Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1983 1005 CC REGMoorpark, California October 5, 1983 Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California was held on October 5, 1983, in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p. m. , Mayor Leta Yancy- Sutton presiding. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Prieto. 3. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmembers Harper, Prieto, Straughan and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu (excused) (arrived at 11 :05 p.m.) OTHER CITY OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES PRESENT: Niall Fritz, City Manager /Director of Community Development; Mark C. Allen, Jr., City Attorney; Doris D. Bankus, City Clerk; Sgt. Jim Sli *ter, Sheriff's Department; Richard L. Wilson, Fire Division Chief. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS None Mayor Yancy- Sutton announced the birth of James William Fritz, son of Mr. and Mrs. Niall Fritz, and offered congratulations personal=ly, as well as on behalf of the entire City Council. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the City Council Meeting of July 19, 1983, were approved as recorded, by unanimous consent. 6. PRESENTATIONS The Mayor proclaimed the week of October 9 through 15, 1983, as "NATIONAL FIRE PREVENTION WEEK ", announcing that Richard L. Wilson, Fire Division Chief of the County of Ventura Fire Protection District,. was present to accept the proclamation. -1- 7. PLANNING MATTERS 7. A. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7. A. 1. Residential Planned Development PD -857 (U. S. Condominium) - pursuant to Ordinance No. 4 Councilmember Prieto announced that he would abstain from participating in the discussion and action on this matter, because of a possible conflict of interest. The City Manager suggested that the Council might wish to hold this matter until the arrival of Councilmember Beaulieu, who was expected to arrive later in the meeting; however, it was decided by general consent to proceed with the order of the agenda. The City Manager stated that negotiations had been conducted with the developer, Mr. Phil Vein, and that Mr. Vein was ready to make a presentation to the Council to explain the results of such negotiations. He stated that the negotiated conditions had not been reduced to writing, but that if Council approved them, then the pre- pared resolution could be presented at the next meeting, October 19, 1983. Mr. Phil Vein, 6685 Princeton, Moorpark, representing the applicant, U. S. Condo- minium, addressed Council and explained with illustrations the changes which had been negotiated in the project. He requested favorable consideration by the Council. The Mayor then announced the public hearing to be opened, and the City Clerk presented Affidavit of Posting of Notice of this hearing, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 4 of said City, adopted July 6, 1983. The following persons then spoke in favor of the development (PD -857): Herman Schmid, 6470 N. Amhurst, Moorpark Ed Bodnar, 6830 N. Westwood, Moorpark Michael Fleming, 15050 -D Marquette Street, Moorpark Lynne Hornstein, 15138 -D Campus Park Drive, Moorpark The following persons then spoke in opposition to the development: Dr. Robert Meadows, 11855 Elwin Road, Moorpark Marci Butler, 6425 E. Westwood, Moorpark Mr. Vein gave a brief rebuttal, and there being no further testimony, the Mayor declared the hearing closed. There followed a discussion regarding the conditions which had been negotiated and further possibility of a re- design of the project to further mitigate the con- cerns regarding hillside development, which would be an item of additional expense to the developer. Mr. Vein stated he would agree to astudy to see whether or not it would be feasible to re- design the project. There was some discussion concerning whether or not Campus Park Drive need be a four -lane as opposed to a two -lane road; also some discussion regarding roofing materials to be used in the project. -2- It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember Straughan that the City Manager be instructed to continue to negotiate with the applicant regarding a possible re- design of the project, which motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Harper and Straughan NOES: Mayor Yancy- Sutton ABSTAIN: Councilmember Prieto ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu Mayor Yancy- Sutton then declared a recess, the time being 8:30 p. m. The meeting reconvened at the hour of 8:45 p. m., all members of the Council being present with the exception of Councilmember Beaulieu, who was on excused absence. In response to concerns expressed by Mayor Yancy- Sutton regarding the continuing deferment of a decision on PD -857, the City Attorney quoted from Ordinance No. 5 of the City of Moorpark, and gave his opinion that under the provisions of the ordinance the City Manager/Director of Community Development is under a con- tinuing duty to study the Residential Planned Developments affected by said ordinance and to report back to the City Council; therefore, the directive given in the previous motion is an administrative act and not a legislative act, and is in order. 7. A. 2. Adoption of General Plan a. Land Use Element b. Circulation Element and Amendments By general consent this matter was continued to the regular meeting of October 19, 1983. 7. A. 3. Resolution Denying Appeal No. 148 re PD -851 (Pacifica /Pardee) (continued from 9- 21 -83) 7. A. 4. Resolution Approving Appeal No. 149 re PD -851 (Pacifica /Pardee) (continued from 9- 21 -83) 7. A. 5. Resolution Approving PD -851 (Pacifica /Pardee) continued from 9- 21 -83) The City Manager stated that the plans (elevations) for the project are a part of the case file in the Planning Department for checking, but had not yet received them back; however, he stated he had been informed by telephone call from the County Planning Department that the set of plans he had furnished were identical to the plans approved by the County in 1980, and that no other plans had been approved subsequently by the County. The City Attorney advised that the Council should have the approved plans before them when any formal action regarding the plans is taken. During discussion between membenof the City Council and the City Staff„ the City Attorney, upon inquiry, stated that it would be appropriate to condition the subject permit to provide that specific floor plans be located on specific lots within the project, or that the plot plans be subject to the approval of the City Manager. Mr. Fritz advised Council that there is presently a condition on the permit that provides that the final plot plan shall be approved by the Planning Director. -3- The Mayor then announced the public hearing to be opened and the following persons spoke in favor of PD -851: David W. Tredway, 500 Esplanade Drive, Oxnard, California representing the applicant, Pacifica Corporation Dennis LaMonte, 500 Esplanade Drive, Oxnard, California representing the applicant, Pacifica Corporation Leonard Frank, representing Pardee.Qorporation, applicant. The following persons spoke in opposition to PD -851: Stephen Anderson, 13820 Bear Valley Road, Moorpark, California, representing Marlborough Moorpark Homeowners Wally Todd, 4240 Tecolote Court, Moorpark, California, representing Countryside Homeowners Board There being no further testimony to be heard at this time, the Mayor declared the hearing to be closed. The City Attorney then presented Resolution No. 83 -41, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DENYING APPEAL #148 FILED BY PACIFICA CORPORATION IN RE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOP- MENT PERMIT NO. PD -851. It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Councilmember -- Harper that further reading of said Resolution No. 83 -41 be waived, and that said resolution be adopted, which motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Harper, Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES: None; ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu. The City Attorney then presented Resolution No. 83 -42, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK APPROVING APPEAL #149 FILED BY CITY COUNCIL -ELECT OF MOORPARK, IN RE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD -851. It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Councilmember Harper that further reading of said Resolution No. 83 -42 be waived, and that said resolution be adopted, which motion carried by the following roll call vote:: AYES: Councilmember Straughan, Harper, Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES: None; ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu. The City Attorney then presented a resolution approving Residential Planned Development Permit PD- 851(Pacifica and Pardee), but there was no motion for adoption. -4- It was moved by Councilmember Straughan that the matter be continued to the next regular meeting of the City Council, or until such time as the applicant has submitted to and received approval by the City Manager of a plot plan of the project indicating thereon the lot designations for the elevations and floor plans previously approved by the County. Said motion died for lack of a second. There was discussion regarding whether or not the Pacifica Corporation Develop- ment plans could be approved on a different time schedule from those of Pardee Corporation, who is owner of a portion of the real property to be developed. The City Attorney advised this could be accomplished if the developers could not coordinate their development schedules. The City Manager suggested that the matter be continued to the next regular Council meeting in order to give him an opportunity to modify the proposed reso- lution of approval to provide that the County - imposed condition on the permit requiring approval of the plot plan by the Planning Director be modified to require the approval of the City Council at the time of development. Mr. Tredway, speaking for Pacifica Corporation, stated that the question of what to put on a plot plan cannot be rushed because of various marketing events and suggested that further delay would severly prejudice his client. Councilmember Harper than questioned the City Attorney whether or not the permit could be conditioned to provide that no more than 25% of the units in the project be of one size, and that no more than 3 contiguous lots be of one size, to which inquiry the City Attorney replied in the affirmative. It was moved by Councilmember Harper :and seconded by Councilmember Straughan that the matter be continued to the next regular meeting and that the City Manager be directed to modify the proposed approval resolution to provide the following: a That no more than 2570 of the units on the lots be of any one size; b That no more than 3 contiguous lots be of any one size; and c That the City Manager approve the exact form of the notice to be given to the prospective buyer of any lot within 50 feet of the Simi Santa Rosa Fault. Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Straughan, Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES: None; ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu. Mayor Yancy - Suttom declared a recess,, the time being 9:40 p. m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:50 p. m., with all members present with the exception of Councilmember Beaulieu, who was on excused absence. 8. BUSINESS ITEMS 8. A. Mobile Home Rent Control Review Board It was moved by Councilmember Straughan, seconded by Councilmember Harper and unanimously carried that the following appointments to the Mobile Home Rent -5- Control Review Board be approved: Barton Miller Jan Weaver Joseph Scordamaglia Mary Horton - Wozniak Walter "Wally" Todd 8. B. Ordinance No. 8, Fire Facilities Fee The City Attorney presented Ordinance No. 8, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK REGARDING THE IMPOSITION OF BUILDING FEES TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES. It was moved by Councilmember Harper, seconded by Councilmember Straughan and unanimously carried that further reading of said ordinance be waived. It was moved by Councilmember Prieto and seconded by Councilmember Harper that said Ordinance No. 8, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK REGARDING THE IMPOSITION OF BUILDING FEES TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES. be adopted, which motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Prieto, Harper, Straughan and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES: None; ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu. 8. C. Ordinance No. 9, Police Facilities Fee The City Attorney presented Ordinance No. 9, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK REGARDING THE IMPOSITION OF BUILDING PERMIT FEES TO PROVIDE POLICE FACILITIES It was moved by Councilmember Prieto, seconded by Councilmember Straughan and unanimously carried that further reading of said ordinance be waived. It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Councilmember Harper that said Ordinance No. 9, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK REGARDING THE IMPOSITION OF BUILDING PERMIT FEES TO PROVIDE POLICE FACILITIES be adopted, which motion carried by the following roll call vote: mom AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Harper, Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES: None; ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu. 8. D. Ordinance No. 10, Councilmembers Compensation The City Attorney presented Ordinance No. 10, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK FIXING THE COMPENSATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL It was moved by Councilmember Harper, seconded by Councilmember Straughan and unanimously carried that further reading of said ordinance be waived. It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember Straughan that said Ordinance No. 10, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK FIXING THE COMPENSATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL be adopted, which motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Straughan, Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES: None; ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu. 8. E. Ordinance No. 11, Elections Consolidation The City Attorney presented Ordinance No. 11, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DEFERRING ITS GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO THE DATE OF THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION It was moved by Councilmember Straughan, seconded by Councilmember Harper and unanimously carried that further reading of said ordinance be waived. It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember Straughan that said Ordinance No. 11 be introduced, which motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Straughan, Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES: None; ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu. 8. F. Resolution Initiating Proceedings, etc. , for Formation of Maintenance District AD -83 -1, Tierra Rejada Road and other Streets. Mayor Yancy- Sutton announced that since two members of the Council were unable to participate in this item of the agenda because of possible conflict of interest, and with the absence of Councilmember Beaulieu, it would be her suggestion that this item be continued until the arrival of Councilmember Beaulieu, whose presence would constitute a quorum. -7- This being agreeable with the applicant, and there being no objections, it was so ordered. 8. G. Status Report on Hillside Develo2ment Ordinance The City Manager reported that he had solicited a tentative proposal for working with an engineering firm with expertise in the area of hillside development and municipal ordinances, and would report back when information had been received. Report approved unanimously. 8. H. Construction of City Offices The City Manager recommended the formation of a Facilities Construction Committee to be responsible to the City Council for directing and overseeing all phases of the design and construction of City offices, said committee to be made up of three individuals: Councilman Al Prieto, a representative of the County, and either another member of the City Council or a community member familiar with construction. He stated that Phil Vein had agreed to serve on the committee as a community representative. There being no objections, the report was approved. 8.1. Deletion of High Street as a State Highway. The City Manager reported that he had met with a representative of Caltrans concerning the redesignation of State Route 118 through Moorpark to delete High Street and Moorpark Avenue and replace them with Moorpark Road and Los Angeles Avenue, and had been informed that a letter from the Mayor of Moor- park to the Director of District 7 of Caltrans would be appropriate to make the request formally of Caltrans. It was moved by Councilmember Harper, seconded by Councilmember Straughan and unanimously carried to approve the report and authorize the Mayor to sign the letter to Caltrans. 8. J. Approval of Warrants It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember Prieto that demands totaling $3, 449. 14, as approved by the City Manager, be approved and that warrants be drawn for each of the following, to wit: DEMAND NO. MADE BY AMOUNT 42 U. S. Postmaster (stamps) 134.00 43 Professionally Speaking 30.00 44 Tri- County Dictating Systems 53.74 45 California Journal 35.00 46 Moorpark News 109.20 47 The Enterprise 78.02 48 So. Calif. Association of Gov'ts 186.00 49 Eastman, Inc. 628.03 50 Mary Jo Rasey 296.43 51 Niall Fritz 1,180.97 52 Doris D. Bankus 675.25 53 Niall Fritz 42.50 TOTAL $3,449.14 Said motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Prieto, Sgraughan and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES • None; ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu. 9. DISCUSSION ITEMS There was discussion as to whether or not the items under this portion of the agenda in which Councilmember Beaulieu had expressed specific interest should be held over until he could be in attendance; by general agreement the order of the agenda was followed; 9. A. Proposed Ordinances Restricting Building in Geologic Fault Zones. It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember Straughan that the City Manager be instructed to proceed with his recommended review and analysis of the proposed ordinances and to report back. Councilmember Harper then amended his motion to provide that in the event an affected development is in process, the review and analysis be expedited so that the ordinances are adopted before the project is built, which amendment was seconded by Councilmember Straughan and unanimously carried. The main motion was then carried by unanimous vote. Councilmember Prieto then expressed some concern about some provisions of the proposed ordinances, and agreed to work with the City Manager during the study. 7. A. 5. PD -851 (Pacifica /Pardee) Mayor Yancy- Sutton then interrupted the order of the agenda to state that she had been handed a note advising her that the applicant (Pacifica) could have the elevation plans, available within 45 minutes for presentation to the Council at this meeting if Council would agree to re -open the hearing. By general consent the Council agreed not to re -open the hearing at this time. 9. B. "Granny Flats" By general consent the report of the City Manager dated October 5, 1983, regarding the subject matter was ordered received and filed, pending receipt of further information. 9. C. Ordinance Restricting the Parking of Campers and Vehicles being Repaired. Frank Knickelbein, 4893 Avedon Road, Moorpark, addressed Council suggesting that careful consideration be given to the drafting of subject ordinance, especially in the definition of camper, van, bus, and other vehicles. Councilmember Harper stated that Agoura Hills had either adopted or was con- sidering the adoption of an ordinance to restrict the parking of oversized vehicles overnight on residential streets, and suggested that a copy of such ordinance be obtained and distributed to the members of the Council for study. The City Attorney and the City Manager both cautioned that any ordinance adopted by the City Council should first be submitted to the Sheriff's Department for review and comment regarding enforcement and fines. By general consent the matter was continued for further study. 9. D. Roofing Materials It was moved by Councilmember Straughan that any type of wood shake, as well as any composition of asphalt, asbestos, fiberglass, etc., roofing materials be prohibited within the City, with the exception of tile roofing. Councilmember Harper stated he would support a motion to prohibit shake of any type, as well as composition shingle roofs, and there followed a discussion regarding different types of roofing materials. The following individuals addressed the Council regarding the subject matter: Jim Hartley, 5950 Gabbert Road, Moorpark, urged that Council give thorough consideration to different types of composition roofing materials, some of which are not objectionable to the Fire Protection District or to insurance companies; asked that the matter be studied thoroughly before a decision is reached. Phil Vein, of U. S. Condominium, Moorpark, expressed concern that action might be taken on this matter without further study and information; stated that he felt there should be some flexibility, that the City should not prohibit all roofing materials except tile, and that maintenance of tile roofs would impose an additional burden on the homeowner, and would increase the initial cost of the home con- siderably. Louise Rice - Lawson, of Building Industries Association, expressed concern over the rapidity of action on this item and requested a delay in order to study the matter more thoroughly; offered to bring to Council a display of different kinds of acceptable composition roofing materials. By general consent the Council requested the Building Industries Association to develop the suggested display of composition roofing materials, together with a report on the comparative costs involved. Councilmember Straughan then withdrew his motion, with the consent of the second, and Ms. Rice - Lawson agreed to bring the display and report to the next regular meeting of the Council. It was then moved by Councilman Harper and seconded by Councilmember Straughan that the City Manager and the Planning Commission be directed to not approve any new structures that contain any type of wooden shake roofing. Mayor Yancy- Sutton stated that she felt the action was redundant in that the County had already adopted an ordinance prohibiting the use of wooden shake roofing. It was clarified that the County ordinance prohibited untreated wooden shake roofing; also that the Fire Protection District had a policy of prohibiting all wooden shake roofing in the District. -10- The motion passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Straughan and Prieto; NOES: Mayor Yancy - Sutton; ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu. 9. E. Use of Aluminium Electrical Wiring Councilmember Harper requested that this matter be continued to permit him an opportunity to locate a study which had been published by Consumers Reports in which it was recommended that no aluminium wiring be use in structures, and he stated he would like to furnish a copy to each of the Councilmembers. The matter was continued by general consent. 9. F. Animal Regulation Mayor Yancy- Sutton requested that this matter be continued for further study, especially in matters of enforcement, and it was suggested that perhaps the City could contract in the future with the Humane Society, or with the County if the Humane Society has no place to harbor the stray animals, such a contract to be specific to meet the City's needs. During the above discussion, at 10:50 p. m., Councilmember Straughan left the Council bench and returned at 10 :53 p. m. 10. G. Assembly Bill 1597 (Costa) By general consent it was agreed that the City Manager would summarize the effects of the subject legislation at a future meeting. Non - Agenda Item: Noise Ordinance The City Attorney announced that pursuant to instructions from the City Council, the City Clerk had procured from the League of California Cities copies of various city ordinances regulating noise. He suggested that the City Clerk hold them in her possession, and that members of the Council review them at her office and indicate any ordinances which they might be interested in having copied for reference. Non - Agenda Item: The City Attorney announced that the matter of approval of franchises may be ready for placement on the agenda for the next meeting of the Council; that because of a possible conflict of interest, he must disqualify himself from par- ticipating in the matter and that in his stead, Kathy Stone, Assistant City Attorney, of the firm of Burke, Williams and Sorensen, would be in attendance at the Council meeting. At this time, 11 :05 p. m., Councilmember Beaulieu arrived in the Council Chambers, and Mayor Yancy- Sutton declared a short recess in order to provide an opportunity to brief Councilmember Beaulieu on the status of Item S. F. , which had been continued pending his arrival. The meeting reconvened at 11 :20 p. m. , with all members of the Council being present. -11- 8. F. Resolution Initiating Proceedings, etc. , for Formation of Maintenance District AD -83 -1, Tierra Rejada Road and other streets. Mayor Yancy- Sutton and Councilmember Straughan both announced a possible conflict of interest which would prohibit them from participating in this pro- ceedings, and the Mayor handed the gavel to Mayor Pro Tempore Prieto, who then presided over the meeting. Pursuant to the provisions of the petition dated August 26, 1983, filed with the City by Griffin Development Company and referred by the Council to the City Attorney at its regular meeting of September 7, 1983, the City Attorney presented for consideration Resolution No. 83 -43, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE FORMATION OF THE " MOORPARK LANDSCAPE MAIN- TENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 83 -1 ", AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO BE ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO THE "LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 ". It was moved by Councilmember Harper, seconded by Councilmember Beaulieu and unanimously carried to waive further reading of said resolution. It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember Beaulieu that said Resolution No. 83 -43, entitled as above, be adopted, which motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Beaulieu and Mayor Pro Tempore Prieto; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: Councilmember Straughan and Mayor Yancy- Sutton. Mr. Rick Niec, representing the applicant, Griffin Homes, 19436 Ventura Boulevard, Tarzana, California, then filed with the City Clerk the Engineer's Report, as required by said Resolution No. 83 -43, which Engineer's Report was entitled, "Master Plan. & Design Development Report, Lighting & Landscape District #83 -1, City of Moorpark, CA. " Mr. Tom Powell, of Hollwarth, Powell, Stein & Hinman, 4000 MacArthur Boule- vard, Suite 6000, Newport Beach, attorney for the applicant, Griffin Homes, addressed Council briefly, and upon questioning by the City Attorney, affirmed that the Engineer's Report had been prepared by a licensed landscape architect. It was then moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember Beaulieu that further reading of Resolution No. 83 -44, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 22586 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, DECLARING ITS INTEN- TION TO ORDER THE FORMATION OF THE "CITY OF MOORPARK LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD -83 -1" IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 22587 OF SAID CODE, AND ORDERING THE FORMATION OF SAID DISTRICT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 22594 OF SAID CODE. -12- be waived, and that said Resolution No. 83 -44 be adopted, which motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Beaulieu and Mayor Pro Tempore Prieto; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: Councilmember Straughan and Mayor Yancy- Sutton. Mayor Pro Tempore turned the gavel back to Mayor Yancy- Sutton, who then presided over the meeting. 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Harper stated that he had a few items he wished placed on the agenda for future Council consideration, as follows: 1. Look into the possibility of dividing the Pacifica /Pardee Planned Development, inasmuch as there are now two owners; concurred in by Councilmember Straughan. 2. Regulating the discharging of firearms within the City; perhaps request that the Sheriff's Department make a presentation at a Council meeting on existing ordinances in the County, and also any enforcement problems. 3. Wether or not Council Agenda packets should be assembled in a file or a notebook, with the majority of the Councilmembers preferring the file. There being no further business to come before the Council, it was moved by Councilmember Harper, seconded by Councilmember Straughan and unanimously carried to adjourn, the time being 11 :55 p. m. APPROVED: Respectfully submitted, Doris D. Bankus City Clerk -.13-