HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1988 0601 CC REGMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Moorpark, California June 1, 1988
The Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark,
California was held on June 1, 1988 in the Council Chambers of City
Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
The Meeting was called to order at 7:09 p.m. by Mayor John Lane.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Perez.
3. ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers Eloise Brown, John Galloway, Clint
Harper, Bernardo Perez and Mayor John Lane.
Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City
Attorney; Patrick Richards, Director of Community
Development; Philip Newhouse, Director of Community
Services; Thomas Genovese, Deputy City Manager;
Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer; Sgt. Kathy
Cullins, Sheriff's Department; and Maureen Wall, City
Clerk.
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS_
No proclamations, commendations or special presentations were
made.
5. REORDERING OF. AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
By concensus of the Council, Item 9 -G (Vacation of the
Laurelhurst Easement) was removed from the Agenda.
Upon request of CounclImember Galloway and concensus of the
Council, Item 10 -C (Consider an appointment to the Design
Standards Committee due to the resignation of a committee member)
was relocated and retitled Tterri 1.1-F (Final report of the Design
Standards Committee) .
G. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
G.A. Phyllaglenn Mason, 437 Shasta, requested that the high
school site be treated the same as any other development or
developer, and that it by used in whatever manner is best
for the City. She further, advised that she was against any
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California ? June 1, 1988
park maintenance assessment and felt passage of the Gann
override would more than compensate.
G.B. William Mason,
437
Shasta Avenue, advised
that he agreed
with the comments
of
the previous speaker,
and expressed
concern over
the
48
industrial units being proposed for
Maureen Lane
without
some regulation as
to the type of
businesses that
will
be
allowed occupancy.
Councilmember Galloway directed Staff to develop a report
concerning industrial projects that are constructed adjacent
to residential areas with respect to regulating materials and
processes, and including what options are available and what
guidelines currently exist on this issue.
Councilmember Brown requested that the issue of a business
license tax be added to a future agenda.
6. C. Elaine Freeman, 24005 Ventura Boulevard, Calabasas,
representing Griffin Homes, advised that Griffin Homes has
negotiated with the Mormon Church for the past three years
for a right -of -way for Collins Drive. Because the Church is
concerned for the safety of its school, they are not willing
to dedicate an additional nine feet of right-of-way for a
future southbound lane. She asked the Council to consider
waiving this requirement. With regard to the construction of
Pecan Avenue (condition of Tract 3963) , she advised that the
order of construction has been reversed to accommodate the
safety of school children near the construction area. The
project will be completed after school is recessed for
the summer. Regarding the issue of tract grading, she
advises to avoid unnecessary transporting of heavy equipment
across already - constructed roads or unnecessary expense on
part of the developer.
6.D. Paul Lawrason, 4291 Ambermeadow Street, advised that the
Moorpark Kiwanis is conducting its Charter Night on .June 11,
1988 at the Community Center. He requested that the
Council consider waiving fees for the rental of the facility
for this occasion.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember
Galloway seconded a motion to add Item 11 -G (Consider
waiving of fees for Kiwanis Chsrter Night) to the Agenda.
The voice vote was unanimous.
7. COMMITTEE REPORTS:
Councilmember Brown advised that the Graffitti Committee,
consisting of concerned citizens, is making good progress.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California 3 June 1, 1988
8. CONSENT CALENDAR:
On a motion by Councilmember Harper and seconded by
Councilmember Galloway, the following items were approved by a
unanimous roll call vote of the Council:
8. A. Approval of Warrant Re ister__
- Prepaid Warrant Nos. 6794, 6834, 6836 -6852 $ 32,147.54
- Payable Warrant Nos. 6851 -6921 $575,254.72
8.1). An informational report concerntpK Minor Modification to
amend the parking lot so as to allow a pass through access
from the subject site to the adjacent Chevron Service Station
(PD -966, MASH Associates -. Staff recommended that this
report be received and filed.
8.17. Consider time extensions for various subdivision
Improvements for 16 projects. Staff recommended that the
Mayor be authorized to extend the time for completion of the
subdivision improvements as indicated in the report. Time
extensions were granted for Tracts.
8.G. Consider the acceptance of public improvements and bond
exonerations for Tract No. 3070 -4 (U. S. Condominium) . Staff
recommended that the Coti n.cil accept the public improvements
within Tract No. 3070 -4, include all streets in the City
Street System for maintenance, and authorize the City Clerk
to exonerate relative bonds.
8.1. _Consider a status report_- o_n_M_ onte Vista Nature Park
Staff recommended that this report be received and filed.
8.J. Consider_ a status report_ on the T -bar d_ ropped ceilng and
lighting improvements to the Moorpark Community Center.
Staff recommended that this report be received and filed.
8.K. Consider a status report on th_ a Moorpark Senior Citizen
Center. Staff recommended that this report be received and
filed.
8.L. Consider Storm Drain _Maintenance Program guidelines. Staff
recommended that the City Manager be authorized to
inmplement the storm drain maintenance program as proposed.
B.M. Resolution No. 88 -476_ A resolution amending the speed limit
to 25 m.p.h., and authorizing the posting of speed limit
signs on Williams Ranch Road. Staff recommended the
Resolution be approved.
8.N. Consider a report concerning requested_._ pedestrian crossings
mid -block on Quail Summit _Road. Staff recommended that this
report be received and filed.
The following items were pttllod for individual consideration by
the Council:
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California 4 June 1, 1.988
8.B. Consider approval_ of the Minutes for the regular and special
meetings held on May 18, 1988. Staff recommended the
Minutes be approved.
Councilmember Harper corrected the wording of his motion
concerning the Pardee Storm Drain easement to reflect that
Pardee (not the City) will maltitain the drains for one year.
Councilmember
Galloway clarified
his no vote on the
amendment to
the motion concerning
the appointment
of the
Mayor and a
Councilmember, plus
a representative
of the
owner of the
Mobile Home Park, to meet and
confer
concerning economic hardship cases,
advising that his
no vote
was premised on
the resident's right
to privacy.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember
Perez seconded a motion to approve the Minutes as amended.
The voice vote was unanimous.
8.C. An informational _ r_eport concerning a_Minor M_ odification to
_amend an exterior elevation on a_free standing building so as
to add an -enclosure to the window service area
1PD -890, Bank of _A._Levy) . Staff recommended that Council
receive and file this reporl.
Councilmember Brown advised that some consideration should
be given to enclosing the walk -up window and adding air
conditioning. She suggested the item be continued for two
weeks to allow Staff to carefully study the proposal. and
determine if other alternatives may be available to provide
protection from the elements. Councilmember Galloway
concurred, and further suggested that the project be
considered more than a minor modification. After some
discussion, the following motion was heard.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember
Galloway seconded a motion to direct the Director of
Community Development, to work with the applicant on a minor
modification to accomplish a full enclosure, with roof and
wall materials matching the existing structure. The voice
vote was unanimous.
8.'E. _Consider a report regarding a proposed _contract to _provide
landscape plan review acid compliance ___itispections . Staff
recommended that the Council approve the contract with Wolf
Breiman and raise the fee deposit amount to $600.
Pat Richards, Director of Community Development reviewed
the need to acquire consultant services for landscape plan
review and inspection upon completion of a project. He
suggested that the minimum deposit be raised from $400 to a
range of $600 to $1,200, with the actual deposit being set. at
Staff's discretion.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California June 1, 1988
Councilmember Brown expressed concern that an RFP was not
developed and that other firms had not been considered.
City Manager, Steven Kueny, recommended that Council.
approve a contract with Wolf Brieman for a six month
period, during which time Staff will develop an RFP
and solicit proposals from other firms; allow discre-
tion on the part of Staff, not to exceed $1,000
for the actual deposit; and that the hourly rate be
set at $54.00, to be a 75%-2500 split between the
contractor and the City.
MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember
Perez seconded a motion to approve Staff's proposal for a six
month contract with Wolf Brieman at a rate of $40 per hour,
to be collected at the rate of $54 an hour and split 75 % -25%
between the contractor and the City; that
Staff be directed to prepare and distribute an RFP for
these services to be brought back to the Council within the
six month time period; that. the plan check deposit minimum
be raised from $400 to $500, with a maximum deposit of
$1,000, with the actual deposit to he determined at the
discretion of the Director of Community Development; and
that the City Manager be r uthorizod to execute the contract.
The voice vote was unanimous .
8. H Consider an informational _report of the Moisture Problem
Committee meetings. in the Mountain Meadows Area.
Staff recommended that this report be received and filed.
Councilmember Galloway expressed concern that the reports
to date do not address probable causes of the moisture
problern .
City Engineer, Dennis Dolzeit , responded by advising that
Urban West Communities is commencing detailed tests on the
lots within the problem areas. The tests will be conducted
over the next two weeks, .ind the results of those tests will
be summarized for the Council as soon as completed.
Mr. Delzeit reminded the Council that it was not the
City's function to suggest <ir• make a determination as
to the cause or solution to this problem but rather to
oversee the progress in getting it resolved.
Councilmember Harper expressed concern that since the City
has an immunity with respect to issuing building permits.
The liability might occur- if the problem is a result of
a drainage problem that is being oxneerhate.d by drainage
flowing across public property.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California G
June 1, 1988
Cheryl Kane, City Attorney, advised that the City has an
immunity with respect to issuing hullding permits. The
liability might occur if the problem is a result of a
drainage problem that is being oxacerbated by drainage
flowing across public property.
Mayor Lane directed that Staff report back as soon as
test results are available. The report was then received
and filed.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
9. A. Consider Development Plan Permit Nos. 393 to 404 and Parcel
Map No. LDM -10 (Siegel _& Associates, _ Inch. These
Development Plan Permits are for twelve separate industrial
buildings with DP -393 to DP -396 being 105, 108 square feet of
total building area, and 10-397 to DP -404 being 45,805
square feet of total building area. The buildings will have
office, warehouse, and matitifacturing uses. The applicant is
also requesting approval to re- subdivide three existing
industrial zoned lots into twenty-six industrial lots. The
project is located on the east side of Maureen Lane north of
Los Angeles Avenue. (Continued from April 6, 1986, Ttem
9.B; the Public Hearing w.is still open on this item.)
Duane Murretta of Sanchez Talarico presented an overview
and summary of Council actions to date on this item.
Mayor Lane opened the Public Hearing.
9.A.1. Nick Brown, 8921) Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills
(West America Construction) addressed the Council.
concerning his letter to the Council dated
May 24, 1988 outlining his concerns regarding
the Conitions of /Approval for LDM -10, T)P -393 to
396 and DP -397 i o 404.
and DP -397 to 401.
9.A.2. Ernest Siracusa, 5743 Corsa Avenue, #202, Westlake
Village, representing the Siracusa Company,
advised he was prepared to answer any
questions from the C'rnrncil concerning survey of
Industrial uses within the City.
9. A.3. Murray Siegel, 5101 Douglas Fir Road, that alternate
elevations had been submitted for the project; that
he was concern�cl about any potential park fee.; and
that items submitted for the zone clearance are a
duplication of tho :items submitted of the to the
Building & Safety Department, and felt these,
reviews should he dnne simultaneously.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California 7 June 1, 1988
AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, Mayor Lane closed the public
hearing when no one else wished to !:pP.Ak .
Upon request of Councitmember Harper, Staff reviewed each
item in the May 24 letter submitted by West America
Construction Corporation, addressing concerns expressed by
the proponent and the corresponding position of
Staff
City Manager, Steven Kueny, recommended that the Council
consider requiring this developer to fund a study to create
the criteria that would be used for establishing traffic
mitigation fees for all industrial projects. The study could
be performed by the City Engineer and be funded
by a per- square -foot charge to the developer. If the study
resulted in a monetary requirement on the developer,
the amount of the up -front deposit for the study would
be credited towards that. amount .
By consensus, the Council concurred with the recommendation
of the City Manager, to require the developer to fund a
study to determine traffic mitigation fee criteria, and that
the developer receive a credit for the amount funded toward
any resultant monetary requirement.
AT THIS POINT IN THE MEE'T'ING, the Council recessed, the time
being 8:55 p.m. At the hour of 9:08 p.m., the full Council reconvened.
Regarding the proponent's request to have Building and
Safety and City Staff simii.ltaneously review their plans, and
upon questions of the Council, Mr. Pat Richards, Director of
Planning and Development:, advised that separate review
provides a better control of the project by the City. Most
importantly, the City wants control of the project at the
time of occupancy in order to insure that all conditions have
been met.
By concensus of the Council, the City Attorney was directed
to develop a resolution for the Council's consideration to
establish the condition that developers be required to pay
traffic mitigation fees, the criteria of which will be
determined by the impending stiidy.
By concensus of the Council, Staff was directed to work with
the developer regarding the installation of the meandering
sidewalks, and to report back to the Council when the
resolution is presented for approval.
Councilmember Galloway questioned whether the City has
specific zoning to exclude hazardous materials adjacent to
residential areas. Mr. Richards advised that this is not a
part of the existing ordinance.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California t; June 1, 1988
After discussion by Council, Staff was directed to review the
current uses permitted in industrial zones; to review the
possibility of a business license fee in order to control
permitted uses; and to include this as an agenda item for the
Council's consideration in the future.
Upon questioning by Council, the City Manager advised that
Griffin Homes had paid $1.0,000 to Commuter Computer,
however, he recommended that the funds stay in the City and
perhaps $20,000 would be appropriate to fund a study to
establish the criteria for traffic mitigation fees.
Councilmember Galloway advised that he was not in favor of
collecting $20,000 to fund a study, but felt it should be
used to directly address existing traffic issues within the
City and to solve existing problems.
By concensus of the Council, with Councilmember Galloway
dissenting, it was determined to establish a traffic
mitigation fee and to require the applicant to fund a study
to develop the criteria for this fee.
_MOTION:_ Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember
Galloway seconded a motion to direct that: 1.) Staff draft a
resolution setting forth project conditions for the Council's
consideration; 2) the Director of Community Development to
approve color and elevations and materials on the project; 3)
$70,000 will be collected once from the applicant to fund 1/2
the cost of the traffic signal at the intersection of Maureen
Lane and Los Angeles Avenue, 4) the sidewalk issue,
Including timing, design, placement., etc., will be discussed
between Staff and the applicant prior to the Council's
consideration of the conditioning; `i) the traffic
Transportation System Management. Study will be conducted
by the City Engineer, funds to be collected will be
recommended by Staff; 6) the Applicant: is required to
participate in park dedication or in -lieu fees as may be set
and art -in- public places requirements. rho motion carried by
unanimous voice vote.
Councilmember Galloway advised that he objected to collecting
funds for the purpose of conducting a study, but wanted the
funds to address traffic is. ^,ties .
By Council concensus, Staff was directed to present a
recommendation to the Council for traffic system managment.
9. B. A presentation by the Planning Center of the _ Downtown
Plan. Staff recommended that the Council consider the draft
plan, amend the contract to allow for at.tendRnee at future
meetings, direct the Planning Commission to forward their
recommendations on the draft plan to the City Council and
direct staff further as dec�ined appropriate.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California 9
June 1, 1988
Director of Community Development, Pat Richards, advised
the Council that this matter is still pending before the
Planning Commission, and that representatives of The
Planning Center will give tin overview of the plan.
Michael Nihan, Project Manager (The Planning Center)
addressed the Council, highlighting the study and
recommendations. lie advised that the study is intended to be
a comprehensive vision statement or guidance document that
begins the revitalization process and results in
recommendations for land use /zoning, architectural themes,
and implementation procediir•es.
The Public Hearing was oprnecl , and then closed when no one
wished to speak.
Councilmembers expressed concern that the level of detail in
the study must be refined to the point that it becomes a
workable document, something that can be handed to people
when they begin to plan their projects.The following motion
was heard:
MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember
Galloway seconded a motion to request the Planning Commission to
finalize the Downtown Study; to formulate recommendations,
specifically for implementation of the Study; and that the
contract not be extended at this time. The voice vote was
unanimous.
9. C. Consideration of proposed assessments for "_Moorpark Lighting
and Landscaping_Maintenance Assessment District No.
AD -84 -2 "for the fiscal ,y(-,.ar commencing July 1, 1988 and
ending June 30, 1989, and consideration of Resolution No.
88 -_, a resolution confirming the assessment for fisal year
1988/89.
City Manager made several corrections and clarifications to
the report which had previously been transmitted to the
Council from the City Engineer. He further recommended
that this item be continued until adoption of the 1988 -89
Budget.
Mayor Lane opened the public hearing. No persons were
present desiring to speak 1)n thi-, item.
MOTION: Councilmember Bro,,,vn moved and Councilmember
Harper seconded a motion to continue this item until June 15,
1.988, with the public hearing to remain open and be
continued at that time.
9.D. Consideration_ of proposed assessments for "Parks Maintenance
Assessment _ Distri_ct No. AD -85 -1" for the fiscal year
commencing July 1, 1988 and ending .1>>ne 30, 1989, and
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California t June 1, 1988
consideration of Resolution No. 88 -, a resolution confirming
the assessment for fiscal year 1988/89.
City Manager reviewed and clarified several items in the City
Engineer's Report previously distribute(]. in response to a
question by Mayor Lane, City Manager advised that if
"Measure C" (Gann) passes, at the June 7, 1988 election the
City could budget for park maintenance from the General
Fund, but it would leave little, if any, surplus. Mayor Lane
opened the public hearing. No speakers were present.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember
Brown seconded a motion to continue this item until .Tune 15,
1988, with the public hearing to remain open and be
continued at that time.
Councilmember Galloway urged the Council to vote on this
Item before the general election on June 7th. He advised
that he had numerous calls from citizens desiring to know the
Council's position on this item before deciding to vote for
or against "Measure C".
Discussion followed regarding the need to have more data
before a vote is taken; and the position that if an
assessment district fee is not needed it will not be
supported, regardless of the outcome on "Measure C ".
Councilmember Galloway continued to urge the Council to vote
on this item.
Mayor Lane called for the vote. The Motion carried, with
Councilmember Galloway dissenting.
9. E. Appeal No. 4 of a Planning Commission _decision_ by U. S_
Sprint__ Network Route _Development Randall F. M_ urpby).
U.S. Sprint Communications Network Route Development
proposes to install an underground fiber optic communication
cable directly within the Southern Pacific Railroad
right -of -way through the city of Moorpark.
Council waived Staff's report Mayor Lane opened the public
hearin g.
9.E.1. Randall Murphy, 973 E. Front, Ventura, CA,
representing U.S. Sprint, advised the Council that the
cable will be totally buried, approximately 24' from the
centerline of the railroad track. There will be no
evidence of the cable once it is in place, and a parking
lot constructed over it world not be a problem. The
location of the cable was determined. by the railroad
company and not Ii. S Sprini .
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California 11
In reply to Councilmember
Murphy advised that he
imposed by the Planning
application for an industrial
be waived.
June 1, 1988
Harper's question, Mr.
felt that the requirement
Commission to process an
Planned Development. should
Director of Community Development advised that the
issues are depth, and construction conditions
(tunneling, blocking roads during construction, etc. ) .
The Planning Commission felt. the Industrial Planned
Development process would he the best way to address
these concerns.
The Council discussed the possibility of entering into
an agreement with U. S. Sprint to address the issues of
depth, requirement to move cable at City's request, and
construction constraints.
Mayor Lane closed the Public Hearing when no one else
wished to speak.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember
Perez seconded a motion to direct Staff to develop a proposed
agreement for Council's approval between the City and U.S.
Sprint addressing these issues: 1.) depth of the cable; 2)
future use of land; 3) need to move installation if build out
would occur; 4) working hours; 5) conditions normally
applicable to a conditional use permit CUP; and 6) to
expedite the agreement as quickly as possible.
City Attorney, Cheryl. Kane, cautioned the Council to
continue the public hearing to a date certain and direct
Staff to negotiate a contract with U.S. Sprint. This
will retain control of the project if an agreement
cannot be negotiated.
MOTION WITHDRAWN: Councilmember Brown withdrew
her motion and Councilmember Perez withdrew his second.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember
Perez seconded a motion to continue the public hearing until
June 1.5, 1988, by which time the Director of Community
Development will have ne.gotialed an agreement
for consideration by the Council. . The voice vote was
unanimous.
9. F. Revision_ to___the City's _Bulldin� and Safety Fee Schedule_
Consider a report regarding the need to revise the City's
current Building and Safety Fee Schedule. Staff
recommended that the Council adopt the revised Ventura
County Building and Safety Foe Schedule.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California 12 June 1, 1988
Director of Community Development, Pat Richards, advised
the Council that the County of Ventura has provided Building
and Safety Services to the City since it's incorporation. As
of June 30, 1988, the County is discontinuing this service.
In the past, the City has relied upon the County's fee
schedule, which has recently been increased. It is,
therefore necessary for the City to adjust its fees
accordingly. In addition to the 23% increase recommended in
the Staff Report, Staff is requesting another 20% increase on
all types of building permits.
Mayor Lane opened the public }rearing. No speakers were
present. Mayor Lane closed the public hearing.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Counellmember
Brown seconded a motion to approve the revised fee
schedule as recommended by Staff, by adopting Resolution
No. 88-477.
Mr. Richards clarified that Staff is requesting a 20%
increase over the County's 23% increase.
AMENDMENT: Councilmember Harper amended his motion
and Councilmember Brown concurred, to include an
additional 20% on the Staff's written fee schedule report,
for a total increase of 43V
Mr. Richards advised that the additional increase is
necessary to cover the new Building & Safety Service;
staff administrative cost for processing; and to cover a
certain percentage of the cost being borne primarily with
increase in zoning clearances and condition compliances.
This voice vote on the motion was unanimous.
10. COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS
Councilmember Brown commented that the Fire Department is using
Its fire truck to make inspections, such as fire clearances, etc.
which leaves the station without a fire engine. She requested
Staff to check into this and determine why this is happening.
Councilmember Brown requested that the City's
specifications /conditions for development include the use of
graffetti -proof paint.
Councilmember Galloway questioned what the City Attorney
determined regarding leash laws. City Attorney, Cheryl Kane,
advised that the "Pooper- Scooper" law requires that pet owners
clean up on public and private properties. Implementation of such
a law within the City would require iho adoption of an ordinance.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California 13 June 1, 1988
Councilmember Galloway questioned that, under the Gann issue, if
money is to be returned, to whom or where is It to be returned.
City Manager advised that it would he the Council's discretion to
reduce certain fees, tax bills or assessments or provide refunds.
Mayor Lane related a concern that residents feel they do not have
a method for filing complaints against. City Staff. He directed
that Staff outline a process whereby complaints against Staff can
be made.
Mayor Lane requested Staff to take the appropriate steps to place
a a question concerning a directly elected Mayor on the November,
1988 ballot.
10.A. Consider a request for a meeting _ with the Camrosa Water
District.
The Council directed that Staff schedule a meeting between
the Camrosa Water District representatives and Mayor Lane
and Mayor Pro Tem Brown.
11. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS:
11.A. Consider a report_ from the Park_ s and _Recreation
Commission's 4th of_ Jul,} Ad Hoc _Committee. Staff
Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate.
This item was deferred to a future agenda.
11.B. Consider a request from Moorpark Unified School District
to extend the time for _Griffin Homes (Tract No. 3963) to
complete required roadwork the of the school
ear. Staff recommended that the request of the School
District be approved.
Councilmember Brown noted that the request from the School
District was made from their Staff to City Staff, not from
their Board to the Council. Therefore, it was not a formal
request. Councilmember Galloway concurred.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez
seconded a motion to approve the request of the School District
for a time extension for the completion of Pecan Avenue to August
1, 1988. The voice vote was unanimous.
11.C. Consider waiving certain conditions of Tract_ No. 3963
(Griffin) concerning__ Collins Drive right-of -way to allow
timely completion of the roadway- Staff recommended that the
Council waive the 9 foot right -of -way dedication, that the
developer construct. the southbound lane of Collins Drive as
recommended by the City Engineer, and require that Collins
Drive be completed by September 1, 1988.
City Engineer, Dennis Delzeit , advised that the roadway
would be adequate without the additional 9 feet of
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California 14 June 1, 1988
right -of -way, but this would a require" no parking zone" in
front of the Mormon Church.
M_OTION:_ Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember
Brown seconded a motion to approve Staff's recommendation to
waive the 9 foot right -of -way dedication, to have developer
construct the southbound lane of Collins Drive as
recommended by the City Engineer, and to require that
Collins Drive be completed by September 1, 1988. The voice
vote was unanimous.
11.D. Consider a recommendation from the Council's Ad Hoc
Committee regarding the award of a contract for Building_ and
Safety and /or City Enlineering—Services. Staff recommended
that the Council give direction as deemed appropriate.
Councilmember Brown recommended that the award for
Building and Safety Services be given to Abbott & Associates.
By concensus of the Cotanell with the appropriate retainer
and changes to percentages as discussed and in relation to
the City's Building and safety fees; with final language to
be approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. The
agreement would begin in .dune.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember
Brown seconded a motion to direct that the Manager and Ad
Hoc Committee continue to negotiate with WUIdan for City
Engineering services. The voice vote was unanimous.
11. E. _Consider a report. regarding Section 5 of Resolution No.
87 -421 Residential Development Management System) as it
relates to __grading_ limits within residential tracts. Staff
recommended that the Council give direction as it deemed
appropriate.
Council directed that this item be deferred, and placed as
the second item on the Agenda for the Adjourned Meeting of
June 8, 1988.
11. F. Consider an appointment to the Design Standards
Committee due to the resignation of a committee member.
No action was taken on this item.
11.G. Moorpark Kiwanis Cha.i•ter Night.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and
Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to waive the
rental fee for the Community Center for the Moorpark
Kiwanis charter meeting. The voice vote was unanimous.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California 15 June 1, 1988
12. ORDINANCES:
No ordinances were presented.
13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
Councilmember Harper suggested that Staff contact other
cities regarding information on re- cycling waste and
"ecolo- loans" for a presentation to the Council. Council
concurred with this suggestion.
Staff was directed to agendize Business Licenses and Art in
Public Places.
15. ADJOURNMENT:.
MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember
Brown seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at the hour
of 12 :04 a.m. until June 8, 1.988 at 6:00 p.m. The voice vote
was unanimous.
(gzaw� IIA-e',l, .
Mayor
Attest