Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 2003 0305 CC REGMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark. California March 5, 2003 A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on March 5, 2003, in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 6:55 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Scott Mosher, Executive Director of the Boys and Girls Club of Moorpark, led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Harper, Mikos, Millhouse, Parvin, and Mayor Hunter. Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager; Ken Gilbert, Public Works Director; Mary Lindley, Community Services Director; Barry Hogan, Community Development Director; Cynthia Borchard, Administrative Services Director; Walter Brown, City Engineer; Captain Richard Diaz, Sheriff's Department; Nancy Burns, Senior Management Analyst; Julie C. T. Hernandez, Senior Management Analyst; Paul Porter, Principal Planner; Deborah Traffenstedt, Assistant to City Manager /City Clerk; and Maureen Benson, Deputy City Clerk. 4. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS: A. Certificate of Appreciation from the United Way of Ventura County. Mayor Hunter announced that David Smith, President and CEO of the United Way of Ventura County, was unable to attend the meeting to present a Certificate of Appreciation recognizing the generosity of city employees for their donations to the United Way campaign. He indicated that the presentation would be rescheduled. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 March 5, 2003 5. PUBLIC COMMENT: Gerald Goldstein, a Moorpark resident, spoke about unrecorded crimes creating "safe city" statistics. AT THIS POINT in the meeting, the City Council recessed to convene a meeting of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency. The time was 7:00 p.m. The City Council meeting reconvened at 7:05 p.m. 6. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: (Pursuant to Council Rules of Procedure Section 2.8, Items to be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar shall be identified at this time.) None. 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: Councilmember Mikos congratulated Kohl's Department store in Moorpark on their successful opening. Councilmember Mikos congratulated the Moorpark High School Academic Decathlon Team and wished them luck at the State Championship event. Councilmember Parvin congratulated Captain Diaz and the Moorpark Police Department for Moorpark's outstanding safety rating as noted in the Los Angeles Times newspaper article. 8. PUBLIC HEARING: A. Consider Proposals for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds for Fiscal Year 2003/2004. (Continued from February 5, 2003, with public hearing closed.) Staff Recommendation: Authorize the allocations recommended by the Budget and Finance Committee and staff from FY 2003/2004 CDBG funds, as described in the agenda report, with the provision that these amounts be prorated if the total funding allocated to Moorpark is higher or lower than $197,623. Councilmember Mikos disclosed to the Mayor, fellow Councilmembers, and the public that per Government Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 3 March 5, 2003 Code, Section 1091, she is publicly disclosing that she is a member of the Board of Directors of the Commission on Human Concerns, serving as one of the statutorily required public members and representing the 4th Supervisorial District, as appointed by Supervisor Judy Mikels. The Commission on Human Concerns, one of the applicants for CDBG funding for this item, is a 501(c) (3) non - profit corporation, and is Ventura County's officially designated Community Action Agency serving the poor and less fortunate across Ventura County since 1965 with the following mission: "Helping people through advocacy and services which promote dignity and self - sufficiency." As a Board Member for the Commission, per Government Code Section 1091, she is said to have a "remote interest" and therefore is allowed to, and will fully participate in all discussions and deliberations for this item under the "remote interest" exemption relative to potential contracts for non - profits. She stated she may even vote on the item, but her vote cannot be counted toward any decision about a potential contract for the Commission on Human Concerns. She went on to state that she may vote, and have her vote count, on potential contracts for any of the other applicants. Ms. Burns gave the staff report. Mayor Hunter stated that this is a public hearing item the Council previously considered and referred to the Budget and Finance Committee. In response to Council questions, Mr. Kueny stated that in regard to the Long -Term Care Ombudsman Program, the next item on the agenda is recommending $1000 be applied to their request for $2,000. He went on to state that staff is recommending any additional Public Service monies that become available be designated by the City Council for that project. MOTION: Councilmember Parvin moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to authorize the allocations recommended by the Budget and Finance Committee and staff from FY 2003/2004 CDBG funds, as described in the agenda report, with the provision that these amounts be prorated if the total funding allocated to Moorpark is higher or lower than $197,623, and to further designate to the Long- Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 4 March 5, 2003 Term Care Ombudsman Program, any additional Public Service monies identified. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. B. Consider Re- allocation of Unspent Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds from Prior Years FY 1998/1999, FY 1999/2000, FY 2000/2001, FY 2001/2002, and FY 2002/2003. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open a public hearing on reallocation of funds from prior years, accept public testimony, and close the public hearing; 2) Authorize the re- allocation of unspent funds from previous years, as shown in the agenda report, to the Spring Road Project; and 3) Re- allocate $1,000, previously allocated to the Senior Survivalmobile (FY 2001/2002) to the Long -Term Care Ombudsman Program, providing this is consistent with HUD guidelines. Ms. Burns gave the staff report. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny stated that the estimated amount available from the Public Service monies, which was designated in the previous item for the Long -Term Care Ombudsman Program, is in the range of $500.00. In response to Councilmember Harper, Ms. Burns stated that the dollars allocated for the Senior Survivalmobile were not spent, as there was no longer a demand for the service when the funds became available. Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. Councilmember Mikos stated that she highly supports the recommendation for funds to be set aside for what could be called the new Human Services Center. Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to: 1) Authorize the reallocation of unspent funds from previous years, as shown in the agenda report, to the Spring Road Project; and 2) Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paqe 5 March 5, 2003 Reallocate $1,000, previously allocated to the Senior Survivalmobile (FY 2001/2002) to the Long -Term Care Ombudsman Program, providing this is consistent with HUD guidelines. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. C. Consider Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -04 for Construction of a 72,285 Square Foot Commercial Center and Tentative Parcel Map No. 5264 for Subdivision of 6.28 Acres into Four Lots Located at the Southwest Corner of Campus Park Drive and Collins Drive on the Application of M &M Development. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public testimony and close the public hearing; 2) Adopt the proposed Negative Declaration as sufficient environmental documentation; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2003- approving Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 2000 -04 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 5264. Mr. Hogan gave the staff report, outlined three issues, and asked the Council to consider modification to conditions dealing with the Traffic Systems Management Fee (TSM) and the Citywide Traffic Fee. In response to questions from Council, Mr. Hogan stated that: the Traffic Study included in the information provided to the Council was presented by the applicant as additional information; the Art in Public Places requirement does apply to this project and is defined in the project conditions; the nature of the on -site art would not be determined until the project is approved by Council; the applicant is proposing a cut in the median on Campus Park Drive for east bound traffic, while staff is proposing the on- site driveway at Campus Park Drive have three lanes providing a dedicated lane for left turns through the median; landscaping would be reduced by this extra lane, but the project exceeds landscaped area requirements; the Planning Commission conditioned the project to increase the size of trees along Campus Park Drive to replace trees lost due to median modification; delivery trucks would access the site through the front of the center during off - hours; the two chain link gates being replaced by block wall are not required by the fire department; staff and other agencies are not concerned with underground leakage Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paae 6 March 5, 2003 from the gasoline tanks; maintenance of the landscape median will be paid for by the shopping center owner; and the periodic review of the gas station operating 24 -hours a day allows staff require a reduction in operating hours if there are problems. A discussion followed between the Council and staff regarding safety concerns associated with the driveway on Collins Drive, including: eliminating the driveway as the safest possibility; stipulating a right -turn only into the center as the second safest possibility; moving the driveway further south; similarities to ingress /egress at other local gasoline stations; and staff's determination that if the driveway is to remain, it is located in the optimum location. In response to Council questions, Mr. Hogan stated that the project is conditioned to require the applicant to provide a detailed Traffic Study on the phasing, signalization, and striping of the intersection at Campus Park Drive, which could become an alternate route if the driveway at Collins Drive is eliminated. He further stated that a deceleration lane would not be effective due to insufficient distance between the corner at Collins Drive, south of Campus Park Drive, and the driveway. In response to Councilmember Parvin, Captain Diaz stated that safety concerns for the entire center are neither enhanced nor degraded by having the gas station open for 24- hours. In response to Councilmember Parvin, Mr. Brown stated that staff is concerned about the driveway on Collins Drive, which places too many conflict points too near a corner. Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing. David Morehead, representing M &M Development, 66 Alviso Drive, Camarillo, California, spoke about changes made to the proposal after working with the residents of Campus Hills, staff, the Planning Commission Ad Hoc Committee, and the Planning Commission over a two -year period. He went on to request the following changes to staff's recommendations: retention of the Collins Drive exit, Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paae 7 March 5, 2003 as critical to the tenants; hours of operation, with the exception of the gas station, to close at 10:00 p.m. and allow the fast food to remain open until 12:00 a.m. to accommodate college activities, which end after 10:00 p.m.; and a provision to revisit the TSM fee amount. Brian Dougherty, potential operator of the service station, 302 Wood Ranch Parkway, Simi Valley, stated that a survey of the residents adjacent to the project revealed that they preferred a gasoline station, fast food and a grocery store in this location. He went on to outline the benefits of the project to include: increased tax revenue stream for the city, the potential for 100 -plus jobs, dine -in and take -out food, gasoline, an upscale coffee shop, a car wash, and all located in a beautiful retail center. In response to questions from Council, Mr. Dougherty stated that: the car wash is a drive - yourself version with automatic dryers and two islands for vacuuming; the survey they conducted asking residents what they would like to see developed on the site included one - third of the residents in the area, and did not imply that the gas station was already approved; limiting the outdoor speakers at the fast food should not impact business; employees on duty at the 24 -hour gas station will enhance safety for the entire center; the gas station could not operate without the egress /ingress on Collins Drive; and the residents in the area will still need to buy gas even if the college entrance is relocated. In response to questions from Council, Mr. Morehead stated that: numerous tenants are interested in the fast food location; he cannot name tenants or sign leases until fees are established; Trader Joe's declined this location; the demographics do not support a supermarket; and two small grocery stores have expressed an interest. Bob Ghericke, architect for M &M Development, 4437 Forestglen Court, Moorpark, stated he was available for questions. David Rush, leasing agent for M &M Development, 830 Pleasant Dale Place, Thousand Oaks, stated that: he Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 8 March 5, 2003 was unable to mention specific tenants for the project; this convenience center will be successful and will acquire its business from the college and the surrounding community; it is anticipated that there will be a constant change in the tenant mix; and even with competition from additional centers, this center will still be viable, as the resident numbers will be increasing; and that the second story will house offices for medical, dental, legal, accounting, and insurance services. The following Moorpark residents spoke in favor of the project, citing: increased tax revenues for the city; convenience for purchasing gasoline and fast food; the applicant has addressed residents' concerns; the residents need consideration for this use even if the college entrance does change; and the architecture is attractive Paul Bedigian Stephen Bohnert Cheri Risley Bonnert Robert Brunner Jeff Burg Flo Carvalho Rosalie Gehres Daniel Groff James McDonald Sandy Miller Lina Santelli Jim Stueck, Chamber of Commerce Board Member, 484 E. Los Angeles Avenue, Suite 116, Moorpark, spoke in support of the project. Jeff Gery, a Moorpark resident, stated that: the Traffic Study does not give an accurate picture of peak conditions; he is concerned with high traffic volume activity at the corner intersection of the site; the driveway on Collins Drive should be eliminated; this is possibly not an appropriate use for this intersection; he does not want to see large signage; and he suggested reversing the location of the gas station on the site. The following Moorpark residents spoke in opposition to the project, citing: questionable polling Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paae 9 March 5, 2003 techniques; impact on traffic; safety issues associated with egress /ingress to the gas station; health concerns from having a gasoline station in close proximity to residential areas and a park; lighting pollution; and security issues at a 24 -hour gas station operation. Patrick Ellis Michael Greywitt Susan Nardi Steve Nardi Dr. Helga Winkler Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were 133 Written Statement cards submitted in favor of the project as proposed; and 9 Written Statement cards, some expressing opposition, some neutral, and some unspecific, citing concerns regarding: increased traffic; noise, lights, and odor pollution; health risks from fumes; phased construction; liquor sales; large commercial signs; a request for a pedestrian bridge; changing the zoning from commercial to residential; insufficient landscape buffer; and a request for a fountain. AT THIS POINT in the meeting, the Council meeting was recessed. The time was 9:37. The Council meeting reconvened at 10:08 p.m. Mr. Morehead pointed out that there were 133 Written Statement cards in support of the project, which represents 94- percent of the cards received; and that liquor sales are not part of the proposal. Councilmember Harper complimented the applicant on his presentation and stated that: the architecture is well done; he likes the center better than the dirt lot; he has major concerns about some of the uses including the fast food and gas station not being compatible with adjacent residential use; the ingress /egress on Collins Drive is a disaster; the applicant and staff should look at another configuration for ingress /egress other than Collins Drive; increased traffic and noise will be generated by the gas station use; if the project is approved, hours of operation should be limited; the gas station should be reoriented on the site; a study of the impacts and means of mitigating emissions from the Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 10 March 5, 2003 fast food operation should be performed; and he is in favor of the use of art and would concur with a fountain and the use of stamped concrete. Councilmember Parvin stated that: she was a participant in the survey, which did not appear to be biased; the applicant has set a precedent for letting the community know what they are planning; and she likes the convenience, beautiful architecture, attractive site, creation of more jobs, and proposed landscaping. She went on to state that more work on the Collins Drive entryway is needed without harming the circulation plan. Councilmember Millhouse stated that: the applicant was not required to survey the residents; the applicant has responded to their concerns; alcohol sales were never an issue of this proposal; an overwhelming number of residents want this project; the Planning Commission has addressed a number of issues; the Council should not try to redesign the project; the architecture of the main building is great; the gas station is needed and convenient; the landscaping at the corner should be further articulated; this will be a key visual point for the city; an alternate method should be employed in the evenings rather that having outdoor speakers for restaurants; the project is not increasing traffic, just redirecting it; he thinks the driveway on Collins Drive is a benefit; he concurs with Councilmember Harper's suggestions for art on site; and he realizes this project must come back before the Council. Councilmember Mikos stated she agrees that the architecture is beautiful, but she is concerned about the traffic and the gas station. She went on to state that: she is concerned about sacrificing safety for convenience; nothing has convinced her that it is safe with this circulation plan; there appear to be flaws in the Traffic Study prepared by the applicant's engineer; she is not in favor of a gas station, however, if it is approved, it should be reoriented to have a different driveway; and she is not prepared to vote at this time, the project needs to come back. Mayor Hunter stated that the Council has summarized the concerns. He asked staff to analyze traffic Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paae 11 March 5, 2003 circulation inside and outside the project to provide the Council with all the alternatives for locating or eliminating the driveway. Mr. Hogan stated that a Traffic Study would take time to be analyzed and that the Permit Streamlining Act time limit would need to be waived by the applicant to allow time for staff to prepare the required information. In response to Councilmember Millhouse, Mr. Kueny stated that: it would be possible for staff to bring this item back to the Council by the first meeting in April, as they may be able to use the Traffic Study prepared for the North Park project; the real issue is not one of traffic, but of circulation and access; the options are available to be repackaged and presented to Council; and it would be best if there was a longer time extension, pertaining to the Permit Streamlining Act, to avoid asking for any additional extension. He asked the Council for a straw vote on whether staff should explore reversing the gas station on the site; and for exploring the addition of onsite public art. CONSENSUS: It was the consensus of the Council that staff should explore reversing the location of the gas station on the site and to explore the addition of onsite public art. Mr. Morehead stated that he was shocked to learn that a continuance is necessary. He asked the Council to consider approval of the project, at this time, without the driveway on Collins Drive and allow a Traffic Study to be performed with alternatives to the access to be presented as a separate issue. Mayor Hunter stated he preferred to consider the project as a whole. Councilmember Harper concurred with Mayor Hunter and stated that: the Council does not want to delay the project; there are significant issues to consider and staff needs time to look at them in their entirety; the applicant should know the Council is comfortable with the architecture; and the range of issues is limited, so a consensus should be reached quickly. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 12 March 5, 2003 Mr. Morehead stated that without the gas station component the expensive architecture would not be possible. In response to Councilmember Mikos, Mr. Kueny stated that he recommends that the applicant sign a waiver to consent to a time extension to May 9, 2003, to prevent the need to request another extension if Council does not approve the project at the April 2, 2003, meeting. Mr. Moreland agreed, on the record, to an extension of the Permit Streamlining Act time limit to May 9, 2003. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Mikos seconded a motion to continue the open public hearing to April 2, 2003. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 9. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION: A. Consider an Ordinance Amending Section 3.16.050 of Chapter 3.16 of the Moorpark Municipal Code Changing the Reporting Requirements of the City Treasurer to the City Council. Staff Recommendation: Introduce Ordinance No. 293 for first reading and waive full reading of the ordinance. Ms. Borchard gave the staff report. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. Ms. Traffenstedt read the title of Ordinance No. 293. MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 293. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. MOTION: Councilmember Mikos moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to introduce Ordinance No. 293 for first reading. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Consider Resolution Amending the FY 2002/2003 Budget, Approve Plans and Specifications, and Authorize Advertisement for Receipt of Bids for the Flinn Realianment Protect (Protect 8037). Staff Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 13 March 5, 2003 Recommendation: 1) Adopt Resolution 2003 -2055, 2) Approve the plans and specifications for the subject project; and 3) Authorize staff to advertise for receipt of bids for construction of the project. Mr. Gilbert gave the staff report. In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Kueny stated that renaming one of the two streets will be referred to the Transportation/ Streets Committee, which will be meeting in April. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to: 1) Adopt Resolution 2003- 2055, 2) Approve the plans and specifications for the subject project; and 3) Authorize staff to advertise for receipt of bids for construction of the project. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. C. Consider Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Advertise for Receipt of Bids for the 2003 Slurry Seal Project. Staff Recommendation: Approve the plans and specifications for the subject project and authorize staff to advertise for receipt of bids for construction of the project. Mr. Gilbert gave the staff report. In response to Councilmember Parvin, Mr. Gilbert stated that despite the quality of previous work, the city cannot deny bids if the contractor has a license; the Council has directed that no cars be towed from streets to be slurry sealed, creating the need to seal around the parked cars and return later to patch those areas; and improved inspection techniques allow the city to assure a better quality slurry seal. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to approve the plans and specifications for the subject project and authorize staff Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 14 March 5, 2003 to advertise for receipt of bids for construction of the project. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. D. Consider Resolution Amending the FY 2002/2003 Budget, Approve Plans and Specifications, and Authorize Advertisement for Receipt of Bids for the Asphalt Overlay 2003 Project (Project 8011). Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 2003 -2056, approve the plans and specifications for the subject project, approve the addition to the scope of work AC pavement remedial work on Tierra Rejada Road, and authorize staff to advertise for receipt of bids for construction. Mr. Gilbert gave the staff report. In response to Council questions, Mr. Gilbert stated that although a complete overlay is aesthetically more pleasing, a more reasonable price is achieved by deferring a complete overlay for several years and by using different techniques on problem areas of pavement; typically, overlays take place after 20- years, if they can be funded; and there is a 3 -year moratorium policy in effect to prevent utility companies from digging up newly surfaced streets. Mr. Brown stated that utility companies that insist on digging, must patch and slurry seal a good distance to restore the waterproof integrity of the streets. In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Traffenstedt stated that there were no speakers. MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Parvin seconded a motion to adopt Resolution 2003 -2056, approve the plans and specifications for the subject project, approve the addition to the scope of work for the pavement remedial work on Tierra Rejada Road, and authorize staff to advertise for receipt of bids for construction. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. 10. CONSENT CALENDAR: MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 15 March 5, 2003 A. Consider Approval of Warrant Register for Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 - March 5, 2003. Manual Warrants Voided Warrant Payroll Liability Warrants Regular Warrants 111972 - 111974 111424 111975 - 111982 $ 23,858.09 $ (2,962.40) $ 12,375.50 111983 - 112091 & $ 64,774.03 112092 - 112132 $1,263,809.14 Staff Recommendation: Approve the warrant register. B. Consider Mid -Year Amendments to 2002/2003 Fiscal Year Budget. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 2003- 2057 amending the FY 2002/2003 budget. C. Initiate Proceedings Related to the Levy of Assessments for the Park Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2003/2004. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 2003 -2058 authorizing preparation of an Engineer's Report for the Moorpark Park Maintenance and Improvement Assessment District for FY 2003/04. D. Consider Reauest from Moorpark Kiwanis to Waive Park Rental Fees for Softball Tournament. Staff Recommendation: Approve the request from Kiwanis of Moorpark to waive park rental fees associated with their Girls Softball Tournament, provided that they pay all direct costs incurred by the City, including one staff person dedicated to the Tournament. E. Consider Approval of Plans and Specifications for the Procurement and Installation of Transit Bus Shelters. Staff Recommendation: Approve the plans and specifications for the procurement and installation of transit bus shelters, and authorize staff to proceed with the bid process for this project. F. Consider Leaving One Teen Council Position Vacant Until the Next Regularly Scheduled Recruitment. Staff Recommendation: Concur that the vacant teen council position will not be filled due to the length of the remaining term of office. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 16 March 5, 2003 11. ORDINANCES: A. Consider Ordinance No. 291, an Ordinance of the City of Moorpark, California, Amending Chapter 6.04 General Provisions, Chapter 6.08 Animal Control, Chapter 6.12 Impoundment, and Chapter 6.16 Licensing of Cats and Dogs, of Title 6, Animals, to Allow Designated City Staff to Enforce Title 6. Staff Recommendation: Declare Ordinance No. 291 read for the second time and adopted as read. Ms. Traffenstedt read the title of Ordinance 291. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Millhouse seconded a motion to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 291. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Millhouse seconded the motion to declare Ordinance No. 291 read for a second time and adopted as read. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 12. CLOSED SESSION: None was held. 13. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION: Councilmember Millhouse moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to adjourn. The motion c�aie by unanimous voice vote. The time was 11:06 p.m. n 11 ATTEST: S, l Deborah S. Traffenst City Clerk