HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2003 0205 RDA REGJ ESTABLISHED
* NAM 11.1287
�`�LtFO�N�a
ly OF
Resolution No. 2003 -110
MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2003
6:30 P.M.
Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. ROLL CALL:
3. PUBLIC COMMENT:
4. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
A. Consider a Resolution Adopting the Replacement Housing
Plan for the High Street Project. Staff Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution No. 2003- (Continued from January
15, 2003.) (Staff: Nancy Burns)
B. Consider Approval of Agreement for Consulting Services
with Urban Futures Inc., to Prepare a Mid -term Update of
the Agency's 1999 -2004 Implementation Plan. Staff
Recommendation: Approve agreement with Urban Futures Inc.
and authorize the Executive Director to sign the agreement
and related documents. (Staff: Hugh Riley)
5. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of
December 18, 2002.
Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of Januar
15, 2003.
Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes.
Redevelopment Agency Agenda
February 5, 2003
Page 2
6. CLOSED SESSION:
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision
(b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of
cases to be discussed - 4)
B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c) of
Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases
to be discussed - 4)
C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9)
Mission Bell Plaza Phase II, LLC, a California limited
partnership vs. Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Moorpark (Case No. SCO28906)
7. ADJOURNMENT:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
Any member of the public may address the Agency during the Public Comments portion
of the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or a Presentation /Action /Discussion
item. Speakers who wish to address the Agency concerning a Public Hearing or
Presentations /Action/ Discussion item must do so during the Public Hearing or
Presentations /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker
cards muse be received by the City Clerk for Public Comments prior to the
beginning of the Public Comments portion of the meeting and for
Presentation /Action /Discussion items prior to the beginning of the first item of
the Presentation /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda. Speaker Cards for a
Public Hearing must be received prior to the beginning of the Public Hearing. A
limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Comment and
Presentation /Action /Discussion item speaker. A limitation of three to five minutes
shall be imposed upon each Public Hearing item speaker. Written Statement Cards
may be submitted in lieu of speaking orally for open Public Hearings and
Presentation /Action /Discussion items. Copies of each .item of business on the
agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public
review. Any questions concerning any agenda item may be directed to the City Clerk
at (805) 517 -6223.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk s Department at (805)
517 -6223. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make
reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102-
35.104 ADA Title II).
CITY OF 1*10ORPARK, CALIFORNIA
Redevelopment Agency Meeting
of 2 !D tlav -y � ),003
ACTION: recommend
pe�olu4ic1� '(l�• � b�� -110
MOORPARK REDEVELOMENT AGENCIYY-
AGENDA REPORT
To: Honorable Agency Board of Directors
From: Nancy Burns, Senior Management Analyst
Date: January 23, 2003 (MRA Board Mtg. February 5, 2003)
Subject: CONSIDER RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE REPLACEMENT
HOUSING PLAN for the HIGH STREET PROJECT
BACKGROUND
This item was presented to the Agency Board at its January 15,
2003, Regular Meeting. Staff was directed to revise Tables 3
and 4 of the Replacement Housing Plan and continue the item to
the Agency's February 5, 2003, meeting.
DISCUSSION
Table 3 has been reformulated into two (2) tables. Table 3a
shows the number of affordable dwelling units and bedrooms in
existing projects, and Table 3b shows the number of affordable
dwelling units and bedrooms that have been recently constructed
and those which are to be provided in projects that are
anticipated within the next four (4) years. Table 3a is
provided for information only, and reflects the current
inventory of affordable units within the City.
As shown in Table 4, the Agency's replacement housing obligation
is satisfied by the units that have recently been constructed or
are projected to be built within the next four (4) years.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -
'< �01C "
Honorable Agency Board
Date 01/23/03
Page 2
Exhibits: Resolution No. 2003 -
Replacement Housing Plan for the High Street Project
Agenda Report from Agency Meeting of January 15, 2003
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT
THE REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN FOR THE HIGH
STREET PROJECT
WHEREAS, on September 19, 2001, the Moorpark Redevelopment
Agency acquired the Moorpark Mobilehome Park by negotiated
agreement with the former owner; and
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on March 20,
2002, the Relocation Plan for the High Street Project was
adopted to guide the provision of relocation benefits and
services to the residents of Moorpark Mobilehome Park and three
tenant households on nearby parcels; and
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2001, the Moorpark Redevelopment
Agency acquired the property at 213 East Los Angeles Avenue by
negotiated agreement with the former owner; and
WHEREAS, a Relocation Plan for 213 East Los Angeles Avenue
was adopted by the Agency on January 15, 2003.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Agency commits to satisfying any
replacement housing needs created by the High Street Project and
the 213 East Los Angeles Avenue Project that affect the housing
market for low and moderate income households.
SECTION 2. The Agency finds that no replacement housing
identified in the Replacement Housing Plan requires voter
approval under Article 34.
SECTION 3. The Agency finds that the Replacement Housing
r the High Street Project includes consideration of the
impacts of both the High Street Relocation Project and
East Los Angeles Avenue Project.
Plan fo
housing
the 213
SECTION 4. The Agency hereby adopts the Replacement
Housing Plan for the High Street Project.
j0000
Resolution No. 2003 -
Page 2
SECTION 5. The Agency Secretary shall certify to the
adoption
resolution
of this resolution and shall cause a certified
to be filed in the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of February 2003.
Patrick Hunter, Chair
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Agency Secretary
Attachment:
Exhibit "A" Replacement Housing Plan for the High Street Project
REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN
for the
High Street Project
Prepared for
MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
iA
PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS
100 WEST BROADWAY, SUITE 300
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90802
(562) 590 -8564
January 2003
O'c"110
I. INTRODUCTION ............................ ..............................I
11. PROJECT LOCATION ....................... ............................... 3
III. UNITS TO BE REPLACED .......... . ......................... . ............ 5
IV. ANNUAL INCOME RESTRICTIONS .......... ............................... 7
V. LOCATION OF REPLACEMENT HOUSING .... ............................... 8
VI. FINANCING THE REPLACEMENT HOUSING ............................... 11
VII. NON - APPLICABILITY OF ARTICLE XXXIV OF
THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ...... ............................... 11
VIII. TIME TABLE FOR REPLACEMENT HOUSING ............................. 12
IX. SUMMARY .............................. ............................... 12
The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency ") has purchased the mobile home park
located at 83 High Street, in the City of Moorpark, with the intent to further develop the Moorpark
Civic Center. In addition, the City intends to initiate negotiations for the purchase of a single family
residence with two dwellings that is contiguous to the park, for the expansion of the Civic Center.
A third and fourth parcel, which are already owned by the Agency, will be incorporated into this
project. Each of these parcels, 213 E. Los Angeles Avenue and 661 Moorpark Avenue, has a single
family residence.
The real property that has been or will be acquired will cause the permanent displacement of thirty -
two (32) residential households. The mobile home park, with twenty- eight(28) mobile homes, of
which twenty- four(24) are owner occupied. Of the four single family residences, all are tenant
occupied.
This represents the maximum number of parcels and households that may be impacted by the
Project. The acquisition and relocation components of the Project are expected to take place over
a twelve month period that began in April of this year.
Section 33413.5 of the California Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et
seq.) requires a redevelopment agency to adopt a replacement housing plan whenever the agency
executes an agreement for acquisition of real property, or an agreement for the disposition and
development of property which would lead to the destruction or removal of dwelling units from the
low and moderate income housing market. The plan should identify the impacts that a particular
redevelopment project will have on the community's supply of low and moderate income housing
and detail the measures that the agency will take to ensure that the appropriate replacement housing
is produced within the four year time limit. Agencies have two options for producing replacement
housing pursuant to Sections 33413(a) or 33413(f) of the California Redevelopment Law.
Section 33413(a) of the California Redevelopment Law requires that whenever dwelling units
housing persons and families of low or moderate income are destroyed or removed from the low and
moderate income housing market as part of a redevelopment project, which is subject to a written
agreement with a redevelopment agency or where financial assistance has been provided, the agency
shall within four (4) years of the destruction or removal; rehabilitate, develop, or construct, or cause
to be rehabilitated, developed, or constructed, for rental or sale to persons and families of low or
moderate income, an equal number of replacement dwelling units at affordable housing cost within
the redevelopment project area or within the territorial jurisdiction of the agency. Because the
dwelling units will be removed after January 1, 2002, one hundred percent (100 %) of the
replacement dwelling units shall be available at affordable housing cost to, and occupied by, persons
in the same or a lower income category (very low, low and moderate) as the persons displaced from
those destroyed or removed units.
REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN PAGE 1
0000107
Notwithstanding Section 33413(a), Section 33413(f), states that an Agency may replace destroyed
or removed dwelling units with fewer number of replacement dwelling units if the replacement units
meet both of the following criteria: (1) the total number of bedrooms in the replacement dwelling
units equals or exceeds the number of bedrooms in the destroyed or removed units, and (2) the
replacement units are affordable to the same income level of the households as the destroyed or
removed units.
The replacement units are to remain available at affordable housing costs to very low, low and
moderate income households, respectively for the longest feasible time, but not less than 55 years
for rental units and 45 years for owner occupied units pursuant to Health & Safety Code §33413(c).
The units in the High Street Project are anticipated to be removed by the Spring of 2003 and the
replacement units must be provided within four years of the removal date. Therefore, all replacement
units must be completed by the Spring of 2007.
This Replacement Housing Plan (the "Plan ") has been prepared by the Agency as a result of
proposed redevelopment of property located in the Project and to satisfy the requirements for
replacement housing contemplated under the California Redevelopment Law.
This Plan describes the following:
1) Proposed project,
2) General location and number of the very-low, low and moderate income dwelling units
which will, or may be, removed or destroyed as a result of the project,
3) General location and number of replacement dwelling units planned for construction and /or
rehabilitation,
4) Means of financing such development,
5) Schedule for the construction of the replacement housing,
6) Period for which these units will remain affordable, and
7) A finding that the replacement housing does not require approval of the voters pursuant to
Article XXXIV of the California Constitution
RFiPLACEMEN "r HOUSING PLAN PAGE. 2
0001 0 ° () 8
II. PROJECT LOCATION rx
The Project is generally located in the City of Moorpark, County of Ventura directly west of
Moorpark Avenue and north of High Street. The subject properties are contiguous to the Moorpark
Civic Center. On the following pages please find:
Figure 1 - Regional Project Setting, and
Figure 2 -High Street Project and L.A. Avenue Site Locations.
REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN PAGE 3
0 0 C
i
i
.. C s ft -
• PROJECT SITE \ - EVlRl TTQ4 li y
r,m k ur a
� � rar U�TDTMr i rircw
i a1RIl0 S g I .._ RUTH o
TLW
vl�owR Z 8 zRO 3
9 f ROBIRTS
EETUEA -...
EVERlET - --
3 MNEETic
Figure 2: Project Site Location
REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN PAGE 4
0 () () C.�
Survey of Dwellings Units to be Removed
A door to door survey and interviews of the occupants residing in potentially destroyed dwellings
were conducted from October 2001 through January 2002, and August 2002. In addition,
information obtained from publically available sources and property appraisals was reviewed and
analyzed. Information obtained from these sources was used to determine the number of bedrooms
and gross household income for each displaced dwelling unit.
Replacement Housing Requirements
Per the California Redevelopment Law as discussed in Section I - Introduction, the Agency shall
make available 100 percent (100°/x) of the replacement dwelling units at affordable housing cost to,
and occupied by, persons in the same or a lower income category (very low, low and moderate) as
the persons displaced from those destroyed or removed units.
Table 1, below, defines the number of dwelling_ units, with corresponding number of bedrooms, that
will be displaced and the 100% requirement for replacement dwelling units and number of bedrooms
by income level. The numbers under each household income category indicate the total households
displaced (the number of dwelling units) by dwelling unit size (the number of bedrooms).
For this Project, the thirty-two (32) households were found to have the following mix of dwelling
unit sizes categorized by the number of bedrooms: twenty -two (22) one - bedroom, seven (7) two -
bedroom, two (2) three bedroom and one (1) four- bedroom. In addition, the survey found twenty
(20) very low, seven (7) low, and five (5) moderate income families residing in the thirty -two
dwelling units.
The results suggest that 46 replacement bedrooms need to be rehabilitated, developed, or constructed
pursuant to Section 33413(a) of the Community Redevelopment Law. Based on the criteria of
replacing all bedrooms by income level, twenty (24) replacement bedrooms should be affordable to
very low- income households, twelve (12) replacement bedrooms should be affordable to low - income
households, and ten (10) bedrooms should be affordable to moderate- income households. These
bedrooms may be constructed with a fewer number of dwelling units as long as the total number of
bedrooms are in the same or a lower income category.
RiTLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN pvc,410. R9
Two Bedroom I 2/(4) I 3/(6) 1 2/(4) II 0/(0) II
7/(14)
Three Bedroom 11(3) 11(3) 0/(0) 0/(0) 2/(6)
Four Bedroom - - 1/(4) - 1/(4)
Total Dwellings & 20/(24) 7/(12) 5/(10) 0/(0) 32/(46)
Bedrooms Displaced
* Values, in. pare nthesis indicate the number of bedrooms that are displaced,'
** Above'Moderate Income dwelling units and /or bedrooms do not need to be replaced. Values assigned
are not included in theTotals.
REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN P G 6
�6C.G,I.
California Health and Safety Code Sections 50079.5 and 50105 provide that the moderate, low and
very-low income limits established by the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
( "HUD ") are the state limits for those income categories. Sections 50079.5 and 50105 direct the
Department of Housing and Community Development ( "HCD ") to publish the income limits.
The following figures, shown in Table 2, are approved for use in the County of Ventura to define
and determine housing eligibility by income level:
p3j { tdeF/� �j 3 �EIF _:I
.1
I& E €a=mmo- 1 {iG P i -EFb, uiM^
Fail
Ede
_
Jnual�EEk3,Fi
Aal f
nuatE4
} knnalrcorrieE;,
�
� { K ��
�nCioni
t
}}
CQ }} #
i
r
.,
a7i� Tl
1 Person
26,150
38,100
52,300
62,760
2 Person
29,900
43,500
59,800
71,760
3 Person
33,600
48,950
67,200
80,640
4 Person
37,350,}
54,400 T
74,700
89,640
5 Person
40,350
58,750
80,700
96,840
6 Person
43,350
63,100
86,700
104,040
7 Person
46,300
67,450
92,600
111,120
8 Person
49,300
71,800
98,600
118,320
Figures are per the Department of Housing and Community Development (California), Division of
Housing Policy Development, January, 2002
RF.PI,ACFMGN'r HOUSING PLAN PAgD ?J"eoaa
The Agency is obligated to replace units and/or bedrooms as discussed in Section I11. - Units To Be
Replaced, above. It is the intent of the Agency to ensure the development of all of the replacement
housing units necessary to fulfill its obligation.
Table 3a is provided for information only, and reflects the current inventory of affordable units
within the City. Table 3b reflects the number of affordable dwelling units and bedrooms that have
been constructed recently and those which are projected to be provided within the next 4 years. Table
4 compares the available bedrooms in affordable units that have been or are anticipated to be created
in future housing projects (see Table 3b) versus bedrooms that will be destroyed as the High Street
Project is implemented.
REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN PAGE 8
*Planned projects with an anticipated completion date within four years
•• Insufficient information available - not included in totals
+ Estimated room distribution
All listed units are or will be covered by regulatory agreement or other recorded covenants
except Villa Campesina.
REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN PAGE 9
Total Remaining ' , ' 142 504 °' ' 19 6 (,5
Bedrooms Created �<
The Agency shall satisfy its replacement housing obligation by using twenty -four (24) of the
very -low income bedrooms, twelve (12) of the low- income bedrooms and ten (10) of the
moderate - income bedrooms that have been created, and/or are anticipated to be created in
future affordable housing projects. All of the bedrooms that are to be replaced may be located
within a fewer number of dwelling units as long as the total number of bedrooms created equal
or exceeds the number of bedrooms destroyed or removed and are in the same or a lower
income category (very low, low and moderate) as the persons displaced from those destroyed
or removed units. The Agency has not incurred any replacement housing obligations prior to
this project.
Based on the above analysis and the Agency's anticipated future affordable housing program,
the Agency will have created a sufficient number of dwelling units to satisfy the replacement
housing obligation for the Project.
REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN PAGE 10
��,� . ,
� its it tt
VI. FINANCING THE REPLACEMENT_H�I:T t: "ft�"
The Redevelopment Plan that was created for the High Street Redevelopment Project Area
authorizes the Agency to finance its activities with assistance from or through a variety of
funding sources, including the County of Ventura, State of California, United States
Government, property tax increment funds, interest income, Agency bonds, or other available
sources.
In the acquisition, construction and /or rehabilitation of the affordable housing units identified
in the preceding section, the Agency may utilize a variety of funding sources to finance these
activities. Sources that may be utilized include: State and /or Federal grants and loans,
including, but not limited to; HOME grants; various mortgage subsidy or guarantee
programs, including Section 202 and programs offered by the California Housing Financing
Agency (Ca1HFA); tax increment funds; below market rate financing through the sale of tax
exempt mortgage revenue bonds (individually or pooled); redevelopment twenty percent set -
aside funds; and developer funds.
Specific funding for future replacement housing units may be through the use of any
combination of the above described methods and sources.
It is hereby found and determined that the replacement housing to be developed and
constructed under this replacement housing plan does not require approval of the voters of the
City of Moorpark pursuant to Article XXXIV of the California Constitution in that the
replacement housing units meet one or more of the exemption criteria.
With respect to the replacement housing units, Article XXXIV also provides for the Agency
to conduct activities which may provide developers assistance in financing, acquisition of land,
leasing of existing dwelling units, monitoring construction of rehabilitation by imposition of
mandated or authorized conditions, and /or other assistance consistent with the Article.
REmACEMEM, HOUSING PLAN PAGE 1 1
The Agency shall complete the construction of replacement housing units necessary to fulfill
the affordable dwelling units discussed in this Plan. All units created as replacement housing
units shall be completed within four (4) years from the date of destruction and shall remain
income restricted for a period as required by law.
In summary, a total of Forty -six (46) bedrooms in thirty -two (32) dwelling units will be
removed as a result of the construction of the Project, causing certain replacement housing
obligations. Based on the dwelling units /bedrooms proposed to be destroyed for the Project,
the Agency shall provide for the replacement housing obligations in the following manner:
Utilizing twenty -four (24) of the very -low income bedrooms, twelve (12) of the
low - income bedrooms, and ten (10) of the moderate - income bedrooms that have
been created, and /or are anticipated to be created in future affordable housing
projects.
The result of the above actions will meet the replacement housing obligations as a result of
proposed projects as mandated under California Redevelopment Law and the Housing and
Community Development Act. The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency recognizes its legal and
community responsibilities in this matter and will make a sincere, good -faith effort to
accomplish these goals. The Agency retains its option to use other approaches and strategies
not discussed herein to fulfill its replacement housing obligations in a timely manner.
RLPI,ACRMEN'r HOUSING PLAN PAGE, 12
() 0G0 "AL a
MOORPARK REDEVELOMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
To: Honorable Agency Board of Directors
From: Nancy Burns, Senior Management Analyst
Date: January 6, 2003 (MRA Board Mtg. January 15, 2003)
Subject: CONSIDER RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE REPLACEMENT
HOUSING PLAN for the HIGH STREET PROJECT
BACKGROUND
The acquisition of the Moorpark Mobilehome Park, anticipated
acquisition of two dwelling units that adjoin the Park, and
plans for two properties already owned by the Redevelopment
Agency will result in the relocation of 32 households. The 2
properties owned by the Redevelopment Agency include 661
Moorpark Avenue and 213 East Los Angeles Avenue. An action that
results in the removal of dwelling units from the low and
moderate income housing market requires that the Agency adopt by
resolution a Replacement Housing Plan.
DISCUSSION
The Replacement Housing Plan must identify the impacts of the
removal of housing which served low and moderate income
households. For each dwelling unit, formerly occupied by a low
income household, that is removed from the housing market, a
replacement dwelling unit of at least as many bedrooms must be
rehabilitated, developed or constructed within 4 years. The
replacement units must be provided at affordable housing cost to
persons at the same or lower income level as the persons
displaced.
The Replacement Housing Plan must provide specific information
about the dwelling units that will address any shortfall created
in the housing market for low and moderate income households.
This includes location, means of financing, number of bedrooms,
and timetable for the creation or rehabilitation of the
0001019
Honorable Agency Board
Date 01/08/03
Page 2
replacement units. The Agency must find that the replacement
housing does not require voter approval, per Article 34 of the
California Constitution, or that voter approval has been
obtained.
Article 34 requires referendum authority before undertaking a
"low rent housing project ". This has come to mean rental
projects in which 50% or more of the rental units are restricted
for low income households. None of the developments identified
in the Replacement Housing Plan which provide dwelling units
that are part of Moorpark's inventory of affordable housing are
subject to Article 34.
As indicated in the Replacement Housing Plan, the Agency's
replacement housing obligation is satisfied with the combined
units produced in existing residential projects and residential
developments with anticipated completion dates within 4 years.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 2003 -
Exhibits: Resolution No. 2003 -
Replacement Housing Plan for the High Street Project
®0Q tAO
CITY OF'VIOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
Redevelopment Agency .Meeting
of ab1`uoxy -,.,, awJ
ACTION: 3noroop-d yvol } YPCnvnmPA
q1A
AGENDA REPORT
MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TO: The Honorable Chair and Board of Directors
FROM: Hugh R. Riley, Assistant Executive Director
DATE: January 22, 2003, (Agency Meeting of February 5,
2003)
SUBJECT: Approve an Agreement for Consulting Services with
Urban Futures Inc., to Prepare a Mid -term Update of
the Agency's 1999 -2004 Implementation Plan.
DISCUSSION:
California Redevelopment Law (CCRL) Section33490 (c) requires
redevelopment agencies to conduct a "mid- term" public
hearing, and hear testimony from all interested parties for
the purpose of reviewing their redevelopment and
corresponding implementation plans, and evaluating the
progress of ongoing redevelopment projects. The Agency's
current Five -Year Plan for 1999 to 2004 was approved in
January 2000.
Staff has obtained a proposal from Urban Futures, Inc, of
Orange, California to assist the Agency with the preparation
and presentation of the required up -date report. The proposal
calls for a public hearing before the Agency Board on April
16, 2003 and includes a fixed fee of $12,500. Sufficient
funds are available in the Agency's operating budget to
complete this requirement.
RECOMMENDATION:
1) Approve agreement with Urban Futures Inc. and authorize
the Executive Director to sign the agreement and related
documents.
Attachment: Agreement
Q0 () G02 1
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
AND URBAN AND FUTURES, INC., FOR CONSULTING
SERVICES RELATED TO THE MID -TERM UPDATE THE
AGENCY'S 1999 -2004 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.
This Agreement is made and entered into in the City of
Moorpark on this day of February, 2003, by and between the
Moorpark Redevelopment Agency ( "AGENCY "), a public body,
corporate and politic, and Urban Futures, Inc., a California
corporation providing consulting services (CONSULTANT).
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, AGENCY has determined that it requires professional
consulting services related to the preparation of a Mid -term
Update to the AGENCY'S 1999 -2004 Implementation Plan; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is experienced in providing such
services and has the proper experience, knowledge and skills to
carry out the duties involved; and
WHEREAS, AGENCY wishes to retain CONSULTANT for the
performance of said services;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants,
benefits and promises herein stated, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
I. Scope of Services
AGENCY does hereby retain CONSULTANT in a contractual
capacity to provide consulting services as described in the
CONSULTANT'S Proposal dated January 2003 which is attached to
this agreement as Exhibit "A ", and made a part hereof.
In the event that additional service is required of
CONSULTANT, beyond the Scope of Services for this Agreement,
CONSULTANT may be authorized to undertake and complete such
additional work only if such authorization is provided in
writing, identifying the exact nature of the additional service
or services required and a "not -to- exceed" fee to be paid by
AGENCY for said additional work, or at a negotiated lump sum
amount approved by AGENCY.
Professional Services Agreement between Page 1 of 9
City of Moorpark and Urban Futures, Inc.
0000��
II. Compensation
The compensation to CONSULTANT shall be a fixed professional
services fee of twelve thousand five dollars ($12,500).
Payment to CONSULTANT shall be made by AGENCY within thirty
(30) days of receipt of invoice, if the invoice is not contested
or questioned by AGENCY. If AGENCY identifies a discrepancy
between the invoice amount and the services or products
completed, AGENCY shall within fifteen (15) workdays of receipt
of the invoice specify in writing the discrepancy. CONSULTANT
shall then either 1) provide support materials to satisfy
AGENCY's stated concern, or 2) revise the invoice to reflect an
adjustment to the stated discrepancy. AGENCY shall then pay the
revised or documented invoice within thirty (30) days of such
revision or documentation.
III. Incorporation by Reference
Exhibit "A ", as previously identified and the Attachments
thereto, is hereby incorporated into and made a part of this
Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of
the Scope of Services found in Exhibit "A" and this Agreement,
the language contained in this Agreement shall take precedence.
IV. Termination or Suspension
This Agreement may be terminated or suspended with or
without cause by AGENCY at any time with no less than five (5)
working days written notice of such termination or suspension.
CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement only by providing AGENCY
with written notice no less than thirty (30) days in advance of
such termination. In the event of such termination or
suspension, CONSULTANT shall be compensated for such services up
to the date of termination or suspension. Such compensation for
work in progress shall be prorated as to the percentage of
progress completed at the date of termination or suspension.
V. Complete Agreement
This written Agreement, including all writings specifically
incorporated herein by reference, shall constitute the complete
Agreement between the parties hereto. No oral Agreement,
understanding, or representation not reduced to writing and
specifically incorporated herein shall be of any force or effect,
Professional Services Agreement between Page 2 of 9
City of Moorpark and Urban Futures, Inc.
0Q. () 0'031
nor shall any such oral Agreement, understanding, or
representation be binding on the parties hereto. Should
interpretation of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, be
necessary, it is deemed that this Agreement was prepared by the
parties jointly and equally, and shall not be interpreted against
either party on the ground that the party prepared the Agreement
or caused it to be prepared. No waiver of any provision of this
Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute, a waiver of any
other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any such
waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same
provisions. No waiver shall be binding, unless executed in
writing by the party making the waiver.
VI. Assignment /Successors
CONSULTANT shall not assign this Agreement, or any of the
rights, duties or obligations hereunder. It is understood and
acknowledged by the parties that CONSULTANT is uniquely qualified
to perform the services provided for in this Agreement.
VII. Term
The Term of this Agreement shall be for a period beginning
with the date first herein written and continuing through May 30,
2003, unless sooner terminated or extended, as herein provided.
CONSULTANT shall perform the professional services identified in
this Agreement in a timely manner, consistent with sound
professional practices.
VIII. Anti- Discrimination
In the performance of the terms of this Agreement,
CONSULTANT agrees that it will not engage in, nor permit such
subcontractors as it may employ, to engage in discrimination in
employment of persons because of the age, race, color, creed,
sex, sexual orientation, national origin, ancestry, religion,
physical disability, medical disability, medical condition, or
marital status of such persons. Violation of this provision may
result in the imposition of penalties referred to in the Labor
Code of the State of California Section 1735.
IX. Insurance and Indemnification
CONSULTANT shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend AGENCY
and its officers, employees, servants and agents and independent
Professional Services Agreement between Page 3 of 9
City of Moorpark and Urban Futures, Inc.
contractors who serve in the role of Executive Director,
Assistant Executive Director, City Clerk, Director of Community
Development, City Engineer, or City Attorney from any claim,
demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense, for any damage
whatsoever, including but not limited to death or injury to any
person and injury to any property, resulting from, or in any way
connected with the performance of this Agreement by CONSULTANT or
AGENCY, except such damage as is caused by the sole negligence of
AGENCY.
CONSULTANT shall secure from a good and responsible company
or companies doing insurance business in the State of California,
pay for, and maintain in full force and effect for the duration
of this Agreement the policies of insurance required by this
section and shall furnish to the City Clerk of the City
certificates of said insurance on or before the commencement of
the term of this Agreement.
Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in any of said
policies or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the
protection offered by the policies shall:
1. Provide general public liability insurance including
automobile liability and property damage insurance in
an amount not less than one million dollars
($1,000,000) per occurrence and annual aggregate.
2. Name AGENCY and its officers, employees, servants and
agents and independent contractors serving in the role
of Executive Director, Assistant Executive Director,
City Clerk, Director of Community Development, City
Engineer, or City Attorney, as additional insured with
CONSULTANT. Confirmation of this coverage shall be
provided on an Insurance Services Office (ISO) Form CG
20 10 11 85 Endorsement, or other form stipulated in
writing by City Clerk.
3. Bear an endorsement or have attached a rider whereby it
is provided that, in the event of cancellation or
amendment of such policy for any reason whatsoever,
AGENCY shall be notified by mail, postage prepaid, not
less than thirty (30) days before the cancellation or
amendment is effective. CONSULTANT shall give AGENCY
thirty (30) days written notice prior to the expiration
of such policy.
Professional Services Agreement between Page 4 of 9
City of Moorpark and Urban Futures, Inc.
0GC1 (), 026'�
4. Be written on an occurrence basis.
CONSULTANT also shall maintain professional liability
(errors and omissions) coverage in an amount not less than one
million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim.
Consistent with this section, CONSULTANT shall provide
workers' compensation insurance as required by the California
Labor Code. If any class of employees engaged by CONSULTANT in
work under this Agreement is not protected by the workers'
compensation law, CONSULTANT shall provide adequate insurance for
the protection of such employees to the satisfaction of AGENCY.
At such point in time that CONSULTANT obtains and provides
any of the above insurance with coverage limits in excess of the
amounts specified above to another of CONSULTANT'S clients,
CONSULTANT shall immediately provide these same coverage limits
to AGENCY.
AGENCY does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may
have against CONSULTANT by reason of this section, because of the
acceptance by AGENCY, or the deposit with AGENCY, of any
insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this
Agreement. This hold harmless and indemnification provision
shall apply regardless of whether or not said insurance policies
are determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage,
liability, loss, cost or expense described in this section.
R. Notices
Any notice to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be
in writing, and all such notices and any other document to be
delivered shall be delivered by personal service or by deposit in
the United States mail, certified or registered, return receipt
requested, with postage prepaid, and addressed to the party for
whom intended as follows:
To: Executive Director
Moorpark Redevelopment Agency
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, California 93021
Professional Services Agreement between Page 5 of 9
City of Moorpark and Urban Futures, Inc.
To: Marshall Linn, President
Urban Futures, Inc.
3111 North Tustin Avenue, Suite 230
Orange, California 92865 -1753
Either party may, from time to time, by written notice to
the other, designate a different address or contact person, which
shall be substituted for the one above specified. Notices,
payments and other documents shall be deemed delivered upon
receipt by personal service or as of the second (2nd) day after
deposit in the United States mail.
XI. General Conditions
A CONSULTANT agrees not to work for any private firm
located within the AGENCY limits or its Area of Interest, or for
any public agency where its jurisdiction includes all or part of
the AGENCY without the prior written consent of the AGENCY,
during the term of this Agreement. Furthermore, CONSULTANT
agrees to limit its actions related to economic interest and
potential or real conflicts of interest as such as defined by
applicable State law to the same standards and requirements for
designated AGENCY employees.
B. AGENCY shall not be called upon to assume any liability
for the direct payment of any salary, wage or other compensation
to any person employed by CONSULTANT performing services
hereunder for AGENCY.
C. CONSULTANT is, and shall at all times, remain as to
AGENCY a wholly independent contractor. Neither the AGENCY, nor
any of its officers, employees, servants or agents, shall have
control over the conduct of CONSULTANT or of CONSULTANT'S
officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth.
CONSULTANT shall not at any time or in any manner represent that
it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner
employees of AGENCY.
D. At the time of 1) termination of this Agreement or 2)
conclusion of all work, all original reports, documents,
calculations, diskettes, computer files, notes, and other related
materials whether prepared by CONSULTANT or its subcontractors)
or obtained in the course of providing the services to be
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole
Professional Services Agreement between Page 6 of 9
City of Moorpark and Urban Futures, Inc.
property of AGENCY. Any word processing computer files provided
to AGENCY shall use Microsoft Word for Windows software.
E. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed,
construed or represented by AGENCY or CONSULTANT or by any third
person to create the relationship of principal or agent, or of a
partnership, or of a joint venture, or of any other association
of any kind or nature between AGENCY and CONSULTANT.
F. In the event any action, suit or proceeding is brought
for the enforcement of, or the declaration of any right or
obligation pursuant to this Agreement or as a result of any
alleged breach of any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing
party shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses,
including reasonable attorney's fees, from the losing party, and
any judgment or decree rendered in such a proceeding shall
include an award thereof.
G. Cases involving a dispute between AGENCY and CONSULTANT
may be decided by an arbitrator if both sides agree in writing on
the arbitration and on the arbitrator selected, with costs
proportional to the judgment of the arbitrator.
H. This Agreement is made, entered into, and executed in
Ventura County, California, and any action filed in any court or
for arbitration for the interpretation, enforcement or other
action of the terms, conditions or covenants referred to herein
shall be filed in the applicable court in Ventura County,
California.
I. The captions and headings of the various Sections and
Exhibits of this Agreement are for convenience and identification
only and shall not be deemed to limit or define the content of
the respective Sections and Exhibits hereof.
J. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of the
parties concerning the subject matter hereof and all prior
Agreements or understandings, oral or written, is hereby merged
herein. This Agreement shall not be amended in any way except by
a written amendment expressly purported to be such an amendment,
signed and acknowledged by both parties hereto.
K. Should interpretation of this Agreement, or any portion
thereof, be necessary, it is deemed that this Agreement was
prepared by the parties jointly and equally, and shall not be
Professional Services Agreement between
City of Moorpark and Urban Futures, Inc.
Page 7 of 9
`1Q 0 C,
interpreted against either party on the ground that a party
prepared the Agreement or caused it to be prepared.
L. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be
deemed, or shall constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of
the same provision. No waiver shall be binding, unless executed
in writing by the party making the waiver.
M. If any portion of this Agreement is held by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the
remaining provisions will never - the -less continue in full force
without being impaired or invalidated in any way.
N. No officer, employee, director or agent of the AGENCY
shall participate in any decision relating to this Agreement
which affects his personal interest or the interest of any
corporation, partnership, or association in which he is directly
or indirectly interested, or shall any such person have any
interest, direct r indirect, in this Agreement or the provisions
thereof.
XII. Responsible Individual
The individual directly responsible for CONSULTANT's overall
performance of the Agreement provisions herein above set forth
and to serve as principal liaison between AGENCY and CONSULTANT
shall be Marshall Linn, and no other individual may be
substituted.
The AGENCY's contact person in charge of administration of
this Agreement and to serve as principal liaison between
CONSULTANT and AGENCY shall be the Executive Director or his
designee.
Professional Services Agreement between Page S of 9
City of Moorpark and Urban Futures, Inc.
aQ()0�9
XIII. Effective Date
This Agreement shall be effective on February
CITY OF MOORPARK:
Steven Kueny
Executive Director
ATTEST:
CONSULTANT:
2003.
Marshall Linn, President
Urban Futures, Inc.
Deborah Traffenstedt, Agency Secretary
Exhibit " "A ": Proposal for Services
Professional Services Agreement between
City of Moorpark and Urban Futures, Inc.
Page 9 of 9
(11 G1U c�®
Proposal to Update
the
1999 -2004
IMPLEMENTATION Prepared For:
PLAN 11 CITY OF MOORPARK
for the
REDEVELOPMENT
City of Moorpark Redevelopment AGENCY
Agency
JANUARY 2003
EXHIBIT A
Prepared By.
URBAN FUTURES, INC.
3111 N. Tustin Ave.
Suite 230
Orange, CA 92865
() ID 01 0 41,31
PROPOSAL TO UPDATE THE 1999 -2004 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
THE CITY OF MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Urban Futures, Inc. (UFI) will complete the following scope of work to prepare the requested mid-
term update of the 1999 -2004 Implementation Plan (the "Plan Update ") for the City of Moorpark
Redevelopment Project (the "Project" or "Project Area" as appropriated in the text). Completion
of the Plan Update as proposed by UFI will ensure compliance with California Community
Redevelopment Law (CCRL) Section 33490(c), which among other requirements, requires
redevelopment agencies to conduct a "mid- term" public hearing, and hear testimony from all
interested parties for the purpose of reviewing their redevelopment and corresponding
implementation plans, and evaluating the progress of ongoing redevelopment project(s). The
scope of work presented below, assumes that City of Moorpark Redevelopment Agency (the
"Agency ") staff will provide UFI with the data base information as required by UFI.
WORK SCOPE
UFI will complete the following work tasks:
TASK 1: Work with Agency /City staff to identify all pertinent information and data sources
necessary to complete the scope of work.
TASK 2: Evaluate specific Agency projects or programs (hereinafter referred to as
"activities ") which have been completed, continued, or initiated during the current
five (5) year cycle (1999 -2004) and compare their status with the 1999 -2004
Implementation Plan goals, objectives, and work program. Actual Agency activities
for 1999 -2002 will be identified. Activities to be reviewed will include both general
redevelopment activities and those funded from LMI Fund monies. The ongoing
nexus between Agency activities and blight reduction in the Project Area will be
established.
TASK 3: In conjunction with Task 2, evaluate the Agency's success at achieving its
previously established goals and objectives, and if necessary, make
recommendations as to how the Agency might be more effective in achieving
existing or newly modified goals and objectives.
TASK 4: For general redevelopment fund activities, track actual Agency receipts and
expenditures [1999- 2002]; determine and explain any divergence between actual
and projected receipts and expenditures.
TASK 5: For general redevelopment fund activities, review and modify, as appropriate, 2003-
2004 receipts and expenditures projections.
TASK 6: For LMI Fund activities, track actual Agency receipts and expenditures [1999- 2002];
determine and explain any divergence between actual and projected receipts and
expenditures.
TASK 7: For LMI Fund activities, review and modify, as appropriate, 2003 -2004 receipts and
expenditures projections.
Z:l00Proposals\Mooroark _Mid- TermUpdate.0l .wpd 1 des :1!22/02
TASK 8: Track and record on UFI developed schedules Agency inclusionary and
replacement housing compliance. This task will require that Agency Staff provide
an inventory of all housing unit development completed within and outside the
Project Area by the Agency, or by others within the Project Area, since the inception
of the redevelopment plan. Agency staff will also have to provide an inventory of
Agency assisted units and the type and duration of assistance.
TASK 9: Based upon information compiled in Task 8, determine whether the Agency is in a
deficit or surplus unit(s) position in either of the inclusionary or replacement housing
categories, and how either of those positions will affect the Agency during the
current planning cycle.
TASK 10: Determine whether the Agency has an "excess surplus" in its LMI Fund, and how
that position will affect the Agency's long -term overall fiscal position.
TASK 11: In conjunction with Tasks 8, 9, and 10, evaluate the Agency's position with respect
to housing affordability covenants (pursuant to both CCRL Sections 33334.3 and
33413), and whether or not the Agency has adequate covenants. If the Agency has
or is projected to have an inclusionary or replacement housing deficit, identify the
number and type of housing units needed to erase the deficit within the current
planning cycle and over the next five- and ten- year planning cycles.
TASK 12:
TASK 13:
TASK 14:
TASK 15:
TASK 16:
TASK 17:
EXPERIENCE
Determine how future housing development and proposed land use changes, if any,
will affect the Agency's future inclusionary and replacement housing obligations.
Prepare Draft Plan for staff review and comment.
Prepare adoption notices.'
Prepare adopting resolution and staff report.
Prepare Final Plan for Agency's consideration and adoption.
Prepare for and attend required public hearing.'
Included in Attachment B to this proposal is a list of UFI's Corporate References, our Statement
of Qualifications and Current Professional Services Fee Schedule. We urge the Agency to call any
or all of the contacts listed to confirm the redevelopment services we have provided, as well as the
timely and professional manner in which such services were performed.
' Adoption of an implementation plan mid -term update shall follow a noticed public hearing, which notice must be
posted in a minimum of four (4) locations in the project area. These postings must be for a minimum of three (3)
weeks ending at least ten (10) days prior to the Agency's hearing. Also, the notice for the hearing needs to be
published once a week for three (3) weeks in a newspaper of general circulation. The initial notice must be published
no fewer than thirty -one (31) days prior to the hearing.
2 Community meetings can be added to the scope of work on a time and materials basis, if desired.
Z: \OOProposals\Moorpark _Mid- TermUpdate.0l .wpd
K
Jjei s�,`,t 7 /22/02
We anticipate writing the mid -term updates for at least 15 different agencies across California.
Included in Attachment A is a list of cities we've written Implementation Plans for in 1999. We are
currently provided mid -term implementation plan update services for Delano, Highland, Lancaster,
Manteca, Santa Paula and Upland.
TIME FRAME
UFI will complete the proposed scope of work in such time that the Agency will be able to conduct
its required public hearing consistent within requirements promulgated under CCRL Section
33490(c), with exception of the time requirements stated therein. The suggested completion
schedule for preparation, staff review, final Midterm Update document and respective public
hearing is attached in Exhibit A.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE FEE
UFI will complete the proposed scope of work for a fixed professional services fee of $12,500. This
fee does not include any out -of- pocket expenses, e.g., printing, electronic data files, travel, etc.,
that may be incurred during execution of the planning process or additional meetings, as requested
by the Agency, which will be billed on an actual time and materials basis. All out -of- pocket
expenses will be invoiced to the City at a cost plus 10 %.
Marshall F. Linn, President
Hugh R. Riley, Assistant City Manager
Z:100Proposals\Moorpark_Mid -Term Update. 0 l .wpd
3
/ G3
Date
Date
jes 11/22102
�& �30C-I L34
ATTACHMENT A
Schedule of Completion
City of Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency Contacts
Name Title Phone E -Mail
Hugh R. Riley Asst. City Manager 805- 529 -6864 x 215 hriley@ci.moorl)ark.ca.us
Deborah Traffenstedt City Clerk 805 -529 -6864 x 213 draffenstedt@ci.moorpark.ca.us
Maureen Benson Deputy City Clerk 805 -529 -6864 x 223 mbenson @ci.moorpark.ca.us
1) Agency Public Hearing
Schedule
April 16, 2003
2) Notice to Newspaper March 10, 2003
(Email to City Clerk at a minimum of 4 days prior to publishing Public Notice in Newspaper)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Public Notice Published in Newspaper March 14, 21, and 28, 2003
(31 days prior to Public Hearing)
Posting March 14- April 4, 2003
(3- consecutive weeks in 4 locations for each Project Area, prior to Public Hearing)
Agenda Deadline April 1, 2003
(Email to Deputy City Clerk Mid Term Update and Staff Report)
Initial Draft Review
Revised Draft Review
(By staff)
Final Document
March 11, 2003
March 18, 2003
March 25, 2003
ATTACHMENT B
Urban Futures, Inc.
Qualifications, Resumes, References
Professional Services
Fee Schedule
Z: tOOProposalslMoorpark_M id- TermUpdate.0l .wpd
}esl t 1zuoz
000-6. -'31'd
URBAN .4 .
QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Formed in 1972, Urban Futures, Inc. (UFI) offers public and private sector clients a wide range of
specialized planning, redevelopment, implementation and public financing services. UFI staff is
comprised of highly skilled professionals able to handle assignments ranging from site - specific
developer negotiations to community wide development strategies, redevelopment plans, entitle-
ment processing, financial advisement, affordable housing programs, economic development
implementation strategies.
Redevelopment Plan Adoption, Amendment and Merger Services
UFI has provided redevelopment plan adoption, amendment and merger services to well over 125
agencies. Key to those services are the following fundamental skills and qualifications:
Knowledge of Redevelopment Law and California Environmental Quay Act (CEQA)
UFI has the necessary expertise to prepare a legally defensible Plan in the post -AB 1290 era,
including all related components required by the CCRL such as CEQA compliance, which
evaluates related environmental impacts; the Preliminary Report, which documents the
relevant economic, social and physical data existing in the proposed project area and
substantiates blighted conditions. UFI works closely with Agency staff and Agency counsel
to provide the best documentation that a shared effort can achieve.
Citizen Participation
UFI has prepared redevelopment plans/amendments involving as few as seven to more than
23,000 privately -owned parcels. We believe a well - planned, public participation program,
which includes public information brochures, audio visual and Internet presentations, can
effectively educate the community to the advantages of locally- controlled community
redevelopment. UFI has developed a comprehensive citizen information program which
contains audio - visual and handbook components, The firm has bilingual (English/Spanish)
citizen participation program capabilities. We make a major effort to provide information to
all segments of the local area regarding the redevelopment process and its benefits.
Technical Ability
The UFI staff has extensive background in analyzing complex land use planning and
environmental and economic issues applicable to the redevelopment process. Our
experience in blight and mitigation issues, as they relate to both large and small
redevelopment project areas, will be most valuable during the preparation of specific public
improvements and economic development projects.
Urban Futures is very experienced in the preparation of environmental documents and
procedures necessary for successful CEQA compliance. In almost all cases where we have
Z:\000FI Forms \S0Q- ufi\2o02S0Q.v14.wpd jW0002
r r - URBAN R
provided plan adoption services, we have provided the Program EIR as an integral portion
of the entire program. This allows for optimum use of analytical information and economic
resources during the Plan adoption process.
To facilitate Plan adoption, CEQA compliance and other planning tasks, UFI has developed
comprehensive, computer- aided, geo -data base collection and analysis capabilities that
include geographic information (GIS) and MetroScan systems. These systems allow UFI
staff to collect and evaluate pertinent statistical and geographic data at various levels of
detail, ranging from citywide to a parcel -by- parcel basis.
Fiscal Representation
While fiscal matters have been significantly altered by AB 1290, the scope of any assignment
will still require fiscal consultations with affected taxing entities regarding the potential
modification of existing and development of new pass- through agreements. UFI has
successfully negotiated with many taxing agencies for various client redevelopment agencies
located throughout the State of California.
UFI staff can effectively navigate City and Agency staff through plan adoption/amendment hurdles,
including legislative amendments which mandate preparation of implementation plans and
reformed affordable housing compliance programs and long -term redevelopment plan
implementation restrictions. In the post AB -1290 era, it is imperative that the Agency give each of
these issues careful analysis, making allowances for implementation processes and procedures
in order to successfully avoid both short- and long -term pitfalls while maximizing redevelopment
potential.
Development, Redevelopment, Economic Development Advisory Services
The UFI team prides itself in bringing to each client a unique "turnkey" capability; our firm provides
all financial, planning, development processing and redevelopment advisory services necessary
to ensure that each project or program is successfully implemented in a timely fashion, including:
• Defining client priorities
• Grant preparation
• Conducting organizational and community facilitation
services
• Annexation analysis and processing services
• Marketing site specific real estate projects to the
development community
• Entitlement processing
ZA000FI Fomm\SOQ- uf12002SOQ.v14.wpd 2
• Preparing organizational, community, economic
development, affordable housing, or site specific
strategic and implementation plans
• Development feasibility, pre - development and due
diligence services
• Providing developer selection services
• Analyzing complex development pro formas and
cash flows
• Preparing cost/benefit analysis
jim10/2/02
00100 ?43*9
• Review of complex, attorney - drafted Disposition and
Development Agreements (DDA's), Owner Participation
Agreements (OPA's), Development Agreements, and
drafting of less complex real estate documents such as
loan agreements, easement agreements and leases
Financial Advisory Services
URBAN AN F TURES,, INC.
• Developer, property owner and Public Agency
negotiations
• Presentations before planning commissions, city
councils, redevelopment agencies and other
public forums
UFI has provided financial advisory and fiscal consultation services on hundreds of bond financings
for public agencies throughout the State of California. Our firm does not underwrite municipal
securities, nor do we have any ownership relations with firms that do so. Our firm functions only
as an independent financial advisor to local government. UFI, during the past two decades, has
provided professional services to over 150 governmental jurisdictions and more than 75
redevelopment agencies. The cumulative value of issues for which we have served as financial
advisor now exceeds three billion dollars.
ZA000FI ForrnAS0Q- uV\2002S0Q.v14.wpd 3 jW012J02
� '`10
URBAN FUTURES,INC..
PROFESSIONAL STAFF RESUMES
MARSHALL F. LINN, President
Marshall Linn has more than 38 years of municipal and private consulting experience combined
with professorships at both the University of California, Irvine Campus and California State
Polytechnic University, Pomona. Over the last 28 years Mr. Linn has specialized in the preparation
and implementation of more than 150 redevelopment plans. As a financial advisor, Mr. Linn has
participated in more than 275 bond issues, including 50 single - family and multi - family mortgage
revenue bond issues, totaling over three billion dollars in tax exempt securities. He has also served
as financial advisor for over 160 tax allocation notes, bonds and Certificates of Participation, lease
revenue bonds, sewer and water revenue bonds and other miscellaneous type of transactions.
Education: Bachelor of Science Degree, Economics; Master's Degree, Urban Planning, University
of Southern California.
JON D. HUFFMAN, Executive Vice President
Jon Huffman has more than 20 years of experience in redevelopment, planning and related
professions. Mr. Huffman has expertise in the areas of redevelopment, land use, policy and
environmental planning and design, and has an extensive working knowledge of the California
Community Redevelopment Law, the California Environmental Quality Act, and California Planning
and Zoning Laws. In addition to extensive redevelopment experience Mr. Huffman has directed
numerous planning and special studies projects, including Specific Development Plans, General
Plan Amendments, CEQA Compliance, housing and Urban Corridor Studies. Mr. Huffman has
been with Urban Futures, Inc. since 1987.
Education: Bachelor of Architecture Degree, University of Oregon, Eugene; Master of Landscape
Architecture Degree, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, and Certificates in Real
Estate Appraisal, California State University, Fullerton.
ZA000FI Foms\S0Q- ufi12002S00.v14.wpd 4 jIm1012102
0 GelC, �
URBAN
RICHARD H. TILLBERG, AICP, Vice President
Richard Tillberg has over 20 years of experience in redevelopment and real estate development.
He has been Executive Director of the Cudahy Redevelopment Agency as well as that City's
Community Development and Planning Director. Mr. Tillberg has also been chief executive officer
of a non - profit, affordable housing development company with a portfolio in excess of 800 senior
apartment units valued at $57 million. Additionally, he has been a private developer, developing
retail centers throughout Southern California. As both a private developer and a public sector
redevelopment practitioner, Mr. Tillberg has led negotiating teams resulting in more than 25 owner -
participation or disposition and development agreements valued in excess of $100 million.
Education: Bachelor of Arts Degree, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA; Master of
Arts,. Urban Planning, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD.
DOUGLAS P. ANDERSON, Vice President
Douglas Anderson is expert in the areas of tax revenue analysis and bond administration. He is
responsible for the administration of single - family and multi - family mortgage revenue bonds, as well
as the analysis and development of many types of municipal financing. The single - family mortgage
revenue bond portfolio, for which Mr. Anderson is responsible, consists of more than 45 issues,
representing over two billion dollars of tax- exempt financing. Mr. Anderson is responsible for the
research and analysis necessary to structure tax allocation bond issues, including tax increment
revenue projections and analysis of the revenue created by new development. Prior to his work
with Urban Futures, Mr. Anderson completed a commercial officer training program with First
Interstate Bank of California that included comprehensive training in commercial finance, housing
and credit analysis. Mr. Anderson has been with Urban Futures since 1985.
Education: Mr. Anderson earned a Bachelor of Science Degree from San Diego State University
in Business Administration, with a Finance emphasis.
ZADOUR FOrms1S0Q•ufA2002S00.v14.wpd 5 jW0002
C11 Cr 0 0; 12
URBAN FUTURES., INC.
GEORGE E. HANSEN, Principal Planner
George Hansen has a very diverse career in the private, non - profit, and public business sectors.
He has over 15 years of experience in the public sector involving Planning and Community
Development, Economic. Development, Redevelopment, Housing Administration and CEQA
compliance. Mr. Hansen served as Community and Economic Development Director for the City's
of Ridgecrest and Solvang, and City Planner for the City of Brea. He has additionally served as the
City of Ridgecrest's Deputy Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency, where he was
successful in obtaining over 8 million dollars in grants for the City of Ridgecrest in a 3.5 year period,
and relocating a number of small business to the community and formulation of a number of
successful economic partnerships, one with the China Lake Naval Weapons Center. Mr. Hansen's
private sector career involves both affordable housing real estate development, with a portfolio in
excess of 1,300 senior and congregate apartment units valued at 216 million, and a successful 8
year career in Landscape Architecture, culminating with an award winning project for the 1984
Olympics.
Education
Bachelor of Science Degree, Urban and Regional Planning, California State Polytechnic University,
Pomona; and a Master of Landscape Architecture, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona.
BENJAMIN J. PONGETTI, GIS Analyst
Mr. Pongetti specializes in the acquisition and development of spatial data for analysis in
geographic information systems (GIS). His experience includes detailed research and analysis of
county property records utilizing GIS, database, spreadsheet, and custom real estate programs.
He is responsible for the creation of all cartographic products prepared by UFI. He is also
responsible for coordination of mailing and transmittals as required by the California Community
Redevelopment Law, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and other California Laws as
part of redevelopment, CEQA compliance and special projects. He has contributed to the
preparation of over 15 redevelopment plans and/or amendments including those for the cities of
Blythe, Fillmore, Morgan Hill, Hesperia, South El Monte, and West Covina.
Education
Mr. Pongetti earned a Bachelor of Arts Degree from California State University, Fullerton in
Geography, with emphasis in Environmental Analysis. Additionally, he has taken course work in
database and spreadsheet computer applications, and holds Certificates from California State
University, Fullerton; the first in Real Estate Appraisal, the second in Microsoft Access.
Z:\000FI Fomrs1,S00- ufi12002S00.v14.wpd 6 jlm1012102
() 0.()0 3
URBAN FUTURES, INC.
CYNTHIA NORTON, Planner
Cynthia Norton served as the Housing Planner for the Teton County Housing Authority in Jackson,
Wyoming. This position gave her a broad experience in the field of constructing affordable housing.
Her experience included amending county regulations to facilitate and encourage affordable
housing production, grant writing, and project development. Ms. Norton has also worked for the
Teton County Planning Department where she created and distributed an employee housing needs
survey, monitored open space easements, and conducted fiscal trend analyses between the Town
of Jackson and Teton County. Ms. Norton is proficient in analysis of survey data with SPSS
statistical software.
Education:
Ms. Norton earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in English Literature from Lake Forest College,
Illinois. She also has completed all course work for a Master's in Planning from the University of
Wyoming.
FARA L. O'NEAL, Assistant Planner
Fara O'Neal served as a Regional Enforcement Coordinator for the Texas Natural Resource
Conservation Commission, which gave her broad experience in the regulation of air, water and
waste. She has worked with the City of Bend, Oregon, Bend -La Pine School District, City of Waco,
Texas, Heart of Texas Council of Governments, and Brazos River Authority. She has participated
on citizen advisory committees specializing in general plans, educational reform and educational
facility planning. She has also studied the economic impact of parks and recreation facilities. She
prepares California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Environmental Impact Reports (EIR) and
monitors compliance with OPA/DDA projects.
Education
Ms. O'Neal earned a Bachelor of the Arts Degree from Baylor University, Texas specializing in
Environmental Studies and Political Science. She also holds an Associate's Degree from Central
Oregon Community College, concentrating in Business Administration.
ZAD0UFI Foms \S00- ufi12002S00.v14.wpd 7 jIm1012/02
.r C 4.4
URBAN FUTURES,
�.� �.. .., r S x4.:.411'. .ae.. ;' �� .��•�. -.' a.S .AT GG-A: Y.
CORPORATE REFERENCES
Vickie Burt, Economic Development/
Redevelopment Director
CITY OF BANNING
99 E. Ramsey Street
Banning, CA 92220 -0998
(909) 922 -3171
R. Michael Robinson, AICP
Planning & Development Manager
CITY OF COSTA MESA
77 Fair Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92628 -1200
(714) 754 -5610
J. Edward Todd, City Manager
CITY OF DINUBA
405 E. El Monte Street
Dinuba, CA 93618
(559) 591 -5904
John W. Slota, City Administrator
CITY OF GRIDLEY
685 Kentucky Street
Gridley, CA 95948
(530)846 -5695
Z:MUFI Foms\,S0Q- uli12o02S00.v14.wpd
C3
Robert E. Wilburn, City Manager
CITY OF HUGHSON
7018 Pine Street, P. O. Box 6
Hughson, CA 95326
(209) 883 -4055
James C. Gilley, Executive Director
LANCASTER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
44933 N. Fern Avenue
Lancaster, CA 93534
(805) 723 -6006
Richard Dahlgren, Redevelopment Director
CITY OF LOS BANOS
520 °J" Street, P. O. Box 31
Los Banos, CA 93635
(209) 827 -7000
Robb R. Steel, Redevelopment/
Economic Development Director
CITY OF RIALTO
131 S. Riverside Avenue
Rialto, CA 92376
(909) 879 -1149
rTl w
00010
URBAN
-.y.; .e A:r;: x .!;'.. _ r H :r >: .w ;v:.wy .z _ :a.•,•s
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES/CITIES AND INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS
THAT URBAN FUTURES, INC. HAS SERVED
Adalanto
Fresno County
Ontario Local
Alameda County
Garden Grove
Redevelopment Authority
Anderson
Glendora
(Military Base Reuse)
Apple Valley
Gonzales
Orange
Arroyo Grande
Grand Terrace
Orange County
Azusa
Greenfield
Oxnard
Bakersfield
Gridley
Parlier
Baldwin Park
Grover Beach
Pasadena
Banning
Hanford
Pico Rivera
Barstow
Hawaiian Gardens
Pismo Beach
Bell Gardens
Hesperia
Pomona
Belmont
Highland
Rancho Cucamonga
Big Bear Lake
Holtville
Rancho Palos Verdes
Blythe
Hughson
Redondo Beach
Brawley
Huntington Beach
Reedley
Brisbane
Huntington Park
Rialto
Buena Park
Imperial, City of
Ripon
Calipatria
Indio
Rocklin
Calexico
Industry
San Bernardino
Carson
Lafayette
San Diego, City
Cathedral City
Lancaster
San Diego, County
Ceres
La Verne
San Dimas
Coalinga
Lawndale
San Francisco
Colton
Lemoore
San Juan Capistrano
Commerce
Lindsay
San Luis Obispo, City
Corona
Livingston
San Luis Obispo, County
Costa Mesa
Loma Linda
San Leandro
Covina
Los Angeles, City
Santa Ana
Crescent City
Los Angeles, County
San Buenaventura
Cudahy
Los Banos
Santa Paula
Delano
Manhattan Beach
San Fernando
Desert Hot Springs
Manteca
San Jacinto
Dinuba
March Joint Powers
Shasta Utility District
Downey
Authority
South El Monte
Duarte
(Military Base Reuse)
Stanislaus County
Economic Development
Maywood
Stanton
Corporation- Southwest
Mendota
Susanville
Riverside County
Merced
University of La Verne
El Centro
Montebello
Upland
Exeter
Monterey Park
Ventura
Fillmore
Moorpark
Victor Valley Economic
Firebaugh
Morgan Hill
Development Authority
Folsom
Murrieta
(Military Base Reuse)
Fort Bragg
Needles
Walnut
Fountain Valley
Norco
West Covina
Fowler
Oceanside
Westminster
Fresno
Ontario
Winton
Yorba Linda
Z:100UFI Foms4S0Q- ufi\2002S0Q.v14.Md 9 OMIO /02
.0 p ^ 1d
E� ` "L
3 G
URBAN FUTURES, INC.
REPRESENTATIVE BOND ISSUERS AND /OR ADMINISTRATION CLIENTS
Azusa
Big Bear Redevelopment Agency
Barstow
Blythe
Blythe Redevelopment Agency
Brawley
Brawiey Redevelopment Agency
Calexico
Calexico Community Redevelopment
Agency
California Statewide Community Development
Authority (CSCDA)
Camarillo
Cathedral City
Cathedral City Redevelopment Agency
Clovis
Colton Redevelopment Agency
Concord
Covina
Covina Redevelopment Agency
Covina - Rancho Cucamonga-Calexico-
Downey Housing Finance Agency
Delano Redevelopment Agency
Dinuba
Dinuba Redevelopment Agency
Duarte Redevelopment Agency
El Monte - Downey -San Jacinto
Housing Finance Agency
Encinitas
Escondido -Chula Vista Housing
Finance Agency
Firebaugh Redevelopment Agency
Fresno
Garden Grove
Highland
Highland Redevelopment Agency
Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency
Indio
Lancaster
Lancaster Housing Authority
Lancaster Redevelopment Agency
Lemoore
Lemoore Redevelopment Agency
Lindsay Redevelopment Agency
Livermore
Loma Linda
Los Angeles County
Manteca
Manteca Redevelopment Agency
Montebello Redevelopment Agency
Montebello-Oxnard Housing Finance Agency
Monterey Park
Moorpark
Z\OOUFI ForrnsWQ- ufi\2002S0Q.v14.wpd
Moorpark Redevelopment Agency
Moreno Valley
Murrieta
Murrieta Joint Powers Authority
National City
Norco
Norco Redevelopment Agency
Oceanside
Ontario Redevelopment Agency
Orange County
Orange County Redevelopment Agency
Oxnard
Palmdale
Paramount
Pasadena Community Development
Commission
Phoenix, Arizona
Pittsburg
Pomona
Pomona Redevelopment Agency
Port Hueneme - Covina Housing Finance
Agency
Rancho Cucamonga
Redlands
Rialto
Riverside County
Sacramento County
San Bernardino County
San Buenaventura - Covina Housing Finance
Agency
San Diego County
San Diego County Housing Authority
San Jacinto
San Juan Capistrano Redevelopment
Agency
San Leandro
San Marcos
Simi Valley
Southern California Home Financing
Authority (SCHAFA)
Stanton
Stanton Redevelopment Agency
Thousand Oaks
Union City
Upland
Vallejo
Victorville
Vista
Walnut Improvement Agency
Westminster
Westminster Redevelopment Agency
Winton
Yucaipa
10
;Im10002
ti kJ 'Gr' 2-,
URBAN FUTURES, INC.
im
CURRENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE
Principal ........................... $ 185.00 per hour
Principal Planner .................... 120.00 per hour
Senior Planner ...................... 95.00 per hour
Staff Planner /GIS .................... 85.00 per hour
Assistant Planner .................... 65.00 per hour
Clerical ............................ 45.00 per hour
Telephone, printing, duplication, reproduction, postage, legal description, state filing fees and other
out -of- pocket expenses are billed at cost plus 10% to cover administrative costs.
Z\OOUFI For s\.SOQ- uti\2002SOQ.v14.wpd
11
jlmt O/2102
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
Redevelopment Agency Meeting
MINUTES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY -1 b0- k(-
ACTION. mer
Moorpark, California DPremher 18, 2002
A Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment AgencyRvof the City of
Moorpark was held on December 18, 2002, in the Community Center
of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark,
California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Hunter called the meeting to order at 7:25 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL:
Present: Agency Members Harper, Mikos, Millhouse,
Parvin, and Chair Hunter.
Staff Present: Steven Kueny, Executive Director; Joseph
Montes, General Counsel; Hugh Riley,
Assistant Executive Director; and Deborah
Traffenstedt, Agency Secretary.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT:
None.
4. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
None.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR:
AGENCY MOTION: Agency Member Harper moved and Agency Member
Mikos seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar. The
motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.
A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of
December 4, 2002. Staff Recommendation: Approve
minutes as processed.
B. Consider Quitclaim Deed for Easement on Poindexter
Park for Tract 5161, Cabrillo Economic Development
Corporation. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the
Redevelopment Agency to execute and the City Clerk to
record in the office of the Ventura County Recorder
the Easement Quitclaim Deed and the attachments.
C11 � 9
Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency
Moorpark, California Page 2 December 18, 2002
6. CLOSED SESSION:
None was held.
8. ADJOURNMENT:
AGENCY MOTION: Agency Member Mikos moved and Agency Member
Harper seconded a motion to adjourn. The motion carried by
unanimous voice vote. The time was 7:26 p.m.
Patrick Hunter, Chair
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt
Agency Secretary
t��r 6 -� � O
' G • . �10.�'
MINUTES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Moorpark, California
January 15, 2003
A Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Moorpark was held on January 15, 2003, in the Community Center
of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark,
California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Hunter called the meeting to order at 7:20 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL:
Present: Agency Members Harper, Mikos, Millhouse,
Parvin, and Chair Hunter.
Staff Present: Steven Kueny, Executive Director; Joseph
Montes, General Counsel; Hugh Riley,
Assistant Executive Director; Nancy Burns,
Senior Management Analyst; and Deborah
Traffenstedt, Agency Secretary.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT:
None.
4. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
A. Consider Adoption of A Replacement Housing Plan
Resolution. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No.
2003-
Ms. Burns gave the staff report.
In response to Agency Member Mikos, Ms. Burns stated
that it would not create a problem to delay this item
to the February 5, 2003, meeting in order to clarify
issues in the draft.
In response to Chair Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated
that there were no speakers.
Agency Member Mikos stated that the titles of Table 3
and Table 4, contained on stamped pages 15 and 16 of
the staff report, reference projects with proposed
dwelling units; however, some of the projects that are
0100 Col"
Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency
Moorpark, California Page 2 January 15, 2003
listed have existed for a long time; and they are
mixed in with the proposed projects coming on line.
She stated that in looking into this, she found that
there are vagaries in the Redevelopment Law that allow
you to count the projects you have completed in the
past, as well as the projects you propose to do in the
future, so it is not entirely inaccurate; however, in
terms of a practical, understandable document, the
titles should at least be changed, for instance Table
3. should say "Affordable Housing Project Dwelling
Units (Bedrooms) Created and Proposed to Be Created
with Participation by the Moorpark Redevelopment
Agency (from whatever the beginning year was to
2003) ". She explained that this is a baseline chart,
which is explaining all the affordable housing units
that have ever been created with the help of the
Agency. Agency Member Mikos went on to state that
this is a good thing to have, but it should not make
it seem like we are trying to count projects we have
done in the past to pay for what we are doing in the
future, to destroy something else.
Agency Member Mikos stated that even without counting
Archstone, LeClub, and Villa Campesina, the
requirement for the replacement will be met; maybe
Tafoya Terrace should be included and it is not; she
is not sure Villa Campesina has deed restrictions; and
there are other areas of confusion, which need to be
clarified.
Agency Member Mikos also stated that the city has been
very pro- active about getting affordable units on the
ground, unlike some other cities in California, but
even though that has been done, maybe we should set a
higher standard in terms of how we do things and not
count past projects for replacing things we are
destroying now; maybe set a certain time limit for
including projects from the past to only three or four
years back, plus the projects in the future up to four
years. She recommended sending this subject to the
Affordable Housing Committee for discussion and a
recommendation to the Council, while she works with
staff on editorial changes to make this a better
document.
0052
Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency
Moorpark, California Pacae 3 January 15, 2003
Mr. Kueny concurred with Agency Member Mikos'
comments, in regard to Tables 3 and 4 and stated that
staff would work with her to incorporate her comments.
He requested a two -week continuance.
CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Agency to
continue this item to February 5, 2003, to allow staff to
revise Table 3 and Table 4.
B. Consider Adoption of Relocation Plan for the 213 East
Los Angeles Avenue Project. Staff Recommendation:
Adopt the Relocation Plan for the 213 East Los Angeles
Avenue Project.
Ms. Burns gave the staff report.
There were no questions from the Agency.
In response to Chair Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated
that there were no speakers.
MOTION: Agency Member Parvin moved and Agency Member
Harper seconded a motion to adopt the Relocation Plan for
the 213 East Los Angeles Avenue Project. The motion
carried by unanimous voice vote.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR:
A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of
December 18, 2002. Staff Recommendation: Approve
minutes.
No action was taken.
6. CLOSED SESSION:
None was held.
Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency
Moorpark, California Page 4 January 15, 2003
8. ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION: Agency Member Harper moved and Agency Member Mikos
seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting of the Moorpark
Redevelopment Agency. The motion carried by unanimous voice
vote. The time was 7:28 p.m.
Patrick Hunter, Chair
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt
Agency Secretary
je-
nb >'
C? .
�;�� i'y