Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2007 0307 RDA REGM" `( ESTABLISHED * i MANN 11L 168y JFOA *t OFJ� Resolution No. 2006 -172 MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULAR MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MARCH 7, 2007 7:00 P.M. Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: 3. PUBLIC COMMENT: 4. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Amendment to Agreement with Urban Futures, Inc, for Professional Consulting Services with Fees Totaling $63,500 for the Preparation of an Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan to Restore Eminent Domain Authority. Staff Recommendation: Approve an Amendment to the Agreement with Urban Futures, Inc. for Professional Services, subject to final scope of work and language approval by the Executive Director and Agency Counsel. ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED (Staff: David Moe) 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED) A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of January 17, 2007. Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes. B. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of February 7, 2007. Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes. C. Consider Resolution Authorizing Mid -Year Amendments to 2006/07 Fiscal Year Budget. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2007 - ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED (Staff: Johnny Ea) Redevelopment Agency Agenda March 7, 2007 Page 2 6. CLOSED SESSION: A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code: (Number of cases to be discussed - 4) 7. ADJOURNMENT: Any member of the public may address the Agency during the Public Comments portion of the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or a Presentation /Action /Discussion item. Speakers who wish to address the Agency concerning a Public Hearing or Presentations /Action/ Discussion item must do so during the Public Hearing or Presentations /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker cards must be received by the City Clerk for Public Comments prior to the beginning of the Public Comments portion of the meeting and for Presentation /Action /Discussion items prior to the beginning of the first item of the Presentation /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda. Speaker Cards for a Public Hearing must be received prior to the beginning of the Public Hearing. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Comment and Presentation/ Action /Discussion item speaker. A limitation of three to five minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Hearing item speaker. Written Statement Cards may be submitted in lieu of speaking orally for open Public Hearings and Presentation /Action /Discussion items. Copies of each item of business on the agenda are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for public review. Any questions concerning any agenda item may be directed to the City Clerk at (805) 517 -6223. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to review an agenda or participate in this meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, please contact the City Clerk's Division at (805) 517 -6223. Upon request, the agenda can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Any request for disability- related modification or accommodation should be made at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled meeting to assist the City staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting (28 CFR 35.102- 35.104; ADA Title II). STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss CITY OF MOORPARK ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Maureen Benson, declare as follows: That I am the Deputy City Clerk of the City of Moorpark and that a notice for a Regular Meeting of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency to be held Wednesday, March 7, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Moorpark Community Center, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, was posted on March 2, 2007, at a conspicuous place at the Moorpark Community Center, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 2, 2007. Maureen Benson Deputy City Clerk CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA Redevelopment Agency Meeting T'E`EM of ! 3 -? A00 '7 l ITEM ACTION- REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Chair and Agency Board Members FROM: David C. Moe II, Redevelopment Manager L)0�? (f'�'PD DATE: February 23, 2007 (Agency Meeting of 03!7107) SUBJECT: Consider an Amendment to the Agreement with Urban Futures, Inc. for Professional Consulting Services with Fees Totaling $63,500 for the Preparation of an Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan BACKGROUND On April 6, 2005, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark approved an agreement with Urban Futures, Inc. (UFI) to assist the Agency with the preparation and processing of an amendment to the Moorpark Redevelopment Plan to restore eminent domain authority. A Project Area Committee ( "PAC ") was formed on October 5, 2005, to collaborate with Agency staff and UFI in regard to the Agency's authority to use eminent domain to acquire property. Four meetings were held by the PAC, but on March 1, 2006, the Agency defined the Amendment and forwarded it to the PAC for review and comment. The proposed amendment was defined as the following: The Agency would have the authority to acquire property zoned commercial and industrial through eminent domain, as provided by Ordinance 111, and have limited authority to acquire residentially zoned property. The Agency would have the ability to acquire residential property with a density of 14 dwelling units per acre or higher; any residential property, not occupied by the original owner since June 28, 1989, in a certain geographic area called the "Focus Area "; and any vacant residentially zoned property throughout the Project Area, provided the property has been vacant since June 28, 1989 ( "Amendment "). The PAC completed its review of the proposed Amendment on June 8, 2006. The PAC did not agree with the Amendment as proposed by the Agency. The PAC made the recommendation to the City Council to limit the Agency's ability to acquire property by utilizing eminent domain to properties zoned commercial and industrial, as provided by Ordinance 111. 000001 Moorpark Redevelopment agency March 7, 2007 Page 2 DISCUSSION The November 2006 election had a very important proposition on the voting ballot called "Proposition 90 ". This Proposition was targeted towards redevelopment agencies, but essentially would have stopped all government agency acquisitions through eminent domain. Staff decided to halt the process to adopt the Amendment until Proposition 90 was decided by the voters of California. Proposition 90 was defeated at the voting polls by a 52.3% to 47.7% vote; however a series of bills were signed by the Governor affecting the process for government agencies to acquire property by the use of eminent domain and affecting redevelopment plan adoptions /amendments. At the Agency's request, UFI provided a proposal to amend the existing professional service agreement to amend the scope of work and include the changes to Redevelopment Law, which became state law effective January 1 of this year, in the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment. Said proposal has been included in the proposed second amendment to the UFI professional service contact (Attachment 1). SUPPLEMENTAL WORK TASKS Task 1: Related Tasks Management/Scheduling and Meeting Attendance Task 2: Conduct in- office analysis to determine which portion of the Project Area will require parcel specific blight analysis; prepare field reconnaissance materials e.g., Base and Assessor Parcel Maps Task 3: Preparation of physical and economic blight analysis, including parcel specific blight reconnaissance in the Project Area physical blight Indicators in -field reconnaissance (Primary) UFI will conduct parcel specific field reconnaissance (windshield) to assess the presence and prevalence of blight indicators within the Project Area. The field reconnaissance will consider the presence and degree of physical blight indicators that can be categorized under CCRL Section 33031(a), and CCRL Section 33030(c). Physical Blight Indicators Include: i) the condition of buildings, building sites, and other structures; ii) land use incompatibility, development pattern issues, and relationships to present general plan and zoning standards and market conditions; iii) indications of functional and external obsolescence; iv) inadequate public improvements or inadequate water or sewer utilities; v) infrastructure and traffic /circulation deficiencies; vi) other problems that might exacerbate existing blight and that fall within CCRL Sections 33031(a) and 33030(c) blight definitions. 0 00002 Moorpark Redevelopment agency March 7, 2007 Page 3 Secondary Database Analysis In concert with the field reconnaissance effort, and to help achieve the objectives outlined above, UFI will complete a review and analysis of data and documents provided by the Agency and other third party sources. The review will identify and describe deleterious conditions present within the Project Area, and that are not discernable during the course of field reconnaissance including: i) number and location of building code violations, ii) problem planning and code enforcement areas, iii) age of construction and presence of toxic building materials, iv) age and condition of subgrade infrastructure, and v) location of hazardous waste sites. Economic Blight Indicators The economic blight assessment will be prepared by Alfred Gobar Associates ( "AGA') Conditions to be evaluated by AGA are: • Depreciated or Stagnant Property Values • Adequacy of Commercial Facilities • Overcrowded Housing and Poverty • Public Safety Risk and Related Economic Burden To help gauge the Agency's effectiveness to date in eradicating blight, UFI and AGA will compare conditions defined in the previously prepared Report to the City Council and other documents, including Agency CCRL 33490 Implementation Plans. Task 4: Conduct computer field data entry including land use and blight data; prepare blight analysis exhibits; weight blight indicators by parcel; prepare blight gradient exhibits. Task 5: Revise Report to Council to incorporate blight analyses prepared under tasks 3- 4 above Task 6: Related CEQA process coordination Task 7: Respond to staff comments on draft Agency Report to Council and finalize the same. 000003 Moorpark Redevelopment agency March 7, 2007 Page 4 Task 8: As appropriate and necessary, work with Agency staff and City Clerk's office to ensure compliance with newly enacted [2006] CCRL Sections 33456 (a), and 33373(c) Task 9: As appropriate and necessary, modify the previously prepared Ordinance to comply with newly enacted [2006] CCRL Section 33342.7(a) TOTAL FEE $ 63,500 STAFF RECOMMENDATION (ROLL CALL VOTE) 1. Approve an Amendment to the Agreement with Urban Futures, Inc. for Professional Services subject to final scope of work and language approval by the Agency Counsel and the Executive Director. 2. Authorize Executive Director to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Agency. Attachment I: Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services 000004 Attachment I SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ( "Second Amendment "), is made and entered into this day of , 200 , ( "the Effective Date ") between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark, hereinafter referred to as "AGENCY ", and Urban Futures, Inc. hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT ". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, April 25, 2005, the AGENCY and the CONSULTANT entered into an Agreement for Professional Consulting Services for preparation of the second amendment to the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the following additional services, not covered by the original Professional Services Agreement, are requested by the AGENCY: 1. Conduct additional activities as identified in Exhibit "A ". NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, benefits, and premises herein stated, the parties hereto agree as follows: AGENCY does hereby appoint CONSULTANT in a contractual capacity to perform the services in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A" of Second Amendment, CONSULTANT'S Proposal, with the authorities, and responsibility ordinarily granted to this type of consultant work. All other terms and conditions of the original agreement shall remain in full force and effect. MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Steven Kueny Executive Director Date: ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Agency Secretary CONSULTANT Marshall F. Lynn President Date: Page 1 of 2 UUUUU5 EXHIBIT A URBAN FUTURES INCORPOR.XTED Finance • Redevelopment - Implementation - Planning - Bond Administration February 5, 2007 David Moe, Redevelopment Manager City of Moorpark Redevelopment Agency 799 Moorpark Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 Re: Supplemental Proposal to Complete Blight Analysis and Related Tasks Necessary to complete the Proposed Amendment (eminent domain) to the Moorpark Redevelopment Plan Dear David, Per your request, please find included herewith the UFI proposal to complete the blight analyses and related work tasks now necessary to complete the proposed and on -going Redevelopment Plan Amendment (eminent domain) to the Moorpark Redevelopment Plan. The proposal incorporates all new requirements established under SBs 1206, 1809, 53 and other newly adopted bills affecting redevelopment plan adoptions /amendments which are to be codified within the CCRL statutes, and that became state law effective January 1, of this year. With these new requirements in mind, in addition to our own in -house blight discovery and analysis techniques, our overall approach (and amended professional services fee) provides for an economic blight analysis to be prepared by the offices of Alfred Gobar Associates, economists. As you have discussed with Jon Huffman, we believe that the inclusion of AGA in this endeavor is extremely important because of the intense focus on the presence of economic blight as a precursor to amend /adopt a redevelopment plan. This proposal is supplemental to all previously submitted UFI proposals /supplemental proposals. Please note that it does not invalidate previous work scopes or fees contained in the previously transmitted proposal documents. We look forward to hearing from you regarding this matter. Sincerely, URBAN FUTURES, INC. Marshall Linn Crestview Corporate Center - 3111 N. Tustin Avenue, Suite 230, Orange, CA 92865 -1753 000006 Telephone: (714) 283 -9334 General e-mail: planning @urbanfuturesinc.com Fax: (714) 283 -9319 Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Supplemental Blight Analysis Proposal GENERAL APPROACH TO BLIGHT DISCOVERY, RECORDATION AND ANALYSES INFIELD In order to successfully document the prevalence and substantiality of physical and economic blighting conditions within the Project Area UFI has identified 40 physical conditions (the 'Blight Indicators ") determined to be adverse to the public health, safety, and welfare derived from a review of the following sources, and which will be evaluated at a parcel specific level': i) CCRL Section 33031(a) (physical blight indicators), Section 33031(b) (economic blight indicators),and Section 33030 (c) (inadequate public improvements2), ii) Uniform Housing Code, iii) Uniform Building Code, iv) California Penal Code, v) California Building Code, vi) California Electric and Fire Codes, and vii) California Vehicle Code. A catalog of this preliminary list of Blight Indicators is included herewith as Attachment A, which is intended to provide a standard set of deleterious conditions not necessarily tailored to Moorpark. The parcel specific blight analysis will be crafted around an in -field reconnaissance effort, which will include the recordation of physical (including CCRL Section 33030(c) indicators)3 and economic° Blight Indicators found to exist on each parcel, using mapping and digital photography techniques. THIRD PARTY DATABASE REVIEW The presence and degree of physical blight indicators (including CCRL Section 33030(c) indicators) that cannot be determined as an aspect of the field audit will be evaluated by UFI using methods and sources including review and analysis of third party databases (City building department for building code violations, City public works for inadequate sewer or water utilities, and County assessor records to determine ownership patterns as examples). Similarly, area wide economic Blight Indicators, including depreciated or stagnant property values or impaired investments, cannot be appropriately evaluated as part of the in -field audit and, therefore, will be evaluated by Alfred GobarAssociates (AGA) through the use of electronic appraisal and U.S. Census block -group data, FBI crime statistics, and other sources and techniques described in subsequent sections of this Proposal. ' Parcel specific analysis will apply only to those parcels determined to require such focus. This determination will be made following review of ariel images and discussions with staff. Generally speaking, recent development and vacant land will not require parcel specific analysis. 2 These conditions are in addition to CCRL Section 33031(a) and (b), and therefore, cannot be used as a primary basis for redevelopment project area delineation and adoption. 3 To the extent that physical blight indicators can be identified "on the ground." Generally, field reconnaissance will reveal numerous physical blight conditions codified under CCRL Section 33031(a), including: buildings in which it is unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work...; buildings that demonstrate substandard, defective, or obsolete design or construction...; adjacent or nearby incompatible land uses...; and the existence of subdivided lots that are in multiple ownership and whose physical development has been impaired...; and CCRL Section 33030(c), including the existence of inadequate public improvements. 4 To the extent that economic blight indicators can be identified "on the ground." Generally, field reconnaissance will reveal numerous economic blight conditions codified under CCRL Section 33031(b), including: properties containing hazardous waste, abnormally high business vacancies and rate of abandoned buildings, residential overcrowding, excess number of adult businesses, and other conditions that may constitute a serious threat to the public safety and welfare. February 2007 Z \OOProposalslMoorpark1MP002 BlightAnalysis wpd L rpl_2/6/07 000001 Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Supplemental Blight Analysis Proposal SUPPLEMENTAL WORK TASKS Task 1: Related Tasks Management/Scheduling and Meeting Attendance Task 2: Conduct In- Office Analysis to Determine Which Portion of the Project Area Will Require Parcel Specific Blight Analysis; Prepare Field Reconnaissance Materials e.g., Base, and Assessor Parcel Maps Task 3: Preparation of Physical and Economic Blight Analysis,5 Including Parcel Specific Blight Reconnaissance in the Project Area Physical Blight Indicators In -field Reconnaissance (Primary) UFI will conduct parcel specific field reconnaissance (windshield) to assess the presence and prevalence of Blight Indicators within the Project Area. The field reconnaissance will consider the presence and degree of physical Blight Indicators that can be categorized under CCRL Section 33031(a), and CCRL Section 33030(c). Physical Blight Indicators include: i) the condition of buildings, building sites, and other structures; ii) land use incompatibility and development pattern issues and relationships to present general plan and zoning standards and market conditions; iii) indications of functional and external obsolescence; iv) inadequate public improvements, or inadequate water or sewer utilities; v) infrastructure and traffic /circulation deficiencies; and vi) other problems that might exacerbate existing blight and that fall within CCRL Sections 33031(a) and 33030(c) blight definitions. Secondary Database Analysis In concert with the field reconnaissance effort, and to help achieve the objectives outlined above, UFI will complete a review and analysis of data and documents provided by the Agency and other third party sources, which identify and describe deleterious conditions present within the Project Area, and that are not discernable during the course of field reconnaissance including: i) number and location of building code violations, ii) problem planning and code enforcement areas, iii) age of construction and presence of toxic building materials, iv) age and condition of subgrade infrastructure, and v) location of hazardous waste sites. Economic Blight Indicators The economic blight assessment will be prepared by AGA as described in the scope of work included as Attachment C, included herewith. Conditions to be evaluated by AGA are: Depreciated or Stagnant Property Values Adequacy of commercial Facilities 5 The UFI approach to field reconnaissance, blight discovery, and analysis is shown in Attachment B, included herewith. February 2007 Z. WOPfoposals \Moorpark \MP002_BhgnlAnalysis wpd 3 rpi_216107 _ ` O " 0 C CS Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Supplemental Blight Analysis Proposal Overcrowded Housing and Poverty Public Safety Risk and Related Economic Burden To help gauge the Agency's effectiveness to date in eradicating blight, UFI and AGA will compare conditions defined in the previously prepared Report to the City Council and other documents, including Agency CCRL 33490 Implementation Plans. Task 4: Conduct Computer Field Data Entry Including Land Use and Blight Data; Prepare Blight Analysis Exhibits; Weight Blight Indicators by Parcel; Prepare Blight Gradient Exhibits Task 5: Revise Report to Council to Incorporate Blight Analyses prepared under tasks 3-4 Above Task 6: Related CEQA Process Coordination Task 7: Respond to Staff Comments on Draft Agency Report to Council and Finalize the Same Task 8: As appropriate and necessary work with Agency staff and City Clerk's office to ensure compliance with newly enacted [2006] CCRL Sections 33456 (a), and 33373(c) Task 9: As Appropriate and Necessary Modify the Previously Prepared Ordinance to comply with newly enacted [2006] CCRL Section 33342.7(a) FEE SCHEDULE UFI will complete those work items as specified in the described Scope of Work for a fixed professional services fee of $63,500. This supplemental scope of work and proposal provides that UFI staff will include two (2) staff meetings at City Hall per Agency staff direction. Additional meetings /work tasks can be completed by UFI based upon hourly rates shown on Attachment D. 2. Not included in our professional services fee are direct expense items such as postage mailing costs, Federal Express, electronic data files, printing and travel costs, etc. These items will be invoiced to the client on a cost - plus -10% administrative /handling fee. This professional services fee does include the professional services of AGA as described in Attachment C included herewith. Additional meetings /work tasks can be completed by AGA based upon hourly rates also included in Attachment C. February 2007 Z \ OOProposalsWoorparkWP002 _BlightAnalysis wpo 4 rpl_2 /6107 000009 ATTACHMENT * # CODE Point BLIGHT INDICATORS 1 AB 2 Adult Business (pornography, liquor, bars) (b)(6) ** 2 AEH 5 Apparent Electrical Hazards (a)(1), (a)(2) S 3 ANPA 10 Addition Not Permitted (Room Addition /Alteration, etc.) (a)(1), (a)(2) S 4 ANPB 5 Patio Cover (or other minor construction) Not Permitted (a)(1), (a)(2) 5 SS 5 Secondary Structures 6 AS 2 Appurtenant Structure 7 BAR 2 Bars on Doors/Windows (b)(7) 8 BO 5 Boarded Occupied (a)(1) 9 BU 10 Boarded Unoccupied (a)(1), (a)(2) S 10 ESW 20 Exterior Structure Support Walls (potential for collapse) (a)(1), (a)(2) 11 FBW 2 Fence /Block Wall /Other outdoor wall structures (a)(1), (a)(2) 12 JFCM 5 Faulty Construction Materials (a)(1), (a)(2) 13 IFEN 2 Fenestration - windows, screens, doors (a)(1), (a)(2) 14 JFH 10 Fire Hazards (Structure or Severe Site Issue) (a)(1), (a)(2) 15 JFME 5 Deteriorated Fixtures /Mechanical Equipment/HVAC (a)(1), (a)(2) 16 FND 10 Foundation (a)(1), (a)(2) S 17 FO 10 Functional Obsolescence (ad hoc change of use) (a)(2) 18 G 2 Graffiti (b)(7) S 19 GC 10 Garage Conversion Not Permitted (a)(1), (a)(2) 20 ICLU 10 Incompatible Land Uses (a)(3) — only with a vacant lot) 21 IE 10 Poor Site Ingress /Egress (including emergency vehicle access) (a)(2) S 1 22 JIEX 10 Inadequate or impaired access to Building Exits (a)(1), (a)(2) S 23 ILD 5 Inadequate Loading /Docking Facilities (a)(2) 24 INF 5 Potential of Infestation of Rodents or Insects (a)(1) 25 IP 10 Irregular Parcel (a)(4) S 26 IV 2 Inoperable Vehicles (a)(1) 27 OPR 5 Obstruction of Public ROW 33303(c) 28 OV 5 Overgrown /Hazardous Vegetation (a)(2) 29 P 5 Paint - related issues (a)(1) 30 PDL 2 Presence of Payday Lenders or Pawn Shops (b)(6) * Note to send list of affected parcel numbers to Agency /City staff for research /clarification purposes. #* Typical reference to CCRL Code Sections 33031. Z =UFI Forms\Field Work\00Bhght_Weight Point.Base.doc Page 1 of 2 rpl 09/28/06/ 000010 00010 * # CODE Point BLIGHT INDICATORS 31 PQ 5 Poor Construction Quality /Corrugated Steel /Building Type (Marshall and Swift) (a)(2) 32 PRI 5 Deteriorated /Absent Private Infrastructure (a)(2) 33 PSL 5 Poor Site Layout (exceed FAR, access to parking, onsite circulation, turning radius) (a)(2) 34 PUI 5 Deteriorated /Absent Public Infrastructure Street, Curb, Parking Issues, Gutter, Sidewalk, utility (specify which) 33030(c) 35 IR 10 Roofs (a)(1) 36 JSCF 2 Security Fencing (b)(7) 37 SD 5 Substandard Design (structure) (a)(2) 38 UM 10 Apparent Unreinforced Masonry (a)(1), (a)(2) 39 UST 5 Unsafe Missing Stairways or Walkways (a)(1) 40 WP 5 Weather Protection, holes in plaster /stucco/wood (a)(1) Z \OOUFI Forms\Field Work \OOBlight_Weight_Point.Base.doc Page 2 of 2 rpl 09/28/06 000011 ATTACHMENT TO BLIGHT INDICATOR CODES New Method 1. Every parcel within 300 feet of a "20 pointer" gets an External Obsolescence indicators = a. within 100 feet ...........7 points' b. 100 — 200 feet ............ 5 points' c. 200 — 300 feet ............ 3 points* 2. Every parcel that gets an ICLU is processed the same as (1) above. ICLU indicators on one parcel only — the offender 3. UFI to call City and see if the following are violations: IV all (S) items 4. Research all ICLU 5. Research all IP * Does not add to blight points for the EO's 00001 C O u0 1A C4 Project Area Delineation Approach Identification and Assessment of Degree of Urbanization, Blight Indicators and Minimum Standard Thresholds V.v.v.lh Substantial & Prevalent Laver blight wx �.ment Laver 1 Fourida, tiun Prepared by URBAN FUTURES, INC. ` "ePIanning Group Redevelopment — Environmental — Land Use Planning Otacea located at 3111 N. Tustin Street, Suite 230 Orange. CA 92965 ATTACHMENT B I. Urbanization Analysis (Pamw specfc analyaaa of and uae and Mtassw daft, and nN{aW of Sanborrt m s and taa9monials "' '� _'uDlPx R351derhii �. ❑ ride Stn31 ® rdustrial Auto Relat =! ❑ '- 'u!i- Family Reslder!r,! Ae Hume Res:.je t a � ,i:qh. I .dndq p.• .r,i.: On a parcel -by- parcel basis, document existing land uses in the study area for project qualification. To qualify for redevelopment, the delineated area must be at least 80% urbanized. Ila. Primary Blight Discovery & Documentation Layer 1 (Parcel spKft anayala «blight Mice lwalgirteQ r 1. PARCEL LEVEL SURVEY Field Team identifies and records on field notes all applicable "Blight Indicators" for each parcel. Documented conditions must meet or exceed conditions contained in the "minimum standard thresholds" catalog used as a reference by the Field Team. Consistent with California Redevelopment Law, data are collected on various economic and physical conditions determined to be "conditions that cause blight." 3. DATA SCORING 2. DATA INPUT Field notes are input into spreadsheets and onto maps, as appropriate. C 0 1,4 4. SURVEY ASSESSMENT REPORT Each Blight Indicator is assigned a value between 2 and 20, with each successively higher score indicating a more significant condition of blight. Total per - parcel -score is derived from the sum of values assigned to Blight Indicator(s) for each parcel. 5. MAP TRANSLATION AND INDICATOR THRESHOLD MAP WEIGHTED BLIGHT INDICATORS Under 19 20 and above For a parcel to be considered as exhibiting substantial "conditions of blight," it must accumulate at least 20 Blight Indicator points and must also have at least one Blight Indicator condition with a rating of no less than 5. For an area to be considered as exhibiting "prevalent conditions of blight," it must have a reasonably sufficient number of parcels that exhibit substantial conditions of blight so that cumulatively, they can be found to be a burden on the community. The ultimate geographic configuration of an area is directly related to the degree of parcel- specific conditions of blight and other criteria discussed in this brochure. IIb. Existing Records & Database Research Laver 2 (Area wide economic amW to Include: .odaaonomic *50eceenent aid overcrowding, public ea * 6* field burden, and Impalrm«da to hi=) 1311Rh t lssecsrnenf Review and analyze available database resources, including the U.S. Census and other public records related to: demographic and real estate trends; police and fire statistics; county health; code enforcement; and public works records. When combined with Layer 1 data, these Layer 2 data are important in assisting in or confirming the determination that blight is both substantial and prevalent. Bl i;, ►t t Laver I + Laver 2 Assessment Layer 1 plus Layer 2 must provide evidence sufficient for the legislative body to find the area is blighted and the blight is both substantial and prevalent. III. Necessary For Effective Redevelopment (Planning analyeea to Include General Plan review, all to ensure Intea><ed pleaning) 4,r .. Substantial A PrevaleiNl The California Redevelopment Law permits inclusion of non - blighted parcels that are determined, pursuant to specific conditions, to be necessary for effective redevelopment (e.g., modem planning, affordable housing, replacement housing, etc.). It is important to note that Project Area selection is the ultimate responsibility of the City Council, which will base its determination on data and analyses contained in the official record of proceedings. (bp ri& c- 2003 Urban!•utures, Inc ATTACHMENT C ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES December 5, 2006 Mr. Jon Huffman URBAN FUTURES, INC. 3111 N. Tustin Avenue, Suite 230 Orange, CA 92865 Sent Via Mail & Email: jonh @urbanfuturesinc.com Subject: Economic Blight Assessment – Moorpark, California Dear Jon: ACA J�- I Our understanding is an economic blight analysis is required in connection with an amendment to establish eminent domain authority in selected portions of the existing Project Area. The existing Project Area covers a substantial portion of the community and hosts a wide variety of developed land use (residential, retail, industrial, etc.). In order to amend the Redevelopment Plan to authorize the use of eminent domain, blight conditions must persist in the Project Area that are substantial and prevalent. The law does not explicitly limit the assessment of blight conditions to those selected portions of the Project Area where eminent domain authority is proposed. Also beginning in 2007, economic conditions found to indicate blight must now comply with SB1206 and corresponding amendments to the Community Redevelopment Law. Finally, the City of Moorpark is requesting rapid completion of the assessment in order to facilitate an April 2007 release of the Blight Assessment report for agency and public review. This proposal addresses recommended research to assess and evaluate conditions indicative of economic blight. Economic blight cannot be readily assessed at a parcel - specific level due to the reporting limits of reliable data sources used to assess economic conditions. Instead, the investigation of economic blight must consider factors not readily identified by a visual inspection. A reasonably objective assessment of economic blight conditions must rely on diverse sources of data that may not readily describe the precise boundary of the Study Area. The economic blight analysis for Moorpark, therefore, begins with an assessment of available data sources to determine which of the following economic conditions to investigate on a priority basis: ■ Depreciated or Stagnant Property Values • Adequacy of Commercial Facilities • Overcrowded Housing and Poverty • Public Safety Risk and Related Economic Burden For the Study Area to suffer from economic blight, only one economic condition must exist. Our recommended approach is to begin an evaluation of multiple economic conditions since blighted areas are often impacted by multiple impediments to economic growth. The research objective corresponding to each condition noted above is summarized as follows: ■ Property Value Analysis – to determine the extent underlying land value has failed to keep pace with comparable land use in the surrounding market area. Stagnant 300 So. Harbor Blvd., Suite 900, Anaheim, CA 92805 -3721 (714) 772 -8900 (714) 772 - 8911 -FAX 000015 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES Mr. Jon Huffman February 6, 2007 Page 2 property values are a manifestation of economic circumstances limiting the utilization of property. Adequacy of Commercial Facilities — to determine the extent study area commercial facilities that provide needed retail products and services to neighborhood residents are lacking and extent existing commercial facilities are otherwise plagued by excess vacancies, inordinately low lease rates, and technically obsolete conditions that hinder economically viable commercial use. Overcrowded Housing and Poverty — to determine housing occupancy and income levels within the Study Area using latest information from Bureau of Census and local service agencies compiling records of housing occupancy and resident income. Overcrowded housing and poverty reflect living circumstances closely associated with conditions of economic and social displacement and crime and public safety problems. Public Safety Risk — investigation of Police and Fire response call data for the Study Area and comparable land use in other portions of Moorpark to determine the extent residents and businesses suffer excessive public safety risk (crime and fire hazard risk) and the City incurs an undue fiscal burden to serve the area. Also considered is the prevalence of businesses catering exclusively to adults that require an inordinate share of resources to investigate and suppress criminal activity. To meet the April 2007 completion time frame we will need authorization to proceed by the third week in January. Alfred Gobar Associates regularly evaluates condition indicative of economic blight and has prepared numerous studies for such communities as Murrieta, Upland, Soledad, Manteca, Gridley, Hanford, and Kings County, to name a few. Our approach in assessing blight relies on research principals and methodologies regularly used in economic development and real estate market studies prepared for public agency, private investor, and developer clients. For your benefit, we also maintain a modest website describing our research capabilities at www.gobar.com. Very truly yours, ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES Alonzo Pedrin Principal MOORPARK ECON BLIGHT SCOPE JAN -07 000016 CURRENT UFI PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE Principal ............................ $185.00 per hour Principal Planner ...................... 115.00 per hour Senior Planner ....................... 105.00 per hour Staff Planner ......................... 75.00 per hour Planning Assistant .................... 45.00 per hour Planning Technician ................... 35.00 per hour Telephone, printing, duplication, reproduction, postage, legal description, state filing fees and other out -of- pocket expenses including funds fronted on behalf of the client, are billed at cost plus 10% to cover administrative costs. 00001' ,;tr`; OF MOGRf'AftK t: A! sI IiA Redevelooment Acsricy Meeting ITEM of ACTION: - -S OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY —� Moorpark, Californian - January 17, 2007 A Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark was held on January 17, 2007, in the Community Center of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Hunter called the meeting to order at 8:44 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Agency Members Mikos, Millhouse, Parvin, Van Dam, and Chair Hunter. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, Executive Director; Joseph Montes, General Counsel; Hugh Riley, Assistant Executive Director; David Moe, Redevelopment Manager; and Deborah Traffenstedt, Agency Secretary. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. 4. PRESENTATION/ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider Lease Agreement with Moorpark Chamber of Commerce for Office Building and Parking at 18 High Street. Staff Recommendation: Approve lease agreement, subject to final language approval by the Executive Director and General Counsel. Chair Hunter presented the details of the lease agreement. In response to Chair Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated there were no speakers. MOTION: Mayor Hunter moved and Councilmember Parvin seconded a motion to approve the lease agreement with Moorpark Chamber of Commerce for office building and parking at 18 High Street, subject to final language approval by the Executive Director and General Counsel. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 1300015 Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency Moorpark, California Page 2 January 17 2007 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ROLL CALL VOTE REQUIRED) CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Agency to pull Item 5.F. from the agenda for individual consideration upon the request of Chair Hunter. MOTION: Agency Member Mikos moved and Agency Member Parvin seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item 5.F, which was pulled for individual consideration. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meetina of December 6. 2006. Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes. B. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular Meeting of December 6, 2006. Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes. C. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of December 20, 2006. Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes. D. Consider Approving Relocation Plan for 765 Walnut Street. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Relocation Plan for 765 Walnut Street. E. Consider Approving Replacement Housing Plan for 765 Walnut Street. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Replacement Housing Plan for 765 Walnut Street. At this point in the meeting Item 5.F. was pulled for individual consideration: F. Consider Issuance of a Reauest for Qualifications from Developers for a High Density Residential Ownership Project. Staff Recommendation: Authorize razing of both structures at 765 Walnut and clearance of the property, and securing a market rate tenant for 798 Moorpark Avenue; authorize the Executive Director to execute lease of rear building at 782 Moorpark Avenue to the American Legion at $1.00 per year; and direct staff to issue a Request for Qualifications from developers for a high - density residential- ownership project. Chair Hunter stated he pulled this item as the leasing of the rear building at 782 Moorpark Avenue is premature and he would like this to return as a separate item on a future agenda. MOTION: Chair Hunter moved and Agency Member Parvin seconded a motion to authorize razing of both structures at 765 Walnut and clearance of the property; securing a market rate tenant for 798 Moorpark Avenue; direct staff to issue a Request for Qualifications from developers for a high- density residential - ownership project; and schedule discussion of leasing the rear building at 782 000019 Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency Moorpark, California Page 3 January 17, 2007 Moorpark Avenue for a future agenda. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 6. CLOSED SESSION: Mr. Kueny requested the Agency recess the meeting and reconvene into closed session for a discussion of Item 6.C. at the conclusion of the City Council meeting. AT THIS POINT in the meeting, a recess was declared. The time was 8:52 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:00 p.m. MOTION: Agency Member Millhouse moved and Agency Member Parvin seconded a motion to adjourn to closed session for discussion of Item 6.C. on the agenda. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The time was 9:00 p.m. C. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8) Property: 250 East Los Angeles Avenue (APN 506 -0- 020 -130) Agency Negotiator: Moorpark Redevelopment Agency- Steven Kueny, Executive Director Negotiating Parties: Steven A. Valenza Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment Present in closed session were Agency Members Mikos, Millhouse, Parvin, Van Dam, and Chair Hunter; Steven Kueny, Executive Director; Joseph Montes, General Counsel; Hugh Riley, Assistant Executive Director; Barry Hogan, Community Development Director; David Moe, Redevelopment Director; Captain Jeff Matson; and Deborah Traffenstedt, Agency Secretary. The Agency reconvened into open session at 9:01 p.m. Mr. Kueny announced that Item 6.C. was discussed and that there was no action to report. 7. ADJOURNMENT: Chair Hunter adjourned the meeting at 9:01 p.m. Patrick Hunter, Chair ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt Agency Secretary 000020 . •,av- !Opm?ra .�.;•rr•v rlleftihg -5 • rrEM -Aooh VVV OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Moorpark, California February 7, 2006 A Special Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark was held on February 7, 2006, in the Community Center of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. CALL TO ORDER: Deborah Traffenstedt, City Clerk /Agency Secretary, called the meeting to order at 5:08 p.m. and requested the Agency select a Presiding Officer in the absence of Chair Hunter and Vice Chair Millhouse. CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Agency to appoint Agency Member Mikos to act as Presiding Officer in the absence of Chair Hunter and Vice Chair Millhouse. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Agency Members Mikos, Parvin, and Van Dam. Absent: Vice Chair Millhouse and Chair Hunter. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, Executive Director; Joseph Montes, General Counsel; Mary Lindley, Parks, Recreation and Community Services Director; Barry Hogan, Community Development Director; Yugal Lail, City Engineer /Public Works Director; David Klotzel, Assistant City Engineer; David Bobardt, Planning Manager; David Moe, Redevelopment Manager; Captain Jeff Matson, Sheriffs Department; Ray Young, Building Official; Deborah Traffenstedt, Agency Secretary; and Maureen Benson, Deputy City Clerk. AT THIS POINT in the meeting, a recess was declared to depart for the tour. The time was 5:11 p.m. The special meeting reconvened at 5:15 p.m. for a tour of 192 High Street, the train station fagade, and adjacent buildings. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. 000021 Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency Moorpark, California Page 2 February 7, 2007 4. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Agency to conduct Items 4.A. and 4.B. concurrently. A. Tour of Agency Owned Properties at 192 High Street, the Train Station Facade and Adoacent Buildings. B. Consider Authorizina Staff to Beain the Process of Razina Two Buildinas and Four Silos Located at 192 High Street. Staff Recommendation: Authorize staff to secure and repair Building No. 3, and begin the CEQA process for the review of impact relating to the demolition of Building No. 1, Building No. 2 and four silos. Mr. Hogan and Mr. Lall conducted a tour of the perimeter of Buildings 1, 2, 3, and the silos located at 192 High Street. Mr. Hogan, Mr. Lall, and Mr. Young pointed out the potential failure and lack of structural value of the silos; and exposed siding, compressed bottom plates and structural instability of Buildings 1 and 2; along with termite damage to supports. In response to Agency Member Van Dam, Mr. Hogan explained the process of an Initial Study, which would determine the impacts of demolishing Buildings 1 and 2 and which environmental document should be prepared. He stated the proposal should be complete in a month and would be brought back to the Agency for consideration. Mr. Kueny stated these buildings will be "red- tagged" and the fences repaired. In response to Agency Member Mikos, Captain Matson stated once the property is red - tagged, law enforcement can take action to keep people out of the buildings; and the people found in the buildings are given information in both English and Spanish regarding social service agencies that may assist them. In response to Agency Member Mikos, Ms. Traffenstedt stated there were no speakers. MOTION: Agency Member Parvin moved and Agency Member Van Dam seconded a motion to authorize staff to secure and repair Building No. 3, and begin the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process for the review of impacts relating to the demolition of Building No. 1, Building No. 2 and the four silos. The motion carried by voice vote 3 -0, Vice Chair Millhouse and Chair Hunter absent. 000022 Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency Moorpark, California Paae 3 February 7 2007 5. ADJOURNMENT: Agency Member Mikos moved and Agency Member Van Dam seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion carried by voice vote 3 -0, Vice Chair Millhouse and Chair Hunter absent. The time was 5:32 p.m. Patrick Hunter, Chair ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt Agency Secretary 0 00023 11-1031 S.C. lE'e" . LAO, 0A0071 7,� MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 17-h. d4n-ra�.. AGENDA REPORT TO: Honorable Board of Directors FROM: Johnny Ea, Finance Director Prepared by: Debbie Sanquis , Accountant I DATE: February 15, 2007 (Agency meeting of March 7, 2007) SUBJECT: CONSIDER RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MID -YEAR AMENDMENTS TO 2006/2007 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET BACKGROUND The Board of Directors adopted a budget for fiscal year 2006/2007 on June 21, 2006, and has amended it several times for various projects and programs. After a review of the current budget status, in anticipation of developing a budget recommendation for the new fiscal year, staff has compiled additional recommended budget amendments for the Board's consideration. DISCUSSION The attached resolution makes several revenue and expenditure adjustments to the currently adopted 2006/2007 fiscal year budget, with an explanation for each item contained in Exhibit "B ". Revenue adjustments are either increases due to unanticipated revenue or receipts higher than budgeted, including a $1 million settlement payment from Mission Bell for notes 3 and 6, the sale of 2006 bond proceeds in the amount of $8.9 million and capitalized interest in the amount of $1.9 million for the 2006 bond. Expense adjustments are all either omissions, or critical items that were not previously included in the budget such as the purchase of an additional piece of property ($500,000 additional request) for MRA Housing. These increases will be covered by additional projected revenues or available reserves. Exhibit "A" summarizes the projected changes to revenues and expenditures and the net fiscal impact by fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Roll Call Vote Required) 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2007- amending the fiscal year 2006/2007 budget as noted in Exhibits "A & B" to the attached resolution. UO000.0 RESOLUTION NO. 2007- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2006/2007 ADOPTED OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET WHEREAS, on June 21, 2006, the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency adopted the Operating and Capital Improvements Budget for fiscal year 2006/2007; and WHEREAS, certain additions and adjustments to the budget are proposed to allow for effective service delivery for the balance of the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency now wishes to amend the 2006/2007 fiscal year budget as noted in Exhibits "A & B ". NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. A budget amendment in the aggregate increase in expenditures of $625,934 from the Low /Mod Housing Fund; and a budget amendment in the aggregate increase in revenues of $964,066 from the MRA Operations Fund, $8,923,500 from the MRA Tax Allocation Bond Fund, and $1,969,357 from the MRA Debt Service Fund, as more particularly described in Exhibits "A & B" attached hereto is hereby approved. SECTION 2. The Agency Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 2007. Patrick Hunter, Chair 000025 ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Agency Secretary Attachment: Exhibits A and B — Mid Year Budget Amendment 0000AZ 6 Exhibit "A" MOORPARK REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Mid Year Budget Amendment for the 200612007 Fiscal Year Summary by Fund C C) C ra Projected Projected Net Fund Revenue Expenditure Impact Increase Increase Increase Fund (Decrease) (Decrease) (Decrease) 2901 - Low/Mod Housing $ 1,166 $ 627,100 $ (625,934) 2902 - MRA Operation 1,034,266 70.200 964,066 2905 - MRA TA Bonds 8,923,500 - 8,923,500 3900- MRA Debt Service 1,969,357 - 1,969,357 S 11,928,289 S 697 300 $ 11,230,989 C C) C ra Exhibit "B" Moorpark Redevelopment Agency Mid Year Budget Amendment for the 2006/2007 Fiscal Year Object Current Current Amended Budget Unit Code Fund /Division Description Budget Actual Revision Budget Explanation REVENUE: 2901 3741 Redevelopment Agency Other Loan Payoff $ - $ 1,166 $ 1,166 $ 1,166 Rehab loan payment 2902 3741 Redevelopment Agency Other Loan Payoff 82,271 1.032,537 950,266 1.032,537 Mission Bell notes 3 & 6 settlement payment 2902- 2410 -5030 3401 Redevelopment Agency Rents & Concessions - 7,076 14,000 14,000 High Street Arts Center concessions 2902 - 2410 -5030 3410 Redevelopment Agency Ticket Sales 37,337 70,000 70,000 High Street Arts Center tickets 2905 3711 2006 Tax Allocation Bond Sale of Bonds - 8,923,500 8,923,500 8,923,500 Sale of 2006 bond proceeds 3900 3021 Debt Service Tax Increment Unsecured 818,000 846.846 28,846 846,846 Higher property taxes 3900 3712 Debt Service Other Long Term Proceeds - 1,940 511 1,940,511 1,940,511 Capitalized interest for 2006 Tax Allocation Bonds (Second Supplemental to 1999 bonds) Net total revenue $ 11,928,289 EXPENDITURES: 2901- 2420 -0000 9202 MRA - Housing Office Supplies $ - $ 283 $ 500 $ 500 Additional office supplies 2901 - 2420 -0000 9224 MRA - Housing Mileage 200 176 100 300 Additional mileage 2901- 2420 -0000 9234 MRA - Housing Advertising 200 869 1,000 1.200 Additional advertising 2901 - 2420 -2011 9103 MRA - Housing Special Professional Services - 3,500 3,500 3,500 Planning staff time spent processing Colmer affordable units 2901 - 2420 -5025 9102 MRA - Housing Contractual Services 26,500 - 14 000 40,500 Cabrillo contract & realtor /consultant costs for first time homebuyer program 2901- 2420 -5032 9285 MRA - Housing Relocation Assistance 5,000 2,150 8,000 13,000 Relocation expenses 2901- 2420 -5032 9612 MRA - Housing Building Acquisition 1,207.000 451,492 500,000 1,707,000 Additional Property acquisition 2901- 2420 -5034 9621 MRA - Housing Building Improvements - - 100.000 100,000 Housing rehabilitation program 2902- 2410 -0000 9103 Redevelopment Agency Special Professional Svcs 133,503 147,055 40,500 174.003 81 First Street construction 2902- 2410 -0000 9201 Redevelopment Agency Comp Supp /Non- Capital 40 257 400 440 Additional computer supplies 2902 - 2410 -0000 9202 Redevelopment Agency Office Supplies 500 487 300 800 Additional office supplies 2902 - 2410 -0000 9232 Redevelopment Agency Printing 1,500 3.187 2,000 3,500 Additional printing costs 2902- 2410 -0000 9252 Redevelopment Agency Property Maintenance 18,000 15,187 3 000 21,000 Additional property maintenance costs 2902 - 2410 -5030 9211 Redevelopment Agency Equipment Rental 1.250 1,945 1.500 2,750 High Street Arts Center operation 2902 - 8310 -8040 9285 Redevelopment Agency Relocation Assistance - 22,500 22.500 22,500 Relocation assistance for the Moorpark Ave widening project Net total expenditures $ 697,300 C C C cr