2000 on June 23, 1999. Subsequent to that action the Board has approved amendments to the Agency budget and other changes are proposed following a mid -year review of revenues and expenditures. An amendment to the adopted budget to reflect the changes is proposed. DISCUSSION: Details on the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency's mid -year budget review are contained in the staff report to the City Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED) Adopt Resolution No. 2000- amending the Operating and Capital Improvements Budgets for the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency for the Fiscal Year 1999/2000. Attached: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGETS FOR THE MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000 WHEREAS, on June 23, 1999 the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors adopted an Operating and Capital Improvements Budget for Fiscal Year 1999 -2000; and WHEREAS, certain expenditures that were not completed were carried over from the prior fiscal year and the Agency Board has adopted certain amendments to the FY 99/00 budget since its adoption; and WHEREAS, certain additions and adjustments to the budget are proposed to allow for effective service delivery for the balance of the current fiscal year; and WHEREAS, as the result of the reviews and analysis, expenditure proposals and revenue projections based on mid- year figures have been presented for the Agency Board's consideration. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Operating and Capital Improvements Budget for Fiscal Year 1999 -2000 is hereby amended to contain those additions and adjustments contained in Exhibit "A" hereto. SECTION 2. The Agency Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original Resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1St day of March 2000. Patrick Hunter, Chair ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Secretary Exhibit "A" 000008 Resolution 2000 - Exhibit "A" Mid -year Budget Adjustments 6�0 9�v 000009 i I Revised 1 Current Budget Fund 1 (Division Object � Budget � Change Amount 2901 5420 9103 $01 $9,2001 $9,200 2901 j 5420 9824 1 $105,4001 - $35,400, 870,000 2901 5420 i 9825 $50,0001 $14, 000 $64, 000 2902 5410 -._1. 9104 $5,0001 $10,0001 - - $15,000 2902 5410 9298 1 $17,7621 $2001 $17,962 2902 5410 9498 $2,5981 $6651 $3,263 2902 , 5410_ 9503 1 $2,6501 $850* $3,500 2902 5410 9824 -i $421,6001 - $141,600 $280,000 2902 5410 j 9825 i $200,0001 $56,000 $256,000 3900 5410 9720 $421, 600, =$106, 600' $315, 000 3900 5410 9730 - $200,000, $56,000, $256,000 3900 5420 9720 $105,400 = $26,400, $79,000 3900 5420 9730 T $50,0001 - $14'0001 $64,000 Check totals $1,582,010 - $149,085, $1,432,925 6�0 9�v 000009 ITEM'6,0- c NOFFNIMM CITY OF M- 0011 ARK, CALWORNIA city Council Meeting of y&�r_ ,2h 1, A040 ACTION: A._.T�=�l.�(�sC'�ff rP� MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BY. AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable Agency Board FROM: Graham Mitchell, Senior Management Analyst DATE: February 18, 2000 (MRA Meeting of 3/1/00) SUBJECT: Consider Issuance of a Downtown Developer Request for Qualifications Background At its January 19, 2000 meeting, the Agency Board received the Downtown Revitalization Study prepared by Katz Hollis and directed the preparation of a Downtown Developer Request for Qualifications (RFQ). Staff presents to the Agency Board the attached RFQ to be considered for issuance. Discussion In an effort to facilitate revitalization in the downtown, the Downtown Revitalization Study recommends the issuance of a Request for Qualifications. Concurring with this recommendation, the Agency Board at its January 19th meeting, requested that the Council's Economic Development Committee develop a RFQ. At its February meeting, the Committee considered major points to be included in the RFQ. The attached RFQ reflects the Committee's recommendations, including insertion of a section addressing possible Agency incentives. 000010 The Honorable Agency Board February 18, 2000 Page 2 The RFQ's objective is to solicit interest from developers for the Agency -owned property on High Street. Issuing the RFQ is a first step in finding and selecting a developer who is qualified to initiate, and undertake to completion, development in the downtown. Depending on the responses from the RFQ, the Agency may wish to issue a formal Request for Proposals to qualified firms or directly begin negotiating with a developer. The RFQ responses will be due to the Agency by April 5, 2000 and initially reviewed by the Economic Development Committee at its April 11th meeting. Staff Recommendation That the Agency Board approve issuance of the Downtown Developer Request for Qualifications as presented in the staff report. Attachment: Downtown Developer Request for Qualifications 00001i CITY OF MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPER March 3, 2000 00001-1.2 This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is made up of four sections: General Information, Description of the Site /Project Concept, Information Requested, and Submittal Form. The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency encourages development firms to read the RFQ and respond by submitting its qualifications. SECTION 1 GENERAL INFORMATION 01.01 PURPOSE The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency (Agency) releases this Request for Qualifications to firms interested in developing all or a portion of a 2.34 acre Agency -owned parcel for commercial, retail, and /or office uses. The intent for releasing the RFQ is to identify qualified firms interested in pursing this opportunity. 01.02 ISSUING OFFICE The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency releases this RFQ. All contact pertaining to this RFQ shall be directed to: Graham Mitchell Senior Management Analyst Moorpark Redevelopment Agency 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 (805) 529 -6864, ext. 217 01.03 COSTS INCURRED The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency assumes no responsibility for any costs incurred by a firm in the preparation of a response to this RFQ. 01.04 SUBMITTING QUALIFICATIONS To be considered to receive a formal Request for Proposals to develop the Agency -owned Downtown parcel, respondents must provide the specific information requested in Section 3 and must return a submittal form as contained in Section 4. All responses and supporting materials become property of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency upon its receipt by the Agency. 000010", G mitchel VDowntown /R FQ- Developers 01.05 RESPONSE DATE The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency requires that responses be submitted by 4:00 P.M. on Wednesday, April 5, 2000. Submit responses to: Graham Mitchell Senior Management Analyst Moorpark Redevelopment Agency 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Submittals must be sealed and must clearly state on the outside of the package or envelop: RFQ Response — Downtown Development. The Agency assumes no responsibility for errors or delays by public or private carriers in delivering proposals. 01.06 CITY HALL HOURS For the purpose of inquiry or delivery of responses, the Moorpark City Hall is open to the public from 8:30 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. each weekday, excluding holidays. 01.07 INFORMAL SOLICITATION This RFQ is issued as an informal solicitation and in no way obligates the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency. 01.08 CRITERIA TO REVIEW RESPONSES The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency will review qualifications of the firms to determine which firm(s) will participate in a Request for Proposal solicitation. Firms will be evaluated on their experience with similar development projects, recommendations from other professionals, and an ability to present creative development proposals. o00014 GmitchelVDowntown /RFQ- Developers 2 SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE /PROJECT CONCEPT 02.01 SITE DESCRIPTION The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency owns a 2.34 acre parcel (APN 512 -0- 090 -105) in Downtown Moorpark (see attached maps). Situated on the south side of High Street, this long and narrow parcel (1,019 feet by 100 feet) is bordered on the west by Moorpark Avenue, on the east by a Metrolink lot, and on the south by railroad tracks. The parcel currently has six tenants (all on month -to -month leases with the Agency) spread throughout the parcel in various buildings. 02.02 REGIONAL CONTEXT The City of Moorpark is located in the southeastern region of Ventura County, fifty miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. Moorpark is ranked the safest city in Ventura County and has a median household income of $73,710. Cities surrounding Moorpark that make up its subregional market area include Thousand Oaks and Simi Valley. Within a ten mile radius of Downtown Moorpark, there are 315,398 people and 103,320 households. Downtown Moorpark is the only traditional downtown in the subregional market area. Moorpark's commercial downtown corridor consists of two major streets —High Street and Moorpark Avenue. In addition to the existing residential neighborhoods surrounding the commercial area, there are 843 homes approved to be developed and 954 homes in the planning process that will flank the Downtown. 02.03 PROJECT CONCEPT A recent Downtown Revitalization Study suggests a possible mix of both retail and office uses on the Agency -owned parcel. The Agency encourages the reuse of existing prominent buildings on the parcel —such as the granary building. The Agency may also consider expanding the development project beyond its parcel to other areas of High Street. The Agency is open to development proposals provided that Downtown Specific Plan guidelines are met. Upon request, the Downtown Revitalization Study and Downtown Specific Plan are available for $21 and $12, respectively. 02.04 INCENTIVES The Agency has made the revitalization of Downtown Moorpark a high priority. The Agency is willing to discuss incentives to facilitate development on its parcel. Generally, these incentives may include land or lease write downs, parking requirement reductions, capital improvements, and streamlined processing. Specific assistance will depend on the proposed development presented. 0000.: GmitchelVDowntown /RFQ- Developers 3 SECTION 3 INFORMATION REQUESTED 03.01 SPECIFIC INFORMATION REQUESTED In addition to the submittal form in Section 4, the response should include the following information: FIRM QUALIFICATIONS a) Identify principal members of the firm and their experience b) Identify corporate partners and provide their experience FIRM EXPERIENCE (provide information on as many projects as possible) a) Describe the firm's experience in downtown development projects, including specific businesses brought into a downtown development b) Describe the firm's experience in revitalization projects c) Describe the firm's experience in other development projects REFERENCES a) List at least three (3) California municipal references b) List other professional references 03.02 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS The Agency requests that respondents provide general development concepts envisioned for the Agency -owned parcel and other areas of the Downtown. These should include both written descriptions and basic site plans. The examples will be used to assess the respondent's ability and creativity. 000016 Gmitchell /Downtown /RFQ- Developers 4 SECTION 4 SUBMITTAL FORM Downtown Developer RFQ NAME OF ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: () FACSIMILE: �) CONTACT PERSON: STAFF ASSIGNED: SIGNATURE: TITLE: DATE: GmitchelVDowntown /RFQ - Developers 5 City of Moorpark Regional Map �J ©1997 by Rand McNally & Company. All rights reserved. Downtown Moorpark �a c--, YI77,'C ©1997 by Rand McNally & Company. All rights reserved. Everett St ® r!►. SOUMERN PACIFIC RAILROAD •�.'`A �� F. • . •V� ©1997 by Rand McNally & Company. All rights reserved. Moorpark Redevelopment Agency's Downtown Parcel 0 006 c 07 I L STREET Cli 05 11 r�l III STREET 2.34 Ac. P R.R. 5"-0 _-03 62AR F C1 Q) I I4 I i F z. HWY. H8 CHARLES (D 02 -7 U) r D 17 091 C) 3 2 0 1 C14 32 HIGH Cli 05 11 r�l III STREET 2.34 Ac. P R.R. 5"-0 _-03 62AR F C1 Q) I I4 I i F z. HWY. H8