Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1987 0506 CC REGMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California May 6, 1987 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California was held on May 6, 1987 in the Council Chambers of City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:20 p.m. by Mayor Clint Harper. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Perez. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Eloise Brown, Thomas Ferguson, John Galloway, Bernardo Perez and Mayor Clint Harper. Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development; Gerald Forde, Director of Community Services; Thomas Genovese, Director of Administrative Services; Lt. Mike Brown, Sheriff's Department; Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer; and Maureen W. Wall, City Clerk. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: A. The Minutes of the Joint Meeting of the City Council and the Planning Commission held on February 25, 1987 were approved as presented on a motion by Councilmember Brown, seconded by Councilmember Galloway, and a unanimous voice vote. 5. PROCLAMATIONS. COMMENDATIONS. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: A. Certificate of Commendation - Captain _Larry "Dranny" Dransfeldt - Moorpark Fire Station No. 42. Mayor Harper presented a certificate outlining the City's appreciation to Mr. Dransfeldt who then expressed his gratitude for the certificate. B. Proclamation - May 1987; "Better Hearing and Speech Month ". The proclamation was approved as presented. No one was present to receive the proclamation. The City Clerk was directed to forward it to the requesting party. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 2 May 6, 1987 C. Special Presentation by Mr. Ed Ball of Cabot, Cabot and Forbes. Mr. Ed Ball announced that the Teledyne Laars Company will be locating in Moorpark soon. The firm manufactures energy efficient swimming pool heaters. PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Mr. Ron Funfar, 13135 East Golondrina Street, asked if the Peach Hill Park improvement item on the agenda could be heard earlier. B. Mrs. Teresa A. Cortes, 1095 Walnut Canyon Road, reminded the Council that one of the things people in the downtown area wanted was a park, and also urged the Council to complete the other park projects in the City. C. Mr. Fred Osborne, 711 Daily Drive, Camarillo, representing Merrill Lynch Realty, stated they are remodeling the building at the corner of High Street and Highway 23. It is their plan to attach burgundy awnings, paint the building a soft beige, and paint the doors burgundy with white trim. He asked the Council to approve this color scheme. Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development, stated the City established themes in 1985 which are to be followed, and additionally commented a zone clearance would be needed for the awnings. By consensus of Council the color theme and awnings were approved. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, by consensus of the Council, Item 11.A., Peach Hill Park Improvements, was heard. Councilmember Brown stepped down from the dais due to a possible conflict of interest since her home is very close to the park and its value might be affected by the development of the park. 11. STAFF REPORTS/RECOMMENDED ACTION ITEMS: A. Peach Hill Park Improvements. Further consideration and public meeting concerning proposed items to be included in Peach Hill Park. Staff's recommendation was to ask Council to give staff direction to proceed with the park improvement project. Gerald Forde, Director of Administrative Services, gave a brief overview of past staff reports on the park improvement project. 1. Ms. Ginger Stratton, 6049 Darlene Lane, stated she has been a resident of Moorpark for 27 years. She urged the Council to develop the park as proposed with lighted ball fields, restrooms, and a concession stand. 2. Mr. Steve Gaines, 13208 Quail Summit, asked the Council to eliminate the lighted ball fields. It was Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 3 May 6, 1987 his feeling that an active park could be developed without the lights. He suggested the park project be re -bid and the park development costs lowered. It was also his feeling the City could not afford the maintenance costs for the park. 3. Pat Miranda, 6526 North Amherst Street, stated an active park with lighted ball fields will be used by the community, not just the Peach Hill area residents. She asked the Council to approve the park improvement project as proposed. 4. Mrs. Anna Bell Sessler, 6061 Gabbert Road, felt if the City could afford $600,000 for a park then they should be spending more money to develop the Senior Citizens Center. 5. Ms. Nancy Sims, 13207 Peach Hill Road, lives across from the park and did not feel the lights for the ball fields were necessary. She was concerned that traffic, vandalism and trash will become problems for residents living near the park. 6. Mr. Jeff Rosen, 4365 North Ashtree, felt the development of Peach Hill Park as an active park would not take away from the development of a downtown park. He further stated the bids received for the park project seem to be in line with the estimates of $700,000. Additionally, he felt lighted ball fields were necessary at Peach Hill Park as well as the 69 -acre park site. He urged the Council to approve the project as proposed. 7. Mr. Tom Baldwin, 6475 Pepperdine, spoke as a member of the Moorpark Parks and Recreation Commission. He stated that funds for the development of Peach Hill Park would not take away from funds which might be available for the development of a downtown park. Further, the Commission, he stated, was working hard to get a downtown park. As a citizen, he felt there was not sufficient access available at the present time to the 69 -acre park site, and that this park should not be developed for some time. He urged the Council to develop the Peach Hill Park site now. 8. Ms. Barbara Gaines, 13208 Quail Summit Road, stated she is a youth law enforcement officer, and spoke concerning the need to have recreation programs for the youth of the City, but felt lighted ball fields would encourage vandalism at the park. She stated residents of the area had not been asked how they felt about lighted ball fields. Although she felt the City needed more softball and soccer fields, she felt the impacts of having lighted athletic fields, with restrooms and a concession stand at the Peach Hill Park site would be too great. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 4 May 6, 1987 9. Mr. Larry Schuman, 4838 Heather Court, felt the site should have lighted fields, and further outlined the monies which could be generated by teams using those lighted fields. He further stated an active park would afford our youth recreation alternatives. 10. Ms. Jeanne Peart, 13290 Quail Summit Road, felt traffic generated by the park would impact the area negatively. She asked the Council not to put lights at the ball fields in the park. 11. Ms. Irene Barrera, 176 Second, stated she wanted a downtown park and felt there were a several empty lots which might be developed. She further suggested that the Gisler field or the old high school site might also be good locations for a downtown park. 12. Mr. Michael Praetorius, 13532 Quail Summit Road, urged the citizens to act as a united community and build not only Peach Hill Park as proposed, but then continue on to develop all of the proposed parks within the city. 13. Mrs. Linda Todd, 4305 Northwest Cloverdale, suggested a compromise might be to lower the number of lights placed in Peach Hill Park, but urged the Council to build the park. She also stated she did not like the proposed access of Mesa Verde to the 69 -acre park site as it would draw a lot of traffic through a highly developed residential area. 14. Mr. Ron Funfar, 13135 East Golondrina Street, stated he was not in favor of an active park at the Peach Hill site. He felt lights would be a major problem especially if they were lit until late at night. 15. Ms. Peggy Barros, 13197 Golondrina Street, also spoke against lights at the Peach Hill site. It has been her experience that once people became aware of what was being developed across the street from her home, she has been unable to sell her home. 16. Ms. Marcia Shaffer, 13811 Christian Barrett Drive, presented the Council with a petition containing 97 signatures of people who were in favor of Peach Hill Park being developed as an active park. 17. Mr. Steve Miller, 382 Susan Avenue, stated he lives in the downtown area of Moorpark, but wants to see a park developed in the Peach Hill area. 18. Ms. Pearl Nuno, 447 Dorothy Avenue, stated she is an organizer for softball and soccer. She felt lights Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 5 May 6, 1987 were badly needed and the monies generated by team fees could be used to develop more athletic fields in the City. She also urged the Council to pursue the development of a park in the downtown area of the City because of its central location. 19. Ms. Connie Lawrason, 4291 Ambermeadow Street, reminded Council that this park site was ready for development over two years ago. She urged the Council to take action to develop Peach Hill Park as quickly as possible. 20. Ms. Vickie McGowan, 13648 Laurelhurst, felt Peach Hill Park should be a neighborhood park developed for the benefit of those who live in the surrounding area. Money could be saved, she felt, by developing it as a passive park. Those monies saved could then be used for the development of the 69 -acre park site. Councilmember Galloway commented it was his opinion the 69 -acre park site could be built in 1988. 21. Mr. Richard Stratton, 6049 Darlene Lane, representing AYSO Soccer, announced 322 children participated in the soccer program last year and they were expecting over 600 children to participate in 1987. There is a great need for facilities to allow all of the interested children to participate. He further commented that he did not feel that those who use the park will vandalize it. 22. Mr. Wally Todd, 4240 Tecolote Court, presented a petition from 582 people along Peach Hill Road who were in favor of an active park. The whole town needs an active park, he commented. 23. Mr. Benjamin A. Romero, 1073 Walnut Canyon Road, stated the City was in need of lighted ball fields. He also felt that the citizens who would use the park would not abuse it, but would be proud of it. It was his feeling that an active park was very necessary for our City. 24. Miss Christi Thomas, 11590 Wildflower Court, is a student in Moorpark. She urged the Council to build Peach Hill Park with lighted ball fields so those interested in participating in sports would not have to travel to the Cities of Thousand Oaks or Simi Valley to participate. 25. Mr. Harvey Plaks, 4957 Mira Sol, felt active parks were less of a law enforcement problem than passive parks. 26. Mr. Paul Cruz, 520 Moorpark Road, felt that a downtown Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 6 May 6, 1987 park was needed. He also felt the Peach Hill Park should be built as proposed as long as it would not take monies away from the development of a downtown park. 27. Ms. Patti Smith, 12686 Countrymeadow, representing the Tierra Rejada Neighborhood Council, stated she had heard overwhelming support from those speaking at the Council meeting concerning the development of an active park at the Peach Hill Park site. She urged the Council to develop not only Peach Hill Park, but also a downtown park and the 69 -acre park site. 28. Mr. David Cruz, 277 Sherman Street, stated his main interest was the children, so he would like to see lights in the park for their use. 29. Ms. Minnie Gonzalez, 269 Ruth Avenue, was opposed to having lights at Peach Hill Park. She felt lighted ball fields should be placed in the 69 -acre park site. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, Council recessed, the time being 9:37 p.m. The Council reconvened at 9:49 p.m. with Councilmember Brown absent from the dais. Councilmember Galloway thanked the public for their comments adding there was a need to look at the big picture. He further commented he could only support the site being developed as an active park if this could be accomplished without additional funds. Councilmember Perez commented that the people seemed to be uniting for park development. The development of a downtown park and the 69 -acre park site are very high priorities for the Council. He supported building the park as proposed. Councilmember Ferguson commented he would like to see more on -site parking at the park by eliminating one ball field and adding 100 parking spaces. Additionally, he favored moving ahead with the plans for the 69 -acre park site. He further suggested that there be one lighted ball field and one lighted soccer field at the Peach Hill Park site. Mayor Harper stated parks have a positive impact on many people in the community. He further stated his opposition to using Mesa Verde as an entrance to the 69 -acre park site as it was developed as a residential area. After additional discussion by the Council the following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Mayor Harper seconded a motion to proceed with the development of Peach Hill Park and to also begin a search for feasible sites for a downtown park, including the possibility of the lower fields at the Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 7 May 6, 1987 old high school site. The motion failed with Councilmember Perez and Mayor Harper voting yes, Councilmembers Ferguson and Galloway voting no, and Councilmember Brown absent. Another motion was then heard. MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Mayor Harper seconded a motion to award the contract for the development of Peach Hill Park, as per the approved design and bid, to Valleycrest Landscape in the amount of $565,079, and appropriate an amount not to exceed $22,079 in additional funds to complete the project. The motion failed with Councilmember Perez and Mayor Harper voting yes, Councilmembers Ferguson and Galloway voting no, and Councilmember Brown absent. Another motion was then heard. MOTION: Mayor Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to approve the previous motion but to additionally eliminate the stubs for future lighting to the north, re- design the parking area to allow more parking, and to eliminate some of the landscaped areas. The motion failed with Councilmember Perez and Mayor Harper voting yes, Councilmembers Ferguson and Galloway voting no, and Councilmember Brown absent. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, Council recessed, the time being 11:40 p.m. The Council reconvened with Councilmember Brown still absent. The following motion was then heard: MOTION: Councilmember Ferguson moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to approve Exhibit "A" as presented which calls for one lighted ball field (when not in use for softball, this field could be used for soccer), one unlighted soccer field, and additional trees to be planted in the area which was to previously be a half soccer field and a Little League softball field; the total contract was not to exceed $575,000; no additional parking was to be required; no stubs were to be added for future lighting; and the contract was to be awarded to Valleycrest. The motion passed with Councilmembers Perez, Ferguson and Mayor Harper voting yes, Councilmember Galloway voting no, and Councilmember Brown absent. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, Councilmember Brown returned to the dais. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Approval of Warrant Register: - Prepaid Warrants No. 4754 -4787 $21,142.83 - Payable Warrants No. 4795 -4866 $272,576.64 The Warrant Register was approved as presented on a motion made by Councilmember Ferguson, seconded by Councilmember Perez and a unanimous roll call vote. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: No Public Hearings were scheduled. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 8 a ORDINANCES /RESOLUTIONS: May 6, 1987 A. Ordinance No. 88. Regarding Zone Change No. 2812 (Burnette). A change in zone from R -1 (7000) Single Family Residential to RPD -12 Residential Planned Development (maximum 12 units per acre). By a motion made by Councilmember Perez, seconded by Councilmember Ferguson, and approved on a unanimous roll call vote, the proposed ordinance was read in title only by City Attorney Cheryl Kane, MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Ferguson seconded a motion to approve Ordinance No. 88 for first reading and introduction as read. The roll call vote was unanimous. B. Ordinance No. Regarding a revision to the sign code to allow tract pole flags and amend temporary commercial window sign coverage. This item was continued to the May 13, 1987 meeting. D. Resolution No. Renaming of Moorpark Road to Spring Street. This item was continued to the May 13, 1987 meeting. E. Resolution No. 87- . Initiating proceedings for the annual assessments for the Moorpark Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 for fiscal year commencing July 1, 1987 to June 30, 1988. This item was continued to the May 13, 1987 meeting. F. Resolution No. 87- annual assessments District No. AD -85 -1 to June 30, 1988. Initiating proceedings for the for the Parks Maintenance Assessment for fiscal year commencing July 1, 1987 This item was continued to the May 13, 1987 meeting. G. Consideration of a proposed_resolution concerning the conduct of City Council Meetings. Staff's recommendation was to adopt the resolution. This item was continued to the May 13, 1987 meeting. 10. COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS: A. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Ferguson seconded a motion to add an item to the agenda concerning the proposed County Transportation Commission, as the need arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda. The voice vote was unanimous. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 9 May 6, 1987 Councilmember Brown reported on the alternative to the current Ventura County Association of Governments' Transportation Committee. She suggested the City support the proposed commission organized with one elected official from each City in the county, with the County having five elected officials on the commission. Councilmember Brown was directed by the Council to represent the City in further discussions of this new commission. MOTION: Councilmember Ferguson moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to direct staff to forward a letter endorsing the concept of a County Transportation Commission (CTC) as an alternative to the current VCAG committee, and that the commission be composed of one elected official from each City, with the County having five officials on the commission, for the total of a fifteen member board. The voice vote was unanimous. B. By a consensus of Council, Councilmember Brown was appointed to be the City's representative on the Ventura County Association of Governments' Transportation Policy Planning Committee with Councilmember Galloway as alternate; and Councilmember Brown and Mayor Harper were appointed to attend the Economic Development Committee as representatives of the City. C. Steven Kueny reported on a meeting he and Mayor Harper attended with Supervisor Dougherty concerning the Highway 118 connector, the fire station near the Tierra Rejada bridge (which is fully funded) and the possibility of a permanent weigh station being constructed at no cost to the County. 11. STAFF REPORTS /RECOMMENDED ACTION ITEMS: B. Consider revision of Ordinance No. 33, an ordinance relating to commissions Staff's recommendation was to give staff direction in the preparation of a revised draft ordinance. 1. Mr. William E. Mason, 437 Shasta Avenue, felt the person who is elected should have the right to choose his or her appointee(s). MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to continue this item to May 13, 1987. The voice vote was unanimous. C. Tierra Rejada Road and Bridge Project. 1. Consider the approval of an agreement for possession of real property, Tierra Rejada Road, Moorpark, California. Staff's recommendation was to approve the agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign. 2. Consider awarding the Tierra Rejada Road and Bridge Project. Staff's recommendation was to award the bid. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 10 May 6, 1987 3. Consider the summary of approved expenditures and a request for additional appropriation of funds. Staff's recommendation was to appropriate funds for the project. This item was continued to May 13, 1987 by consensus of Council. ITEM 11.J. WAS HEARD AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING. 11. J. settlement a U.S. Condominium Corporation (Tracts 3070 -4 and 417U) regarding grading and building permit disputes. Staff's recommendation was to consider the proposed settlement agreement presented for approval. Steven Kueny gave an overview of the agreement pointing out minor changes which had been suggested by the City Attorney. MOTION: Councilmember Ferguson moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to approve the agreement as amended and authorized the Mayor to sign the agreement on behalf of the City. The roll call vote was unanimous. ITEM 12.D. WAS HEARD AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING. 12. D. Report concerning property located at the southwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Moorpark Avenue (Mead). Patrick Richards gave the staff report dated May 1, 1987. Councilmember Brown asked what was meant by "incremental development ". Mr. Richards responded it was a term which was referred to in the City's General Plan and generally depicted a "piece meal" approach to development. 1. Mr. Harry A. Mead, 12283 Jackson Road, Sloughhouse, California 93021, owner of the subject property, asked the City Council to allow him to develop his property. He further indicated that he did not want to continue a manufacturing and mechanics business on this site, but had not been successful in his attempts to place something else on the site. 2. Mr. John P. Fitzgerald, 1321 Port Drive, Oxnard, California 93030, of Humdinger Restaurants, stated the property owners of the 8.5 acres surrounding the subject site, are not interested in entering into an agreement to allow for an overall architectural theme for development of the area. He further stated his company is only asking for a double lane into the site and a 800 square foot building. Additionally, they were willing to fully landscape the site to the satisfaction of the City. By consensus of Council, the report was received and filed. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 11 May 6, 1987 ITEM 9.C. WAS HEARD AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING. C. Ordinance No. 89. An city -wide urgency ordinance preventing the removal or destruction of trees whose trunks are 4" or greater in diameter without prior City Council approval. Gerald Ford gave a brief staff report dated April 29, 1987. MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved, and Councilmember Ferguson seconded a motion to read the proposed ordinance in title only. The motion was approved by a unanimous roll call vote. The proposed ordinance was read in title only by City Attorney Cheryl Kane. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Ferguson seconded a motion to approve urgency Ordinance No. 89 as read. The motion was approved on a roll call vote with Councilmember Galloway voting no. Councilmember Galloway voiced his displeasure that this item was brought forth as an urgency ordinance, and that it was past midnight when the Council acted. 11. D. Downtown Plan. Consider awarding a contract with a planning consultant to create a downtown plan. Staff's recommendation was to approve the recommendation of the Public Works Committee to award the contract to the Planning Center and authorize the City Manager to sign a contract on behalf of the City. Patrick Richards gave the staff report dated April 30, 1987. There was no discussion by the Council. The following motion was heard. MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to select The Planning Center as the firm to conduct the Downtown Study in an amount not to exceed $33,150, and to authorize the City Manager to sign a contract on behalf of the City. The voice vote was unanimous with Councilmember Galloway abstaining due to the lateness of the hour that this item was heard. E. Consideration of meeting dates for a Joint Meeting between the City Council and the Parks and Recreation Commission. Staff's recommendation was to direct staff to set a meeting date and time. This item was continued to May 13, 1987. F. Consider an appeal of a denial for a time extension for the widening of New Los Angeles Avenue fronting PA -3828 (Southmark Corporation. Staff took no position on this issue. This item was continued to May 13, 1987. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 12 May 6, 1987 G. Consider a proposal to remove 50 trees in the Second, Third, Bard Streets /Sierra, Shasta Area. Staff's recommendation was to approve the contract for professional services to remove the trees. After a brief discussion by the Council concerning the possibility of encouraging citizen participation in the project, this item was continued to May 13, 1987 by consensus of Council. H. Consider adopting a resolution railroad crossings within recommendation was to direct resolution. pertaining to the maintenance of :he City's limits. Staff's the City Attorney to prepare a This item was continued to May 20, 1987 by consensus of Council. I. Consider the transfer of funds for the purchase of office equipment. Staff's recommendation was to authorize the transfer of funds for acquisition of office equipment. Thomas Genovese, Director of Administrative Services, gave the staff report dated May 1, 1987. Mayor Harper commented he would like to see the City look into the possible acquisition of a facsimile machine. By consensus, staff was directed to obtain prices on machines. The following motion was then heard: MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Ferguson seconded a motion to utilize the $1,411.05 balance in Account 01- 117 -605 (Copier), and to transfer $500 from Account 01- 117 -526 (Printing) to Account 01-117 -605 (Typewriter- Capital Expenditure). The roll call vote was unanimous. K. Proposed cooperative aqreement with the County of Ventura for transfer of streetlight energy deposits. Staff's recommendation was to approve the agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign on behalf of the City. There were no questions of staff by the Council. MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to approve the Cooperative Agreement which provides for the transfer of streetlight energy deposits for five projects (Tracts 3070 -3, 4 & 5; 3403; 3537; 3855 -1, 2, 3, 4, & 5; 3864 -1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6) which were paid prior to or during the City's first year of incorporation, and to authorize the Mayor to execute it on behalf of the City. The voice vote was unanimous. L. Consider support of Senate Bill 326 relating to the Ventura County Flood Control District. Staff's recommendation was to support Senate Bill 326. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 13 May 6, 1987 This item was continued to May 13, 1987 by consensus of Council. M. Consider a request from the Parks and Recreation Commissior concerning a 4th of July /City's Birthday Celebration. Staff's recommendation was to ask direction of the Council. Gerald Forde gave the staff report dated April 28, 1987 which outlined a celebration proposed by the Parks and Recreation Commission. These plans included a fireworks presentation to be held at the high school stadium with the Council being asked to appropriate a budget amount not to exceed $15,000. Councilmember Galloway felt the requested budget amount was too high. Councilmember Brown agreed stating a nice birthday celebration and 4th of July celebration could be planned without the high price tag. MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to not approve the appropriation requested by the Parks and Recreation Commission for the City's Birthday /4th of July Celebration. The voice vote was unanimous. Councilmember Brown commented she would work with the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Bicentennial Committee to address the issue of fiscal responsibility. N. Consideration of In -House City Engineer. Staff's recommendation was to defer action on this item to May 20, 1987. By consensus of Council, this item was continued to May 20, 1987. 12. STAFF REPORTS /INFORMATION ITEMS: A. A report concerning the traffic signal warrant study at the intersection of Moorpark Avenue and Poindexter Avenue /First Street. This item was continued to May 13, 1987. B. Annual Infrastructure Report. This item was continued to May 20, 1987. C. Report concerning the relocation of olive trees along Los Angeles Avenue. This report, dated April 24, 1987, was received and filed by the Council. D. Report concerning property located at the southwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Moorpark Avenue (Mead). This report was received and filed. E. Report concerning the widening of Highway 118 through the Virginia Colony Area. This item was continued to May 13, 1987. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 14 May 6, 1987 13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: The following items of concern were brought forth as future agenda items: the 69 -acre park site, Highway 118 lobbying efforts, and consideration of proposed assembly bills relating to district elections. 14. CLOSED SESSION: Cheryl Kane informed the Council the court had granted an early possession concerning the Boething litigation. She recommended that this item be added to the agenda, since the need to take action arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda. The following motion was then heard: MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Ferguson seconded a motion to add a Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (a) to the agenda concerning the Boething litigation, as the need to take action arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda. The voice vote was unanimous. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to adjourn to Closed Session. The voice vote was unanimous, the time being 2:17 a.m. A. Litigation concerning A -C Construction. B. Personnel Session. This was not discussed, but continued to May 13, 1987. 15. ADJOURNMENT: The full City Council reconvened in Open Session at 2:56 a.m. No action was taken during the Closed Sessions. MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting to May 13, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. The voice vote was unanimous. The time was 2:58 a.m. COIT D • H a,-ral Clint D. Harper, Ph.D. Mayor ATTEST: