HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1983 1207 CC REGMoorpark, California
December 7, 1983
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California
was held on December 7, 1983, in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of
said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p. m. , Mayor Leta Yancy- Sutton
presiding.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council member Prieto.
3. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Beaulieu, Harper, Prieto, Straughan
and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
ABSENT: None;
OTHER CITY OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES PRESENT: Niall Fritz, City
Manager /Director of Community Development; Mark Allen, Jr.,
City Attorney, and Scott Field, Attorney at Law, both from the law
firm of Burke, Williams and Sorensen; Sgt. Dave Paige and
Commander Dennis Gillette, from the County Sheriff's Department;
and Doris D. Bankus, City Clerk.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
At the request of the City Clerk the approval of the minutes of the regular
meeting of November 16, 1983 was continued to the next meeting.
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
6. A. Development Plan No. DP -294 (Prudential Overall Supply)
Two communications were presented in opposition to the development, as
fol lows:
Bob Meadows, E. 1). , 1 1 855 l;lwin [load, ,Moorpark, California
Bob Crockford, Chairman, Moorpark COntnlunity Alliance,
1'. O. Box 175, 1\1(x)rpm-k, California
By general consent said Co1l1llll.I1llCat1011S were I-(V(2i V(d 111(1 nladL' lI pnI t Of
the file.
The City Manager gave an update report on the present form of treatment
of effluent and compliance with the Federal Clean Air and Water Act and
the National Cat egorial Pre- treatment Standards. He advised that the
County is presently preparing an industrial waste discharge ordinance
which will impose tighter standards than now exist, and which should be
adopted by the County within the next 2 months. He stated that the major
issue of the proposed plant will be what it can physically handle, and that
a decision will have to be made by the District Manager on each applica-
tion as to how it relates to the over -all operation of the plant. He suggested
that if approved, the subject development plan could be conditioned to
require Council review before a sewage "will serve" letter is issued to the
applicant, or before an industrial waste discharge permit is granted; or the
permit could be conditioned to provide that the industrial waste discharge
ordinance be adopted prior to the issuance of the "will serve" letter; or a
condition could be added to the land use permit to provide that in the event
that at any point the applicant's discharge becomes unacceptable to the
operating perimeters of the plant, the applicant would be required to bring
it into conformance with the new discharge requirements.
The City Manager then stated that he had made arrangements for
David Long, of the Regional County Sanitation District, to be present at
the meeting to answer technical questions concerning the proposed operation,
stating also that Mr. Long had been retained by Waterworks District No. 1
as a consultant on this project to assist in evaluating the proposed operation.
David Long then addressed Council, participating in a discussion regarding
the capability of Waterworks District No. 1 to handle the waste discharge
from the proposed operation, as well as the monitoring of such operation
to ensure there is no potential hazard to the public health, welfare and safety
within the City.
The City Manager then gave a further report on the matters which had been
requested by the Council at its meeting of November 16, 1983, as follows:
1) On the relocation of the external transformer to an internal
electrical room: the applicant will present information from Edison Company;
2) On the exterior sign: The applicant will comply with the request
of Council and replacel0e lighted signs on the exterior of the building with a
single cement monument -style sign.
3) Fencing: Recommends standard requirement of chain link fencing
with redwood slats on all industrial interior yard fencing, to comply with
request of Sheriff's Department to provide partial screening only for security
purposes.
4) Screening of storage area at rear of building: Recommends
outside storage to be conducted in M -2 Zone only where it would not be
visable from public right -of -way. At the rear of the building no outside
storage will be visable from the public right -of -way When the remainder of
the industrial park is developed.
S) Sidewalk: Public Works Agency recommends that sidewalk be
adjacent to the curb with no landscaping, in order to avoid maintenance
costs and problems.
-2-
6) Redesign of exterior of building: The applicant will present
revised rendering in response to concerns expressed by Council.
The public hearing was then declared open, and the following persons
representing Prudential Overall Supply addressed the Council in support
of the proposed operation:
Glen Gessford, Carlsberg Development Company
2800 - 28th Street, Santa Monica, California
Don R. Clark, 1661 E. Alton, Santa Ana, California
Blair Gallagher, 1661 Alton, Santa Ana, California
Roy Swedin, 281.1 Teagarden Street, San Leandro, California
During this portion of the public testimony there was discussion concerning
the amount of water used daily. Also, Mr. Gallagher stated that the
applicant would be prepared to go to the "state of the art" on treatment
during the operation of the plant.
During this portion of the public testimony Mr. Swedin presented revised
rendering of the proposed plant showing location of a cement monument -
like sign; relocation of the external transformer to an internal electrical
room; and redesign of the exterior of the building to soften the appearance.
The following individual addressed Council in opposition to the proposed
operation:
Bob Crockford, 7189 Walnut Canyon, Moorpark, California,
representing Moorpark Community Alliance.
There being no further testimony, the public hearing was declared closed.
Councilmember Harper expressed some concern about costs incurred in
the monitorirg of the operation, if approved, to which the City Manager
replied that the Water District is presently governed by the Board of
Supervisors; that while it is governed by the County, the City has authority,
through the Clean Water Act, to adopt an ordinance that would require
any user to comply with its terms; and that if the City becomes the
governing board of the District, then the City would be responsible for the
supervision of the operation, but that the cost would be covered by user fees.
After further discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Straughan and
seconded by Councilmember Prieto that DP -294 be approved, and that the
City Manager be directed to prepare for presentation at the Council Meeting
of December 21, 1983, a resolution of approval, including therein:
1) The standard conditions as recommended by the County;
2) An increase in landscaping of side yard -- that the fence be
installed on the property line, with the landscaping on the inside of the
fence;
3) Provide screening of the storage area;
-3-
4) Approve -changes in the architectural rendering as presented
at this meeting; and
5) Approve sidewalks as recommended by Staff.
At this point Councilmember Beaulieu stated that he could not support the
granting of the permit for the following reasons:
1. He has great reservations about the amount of water required
for the operation, as well as the regulation and monitoring of the output;
2. That he feels that there are many other industries that can be
developed to satisfy the lower -skill spectrum of the community without being
such a high user of a natural resource, that being water; and
3. That he does not feel that a denial of the proposed project would
deter other industries from coming into the city, and that commercial
developers will be quick to point out to prospective clients the attractive
qualities offered by the City.
It was moved by Councilmember Prieto, seconded by Councilmember
Straughan and unanimously carried that the motion be amended to include
a provision that the permit must comply with the provisions of the new
County ordinance to be adopted within 2 or 3 months.
It was moved by Councilmember Harper that the permit be conditioned
further to limit the user to an intake of 25, 000 gallons per day, and that
applicant be required to comply with the provisions of Sections 307(b) and
(c) of the Federal Clean Air and Water Act (1977) or the new County
ordinance, whichever is stricter. Motion was lost for lack of a second.
On roll call the motion to amend the main motion was carried by the following
vote:
AYES: Council members Prieto, Straughan, Beaulieu,
Harper and Mayor Yancy - Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
With the consent of the maker of the main motion, concurred in by the
second, the following condition was added to the main motion:
That the permit include a condition to provide that the Council
shall review the 'will serve" letter prior to its being granted.
On roll call the main motion, as amended, was carried by the following
vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Prieto and
Mayor Yancy Sutton;
NOES: Councilmembers Beaulieu and harper;
NOES: None.
-4-
The Mayor declared a recess, the time being 9:40 p. m. The Meeting
reconvened at 9:50 p. m. , with all members of the Council present.
7. OLD BUSINESS ITEMS - Continued from Council Meeting of 1.1 -16 -83
7. A. County -wide Water Conservation Plan
It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Councilmember
Harper that Resolution No. 83 -S6, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK DECLARING ITS INTENT TO SUPPORT THE
COUNTY WIDE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN, AND TO
PARTICIPATE IN A COUNTYWIDE EFFORT WITH OTHER
AGENCIES IN VENTURA COUNTY TO REDUCE WATER
CONSUMPTION AND TO IMPLEMENT THOSE WATER
CONSERVATION MEASURES WHICH THIS AGENCY
DETERMINES TO BE COST EFFECTIVE AND BENEFICIAL.
be adopted, which motion was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Harper, Beaulieu,
Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
7. B. Cooperative Purchasing with County
It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Councilmember
Harper that Resolution No. 83 -57, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MOORPAR K, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF THE COUNTY OF VENTURA
TO ENTER INTO A COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT
PURSUANT TO COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 224,
be adopted, which motion was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Harper, Beaulieu,
Prieto and Mayor Yancy - Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
7. C. Public Safety Sub - Committee
By general consent, the Council approved the recommendation of the
City Manager to form a Public Safety Sub - Committee, to consist of the
Mayor, the City Manager, and one other member of the Council, to review
and make recomendations to the Council on all matters relating to the pro-
vision of police, fire, ambulance, paramedic and disaster services to the
citizenry. The Mayor then appointed Councilmember Harper to serve
ad the third member of the committee.
-5-
7. I). Payment of Monies
After discussion concerning some of the
as presented by the City Attorney, it wa s
for suggested changes in the language, t o
meeting.
NON-AGENDA ITEM
language in the proposed ordinance
referred back to the City Attorney
be brought forward later in the
At this time Curran Cummings, Administrative Assistant to Supervisor
James Dougherty, Fourth District, presented Sue Borquez, who is the
Administrative Assistant for the Supervisor, covering the Moorpark area.
7. D. Payment of Monies (Continued)
The City Attorney presented Ordinance No. 12, entitled,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA,
ADDING CHAPTER 17 TO TITLE 3 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
OF THE CITY OF MOORPAR K, RELATING TO PAYMENT OF
CITY MONIES
as corrected pursuant to instructions received from Council earlier in
this meeting. It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by
Councilmember Beaulieu to waive further reading of said Ordinance No.
12, and that it be introduced, which motion was carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Council members Harper, Beaulieu, Prieto,
Straughan and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
8. NEW BUSINESS
8. A. Sheriff's Department Report Back
By general consent the report of the Sheriff's Department concerning
complaints registered by Jerry Goldstein at the Council Meeeting of
November 16, 1983, was received and filed. Commander Dennis Gillette
was present and received commendations from members of the Council on
the very professional manner in which the matter had been handled.
There was a discussion concerning the recommendations of the City
Manager for future handling of complaints against an employee of the City;
Council concurred with recommendations of the City Manager.
8.13. Annual Christmas Celebration
By general consent the report of the City Manager, dated December 7,
1983, concerning the scheduled Christmas celebration, was approved
and ordered received and filed.
8. C. Disaster Agreement
By general consent this matter was continued to the meeting of December 21,
1983, in order to allow Councilmember Prieto an opportunity to report
back after his attendance of a Disaster Council meeting on December 16.
Councilmember Prieto also to obtain estimated cost to City.
8. D. Economic Development
By general consent the City Manager was directed to work with the Chamber
of Commerce in preparing an economic development brochure for the City,
such brochure and any related production expenses to be subject to final
approval by the City Council.
8. E. Transfer of Funds - Areas of Contribution:
Los Angeles Avenue
Gabbert - Casey Roads
Tierra Rejada - Moorpark Roads
It was moved by Councilmember Harper, seconded by Councilmember Beaulieu
and unanimously carried that the Mayor be authorized to sign the respective
agreements with the County of Ventura pertaining to the three Areas of
Contribution itemized above.
-7-
8. F. Warrants
It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Council member
Harper that demands totaling $3, 577. 33, as approved by the City Manager,
be approved, and that warrants be drawn for each of the followin g, to wit:
DEMAND NO. C1-I ILA ANT AMOUNT
93
Professionally Speaking
30.00
94
James A. Hartley
25.00
95
Suzanna Prieto
25.00
96
Jim Weak
25.00
97
Tom Schleve
25.00
98
Doris Miller
25.00
99
John Wozniak
25.00
1.00
Margaret Sabine
25.00
101
Irene Barrera
25.00
102
Dan Rasey
25.00
103
Carroll Roe
25.00
104
John C. Gedney
50.00
105
Niall Fritz
1,180.97
106
Doris D. Bankus
675.25
107
Mary Jo Rasey
266.28
108
Niall Fritz
82.00
109
City of Simi Valley
299.51
110
Leta Yancy- Sutton
50.00
111
Albert Prieto
50.00
112
Roger Beaulieu
50.00
113
Clinton D. Harper
50.00
114
Jerry Straughan
50.00
115
More Copy Systems, Inc.
493.32
TOTAL $ 3,577.33
Motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Harper, Beaulieu,
Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
8. G. Amendment to Sales and Use Tax Ordinance.
The City Attorney presented Ordinance No. 13, entitled:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ORDINANCE NO. 3 IMPOSING
A SALES AND USE TAX TO BE ADMINISTERED BY TI4E
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION.
He explained the ordinance and the reason for its adoption, stating that
since it relates to taxes for the usual and current expenses of the City,
it will take effect immediately upon its adoption.
It was moved by Councilmember Straughan, seconded by Councilmember
Harper and unanimously carried that further reading of said Ordinance
be waived.
It was then moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Council-
member Harper that said Ordinance No. 13, entitled as above, be
adopted, which motion was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council members Straughan, Harper, Beaulieu, Prieto
and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
A13SENT: None.
8. H. Conduct of Meetings
The City Attorney presented a resolution which he had prepared establishing
rules of conduct of Council meetings, which resolution had been distributed
previously to members of the Council, who had provided input regarding
contents. After reviewing the comments provided by Council members, the
resolution was referred back to the City Attorney for final preparation, to
be on the agenda for the next Council meeting.
8. 1. Work Program
By general consent the Work Program was referred back to the City Manager
with the request that he prioritize the items listed therein.
9. COUNCIL COMMENTS
9. A. Mobilehome Park Rent Control (Non- agenda item)
Councilmember Harper stated that he had attended the hearing on the applica-
cation of Leasco for a rent increase at Villa del Arroyo Mobilehome Park
held December 5, 1983 before the Mobilehome Park Rent Review Board. He
recommended that the City Council authorize the Board to hold study sessions
to consider revisions to the 'rent control ordinance (Ordinance No. 7) to make
clarify the requirements and procedures contained therein.
Wally Todd III, Chairman of the Mobilehome Park Rent Review Board,
addressed Council in support of Councilmember Harper's recommedation.
After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by
Councilmember Straughan that the Mobilehome Park Rent Review Board be
authorized to hold public study sessions to discuss possible revisions to the
mobilehome park rent control ordinance, and to submit suggested revisions
to the City Attorney for drafting the necessary amendments, subject to his
approval. Said motion was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Straughan, Beaulieu,
and Prieto;
NOES: None;
ABSTAIN: Mayor Yancy - Sutton.
-9-
I 0. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, it was moved by Councilmember
Beaulieu, seconded by Councilmember Straughan and unanimously
• carried that the meeting adjourn, the time being I. l: 15 p. m.
• Respectfully submitted,
Doris D. Bankus
City Clerk
APPROVED:
2 .
— • ,
00/1",". 4.4 fir.00
0101•1,
ayor
•
- 0
10. AIAOURNMENT
There being no further business, it was moved by Councilrnember
Beaulieu, seconded by Councilmember Straughan and unanimously
carried that the meeting adjourn, the time being I 1 :15 p. m.
APPROVED:
Mayor
Respectfully submitted,
_lo_
Doris D. Bankus
City Clerk