Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1988 0203 CC ADJMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCTL Moorpark, California February 3, 1988 The adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California was held on February 3, 1988, in the Council Chambers of City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order al.. 7:13 P.M. by Mayor John Galloway. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Harper. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Eloise Brown, Clint harper, John Lane, and Mayor John Galloway. Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development; Philip Newhouse, Director of Community Services; Thomas Genovese, Deputy City Manager; Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer; Lt. Michael Brown, Police Department; and Maureen W. Wall, City Clerk. 4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: A. Proclamation declaring February 5, 1988 as Ventura County Regional Law Enforcement Explorer Day in the City of Moorpark. In attendance to receive the proclamation. declaring February 5, 1988 as Ventura County Regional Law Enforcement Explorer Day in the City of Moorpark as read by Mayor John Galloway, were: Ron LeBlanch, Scott Peterson, Brian Masey, Miguel Ramirez, and Don Aguilar. Mr. LeBlanch outlined what the explorers had done. in the Ci.t.y of Moorpark and noted that Don Aguilar was chosen. as one of four explorers to be honored by the organization countywide. 5. REORDERING OF,_ AND ADDITIONS_TO, THE AGENDA_ On motion by Councilmember Brown seconded by Councilmember Harper, Resolution number 88 -442 was adclo.d for reconsideration to the agenda since the need to take action arose subsequent to the posting of the. agenda. Thy voi,o vot-.e was unanimous. Minutes of the City Council 2 February 3, 1988 Moorpark, California 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Taree Bollinger, 6431 Linville Ct., thanked the City Council and staff for their efforts to insure that truck travel along 118 would not be severely impacted during the reconstruction of Highway 101. B. Jim Hartley, 5950 Gabbert Rd., agreed with Ms. Bollinger's comment concerning truck traffic along Highway 118 during the reconstruction of Highway 101, and further asked the Council to move ahead on the realignment of Highway 118 through the Virginia Colony area and additionally the widening of highway 118 from Moorpark Avenue to Gabbert Road. He additionally addressed the Council concerning horse trails in the eastern portion of Ventura County asking that the City take a more active role in the planning of trails in the Moorpark area. C. Joel Kirschenstein, 2835 Townsgate, Thousand Oaks, representing Moorpark Unified School District, concerning item 8.G a Resolution concerning the high school site. He stated he would like this item continued to another meeting so that discussion coiild be started between School Board and the City Council. D. Scott Montgomery, 13069 Cloverdale, stated that as a candidate for the February 1988 election he had been more closely reviewing the financial abilities of the City and felt that the Finance Officer, which should be hired, should report directly to the City Council rather than the City Manager. Additionally felt this position should be responsible for budgeting, accounting, and investment functions within the City with regular reporting of the City's financial condition on a monthly basis. Additionally he felt the financial software package, which had been purchased by the City, should continue to be implemented and also that an investment software package should be purchased to enable the City to monit -or more closely its cash flow and to do finance forecasting. E. Paul Lawrason, 4291 Ambermeadow St., stated he felt the Park Maintenance District should be activated for the next fiscal year so that General Fund monies would not be used for this purpose. F. George E. Taylor, 10177 Stockton Rd., representing Bibo Inc. stated his client would like the opportunity to build apartments which would include Senior. Citizen and Affordable Housing units; however, they would like to be able to meet with a City Committee concerning what the City would be requiring for Senior Citizen and Affordable Housing in an effort to negotiate prior to their presentation to the City Council. He further stated this type of process is currently working well in the cities of Thousand Oaks and Minutes of the City Council 3 February 3, 1988 Moorpark, California Simi Valley. Councilmember Harper commented that he disagreed with Mr. Montgomery's comment and with his campaign ads which show that the City is on the verge of financial disaster. He also stated that he agreed the Parks Maintenance District should be reactivated. TheCity he felt was in excellent financial condition. Councilmember Lane agreed with Councilmember Harper, adding that he would like to see Mr. Montgomery come forward to work with staff and the City Council to perhaps improve the City's financial portfolio. Councilmember Brown commented that the City of Moorpark was probably the only City in Southern California which left something off of the tax roll last year. This comment was made regarding the non - activation of Parks Assessment for the fiscal year 1987/88. 7. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Councilmember Brown reported that she had attended the Transportation Policy and Planning Committee meeting and was reporting that the 1987 STIP Recommendation were to be carried forward and that a written report woiild follow shortly. Councilmember Lane reported he had contacted Senator Davis's office and was assured that trucks will not be taken off of highway 101 and re- routed to highway 1.1.8 during the highway 101 reconstruction project. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR: On a motion by Councilmember Harper seconded by Councilmember Brown and approved on an unanimous roll. call vote, the following items of the consent calendar worn. approved. A. Approval of Warrant Register: - Prepaid Warrants No. 6187 -6216 $ 41,721.94 - Payable Warrants No. 621.7 -6266 $296,326.07 B. Approval of the Minutes fo the Regular Meeting of January 6, 1988. Staff recommendation was to approve the Minutes as presented. D. Resolution No. 88 -444. A proposed resolution approving Planned Development Permit No. 1066 (Leonard Liston) for a 6,540 square foot automotive service center, and a 2,960 square foot full - service car wash on a .67 acre site on the west side of Parklane Avenue, approximately 130 feet south of Los Angeles Avenue. Staff recommendation was to approve the proposed resolution. Minutes of the City Council 4 February 3, 1988 Moorpark, California E. Consider the granting of an Easement Deed to Southern California Edison for elec - itrc_al_service access at Peach Hill Park. Staff recommendation was to grant the easement to Southern California Edison, and authorize the Mayor to sign the Easement Grant Deed on behalf of the City. F. Consider a proposed Simi Valley Landfill contract. Staff recommendation was to authorize the Mayor to present the City Councils concerns to other public agencies. G. Resolution No. 88 -445._ A proposed Resolution making certain findings and determinations and adopting a plan in relation to the purchase of the recreational areas of Moorpark Memorial High School. Staff recommendation was to approve the proposed resolution. H. Transmittal of survey findings from a Moorpark College Urban Studies Class. Staff recommendation was to receive and file the report. C. Authorize the recruitment for an additional Planning position. Staff recommendnt: ion was to authorize the recruitment. This item was pulled from the agenda and will be continued at a future time. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: No public hearings were scheduled. 10. COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS: A. Consider the City's appointment the Moorpark Mosquito Abatement District M.M.A.D. . Councilmember Brown nominated Mr. Jim Shaw for the appointment to the Moorpark Mosquito Abatement District. Mayor Galloway seconded the motion. During a discussion by Council, Councilmember Harper stated that he would like to have more information on each of the applicants for the appointed position on the board and would like to continue this item until he has an opportunity to directly contact each of the three .ipplicants. Mayor Galloway felt that all of the applicants were quite capable of serving and wanted to see the City take action at this meeting. He further commented that he would like to see more people involved. Couilcil.member Lane commented he was not familiar with the applicants and would like more information from each one concerning their qualifications. The voice vote on the motion concerning the nomination of Mr. Jim Shaw failed with Councilmember Brown voting yes, Mayor Galloway voting yes, and Councilmembers Harper and Lane voting no. Minutes of the City Council 5 February 3, 1988 Moorpark, California Council additionally directed staff to bring back more information on how the Moorpark Mosquito Abatement District was formed and what legal requirements there might be concerning composition of the board. It was Council's desire to ask the Ventura County Board of Supervisors to allow the City to have additional appointments to the Mosquito Abatement District Board. As it currently stands, the City is afforded only one appointment to the board and Council was concerned that since this district is in the Moorpark area, we are not afforded enough representation to insure that the needs of the City are met. B. Report from the Histhway 118 Strategy Committee. Mayor Galloway commented he would like to see the Highway 118 Summit /Action Committee disbanded at this time since there does not appear to be a need for this Committee. He did thank the Committee members, however, who had volunteered their time. Additionally, lie presented a draft of the second issue of the status 118 -23 quarterly. Councilmember Lane commented he would like to see the telephone numbers and addresses for our State, Federal and Caltrans officers involved with the Highway 118 -23 connection to allow our citizens the opportunity to directly contact our representatives to indicate the City's support of this project. Councilmember Lane also asked for a brief synopsis of the current and anticipated projects on state routes within Moorpark. Mayor Galloway commented he would bring back a final draft of the news letter on February 10th for the Councils approval prior to issue number two's publication. C. Consider the rotation of appointment to the Highway 118 Strategy Committee. Rotation among the Councilmembers to this committee would remove Mayor Galloway from the committee and appoint Councilmember Lane and Councilmember Harper to the Highway 118 Strategy Committee. Councilmember Lane's term will end in June of 1988. D. Consider the City's appointment to the Ventura County Arts Commission. Councilmember Harper asked that this .item be continued to a future Council meeting so Lhat he might have the opportunity to speak with the two applicants who had volunteered their services to the County Arts Commission. By consensus of Council, this item will be brought back on the February 17th agenda. E. Councilmember Brown indicated that the full Council had attended the D.A.R.E. graduation which was recently held. Minutes of the City Council 6 February 3, 1988 Moorpark, California She thanked Lt. Mike Brown a►id Community Services Officer David Lea for their efforts and service to the community on the D.A.R.E. Program. She further indicated that she was very impressed with the results of this first program. Lt. Michael Brown thanked the City Council for their support and leadership in providing the program. F. Councilmember Lane indicated he would also like to see support from the media in advertising for the "Kid Print Day" which will be held in the City this next weekend. Councilmember Lane further commented that he would like to see the City understand that a lawsuit against the City is a lawsuit against the citizens of that City. G. Councilmember Harper questioned whether or not it is the citizens and the City Council who govern a City or whether it is interested developers. He further commented he would like to see the citizens support our right over the developers challenges against Measure F, since it is citizen's right to govern their City. 11. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS: A. Consider the establishment of priorities for City projects_ and responsibilities. Staffs recommendation was to ask Council to give staff direction as they deemed appropriate. City Manager, Steven Kueny outlined the following top priorities for City Departments: Department of Community Development: 1. Building and Safety function alternatives which should be in place by Tune or July 1, 1988. 2. Land use and circulation update. 3. Downtown plan to brought back to the City Council for possible adoption in March or early April. 4. Consideration of the Carlsberg Specific Plan. 5. Revisions to certain sections of the zoning codes. 6. Traffic Mitigation Assessment and possible ordinance in an effort to move away from the current practice of establishing areas of contribution. It was by consensus of Council that item number six was added to the priorities for the Department of Community Development. 7. Item seven concerns Ordinance No. 51 (mobile home Minutes of the City Council 7 February 3, 1988 Moorpark, California rent control) which sunsets in July 1988. In discussion by Council, Councilmembers Lane and Harper volunteered to work as a committee of the City Council to work with staff on the revision of Ordinance No. 51 to expedite that process. Community Services Department: 1. Senior Citizen Center. 2. Downtown park development. 3. Tree removal with the curb, gutter, and tree replacement program. 4. Conceptual designs of the pedestrian bridge for the Community Park. 5. Landscaping of the area commonly called Marlboro project (corner of Peach Hill and Spring Road). City Manager: 1. Gann Appropriation Limit Consideration. 2. Ventura County Cable T.V. franchise renewal. 3. Water Works District No. 1 study concerning possible transfer of functions to the City. 4. Redevelopment feasibility study. 5. Solid waste concerns. Deputy City Manager: 1. Peach Hill Park construction project. 2. City Hall construction project. 3. Financial management including software implementation. The selection of a Finance Officer and coordinating the completion of the 1986/87 audit. 4. Preparation of the 1987/88 budget. 5. Investigation of the participation in a joint powers agreement for an insu-nnce pool. City Clerk: 1. Codification of the City's municipal code. 2. Recruitment and training of the Executive Secretary Minutes of the City Council 8 February 3, 1988 Moorpark, California 3. 4. 5. 6. position along with hiring of temporary help. Completion of the minutes backlog. Reorganization of the City's centralized filing system. Automation of the Master index and indexing of the centralized filling system. Administration of the February and June elections. City Attorney: 1. Litigation. 2. Formalize the transfer of parkland to U.S. Condo. 3. Cable T.V. franchise renewal. 4. Modification of our contract with developers for preparing EIR's and case planning work to insure that there are no guarantees implied to applicants. 5. Assistance on discussions with Moorpark Unified School District concerning the high school site. 6. The City's options regarding a potential truck ban on highway 101. City Engineer: 1. Completion of the Capital. Improvement Program. (Currently in draft form). 2. Standardized public works contract. 3. Completion of the Tierra Rejada Road and bridge project. 4. Widening of highway 118 thria the Virginia Colony. 5. Widening of highway 11.8 on the West side of Moorpark. 6. Possible undergrounding of the utilities at the corner of Spring Road and High Street. 7. Completion of traffic signal projects in the City. 8. Preparation of a Citywide traffic mitigation ordinance. 9. Annual Assessment District Program. 10. Overlay and slurry seal Program. 11. Alternate route for new Los Angeles Avenue study. Minutes of the City Council 9 February 3, 1988 Moorpark, California Police Department: 1. Truck scale. 2. Arcade Ordinance. 3. DUI fines. 4. Five year law enforcement cost. (Which is currently in draft form.) 5. Emergency railroad crossing. 6. Bail Standardization. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, Council recessed, the time being 9:00 P.M. At 9:25 P.M. the full Council reconvened. B. Discussion of the Sphere of Influence boundaries for the City of Moorpark. Staff recommendation was to ask Council to give staff direction as they deemed appropriate. Steven Kueny gave an overview of the staff report dated November 18, 1987. He further commented that the Council needs to make a decision as to whether or not we are interested in extending our sphere of influence so that this matter might be considered during the public hearing for the scope of the General Plan iipdate. Councilmember Brown stated that she would like to see the City include a portion of the Tierra Rejada greenbelt within the City's limits. She further stated she felt that the greenbelt was being eroded by virtue of the fact that the City of Simi Valley acquired a portion of the greenbelt in their sphere of influence and that there is a proposed presidential library in the greenbelt area and that several smaller changes had been brought forward by LAFCO and agreed to by the adjoining cities. Councilmember Harper stated he does not want to see the City of Moorpark include this area within the City limits as he would like to see the area remain as a greenbelt under the conditions of the current cooperative agreement between County and the Cities of Simi Valley, Thousand Oaks, and Moorpark. He further stated that lie would like to see the Planning Commission look ai, possibility of extending both the area of interest and the sphere of influence during their review of the General Plan update. He additionally would like the Commission to review the. County's General Plan update at the same time. Councilmember Lane commented he would like to see another route into Moorpark College and also would like to see the Tierra Rejada greenbelt area extended up to the ridge line. Councilmember Harper asked that the Planning Commission and Minutes of the City Council 10 February 3, 1988 Moorpark, California staff keep the City Council fully apprized of any changes or effects which might result- from the County's General Plan update and the City of Simi. Valley General Plan update. Additionally, Councilmember Harper asked that a letter be directed to LAFCO inquiring as to their policy on extending a sphere of influence verses actual annexation of land to the City. The following motion was then heard. _MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Lane seconded a Motion to direct_ staff and the Planning Commission to review increasing our area of interest and the sphere of influence on the Fast and West portions of the City to include the sphere of influence in the scope of work for the General Plan update and to additionally direct correspondence to LAFCO concerning sphere of influence verses annexation. The voice vote was unanimo ►►s. C. Consider a report concern!.4g_councilmanic districts. Staff recommendation was to ask Council to give staff direction as they deemed appropriate. Councilmember Harper commented that in an informal survey recently completed, most citizens have indicated they are not in favor of councilmanic.. district.. After brief discussion the following motion was heard. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Lane seconded a Motion to receiv» and file this report. The voice vote was unanimous. D. Review of Ordinance No. 89 which concerns tree preservation. Staff recommendation was Lc ask Council to give staff direction as they deemed appropriate. Mayor Galloway reported that th had reviewed the City's current some suggested alterations. lie might present a draft ordinance future Council meeting. Tree Preservation Committee urgency ordinance and did have suggested that the committee to the City Council at a Councilmember Harper suggested that the ordinance might be written so that. it would al)pl.y only to trees which are visible from City property. This would exclude trees which were in the backyards of residents of the City. The following motion was t1vo-i heard. _MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a Motion to direct: the tree preservation committee to review the ordinance and to bring back their recommendation in the form of a draft ordinance for the City Council's review as soon as possible. The voice vote was unanimous. Minutes of the City Council 1.1 February 3, 1988 Moorpark, California E. Consider guidelines for use of the City's Social Services account. Staff recommendation was that Council give staff direction as they deemed appropriate. The staff report was waived for this item. After a brief discussion the following motion was heard. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Lane seconded a Motion to give a two hundred dollar limit to each Councilmember per occurrenc=e with reimbursement from the City and to additionally direct that staff bring back a resolution stating this policy for City Council approval. The voice vote was unanimous. F. Consider a report regarding the Overlay Zones. Staff recommendation was that Coiinci.l give staff direction as they deemed appropriate. Patrick Richards gave an overview of the staff report dated January 15, 1988. Councilmember Harper said lie was in support of staff recommendations number 1,2, and 3 of the staff report dated January 15, 1988 and would add a fourth item to that recommended action which would extend this concept to other areas within the City. Mayor Galloway commented he would like to see this concept broadened to land uses as opposed to a design overlay. He would like to see land uses included in the General Plan update which would extend to commercial and industrial areas when they are adjacent to a residential area. Councilmember Brown commented she was hesitant to force a particular design on a development. She felt is was an individual developer's right to bring forth a design of their choosing. After further discussion, the following motion was heard. MOTION: Councilmember Lane moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a Motion to receive and file this report. The motion was approved with Councilmembers Brown and Lane and Mayor Galloway voting yes and Councilmember Harper voting no. Mayor Galloway commented that commercial and industrial uses next to residential areas heeds to be addressed perhaps through an overlay in the General Plan update. Councilmember Brown additionally asked that the Design Standards Committee present a report to the City Council giving a listing of projects which they are currently working on. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, the Council recessed, the time being 11:00 P.M. At 11:17 P.M. the full Council reconvened. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, item 11.1i was heard. Minutes of the City Council 12 February 3, 1988 Moorpark, California H. Consider awarding the site preparation contract for the Seniot Citizens Center and appropriating the necessary funds. Staffs recommendation was to ask that Council give staff direction as they deemed appropriate. The staff report on this item was deferred in the interest of time. Councilmember Brown stated that an alternative to this project would be to allow the area currently used by City staff to be used as the Senior Citizen Center and a permanent wall in place of the current accordion wall could be constructed. Additionally, kitchen and restroom facilities could be added to the existing building. She stated it was her feeling that there would be a substantial savings in the cost of this alternative as opposed to the current $326,285.00 projected cost of building a new Senior Citizens Center. Councilmember Harper commented that there had been a plan presented In the past which showed the Senior Citizens Center being added next to the kitchen area of the Community Center. After brief discussion, the following motion was heard. MOTION: Councilmember Lane moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a Motion to have the Senior Citizens Center Ad Hoc Committee look at this previously submitted addition to the Community Center and additionally to consider the possible use of the area currently used by City staff with a report back to the City Council in the near future. The voice vote was unanimous. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, item ll.G was heard. G. Consider an aligMent study along Highway 118 through the Virginia Colony area. Staffs recommendation was to ask that Council give staff direction as they deemed appropriate. Dennis Delzeit gave an overview of his March 10, 1986 alignment study report. Councilmember Brown asked if it would not be a more immediate benefit if the City were to re- stripe this portion of the roadway and to insure that the roadway shoulders were maintained in a safe manner. Councilmember Harper indicated he would be interested in 1.he City determining which of the four alternatives presented in the March 1986 report would give the City the most benefit for their money. Mr. Delzeit responded that the most viable alternative in his opinion would be alternate number i:wo but that it would be important for the Council to consider the cost /benefit ratio. He further indicated that this project as submitted in alternative number two would take approximately two to three years to complete. Councilmember Lane asked if the City might not consider using pre-cast cement dividers and additionally widening the roadway as proposed in alternate Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 13 February 3, 1988 number four of the March 1986 study. By consensus of Council, the City Engineer was directed to look into the cost of pre -cast cement dividers and /or the use of wood and metal guard rails down the center divider area and to determine what the cost associated might be with the completion of alternate number four. This item will be brought back to the City Council at the City's next regularly scheduled meeting of February 17, 1988. Additionally, the City Engineer's office was directed to look into the possibility of the creation of protected turn lanes into the cement batch plant areas for those businesses along the Virginia Colony area and /or the possibility of not allowing left turn lanes along this portion of Highway 118, and additionally to investigate in general the overall rights -of- way acquisition problem. Councilmember Harper additionally asked that the City Attorney look into possible uses of the $180,000.00 which is on deposit from Griffin in the Los Angeles Avenue Alternate Route Area of Contribution Fund. After further discussion, the following motion was heard. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Lane seconded a Motion to appropriate $5,000.00 out of the Los Angeles Avenue area of contribution to cover costs which might be incurred by the City Engineer during his initial study of alternative number four with staff coming back to Council if an additional appropriation is needed. The roll call vote was unanimous. I. Consider contractual services for financial administration services. This item was deferred to the adjourned meeting to be held February 10, 1988. J. Consider a report regardinK future buildiag and safety services. Staff recommendation was to ask that Council give staff direction to send a Request for Proposal (RFP) out to firms providing contract building and safety services. Patrick Richards gave an overview of the staff report dated January 27, 1988. After some discussion by Council, the following motion was heard. MOTION: Councilmember Lana moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a Motion to direct that staff to solicit bids from firms to provide interim plan check services to begin April 1, 1988 and to return to the Council on March 16, 1988 with a recommendation for award, and to direct that staff forward the draft request for a proposal as presented to firms interested in providing building and safety services to the City. After some consideration by Council, the following Minutes of the City Council 14 February 3, 1988 Moorpark, California amendment to the motion was heard. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a Motion to amend the request for proposal so that a potential bidder could bid on engineering services as well as building and safety or could bid on engineering or building and safety services individually. The voice vote was unanimous. The original motion as amended was then considered. The voice vote was unanimous. K. Consider scheduling the next Town Hull Meeting and determining topics for the meeting. Staff recommendation was to schedule the next meeting and determine the topics of discussion. In the interest of time, the staff report was waived. The following motion was heard. MOTION: Councilmember Lane moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a Motion to set March 26, 1988 from 9:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. for the next Town Hall Meeting with the topics of discussion to be: 1. An update on all programs and projects included in the adopted 1987/88 budget. 2. To give an overview of the City's goals and priorities. 3. Discussions concerning the Gann Appropriation limit. 4. A report from the City Engineer concerning the existing areas of contribution funds. The voice vote was unanimous. L. Review of the City's appropriation limit and consideration of alternative actions. By consensus of Council, the City Attorney was directed to prepare an analysis and the City Clerk was directed to return to the Adjourned Meeting of February 10 with the resolutions necessary to call a special election. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, Item 14 was heard. 14. CLOSED SESSION: On a motion by Councilmember Harper seconded by Councilmember Lane the Council adjourned to Closed Session to discuss all items on the agenda, the time was 12:22 A.M. The voice vote was unanimous. At 12:40 A.M., the full Council reconvened. Minutes of the City Council 15 February 3, 1988 Moorpark, California City Attorney, Cheryl Kane reported there was no action to report out of closed session. By consensus of Council, the remainder of the following items will be heard at the adjourned meeting of February 10, 1988. 11. M. Consider a response to a letter from John W. Newton & Associates, Inc. dated January 13, 1988 concerning Moorpark City Council /Affordable Housing Committee. N. Consider a report concerning a flood control access road for Tierra Rejada Road Just south of Tierra Reiada Bridge. 0. Reconsideration of Resolution No. 88 -442 (Urban West Communities). 12. ORDINANCES: A. Ordinance No. 94. A proposed Ordinance amending the zoning of an 8.5 acre parcel within PC -3 from "PC" (Planned Community) to RPD6.5U. The site is located on Walnut Creek Road north of Tierra Rejada Road. Staff recommendation was to approve the proposed Ordinance for second reading and adoption. This Ordinance was not considered for second reading and adoption. B. Ordinance No. 95. A proposed Ordinance amending a 2.23 acre site at the southwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Spring Road from TPD (Trailer Park Development) to CPD (Commercial Planned Development). Staff recommendation was to approve the proposed Ordinance for second reading and adoption. City Attorney, Cheryl Kane read the Ordinance in title and the following motion was heard. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a Motion to wave further reading of the Ordinance and to declare the ordinance read for the second time. The voice vote was unanimous. The following motion was heard. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Lane seconded a Motion to declare the Ordinance adopted. The voice vote was unanimous. 13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: The following items were brought: forward as future agenda items: The Consideration of whether or not the Griffin Homes contribution Minutes of the City Council 16 February 3, 1988 Moorpark, California to the Los Angeles Avenue Alternate Route Area of Contribution Fund can be used for any other purposes. A report concerning response time in the last six month by Pruner Ambulance (This report is to be presented to Council within 30 days). A general report from the Code Enforcement Officer. 15. ADJOURNMENT: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a Motion to adjourn this meeting to February 10, 1988 at 6:00 P.M. The voice vote was unanimous. The time was 12:50 A.M. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk