HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1986 0113 CC JNTMoorpark, California
January 13, 1986
A joint meeting of the Moorpark City Council and the ad hoc Design
Review Committee was held on January 13, 1986, in the Council Chambers
in the City City Hall of said City, located at 799 Mooppark Avenue,
Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m., Mayor James D. Weak
presiding.
Z. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Danny Woolard
3. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Thomas Ferguson, Albert Prieto,
Danny Woolard, Leta Yancy- Sutton and Mayor Weak;
ABSENT: None.
AD HOC DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT:
Lindal Graf, Wayne Jones, Kris Ogle, Tom Schleve and Phil Vein
OTHER CITY OFFICIALS PRESENT:
Richard Morton, Interim Director of Community Development,
and Doris D. Bankus, City Clerk.
4. DISCUSSON
4.A. Responsibilities of Committee
4.A.1. Sign Ordinance
The Interim Director Community Development presented and gave a
brief overview of a sign ordinance which had been the result of a
study by an ad hoc committee of the Planning Commission, suggesting
that the Design Review Committee use that as one document for
reference in studying a new sign ordinance, together with comments
which he had provided regarding the same. He also distributed a
draft ordinance furnished by the Building Industries Association
together with a communication dated January 7, 1986, regarding the
regulation of temporary residential subdivision signs.
Councilmember Yancy- Sutton suggested that the review of a proposed
sign ordinance be the first item on the agenda for study by this
ad hoc committee.
- 1 -
Then followed a discussion on procedures to be followed by the
committee and it was the general consensus that the proposed sign
ordinance be submitted to the Planning Commission for review, and
in order to provide an opportunity For the public to make comment
concerning its contents.
4.A.2 Landscape Standards
and
4.A.3 Architectural Theme
Committee Member Tom Schleve suggested that the order of items to
be studied by the Committee would be: (1) Sign ordinance; (2)
Architectural Theme; and (3) Landscape Standards.
Councilmember Yancy- Sutton suggested that the Landscape Standards
be studied before the Architectural Theme. Committee Member
Phil Vein aoreed with her, stating that the Landscape Standards
prepared by the County were, in his opinion, excellent ones and
could probably be adopted For use with very Few, if any, changes.
It was agreed that the landscape standards, once adopted, be regularly
enforceable by the Commission and the Council, and that these standards
become conditions of approval of any project and would be enforceable.
It was then suggested by Committee Member Schleve that a fourth item
be added to those to be addressed by the Committee, Streetscape on
High Street.
After a brief discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Yancy- Sutton
and seconded by Mayor Weak, that High Street Streetscape be the Fourth
item to be addressed by the Committee. Motion carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Yancy- Sutton, Prieto and Mayor Weak;
NOES: Councilmembers Ferguson and Woolard.
Committee Member Phil Vein suggested that one item the committee might
consider would be development standards for the City.
There was a brief discussion regarding the functions of the committee,
with the consensus being that the scope of issues addressed would be
either as suggested by the Council, or by the committee, itself.
A discussion then followed regarding the name of the committee, and
it was generally agreed, and so ordered, that the committee be officially
called "Oesign /Standards Committee ".
4.B. Relationship to City Council and Planning Commission
There was no further discussion regarding the subject of this item.
5. OTHER BUSINESS
William E. Windroth, Building and Safety District Supervisor, County
of Ventura, addressed Council and offered his services to the committee.
-2-
There was a brief discussion regarding proposed meeting dates,
with no firm decision being made at this time.
Bernardo Perez, Moorpark, addressed Council, in opposition to day -time
meetings, stating that most people would be precluded from attendance
because of their working hours, and that if it is the desire of Council
and the committee to receive public input, the meeting should be held
in the evening.
6. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to be discussed, it was moved by
Councilmember Yancy- Sutton, seconded by Councilmember Woolard and
unanimously carried that the meeting stand adjourned.
APPROVED:
Mayor
-3-
Respectfully submitted,
City Clerk