HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1984 0502 CC REGMoorpark, California
May 2, 1984
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark,
California, was held on May 2, 1984, in the Council Chambers in
the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue,
Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m., Mayor Leta Yancy-
Sutton presiding.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Al Prieto.
3. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Roger Beaulieu, Clinton D. Harper,
Albert Prieto, Jerry Straughan and Mayor Leta
Yancy- Sutton;
ABSENT: None.
OTHER CITY OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES PRESENT:
Marshall W. Julian, City Manager; Niall Fritz, Director of
Community Development; Mark C. Allen, Jr., City Attorney,
and Scott Field, Attorney at Law, both from the firm of
Burke, Williams and Sorensen; Lt. Arve Wells, County
Sheriff's Department; and Doris D. Bankus, City Clerk.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None.
5. PUBLIC COMMENT
5.A. Request from Urban West to be heard re: Mountain Meadows
Private TV Cable System
Thefollowing persons addressed Council regarding the subject matter:
Tom Zanic, of Urban West Communities, 3030 S. Bundy Drive
Los Angeles, California 90066
Richard Sklar, 45 Belden Place, San Francisco, California,
representing Entertainment Express Corporation
Both Mr. Zanic and Mr. Sklar presented a proposal for approval of
the installation of a private TV cable system to serve the Mountain
Meadows Planned Community (PC -3). The proposal consisting of a
suggested form of franchise agreement.
-1-
After discussion it was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded
by Councilmember Straughan that the Council supports the request
of Urban West Communities, and that staff and the City Attorney be
directed to work with Urban West Communities on a revised non-
exclusive franchise agreement, and that the matter be returned to
the Council for consideration at a future meeting.
Councilmember Straughan then moved that the motion be amended to
provide that the negotiated franchise agreement be returned to the
Council for consideration at its next regular meeting, May 16,
which motion was seconded by Councilmember Harper and unanimously
carried.
The main motion was then carried by unanimous vote.
The City Attorney then advised
notice of hearing regarding the
area proposed to be covered by
structed by the City Council.
6. COMMENDATIONS /PROCLAMATIONS
that the City Clerk publish a
subject matter, indicating the
the system, and she was so in-
6.A. Resolution of Commendation - Sheriff Al Jalat
Mayor Yancy- Sutton read a Resolution of Commendation, signed by
all members of the City Council and to be presented to Sheriff
Jalaty at a special retirement tribute to be held May 3, 1984.
Said resolution was adopted by general consent, and was signed
by all members of the City Council.
7. HEARINGS
7.A. Southern California Edison Company - Application
for Franchise (continued from April 18, 1984)
By general consent this matter was continued to May 16, 1984.
7.B. Southern California Gas Company - Application
for Franchise (continued from April 18, 1984)
By general consent this matter was continued to May 16, 1984.
7.C. Development Plan PD -301 (Ted Tomasovich, CC &F,
23 Freeway Properties Inc.) to construct a
104,500 square foot industrial building - Freeway
Business Center
The Director of Community Development gave an overview of the
application; also presenting a communication dated May 1, 1984,
from John C. Crowley, Manager, Development Services Division,
Real Property Services, Public Works Agency of the County of
Ventura, discussing the installation of a traffic signal at
-2-
Los Angeles Avenue and Science Drive, and suggesting a condition
to be added to DP 301 to provide for such installation.
Under discussion, Councilmember Harper suggested that Condition 19
be modified to provide that all signs shall be subject to review
by the Planning Commission, stating also, that he would like to
request the Planning Commission to undertake a study of our
existing sign ordinance.
The public hearing was then declared open, and the City Clerk
presented Affidavit of Posting of Notice of this hearing at the
three public places in the City, as designated by the Moorpark City
Council by Resolution No. 83 -11, adopted July 2, 1983.
The following persons addressed Council regarding the matter:
Robert E. Warren, of Price Engineering, P. O. Box 312,
810 Railroad Avenue, Santa Paula, CA 93060
Stephen B. Barasch, of Parasch Architects & Assoc., Inc.,
25 N. Mentor, Pasadena, California 91106
Both the foregoing gentlemen discussed with members of the City
Council and the City Attorney the matter of the proposed traffic
signal at Los Angeles Avenue and Science Drive, being particularly
concerned with the appropriate language for the condition to be
added to the Permit which would require the installation of the
traffic signal.
Mr. Barasch also gave a presentation on the building design and
materials.
George S. Moore, Landscape Architect, representing the
applicant, 21 S. California Street, Ventura
Mr. Moore described the planned landscape and there was some dis-
cussion concerning Caltrans' requirements and policies regarding
proximity of trees to the rights -of -way.
There being no further testimony, the hearing was declared closed.
It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Councilmember
Harper that the Council does find that the proposed project will
not have a significant effect on the environment; has reviewed and
considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and does certify that the Mitigated Negative Declara-
tion has been completed in compliance with CEQA and State EIR
Guidelines issued thereunder. Motion carried unanimously.
It was then moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Coun-
cilmember Beaulieu that DP -301 be approved with the modification of
-3-
Condition No. 19, as approved by the Planning Commission, to
read as follows:
1119. That signs are subject to the City of Moorpark
Ordinance Code, Article 24, Sign Ordinance. A
sign permit is required. All signs shall be
reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to
issuance of a permit."
and the addition of Condition No. 45, to read as follows:
"45. That prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance,
the developer shall enter into an agreement with
the City of Moorpark for the installation of a
traffic signal on Los Angeles Avenue and Science
Drive. Said traffic signal shall be installed
prior to occupancy of DP 301, except that occupancy
may be approved by the City Council if Caltrans
will not allow the installation prior to occupancy
of DP 301."
After discussion it was moved by Councilmember Straughan and
seconded by Councilmember Beaulieu that the motion be amended to
include the provision that line -of -site drawings be submitted to
the Planning Commission for consideration, and that the project be
referred to the Planning Commission for consideration of continuing
the exposed aggregate around the back side of the building.
The motion on the amendment was carried unanimously.
The vote on the main motion was carried unanimously.
It was then moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Coun-
cilmember Beaulieu that Resolution No. 84 -83, entitled,
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
PLAN PERMIT NO. DP -301, ON APPLICATION OF TED
TOMASOVICH, CC &F, 23 FREEWAY PROPERTIES INC."
be adopted, which motion was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Beaulieu, Harper,
Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
RECESS
The Mayor declared a recess, the time being 8:50 p.m.
The meeting was reconvened at 9:04 p.m., all members of the Council
being present.
-4-
7.D. GPA -84 -1 -- A.C.Construction /Gi lbert., cif- al /Happy
Camp Canyon /Tierra Rejada Valley (contir:_r�d from 4- 18 -84)
— - -
FIRST COMPONENT OF GPA -84 -1 - A -C Construction, Inc. and
Southeast Comml..inity Core Neighborhood
Mayor Yancy- Sutton declared a possible conflict of interest in
the A.C.Construction portion of the proposed General Plan Amend
ment, and turned the gavel over to Mayor pro tem A1. Prieto, who
then presided over the meeting. l
The Director of Community Development gave :i >v�-rv:i t:w of the /
status of the subject matter, stating that st.:aff had prepared
the two resolutions of.-approval as directed by Council at the
meeting of April 25 �.L 1984. His overview ;31 :sc� ()v red the fact
that information on flooding of the Arr.o.,c. '.iac irc-er. obtained and
was ready for presentation, and he gave a statrs report of the
analysis of the Public Works Agency regardinc .h, -irculation
needs of the area.
Mr. Ben Frank, of the County Flood District, addressed Council
with a presentation concerning the Arrovo Simi channel plans.
Councilman Straughan stated that he and `oil.nc lmer:ther Harper had
met with the representative of the owners of the subject property
and that the sense of the meeting was that ;_hc owners are very
sensitive to the concerns of the City.
It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember
Straughan as follows:
1. That the draft resolution prepared by staff be
tabled;
2. That staff and the Planning Commission establish a
"study area ", bounded on the south and east by the
Arroyo -Simi, on the north by Los Angeles Avenue, and
on the west by the extension of 'Tierra Rejada Road.
The purpose of the study area will be to consider land
use compatibility, drainage and traffic circulation,
and any other issues the Planning Commission deems
appropriate;
3. That as part of the study, the Planning Commission is
to consider the establishment of a new General Plan
land use designation, "Commerci.-il Office" and to be
considered a Planned Development, and to list appro-
priate permitted uses within such a category. If
deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission, areas
within the study area of the General. Plan should be
considered for possible desi.gnai -..nn as "Commercial
Office "; and
-5-
4. That the scope and depth of the study be adjusted by
staff so that a recommendation on an overall General
Plan Amendment for the study area can be made to the
City Council within a period not to exceed 90 days.
After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Harper and
seconded by Councilmember Straughan that Item 2 of the main motion
be modified to include the provision that the study include poten-
tial funding mechanisms for capital improvements.
The vote on the amendment was unanimous.
On roll call , the amended main motion was adopted by the following
vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Straughan and
Mayor pro tem Prieto;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None;
ABSTAIN: Councilmember Beaulieu and Mayor Yancy-Sutton.
Councilmember Beaulieu stated that he was abstaining because he
did not feel he had sufficient information to vote on the matter at
this time.
Mayor pro tem Prieto then handed the gavel back to Mayor Yancy-
Sutton, who then presided over the meeting.
SECOND COMPONENT OF GPA-84-1 - Earl and Patsy Gilbert, et al. _-
It was pointed out that the Gilbert property was also to be included
in the study area of the foregoing motion, and it was moved by
Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember Straughan that
action on the Gilbert component be tabled pending the outcome of the
staff and Planning Commission action on the study area, which
motion was carried unanimously.
THIRD AND FOURTH COMPONENTS OF GPA-84-1 - HAPPY CAMP REGIONAL PARK
AND TIERRA REJADA COMPONENTS
It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember
Straughan that reference to the Gilbert Land Use Element be deleted
from the title of the draft resolution, as presented by the City
Attorney' s office; that reference to the Gilbert Land Use Element
be deleted from paragraphs, 1 , 2 , 3 and 6 of the draft resolution,
and that the resolution, so modified, being. No. 84-84 , entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE MOORPARK GENERAL PLAN BY ADOPTING
GPA-84-1 (HAPPY CAMP PARK - TIERRA REJADA)
be adopted, which motion was carried by the following roll call
vote:
-6-
AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Straughan, Beaulieu,
Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
7.E. Resort of Bids - Legal Advertising
The City Manager gave an overview of the subject matter, explaining
that the public hearing on this matter had been continued from the
meeting of April 18, 1984, in order to provide an opportunity for
any person to challenge the qualification of any bidder or object
to the s ;ti f f.i cie ncy of any bid.
The Mayor announced that this was a continuation of a public
hearing, and issued an invitation to anyone who desired to address
the Council.. There being no response, the hearing was closed.
It was moved by Councilmember Beaulieu, seconded by Councilmember
Harper an6 unanimously carried that the bids be referred to the
City Attorney and City Manager for report and recommendation.
8. REPORTS OF COUNCILMEMBERS
8.A. Councilmember Straughan - Fiscal Year Reorganization
Councilmember Straughan presented and read in full his memorandum
to the ''ity Council dated May 2, 1984, and urged favorable support.
Councilmembers Harper, Beaulieu, Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton
stated their opinions that any reorganization should be done after
an election; however, by general consent the matter was referred to
the staff for review and recommendation.
8.B. Councilmember Harper - Ad Hoc Traffic Committee -
Los Angeles Avenue
Councilmember Harper gave a status report on the most recent
meeting of the Ad Hoc Traffic Committee, consisting of representa-
tives of Caltrans, CC & F, and the City, formed to study the traffic
problem on Los Angeles Avenue in the vicinity of Princeton Avenue
and the CC & F Industrial Park (Condor Drive).
9. REPORTS OF STAFF
9.A. Acceptance of Deeds - Community Center and Park Properties
The City Manager reviewed his staff report dated May 2, 1984, after
which it was moved by Councilmember Straughan, seconded by Council-
member Harper and unanimously carried that the sum of $748,650.34,
representing the amount of principal funds deposited in the Quimby
Trust Fund for the Moorpark area since 1977, be accepted from the
County and that the City Treasurer be directed to establish a
-7-
separate account for said funds in order that they may be
reserved for their intended use in developing and equipping
parks.
It was then moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by
Councilmember Beaulieu that Resolution No. 84 -85, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED TO
MOORPARK COMMUNITY CENTER AND SEVEN PARK SITES
AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE CERTIFICATE
OF ACCEPTANCE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY
be adopted, which motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Beaulieu, Harper,
Prieto and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
Councilmember Beaulieu was excused and left the meeting, the time
being 10:12 p.m.
9.B. Construction of Sound - Proofing Wall - City Hall
The City Manager presented and reviewed his report dated April 27,
1984, regarding the subject matter, and it was moved by Council -
member Prieto, seconded by Councilmember Harper and unanimously
carried that the City Manager be authorized to seek informal bids
and have a soundproof wall constructed along the north line of the
City Hall space within the Community Center, at a cost not to exceed
$1,500.00.
Councilmember Straughan suggested that the Recreation and Parks
Commission be kept informed regarding the progress of the City
Hall construction.
Councilmember Harper suggested that the City express appreciation
to Moorpark College for the offer to the City of office space at
the College.
Councilmember Harper also suggested that Staff proceed with the
necessary steps for the construction of the Council dais in the
multi - purpose room of the Community Center.
Councilmember Straughan reported that he had received input from
members of the Recreation and Parks Commission requesting that
when the remodeling of the multi - purpose room is done, it should
be considered that the room is used for dancing, with live band.
Councilmember Harper volunteer to work with staff on the design,
and stated he would report back on design and cost at a later
meeting.
9.C. Review of 5 Requests to Amend General Plan -- Preliminary
Screenina
The Director of Community Development presented his report dated
May 2, 1984, and gave background information on the preliminary
screening process adopted by the City Council on December 21, 1983.
His report also explained in detail each of the 5 requests to be
screened by the Council at this time.
Mayor Yancy- Sutton expressed a possible conflict of interest regarding
the 1st project to be screened, Griffin Development Company, and she
passed the gavel to Mayor pro tem Prieto, who then presided over the
meeting.
1. Griffin Development Company
Project location: 254 acre site, located immediately north
and west of Moorpark College
Elaine Freeman, of Griffin Homes, 19436 Ventura Boulevard, Tarzana,
California, addressed Council in support of the proposed amendment
to the General Plan.
After discussion it was moved by Councilmember Straughan and
seconded by Councilmember Harper that the request be approved for
further processing, which motion carried by the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Harper and
Mayor pro tern Prieto;
NOES: None;
ABSENT; Councilmember Beaulieu;
ABSTAIN; Mayor Yancy- Sutton.
Mayor pro tem Prieto then handed the gavel back to the Mayor, who
then presided over the meeting.
2. Carlsberg Construction Company
Project location: The 126 acre amendment request consists
of portions of a larger 478 acre area that is bounded by
Tierra Rejada Road to the south, Moorpark Road to the west,
New Los Angeles Avenue to the north and the Moorpark Freeway
to the east. The parent site is presently being processed
as Planned Community No. 4.
The Director of Community Development gave an overview of the
proposed amendment, after which the following individuals addressed
Council in support of the request:
Glen Gessford, of Carlsberg Development Co.,
2800 28th Street, Santa Monica, CA
Michael M. Mitchell, of Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall
(DMJM), Architect, 3250 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA
Merle Henry, of Carlsberg Development Co.,
2800 28th Street, Santa Monica, CA
Z�
After considerable discussion, it was moved by Councilmember
Straughan and seconded by Councilmember Harper that the entire
request for further processing approval of the proposed General
Plan amendment be denied, which motion carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Harper, and
Prieto;
NOES: Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu.
3. Dr. Raymond Caren
Project location: The site contains approximately 35,000
quare feet of lot area and consists of a 12,000 square foot
industrial building. The amendment is located adjacent
and north of Poindexter Road approximately 275 feet west
of Moorpark Avenue in the City of Moorpark.
The Director of Community Development gave a brief explanation of
the request, after which John Newton, of 165 High Street, Moorpark,
representing the applicant, addressed Council in support of the
proposed amendment.
After discussion it was moved by Councilmember Straughan and
seconded by Councilmember Harper that the request for further
processing be approved, it being agreed to include the properties
to the immediate east to eliminate the spot zoning; also that the
amendment be submitted in such a way that would permit other potential
land uses that may be adopted by the Planning Commission. Said motion
was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Harper, Prieto and
Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu.
4. Fred Kavli
Project location: The 12.3 acre amendment site represents
portion of a larger 53.68 acre parcel that is located
adjacent and east of the intersection of Condor Drive and
Los Angeles Avenue.
The Director of Community Development gave a brief description of
the request and the following individuals addressed Council in
support:
Fred Kavli, 20869 Plummer Street, Chatsworth, CA 91311
John Kulwiec, Architect, 330 N. Wood, Camarillo, CA
It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember
Straughan that the request for further processing be approved, as
recommended by staff, which motion carried by the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Straughan Prieto
and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu.
-10-
5. S. H. Bulmer & Associates
Project location: The 348.57 acre amendment site is located
adjacent to and west of Walnut Canyon Road, approximately
3,000 feet north of the Moorpark Community Center.
The Director of Community Development gave a brief overview of the
request and Dick Faucet, representing the applicant, stated that
He was prepared to answer any questions concerning the matter.
He stated that he felt certain that by working with staff they
could follow guidelines expressed by the Council and arrive at
something suitable for the property.
It was moved by Councilmember Straughan and seconded by Council -
member Prieto that the request for approval for further processing
on this project be approved, which motion carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Straughan, Prieto, Harper
and Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu.
RECESS
The Mayor declared a recess, the time being 11:17 p.m.
The meeting was reconvened, the time being 11:25, and all members
of the Council being present with the exception of Councilmember
Beaulieu, who was excused earlier in the meeting.
Carlsberg Construction Company
Councilmember Harper stated that inasmuch as Council had permitted
Dr. Raymond Caren, represented by John Newton, to amend his request,
it was felt that the same courtesy should be extended to Carlsberg
Construction Company, and requested that the public comment portion
of that particular agenda item be re- opened to permit the repre-
sentatives of that company to address Council.
Mr. Merle Henry, of Carlsberg Construction, addressed Council stating
that they would consider amending their request to include only the
high tech" industrial area adjacent to New Los Angeles Avenue.
Councilmember Harper moved that Council approve the request for
continuation of the processing of the amendment to the General
Plan, which motion was seconded by Councilmember Prieto, and
carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Prieto and
Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: Councilmember Straughan;
ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu.
9.D. Proposal of Griffin Development re: Planning Staff Assistance
The Mayor announced a possible conflict of interest and handed the
gavel to Mayor pro tem Prieto, who then presided over the meeting.
-11-
The City Manager presented his report dated April 27, 1984,
transmitting to the Council the offer of Griffin Development Co.
to fund, at a cost of approximately $30,000, the retention of
a planner, to assist the Director of Community Development in
the operation of the Planning Department of the City, primarily
because of the anticipated heavy workload during the next fiscal
year.
Elaine Freeman, of Griffin Development Company, addressed Council
regarding the proposal, stating that the main concern of Griffin
was the processing of the amendments to the General Plan, and
restating the offer of Griffin for the funding of the position,
stressing that in no way was it to be inferred that Griffin would
receive any special treatment if the City accepts the offer, but
that by assisting in the general workload of the department, it
would be anticipated that the General Plan amendments would be
processed in a timely manner.
After discussion, with the City Attorney expressing some reservations
regarding the acceptance of the offer, the following individual
addressed Council:
Jerry Goldstein, 11932 Los Angeles Avenue, Moorpark.
It was then moved by Councilmember Harper, seconded by Councilmember
Straughan and unanimously carried that (a) the proposal of Griffin
Development Company to provide funds not to exceed $30,000 for use
in obtaining additional planning personnel services be approved in
concept and referred to the City Attorney and the Director of
Community Development for preparation of a proposed agreement
relative to the use of said funds; and (b) that staff be directed
to prepare a job description and job announcement for publication
immediately after the agreement is considered at the next regular
City Council meeting.
Mayor pro tem Prieto thE,n returned the gavel to Mayor Yancy- Sutton,
who then presided over the meeting.
10. CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember
Straughan that the Consent Calendar be approved as recommended,
which motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Straughan, Prieto and
Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu.
10.A. Claim for Damage or Injury - Horacio Julio Bonahora
filed on behalf of Norma Bonahora
Motion to reject the Claim for Damage or Injury and the Amended
Verified Claim for Damage or Injury filed by Richard E. Moore,
-12-
Attorney at Law, on behalf of Norma Bonahora, et al., concerning
the death of Horacio Julio Bonahora on January 13, 1984, and
refer the matter to the City Clerk for further handling.
10.B. Claim filed by Pacific Sewer Maintenance Corporation re
deaths of Michael Allen Skinner and Horacio Julio Bonahora
Motion to reject the Claim of Pacific Sewer Maintenance Corporation
concerning the death of Michael Allen Skinner and Horacio Julio
Bonahora on January 12, 1984, and refer the matter to the City
Clerk for further handling.
10.C. Approval of Warrants - Demands totaling $14,524.40, as
approved by the City Manager, be approved , and that warrants be
drawn for each of the following, to wit:
DEMAND NO.
CLAIMANT
AMOUNT
258
Employment Development Department
$ 775.14
259
State Treasurer
72.59
260
State Compensation Insurance Fund
334.93
261
I.B.M.
77.75
262
Professionally Speaking
30.00
263
V.C.A.G.
45.00
264
Moorpark News
561.16
265
Doris Miller
126.93
266
Marshall Julian
4,860.00
267
Burke, Williams and Sorensen
1,505.51
268
League of California Cities
75.00
269
League of California Cities
75.00
270
V.C.A.G.
2,003.00
271
Leta Yancy- Sutton
100.00
272
Albert Prieto
100.00
273
Roger Beaulieu
100.00
274
Clinton D. Harper
100.00
275
Jerry Straughan
100.00
276
James A. Hartley
25.00
277
Doris Miller
25.00
278
Suzanna Prieto
25.00
279
Jim Weak
25.00
280
Tom Schleve
25.00
281
Tom Baldwin
25.00
282
Irene Barrera
25.00
283
Danny Rasey
25.00
284
Carroll Roe
25.00
285
Margaret Sabine
25.00
286
Mark Barrera
40.00
287
John C. Gedney
50.00
288
Heather Rasey
30.00
289
Rebecca Rasey
30.00
290
City of Simi Valley
523.05
(Continued next page)
-13-
DEMAND NO. (Continued) CLAIMANT AMOUNT
291 Doris D. Bankus 738.30
292 Niall Fritz 1,292.34
293 Mary Jo Rasey 491.45
294 Niall Fritz 37.25
GRAND TOTAL $14,524.40
11. ORDINANCES /RESOLUTIONS
ll.a. Proposition 18 on June 5, 1984 ballot - Park Funds
It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember
Straughan that Resolution No. 84 -86, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA,
SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 18 WHICH PLACES BEFORE THE
VOTERS OF CALIFORNIA JUNE 5, 1984 A BOND MEASURE
TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR PARKS AND RECREATIONAL LAND
ACQUISITION, DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER RELATED PURPOSES
be adopted, which motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Straughan, Prieto and
Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu.
ll.b. Purchase of Surplus Equipment
It was moved by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember
Prieto that Resolution No. 84 -87, entitled:
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING CERTAIN CITY
OFFICIALS AND /OR EMPLOYEES AS REPRESENTATIVES
TO ACQUIRE FEDERAL SURPLUS PROPERTY ON BEHALF
OF SAID CITY
be adopted, which motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Prieto, Straughan and
Mayor Yancy- Sutton;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: Councilmember Beaulieu.
12. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None.
13. ADJOURNMENT
By general consent the Council adjourned to an executive session
to discuss potential litigation, the time being 12 :00 midnight.
-14-
The meeting was reconvened at 12 : 30 a.m. , all members being present
with the exception of Councilmember Beaulieu.
The City Attorney announced that several matters concerning potential
litigation had been discussed during the executive session.
There being no further business to come before the meeting, it was
moved by Councilmember Straughan, seconded by Councilmember Harper
and unanimously carried that the meeting stand adjourned, the time
being 12 : 32 a.m.
,Respectfully submitted ,
/1/
, t l
G, X/ J 1r',%- -/
APPROVED:
Mayor
-15-