HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1985 0429 CC ADJMoorpark, California
April 29, 1985
An" adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Moorpark, California, was held on April 29, 1985, in the Council
Chambers in the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark
Avenue, Moorpark.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m., Mayor Albert Prieto
presiding.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Danny Woolard.
3. ROLL CALL t
PRESENT: Councilmembers Thomas C. Ferguson, James D. Weak,
Danny Woolard, Leta Yancy- Sutton and Mayor Albert Prieto.
ABSENT: None.
OTHER CITY OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES PRESENT:
Steven Kueny, City Manager; Niall Fritz, Director of Community
Development; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; Lt. Arve Wells,
County Sheriff's Department; and Doris D. Bankus, City Clerk.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Moved by Councilmember Yancy- Sutton, seconded by Councilmember Weak
and unanimously carried to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting of April 1, 1985.
Moved by Councilmember Yancy - Sutton, seconded by Councilmember Weak
and unanimously carried to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting of April 15, 1985, as corrected.
Moved by Councilmember Weak, seconded by Councilmember Yancy - Sutton
and unanimously carried that the Notice of Adjournment of the
Adjourned Regular Meeting of April 22, 1985, as executed by the
City Clerk, be approved and filed in the official Minute Book of
City Council Meetings.
Moved by Councilmember Weak and seconded by Councilmember Woolard
that the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of April 23, 1985,
be approved. Said motion received an affirmative vote from all
members of the Council except Councilmember Yancy- Sutton, who
abstained because of her absence at said adjourned meeting.
-1-
4 -29 -85
5. PROCLAMATIONS /COMMENDATIONS /SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
5.A. Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program
Special Presentation by Dave McEwen, Bond Counsel
Mr. David R. McEwen, of the law firm of Stradling, Yocca, Carlson
& Rauth, Bond Counsel for the City, addressed Council with a
short presentation, describing the role of the Bond Counsel in this
matter.
He then presented Pamela Wiget, of Stone & Youngberg, the underwriter
for the bond program and the bonds, who made a short presentation
-- describing the mortgage interest rate which had been obtained for
the bonds. She stated that a rate of around 9.375% had been
achieved for the mortgage revenue bonds, and that this figure is
the lowest mortgage rate to be achieved in California this year
under the mortgage bond program.
The City Attorney then stated that all documents had been reviewed
by her office and that Council should proceed with the necessary
actions to formalize the program.
1. Ordinance No. 44, Adopting Home Mortgage Finance
Program and Authorizing Implementation of Program
The City Attorney presented Ordinance No. 44, entitled:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK AUTHORIZING A
HOME MORTGAGE FINANCE PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING AGENCY
OFFICERS TO IMPLEMENT THE PROGRAM"
It was moved by Councilmember Yancy- Sutton, seconded by Councilmember
Weak and unanimously carried to waive further reading of said
ordinance.
It was moved by Councilmember Yancy- Sutton and seconded by
Councilmember Weak that said Ordinance No. 44, entitled as herein -
above set forth, be adopted, which motion carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Yancy- Sutton, Weak, Ferguson,
Woolard and Mayor Prieto;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
2. Resolution No. 85 -190, Authorizing Issuance of $20,000,000
Principal Amount of Single Family Residential Mortgage
Revenue Bonds, Issue of 1985, Issued Pursuant to Trust
Indenture Dated as of Date of Bonds, Authorizing Sale
of Bonds, and Authorizing Execution of and Approving
Implementing Agreements, Documents and Actions.
The City Attorney presented Resolution No. 85 -190, entitled:
-2-
Hwz -o H
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $20,000,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT
OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS, ISSUE
OF 1985, SUCH BONDS TO BE ISSUED PURSUANT TO A TRUST
INDENTURE DATED AS OF THE DATE OF THE BONDS, AUTHORIZING
THE SALE OF SUCH BONDS, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN TERMS AND CON-
DITIONS, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AND APPROVING
IMPOEMENTING AGREEMENTS, DOCUMENTS AND ACTIONS"
It was moved by Councilmember Woolard, seconded by Councilmember
Yancy- Sutton and unanimously carried to waive further reading of
said resolution.
It was moved by Councilmember Yancy- Sutton and seconded by Council-
member Woolard that said Resolution No. 85 -190, entitled as hereinabove
set forth, be adopted, which motion carried by the following roll
call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers
Weak and Mayor
None;
None.
Yancy - Sutton, Woolard, Ferguson,
Prieto;
3. Approval of Developer Agreements
It was moved by Councilmember Yancy- Sutton, seconded by Councilmember
Weak and unanimously carried that the Developer Agreements with Urban
West Communities, U.S. Condominium, Warmington Homes, and Regal Homes
be approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk authorized to execute same.
It was moved by Councilmember Weak and seconded by Councilmember
Woolard that the Developer Agreement with Griffin Homes be approved,
which motion was carried unanimously, with Councilmember Yancy - Sutton
abstaining because of a possible conflict of interest.
RECESS
The Mayor declare a recess, the time being 7:15 p.m.
The meeting reconvened at 7:25 p.m., all members of the Council being
present.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Gerry Spencer, 790 Poindexter, Moorpark, addressed Council as a
representative of the City on the Ventura County Area Housing Authority.
She distributed copies of the 13th Annual Report, dated February 24,
1985, and stated that favorable comments were made in the report
regarding the senior citizen housing currently under construction
in Moorpark. She also expressed appreciation to the Council for
having provided her the opportunity to serve on the Commission.
-3-
4 -29 -85
6. HEARINGS
6.A. Fiscal Year 1985 -86 Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Program (continued from April 1, 1985;
hearing remained open)
Resolution No. 85 -191 Approving Application for
Funding from General Allocation of State CDBG Program
The Director of Community Development presented and reviewed his
report dated April 15, 1985, and participated in discussion with
members of the Council.
The Mayor stated that the hearing had been continued from the
meeting of April 1, 1985, and invited anyone who desired to do so
to address Council regarding the subject matter. The following
person addressed Council in support of tkie application:
Karen Flock, 11011 Azahar, Saticoy, CA 93004
There being no further public testimony to be heard in this matter,
the hearing was declared closed.
There was discussion regarding fact that application for the grant _
was being considered prior to the filing of an application for a
general plan amendment, and the City Attorney stated that the
approval of the filing of an application for grant could not be
construed as guaranteeing approval for the general plan amendment.
It was then moved by Councilmember Weak and seconded by Councilmember
Woolard that Resolution No. 85 -191, entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN APPLICATION
FOR FUNDING FROM THE GENERAL ALLOCATION OF THE
STATE CDBG PROGRAM
be adopted, and that a letter be forwarded to Villa Campesina
explaining that the approval of the grant application is not an
approval of the general plan amendment. Motion carried by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Weak, Woolard, Ferguson
and Mayor Prieto;
NOES: Councilmember Yancy- Sutton;
ABSENT: None.
Councilmember Yancy- Sutton requested that the record reflect that
her reason for voting No on this matter was because she was opposed
to the way in which it was handled; and'that it was her desire to
make certain that all applications or proposals submitted to the -"
City are handled in an equal manner.
4 -29 -85
7. ORDINANCES /RESOLUTIONS
7.A.. Resolution No. 85 -185 re Personnel Rules
The City Manager presented Resolution No. 85 -185 re Personnel Rules,
stating that all corrections had been made and new language added
pursuant to Council instructions and advice of the City Attorney,
and that the resolution was now ready for consideration.
After one correction in page 17 regarding removal of reference to
"merit increase ", the City Attorney presented Resolution No. 85 -185
entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PERSONNEL
SYSTEM RULES AND REGULATIONS
It was moved by Councilmember Yancy- Sutton and seconded by Council -
member Weak that said Resolution No. 85 -185 be adopted, which motion
carried by the following roll call vote:%
AYES: Councilmembers Yancy - Sutton, Weak, Ferguson,
Woolard and Mayor Prieto;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
7.B. Resolution Re Classification Plan
At the request of the City Manager, this matter was deferred to the
next meeting of the City Council, May 6, 1985.
8. STAFF REPORTS - RECOMMENDED ACTION ITEMS
8.A. Street Sweeping
The City Manager reviewed his report dated April 25, 1985 transmitting
the initial clean -up and regular sweeping schedule to be implemented
under the street sweeping program, and requesting clarification on
certain items contained therein. By general consent the following
instructions were approved:
a. The commercial areas on Los Angeles Avenue (Highway #118)
will be swept weekly, commencing at Park Lane, easterly
beyond Moorpark Road to Highway #23;
b. The commercial sweeping will not include sweeping in
front of the Varsity Park Shopping Center;
C. We will commence sweeping on a weekly basis on the
State Highways on approximately June 1, and will proceed
with negotiation of an agreement with Caltrans for such
sweeping; ,
d. On advice of the City Attorney, private streets are not
to be included in the street sweeping program of the City.
0615
4 -29 -85
B.B. Employee Bonds
The City Manager presented and reviewed his report dated
April 25, 1985 for the Public Employees Blanket Bond and Money
and Securities coverage. After discussion, it was moved by
Councilmember Yancy- Sutton and seconded by Councilmember Woolard
that the recommendation of the City Manager be approved, and the
bid of Ohio Casualty be accepted for the faithful performance and
honesty bond, and that the City self- insure for Money and Securities
coverage. Said motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Yancy- Sutton, Woolard, Ferguson,
Weak and Mayor Prieto;
NOES: None;
ABSENT: None.
8.C. Parks and Recreation Commission Recommendations
1. Senior Citizens Club Use of Community Center
2. Initiation of Summer Program
The City Manager reported that pursuant to instruction from the Council,
the Parks and Recreation Commission had considered the proposal to
permit the Senior Citizens Club to use the Community Center without
charge, and as a result, two members of the Commission had scheduled
a meeting with representatives of the Senior Citizens Club to
discuss their use of the Center and what type of programs they would
have here.
The City Manager then presented and reviewed his report dated
April 25, 1985 in regard to the recommendation of the Parks and
Recreation Commission that a temporary staff person be retained to
plan and coordinate a summer recreation program for the City. Said
report also outlined actions which had been taken by the Commission
in regard to the summer recreation program.
After considerable discussion the City Manager was instructed by
general consent to consult with other public agencies to see if
some arrangement could be agreed upon for the planning and coordination
of a summer recreation program, and to report back at the next Council
Meeting. The matter was then tabled by general consent.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE PACIFICA CORPORATION VS. CITY OF MOORPARK,
ET AL.
The City Attorney reported that we are now at the stage in the subject
litigation where all briefs have been filed, including an amicus curiae
brief from the County of Ventura in the support of the City and the
School District. The hearing date for hearing the oral arguments has
not been set yet, but would probably be in late May or early June.
She also reported that the Appellate'Court had ruled on an almost
identical case in Orange County, upholding the particular ordinance, -
4 -29 -85
holding that state law does not prohibit imposition of fees at
the time the building permits are issued.
9. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council at this
time, it was moved by Councilmember Weak, seconded by Councilmember
Ferguson and unanimously carried to adjourn, the time being 8:30 p.m.
APPROVED:
MAYOR
-7-
Respectfully submitted,
a
1
City Clerk