Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1988 0504 CC REGMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California May 4, 1.988 The regular meeting of the City Council held on May 4, 1988, in the Council Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: of the City of Moorpark, California was Chambers of City Hall located at 799 The meeting was called to order at 7:12 p.m. by Mayor John Patrick Lane. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Harper. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Eloise Brown, John Galloway, Clint Harper, Bernardo Perez and Mayor John Patrick Lane. Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development; Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer; Lt. Mike Brown, Sheriff's Department; Stan Raap, Fire Department; Philip Newhouse, Director of Community ServicAs; Thomas P. Genovese, Deputy City Manager; and Maureen W. Wall, City Clerk. 4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: A. Special proclamation declari_�R_ National C_1_e_an Air Week, _May._2, through 8, 1988, in the City of Moorark. Mayor Lane presented the special proclamation to Mr. Rob Blanche. B. Presentation of the Area Housing Authority's Annual _Report by Carolyn G. Briggs, Executive Director. Ms. Briggs gave an overview of the services the housing authority had to offer, and an overview of their 1988 Annual Report. 5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS_TO,__THE AGENDA: MOTION: Mayor Lane moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to add an item to the agenda concerning West Meadows Park and the picnic shelter, the one point of ingress /egress, and maintenance concerns in the event of a 10 -year flood which would put the park under 14 feet of water, since the need to take action arose subsequent to the posting of Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California _ _ 2 the agenda. The voice vote was unanimous 11.I. on the agenda. 1: � I�I�I7uIyi�]i��►� May 4, 1988 The matter became Item A. Ms. Linda Symchak, 13647 Blacksmith, Secretary of Marlborough Homeowners' Association, urged the Council to set June 1, 1988 as the Public Hearing regarding the Laurelhurst Road easement vacation. B. Ms. Ruth Farabaugh, 13543 East Cedarpine, stated she supported the General Plan as is, and felt the Council should only make changes in it when there was a compelling reason to do so. C. Ms. Elaine L. Freeman, 24005 Ventura Blvd., Calabasas, representing Griffin Homes, gave a brief overview of the changes they wanted to make in RPD -1041. She also offered to deposit with the City an amount of $1 per square foot for a total of $50,000 for the Delfen traffic signal, and if the entire amount were not used for construction of the signal, then the unused portion would be refunded to Griffin Homes. D. Mr. Mike Upton, 4202 Granadilla, suggested the City not place speed humps on Laurel Glen, but create a cul -de -sac instead. E. Mr. David L. Fowler, 4272 Laurel Glen Drive, suggested the City construct a barrier on Will-jams Ranch Road at the power lines. F. Mr. Ed Wheelis, 14092 Hargrove Court, spoke concerning the Carlsberg Public Hearing since he was not going to be able to stay for that item. He felt the area should be a greenbelt. G. Mr. Edward Alberts, 4007 Weeping Willow, thanked Embassy for cutting down the grass at their site. He also thanked citizens Pat Basso, Sally Slinkard, and Beverly Harris for their community concern and hard work. H. Mr. Tom Zanic, 520 Broadway, Suite 100, Santa Monica, representing Urban West Communities, asked the Council to approve Items 11.E. (realignment of Tierra Rejada Road) and 11.F. (elevation adjustments to Tract No. 4338). He further stated he would be present to answer any questions Council might have of him. I. Mr. Ray Stumermann, 4206 Peach Slope, stated he lived at the corner of Peach Slope and Williams Ranch Road, and felt a cul -de -sac should be created at the Southern California Edison easement. J. Mr. Tom Thompson, 12623 Hillside Drive, felt Williams Ranch Road should be ended at the Edison easement. He asked the Council to not place speed humps on Laurel Glen Drive. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 3 _ .._._______ May 4, 1988 K. Mr. Steve Halverson, 4273 Peach Slope Road, stated he was opposed to speed humps on Laurel Glen. He urged the Council to create a cul -de -sac on Williams Ranch Road at the Edison easement. L. Mr. Gregory Barker, 12453 Hillside Drive, stated he was in favor of the lowering of the grades (lot elevations) in Tract No. 4338. M. Mr. Larry Ackermann, 4236 Laurel Glen Drive, stated he was not in favor of a cul -de -sac or a gate on Williams Ranch Road at the Edison easement. N. Mr. Howard Yaras, 4248 Laurel Glen Drive, Buttercreek I Homeowners' Association President, stated they were opposed to speed humps on Laurel Glen. They asked the Council to place a cul -de -sac on Williams Ranch Road at the Edison easement. 0. Mr. Neal R. Garrett, 12900 Williams Ranch Road, stated Williams Ranch Road was heavily travelled. He was in favor of a cul -de -sac on Williams Ranch Road at the Edison easement. P. Mr. Ken Hahn, 4216 Laurel Glen Drive, thanked the City Council for the stop signs in an effort to better control traffic, but stated he would like to see a cul -de -sac at Williams Ranch Road and the Edison easement with a gate for emergency access. Q. Mr. Joseph Vallino, 12610 Hillside Drive, commented the Environmental Impact Report for PC -3 identified Laurel Glen and Hillside as major collectors. He felt the Council should re- evaluate the situation. R. Mr. William E. Mason, 437 Shasta Avenue, stated industrial and commercial buildings were going up to the west of his home. He asked the City Council not to allow businesses to come into this area that might create obnoxious smells or present health hazards. He also urged the Council to continue mailing notices concerning the assessment districts. S. Ms. Mary Gayle, 350 North Lantana, Camarillo, legal counsel for Pardee Construction, asked the City Council to make maintenance of their drainage improvements a part of an assessment district. T. Mr. Theodore J. Cullen, 1.0880 Wilshire Blvd., #1400, Los Angeles, engineer for Pardee Construction, gave an overview of the drainage improvements for which they would like the City to assume responsibility. U. Ms. Pat Best, 12675 Williams Ranch Road, stated she would like to see a cul -de -sac at the Edison easement on Williams Ranch Road. V. Mr. Steve Brodsky, 4572 Vista Del Valle, spoke concerning the Carlsberg Public Hearing since he had to return to work and could not remain for the item. He was not in favor of this area Minutes of the City Council Moorpark California ---..-4 _._ ._.._.__ May 4, 1988 being developed as densely as proposed. He thought a buffer might be created at Tierra Rejada Road and Spring Road. 7 E:3 Councilmember Harper stated he was in favor of a cul -de -sac being created on Williams Ranch Road at the Southern California Edison easement as suggested by the citizens who spoke. Mayor Lane commented he would also like to see this done with a gate which could be opened in the event of an emergency COMMITTEE REPORTS: Councilmember Brown briefly outlined the Animal Regulation Commission Meeting, Senior Citizen May Meeting, and the VCAG Executive Meeting which she had attended. CONSENT CALENDAR: Items 8.0 -6., 8.E., 8.F., 8.G., 8.H.9 8.I., 8.K., 8.N. and 8.Q. were pulled for individual consideration by the Council. A. Approval of Warrant Register: - Prepaid Warrants Nos. 6675 -6707, 6709 -6718 $137,909.67 - Payable Warrants Nos. 6728 -6783 $282,927.49 B. Consider an informational report regarding a Special Use Permit for a 5 -K Run sponsored by Valenza Realty. Staff recommended Council receive and file this report. C. Consider Citv Manager - Approved Contract Summaries: 1. Jetoc Construction - Peach Hill Park drain 2. Dial Services - Alarm at new City Hall facility 3. Munimetrix, Inc. - Software purchase 4. Moorpark News - Summer brochure publication 5. Kirk D. Aiken - Rental of 33 High Street, June 1988 Staff recommended the contract summaries be received and filed. D. Consider an award of contract for continued contractual services for temporary accounting services. Staff recommended Council authorize the Mayor to execute the necessary agreement on behalf of the City. J. Consider an adjustment in the landscape maintenance easements in Tract No. 2865 -3 (Pardee Construction). Staff recommended Council accept the revised landscape planting and maintenance easement, accept the Quitclaim of the original landscape planting and maintenance easement, and authorize the City Clerk to execute the necessary documents on behalf of the City. L. Consider an field surve Streets. report. al report concerning a for the repair taff recommended uest to do a a drainage at Bard and Charles Council receive and file this Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 5 _ _ M 4, 1988 M. Consider a release and waiver concerning payment of Park Land Dedication In -Lieu Fees _CCharles Street Limited). Staff recommended Council approve the agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement on behalf of the City. 0. Consideration of a Community_ Development Block Grant (CDBG) contract between the County of-Ventura and the City of Moorpark -- Entitlement Program 1986/87_ and 1987/88. Staff recommended Council approve the contract subject to the City Attorney and the City Manager approvals of final language, and authorize the City Manager to sign the contract on behalf of the City. P. income housing project with Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation and the City of_Moorpark. Staff recommended Council approve the contract and authorize the City Manager to sign the contract on behalf of the City. Consider a report regarding the public review period of the Draft Environmental Impact__Report -- Hazardous Waste /Materials Management Plan (Tanner _Plan). Staff recommended Council receive and file this report. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to approve Consent Calendar Items 8.A., 8.B., 8.0 -1. to 8.0 -5., 8.D., 8.J., 8.L., 8.M., 8.0., 8.P. and 8.R. as recommended by staff. The roll call vote was unanimous with Councilmember Perez stating he abstained on the votes for Items 8.0. and 8.P. due to a conflict of interest. C. Consider City Manager-Approved_ Contract Summaries: 6. Safety Stripe - Peach Hill parking lot Councilmember Galloway asked why this was not included as a part of the park's construction costs. Steven Kueny responded this was not an additional appropriation of funds. MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to receive and file the contract summary. The voice vote was unanimous. Consider a request to set a Public Hearing regarding a Laurelhurst Road easement vacation. Staff recommended Council set June 1, 1988 as the Public Hearing date. Councilmember Galloway asked whether or not this would affect ingress to the park. Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development, stated it would not. MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to set June 1, 1988 as the Public Hearing date for the Laurelhurst Road easement vacation. The voice vote was unanimous. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 6 May 4, 1988 F. Consider a staff report regarding the need to amend the City's Zoning Code to regulate political signs. Staff recommended Council adopt Resolution No. 88 -467 instructing staff to accomplish a revision to the City's sign code. Councilmember Brown asked why Section 3 of the resolution mentioned the Design Standards Committee was to review the need for political sign regulations, since the need had already been determined by the Council. Patrick Richards responded this was intended as a courtesy to the Design Standards Committee. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to direct the Planning Commission to proceed with the formal action. AMENDMENT TO THE MAIN MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 88 -467, a resolution initiating proceedings to consider amending the zoning ordinance and the Moorpark Municipal Code pertaining to political sign requirements, and that Section 3 of the resolution be removed. The voice vote was unanimous. The main motion, as amended, was approved. G. Consider a report from staff regarding the need to identify existing non - conforming uses _inall zones. Staff recommended Council direct staff to conduct a survey of non - conforming uses throughout the City with a report back to Council. Councilmember Brown asked if this survey had anything to do with the General Plan Update. Patrick Richards responded it did not. These were just non - conforming uses which have come to staff's attention and need to be abated. The abatement is a long process which staff would like to begin now. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to direct staff to begin this process now, but not at the expense of completion of the General Plan Update. The voice vote was unanimous. H. Resolution No. 88-468.-----A - resolution_ concerning a limited "No Parking Zone" along the north side of Route 118 between Park Land and Shasta Street. Staff recommended adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Galloway stated he was not in favor of this resolution. It was his intent to shorten the "Red Zone" along Route 118, not lengthen it. Councilmember Harper expressed his support of the resolution. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Mayor Lane seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 88 -468, a resolution authorizing the establishment of a "No Parking Any Time" zone on Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California _ 7 May 4, 1988 Route 118, northerly side, from Park Lane to Shasta Street. The motion was approved with Councilmembers Brown and Galloway voting no. I. Resolution No. 88 -469. A resolution concerning a limited "No Parking" zone along the north side of Route 118 between Maureen Lane and Buttercreek Road. Staff recommended Council adopt the resolution. Councilmember Galloway commented he saw no reason why this area could not be used as a parking area. Councilmember Brown felt that if further parking restrictions were placed along Route 118 in this area, trucker's would begin parking along the residential streets in the area. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 88 -469, a resolution authorizing the establishment of a "No Parking, 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m." zone on Route 118, northerly side, from Maureen Lane to Buttercreek Road. The voice vote was unanimous. K. Consider the award of the maintenance contract for Peach Hill Park. Staff recommended Council award the contract to California Landscape Maintenance. Councilmember Brown asked for verification of the $2,425 cost estimate for park maintenance. Philip Newhouse, Director of Community Services, responded the initial cost estimate had been high, and that the $2,425 cost was correct. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to approve the award of contract for Peach Hill Park to California Landscape Maintenance. The voice vote was unanimous. N. Consider a purchase_____agrgement for Los_ Angeles Avenue Right -of -Way (Gisler). Staff recommended Council approve the agreement and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement on behalf of the City. Steven Kueny, City Manager, asked the Council to authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement after he and the City Attorney make minor revisions in the final language. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to approve the agreement subject to minor revisions in the language and authorize the Mayor to sign the amended agreement on behalf of the City. The voice vote was unanimous. Q. Further consideration of cost estimates for Highway 118 improvements through the_ _Vir__ginia Colony Area. Staff recommended Council appropriate $11,000 from the Los Angeles Avenue AOC and authorize the work to be done. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California ..... -.8 — May 4, 1988 Steven Kueny suggested an aerial survey also be done as it would give more information necessary for the preparation of documents specifying improvements to be made. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to appropriate $11,000 from the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution and authorize the design survey work; direct the City Engineer to submit an appropriate work authorization to the City Manager for the referenced design survey work; and authorize aerial survey work at a cost of $5,000. The motion was approved with Councilmembers Brown and Galloway voting no. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, the Council recessed, the time being 8:55 p.m. At 9:15 p.m., the full Council reconvened. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Processing Review of the Carlsberg Specific Plan (Moorpark Highlands). Consider_ a report_regarding the possible process.i1M options available.' Staff recommended Council direct staff as deemed appropriate. No staff report was given. The duly noticed Public Hearing was opened. A -1. Mr. Ron Tankersley, 2800 28th Street, Santa Monica, representing Carlsberg Financial Corporation, asked that the planning process for their specific plan proceed. A -2. Ms. Linda Symchak, 13647 Blacksmith Court, supported Carlsberg being developed in a reasonable manner. A -3. Mr. Ed Wheelis, 14092 Hargrove Court, wanted the project to stay low density as zoned. A -4. Mr. Edward Alberts, 4007 Weeping Willow, asked that the City Council only allow low density development in this area. A -5. Ms. Marjorie Blye, 4122 Oakcliff Drive, stated if the site is developed, she would be in favor of eliminating the apartments and commercial area proposed. A -6. Ms. Sally Slanker, 13763 Gunsmoke Road, was not in favor of high density development for this site. She presented a letter signed by more than 700 people which showed opposition to the zoning proposed by the specific plan submitted by Carlsberg. A -7. Ms. Pat Basso, 3940 Southhampton Road, asked the City Council to remove the apartments and commercial area from the project, and from the Environmental Impact Report. A -8. Mr. Greg Burkhardt, 3932 Southhampton Road, stated he was opposed to the high density development. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California _ _ .._9 May 4, 1988 A -9. Ms. Karol Burkhardt, 3932 Southhampton Road, did not feel the developers should be able to bring a plan to the City Council which does not match the site's current land use. She asked the City Council not to go ahead with the EIR currently being proposed. She also asked the Council to not allow anything to be built on the hills. A -10. Ms. Linda Jarvis, 4170 North Cedarpine, spoke against high density development. A -11. Mr. Eugene Frenzel, 13661 Deering Lane, stated he was opposed to the apartments and commercial areas being proposed, but would rather have the single family homes constructed as zoned. A -12. Mrs. Beverly Harris, 13893 Christian Barrett, President of Steeple Hill Homeowners' Association, stated they were opposed to changing the zoning from low to high and very high density. They felt to make such a change would add traffic problems and degrade air quality further. Since it was inconsistent with the General Plan, they were asking the Council to deny the project. A -13. Ms. Rosemary Lannom, 3907 Hatfield, stated she supported the General Plan which shows this site as low density. A -14. Ms.Katherine Dwyhalo, 13771 Gunsmoke Road, stated she was not supportive of high density development in this area. A -15. Mr. Peter Swift, 13748 Gunsmoke Road, stated he felt there was a need for balance between a reasonable return for the investors, and the concerns of the citizens. A -16. Ms. Janet Sock, 13746 Donnybrook Lane, did not support high density development in the area. A -17. Ms. Laura Gutierrez, 4027 Blairwood Drive, stated she was not in favor of high density development. A -18. Mr. Allen Camp, One Boardwalk, Suite 102, Thousand Oaks, legal counsel for Carlsberg Financial, stated the original plan for the preparation of the specific plan was given unanimous approval by the Planning Commission and the City Council. He urged the City Council to not ignore the rights of the land owner. They were not asking for approval of the project at this time, only that the specific plan process be allowed to proceed. The EIR, which would include cumulative traffic concerns, should be done. They also wanted their specific plan to be separated from the General Plan Update process. The Public Hearing was closed when no one else wished to speak. MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to adjourn to Closed Session to discuss potential litigation under Government Code Section Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 10 54956.9(b)(1). The voice vote was unanimous 10:47 p.m. - - -_- - May 4, 1988 The time was At 11:32 p.m., the full Council reconvened in Open Session. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to continue this item to May 25, 1988; and to direct staff to work with the applicant taking into account concerns of staff, residents and the City Council and to come back with a revised proposal. The voice vote was unanimous. B. Planned Development Permit No. 1062 -- Major Modification No. 1 (Embassy Plaza). A request- to add an additional 7,886 square foot free - standing building on the subject site located on the northwest corner of Spring Road and Tierra Rejada Road. Staff recommended Council approve the modification with conditions. The Planning Commission recommended Council deny the application. Staff noted the applicant had asked the matter be continued to June 15, 1988. The duly noticed Public Hearing was opened. B -1. Mr. Ed Wheelis, 14092 Hargrove Court, stated it appeared the restaurant area was being divided up into small stores, and wondered if the developer was having a hard time getting tenants. He was opposed to the modification. Dividing the area into smaller stores would add additional noise to the area in his opinion. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to continue the Public Hearing to June 15, 1988. The voice vote was unanimous. C. Ordinance No. 51 -- Mobile Home Park Rents. __A report regarding possible revisions to Ordinance No. 51. Staff recommended Council continue this matter to the May 18, 1988 meeting. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to continue this matter to May 18, 1988. The voice vote was unanimous. D. Draft Downtown Plan. A_report regarding the scope of work accomplished in relation to the limits of the contract. Staff recommended Council continue this matter to May 18, 1988. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to continue this matter to May 18, 1988. The voice vote was unanimous. 10. COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS: Councilmember Perez commented he would like to see the City give thought to where individuals displaced due to code enforcement Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 11 _ _ _ _ May 4, 1988 activities might be lights at Peach Hill on. relocated. Councilmember Brown suggested the Park be placed on timers to avoid their being left 11. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS: A. Further consideration of requested speed humps on Laurel Glen Drive and Hillside Drive. Staff recommended Council direct staff as deemed appropriate. Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer, gave a brief overview of the traffic problem and the options available. Stan Raap, Fire Department, stated it was policy that 800 feet be allowed at a dead end street. This is intended to allow emergency service vehicles in and out of the area. Councilmember Galloway suggested the citizen recommendations be reviewed by the City Engineer, the fire department and the police department to determine the best resolution for the problem. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to direct staff to come up with a temporary measure and landscape at the existing William Ranch Road terminus at the Southern California Edison Easement, with a report back with cost estimates and the recommended appropriation of funds. The voice vote was unanimous. B. Reconsideration of a Minor_ Modification to RDP-1041 (Griffin Homes) to allow an increase i_n__.square_footage for approved floor plans. Staff recommended Council direct staff as deemed appropriate. Councilmember Brown suggested the Council accept the $50,000 deposit offer from Griffin Homes, with the understanding funds not used for the signal would be returned to Griffin Homes. Staff should be directed to process the modification to the project upon receipt of written concurrence of this arrangement. The Rules of Procedure were suspended to allow Griffin Homes representative, Elaine Freemen, to address the Council. B -1. Ms. Elaine Freeman stated they were agreeable to the deposit, if it could be made in late July or early August. They would submit a draft document which would allow the deposit at the time the contract is let for the signal. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to accept the offer by Griffin Homes to assist with the Delfen Traffic Signal Project, with an agreement to be returned and the deposit made when the contract for the signal is let, with the provision that should the signal not be installed, the deposit would be returned to Griffin Homes. The voice vote was unanimous. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 12 _.- __ _____ May 4, 1988 C. Consider a request from a citizen to consider_ the creation of a "Land Bank" within the City__ of Moorpark. Staff recommended Council direct staff as deemed appropriate. This item was continued to May 11, 1988. D. Consider the acceptance of off-street drainage improvements in Tract No. 2865 -3 (Pardee Construction). Staff recommended Council direct staff as deemed appropriate. This item was continued to May 11, 1988. E. Consider the realignment of Tierra Rejada Road between Spring Road and Moorpark Road (south) (Urban West Communities - West Village Condition). Staff recommended Council direct staff as deemed appropriate. This item was continued to May 11, 1988. F. Consider making elevation adjustments to Tract No. 4338 (Urban West Communities) to allow a lowering of elevations from the approved tentative map. Staff recommended Council approve the lowering of the elevations. This item was continued to May 11, 1988. G. Consider the adoption of certain amendments to the Council's Rules of Procedure relating to the length of meetings_. Staff recommended Council adopt the modifications to the Rules of Procedure until further action is taken by the Council. This item was continued to May 11, 1988. H. Consider a report concerning costs associated_ with first class mailings for the two assessment districts. Staff recommended Council discontinue the practice of assessment district mailings and direct the City Clerk to publish and post assessment district notices. This item was continued to May 11, 1988. I. Reconsideration of Council's action_concerniny the West Meadows Park. Steven Kueny, City Manager, recommended Council rescind their previous action and direct staff to review the maintenance issues. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to reconsider action taken concerning the Peach Hill Watercourse and the West Meadows Park in view of new information received. The voice vote was unanimous. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California __13 _ _ May 4, 1988 MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to refer the matter to the Public Works Committee for their review and recommendation(s). The voice vote was unanimous. 12. ORDINANCES: None were presented for consideration. 13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: The following were directed by Council to be placed on future agenda(s): request to go out to bid on the Delfen Traffic Signal, consider marking the intersection of Christian Barrett and Spring Road with "Keep Clear" markings, and a report concerning the condition of the roadway on Williams Ranch Road where drainage work was done. 14. CLOSED SESSION: A. Personnel. B. Litigation concerning Urban West Communities versus the City of MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to add a Closed Session item concerning A -C Construction versus the City of Moorpark, since a need to take action arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda. The voice vote was unanimous. The matter became Item 14.G. on the agenda. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to go into Closed Session to discuss those items listed. The voice vote was unanimous. The time of adjournment was 12:07 a.m. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, the Council recessed, the time being 12:08 a.m. At 12:12 a.m., the full Council reconvened and went into Closed Session. Steven Kueny, Cheryl Kane, and Patrick Richards were also present in the Closed Session. The Council reconvened in Open Session at 1:12 a.m. The City Attorney announced that only Item 14.E. was discussed and there was no action to report. Moorpark. C. Litigation concerning B.I.A. versus the City_of Moorpark. D. Litigation concerning_.Boething_v_ersus the City of Moorpark. E. Potential 11ti gat ion____pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1). - F. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c). MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to add a Closed Session item concerning A -C Construction versus the City of Moorpark, since a need to take action arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda. The voice vote was unanimous. The matter became Item 14.G. on the agenda. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to go into Closed Session to discuss those items listed. The voice vote was unanimous. The time of adjournment was 12:07 a.m. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, the Council recessed, the time being 12:08 a.m. At 12:12 a.m., the full Council reconvened and went into Closed Session. Steven Kueny, Cheryl Kane, and Patrick Richards were also present in the Closed Session. The Council reconvened in Open Session at 1:12 a.m. The City Attorney announced that only Item 14.E. was discussed and there was no action to report. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California _ 14 _ May 4, 1988 MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting to 5:30 p.m. on May 11, 1988, with Closed Session items considered from 5:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., and other agenda item consideration to begin at 7:00 p.m. The voice vote was unanimous. The time of adjournment was 1:15 a.m. ATTEST: