HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1988 0713 CC ADJMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Moorpark, California
July 13. 1988
The adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California
was held on July 13, 1988, in the Council Chambers of City Hall located at 799
Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order at 6:04 p.m. by Mayor John Patrick
Lane.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance was continued to a time later in the meeting,
since it was the intent of Council to discuss Closed Session matters at
this time.
3. ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers Eloise Brown, John Galloway, Clint
Harper, Bernardo Perez and Mayor John Patrick Lane.
Steven Kueny, City Manager; and Cheryl Kane, City
Attorney.
14. CLOSED
SESSION:
A.
Potential litigation
__pursuant to Government _ Code Section
54956.9(b)(1).
B.
Potential litigation
_pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9Cc).
C.
Litigation concerning__Urban
West Communities versus_ the City of
Moorpark.
D.
Litigation concerning_
B.I.A. versus the Cif of_Moorpark.
E.
Personnel.
F.
Negotiations concerning the high school site.
G.
Litigation _concerni nq
Boeth i ng versus the Ci ty__of Moor ark.
H.
Litigation concerning ...
the_City of Moorpark versus Boething.
MOTION: Councilmember
Brown moved and Councilmember Perez
seconded a motion to
go into Closed Session to discuss Item
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpaark,California 2 1988
— - -- —
July
_J 3 ,
14. C. The voice vote was unanimous. The time of adjournment
was 6:05 p.m.
At 7:08 p.m. the full Council reconvened in Open Session, and
the City Attorney stated there was no action to report.
AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, the Council recessed, the time being 7:10 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was reconvened at 7:20 p.m. by Mayor John Patrick Lane.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Perez.
3. ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers Eloise Brown, John Galloway, Clint
Harper, Bernardo Perez, and Mayor John Patrick Lane.
Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney;
Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development; Lt.
Mike Brown, Sheriff's Department; Dennis Delzeit, City
Engineer; Philip Newhouse, Director of Community
Services; and Maureen W. Wall, City Clerk.
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS,_AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
None were presented.
5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO,- -THE AGENDA:
MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember Brown seconded
a motion to add an item to the agenda concerning Art in Public Places,
since a need to take action arose subsequent to the posting of the
agenda. The voice vote was unanimous. The matter became Item 11.I. on
the agenda.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a
motion to add an item to the agenda concerning Circus D'Carlo, since a
need to take action arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda. The
voice vote was unanimous. The matter hpcame Item 11.J. on the agenda.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
A. Mrs. Anna Bell Sessler, 6061 Gabbert Road, asked the City
Council to place the retention of the high school site on a
future ballot.
B. Mrs. Teresa A. Cortes, 1095 Walnut Canyon Road, reported Blue
Star Ready Mix had made an application concerning a Conditional
Use Permit to the County of Ventura. She asked the City Council
to take into consideration the traffic impacts which this would
cause. The impacts were especially critical since the City
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark California _ 3 _July 13, 1988
could not improve the roadway as it is a State highway. She
suggested Blue Star might be willing to help improve the
roadway.
7. COMMITTEE REPORTS:
Councilmember Brown reported she had attended a meeting with Southern
California Edison concerning the frequent power outages in the
community.
Councilmember Harper reported he had attended a meeting concerning
street sweeping.
8. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Nothing was presented on the Consent Calendar.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
C. Consider an amendment to the Moorpark Municipal Code to provide
requirements for Political (Campaign) signs. Staff recommended
Council direct staff as deemed appropriate
By consensus of Council, this item will be heard later in the
meeting.
D. Draft Comprehensive Planning Or A proposal to consider
revising the City's General Plan amendment process and a_listino
of required ordinance_adoptions on_ selected subjects.
By consensus of Council, this matter will be heard later in the
meeting.
10. COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS:
A. Consider rotation of appointment to the Highway _118 Strategy
rnmmittna
By consensus of Council, Councilmember Perez was appointed to
serve with Councilmember Harper on the committee through August.
B. Councilmember Brown reported the trees on the easterly side of
Spring Road next to the Chevron Station needed attention. They
appeared to be damaged.
11. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS:
A. Consider a report conce_rning_a draft tree preservation ordinance
presented by the Ad Hoc Tree Preservation Committee, and another
draft tree preservation ordinance. Staff recommended Council
direct staff as deemed appropriate.
There was no staff report prepared or given. Councilmember
Galloway outlined his report of the matter dated June 22, 1988.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California _ 4 _ _ July 13, 1988
MOTION: Councilmember Lane moved and Councilmember Galloway
seconded a motion to direct staff to return with a draft
ordinance for Council's consideration. The voice vote was
unanimous.
B. Consider the placement of a traffic device at the pedestrian
crossing located at Moorpark Avenue and Second Street. Staff
recommended Council direct staff as deemed appropriate.
No staff report was prepared or given. This matter was
continued to July 20, 1988.
C. Consider a draft Request for Proposal (RFP) to update the City's
Land Use and Circulation Elements of the General Plan_. Staff
recommended Council approve the draft RFP and direct staff to
send it to consultant firms.
By consensus of Council, this matter will be considered later in
the meeting.
D. Consider a report concerninq_ the regulation of campaign
financing /spending. Staff recommended Council direct staff as
deemed appropriate.
Cheryl Kane, City Attorney, gave a brief overview of how the
City could implement such an ordinance. Councilmember Harper
suggested the City Attorney review a model previously seen by
the Council in light of newly enacted Proposition 73.
Councilmember Brown asked about an ordinance which would set a
limit on spending by a certain amount per each registered voter.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown
seconded a motion to direct the City Attorney to prepare a draft
ordinance containing a spending limit measure which is
consistent with Proposition 73, sets a $.20 per registered voter
spending limit, and with an additional reporting period of
approximately one week prior to the election. The voice vote
was unanimous.
E. Consider a report regard ip_q_._s ht distance at the corners of
Spring Road and Roberts, Spring Road and Second Street. Staff
recommended Council direct staff as deemed appropriate.
Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer, gave the staff report dated June
30, 1988. By consensus of Council, Councilmember Galloway and
Mayor Lane will meet with the residents and see if it is
feasible to remove the wall and build a new one at City expense.
BY CONSENSUS OF COUNCIL, Item 11.I. was heard at this point in the meeting.
Art in Public Places Condition app lied to DP -393 to 396.
Councilmember Galloway presented his suggestion that the
applicant be charged $100 per 1,000 square feet for Art in
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California 5
Public Places, and that those funds be placed in an Art in
Public Places Fund. This would apply only to this project.
MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember Harper
seconded a motion to direct staff to acquire a letter from the
applicant stating his agreement, with the Director of Community
Development and the City Manager to re -draft the condition and
bring this matter back to the City Council in the form of a
proposed resolution. The voice vote was unanimous.
11. J. Consideration of a circus event - Circus D'Carlo.
Steven Kueny gave a brief overview of the staff report dated
July 13, 1988. The Council suspended its Rules of Procedure by
consensus to allow Mr. Bill Rice of Circus D'Carlo to address
the Council. Mr. Rice indicated to Council his circus had spent
$1,000 just to get the circus to town, and would need to spend
additional money for advertising costs.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez
seconded a motion to approve the contract and staff recommended
conditions as presented, except to waive the advance or regular
ticket sales percentage which was to be payable to the City.
The voice vote was unanimous.
AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, Council considered Closed Session items.
14. CLOSED SESSION:
A. Potential litigation_ pursuant to Government Code — Section
MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember Brown
seconded a motion to go into Closed Session to discuss Items
14.A., 14.C. and 14.0. The voice vote was unanimous. The time
of adjournment was 8:30 p.m.
54956.9Ab 1).
B.
Potential litigation
to Government _ Code Section
54956_90 .
_pursuant
C.
Litigation concerninq
— - --
Urban West
Communities versus the City of
— - -- - - - -
Moorpark.
D.
Litigation concerning
B.I.A. versus the _Ci_ty _of_ Moo�ark.
E.
Personnel.
F.
Neqotiations concerning_
the high
school site.
G.
Litigation concerninq_Boethinq
versus
the City of Moorpark.
H.
Litigation concerning
the City of
Moorkark_v_ersus Boething.
MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember Brown
seconded a motion to go into Closed Session to discuss Items
14.A., 14.C. and 14.0. The voice vote was unanimous. The time
of adjournment was 8:30 p.m.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California _ _ _ 6 _ _ July__ 13, 1988
At 10:33 p.m., the full Council reconvened. The City Manager
stated there was no action to report out of Closed Session.
AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, Council considered Item 11.H.
11. H. Consider a potential settlement concerning Urban West
Communities and UWC- Moorpark Investors versus the City of
Moorpark. Staff recommended Council direct staff as deemed
appropriate.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Perez
seconded a motion to approve the Settlement Agreement and
authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement on behalf of the City.
During Council's discussion of the motion, Councilmember Harper
asked what fund the Tierra Rejada Road improvements
(reimbursement), plus the 15% administrative fee, and the 8%
interest would come from. Staff responded money could be taken
from the proposed city -wide Area of Contribution, or the Gas Tax
Fund or the General Fund Reserve. Mayor Lane commented he felt
the agreement affords quite a bit in the way of city -wide
benefits. Councilmember Brown felt there would probably be a
six year period of time prior to money being paid.
Councilmember Perez commented much discussion had been given to
this item. The source of funds will be resolved. He felt the
agreement was a good one. Councilmember Galloway cautioned the
Council to consider the obligation the City would be taking on.
The motion was approved with Councilmembers Harper and Galloway
voting no. Councilmember Harper stated his objection was solely
based on the lack of a clear reimbursement mechanism on the road
improvement fund in the agreement. Mayor Lane commented he felt
the road needed to be built as soon as possible, due to the
level of service on the road. Councilmember Galloway commented
his objection was in regards to the provision on the road
reimbursement costs and interest.
AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, Council considered Items 9.C. and 9.D.
9. C. Consider an amendment to the Moorpark Municipal Code to provide
requirements for Political (Campai n sites. Staff recommended
Council direct staff as deemed appropriate.
Patrick Richards, Director, of Community Development, gave an
overview of the resolution adopted by the Planning Commission.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper, moved and Councilmember Brown
seconded a motion to approve the County revised ordinance except
change the maximum size of the political /campaign signs from 32
square feet to 16 square feet. The motion was approved with
Mayor Lane voting no.
Mayor Lane commented the suggested ordinance appeared to allow
homeowners to put up 16 square foot signs in their front yards.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California 7 . July! 13, 1988
By consensus of Council, a draft ordinance is to be brought to
the Council for consideration.
9. D. Draft Comprehensive Planning Ordinance. A proposal to consider
revising the City's General Plan amendment process and a listing
of required ordinance adopt ons on selected subjects
Patrick Richards gave an overview of this item. By consensus of
Council, the matter was continued to July 20, 1988.
AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, Council considered Item 11.C. and 11.F.
11. C. Consider a draft Request for Proposal (RFP) to update the City's
Land Use and Circulation Elements of the General Plan. Staff
recommended Council approve the draft RFP and direct staff to
send it to consultant firms.
Patrick Richards gave an overview of this item. Councilmember
Galloway commented he considered there was no direct reference
of access to Happy Camp Park in the area of the document
relating to circulation. Such a reference was to be added to
the document by consensus of the Council. Consideration of this
item was continued to July 2.0, 1988.
11. F. Consider a report regarding _the proposal by Blue Star Ready Mix
to extend their existing Conditional Use Permit and add an
asphalt batch plant. Staff recommended Council receive and file
the report and direct staff as deemed appropriate.
Patrick Richards gave an overview of this item.
MOTION: Councilmember Galloway moved and Councilmember Harper
seconded a motion to: 1) receive and file the report with staff
to keep current on this issue; 2) a second letter is to be sent
to the County stating it is the Council's opinion that an E.I.R.
should be required, ask that the City be informed of the E.I.R.
review process, and request: traffic impacts and noise problems
be considered; and 3) comment that it had been one and one -half
years since the original application was filed, and still there
is no complete application. The voice vote was unanimous.
12. ORDINANCES:
None were presented.
13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
Council asked that the following items be placed on future agendas:
Redevelopment Agency business, overcrowding in the downtown area, rate
structures and cable television franchises in light of the proposed
Gallegly bill, and the Casey Road high school site.
15. ADJOURNMENT:
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California 8 July__13, 1988
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Galloway seconded
a motion to adjourn the meeting to 6:00 p.m. on July 20, 1988 with the
intent to discuss Closed Session matters at 6:00 p.m., and to meet in
Open Session at 7:00 p.m. The voice vote was unanimous.
The time of adjournment was 12:27 a.m.
Me r-
ATTEST: