Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1983 1019 CC REGMoorpark, California October 19, 1983 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California, was held on October 19, 1983, in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m., Mayor Leta Yancy- Sutton presiding. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember .Harper 3. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmembers Beaulieu, Harper Prieto, Straughan and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; ABSENT: None. OTHER CITY OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES Manager /Director of Communit y Assistant City Attorney, and both from the firm of Burke, Doris D. Bankus, City Clerk; Department. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS PRESENT: Niall Fritz, City Development; Katherine Stone, Scott Field, Attorney at Law, Williams and Sorensen; and Lt. Arve Wells, County Sheriff's The following persons addressed Council strongly opposing regulation of parking of recreational vehicles: Phil Mason, of 437 Shasta, Moorpark Bill Mason, of 437 Shasta, Moorpark Bill Campbell, of 341 Susan Avenue, Moorpark Alfred C. Dowd, 445 Millard Street, Moorpark Mary Hayward, 12241 Broadway, Moorpark, representing the Moorpark News; stated they were under the impression the matter of regulation of parking of recreational vehicles would be on the agenda for this meeting, and had so stated in a news story; that the paper was published prior to the preparation of the agenda for this meeting, hence there was no opportunity to correct the news story. Moved by Councilmember Straughan, seconded by Councilmember Beaulieu and unanimously carried that because of the public interest in the subject matter, when the item is placed on the agenda for consider- ation, a notice to that effect will be published in the Moorpark News. -1- 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES By general consent the matter of the approval of the minutes of the regular council meeting of October 5, 1983, was continued to the next meeting of the Council in order to give the City Clerk an opportunity to check on certain matters contained in Item 7.A.5, on page 5 of the minutes. 6. PRESENTATIONS Councilman Bill Esty, City of Camarillo, representing the Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency, gave a quarterly progress report regarding current matters of concern, particularly salt water intrusion and water availability; also explained the assess- ment to be levied against each member City of the district. 10. A. PLANNING MATTERS, Resolution No. 53 -48 Extending certain Land Use Entitlements Councilmember Straughan requested that Item No. 10. A. be considered out of sequence at this time. At the request of Councilmember Straughan, Mayor Yancy- Sutton requested the City Clerk to poll the Council, as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Beaulieu, Prieto and Harper; NOES: Mayor Yancy - Sutton. Moved by Councilmember Straughan, and seconded by Councilmember _ Harper that a resolution be adopted extending all of the items that would normally expire at the end of the 120 -day period, with the possible exception of those items that fall within Ordinance No. 4 that have not been resolved. Under discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Straughan, and seconded by Councilmember Harper that the motion be amended to have Item 10.A. continued and voted on after the public hearings under 7.A. (PD -851) and 7.B. (PD -857). After further discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Councilmember Harper to move Item 10.A. back to its proper sequence on the agenda. Upon advice from the Assistant City A ttorney,:Councilmember Straughan then withdrew his original motion, with the concurrence of the second. It was then moved by Councilmember Straughan, seconded by Council- member Harper and unanimously carried that Item 10.A. be placed back in its proper sequence on the agenda. -2- 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7.A. PD -851 - (Pacifica /Pardee) (continued from 10 -5 -83) The City Manager /Director of Community Development presented his report dated October 19, 1983, to which was attached resolution of approval modified as instructed by the Council at its meeting of October 5, 1983; also attached was alternative language for new condition No. L, pertaining to percentage of mix of models in the project,together with a copy of roposed Agreement to be entered into between Owners (Developers and the City, wherein City is indemnified from liability for any damage arising from land failure within 50 feet of the Simi -Santa Rosa fault. The City Manager also presented Exhibit B consisting of floor and elevation plans for "Suntree" project, for PD -851, prepared by Compton -Flynn Associates, 11850 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 22, Los Angeles 90025, consisting of 39 pages including the title page, as reviewed by the City Council at its meeting of September 7, 1983, and as previously approved by the County of Ventura in 1979. The Mayor declared a recess in order to give the members of the City Council an opportunity to view said plans, the time being 7:45 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:00 p.m., with all members of the Council present. The following persons spoke concerning the subject matter: Stephen Anderson, 13820 Bear Valley Road, Moorpark, representing Peach Hill Citizens Coalition and Marlborough Homeowners Association; requested that applicant speak first, inasmuch as he had been informed some changes were to be proposed. Stan Cohen, 500 Esplanade Drive, Oxnard, representing Pacifica Corporation, applicant; agreed with City Manager's comments concern- ing percentage of model mix in the project, stating his preference for alternative L -1, as suggested by the City Manager; approved Exhibit A (agreement) of the proposed resolution ,sub �ject to a change in the language of Paragraph No. 1 to read: 'Owners shall fully comply with all recommendations and requirements contained in the approval by the County of Ventura relating to the Simi -Santa Rosa fault, and with any other conditions heretofore required by City relating to said fault." Leonard Frank, Pardee Construction, 10639 Santa Monica Boulevard, Los Angeles 90025; stated that he had no objections to the conditions in the proposed resolution, that Pardee has no plans of any kind involving the portion of the tract which it owns, and requesting that the RPD be split and acted on separately; providing suggested language for such a split -- that the Pardee reference be "PD -851 (Tentative Tract 2865, Unit 1,2 & 3 "),and the Pacifica reference be "PD -851 (Tentative Tract 2865, Unit 4,5,6 & 711). -3- There followed some discussion regarding changing the 50 -foot notification requirement and indemnification provision to 250 -feet; also some discussion regarding spliting the permit between Pacifica and Pardee Corporations in accordance with their agreement of sale/ purchase. — Stephen Anderson, 13820 Bear Valley Road, Moorpark, again addressed Council, expressing support of mix of "Suntree" plans with elevations and floor plans of plans labeled "Steeple Hill ", which he had viewed and had been led to believe had been proposed by Pacifica. Further discussion was had concerning the square footage of the different models to be built, the use of tile roofing material, the proposed condition relating to percentage of the smallest unit to be built in the project, and the notification /indemnifi- cation requirement. Councilmember Straughan stated that it was his recollection that previous discussions had specified 250 -foot notification /indemni- fication requirement as pertains to the earthquake fault, however, Mr. Cohen stated that his recollection was that the requirement was as stated in the agreement, 50 feet, and offered to provide certified transcript to clarify the matter. Councilmember Beaulieu expressed concern regarding the earthquake fault and the City's potential liability, and stated his preference for the 250 -foot rather than the. 50 "foot notification /indemnification requirement. After further discussion the hearing was cldsed by unanimous consent. It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Councilmember Beaulieu that PD -851 (Pacifica /Pardee) be approved with the "Suntree" product, with the condition that the smaller unit not occupy in excess of 15% of the units developed; that the rights of the applicant be extended to permit inclusion, at applicant's discretion, of those units on the plans labeled "Steeple Hill ", prepared by Compton - Flynn Associates consisting of 47 pages, including the title page, marked Exhibit C and made a part of the subject file; that no roofing materials other than the (cement or clay) be permitted; and that the permit be separated as to Pacifica Corporation and Pardee Corpor- ation.ownership, according to the proposal submitted verbally by Mr. Frank, of Pardee Corporation. Also included would be the provision that the 50 -foot notification /indemnification requirement, be-changed to a 200 -foot notification /indemnification requirement, specifically referred to in the City's condition No. I and in the Agreement referred to in Condition No. J(Exhibit "A?'). After discussion it was moved by Councilmember Straughan, seconded by Councilmember Beaulieu and 4nanimously carried that said motion be amended to include alternative conditions L -1 and L -2 in place of Condition L, to read as follows: -4- L -1. That it is the intent of this permit to provide for an adequate mix of all approved models and floor plans. Therefore, there shall not be a preponderance of any one model or floor plan. L -2. N_dt withstanding Condition No. 4 of the permit, the final plot plan shall be subject to the approval of the City Council. An increase in square footage of individual floor plans upon individual lots constitutes a minor modification. There was discussion concerning parksite development in the project, and Mr. Cohen assured that all conditions previously imposed by the County would be complied with completely by the two parties -- Pacifica and Pardee -- that the agreement between the parties specifically addresses that fact. Councilmember Harper then requested that the applicant, consisting of representatives of both Pacifica and Pardee, agree to the conditions contained in the motion of approval; also Mr. Stephen Anderson, representing the Peach Hill Citizens Coalition. Mr. Frank, of Pardee, stated that he would agree to whatever conditions were imposed by the County previously, that were agreed to by Pacifica, or which were a part of the agreement of purchase between Pacifica and Pardee, but requested clarification of the matter because some of the conditions contained in the motion of approval did not pertain to.the portion of the property owned by Pardee. Mr. Cohen, on behalf of Pacifica, stated that he would not agree with every one of the conditions; that an evaluation would be made of the conditions imposed and a determination made after that. Mary Redus Gayle, Attorney at Law, of the firm of Oliker & Gayle, representing Pardee, addressed Council, and suggested that the contents of the motion be reversed, that first the Planned Develop- ments be separated as to Pardee and Pacifica, and that then those conditions that apply to Pardee, Units 1,2 and 3 be stated, and then those conditions that apply to Pacifica, Units 4,5,6 and 7, be stated. The Mayor then declared a recess, the time being 9:30 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:50 p.m., with all members of the Council present. By unanimous consent the meeting then adjourned to an Executive Session, the time being 9:51 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 10 :07, with all members of the Council present. -5- The City Attorney, Kathy Stone, stated that the executive session was for the purpose of advising the Council of various options available in light of threatened litigation by Mr. Cohen; that no decision was reached in excutive session; that she had advised the Council that the safest course of action would be to extend the permits pursuant to Item 10 of the Agenda for this Council Meeting, to approve the PD as one unit with the various conditions specified in the motion of approval, but that she had recommended that the permit not be split at this time because there are too many uncertainties about the various improvements contained in the tract map which need to be worked out. It was then moved by Councilmember Straughan, seconded by Council - member Beaulieu and unanimously carried that the main motion be amended to delete that portion pertaining to splitting the permit and that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare as soon as poss- ible whatever documents are necessary to split the permit. There being no further discussion, the resolution of approval, being Resolution No. 83 -50, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PD -851 (PACIFICA AND PARDEE) was adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Beaulieu, Prieto, Harper and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES: None; ABSENT: None. The Mayor declared a recess, the time being 10:10 p.m. The meeting was reoonvened at 10:17 p.m., with all members present. 7.B. Status Report on PD -857 - (U.S. Condominium) Status Report of negotiations was given by the City Manager /Director of Community Development. Phil Vein, of U.S. Condominium addressed Council requesting a decision on the matter, one way or another. He displayed drawings and described in detail the nine new conditions which had been negotiated. Councilmember Prieto announced he would be disqualified from par- ticipating in the subject matter because of a possible conflict of interest. The City Clerk presented Affidavit of Posting of Notice of Public Hearing on the subject PD -857, which Affidavit was ordered received and filed by general consent. The Mayor then declared the hearing to be opened, and the following persons addressed the Council regarding the subject matter: Ed Bodnar, 6830 N. Westwood Street, Moorpark, speaking for himself and also for Mike Fleming, of the Homeowners Association; in favor of project. Marci Butler, 6425 E. Westwood, Moorpark, urging up- grading of building standards in the project. Mr. Vein, in rebuttal, stated that the project is designed for and will be built to above minimum standards. There being no further business, the public hearing was closed by unanimous consent. There was discussion regarding the reduction from 4 -lane to 2 -lane right -of -way on Campus Park Drive past Princeton Avenue, with the City Manager reporting that he had discussed the matter with the County Public Works Agency representatives and had been informed that the 4 -lane condition was imposed before the present General Plan was adopted; that it has now been determined that a 2 -lane road will provide adequate access for the anticipated usage of Happy Camp Park, which is located at the terminus of Campus Park Drive. After discussion it was moved by Councilmember Beaulieu that the City Manager and the City Attorney be directed to prepare a reso- lution of approval with all of the conditions as negotiated with Mr. Vein, for presentation to the City Council at its next regular meeting, November 2, 1983, and to appear on the agenda for consid- eration after the presentation on roofing materials to be made by Building Industries Association representatives. The Mayor called for a second to the motion, and there being none she handed her gavel to Councilmember Harper (who then presided over the meeting) and seconded the motion made by Councilmember Beaulieu. The motion was then carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmember Beaulieu,' Mayor Yancy- Sutton and Councilmember Harper; NOES: Councilmember Straughan; ABSENT: None; ABSTAIN: Councilmember Prieto. Councilmember Harper returned the gavel to the Mayor, who then presided over the meeting. 7.C. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Adoption of General Plan: I. Land Use Element 2. Circulation Element -7- The City Clerk presented Affidavit of Posting and Affidavit of Publication of Notice of Public Hearing in regard to the subject matter, and the affidavits were ordered recieved and filed by general consent. 7.C.1. Land Use Element Ron Vogelbaum, Staff Planner, County of Ventura, presented an overview and history of the Land Use Element of the General Plan. There being no one desiring to give public testimony regarding the matter, it was moved by Councilmen Harper and seconded by Councilmember Straughan that the staff prepare a resolution to certify the environmental impact report of the Moorpark Community Plan and adopt the Moorpark Community Plan, including all amendments, as the Land Use Element of the General Plan for the City of Moorpark; also that the Planning Commission be requested to hold public hearings for refinement of the General Plan, as and when the Director of community Development, in his discretionary judgement, deems it to be ready for review: also requested to review the following General Plan Amendments: "CC&R ", "S&K", "Flory Avenue" and "Charles Street "; requested to review the placement and number of school sites desig- nated on the current General Plan Land Use Element; and also to review the definitions used on the land use categories. Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Straughan, Beaulieu, Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES: None; ABSENTY None. 7.C.2. Circulation Element Ron Vogelbaum, County of Ventura Staff Planner, gave the overview and displayed maps and drawings of the Circulation Element. Discussion was held concerning the Highway 118/23 connector, and the City Manager stated that in a conference with Supervisor Dougherty, he had been assured by the Supervisor that he will continue to work very hard with tht City of Moorpark to make certain this improvement is to be the No. 1 priority for Caltrans. He stressed that the alignments delineated on the maps are merely corridors and are not precise alignments. The Mayor declared the public hearing to be opened and the following persons addressed the Council: Bill La Perch, 7200 Walnut Canyon Road, Moorpark; concerned with extension of Moorpark Road; requested further study. Jerry Goldstein, 11932 Los Angeles Avenue, Moorpark; suggested bridle trails, bike paths and walking paths be added to the plan. There being no further testimony, the hearing was declared closed. me After considerable discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember Straughan that the staff draft a resolution to adopt the Circulation Element and certificate of approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, subject to the following: 1. That the dotted red line be deleted showing the extension of Moorpark Road and the staff place on the map two points where the extension has been deleted, with a statement in the text and also on the map that a study will be conducted in the future to assess the needs of the re- alignment, and also if the need is found, that the exact alignment will be studied; 2. that a similar provision be included for the Highway 118/23 connector; 3. that the Collins Avenue southerly extension be placed back in the Circulation Element with a statement that it is the intent of the community at some time in the future to include an equestrian trail system as a part of the Circulation Element and include a reference to that effect in the existing map of the Moorpark Community Plan. It was moved by Councilmember Beaulieu that the motion be amended to include the provision that the maps which designate the corridor at College View Drive be changed to show the corridor at Collins Drive. Said motion was included in the main motion by the maker of the motion,Councilmember Harper, with the consent of the second. During discussion Councilmember Beaulieu left the bench, the time being 12:40 a.m., and returned at 12:42 a.m. The City Manager recommended that the red dotted lines not be removed from the maps at this time because it may jeoparadize our goal of having the freeways connected. He suggested, instead, the addition of verbage on the map that what is shown is not a precise alignment. On roll call said motion failed to carry by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Harper and Straughan; NOES: Councilmembers Beaulieu, Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; ABSENT: None. It was moved by Councilmember Beaulieu and seconded by Councilmember Prieto that the Circulation Element of the General Plan be approved and the Mitigated Negative Declaration be certified, with the following corrections: That all references to Fenmore Street be changed to Campus Park Drive and all references to Ponty Boulevard be changed to Collins Drive, specifically on page 23 of the document entitled, "Ventura County Circulation Element November 1977 ", and also on the two maps entitled, "Corridor Map, Map No. 1, Circulation Element of Ventura County General Plan ", and also Map No. 2; also that the precise alignment of the Moorpark Road extension and the 23/118 Connector be determined at a future date, leaving them as indicated with the choices on the map. It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded Straughan that the motion be amended to provide fi of the dotted line of the Moorpark Road Extension placement of points A and B where the dotted line a statement that the alignment will be studied at Said motion lost by the following roll call vote: by Councilmember )r the deletion only and the is removed, with some future date. AYES: Councilmembers Harper and Straughan; NOES: Councilmembers Beaulieu, Prieto and Mayor Yancy-Sutton; ABSENT: None. On roll call the main motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: Coundilmembers Beaulieu, Prieto, Straughan and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES: Councilmember Harper; ABSENT: None. By general consent, staff was directed to prepare.a resolution of approval indicating changes as stated in the main motion. The Mayor declared a recess, the time being 1:00 a.m. The meeting reconvened with all members present, the time being 1:10 a.m. It was moved by Councilmember Harper, seconded by Councilmember Prieto that the 2 maps prepared by the General Plan Sub - Committee depicting proposed equestrian trails and proposed bike paths and footpaths be included in the General Plan, Circulation Element, which motion was carried unanimously. 8. PUBLIC WORKS MATTERS 8.A. Acceptance of Subdivision Improvement Tract No. 2723 By general consent this matter was continued to the next regular meeting inasmuch as additional information is needed. 9. BUSINESS ITEMS 9.A. Adoption of Ordinance No.11, Consolidating Elections tintroduced 10/5/83) The City Attorney presented Ordinance No 11, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DEFERRING ITS GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO THE DATE OF THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION -10- It was moved by Councilmember Straughan, seconded by Councilmember Beaulieu and unanimously carried to waive further reading of said ordinance. It was :then moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember Straughan that said Ordinance No. 11, entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OY.MOORPARK DEFERRING ITS GENERAL MUNICIPAL, ELECTION TO THE DATE OF THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION be adopted, which motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Harper, Beaulieu, Prieto and Mayor Yancy - Sutton; NOES: None; ABSENT: None. 9.B. Resloution No. 83 -45, Relating to Conflict of Interest for City Attorney, City Clerk and City Treasurer The City Attorney presented Resolution No. 83 -45, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF.MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember Straughan that further reading of said resolution be waived and that said Resolution No. 83 -45 be adopted, which motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Straughan, Beaulieu, Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES: None; ABSENT: None. 9.C. Resolution Implementing School Facilities Fees By general consent this matter was continued to the Regular Meeting of November 2, 1983. 9.D.Resolution No. 83 -46 - Implementing Police Facilities Fees The City Attorney presented Resolution No. 83 -46 - entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, RESPECTING ADMINISTRATION FEES FOR POLICE FACILITIES. It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Councilmember Harper that further reading of said Resolution be waived and that said Resolution No. 83 -46 be adopted, which motion was carried by the following roll call vote: -11- AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Harper, Beaulieu, Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES: None; ABSENT: None. 9.E. Resolution No 83 -47 - Implementing Fire Facilities Fees The City Attorney presented Resolution No. 83 -47, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF.-THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, RESPECTING ADMINISTRATION FEES FOR FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES It was moved by Councilmember Straughan, and seconded by Councilmember Beaulieu that further reading of said resolution be waived, and that said Resolution No. 83-47 be adopted, which motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES.: Councilmembers Straughan, Beaulieu, Harper, Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES: None; ABSENT: None. 9.F. Public Employees Retirement System - Actuarial Agreement It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Councilmember Harper to authorize the City Manager to execute on behalf of the City, that certain contract with the Public Employees' Retirement System for making a valuation of the eontribitions to be made by the City upon its entering:said retirement system. Motion carried by the following roll call "vote: AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Harper, Beaulieu, Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES: None; ABSENT: None. 9.G. Group Insurance Coverage - Agreement with Simi Valley It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember Beaulieu to approve the agreement with the City of Simi Valley for special services rendered to the City of Moorpark relating to group insurance coverages, and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said agreement on behalf of the City. Motion carried by the following rollcall vote: AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Beaulieu, Prieto, Straughan and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES: None; ABSENT: None. -12- 9.H. Approval of Warrants It was moved by Councilmember Straughan, seconded by Councilmember Beaulieu and unanimously carried that demands totaling $4,653.09, as approved by the City Manager, be approved, and that warrants be drawn for each of the following, to wit: DEMAND NO. MADE BY AMOUNT 54 Pacific Telephone $ 162.00 55 Moorpark News 204.50 56 University of CA Extension 100.00 57 Mary Jo Rasey 292.04 58 Doris D. Bankus 675.25 59 Niall Fritz 1,180.97 60 IBM 81.35 61 Bank of A. Levy 1,972.98 Total $4,653.09 10. PLANNING MATTERS 10.A.Resolution No. 83 -48 Extending Certain Land Use Entitlements The City Attorney presented Resolution No. 83 -48, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING CERTAIN LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Councilmember Beaulieu that further reading of said resolution be waived and that said Resolution No. 83 -48 be adopted; motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Beaulieu, Harper, Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton; NOES: None; ABSENT: None. 11. DISCUSSION ITEMS ll.A.Regulating Discharge of Firearms - Lt. Arve Wells, Sheriff's Dept. Lt. Arve Wells, of the Ventura County Sheriff's Department, gave a presentation on existing regulations pertaining to the discharge of firearms, and suggested that a study be made of the specific areas of concern in the City, and regulations be drawn to address those specific areas of concern. The following persons addressed Council in support of regulation of the discharge of firearms in the City: Doris Miller, 6395 Gabbert Road, Moorpark Gerry Goldstein, 11932 Los Angeles Avenue, Moorpark Mayor Yancy- Sutton also read a letter from Madeline Hartley, 5950 Gabbert Road, Moorpark, in support of regulation of firearms discharge. -13- By unanimous consent, Lt. Wells was requested to supply the City Attorney with samples of ordinances of neighboring cities and to work with the City Attorney in the preparation of an ordinance to be submitted to the Council at a later date. 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS 12.A.Mayor Yancy- Sutton stated that it had been brought to her attention, and to that of the other members of the City Council, that custodial work for the Community Center was being performed by the members of the Recreation and Parks Commission; that this was not the function of the Commissioners, nor was it ever the intention of the City Council that such duties be performed by the Commissioners. She requested and received unanimous consent to address a letter of apology to the Commissioners, said letter to also include assurances that the Commissioners are not to perform such duties in the future. 12.B.Resolution No. 83 -49 - Regarding Permit Approval Processes The City Attorney persented and read in its entirety Resolution No. 83 -49, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF -THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, AMENDING SECTIONS (e) AND (f) OF RESOLUTION NO. 83-29, ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 7, 1983, REGARDING PERMIT APPROVAL PROCESSES It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember Straughan that said resolution be adopted; motion carried by,the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Straughan, Beaulieu, And Prieto; NOES: Mayor Yancy- Sutton; ABSENT: None. 12.C.Councilmember Beaulieu requested information regarding the status of the study on the banning of aluminium wiring in the City, and it was agreed that he would work with the City Manager in researching the subject and report back to the Council at a later date. There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was adjourned, the time being 2:05 a.m. APPROVED: -14- Respectfully submitted, DORIS D. BANKUS City Clerk