HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1983 0803 CC REGMoorpark, California
August 3, 1983
Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark,
California, was held on August 3, 1983, in the Council Chambers
in the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue,
Moorpark.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m., Mayor Yancy- Sutton
presiding.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Beaulieu.
3. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Roger Beaulieu, Clinton D. Harper,
Albert Prieto, Jerry Straughan, and Mayor Leta
Yancy- Sutton;
ABSENT: None.
OTHER CITY OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES PRESENT: Niall Fritz, City
Manager /Director of Community Development; Mark C. Allen, Jr.,
City Attorney, and Scott Field, Attorney at Law, both of the
law firm of Burke, Williams and Sorenson, and Doris D. Bankus,
Acting City Clerk.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Bill Mitchell, 6440 N. Berkeley Circle, Moorpark, spoke in
opposition to the proposed increase in the capacity of the
Simi Valley Dump; also opposed to provisions of Ordinance No. 4
of the City.
Tom Baldwin, 6475 Pepperdine, Moorpark, gave results of a personal
survey which he had conducted with result that average citizens
were in favor of protection of hills and also in favor of school
site in the Campus Park area before any more development is
permitted.
5. BUSINESS ITEMS
5.A Presentation by United Wa
John W. Newton, 538 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, addressed Council
regarding United Way Campaign and distributed statistical
information regarding services performed by United Way member
organizations in Moorpark in 1982; also urged oarticioation by
citizenry. r
an
It was moved by Councilmember
member Prieto and unanimously
resolution, which was read in
WHEREAS, Moorpark has
tenth City by virtue
July 1, 1983; and
Beaulieu, seconded by Council -
carried to adopt the following
full by the City Attorney:
become Ventura County's
of its incoruoration on
WHEREAS, United Way of Ventura County recognizes
Moorpark's new independence as evidence of its
community spirit; and
WHEREAS, United Way of Ventura County feels that
it should embark on a new concept of fundraising
in smaller communities; and
WHEREAS, Moorpark received human care services and
benefits to more than 4,988 residents from 29
United Way Funded agencies in 1982; and
WHEREAS, Moorpark volunteers have committed to
coordinate the 1984 United Way Campaign for the
City, in an educational manner, with a target of
raising "our fair share" of contributions for the
important and essential work of United Way in
Moorpark;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Moorpark
City Council hereby declares the month of August,
1983, as UNITED WAY FUNDRAISING MONTH IN MOORPARK.
urging all citizens, businesses and industry
involved in our City to give their "fair share"
for 1984, when called upon by United Way volunteers.
5.B Extension of Contract with Acting Citv Clerk
It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Council -
member Harper that the contract with Doris D. Bankus as Acting
City Clerk be extended to include the month of August, 1983,
with instructions to the City Manager to hire clerical assistance
as soon as possible to relieve Mrs. Bankus of clerical duties.
Motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Harper, Beaulieu,
Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
5.0 Approval of Warrants
It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Council -
member Beaulieu that demands totaling $1,673.04, as approved by
the City Manager, be approved, and that warrants be drawn for
each of the following, to wit:
-2-
DEMAND NO. CLAIMANT AMOUNT
6 Advanced Rubber Stamp Co. $ 24.84
7 Moorpark News 10.00
8 Doris D. Bankus 15.90
9 Niall Fritz 2.30
10 Doris D. Bankus 1,620.00
TOTAL
$ 1,673.04
Motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Beaulieu, Harper,
Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
S.C. Appointment of City Treasurer (Non- Agenda Item)
Mayor Yancy- Sutton stated that at the time of incorporation,
Robert Baxter has been appointed as City Treasurer, to serve
on an interim basis pending appointment of a City Treasurer
to serve on a permanent basis. She then recommended that
John C. Gedney, who is a Certified Public Accountant, be appointed
as City Treasurer, and it was then moved by Councilmember Straughan,
seconded by Councilmember Prieto and unanimously carried to appoint
John C. Gedney as City Treasurer, to serve at a compensation of
$50.00 per month.
By general consent, the Mayor was authorized to write a letter
of appreciation to Mr. Baxter for his services.
S.D. Approval of Warrant Signature Policy
It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Council -
member Beaulieu that the following resolution be adopted:
RESOLVED, that any one of the following persons acting
jointly with Niall Fritz:
Leta Yancy- Sutton
Albert Prieto
John C. Gedney
are hereby authorized to withdraw funds of this corpora-
tion from its account at Bank of A.Levy, to sign checks
and drafts against said account for and on behalf of this
corporation and to endorse and deposit in said account
checks, certificates of deposit and drafts payable to this
corporation; that the bank is hereby authorized to honor
any and all such instruments to signed including those
drawn to the individual order of any person authorized by
this resolution to sign the same; that this corporation
-3-
shall be liable to the bank and shall reimburse it
immediately for the amount of any overdraft; that
all previous authorizations heretofore given are hereby
revoked, such revocation, however, not to affect the
validity of any check or other instrument heretofore
signed or endorsed by any person or persons at the time
authorized to act; that this account shall be governed
by the conditions, rules and regulations of the bank
covering commercial accounts, receipt of a copy of which
is hereby acknowledged, and by the rules, regulations
and by -laws of the bank, now existing, hereafter adopted
or as hereafter amended.
Motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Beaulieu, Harper,
Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
Mayor Yancy- Sutton announced that Mr. Gedney was unable to be
present at this meeting, but that she had conferred with him and
he had agreed to accept the appointment.
6. PUBLIC WORKS MATTERS
6.A. Acceptance of Subdivision Improvements
6.A.1. Tract No. 3032 -2 - Los Anaeles Avenue near Mira Sol Drive
The City Manager presented communication dated July 25, 1983
from the County Public Works Agency, containing an overview of
the subject matter and after discussion, it was moved by
Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Councilmember Beaulieu
that the public improvements within Tract No. 3032 -2 be accepted
by the City, and the streets within said tract be included in the
City street system for maintenance pursuant to Section 1806 of the
Streets and Highways Code, which motion carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Beaulieu, Harper,
Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
6.A.2. Tract No. 3492 - Between Campus Park and Virginia
Colonv Areas
The City Manager presented communication dated July 26, 1983
from the County Public Works Agency, containing an overview of
the subject matter, and after discussion it was moved by
Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Councilmember Prieto
that the public improvements within Tract No. 3492 be accepted
by the City and the streets within said tract be included in
the City street system for maintenance.
-4-
Councilmember Beaulieu raised the question of the maintenance
of the streets and landscaping in the tract prior to completion
of the buildings to be built, it being an industrial park and
subject to heavy truck traffic during construction.
The City Manager pointed out that this matter was considered at
the time of approval of the Tentative Tract Map. and it was
conditioned accordingly.
On roll call the motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Prieto and
Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: Councilmembers Beaulieu and Harper;
ABSENT: None.
EXECUTIVE SESSION (Non- Agenda Item)
At this time the Council adjourned to an Executive Session, the
time being 7:42 p.m.
The meeting convened at 8:20 p.m., all members of the Council
being present.
7. PLANNING MATTERS
7.A. Ordinance No. 4 Status Report
The City Manager presented his report dated July 29, 1983, out-
lining the status of the review being conducted by the Planning
Commission and the City Council under the provisions of Ordinance
No. 4, which was adopted by the City Council at the meeting of
July 6, 1983. It was moved by Councilmember Beaulieu, seconded
by Councilmember Harper and unanimously carried that said report
be approved and ordered received and filed.
7.B. Public Hearing: Extension of Ordinance No. 4
The City Attorney explained the provisions of Ordinance No. 4,
in particular the urgency provision contained therein, and stated
that the purpose of the public hearing is to comply with the
provisions of the Government Code of the State of California in
order to extend Ordinance No. 4 beyond the 45 day period provided
by State law.
The City Clerk presented Affidavit of Posting of Notice of this
public hearing in the three public place within the City, i.e.,
Moorpark City Hall, Moorpark Post Office and Moorpark College.
She also presented the following communications:
-5-
(1) From Robert Kamerik, 14604 Hartford Street,
Moorpark, dated July 14, 1983, in support of
Ordinance No. 4;
(2) From Varsity Park Homeowners Association, Varsity
Park Patio Homes Homeowners Association, and Varsity
Park Villas Homeowners Association, Moorpark, dated
July 21, 1933, concerning statements made at the
Council Meeting of July 20, 1983; and
(3) From Mrs. Clifford Volke, 11744 Buttercreek Road
and Mrs. Joyce E. Bowers, 4733 Avedon Road, both
of Moorpark, dated July 28, 1983, concerning
problems in the Heatherwood Development and discussing
future development in the City.
By general consent all of the above documents were ordered
received and filed.
The Mayor declared the hearing opened and the following persons
addressed the Council:
Louise Rice Lawson, Building Industries Association,
601 Daily Drive, Camarillo, in opposition to
extension of Ordinance No. 4;
David W. Tredway, 500 Esplanade Drive, Oxnard,
representing Pacifica Corporation, in opposition
to extension of Ordinance No. 4;
Phil Vein, U. S. Condominium Corporation, 6568 Princeton
Avenue, Moorpark, in opposition to extension;
Joan Korpal, 15017 Marquette, Moorpark, in opposition
to extension;
Ron Baumsteiger, 15008 -C Campus Park Drive, Moorpark,
in opposition to extension.
There being no further testimony to be heard regarding the subject
matter, the hearing was closed by unanimous consent.
On instructions by the Council, the City Attorney presented
Ordinance No. 5, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA,
EXTENDING THE PERIOD FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS APPROVED BY THE
COUNTY OF VENTURA PRIOR TO JULY 2, 1983.
It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Council -
member Straughan that further reading of said Ordinance No. 5
be waived, which motion was carried by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Straughan. Beaulieu,
Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
aMe
It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Council -
member Harper that said Ordinance No. 5, entitled as above set
forth, be adopted, which motion was carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Harper, Beaulieu
and Prieto;
NOES: Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
ABSENT: None.
7.C. Public Hearinqs:
7.C.1. Residential Planned Development No. 918 - Urban West
The City Attorney announced that the public hearing on this
matter had been closed at the meeting of July 20, 1983 and that
pursuant to instructions he had prepared a resolution of approval
of the subject project with the addition of a condition for solar
stubouts as recommended by the City Manager. Upon instructions
of the City Council, the City Attorney then presented Resolution
No. 83 -20, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOP-
MENT PERMIT 918 (URBAN WEST)
It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Council -
member Harper that further reading of said resolution be waived,
and that said Resolution No. 83 -20 be adopted, which motion was
carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Harper, Prieto
and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: Councilmember Beaulieu;
ABSENT: None.
7.C.2. Residential Planned Development No. 969 - Urban West
The City Attorney announced that the public hearing on this
matter had been closed at the meeting of July 20, 1983 and that
pursuant to instructions he had prepared a resolution of approval
of the subject project with the addition of a condition for solar
stubouts as recommended by the City Manager. Upon instructions
of the City Council, the City Attorney then presented Resolution
No. 83 -21, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOP-
MENT PERMIT 969 (URBAN WEST)
-7-
It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Council -
member Harper that further reading of said resolution be waived,
and that said Resolution No. 83 -21 be adopted, which motion was
carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Harper, Prieto
and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: Councilmember Beaulieu;
ABSENT: None.
7.C.3. Residential Planned Development No. 970 - Urban West
The City Attorney announced that the public hearing on this
matter had been closed at the meeting of July 20, 1983 and that
pursuant to instructions he had prepared a resolution of approval
of the subject project with the addition of a condition for solar
stubouts as recommended by the City Manager. Upon instructions
of the City Council, the City Attorney then presented Resolution
No. 83 -22, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOP -
ment permit 970 (URBAN WEST)
It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Council -
member Harper that further reading of said resolution be waived,
and that said Resolution No. 83 -22 be adopted, which motion was
carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Harper, Prieto
and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: Councilmember Beaulieu;
ABSENT: None.
7.C.4. Residential Planned Development No. 965 - Mormon Church
The City Manager displayed a landscaping plan of the proposed
project and recommended approval.
By general consent Mr. Gary M. Bronson, 4451 N. Halifax Road.
E1 Monte, California, of Cornwall Associates, Architects,
addressed the Council on behalf of the applicant, and urged
approval.
There being no further testimony to be heard, the hearing was
declared closed by unanimous consent.
The City Attorney then presented and read Resolution No. 83 -23,
entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOP-
MENT PERMIT 965 (MORMON CHURCH)
It was moved by Councilmember Beaulieu and seconded by Council -
member Harper that said Resolution No. 83 -23 be adopted, which
motion was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Beaulieu, Harper, Prieto,
Straughan and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
7.C.5. Residential Planned Development No. 963 - Griffin Homes
Councilmember Straughan stated that he would not participate in
the subject matter because of a possible conflict, and he left
the Council bench.
The City Manager gave an update report on the subject matter and
there was discussion regarding the conditions recommended by the
City Manager.
By general consent the public hearing was reopened and the
following persons addressed Council supporting the application:
Rick Niec, of Griffin Homes, 19436 Ventura Boulevard;
Bob Perrault, 6413 E. Westwood, Moorpark
Gerry Goldstein, 11932 Los Angeles Avenue, Moorpark.
There being no further testimony to be heard, the hearing was
declared closed by unanimous consent.
Upon instructions from the City Council, the City Attorney then
presented Resolution No. 83 -24, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 963 (GRIFFIN HOMES)
It was moved by Councilmember Beaulieu and seconded by Council -
member Harper that further reading of said resolution be waived,
and that said Resolution No. 83 -24 be adopted, which motion was
carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Beaulieu, Harper, Prieto
and Mayor Yancy - Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None;
ABSTAIN: Councilmember Straughan.
It was moved by Councilmember Harper, seconded by Councilmember
Beaulieu and unanimously carried that the City Manager be
directed to prepare a letter for the Mayor's signature, addressed
to the County Property Administration Agency and urging that
the parksite be turned over to the City as soon as possible.
Councilmember Straughan then returned to his chair at the Council
bench.
7.C.6. Residential Planned Development No. 903 - Griffin Homes
By general consent the hearing on Residential Planned Develop-
ment No. 903 was continued to the Council Meeting of August 17,
1983.
RECESS
The Mayor declared a recess, the time being 9:20 p.m.
The meeting was reconvened at 9:30 p.m., all members of the City
Council being present.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
The City Attorney stated that he should have reported publicly
when Council reconvened from the executive session earlier in this
meeting, and that with permission from the Council he would do so
at this time. He then proceeded to announce that the purpose
of the executive session was to discuss potential litigation.
7.C.7. Residential Planned Development No. 940 - U.S.Condominium
The City Manager gave a report on the status of the negotiations
with the developer, stating that agreement had been reached on
the addition of three conditions.
By general consent the hearing was re- opened and Mr. Phil Vein,
representing U. S. Condominium, the developer, addressed Council
in support of the the recommendations of the City Manager and
urged approval of the project.
Councilmember Beaulieu stated that he was concerned about the
need for and designation of a school site in the area.
By general consent the matter was continued until later in the
meeting.
7.D. Status Report on Residential Planned Development No. 857 -
U. S. Condominium
The City Manager gave his status report on the subject develop-
ment, reading the conditions which had been agreed to by Mr.
Phil Vein, representing the developer, and stating that there
are three outstanding problems: (1) a school site; (2) possible
redesign of Phases III, IV and V to further minimize hillside
development; and (3) development of landscape median in Campus
Park Drive and Princeton. He stated that he would have a full
report on further negotiations at the hearing on August 17, 1983.
7.C.7. Residential Planned Development No. 940 - U.S.Condominium
(Continued from earlier)
Upon instructions from the Council, the City Attorney presented
and read in full Resolution No. 83 -25, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 940 (U. S. CONDOMINIUM)
He stated that Mr. Vein had been furnished a copy of the pro-
posed resolution and had indicated that he approved of its
contents.
It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by
Councilmember Prieto that said Resolution No. 83 -25 be adopted.
Councilmembers Harper and Beaulieu both expressed concern
about the lack of a designated school site in either RPD -940
or RPD -963.
Councilmember Straughan then stated that he had not been aware
that RPD -963 would be discussed along with RPD -940, stating
further that he would have to abstain from participation because
of the possibility of a conflict of interest, and he withdrew
his motion, with the consent of the second.
It was then moved by Councilmember Prieto and seconded by
Councilmember Beaulieu that Resolution No. 83 -25, entitled as
above set forth, be adopted. In seconded the motion to adopt
the resolution of approval, Councilmember Beaulieu stated that
he was of the opinion that Mr.Vein had made a good faith effort
to locate an acceptible school site in RPD -940, and was willing
to support approval of this planned development with the
belief that Mr. Vein will continue to pursue the location of
school site.
Councilmember Harper stated that he would continue to oppose
further development until a school site has been designated,
and he called for the question, with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Prieto, Beaulieu, and
Mayor Yancy - Sutton;
NOES: Councilmember Harper;
ABSENT: None;
ABSTAIN: Councilmember Straughan.
7.E. Hillside Grading Ordinance
The City Manager gave an overview of the matter of the adoption
of a hillside grading ordinance, presenting his written report
dated August 1, 1983, to which was attached a communication dated
August 2, 1983 from John C. Crowley, of the County Public Works
Agency, outlining the basic differences between the proposed
ordinance and the present County grading ordinance. Also attached
to the City Manager's letter was a communication dated July 21.
1982 from Louise Rice - Lawson, Executive Director of the Building
Industry Association of Southern California, Inc., urging that
careful study be made of the needs of Moorpark before adopting
-11-
the proposed ordinance, and extending an offer to work with
the City staff in the drafting of such an ordinance.
The following persons addressed Council concerning the subject
matter:
Louise Rice - Lawson, Executive Director of Building
Industry Association of Southern California, in
support of letter dated July 21, 1983;
David W. Tredway, 500 Esplanade Drive, Oxnard, California,
representing Pacifica Corporation, supporting the idea
of a study committee to evaluate the needs of Moorpark
Phil Vein, U. S. Condominium, supported the suggestion re
formation of a committee.
After discussion it was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded
by Councilmember Straughan that the City Manager be directed to
study the possibility of adopting the existing Ventura County
grading ordinance and the proposed hillside development ordinance
for an interim period, and report back to the City Council at the
meeting of August 17 with a suggestion as to the membership of
a committee to design a permanent ordinance.
The City Manager requested that the motion be amended to require
his report to be brought back to the Council as soon as possible
rather than for the meeting of the 17th, because of his workload.
Councilmember Harper amended his motion accordingly, with the con-
sent of Councilmember Straughan, and the amended motion was then
carried unanimously.
RECESS
Mayor Yancy- Sutton declared a recess, the time being 10:50 p.m.
The meeting was reconvened at 11:00 p.m., all members of the
Council being present.
It was then moved by Councilmember Beaulieu and seconded by
Councilmember Harper that the City Manager be directed to file
an appeal with the County on any grading permits issued by the
County which would be in violation of the proposed ordinance,
so that those grading permits could be heard before the City
Council.
The City Attorney advised that since it is not certain that there
exists an appeal process in the County ordinance, the City Manager
be directed to determine the process, if such exists, by which
those permitswhich are most questionable could be subject to
review.
Councilmember Beaulieu then withdrew his motion with the consent
of the second, and moved that the City Manager be directed to
-12-
evaluate the County grading permit process and to determine
if there is a method by which the City Council could review
permits, and if there is such a process, to implement such
procedure for those permits which might be in violation of the
proposed ordinance under study by this Council. Said motion
was seconded by Councilmember Harper and carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Beaulieu, Harper, Straughan
and Prieto;
NOES: Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
ABSENT: None.
7.G. Adoption of Planning Permit Fee Schedule
The City Manager outlined his report dated July 29, 1983,
regarding recommendation of the County Planning Division for
adoption of processing fees for land development permits,
and recommended adoption of resolution establishing such fees.
The following persons spoke regarding the subject matter:
Louise Rice - Lawson, Executive Director of Building
Industry Association, urging a two -week continuance
in order to provide opportunity for study and input;
Phil Vein, U. S. Condominium, supporting continuance
and further study.
The Mayor also read a note which had been left by John Newton,
538 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, urging consideration of 50%
reduction in fees for a concurrent zone change in commercial
and industrial, the same as is provided for residential.
It was moved by Councilmember Straughan, seconded by Councilmember
Prieto and unanimously carried to continue the matter to the
regular meeting of August 17, 1983.
8. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND OTHER ITEMS OF BUSINESS
None.
9. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council at
this time, the meeting was adjourned the time being 11:30 p.m.
Approved: DORIS D. BANKUS, X-61-ling City Clerk
�Yyor
-13-