HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1988 0125 CC ADJMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Moorpark, California January 25, 1988
The adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of
Moorpark, California was held on January 25, 1988 in the
Council Chambers of City Hall of said City located at 799
Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 6:50 p.m. by Mayor
John Galloway.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember
Brown.
3. ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmembers Eloise Brown, Clint Harper,
and Mayor John Galloway.
Absent: Councilmember Lane
Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Patrick
Richards, Director of Community Development;
Michael Rubin, Senior Planner; and Dennis
Delzeit, City Engineer.
4. PROCLAMATIONS. COMMENDATIONS, AND SPECIAL
PRESENTATIONS•
None were presented.
5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
No changes were made.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS
A. Paul Coyle, 15750 Los Angeles Avenue, #151,
stated he thought tonight's meeting was to only
include the public hearing concerning the land
use and circulation element updates and secondly
inquired as to when he might be receiving a
response to a letter he presented to Council at
the January 20, 1988 meeting.
B. Roger Beaulieu, 14792 E. Stanford Street, stated
that as he was walking precincts for the upcoming
February election, and has found that most
citizens are opposed to Councilmanic Districts.
In addition, he felt that the alignment of
highway 118 through the Virginia Colony area had
been studied proficiently and that now was the
time to begin work on the project.
C. Ethel Sulkis, 270 Sierra Avenue, thanked the City
Council for the tree removal project and stated
she is looking forward to the completion of the
curbs and gutters in the area in which trees were
removed.
D. Jocelyn Reed, 10851 Citrus Drive, spoke
concerning Ordinance No. 89, the City's Urgency
Tree Preservation Ordinance, and asked the
Council to consider inserting into the ordinance
measures which would protect the City's heritage
trees. Additionally, she felt that the
enforcement section of the ordinance should be
tightened.
Councilmember Harper commented he agreed with
Mr. Beaulieu that Councilmanic Districts would
be divisive to the City and additionally felt
it was time that the highway 118 realignment
project through the Virginia Colony area was
begun. Councilmember Brown commented she would
like to see something concerning our heritage
trees addressed in our Tree Preservation
Ordinance. Mayor Galloway noted that the
additional action items which were not completed
at the January 20 meeting were indeed carried
over to tonight's meeting but had been previously
noticed.
7. COMMITTEE REPORTS
Councilmember Harper presented a report concerning the
Ad Hoc Truck Inspection Station Committee. He
highlighted the events of their conversations with Mr.
Earl Rogers of Caltrans in his report dated January
25, 1988. Overall, Caltrans appears to be receptive
of the idea of the City's establishing a weight and
inspection station site within the City limits, and
further suggested some ways to accomplish that project
in an expedient manner. Although the City could not
hope for a station as large as the one which is on the
Conejo Grade, it could perhaps have a weigh station
on either side of Highway 118 which would provide a
pit scale and small office area.
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
Nothing was presented on the consent calendar.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
C. Update to the City's Land Use and Circulation
Elements. Consider the Planning Commission's
recommendation and set matters for future
discussion.
Patrick Richards, Director of Community
Development, gave an overview of the staff report
dated January 14, 1988. It is the Planning
Commission's recommendation that the circulation
update precede the land use consideration. Staff
is recommending that no letters of interest be
considered which occur North of Los Angeles
Avenue. This is due to the time frame the City
wanted to keep which would be significantly
lengthened if all of the projects North of Los
Angeles were considered. The duly noticed pubic
hearing was then opened after brief Council
discussion.
C -1. Jim Scaroni, 5740 W. Greentree, Somis. Mr.
Scaroni owns approximately two acres of land on
Walnut Canyon and Everett Street on which eh
would like to construct a garden -type office
building. He reiterated his interest in a zone
change under the current Land Use and Circulation
Updates. Councilmember Harper responded he was
a little concerned we would be overloading the
City on this type of use in light of the recent
approval of the Topa Management Project on the
corner of New Los Angeles Avenue and Spring Road.
C -2. John Newton, 165 High Street, Suite 204, stated
he was representing five different components of
the update. He indicated he had addressed
letters of interest for five different property
owners. They are: Mr. and Mrs. Charles Gisler,
Mr. Fred Kavli, JBR Development Company, Grace
Chandler Estates Trust, and Steven Anderson. He
further stated he felt the Council should
consider the land use element along with the
circulation element.
C -3. Jocelyn Reed, 10851 Citrus Drive, spoke
concerning the recreation chapter of the land use
element. She asked Council to insure that the
bike and trails system would be continued within
the City and would like to see the City's policy
concerning these trails strengthened by
clarifying them and making the trails more
specific in the plan.
C -4. Connie Lawrason, 4291 Ambermeadow Street, felt
that the following items were of great importance
to the City: traffic circulation, a hillside
preservation ordinance similar to that used in
the City of Thousand Oaks, open spaces within the
City, zoning for a hospital or emergency center,
also zoning for a hotel with perhaps a dinner
house that contained banquet facilities,
consideration of Senior and low income housing,
consideration of Mobile Home Parks, as well as
attention to passive and active parks, planned
communities, annexation of nearby county land
into into the City, and consideration of an
entertainment center which might contain an open
air theatre as well as a walk -in theatre. The
public hearing was closed when no one else wished
to speak.
Mayor Galloway commented he would like to see the
major changes suggested in the General Plan Update
voted upon by the people. Councilmember Brown felt
the City should also consider the County's General
Plan Update since this could directly affect our
circulation element. Mayor Galloway further commented
that he would like to see alternatives to an East -West
line of travel north of Los Angeles Avenue as well as
an additional north -south line of travel other than
Walnut Canyon Road. Additionally, he expressed some
concerns that the City was not allowing for open
space. Councilmember Harper agreed with staff's
recommendation to set a meeting to hear the land use
changes being proposed and then limit the scope of
work at that time.
He also indicated he would be in favor of the City
Attorney reviewing ramifications of an ordinance which
would affect projects over fifty acres going to a vote
of the people. Mayor Galloway suggested that rather
than be based on size, that a project be presented to
a vote of the people when it reached a certain ratio
to the City's population. Councilmember Brown was not
in favor of limiting the Council's review to the
fourteen letters of interest which had been presented
but rather would look at all letters of interest
presented as well as other projects which staff was
aware of. Councilmember Harper also suggested that
before final action on the scope of the request for
proposal was taken, the Council wait for the fifth
Councilmember to be seated. The following motion was
then heard:
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown
seconded a motion to set February 17, 1988 as the meeting
to consider the merits of the seventeen requested specific
land use changes or others as known by staff in relation
to the City's guidelines for the screening of General Plan
amendments and any potential staff initiated changes, and
to direct that the City Attorney review all ramifications
of the City's adopting an ordinance which would place all
projects over fifty acres to a vote of the people, and to
direct staff to begin work on a local planning ordinance
and to delay final action on the scope of the request for
proposal until the fifth Council person is seated, and to
direct City staff to present City Council with proposed
weigh station sites. The voice vote was unanimous with
Councilmember Lane absent.
AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, the Council recessed, the time
being 8:45 p.m. At 9:05 p.m., the Council reconvened with
Councilmember Lane absent.
10. COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS
Councilmember Brown remarked she would like to see a
response to Mr. John Newton's letter concerning a
proposed affordable housing committee on the next
agenda so that the Council could consider an
appropriate reply to his letter.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember
Harper seconded a motion to consider only
discussion action items 11.F and 11.I with all
other items on the agenda to be continued to the
Council meeting of February 3, 1988. The voice
vote was unanimous with Councilmember Lane
absent.
11. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS
F. Consider the existing and proposed sidewalk locations
along High Street. Staff recommended they be directed
as deemed appropriate.
Dennis Delzeit gave an overview of the staff report
dated January 11, 1988. Council was concerned if
sufficient funds were available, the sidewalk area in
front of Schleve's project, PD -1040, might also
receive consideration. Councilmember harper commented
that he was concerned the City have a streetscape plan
and would like to see staff's recommendation along
this line. Steven Kueny mentioned that the matching
funds for the SB821 funds available had been budgeted.
In response to the Council's concerns regarding
bollards, Mr. Kueny suggested that bollards could be
constructed in front of that parcel as an interim
measure until such time as sidewalks could be
constructed. Additionally, bollards could be placed
in front of the parts store on High Street so that
cars could park parallel in front of the business.
The following motion was heard.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown
seconded a motion to direct staff to construct a sidewalk
along the north side of High Street between Magnolia Avenue
and Spring Street. In addition to this recommendation,
staff was directed to construct a sidewalk along the north
side of High Street between Magnolia Avenue and Bard Avenue
if funds were available, and if funds were not available
to complete both of these items, staff is directed to
construct a sidewalk along the north side of High Street
between Magnolia Avenue and spring road as well as place
bollards along the north side of High Street between
Magnolia Avenue and Bard Avenue. Lastly, Staff was
directed to begin preliminary engineering along with a
field survey of the proposed sidewalk layout while the
Downtown Study is in the process of being finalized, which
will include a preliminary cost estimate with attention
also being given to the second area west of Magnolia. The
voice vote was unanimous with Councilmember Lane absent.
I. Consider ioarticiiDation in the Federal Aid to Urban
FAU Pro Iram. Staff recommendation was to authorize
the City Engineer to prepare the necessary
documentation for participation.
Steven Kueny, City Manager gave an overview of the
staff report dated January 15, 1988. There was no
discussion by Council. the following motion was
heard.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper
seconded a motion to authorize the City Engineer to proceed
with the process to have Moorpark eligible for the FAU
Program at a cost not to exceed $2,100. The voice vote was
unanimous, with Councilmember Lane absent.
12.
13.
ORDINANCES
No ordinances were presented for Council
consideration.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
The only future agenda item mentioned was a response
to Mr. Newton's letter concerning the possibility of
the formation of an affordable housing committee.
14. CLOSED SESSION
City Manager Steven Kueny announced there was no need
to hold the closed session at this time.
15. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown
seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The voice
vote was unanimous, the time of adjournment was 9:20
p.m.
Mayor
ATTEST: