Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2004 0421 RDA REGJESTABLISHED UAM Is. Igor 'QF 1 ' 4Q�S Resolution No. 2004 -138 MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, APRIL 21, 2004 7:00 P.M. Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PUBLIC COMMENT: PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Sale or Lease of Approximately .5 Acre Remnant Parcel Adjacent to New Public Works /Parks Department Corporation Yard. (continued from April 7, 2004) Staff Recommendation: Obtain proposals from interested parties in conformance with the provisions of Section 421 of the Redevelopment Plan and Health and Safety Code Sections 33430 - 33449 for the disposition of the approximate .5 acre parcel. (Staff: Hugh Riley) CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of April 7, 2004. Staff Recommendation: 6. CLOSED SESSION: A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL Significant exposure t (b) of Section 54956.9 cases to be discussed Approve minutes. COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION o litigation pursuant to Subdivision of the Government Code: (Number of - 4) Redevelopment Agency Agenda April 21, 2004 Page 2 6. CLOSED SESSION: (continued) B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Pursuant to Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code) Mission Bell Plaza Phase II, LLC, a California limited partnership vs. Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO28906) D. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: (APN 512 -0- 090 -105) Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager /Executive Director Negotiating Parties: The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency and Atreko, Inc. Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment E. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: A portion of APN 512 -0- 150 -765 Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager /Executive Director Negotiating Parties: The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency and a party to be identified Under Negotiation: Price and terms of sale F. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: (APN 512 -0- 081 -110) Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager /Executive Director Negotiating Parties: Daly -Owens Group Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment 7. ADJOURNMENT: Redevelopment Agency Agenda April 21, 2004 Page 3 Any member of e public may address the -Agency during the Public Comments portion o t e Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or a Presentation /Action /Discussion item. Speakers who wish to address the Agency concerning a Public Hearing or Presentations /Action/ Discussion item must do so during the Public Hearing or Presentations /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker cards must be received by the City Clerk for Public Comments prior to the beginning of the Public Comments portion of the meeting and for Presentation /Action /Discussion items prior to the beginning of the first item of the Presentation /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda. Speaker Cards for a Public Hearing must be received prior to the beginning of the Public Hearing. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Comment and Presentation /Action /Discussion item speaker. A limitation of three to five minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Hearing item speaker. Written Statement Cards ma be submitted in lieu of speaking orally for open Public Hearings and Presentation /Action�Discussion items. Copies of each item of business on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public review. Any questions concerning any agenda item may be directed to the City Clerk at (805) 517 -6223. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to review an agenda or participate in this meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (805) 517 -6223. Upon request, the agenda can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Any request for disability- related modification or accommodation should be made at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled meeting to assist the City staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting (28 CFR 35.102 - 35.104; ADA Title II). EM !_ A - CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA Redevelopment Agency Meeting of ACTION: MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable Chair and Board of Directors FROM: Hugh R. Riley, Assistant Executive Director" DATE: April 9, 2004 (Agency Meeting of April 21, 2004) SUBJECT: Sale or Lease of Approximately .5 Acre Remnant Parcel Adjacent to New Public Works /Parks Department Corporation Yard BACKGROUND: At the Agency's April 7, 2004, regular meeting, the Board considered options for the sale or lease of an approximate .5 acre parcel located at the terminus of Fitch Avenue in the Flinn Road Business Center acquired by the Agency as part of a larger parcel intended for the development of a new Public Works /Parks Department Corporation Yard. During the March 17 meeting, a private party expressed interest in acquiring the property. The Board approved two of three staff recommendations and: 1) Declared the approximate .5 acre parcel as surplus property; 2) Directed staff to establish a fair market value for the property and prepare a legal description and take other actions necessary to create a separate parcel The Board continued the item to its meeting of April 21, 2004 in order to consider whether to solicit competitive development proposals from interested parties or to negotiate a sale of the parcel. An appraisal update has been requested and will be available by April 26, 2004. 00000-1 Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Agenda Report March 30, 2004 Page 2 STAFF RECODMENDATION: Obtain proposals from interested parties in conformance with the provisions of Section 421 of the Redevelopment Plan and Health and Safety Code Sections 33430 - 33449 for the disposition of the approximate .5 acre Parcel. Attachment: April 7, 2004 Agenda Report 2 000002 ATTACHMENT MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO :, The Honorable Chair and Board of Directors FROM: Hugh R. Riley, Assistant Executive Director DATE: March 30, 2004 (Agency.Meeting of April 7, 2004) SUBJECT: Sale -or Lease "of Approximately .5 Acre Remnant Parcel Adjacent to New Public Works /Parks Department Corporation Yard BACKGROUND: At the Agency's March 17; 2004 regular meeting the Board considered options for the sale or lease of an approximate .5 acre parcel - located „.at the terminus of Fitch Avenue in the Flinn Road Business Center acquired by the agency as part of a larger parcel intended for the development of a new Public Works /Parks Department Corporation Yard. During the March 17 meeting, a private party expressed interest in acquiring the property. The Board continued the item and requested staff to determine the source of funds used to acquire the property, whether the property is in the project area and if the Agency is required to obtain competitive proposals for the sale or long term lease of the property. DISCUSSION• FUNDING SOURCE FOR ACQUISITION On February 15, 2002 the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency acquired the 4.19 Acre Parcel (APN 512 -0- 150 -765) of property. The Agency used its Tax Increment funds to acquire the property and paid closing costs for a total. expense of $918,404. The property is, not within the Redevelopment Project Area. However, its proximity to the project area enabled the Agency to' determine that the public facilities intended for the property's development would serve project area residents and thus the purchase was in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan and applicable law. 000003 Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Agenda Report March 30, 2004 Page 2 During the time the Agency was in the process of acquiring the property, staff was approached by a representative from an interested party about purchasing a portion of the property. This party was advised by staff that, after plans were developed for the new corporation yard, if any part of the property was not needed for the project, they would be informed of its availability. That party has been advised that the property may be available and they have said they are still interested. MARKET VALUE OF PROPERTY As a general policy when considering the disposition of property acquired by the Agency, a fair market value would be established. The original property appraisal would be updated to establish a value and the Agency would seek to recover all of its costs in the event of a sale. CONSTRAINTS TO SALE OR LEASE OF THE PROPERTY Since Redevelopment Agency Tax Increment Funds were used to acquire the property, the disposition of the property acquired by the Agency in the project area is governed by the adopted,Redevelopment Plan. Section 421 of the Plan provides that the Agency.. "is authorized to sell, lease, exchange, subdivide, assign, encumber or otherwise dispose of any interest in real property in accordance with law. To the extent permitted by law, the Agency is authorized to dispose of real property by leases or sales by negotiation without public bidding. " The relevant provisions of State Law are found at Health and Safety Code Sections 33430 33449. Those provisions authorize disposition of real property by the Agency and describe the process required for such disposition. The Agency can dispose of the property via a bid process, in which case the property would be sold to the highest bidder. Alternatively, the Agency can select a buyer for the property without a bid process. Such selection can be after issuance of a request for- proposals, or after negotiations with an identified purchaser. In any sale that does not include a public bid process, the Agency is required to hold a public hearing to consider the sale. Additionally, pursuant to Health and. Safety Code section 33433, the Agency is required to prepare a report prior to the public hearing for any property "sold or leased for development pursuant to the redevelopment plan." The report 2 000004 Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Agenda Report March 30, 2004 Page 3 details information concerning the cost paid for the property, the proposed sale price, etc. That report would also usually describe the restrictions to be placed upon the property by the Redevelopment Plan, but given that this property is outside of the Project Area, the Plan will not restrict use of the Property. In summary, the Agency has the option to negotiate the sale of the subject property with or without obtaining competitive proposals, although certain statutory procedures will have to be followed including holding a public hearing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1) Declare the approximate .5 acre parcel as surplus property; 2) Direct staff to establish a fair market value for the property and prepare a legal description and take other actions necessary to create a separate parcel; 3) Obtain proposals from interested parties in conformance with the provisions of Section 421 of the Redevelopment Plan and Health and Safety Code Sections 33430 - 33449 for the disposition of the approximate .5 acre Parcel. Attachment: March 17, 2004 Agenda Report 3 000005 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT The Honorable Chair and Board of Directors Hugh R. Riley, Assistant Executive Director March 5, 200.4 (Agency Meeting of March 17, 20 } Options for Sale or Lease of Approximately .5 Acre Remnant Parcel Adjacent to New Public Works /Parks Department Corporation Yard BACKGROUND: On February 15, 2002 the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency acquired a 4.19 Acre Parcel (APN 512 -0- 150 -765) of property located at. the terminus of Fitch .Avenue in the Spring Road Business Park The. Paercel map containing the property. is attached.. The property was acquired as a site for the City's new Public Works /Parks Department Corporation Yard ( "Corporation Yard "). Planning and Design for the new Corporation Yard has progressed to the point where it appears that approximately 5 acre portion of the original site. will not be needed for the project:, An additional 1.06 acre portion of the property west of the _proposed: project: site is being recommended for future expansion. and use by the city's contractors for storage of materials and equipment. The subject property is presently zoned Industrial Park,.M -1 and was acquired for $6.35 per square foot. 'The. property Is currently located in a Zone B Flood Hazard Area,.however this designation is subject to change pending the outcome of a FEMA study now underway. The findings of that study might impact the property and any sale would need to include the appropriate disclosures. rrrir. Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Agenda Report March 5_, 2004 Page 2 DISCUSSION: At the time the property was recommended for acquisition, staff suggested that the Agency /City could consider the sale or lease of a portion of the site not needed for the Corporate Yard for industrial development. This was intended to occur after plans for the Corporate Yard were approved to make sure sufficient land is available for that purpose. The City Council is expected to consider a site plan for the Corporation Yard either at its April .7 or 21 meeting'. OPTIONS.FOR DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY Options availabe to the Agency for the use of this property include but are not limited to: 1. Negotiated sale of the property after soliciting competitive proposals for its development under a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA). A sale to private developer would place the property back on the tax rolls and its assessed value wiould accrue to the Agency in tax increment. 2. Long term lease for development of the property with a DDA after soliciting competitive proposals. Under either option the City will need to .subdivide, the property. The property is estimated to be valued at $8 to $10 per square foot. Staff recommends that any final decision to dispose of the property be delayed until City Council approval of final conceptual design for the new Corporation Yard. STAFF RECOhIIMENDATION Defer action until City Council approval of the final conceptual design for the new Corporation Yard. Attachments: Parcel Map 2 0000017 RANCHO SIMI =,Ar-r4 ��� ; - 51 2 - 15 �n G Tox Rote Area 1, 19 W - .!OeE)6 10054 rs 100 07 1005 - 10066 10076 ,5 Pie Re. 1 1 E5p z tt / d3► r 3l" 3&J#' 7D NEtY tdt 1 i \y"�[/ �A96 31901401 r� r TRACT ` `� �-� 90 ei 12661 F1TGH A Pfff►! �x,a_ •,n2,'S+"t f= ( 2tPM2 4 e` %1� 1 l PAR 2 i, PoctQ 4.01AC v v i f ` )_ ' 140 ' 224Ac �r �� I Pr rious Poc Na 2FP2''► ! s►Z- �sn -oz 74 : !'i 24 Z � � avE ' F � 9�• Y •, / � L,LIAIAI ro SEE DE7A1L ti 1 N 21PM2 ' ' m .- 743 48' ' �i .3ZB 9 21 R518 44 Q `r �o.0 Z .! 44.4G- Vt 1. �1 1 ( TRACT �i1lf 137 pcylo 'ig 5'l3i�l' 5s' Za3 °v 'D. l 2636 19RS52 isn'� ►l91.j0 (tR•OS) �` ! _ CA'N P(N , ' F _I (,200!' PAR / q�' 1 Z! / -c `Aj531338� '� �i:6. fir? �" L -bas. [ P. _ x 4336.725 r R-- Z -5 46RS 42 — — — — 4 - 1 39 0 _ n►> a�jes9 a - N 70 ° "" 5U13JECT PROPEKTY ' 40& 1 30' / r pm A A h N C o _ CITY OF MOORPARK 00008 viTtiJTS _E:,t� O� S Assessor's Mop 8k.512 , Pgi5 P`M S. A. Pee.evniw rae "t Agency ?meeting t cif 'r76 a / - a o0 By: L'--)' 'lTNUI;?S OFD HE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Moorpark, California April 7, 2004 A Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark was held on April 7, 2004, in the Community Center of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Hunter called the meeting to order at 7:47 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Agency Members Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Parvin, and Chair Hunter. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, Executive Director; Joseph Montes, General Counsel; Hugh Riley, Assistant Executive Director; Barry Hogan, Community Development Director; and Deborah Traffenstedt, Agency Secretary. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. 4. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Sale or Lease of Approximately .5 Acre Remnant Parcel Adjacent to New Public Works /Parks Department Corporation Yard. (continued from March 17, 2004) Staff Recommendation: 1) Declare the approximate .5 acre parcel as surplus property; 2) Direct staff to establish a fair market value for the property and prepare a legal description and take other actions necessary to create a separate parcel; and 3) Obtain proposals from interested parties in conformance with the provisions of Section 421 of the Redevelopment Plan and Health and Safety Code Sections 33430 -33449 for the disposition of the approximate .5 acre parcel. Mr. Riley gave the staff report. In response to Agency Member Mikos, Mr. Riley stated since the Agency acquired the property in question individuals have indicated interest in the property; Illii' Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency Moorpark, California Page 2 April 7, 2004 and he is recommending the Agency request competitive proposals and proceed with this type of process. Steve Hull, a Moorpark resident and business owner of Creative Wood Works, 387 Zachary Street, Moorpark, stated he is still very interested in the property for a fair price and is willing to pay fair market value, he has discussed square footage with a few architects and feels he can fit his business within the space; in this way he can keep the business here in Moorpark; and he does not have a problem going through the Competitive Bid Process to pay fair market value. Mr. Hull also indicated he is able to complete his current six month lease and then work with his current landlord on a month -to -month basis during this process. In response to Agency Member Millhouse, Mr. Riley stated he anticipates this Competitive Bid Process may be done within six months depending on how smoothly the process goes, as it is dependant on others. Mr. Riley stated he plans to get a new appraisal and other necessary paperwork processed including creation of a parcel. Mr. Montes stated that if the desire of the Board is a Competitive Bid Process there is not a statutory mandated process for staff to generate a reasonable and sufficient response from more than one very interested individual. In response to Agency Member Mikos, Mr. Kueny stated he does not recall previously sold Agency property using a Competitive Bid Process. In response to Agency Member Mikos, Mr. Montes, advised there are a couple different processes one can engage in. He mentioned a sealed bid process allowing 14 - 30 days for interested individuals to submit bids then open all bids at same time; a sealed bid process, but then allow auction procedure once bids have been opened; or alternatively, request proposal and what plans and /or use are in mind for the property enabling Agency to consider best use and enhancement. In response to Chair Hunter, Mr. Montes, advised the Agency, with the assistance of staff, would establish 000010 Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency Moorpark, California Page 3 April 7, 2004 the process, criteria, and ground rules as to what the Agency wants submitted with the proposal. Mr. Kueny added that the Agency has other options as identified in staff recommended action No. 3 and gave the example of how the Giesler Field property had been divided and sold. Mr. Kueny recommended the Agency at a minimum take action on staff recommended action Nos. 1 and 2 and reschedule No. 3 for April 21, 2004. The Agency can also consider the disposition of the property as a Closed Session item. He stated the goals are to obtain fair market value, full cost recovery, and consider number of jobs to be generated. He stated that the other two parties that have expressed interest would bring fewer jobs. Mr. Kueny stated he anticipates the process to last 18 months prior to the building being occupied, as a Disposition and Development Agreement will need to be executed, the Planned Development Permit process to complete, before the start of construction. Mr. Hull stated that he would like to build on the property from scratch and believes his proposal will be a good asset to the City of Moorpark. Mr. Kueny stated that if the Agency entered into an Agreement it would request a commitment from Mr. Hull to complete the process and build by a certain time. Mr. Hull stated he is willing to work with the Agency. Chair Hunter stated he wants to move the process as efficiently as possible and wants to know who the successful bidder is within 60 - 90 days. MOTION: Agency Member Millhouse moved and Agency Member Parvin seconded a motion to approve recommended actions Nos. 1 and 2 with action No. 3 to be placed on the April 21, 2004, Agency agenda in the event the Agency is ready to act on matter. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: MOTION: Agency Member Harper moved and Agency Member Parvin seconded a motion to adopt the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. 000011, Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency Moorpark, California Page 4 April 7, 2004 A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 17, 2004. Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes. 6. CLOSED SESSION: Mr. Kueny requested the Agency recess the meeting and reconvene into closed session for discussion of Items 6.C., 6.D., and 6.E. at the conclusion of the City Council meeting. AT THIS POINT in the meeting, a recess was declared. The time was 8:03 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:32 p.m. MOTION: Agency Member Harper moved and Agency Member Parvin seconded a motion to adjourn to closed session for discussion of Items 6.C., 6.D., and 6.E. on the agenda. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Pursuant to Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code) Mission Bell Plaza Phase II, LLC, a California limited partnership vs. Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO28906) D. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: (APN 511 -0- 080 -355) Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager /Executive Director Negotiating Parties: The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency and James R. Birkenshaw Et Al Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment E. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: (APN 512 -0- 090 -105) Agency Negotiator: Steven Kueny, City Manager /Executive Director Negotiating Parties: The Moorpark Redevelopment Agency and Atreko, Inc. Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment Present in closed session were Agency Members Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Parvin, and Chair Hunter; Steven Kueny, 000012 Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency Moorpark, California Paqe 5 April 7, 2004 Executive Director; Joseph Montes, General Counsel; Hugh Riley, Assistant Executive Director; Barry Hogan, Community Development Director; and Deborah Traffenstedt, Agency Secretary. The Agency reconvened into open session at 10:55 p.m. Mr. Kueny announced that Items 6.C., 6.D., and 6.E. were discussed and that there was no action to report. 7. ADJOURNMENT: Chair Hunter adjourned the meeting at 10:55 p.m. Patrick Hunter, Chair ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt Agency Secretary 000013