Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1990 0725 CC SPCMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California July 25, 1990 A Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California was held on July 25, 1990 in the Council Chambers of City Hall of said City, Located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Perez called the meeting to order at 6:25 p.m. Present were all Councilmembers; Steven Kueny, City Manager; and Cheryl Kane, City Attorney. MOTION: Councilmember Lawrason moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to adjourn to Closed Session for a discussion of the following: A. Personnel. B. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1). C. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c). D. Litigation concerning City of Moorpark vs. Moorpark Unified School District. E. Litigation concerning Moorpark Unified School District vs. City of Moorpark. F. Litigation concerning Ventura County Community College District vs. City of Moorpark. G. Litigation concerning the County of Ventura vs. City of Moorpark. H. Negotiations for Real Property on the North Side of Tierra Rejada Road East of Spring Road (Pacifica Corp.) pursuant to Government Code Section 54945.8. I. Litigation concerning the Moorpark Mosquito Abatement District vs. City of Moorpark. J. Litigation concerning Colonial Mortgage vs. City of Moorpark. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 July 25, 1990 K. Negotiations for Real Property for portion of Moorpark College (Ventura County Community College District) pursuant to Government Code Section 54945.8. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Present in Closed Session were all Councilmembers; Steven Kueny, City Manager; and Cheryl Kane, City Attorney. The Council reconvened into Open Session at 6:58 p.m. Mr. Kueny stated there was no action to report out of Closed Session and only items B, F, I, J, as listed above had been discussed. AT THIS POINT in the meeting a recess was declared. The Council reconvened into Open Session at 7:20 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The pledge of allegiance was led by Crystal Zemont. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Brown, Harper, Lawrason, Montgomery, and Mayor Perez. Steven Kueny, City Manager; Richard Hare, Deputy City Manager; Pat Richards, Community Development Director; Susan Cauldwell, Assistant to the City Manager; John Knipe, City Engineer; Lt. Rodriguez, Sheriff's Department; Ken Gilbert, Public Works Director; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; Paul Porter, Senior Planner; Lillian Kellerman, City Clerk; and Dorothy Vandaveer, Deputy City Clerk. 4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: A. Presentation of a 1990 Fair Poster from the 31st District Agricultural Association. This item was continued to August 1, 1990. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 3 July 25, 1990 5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: Mayor Perez noted that an item concerning Malathion Spraying in the City had been added as an amendment to the initial Special Meeting Notice and was posted. 6. PUBLIC COMMENT: Jim Hartley, 5950 Gabbert Road, suggested that training be provided to citizens for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and first aid. He indicated this training might do as much to benefit the citizens as trying to reduce the ambulance response time. Tom Thompson, 12623 Hillside Drive, requested that the City Council adopt items 8.D., Peach Hill Road Extension Striping, and 8.H., the approval of RPD 89 -3, so the Presbyterian Church can proceed with the plans for their building. Marcos Vargas, Executive Director of El Concilio, located 526 N. 127th Street, Santa Paula, thanked the City Council for taking the initiative to address the issue of teen violence in the City and requested that they circulate a Request for Proposal (RFP) for services needed in the community before making any decisions on programs to be implemented. John Etter, 2536 N. Marilyn Street, Simi Valley, requested the City Council's support for the Rim of the Valley Trail System. Cheryl Carillo, of the Simi Valley /Moorpark Board of Realtors, located at 2080 Winifred Street, Simi Valley, asked the City Council to be well - informed before lending support to the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Master Plan. Rorie Skei, representing the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, 3700 Solstice Canyon, Malibu, appealed to the City Council for their support of the Rim of the Valley Trail System. Jerry Thompson, 791 Wishard Avenue, Simi Valley, requested support for the Rim of the Valley Trail System because these corridors must be established to preserve regional wildlife. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 4 July 25, 1990 Michael Berger, 1025 Calle Pecos, Thousand Oaks, CA, requested support for the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Master Plan. He stated that the field trips for school children to mountain habitats are a worthwhile benefit of the plan. Jan Hinkston, 8657 Valley Flores Drive, spoke as Founder of the Santa Susana Mountain Parks Association. She stated that the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy is an efficient organization and deserves the support being requested. Albert L. Rosen, 3575 Texas Avenue, Simi Valley, presented several handouts to the City Council regarding the Rim of the Valley Master Plan and suggested that their support of the project would be well- founded. Pete Peters, 7155 Walnut Canyon Road, stated that some of the property owners want to donate about ten feet on each side of their land to provide a corridor for wildlife. David C. Tucker, 13844 Christian Barrett Drive, spoke in favor of the Rim of the Valley Master Plan. 7. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Councilmember Harper reported on a meeting with Pruner Ambulance held this afternoon. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR: (Roll Call Vote) MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to pull items 8.A.- Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of June 20, 1990, 8.D., 8.L., and 8.N., from the Consent Calendar and to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. A. Consider Approval of Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting of May 30, 1990. Consider Approval of Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting of June 6, 1990. Consider Approval of Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting of June 20, 1990. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 5 B. Warrant Register. 1989/90 Manual Warrants Warrants 1990/91 Manual Warrants July 25, 1990 12078 $ 3,770.44 12087-12090,12092 - 12093,12095,12097, 12098- 12101,12103, 12104,12106,12108, 12111,12112,12115, 12117-12123,12125 - 12128,12130- 12133, 12135-12139,12141 - 12143, 12147 - 12150, 12153-12157,12159 - 12165 $128,603.36 11987 - 11193,12076, 12077, 12079 $65,555.00 Warrants 12091,12094,12096, 12102,12105,12107, 12109,12110,12113, 12114,12116,12124, 12129,12134,12140, 12144 - 12146,12151, 12152,12158,12166 $5,979.59 C. Consider Closing City Hall on Friday, August 3 at 2 p.m. for Staff Preparation for Carpet Cleaning. Staff Recommendation: Approve closing City Hall at 2 p.m. on August 3, 1990. E. Consider IPD 88 -1 Minor Modification No. 1 (Horowitz) Request for Outside Storage of 240 Gallon Waste Oil Receptacle and Assorted Parts and Tools. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file. F. Consider RPD 1070 Minor Modification No. 2 (Urban West Communities) Request for Modification to Exterior Elevations of Single - Family Homes in Deauville Tract. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file. G. Consider DP 290 Minor Modification No. 3 (Litton) Request to Install A 10x8 -Foot Shed for Six Months to House a Laser Used for Atmospheric Testing. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 6 July 25, 1990 H. Consider Residential Planned Development No. 89 -3 to Construct a 23.161 Square Foot Church Facility (Presbyterian Church). Staff Recommendation: Approval of Resolutions 90 -699 and 90 -700 and conditions of approval. (Con't 9.C. from 7/11/90) I. Consider Permit to Enter and Construct: Authorizing CALTRANS to Construct Drainage Improvements for Freeway Connector Project. Staff Recommendation: Approve permit and authorize Mayor to sign. J. Consider Working Agreement Between the Ventura County Resources Conservation District and the City to Perform Landscape Water Audits. Staff Recommendation: Approve agreement. K. Consider Purchasing Volleyball Set. Staff Recommendation: Approve purchase of volleyball set. M. Consider General Plan and Sphere of Influence Study_ Update - LAFCO Request. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff to invite LAFCO's Executive Officer to the next public workshop regarding the General Plan and Sphere of Influence Study Update so as to make a presentation. The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for individual consideration. Consider Approval of Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of June 20 1990 Councilmember Montgomery noted that the maker and second were missing from page nine of Item 11.E. BY CONSENSUS: By consensus the Council determined to continue this item to the August 1, 1990 Council meeting. D. Consider Peach Hill Road Extension Striping. Staff Recommendation: Select a specific striping pattern for implementation until Carlsberg develops, after which striping alternatives can be re- evaluated. In response to Councilmember Lawrason, Mr. Kueny clarified that alternative B, as outlined in the staff report, was recommended by the City Engineer. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 7 July 25, 1990 MOTION: Councilmember Lawrason moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to approve the staff recommendation that alternative striping pattern "B" as contained in the staff report be selected for implementation until such time as the Carlsberg Development occurs. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. L. Consider Police Department's Report - Independence Day Festivities. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file. Councilmember Lawrason commended the Police Department on their handling of the Fourth of July Celebrations. MOTION: Councilmember Lawrason moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to approve the staff recommendation to receive and file the report. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. N. Consider Acceptance of Improvements and Exoneration of Bonds for Tracts 4140, 4141, and 4142 (UWC). Staff Recommendation: Accept the street and storm drain improvements and authorize the City Clerk to exonerate the bonds. Councilmember Harper commented that the slope along Tierra Rejada on the South side of the street had unhealthy looking vegetation. Mr. Kueny suggested going ahead with the bond reductions with the exception of the grading bonds. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to accept the monuments, street and storm drain improvements of Tract 4140, 4141 and 4142 (except for Tract 4140 -1 street improvements) as complete; authorize the City Clerk to exonerate the monument bonds as listed in the staff report; and authorize the City Clerk to reduce all street, and storm drain bonds as listed in the staff report to 10% of the original bond amount for a one year guarantee period. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 8 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: July 25, 1990 A. Consider Appeal of Section 5.60.040(10) of the Moorpark Municipal Code Regarding Newsracks. Staff Recommendation: Deny the appeal. (Continued Item 9.A. from 7/11/90) Mr. Richards gave the staff report. In response to Councilmember Harper, Ms. Kane gave a history of the notice given to the newspapers and development of the ordinance. Councilmember Harper suggested opening the public hearing and continuing the item to allow the City Attorney to research case law regarding the matter. Mayor Perez opened the public hearing. Glen A. Smith, attorney for the L.A. Times newspaper, stated he is not aware of any similar ban in Southern California and believes it is unconstitutional. Royce Read, spoke representing the L.A. Times, and stated that the ordinance is unconstitutional. Noriko Okamoto, an attorney representing the Daily News of Los Angeles, 221221 Oxnard, Woodland Hills, stated that the ordinance violates constitutional rights. David Lack, representative of the Daily News of Los Angeles, 221221 Oxnard, Woodland Hills, also stated that the constitutionality of the ordinance is questionable, but that the Daily News of Los Angeles is willing to work with the City of Moorpark to search for a viable solution. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to continue the public hearing open to the August 15, 1990 City Council meeting and in the interim to direct staff to not enforce abatement of newsracks. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 9 July 25, 1990 B. Consider Appeal 90 -3 (TESFAY) - Request to Overturn Planning Commission Decision to Receive and File the Director's Decision to Approve Patio Cover and Second Floor Deck Request. Staff Recommendation: Deny the appeal. Mr. Richards gave the staff report. Mayor Perez opened the public hearing. Marc Charney, 65 North A Street, Oxnard, spoke as Legal Counsel representing Mr. Tesfay, the Appellant. He indicated that if the balcony is approved it would compromise the privacy of Mr. Tesfay's backyard. He said the issue is that one homeowner, Mr. Sisseck, is being allowed to increase the value of his property by devaluing the property of Mr. Tesfay. Ron Sisseck, 6708 Lafayette Court, stated that there is really no privacy issue because it is common that one resident's view looks into their neighbors' backyard in this housing development. He indicated disagreement with the statement that his balcony would cause injury to and devaluation of Mr. Tesfay's property. He stated that he has attempted to compromise to no avail. Mayor Perez closed the public hearing. Councilmember Harper said he would like to have both parties (Mr. Sisseck and Mr. Tesfay) speak to the Council. Mr. Tesfay expressed that his neighbor has no right to look into his property nor to look over his property to the City below. He said 15 foot trees would not screen his property and give him privacy. In response to Councilmember Lawrason, the City Attorney said it was the City Council's job in this situation is to apply the zoning policies of the City as they apply to patio covers. Mr. Sisseck spoke saying that after six months of working on the problem, Mr. Tesfay has not compromised on anything. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 10 July 25, 1990 Councilmember Lawrason stated it is not within the authority of the Council to resolve the issue between the homeowners. AT THIS POINT in the meeting a recess was declared. The Council reconvened at 9:20 p.m. Ms. Kane said that the City's review is limited to development standards which contain the setbacks and height requirements of a patio cover. She said if those standards are met in compliance with zone clearance, there is no reason to reverse the Director's decision. Councilmember Harper suggested that a Council Committee meet with Mr. Tesfay and Mr. Sisseck and attempt to come up with a compromise. In response, Mr. Sisseck stated he did not see how another meeting would help the situation. Councilmember Montgomery indicated that a determination should be made. Councilmember Lawrason stated his agreement with Councilmember Montgomery. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded the motion to continue the matter to the Community Development Committee consisting of Councilmember Brown and Harper to meet with Mr. Sisseck and Mr. Tesfay and a representative of the Homeowners Association in an attempt to facilitate a compromise between the two homeowners. The motion failed 2 -3 by voice vote, Councilmembers Lawrason and Montgomery and Mayor Perez dissenting. MOTION: Councilmember Lawrason moved and Mayor Perez seconded a motion to approve the staff recommendation to deny the appeal. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page it July 25, 1990 C. Consider RPD -89 -1 - 236 apartment units; LDM -89 -2 - Parcel Mao Creating Separate Panels for Residential and Commercial Projects; CPD's 89 -1 and 89 -2 - 168,490 sa. ft Retail Commercial Uses 28,000 sq ft. Restaurant Uses 2,300 s . ft Gas Station Car Wash, 40,000 sq. ft Office uses and a 6,000 sq . ft Daycare Center. Staff Recommendation: The staff recommends approval while the Planning Commission recommends denial of CPD Permits 89 -1 & 89 -2, RPD Permit No. 89 -1, and Tentative Parcel Map LDM 89 -2. Mr. Richards gave the staff report. Mayor Perez opened the public hearing. Eric Sakowicz, President of Environmental Impact Sciences, gave a presentation describing the key components of the proposed development. He explained that his purpose is to define the project and to initiate the Council review process. He stated that different environmental factors were considered for the three different components of the development and that the environmental impact report was prepared based on the time the project will become operational rather than its impact on the present environment. Elaine Freeman, 2509 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd, Thousand Oaks, spoke as a representative of the applicants. She gave opening statements and said that there are in excess of 180 conditions placed on this project and that the applicants want to discuss fifteen of them in more depth. Ken Macleod, Macleod Construction Company, 169 Teloma Drive, Ventura, apologized for the late delivery of information to the Council. He also summarized concerns of the residents that have been brought to his attention and stated that these concerns will be considered in the proposed development. The two concerns addressed at this time were: 1) the residents want a park built near the development, and 2) the residents do not want Liberty Bell Street connected between Poindexter and Los Angeles Avenue. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 12 July 25, 1990 Neal Scribner, 10855 Presilla Road, Rancho Santa Rosa, spoke as the architect for the residential portion of the project. He provided an overview of the layout of the project with respect to the surrounding area in the community. Ken Macleod resumed speaking to address the commercial aspect of the proposed development. He stated the remaining two concerns of the citizens are 1) that the residents would like to avoid Lassen Street going into their tract, and 2) the residents want to be included in some of the fine tuning of the design for the retail project. Steve Bosetti, Nadel Partnership, Los Angeles, stated that they have tried to mitigate reasons for complaints by residents regarding truck traffic by using landscaping to buffer the noise. Paul Jordan, 5447 Hollings, Ventura, stated what landscaping devices have been used to alleviate the noise and pollution of the truck traffic. He said the current plans show very specific tree selections to achieve this goal. Mr. Macleod, continued at this point to discuss the upper commercial portion of the plans. He said his firm is investigating the possibility of providing some senior care. He also stated that the name "Mission Bell Plaza" is not necessarily the final project name. Richard Devericks, Ventura Pacific Capital Group, Ventura, gave a presentation and summarized the feasibility study that was done. Steve Bosetti, spoke again and outlined the architectural aspects of the project. He stated that the Mediterranean style was chosen because it offers a residential architectural compatibility with the proposed residential project. Doug Frazier, 237 Sierra, thanked Mr. Macleod for the time and attentiveness they have given to the citizens of Moorpark and continued by expressing various concerns about the downtown park, the placement of lights, widening of Liberty Bell Road, the extension of Lassen Avenue, traffic circulation and the safety of children due to increased traffic. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 13 July 25, 1990 Sylvia Whitaker, 461 Cornett Avenue, indicated that Poindexter has become an alternate route for many drivers and she encouraged the City Council to stop developments that will contribute to making the problem worse. Keith V. Orr, 377 McFadden Avenue, stated his concerns about the building of Mission Bell Plaza. His primary objections are the increased traffic and the impact such a development will have on the sewer system. Nancy Runkle, 393 McFadden Avenue, spoke in opposition to the Mission Bell Plaza project. Ron Dow, 422 McFadden, expressed his concern with the already numerous retail vacancies in Moorpark. Barbara A. Shultz, 116 Sierra Avenue, complimented the Planning Commission for their efforts. However, she mentioned that the Environmental Impact Report was late in coming and that the citizen's were only given three days to review it. Gary Wirth, 444 McFadden, stated his concern about the air quality when the traffic increases with the development of Mission Bell Plaza. Betty Sue Horrala, 231 W. Los Angeles Avenue, spoke in favor of the shopping center portion of Mission Bell Plaza connecting to the existing Towne Center. Colin Velazquez, 476 Los Angeles Avenue, spoke in favor of Mission Bell Plaza, although he said he does not like the style of architecture that is being proposed. Valerie Arvizu, 377 Cornett Avenue, indicated her opposition to the Mission Bell Plaza project. Her concern is the traffic that will be generated and she said the applicants original request to build owner - occupied homes should be adhered to. John Galloway, 338 Sierra Avenue, spoke in support of the configuration that was originally submitted by Macleod Construction. He stated that the original submission was significantly different than what is currently being considered. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 14 July 25, 1990 Dan Mills, 488 Cornett Avenue, spoke in opposition of the proposed Mission Bell Plaza project. Richard Favor, 6941 Hastings Street, expressed his concerns for the development and for the landowners, but he also stated that Moorpark needs the additional retail stores. Russell George, 312 Sierra Avenue, indicated his concern about the traffic, noise and pollution if the proposed Mission Bell Plaza is allowed to be constructed. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to continue the hearing open to the August 1, 1990 City Council meeting and to direct staff to begin addressing the citizens concerns heard tonight. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Councilmember Harper indicated that he would like responses from the staff regarding: 1) Future plans the Sanitation District has for expansion above 3.0 million gallons per day and their timetable for that expansion; 2) Discussions with the applicant regarding revisions to the west elevations of one or more options shown tonight; 3) Discussions with the applicant regarding an enhanced entrance statement; 4) Discussions with applicant regarding all senior housing rather than a mix and the issue of only owner occupied housing; 5) Putting back in the 2 acre park; 6) Some analysis of whether the mandated parking can still be met. 7) Discussions with the Town Center regarding connection of this project with the Town Center; 8) Clear explanation of why staff recommends the north south connector street between Los Angeles and Poindexter; 9) Copy of the original submission by Macleod; Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 15 July 25, 1990 10) Discussion with Burger King regarding their proposed play area; he'd like to see the largest play area they currently provide. BY CONSENSUS: The Council determined they would like to have responses on the above list. D. Consider a Requirement to Install Low -Water Consumption Fixtures and Devices in all New Construction. Staff Recommendation: Introduce ordinance no. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to continue the public hearing to the August 1, 1990 City Council meeting. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. E. Consider Proposed Amendments to Moorpark Zoning Code to Reguire that Applicable Projects are Consistent with the Ventura County Hazardous Waste Management Plan's Siting Criteria for Hazardous Waste Facilities. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff to incorporate proposed zoning code changes into the County Zoning code which is under consideration for City adoption. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to continue the public hearing to the August 1, 1990 City Council meeting. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. F. Consider Zoninq Ordinance Update. Staff Recommendation: Begin review of the draft zoning ordinance and continue this matter to the August 15, 1990 City Council agenda. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to continue the public hearing to the August 1, 1990 City Council meeting. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 11. D. Consider Proposed Supplemental Law Enforcement Services. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to continue item 11.D. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 16 10. COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS: None. 11. ACTION /DISCUSSION ITEMS: July 25, 1990 A. Consider Traffic Speed Study - Approve Phase I of the Study and Adopt Resolution No. 90 -701 _ Establishing Speed Limits. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 90 -701. (Continued Item 8.T. from 7/11/90) Mr. Gilbert gave the staff report. Kevin Smith, Traffic Engineer, of Charles Abbott and Associates went over the speed sheets. He modified his recommendation on 21.A. from 45 mph to 40 mph. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 90 -701 as modified. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Consider Request from Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy for City Support of the Rim of the valley Trail Corridor Master Plan. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. Rorie Skei of the Santa Monica Mountain Conservancy addressed the Council regarding the proposed Rim of the valley Trail Corridor Master Plan. Councilmember Brown indicated that she felt the City was being included at the end of the project rather than more appropriately earlier in the process. Councilmember Montgomery said any action should include letters to the State legislators urging legislation to put a Moorpark representative on the Advisory Board for the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 17 July 25, 1990 MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to send a letter to the Executive Director of the Conservancy stating that Gabbert Wash should be part of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor Master Plan and that the City would endorse the expansion of the Master Plan to included it; the staff to be directed to send letters to Senator Hart and Representative McClintock urging the sponsorship of legislation to put a Moorpark member on the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Advisory Commission. The motion carried by voice vote 4 -1, Councilmember Brown dissenting. C. Consider Addition of Temporary Office space at City Hall. Staff Recommendation: Direct Public Works Committee and staff to proceed with acquisition. Mr. Kueny stated that the staff recommendation was amended to allow staff to work with Gelco on extending the lease of the modular building formerly used for the Star Club and to look at possible options. MOTION: Councilmember Councilmember Lawrason secon( the staff recommendation as City Manager; $1,800 to be City Hall Building Fund 8. unanimous roll call vote. Harper moved and led a motion to approve amended above by the appropriated from the The motion carried by E. Consider Notification by Ventura County Community College District of Surplus Property at Moorpark College. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. Mr. Kueny said the staff was still verifying that all the surplus property was in the City limits. After brief discussion by the Council, the following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to send a letter of interest to the Ventura County Community College District regarding their surplus property at Moorpark College. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 18 July 25, 1990 F. Consider Possible Recalculation of 1990/91 Appropriations Limit and Rescission of Resolution No. 90 -692. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. Mr. Kueny asked that this item be Tabled. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to Table the item. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. G. Consider Aerial Spraying within City Limits. This item was continued to the August 1, 1990 City Council meeting. 12. ORDINANCES: None. 13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: None. 14. CLOSED SESSION: MOTION: Councilmember Lawrason moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to adjourn to Closed Session for a discussion of all items listed. A. Personnel. B. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1). C. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c). D. Litigation concerning City of Moorpark vs. Moorpark Unified School District. E. Litigation concerning Moorpark Unified School District vs. City of Moorpark. F. Litigation concerning Ventura County Community College District vs. City of Moorpark. G. Litigation concerning the County of Ventura vs. City of Moorpark. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 19 July 25, 1990 H. Negotiations for Real Property on the North Side of Tierra Rejada Road East of Spring Road (Pacifica Corp.) pursuant to Government Code Section 54945.8. I. Litigation concerning the Moorpark Mosquito Abatement District vs. City of Moorpark. J. Litigation concerning Colonial Mortgage vs. City of Moorpark. K. Negotiations for Real Property for portion of Moorpark College (Ventura County Community College District) pursuant to Government Code Section 54945.8. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. AT THIS POINT in the meeting a recess was declared. The meeting reconvened into Closed Session at 2:15 a.m. Present in Closed Session were all Councilmembers; Steven Kueny, City Manager; Richard Hare, Deputy City Manager; and Cheryl Kane, City Attorney. The Council reconvened into Open Session at 2:38 a.m. Mr. Kueny stated there was no action to report out of Closed Session and only 14.B., 14.E., 14.F., 14.H., 14.I., 14.J., and 14.K. were discussed. 15. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to adjourn. The time was 2:38 a.m. Bernardo M. Perez, Mayor ATTEST: