Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1988 0518 CC REGMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark , California Ma�T 18, 1988 The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California was held on May 18, 1988 in the Council Chambers of City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: The Meeting was called to order at 7 :20 p.m. by Mayor John Lane. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Galloway. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Eloise Brown, John Galloway, Clint Harper, Bernardo Perez and Mayor John Lane. Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl. Kane, City Attorney; Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development; Philip Newhouse, Director of Community Services; Thomas Genovese, Deputy City Manager; Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer; Lieutenant Mike Brown, Sheriff's Department; and Maureen Wall, City Clerk. 4. PROCLAMATIONS, _.COMMENDATIONS, __ SPECIAL - PRESENTATIONS_ A. Proclamation declaring May as Neighborhood Watch Month in the City of Moorpark. Mayor John Lane presented David Lea, Senior Deputy of the Crime Prevention Bureau, with a proclamation proclaiming May as Neighborhood Watch Month in the City of Moorpark. Additionally, Lieutenant Mike Brown introduced and recognized four Moorpark residents for their participation in the Neighborhood Program. They were: Beverly Harris, Robin Harkell, Allen Ricard and Tony Valdez. 5. REORDERING OF AND ADDITIONS TO, - THE, AGENDA No changes were made. 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS: 6. A. Connie Lawrason, 4291 Ambermeadow Street, informed the Council of a proposed development within the City of Thousand Oaks known as McCrea Ranch which, as an option of development, might result in the closure of Moorpark Road. She asked the Council to write to the City of Thousand Oaks asking them not to close Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California _ _ _ 2 _ _ May 18, 1988 this widely used roadway between the City of Moorpark and the City of Thousand Oaks. 6. B. Maury Froman, 520 Broadway Suite 1.00, (Urban West Communities) stated his firm favored the southerly route of the two alternatives offered for the realignment of Tierra Rejada Road In Item 11.13. of this Agenda. He further stated their position, and the reasons they were requesting a zone change of the County under Item 11.C. of this Agenda, and asked Council to support this zone change. 6. C. Gere Kritzer, 12794 Summer Street, stated there is a continuing moisture problem in his housing tract., and further stating he had no response concerning his problem from the developer. 6.D. Carolyn Schrimpf, 12788 Summer Street:, President of the Butterereek Homeowners Association, stated Urban West Communities is attempting to take care of the moisture problem, however it is their organization's opinion that they are taking too long to resolve it. 6. E. Jim Hartley, 5950 Gabbert, questioned whether or not he would be able to speak at this portion of the Agenda or during 9.B, a Public Hearing item on this Agenda concerning the General Plan Update. 6. F. Phil Vein, 6635 Princeton, spoke concerning Items 8. C. and 8. I. on the Agenda. lie indicated that their. proposed Tract 3049 needs to have a balanced grading on this site, and requested the issuance of a grading permit in order to accomplish this. Councilmember Harper questioned the City Engineer's Department concerning the continuing moisture problem in the housing tract. Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer, responded that the Assistant City Engineer has been participating on the Committee, and a report concerning the problem will be presented to Council on a future agenda. Councilmember Galloway commented that this committee reviewing the moisture problem was not a City committee, but rather a committee formed by the developer with the Assistant City Engineer only participating as a member of the committee. 6. G. Mary Gayle, 350 N. Lantana Street, Camarillo, Counsel for Pardee Construction, stated that she was available for any questions Council might have concerning item 11.A. on this Agenda. Councilmember Brown commented she was aware of the proposed McCrea Ranch project, and the possible closing of Moorpark Road. She felt the matter would be further investigated by the City Council. 7. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Minutes of the City Council Moorpark,�California 3 May 18,f1988 Councilmember Brown gave a report concerning the VCAG Executive and Policy Committee meetings which she attended in the past week. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR: On a motion by Councilmember Harper and seconded by Councilmember Galloway, the following items were approved by a unanimous roll can vote of the Council: 8. A. Approval of Warrant Register:_ - Prepaid Warrants No. 6708, 6719 -6727, 6784 -6793 $191,214.03 - Payable Warrants No. 6794 -6833, 6835 $223,330.07 8. B. Consider an update to _ the City Hall_ Construction Project. Staff recommended that the Council review the Change Orders and receive and file this report. 8. C. Consider a staff report regarding the need to amend the City's Residential Development Management System (RDMS) . Staff recommended that the Council adopt a resolution instructing Staff and the Planning Commission to amend the RDMS. 8.D. Consider a staff report concerning the_ need to establish a fee schedule for Building and Safety services. Staff recommended that Council direct staff to set .June 1, 1988 as a Public Hearing regarding the establishment of a fee schedule. 8. E. Consider authorizing the Mayor to sign documents on behalf of the City concerning the abandonment and sale of park land (500 -0 -281 -073) to Varsity Park Estates. recommended that the Council authorize the Mayor to execute all necessary documents. 8.G. Resolution No. 88 -470. A Resolution approving a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the Public Employees' Association of Ventura County (PE.,AVC) . Staff recommended that the Resolution be approved. 8. H. Consider a request to replace missing and deteriorated equipment, add new eguipment,_and_overlay the ap thway in Campus Park_ Staff recommended that the Council approve the Park and Recreation Commission's recommendation and appropriate the necessary funds. 8.J. Consider a status report_ concerning si nal modification at the intersection of Spring Road and New Los Angeles Avenue by MASH Associates. Staff recommended that this report be received and filed. 8. K. Consideration of a waiver_ of franchise fee applicable for the low income senior citizens discount plan offered by Ventura County Cab_levisio_n_._ Staff recommended that the waiver be approved. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark.. California 4 _ May_ 18, 1988 The following items were pulled for individual. consideration by the Council: 8. F. Consider creating a sub- committee of the Park_ s and Recreation Commission to plan a city -wide celebration for the 4th of July. Staff recommended appointment of Commissioners Roberts and Crockatt to the sub - committee. Councilmember Brown stated she would like to encourage the Parks and Recreation Commission to form their own committee and to direct that that committee would come back to the Council with their recommendation. Councilmember Galloway commented that consideration might be given as to whether or not the City is interested in having fireworks for our 5th Anniversary and 4th of July celebration. Mayor Lane indicated he has been informed that the Parks and Recreation Commission is looking for a way to raise funds and is also looking for a possible celebration site. At this point the following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to suggest that the Parks and Recreation Commission form their own sub - committee and that the Commission come back to the City Council with their formal recommendation. The motion was approved by a unanimous voice vote. 8.I. Consider approval of an Agreement to Construct Improvements and approval of the Final Map for Tract_ 31149 (A &R Development) located in the Campus Park area of the City. Staff recommended that the Council approve the Final Map, authorize the Mayor to sign the necessary documents on behalf of the City, and direct the City Clerk to hold the map until all requirements have been met. Dennis Delzeit gave an overview of the drainage question, indicating this type of drain is not normally maintained by individual property owners, and further suggesting that the drain be maintained by the public. It was his feeling that this would require minimal maintenance on the City's part. Councilmember Harper suggested that if we were going to accept this type of improvement, then the City needs to implement a formal maintenance inspection program. Councilmember Brown concurred with Councilmember Harper's suggestion. The following Motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved, Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to approve the final map for Tract No. 3049, and authorize the Mayor to sign the title sheet accepting for Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 5 Ma, 18 _1988 public use the right -of -way for all streets, the necessary rights for ingress and egress, and the easements for public service purposes and storm drain purposes as shown on the maps; authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement for construction of subdivision improvements and the subdivision sewer agreement for the subject tract, and direct the City Clerk to retain the original agreement and return an executed copy to the developer and surety company; direct the City Clerk not to release the subject map for recordation until the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution Fees have been paid, the City -owned parcel of land has been transferred to the developer, and the CC &R's have been approved by the Director of Community Development; delete the easement dedication required by Condition No. 66; and to direct Staff to implement a maintenance and inspection of drains program with a report back to Council identifying the funding source of this proposed maintenance program. The Motion was approved by a unanimous voice vote. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, the following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to adjourn the City Council meeting to a meeting of the Mobile Home Park Rent Review Board. The voice vote was unanimous. 1. A. Mobile Home Park Rent Review Board review._Pf a proposed Moorpark Mobile Home Park rent increase. Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development recommended that this matter be continued until the June 15, 1988 meeting. By concensus of the Review Board, this matter was continued until June 15, 1988. MOTION: Review Board Member Harper moved and Review Board Member Brown seconded a motion to adjourn the Mobile Home Park Rent Review Board, and to reopen the meeting of the City Council. The voice vote was unanimous. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS : 9. A. Mobile Home Rent Control /Ordinance No. 51 Revisions. This Public Hearing was called to consider i report concerning revisions to the City's Ordinance No. 51. Patrick Richards gave an overview of the Staff Report dated May 9, 1988, which outlined six areas which are being recommended for change. There were no questions of Staff by the Council. Mayor Lane opened the Public Hearing. 9.A -1. Keith Casenhiser, 725 Brea Canyon Road, Suite 6, Walnut Canyon, Manager of Villa Del Arroyo Mobile Home Park, stated that he was pleased to report that his company Is in basic agreement with the recommended changes. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California _ 6 _ _ _ .May 18, 1988 9.A-2. Paul Coyle, 15750 Los Angeles Avenue, 4151, President of the Villa Del Arroyo Mobile Home Park Association, agreed with the changes as outlined by Mr. Casenhiser. He recommended that the City Council accept the changes and direct that the amended Ordinance be brought back for Council's consideration. 9.A-3. Joe Intiso, Villa Del Arroyo Mobile Home Park, stated he was in agreement with the recommended changes, and thanked the Committee Members and the members of the Council who participated in the negotiations. 9. A -4. Cheryl Fay, 1750 E. Los Angeles Avenue #17, stated she appreciated interest in the suggested amendments to Ordinance No. 51, and also thanked the management of the park, stating that all groups involved had worked very hard to reach a concensus concerning the changes. Councilmember Galloway suggested that the proposed changes be made and an amended Ordinance be brought back for Council's consideration. Councilmember Perez commented he felt the possibility of two rent increases being allowed within one year conflicted with the idea of accommodating valid financial hardship cases. Councilmember Harper suggested the changes be made with a draft presented to the sub - committee for their review and then subsequently brought to the Council for their consideration. After further discussion by Council concerning the composition of a review board to review hardship cases, the following Motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to direct Staff to prepare a draft of the proposed changes which would clearly indicate there would be an automatic increase of either the Consumer Price Index or 5 %, whichever is less; and additionally, to indicate a hardship process which would ensure the confidentiality of the park residents with the appeal being made to the Director of Community Development. After some discussion, the following amendment to the main motion was heard: AMENDMENT TO THE MAIN MOTION: Councilmember Lane moved, Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to appoint the Mayor and one other Councilmember, plus a representative of the owner of the Park to meet and confer concerning hardship cases with their decision being final. The voice vote concerning the amendment was approved, with Councilmember Galloway voting no. The Motion, as amended, was approved by a unanimous voice vote. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 7 May 18, 1988 Councilmember Galloway stated he was not in favor of the amendment to the motion and felt that specific guidelines might have been added to the Ordinance which would have been sufficient. for Staff to handle the situation, and also protect the resident's right to privacy. 9. B. Determine the scope of work_ for an update to the City's Land Use and Circulation Elements - including the Casey Road high school site and several prgp rties_ previously considered. Staff asked Council for direction as they deemed appropriate. Councilmember Lane announced that no further public testimony would be taken on this item since the Public Hearing had been previously closed. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, the full Council recessed, the time being 8:50 p. M. At 9:05 p.m., the full Council reconvened. The following motion was heard: MOTION: Mayor Lane moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to reopen the Public Hearing to allow those individuals who had submitted speaker cards but had not previously spoken during the public hearing portion of this item and opportunity to address the Council. Councilmember Brown stated she objected to the reopening of the Public Hearing and she was concerned that people who might have thought the public hearing was closed did not attend the meeting, but would have if they had known they might have been given the opportunity to speak. Councilmember Galloway stated he felt the public hearing should not have been reopened once it had been closed. He felt the public hearing should be advertised if the Council was to allow further testimony. Councilmember Harper commented this would not be the last public hearing that would occur on this matter. AMENDMENT TO THE MAIN MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember Brown seconded an amendment to the motion to indicate that the public hearing will be continued to a future date for additional public input to be given. This would apply only to those who have not previously addressed the City Council concerning this item. The voice vote was unanimous. The Motion, as amended, was approved unanimously. 9.B-1. Mr. Tom Baldwin, 6475 Pepperdine, proposed that some of the high school site area in question be used by the City and some of the area of the high school site be sold. 9.B-2. Lorene Gartner, 148 Moorpark Avenue, stated she was not in favor of selling the high school site, indicating that the buildings were in good condition and should be kept for the community's use. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California _. 8 May 18, 1988 9.B-3. Richard Chavez, 651 Diablo Avenue, indicated he was not in favor of including the high school site in the General Plan Update. He indicated the site was of historical value and could still be used by citizens of the City. 9.13-4. Don Shotliff, 11822 Elwin Road, asked the Council not to get involved with the proposed sale of the high school site. Ile further indicated the site should be used by students and not sold. 9.B-5. Irene Barrera, 176 2nd Street, stated she was not in favor of selling the high school site, and asked the City Council not to allow a change in the zoning. 9.B-6. Diane Johnson, 14294 E. Los Angeles Avenue, asked that the high school site not be included in the General Plan Update. 9. B -7. Jim Hartley, 5950 Gabbert, stated he would like to see the high school site included in the General Plan Update since he felt this would be in line with good, long -range planning. By including it, all options concerning the best use of the site could be explored. 9.13-8. Dennis Hatland, 12431 Hillside Drive, stated he was in favor of considering the high school site in the General Plan Update in order that all options concerning the site might be considered. 9.B-9. Cynthia Hubbard -Dow, 8873 Roseland Avenue, stated she felt the school district should be treated like any other land owner, and should go through all of the regular processes as any land owner would. 9.B -10. Ted Green, 15354 E. Benwood Drive, stated he does not want the high school site sold. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, Mayor Lane closed the public hearing when no one else wished to speak. After some discussion by Council, the following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to continue this Public Bearing to the May 25, 1988 meeting. The voice vote was unanimous. Councilmember Brown commented sl citizens on this item, but further site is not within the purvue of the the consideration of whether or not would be changed. e appreciated the concern of the stated that the disposition of the Council; Council can only address the zoning for the high school site 9. C. A presentation by The Planning Center regarding the need to amend the contract to complete work on the Downtown Plan. Staff recommended consideration of the draft plan; amendment of the contract to allow for attendance at future meetings; Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California _ 9 May 18, 1988 direction that the Planning Commission forward their recommendations on the draft plan to the City Council, and setting this matter for Public Hearing on the next available regular meeting date. Patrick Richards recommended this item be continued to the Council's June 1, 1988 meeting. The following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to continue this item to .Tune 1, 1988. The voice vote was unanimous. 10. COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS : 10. A. Councilmember Galloway commented he was concerned with the City's current leash laws, stating he felt. owners should be responsible for cleaning tip after their pets. The City Attorney was directed to report to the Council at a future meeting concerning the City's leash laws. Councilmember Galloway additionally stated he would like to see the City invest in a terminal in order to bring on a stat line an agenda bulletin board for access by the general public. 10. B. Councilmember Brown commented she would like to see no dogs allowed within the City parks. 10. C. Mayor Lane commented he was concerned with the backlog of minutes and the lack of adequate of recording equipment for the Council meetings. 11. DISCUSSIONLACTION ITEMS: ll.A. Consider the acceptance of off - street_ drainage improvements in Tract 2865 -3 (Pardee Constructio_n_)__,_ Staff asked for direction as they deemed appropriate. Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer, gave an overview of the Staff Report dated April 25, 1988 concerning this item. Councilmember Harper commented he still feels that if the City were to accept this type of improvement that we need to implement a maintenance program. Councilmember Brown indicated that she would like to see the intake into the drain protected so that debris would not clog the drain, and additionally, that Staff not rely on the rainy season schedule in order to check the drains; but that the drains should be checked on a regular basis throughout the year. Councilmember Harper also felt the homeowner's associations should be responsible for this type of improvement in the future. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 10 May 18, 1988 Steven Kueny, City Manager, additionally suggested that Pardee might be required to add driveway access to both locations, and place wrought iron gates in the appropriate areas; and additionally asked that Pardee provide funds or landscaping along the remaining portion of Tierra Rejada Road as part of the conditions of their tract. Mr. Ted Cullins of Pardee then addressed Council stating Pardee was willing to take care of the landscaping along Tierra Rejada Road in a manner meeting approval of Staff; and, additionally, they would be happy to work with the City Engineer regarding accesses to make this as functional, for the City as possible. The following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to accept the storm drain easement as shown on the exhibits, provided Pardee agrees to maintain the drains for one year and, further, accept the Pardee landscaping of that portion of parkway along Tierra Rejada Road in addition to providing wrought iron gates and concrete accesses; and further, that a policy regarding whether or not maintenance for this type of improvements would be borne by a homeowners association or the City be brought back for Council's consideration. AMENDMENT TO THEMAIN MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded an amendment to the main motion which indicated that a schedule for a maintenance program would be brought back to the Council for their review. The voice vote concerning the amendment was unanimous. The Motion, as amended, was approved by unanimous voice vote. 11. B. Consider the realignment of _Tierra Rejada Road between _S rin Road and Moorpark Road (south_ ) (Urban West Communities - West Village Conditioner Staff recommended that Council give direction as they deemed appropriate. City Engineer, Dennis Delzeit, gave n brief overview of this item from his report dated May 6, 1988. Councilmember Galloway commented he would like to find out if it would be possible to acquire the right-of-way necessary for Alternative 1, and the cost involved, prior to determining which alternative might be used for the realignment. Councilmember Harper stated he favored Alternate No. 1 and would like Staff to contact the landowner to see if negotiations could be accomplished in the very near future. After this determination was made, Council could then consider which alternative they preferred. . Councilmember Brown stated she preferred Alternative No. 1 and would like to see the City move ahead to contact the landowner. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 11 May 18, 1988 The following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to adopt Alternative No. 1 as the preferred alternative, and to direct Staff to contact the affected property owner to determine whether or not the necessary right -of -way could be acquired. The voice vote was unanimous. 11. C. Consider a report concerning proposed County of Ventura Parcel Map #4146 (Urban West Communities) - 21.9_ acres in 2 parcels outside the City limits adjacent to PC -3. Staff recommended that the County be requested to study the subject area. Pat Richards gave a brief overview of his reported dated May 13, 1988. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, the Council recessed, the time being 1.0:45 p.m. At 11:00 p.m., the full. Council reconvened. Councilmember Harper stated that he felt Staff's recommendation was adequate, and the following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to direct Staff to contact the County of Ventura and request that the subject area be studied prior to the granting of any entitlement request. The voice vote was unanimous. Councilmember Brown asked that the Council be kept fully aware of what was happening at the County level concerning this item. The following items were considered in one report given by Steven Kueny: 11.D. Resolution No. 88 -471. A resolution approving the Engineer's Report for "Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1988 and ending June 30, 1989. Staff recommended approval of the Resolution. 11.E. Resolution No. 88 -472. A resolution approving the Engineer's Report for the "Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1" for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1.988 and ending June 30, 1989. Staff recommended approval of the Resolution. 11. F. Resolution No. 88 -473. A resolution ordering the annual assessments for the "Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1988 and ending June 30, 1989, and fixing a time and place for hearing objections thereto. Staff recommended approval of the resolution . 11-G. Resolution No. 88 -474. A proposed resolution ordering the annual assessments for the "Parks and Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1" for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1988 and ending June 30, 1989, and fixing a time and place for Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California _ 12._ __ _ May 18, 1988 hearing objections thereto. Staff recommended approval of the resolution. Steven Rueny gave a brief overview of the four resolutions necessary for the annual levying of assessments for the City's two assessment districts. The following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 88 -471, a resolution approving the Engineer's report for "Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1988 and ending June 30, 1989. The voice vote was unanimous. The following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 88 -472, a resolution approving the Engineer's Report for the "Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1" for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1988 and ending June 30, 1989; and approving Resolution No. 88 -473, a resolution ordering the annual assessments for the "Moorpark Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1988 and ending June 30, 1989, and fixing a time and place for hearing objections thereto; and approving Resolution No. 88 -474, a resolution ordering the annual assessments for the "Parks and Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1" for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1988 and ending .Tune 30, 1989, and fixing a time and place for hearing objections thereto. The voice vote was unanimous. 11.H. Consider a report concerning curb, gutter, and sidewalk design for North High Street. Staff recommended that Council give direction as it deemed appropriate. Dennis Delzeit gave a brief overview of this item, recommending Alternative No. 1 which consisted of a 12 foot travel lane with an 8 foot parallel parking lane. Councilmember Brown commented she would like to see an arborist look at the trees to be sure the trees would survive the necessary root trimming. The following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to adopt Alternative No. 1 which consisted of a 12 foot travel lane with an 8 foot parallel parking area; to increase the areas around the trees to allow additional plantings around the trees; and also to direct that Lt. Brown review the proposed alignment of the curb to determine whether or not traffic flow might be inhibited. The voice vote was unanimous. 11.1. Consider a report concern__ Happy _ ,Camp Canyon Channel Improvements at Highway 118. Staff recommended that the City's participation in this project be authorized. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California _ _.13_ _ __. Maw 181_1988 Steven Kueny gave a very brief overview of this item, and the following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to authorize the City's participation in the project as described in Mr. Kueny's report dated May 13, 1988, to: 1) Place a lid on the culvert for approximately 100 feet south of the existing edge of pavement at an estimated cost of $16,000. If the City does not pay for the lid, the County will only construct a 3 -sided culvert that may require substantial modification in the event the City decides to fund it in the future; 2) Pay for approximately 30 feet of box culvert for the area north of the existing edge of pavement to the edge of the ultimate right -of -way at an estimated cost of $24,000. If the City does not agree to this work, the County will construct only typical channel improvements consisting of rip rap; and 3) To further add 25% of Items 1) and 2) above for engineering and related costs at an estimated cost of $10,000, resulting in the City agreeing to participate in the project at an estimated cost of $50,000. The voice vote was unanimous. 11.J. Consider a report regarding "Keep Clear" pavement markings for the intersection of Spring Road and Christian Barrett Drive. Staff recommended that Council give direction as they deemed appropriate. Dennis Delzeit gave a brief overview of this .item. The following motion was heard: MOTION:_ Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to direct the City Manager to install "Beep Clear" pavement markings at the intersection of Spring Road and Christian Barrett Drive. The voice vote was unanimous. 11. K. Consider a request for a Joint Meeting between the City Council and the Parks and Recreation C_ ommission. Staff recommended that the Council consider the suggested topics of discussion, and set a meeting date. Philip Newhouse, Director of Community Services, gave a brief overview of this item. Councilmember Brown stated that Ordinance No. 33, as well as the Council's Rules of Procedure, should be fully reviewed by the Commission, and that several areas of concern stated by the Commission are covered fully in those two documents. Councilmember Harper suggested that a meeting be set; however Council should outline an agenda for that meeting. Councilmember Galloway suggested that the agenda might include a discussion of the tasks which are set before the City rather than focusing on duties and responsibilities and procedure Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California _ 14 _ _ _ _ _ May 18 , 1988 questions which are contained Ordinance No. 33 and Rules of Procedure. The following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to direct that copies of Ordinance No. 33 as well as Council's Rules of Procedure be forwarded to the Commission, and that a meeting would be set with the City Council determining the Agenda for that meeting. The voice vote was unanimous. L. Consider a status report concerning a cost estimate for fencing off Williams Ranch Road at the Edison Easement. Staff recommended that this report be received and filed. Dennis Delzeit gave a staff report dated May 11, 1988, and the following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to appropriate $2,600 from the Gas Tax Fund for this project, and to further direct the City Manager to install a barrier with the appropriate notification to other public agencies and affected residents after the City Engineer and City Attorney confirm there are no additional legal requirements necessary for this action. The roll call vote was unanimous. 12. ORDINANCES: No ordinances were presented for Council consideration. 13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: No future Agenda items were given. 14. CLOSED SESSION: The City Attorney announced that item 14.B., "Litigation concerning Urban West Communities vs. the City of Moorpark", had been covered during Council's special meeting of May 18, 1.988 at 6:00 p.m. and did not need further consideration. The following motion was heard: MOTION: Concilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded a motion to go into Closed Session under items: 14. A. - Personnel; 14. C - Litigation concerning B. T. A. vs. the City of Moorpark; and 14. D - Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1). The voice vote was unanimous. The time of adjournment to Closed Session was 11:36 p.m. All Councilmembers plus Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; and Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development were present for the Closed Session. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California 15 May 18, 1988 The full Council reconvened in Open Session at 12:14 p.m. Cheryl Kane stated there was no action to report from the Closed Session. 15. ADJOURNMENT: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting to 6:00 p.m. on May 25, 1988 with the intent to go into Closed Session from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m, and to reconvene in Open Session to proceed with regular agenda items. ohn Patrick Lane Mayor ATTEST: