Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1987 0121 CC REGMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California January 21, 1987 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California was held on January 21, 1987, in the Council Chambers of City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:11 p.m. by Mayor Thomas Ferguson. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Galloway. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Eloise Brown, John Galloway, Clint Harper and Mayor Thomas Ferguson Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development; R. Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer; John Knipe, Assistant City Engineer; Lt. Mike Brown, County Sheriff's Department; Diane Eaton, Associate Planner; Michael Rubin, Senior Planner; Thomas Genovese, Director of Administrative Services; Gerald Forde, Director of Community Services; and Maureen Wall, City Clerk. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 4.A. Councilmember John Galloway asked that his comments under Item 8.B., of the minutes for the December 15, 1986 meeting, be amended to read, "not only will the property values not be impacted by the addition of the project, according to real estate agents and appraisers which he con- sulted, but also the home in which he currently resides is not owned by him but by his mother." MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilwoman Brown seconded a motion to approve the minutes as amended. The voice vote carried unanimously. 4.B. Councilmember Brown moved, Councilmember Harper seconded, a motion to approve the minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of December 22, 1986. On a voice vote, the motion carried unanimously. 4.C. The minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 7, 1987, were deferred to to the February 4, 1987 meeting. 5. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS /SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: There were none scheduled. 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS: 6.A. Mr. John Lane, 12591 Crystal Ranch Road, felt it was a sad time for citizens of Moorpark, due to the resignation of one of the Councilmembers Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 2 January 21, 1987 and the investigation by the District Attorney's Office. He wanted to let the Council know that he was in favor of a Special Election in June. 6.B. Mr. Bradford Dolliver, 12416 Willow Hill, asked for a Special Election so there would be an opportunity for the Council to be a Council of the people and not just the majority 6.C. Paul Smith, 12686 Countrymeadow Street, felt it was the right of the people to vote. He felt the interim appointee should be the person who obtained the highest number of votes in the last election; that person being Mr. John Patrick Lane. 6.D. Steve Brodsky, 4572 Vista del Valle, felt that Calprop, Tract #4037, had undercut the slope on the west edge of his property. He would like an independent review completed regarding that undercut. The City Engineer, Mr. Dennis Delzeit, responded he would prepare a report for the Council's review with a copy of that report being sent to Mr. Brodsky. 6.E. Joe Latunski, 289 Casey Road, stated staff is creating more work for themselves and causing citizens to fight among themselves. He asked that Council start doing what the people wanted and not what developers coming into the area might want. He also stated, he would like to see one -half, one, and one and one -half acre developments. 6.F. Pat Best, 12675 Williams Ranch Road, feels Moorpark is the "Peyton Place" of government at its very worst. She doesn't want to see a weak and feeble local government. She felt that the empty seat on the Council should come to a vote of the people. 6.G. Lawrence Paffendorf, 12569 Crystal Ranch Road, stated the best possible balance for the City Council would be that we would have an election for the vacant City Council seat. 6.H. Paul Lawrason, 4291 Ambermeadow Street, stated the City is currently divided and asked for a Special Election in June. He felt to appoint someone to the position, rather than having an election, would further divide the City. 6.1. James R. Brady, 12419 Sunnyglen Drive, stated the City Council was elected by the people, therefore, the vacant seat should also be elected by the people. He also stated that if there was a temporary appointment, that person should be the person who had the next highest vote in the last election. He urged the City Council to hear the voice of the people. 6.J. Tom Thompson, 12623 Hillside Drive, past president of the Tierra Rejada Neighborhood Council, did not feel a Special Election should be held which would cost the City money, but that the next highest vote - getter in the last election, Mr. John Lane, should be appointed to the unexpired term on the Council. 6.K. Michael Marion, 12573 Westmont Drive, felt a Special Election might restore credibility to the City Council. 6.L. Yvonne Watkin, 12592 Westmont Drive, asked Council to hold a Special Election, and lent her support to John Lane. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 3 January 21, 1987 6.M. Robert Silver, 4431 Honeyglen Court, stated long -term goals were set by the November 1986 Election, and asked Council to let the people speak of their needs through a Special Election in June of '87. 6.N. Mike McDowell, 12540 Crystal Ranch Road, urged the Council to call for a Special Election. 6.0. Barbara Shultz, 116 Sierra Avenue, asked Council to call for a Special Election, since she did not want to leave an appointment decision to the current Council. She felt there were a lot of people within the community who would make good Councilmembers, and did not want to leave that decision to only four people. 6.P. Cynthia Hubbard -Dow, 187 Shasta Avenue, stated not all of the Councilmembers currently have the same viewpoints. She also stated Mr. John Lane was not elected in November because the people did not want him elected. 6.Q. Patti Smith, 12686 Countrymeadow, current president of the Tierra Rejada Neighborhood Council, called for a Special Election, since an appointment would be tied to another member on the Council. 6.R. Bob Crockford, 7189 Walnut Canyon Road, asked Council to a response to a letter which he had directed to the Council regarding the BIA litigation. Staff will be reporting to Council regarding his letter. 6.S. Steve Sill, 12419 Willow Forest Drive, stated given the circumstances, the credibility and the integrity of the City is on the line. He felt the credible way to handle the situation would be to call for a Special Election. The necessary costs of the election are a must. He also stated the Council needed to allow the people to speak. 6.T. Danny A. Woolard, 487 Millard, stated that Council needed to have a Special Election, as there was already a crisis of confidence. They had no other credible choice. 6.U. Charles B. Schwabauer, 12681 Broadway, representing the Historical Society, informed the Council they are negotiating with Southern California Edison for use of a substation building as a possible site for at least an interim museum. The City, however, would require a Conditional Use permit at a cost of $1,400, if they utilize the substation building. He asked Council to waive the fee or to rescind the requirement of the fee for the Historical Society, since they operate solely on donations. He further stated that their improvements of the building would only consist of a parking lot, an access to Gabbert Road, and the relocation of a fence. Councilmember Harper asked if an agreement had been signed with Southern California Edison, and Mr. Schwabauer responded that a preliminary agreement had been signed, which allowed them to begin some of their renovation work. Council asked that this item be placed on the February 4, 1987 agenda. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR: 7.A. Approval of Warrant Register After some discussion and a reminder by Mayor Ferguson that local businesses Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 4 January 21, 1987 7.A. (Continued) be used whenever possible, Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to approve the Warrant Register as presented. The roll call vote was uananimous. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 8.A. Appeal No. 11, Regarding LDM -9 (G.H. Palmer Associates): Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development, gave his staff report. There were no questions of staff. The hearing was then opened for public comment. Mitchell B. Kahn, 500 Esplanade Boulevard, Oxnard, Attorney for Mr. Dan Palmer, stated that Mr. Palmer is withdrawing his appeal and the project because of the unsettling results of the EIR. He further stated, Mr. Palmer has no desire to spend an additional $100,000 for another EIR, when the current one has been ruled not acceptable. The public hearing was closed. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to accept the withdrawal of the Appeal No. 11. The voice vote was unanimous. 9. ORDINANCES /RESOLUTIONS: 9.A. Everett Braun (Zone Change ZC- 2811): Reintroduction of Ordinance No. 86 Diane Eaton, Associate Planner, gave a staff report indicating there had been an error in Section 2 of the Ordinance regarding both the type of commercial zoning and requirement for zoning restrictions, when the Council had introduced the Ordinance at their January 7, 1987 meeting. MOTION: On a motion by Councilmember Harper, seconded by Councilmember Galloway, the Ordinance was approved for first reading and reintroduction. The voice vote was unanimous. 9.B. Resolution No. 87 -367, Naming of a Park Site in Tract 3963, Griffin Homes Jerry Forde, Director of Community Services, gave a staff report. After a brief discussion, the following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 87 -367, Approving the Name of Campus Canyon Park, as presented. The voice vote was unanimous. AT THIS POINT, THE COUNCIL RECESSED; the time being 8:50 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:24 p.m. 10.A. Selection of a New Mayor Pro Tem, Due to the Resignation of a Councilmember Councilmember Brown nominated Councilmember Harper for the position of Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 5 January 21, 1987 10.A. (Continued) Mayor Pro Tem. Councilmember Harper nominated Councilmember Brown for the position. The Mayor then called for a vote on the first nomination. Councilmember Harper was elected to the position of Mayor Pro Tem on a 3 to 1 vote, with Councilmember Harper dissenting. 10.B. Consideration of Options Available to Fill the Vacant Office on the City Council Kim Leal, 844 Charles Street, addressed the Council. She felt that if the term for the vacant Council seat expired in June, a Special Election would not be a good use of public funds. City Manager Steven Kueny pointed out that an election in June would be a Special Election and that the City's next regularly scheduled election would not be held until November 1888. Michael Leal, 844 Charles Street, felt the Council should appoint someone for the entire term. He felt the City would be best served by a full City Council until such time as the November 1988 Election was held. Homer Long, 4385 Hitch Boulevard, addressed the Council stating his support of the Special Election. Kirk Memoli, 1708 Walnut Canyon Road, stated the Council should appoint someone, so they could get under way with taking care of the business at hand. He felt the voters spoke when they voted in November 1986, and that the City Council was capable of appointing someone for the unexpired term. Mr. James Keenan, 14961 Campus Drive #D, president of the College Park Neighborhood Council, stated that instead of a Special Election, an appointment should be made, naming the next highest vote - getter in the November 1986 Election for the unexpired term. Councilmember Harper said that the City Council needed to get the City back on track. He suggested that the Council encourage citizens, who are interested, to apply for the Council seat vacancy. They would submit a resume and statement of their goals and objectives, which would be distributed to the press and the City Council. Their comments could be heard at a public meeting. The applicants would be able to address the City Council and would advise them how they could best serve the City. Mayor Ferguson said that he tended to agree, since we are looking at a limited time period. The people should ultimately make the decision for the City Council, not the City Council make the decision for the people. There should be an interim appointment, he stated. Councilmember Brown stated the Council was not there to represent certain groups within the City of Moorpark, but that the Council represented all of the people, and that they would not react from pressure from a small group of people. Councilmember .Galloway stated that he was not in favor of using the election results from the November 1986 Election to determine who should be appointed Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 6 10.B. (Continued) January 21, 1987 to the interim Council seat. He further stated that he felt the City should not be looking back, but should be looking forward and favored either the application process or a vote of the people. Mayor Ferguson stated the Council needed an appointee the people would approve of. He didn't feel he could find out what the people wanted without going to election. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to call for a Special Election on June 2, 1987, and they would fill the City Council vacancy until such time as the election was held. The method of appointment would be determined at a later point. Discussion then followed. Councilmember Harper expressed his concern that the method of selection was still open. The motion was then amended as follows: MOTION TO AMEND: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to amend the original motion. The selection process was then outlined as follows: Citizens interested in filling the vacancy would, within two weeks, submit a two -page resume and a two -page statement of the goals and policies they hold for the City. This information would be made public, and the City Council would schedule a public meeting, at which time, the Council would be able to question the applicants. A news release would also be issued stating the deadline date of Friday, January 30, 1987, at 3:00 p.m. The Special Meeting was set for Tuesday, February 3, 1987, at 7:30 p.m. Each applicant would be given a maximum of ten minutes to address the Council. The voice vote on the amendment was unanimous. The original motion, as amended, was then called for question. On a voice vote, the motion was approved unanimously. 10.C. Councilmember Galloway voiced his concern with graffiti which was appearing on brick walls and sidewalks around town. Council then directed staff to return to them with a report on how a program might be funded and how other cities have been able to work with citizens within a community to take care of this problem. His second concern was regarding the Highway 118 Committee which Councilmember Harper and Councilmember Woolard had been appointed. He felt the Council should appoint another person to work with Councilmember Harper on this Committee. With the concurrence of Council, Councilmember Galloway was appointed to replace Mr. Woolard on that Committee. He also mentioned that he had asked staff to return to them with General Plan and Traffic Circulation updates and asked this be a future agenda item. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 7 January 21, 1987 10.C. 11.A. (Continued) Councilmember Brown had received a letter from the Marlborough Tract indicating there was a speeding problem in the area. She requested staff come back to Council with recommendations on this. Lt. Mike Brown, of the Sheriff's Department, responded that an enforcement program was in place in the area. This program also included the Peach Hill area. He would prepare a report and bring it back to Council on what had transpired. Councilmember Brown also mentioned 1987 was the 200th Birthday of our Constitution and that she wanted to bring this to the residents', as well as civic organizations' attention. She was encouraging all civic organizations in the area to participate in this celebration. Mayor Ferguson suggested that we might combine a celebration of our Constitution's 200th Birthday with the "Country Days" celebrations in the Fall. Upon the concurrence of the Council, Councilwoman Brown was named as the Council's representative to a committee which would be looking at the celebration of our Constitution's Birthday. Councilmember Harper was concerned with truck traffic along Peach Hill Road and suggested that perhaps a weight limitation could be placed on that area to keep trucks from traveling on that road. Staff will provide the necessary action on this matter. He also suggested that the Council direct a letter to the District Attorney's office encouraging them to complete their investigation into the possible improprieties of City officials as soon as possible. The City should offer their full cooperation and all of their resources asking the City to give any of the District Attorney's requests top priority, if they would in turn, complete their findings as soon as possible. The City Manager will be forwarding such a letter to the District Attorney's office. Rejection of Claim from A -C Construction Concerning Moorpark Road Restoration Project Mayor Ferguson stated he had contacted the City Attorney and the Fair Political Practices Commission and felt confident there was no reason why he should not participate in a decision on this claim. However, he was going to pass the gavel to the Mayor Pro Tem. Mayor Ferguson then left the dais at this point. Steven Kueny, City Manager, gave the staff report, which recommended rejection of the claim, which would limit the claim period to 120 days as opposed to one year. Councilmember Brown stated she would like to wait until we had new information on the claim. Upon a question by Councilmember Galloway whether or not we could reject the claim and still negotiate with the company, Steve Kueny responded that we could negotiate during the time we were waiting to go to court, even if Council denied the claim. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 8 January 21, 1987 11.A. (Continued) Cheryl Kane, City Attorney, responded that for 45 days from the date of the claim is filed, the claimant is prohibited from bringing up a court action. Once the 45 days has expired, they can file a claim in court. She further stated a rejection would not limit the Cniincil'a options. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to reject the claim as submitted by the staff with a provision that we open dialogue to settle out of court. On a roll call vote, the vote was unanimous with Mayor Ferguson absent. At this point, Mayor Ferguson returned to the dais. COUNCIL RECESSED AT 10:43 P.M., AND RECONVENED AT 11 :03 P.M. 11.B. Ralph M. Brown Act Requirements 1. Consideration and Direction to Staff Concerning Titles and Descriptions for the Agenda Items: Councilmember Brown asked that "Staff Recommendations" be added to the titles on the agenda face sheets. She agreed to work with staff in the preparation of the titles. The Council concurred. 2. Report from City Attorney Regarding Applicablility of the Brown Act to Ad Hoc Committees and Council's Action on this Matter: Cheryl Kane gave the staff report regarding the applicability of the Ralph M. Brown Act to Ad Hoc Committees. It was her opinion that only the City's Design Standards Committee would be subject to the Brown Act. Additionally, her report highlighted some of the inconsistencies which are found in the Brown Act. She suggested Council forward a letter to the League of California Cities, giving their support to clean up legislation, which might be proposed in the near future. The Council concurred the City should draft such a letter. 11.C. Reimbursement Agreement with Pacifica for Tierra Rejada Road Median Improvements Within Tract 2865 Steve Kueny gave a staff report.• After a brief discussion regarding irrigation for possible plantings in the sidewalk as part of the improvements. -The following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved the reimbursement agreement be approved and the Mayor be authorized to sign on behalf of the City, and also that staff be directed to continue discussions with Pardee for a similar reimbursement agreement, and keep the City Council informed on the irrigation question. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Harper, and on a roll call vote passed unanimously. 11.D. Development Application Screening Process Discussion ensued regarding whether or not a pre- screening process would add another step to the application process. It was noted developers have expressed a desire to have a packet of documents which details standards the City requires or what the City desires Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 9 January 21, 1987 11.D. (Continued) available to them. MOTION: On a motion by Councilmember Brown, seconded by Councilmember Harper, the item regarding development of an application screening process was tabled. The motion passed unanimously. 11.E. Request by the Parks and Recreation Commission and Community Services Staff to Attend the 39th Annual California Pacific Southwest Recreation and Park r__foro - -o Jerry Forde gave a staff report. After much discussion, the following motion was heard. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to continue this item to the Joint Meeting of the Parks & Recreation Commission on January 26, 1987, at 7:30 p.m. 11.F. Proposed Removal of Trees for the Traffic Signal Project Located at Princeton and Los Angeles Avenue Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer, gave a staff report. Councilmember Brown asked if there was a possibility the trees could be sold as opposed to just removed. Mr. Delzeit responded this project is being accomplished with CalTrans, who is providing $150,000. The City's portion is only $41,000 with the money having been received previously. MOTION: A motion by Councilmember Harper, seconded by Councilmember Brown, approved the awarding of the Princton Avenue signal contract to Steiny and Company in the amount of $138,550. On a roll call vote, the motion was passed unanimously. 11.H. Los Angeles Avenue Widening Project - Right -of -Way Acquisition 1. Purchase Agreement and Appropriation for Acquisition of Property from Margaret, Robert and Ronald Boles There was a brief discussion. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to approve the purchase agreement with Margaret Boles, Robert Boles and Ronald Boles to dedicate a nine -foot strip of property for a compensation of $7,000; accept a Certificate of Acceptance of Deed for right -of -way offered by the Boles; and to appropriate $7,000 from the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution Fund for the subject acquisition. On a roll call vote, the motion passed unanimously. 2. Direct the City Attorney to Proceed with Necessary Steps for Condemnation Proceedings for Acquisition of Property Owned by Gisler Mr. Delzeit gave the staff report which indicated that only one parcel is remaining. This parcel is owned by Mr. Charles Giesler. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 10 January 21, 1987 11.H. (Continued) MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to direct the City Attorney to prepare and submit a Resolution of Necessity for condemnation of a portion of the property adjacent to Los Angeles Avenue owned by Mr. Charles Giesler, and direct the City Attorney to notify the property owner that the Resolution of Necessity would be considered by the Council at the February 18, 1987 meeting. The motion on a roll call vote passed unanimously. 11.I. Consideration of Potential Impact on Highways 23 and 118 as Possible Detour Route as a Result of Improvement Work on the 101 Freeway Dennis Delzeit gave the staff report. After a brief discussion, the following motion was heard. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to authorize the Mayor to sign a letter directed to CalTrans on behalf of the City regarding potential traffic impacts on Highway 118 and 23, as a result of the widening of the Ventura Freeway, Route 101, between White Oak Avenue and Mulholland Drive, and also that this letter would be read into the record at the public hearing to be held by CalTrans January 27, 1987. The motion was approved unanimously on a voice vote. 11.J. Consideration of the Establishment of Town Hall Meetines Steven Kueny gave the staff report. After a brief discussion, staff was asked to come back with a tentative agenda and also some suggested meeting dates. This item was continued to the February 4, 1987 meeting. 11.L. Residential Development Management System - Implementation Process Associated with the Passage of Measure F - An Initiative Ordinance Pat Richards, Director of Community Development, gave the staff report. Councilmember Galloway asked for clarifications on each of the three alternative concepts presented in the staff report. Mr. Richards responded. Councilmember Harper favored a combination of alternative concepts in an effort to streamline the process. Mr. Tom Zanic, 520 Broadway, Santa Monica, then addressed the Council concerning his four areas of concern. The first area was regarding interpretations of exceptions contained in 10.02. He felt there should be as broad an interpretation as possible under Measure F. The second concern was regarding the modeling procedure, which has been used successfully in other cities and which we might borrow and adapt to our needs. His third concern was regarding how projects would be scheduled for work in 1987. His fourth concern was that, due to limited staff and the number of projects at this time, we should design a process which would do as much at one time as possible. The following motion was then heard. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 11 January 21, 1987 11.L. (Continued) MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved to direct staff to prepare a draft ordinance for implementation of Measure F, combining alternative concept numbers two and three. This draft ordinance would be brought to the City Council meeting at their March 4th meeting for review and comment. Prior to this March 4th date, however, the subject of implementation would be brought to the Joint Meeting with the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission would then start the formal hearing process. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Brown and on a voice vote passed unanimously. The Council asked staff to arrange for presentations by the Cities of Thousand Oaks and Camarillo of their models in an effort to form a workable model for the City. These presentations should be scheduled for the Joint Meeting with the Planning Commission. 12.A. Quarterly Development Status Report Concerning Pending and Approved Residential, Commercial and Industrial Projects in the City Pat Richards commented these reports would be coming on a calendar quarter in the future, with the next report due in April. The Quarterly Development Status Report was received and filed by the Council. 12.B. Report Regarding Denied Development Project Options Relating to Recent Actions Taken by the City in Association with PD -1014 (Palmer) Due to the fact that Mr. Palmer withdrew his appeal, this report was no longer needed. 12.C. Animal Control /Simi Valley Shelter - Animal Control Commission's Decision to Retain Simi Valley Shelter as Operating Holding Facility Thomas Genovese, Director of Administrative Services, gave the staff report. Mayor Ferguson asked if the Simi location was remaining open, and if it was a full - fledgled collector. It is currently operating as a holding facility, and will remain operating, as such, Mr. Genovese responded. 12.D. Bus Route Change for Moorpark /Thousand Oaks Bus Service - Extension of Bus Route to Include Peach Hill Road Thomas Genovese gave the staff report. Councilmember Brown questioned whether or not there would be another "stop" placed along the current route. Mr. Genovese responded the bus drivers will be making a review, and if more stops are needed, they will report those needs. The report was then received and filed. 13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: The following items were brought forward as future agenda items: A. Consideration of the Historical Society's request to waive CUP fees, Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 12 January 21, 1987 13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS (Continued B. Consideration of possible slope failure near the Brodsky property, C. Consideration of a letter from Mr. Crockford regarding additional legal counsel for the Building Industry Association litigation, D. General Plan updates, E. Traffic Circulation updates, F. Additional information from the Committee for the Constitution Celebration, and G. Consideration of Town Hall meetings. 14. CLOSED SESSION: The Council then adjourned at 1:11 a.m. to Closed Session to discuss Personnel matters. 15. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was reconvened at 2:46 a.m. from Closed Session. The City Manager reported personnel matters had been discussed, but no action had been taken. The meeting adjourned at 2:48 a.m. to a Joint Meeting with the Parks and Recreation Commission to be held Monday, January 26, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. CL--h- 1 1 qn'6!t- Clint Harper, Mayor