Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1990 1205 CC REGCITY COUNCIL MINUTES Moorpark, California December 5, 1990 A Regular Meeting of the Moorpark City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on December 5, 1990 in the City Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL,TO ORDER: Mayor Lawrason called the meeting to order at 7:12 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Pat Richards. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Montgomery, Perez, Wozniak, and Mayor Lawrason. Steven Kueny, City Manager; Richard Hare, Deputy City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; Pat Richards, Director of Community Development; Susan Cauldwell, Assistant to the City Manager; Phil Newhouse, Director of Community Development; John Knipe, City Engineer; Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works; Lt. Rodriguez, Police Department; Paul Porter, Senior Planner; Don Reynolds, Management Analyst; Lillian Kellerman, City Clerk; and Dorothy Vandaveer, Deputy City Clerk. 4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: None. 5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: Mr. Kueny requested that an item on South Meadows Park be added to the agenda as Item 11.I. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to add a discussion of Construction at South Meadows Park to the agenda, need having arisen since the posting of the agenda. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Mayor Lawrason requested a discussion of the General Plan Update Process be added to the agenda as Item 11.J. 6. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 December 5, 1990 MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to add a discussion of the General Plan Update Process, need having arisen since the posting of the agenda. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. PUBLIC COMMENT: A. Daniel Lorenzen, 13507 Candlewood Court, spoke in support of his father's appointment to the Planning Commission. B. John R. Pierce, 11998 Bubbling Brook Street, spoke on behalf of Dave Lorenzen's appointment to the Planning Commission. He stated that Mr. Lorenzen has spent a great deal of personal time becoming knowledgeable of Moorpark's needs and is an excellent candidate for the commission. C. Max Yeates, 81 Fremont Street, expressed his objection to the affordable housing project that is proposed to be constructed near his neighborhood (Bibo). D. Charlene Yeates, 81 Fremont Street, stated her opposition to the proposed Bibo project. She stated that projects of this nature should be located in various sections of the City not just the downtown area. E. William Mahan, 41 Fremont Street, stated that he is a long time resident and does not believe this kind of project is needed in the downtown area. F. Frank Guerrero, 75 Fremont Street, spoke as an owner of property adjacent to the proposed affordable housing project. He stated his opposition to the project and said it should be built elsewhere. G. Steve Mercado, 21 Fremont Street, spoke against the proposed affordable housing project. H. Dominic Schmidt, 90 Fremont Street, said he is already concerned with the crime rate in this area without bringing in a project that may increase it even more. I. Francine Harrington, 80 Fremont Street, indicated that she purchased her home several years ago because of the friendliness and safety of the neighborhood. She expressed concern that if the proposed affordable housing project is built it will increase the crime rate of the neighborhood. 7. 8. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 3 December 5, 1990 J. Georgia Kechter of the Top Notch Restaurant, 233 High Street, submitted a letter to the Mayor stating how important it is to relax restrictions for any new people buying into the already established businesses. COMMITTEE REPORTS: None. CONSENT CALENDAR (Roll Call Vote): MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to pull items 8.F. and 8.G. and approve the balance of the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. A. Consider Approval of Minutes of Special Joint Meeting of City Council and Moorpark Unified School District of November 1. 1990. Consider Approval of Minutes of Regular City Council Meeting of October 17, 1990. Consider Approval of Minutes of Adjourned City Council Meeting of October 24, 1990. Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as processed. B. Warrant Register 1990 -91 Fiscal Year Manual Warrants 12707, 12926- 12937, 13001 -13007 $ 22,251.38 Voided Warrants 12445, 12980 (1,912.07) Warrants 13021 - 13077 $109,274.29 C. Consider Changing Meeting Dates for January City Council Meetings. Staff Recommendation: Change regularly scheduled meeting dates from January 2 and January 16 to January 9 and January 23. D. Consider City Hall Closure on December 31 1990. Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 90 -728 authorizing the closing of City Hall on December 31, 1990. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 4 December 5, 1990 E. Consider Early Refund of Assessment District Overpayment by Villa del Arroyo. Staff Recommendation: Authorize payment of $2,658.60 no earlier than April 1, 1991. H. Consider Acceptance of Grant Deeds for PD -1066 (Liston). Staff Recommendation: Authorize the City Clerk to execute the right of way deeds for PD -1066. I. Consider Final Tierra Rejada Road Paving - Tract 2865 (Pardee). Staff Recommendation: Receive and file. J. Consider Los Angeles Avenue Widening (West) Project Status Report. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file. K. Consider Nogales /Avenida Colonia - Street Improvements Phase I and Phase II. Staff Recommendation: Authorize to advertise for bids and exception to Unobstructed Sidewalk Policy. L. Consider Tree Removal and Replacement at City Hall. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file. M. Consider Sidewalk Design for North Side of Los Angeles Avenue Between Shasta Avenue and Maureen Lane. Staff Recommendation: Approve design with landscaped parkway adjacent to curb. The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for individual consideration: F. Consider Final Acceptance of the Construction of Tierra Rejada Road Medians. Staff Recommendation: 1) Accept improvements, 2) Instruct City Clerk to file Notice of Completion, 3) Authorize release of retention. Mr. Kueny indicated that there was an area north of the Tierra Rejada Road Bridge which needs to be replanted by the contractor. He said the improvements could be accepted and the Notice of Completion for the project could be filed subsequent to the completion of the maintenance period and upon proof to the City's satisfaction that the labor and materials for replanting of the groundcover, on that portion of the project North of Tierra Rejada Road Bridge, have been fully paid for and are not subject to lien by any supplier or subcontractor. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to approve the staff recommendation as amended by the City Manager above. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. M Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 5 December 5, 1990 G. Transmittal of Carlsberg Specific Plan Documents. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file. Mr. Kueny indicated that the applicant had requested continuance. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to continue the item to December 19, 1990. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. CPD 90 -2, LDM 90 -2. Major Mod. No. 3 to Planned Community No. 3 and Zone Change No. 90 -3 (Urban West Communities). Staff Recommendation: Approve these entitlement projects as recommended by the Planning Commission and staff. Mr. Porter gave the staff presentation. Mayor Lawrason declared the public hearing open. Tom Zanic, 520 Broadway, Suite 100, Santa Monica, spoke representing the applicant, Urban West Communities. He provided the background as to how the shopping center development idea evolved and presented an artist's conception of the shopping center buildings and of the proposed Community Center in the future area of Arroyo Vista Park. Robert Altevers, 2915 Redhill Avenue, F -107, Costa Mesa spoke representing the architectural firm, Robert Altevers Associates. He stated that his firm has designed the shopping center for Urban West Communities. They have exercised sensitivity of the rural quality of Moorpark in creating the style of the building architecture. Mr. Altevers stated that the rear elevation of the market has been articulated with a series of shutters applied to the wall with a gray plastic border to make it more pleasing. Landscaping also will be provided to soften the view of the wall. Doug Smith, Group Vice President of Engineering of Ralph's Supermarkets, 1100 W. Artesia Blvd., Compton, CA, gave a status of their markets and a brief overview of the firm's operation. He requested that the City Council be lenient with regard to the early hours of delivery allowed at the shopping center. Mr. Smith indicated that Ralph's likes to deliver perishables early in the morning to their markets to ensure freshness to the consumers. He also stated that the City of Los Angeles has imposed restrictions for delivery trucks to Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 6 December 5, 1990 travel the roadways during non -peak traffic hours and the earlier delivery schedule makes it easier to comply with these restrictions, also. Dave Randolph, 10164 Oso Avenue, Chatsworth, spoke as a member of the operational team of Ralph's supermarkets. He requested that the City Council approve a time earlier than 6 a.m. for deliveries to be made at the supermarket. Tom Zanic, 520 Broadway, Suite 100, Santa Monica, spoke again addressing concerns that were stated in a letter Urban West Communities had sent to the City Council. He addressed the setback requirement of 30 feet, saying Urban West does not believe that 30 feet is necessary throughout the project. Mr. Zanic requested that this condition be deleted. Lee Ward, 106 South Mentor Avenue, Pasadena, spoke representing the engineering firm of Linscott, Law & Greenspan. He stated his support for the proposed median break on Tierra Rejada Road which would allow turns into the proposed shopping center. He indicated that it is reasonable, safe and a good idea to approve it and construct it now rather than in the future. In response to Mr. Kueny, Mr. Ward stated traffic five years from now will be much heavier due to the fact that the shopping center will be operational and the houses now being built will be occupied. In response to a second question by Mr. Kueny, Mr. Ward indicated that the future traffic generation from this project and the adjacent future residential were considered in his traffic study. Tom Zanic spoke emphasizing how important this median break is to Urban West Communities. He said this conclusion is based upon numerous studies that were conducted. Mr. Zanic continued by discussing the following conditions of approval that the City has set forth: 1. Project Construction Time - He requested the permit be allowed to stand for the two -year period versus the one - year period. 2. Hold Harmless Agreement for Early Plan Check - Urban West Communities can provide one for the City. 3. Park Fee Contribution - Mr. Zanic requested deletion of this condition. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 7 December 5, 1990 4. Monument Sign Placement - He requested that they be allowed to have a sign on each side of the entrances and one center identifier sign on the corner of Tierra Rejada Road and Mountain Trail Street. 5. Posting of a $10,000 Surety Bond - He requested that this condition be deleted. 6. Parking spaces - Mr. Zanic requested the condition be modified to state "all parking spaces shall be 9' wide by 20' long, except in the designated employee parking area as shown on the site plan." 7. Payment of the Air Quality Mitigation Fee - Per County guidelines, Mr. Zanic stated that the fee may be paid in three installments. He requested that the first installment be due at the time the building permit is approved and the remaining two payments will be paid on the anniversary dates of that approval. Councilmember Montgomery opened the Council discussion by stating that he believes the air quality mitigation fee should be paid in a one -time payment because the amount has already been compromised in value and could reasonably be a larger amount than what is required. In response to Mr. Montgomery, Tom Zanic stated that the applicant will pay for the cost of constructing the median break on Tierra Rejada Road. Councilmember Perez asked Ms. Kane if the applicant's company does change ownership in the future, could the City of Moorpark trigger a requirement for the performance bond to be paid at that time as security. Ms. Kane responded that the current condition could be amended to include this item, but the City would not have an easy mechanism to compel compliance for that condition. BY CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council agreed to the following items. Request the applicant to provide a new layout of the shopping center to a Council Committee to reflect the impacts the setback requirement of 30 -feet and acceptance of the landscaped parkway being built will have on the building square footage and parking. The setback requirement for the center will be 30 feet and the median break will be constructed. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 8 December 5, 1990 No monument signs will be constructed at the entrances and that one monument sign at the corner of Tierra Rejada Road and Mountain Trail Street will contain the identifier of the shopping center. The Council Committee will discuss further with the applicant a second recycling bin. The applicant should consent to have the City Council pass a resolution for enforcement of the vehicle code in the shopping center. This should be added to the condition regarding delivery truck parking. The payment of the air quality mitigation fee will be made in one payment and not three payments as suggested by Mr. Zanic. The lighting plans for the center will be returned to the Planning Commission for their review and this will be made a condition of approval for the project. The park fee contribution will be paid by the applicant. Mr. Kueny recommended to the Council that the City needs to retain the option to keep that portion of the street right -of- way proposed to be part of the multi - family parcel for potential use as part of the commercial site. By consensus, the Council agreed to this item. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to approve the staff recommendation to determine that the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with CEQA and is adequate and complete; to direct staff to prepare a resolution approving CPD90 -2, LDM90 -2, and Major Modification No. 3 to Planned Community No. 3 based on the findings in the Planning Commission staff report dated November 5, 1990 subject to revised Conditions of Approval pursuant to City Council direction; that a Council Ad Hoc Committee consisting of Councilmembers Montgomery and Wozniak to meet with the applicant to solve the landscaping buffer issue; the resolutions of approval and the Council Committee report to be scheduled for the December 19, 1990 City Council meeting. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4620 - JBH Development Company. Staff Recommendation: Continue public hearing to December 19, 1990. Mayor Lawrason opened the public hearing. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 9 December 5, 1990 MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to continue this item to the December 19, 1990. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. C. Consider an Ordinance of the City of Moorpark. California Rezoning Certain Property so as to be Consistent with the Approved Carlsberg Specific Plan and Adopting the Community Design Plan and the Development Standards as Described in Said Plan. Staff Recommendation: Cancel hearing. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded the motion to cancel the hearing. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 10. COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS: A. Consider Nominations for the Agricultural Land Trust Advisory Committee. (Continued Item 10.B. from 10/24/90) CONSENSUS: By consensus the Council determined to take this item off calendar. B. Consider Appointments to the Planning Commission. (Continued Item 10.A. from 11/21/90) AT THIS POINT in the meeting a recess was declare. The time was 11:20 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 11:30 p.m. MOTION: Mayor Lawrason moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to appoint John Torres to the Planning Commission and remove him from the Parks & Recreation Commission. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. MOTION: Mayor Lawrason moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to appoint David Lorenzen to the Planning Commission. The motion failed 2 - 2, Councilmembers Perez and Wozniak dissenting. After Council discussion, Mayor Lawrason said he would make it a consensus and leave one vacancy on both the Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission until after the March 1991 election. C. Consider City Council Committee Assignments. The Standing Committees were reorganized as follows: Budget and Finance Committee (Lawrason /Montgomery) Public Works /Facilities (Montgomery /Wozniak) Community Development Committee (Lawrason /Perez) Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 10 11. December 5, 1990 Transportation Committee (Wozniak /Perez - temporary) Councilmember Perez to be assigned until the new Councilmember, to be elected in March, takes the assignment. Affordable Housing Committee (Perez /Montgomery - temporary) Councilmember Montgomery to be assigned until the new Councilmember, to be elected in March, takes the assignment. BY CONSENSUS: By Consensus the Council determined to agendize for December 19, a discussion of Other Assignments and Citizen Committee appointments. ACTION /DISCUSSION ITEMS: A. Consider an Affordable Housing Proposal by Bibo. Inc. and Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. Councilmember Perez left the dais. Mr. Richards gave the staff report. He outlined the seven assistance needs related to the Bibo /Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation proposal. They are as follows: 1. Interim financing 2. Fee deferral 3. Design flexibility 4. Fast track processing 5. Millard Street improvements 6. Parcel map approval 7. Affordable Housing Agreement Mr. Richards continued by saying that the fast track processing is of great importance at this time. The Council had been provided a letter granting a 90 -day escrow extension, to the applicant by the property owner, to expire on April 1, 1991, but Mr. Richards explained that 3 months' time may not be sufficient to process the application. Councilmember Montgomery stated that the applicant needs to request an additional 90 days extension of escrow from the property owner and that the applicant needs to address the concerns of the adjacent property owners. David Fukutomi, representing Bibo, Inc., 360 Mobil Avenue, Camarillo, stated that they will be happy to meet with the Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 11 December 5, 1990 adjacent property owners to hear and address their concerns. However, he indicated that Bibo, Inc. needs to file the application for some of the project funding the first of January and they need some favorable direction from the City Council prior to doing this. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Mayor Lawrason seconded a motion to request from the applicant a written escrow extension, for a time period of at least six months, prior to providing any commitment of City resource in support of this project; the two permits to be processed concurrently; the applicant to meet with neighboring residents to discuss their concerns with the project. The motion carried by voice vote 3 -0, Councilmember Perez absent for the vote. Councilmember Perez returned to the dais. B. Consider Report Related to Overseeding Peach Hill Park Turf. Staff Recommendation: Approve overseeding a portion of the park with Bermuda grass seed. The staff report was deferred. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to approve the staff recommendation to overseed the park with Bermuda grass seed as outlined in the staff report dated November 30, 1990. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. C. Consider Report on Council Agenda Packets being Provided to the Press. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to continue the item to the December 19, 1990 City Council meeting. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. D. Consider An Additional Monthly City Council Meeting. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. After brief Council discussion, the following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Wozniak moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to schedule an adjourned meeting for the second Wednesday of each month on a trial basis effective with the month of January 1991; the meeting dates for January only to be 1/9, 1/16 (the additional meeting) , and 1/23; the trial basis to be evaluated after three months. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 12 December 5, 1990 E. Consider Improvements to Parkwav on the North Side of Tierra Rejada Road West of Spring Road (Pacifica). Staff Recommendation: Authorize use of surplus AD 84 -2 funds and approve project and authorize staff to solicit proposals for design. In response to Mayor Lawrason, Mr. Gilbert said is was staff's estimate that the project would not exceed the $60,974 surplus AD84 -2 funds. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to approve the staff recommendation to authorize the use of the surplus AD84 -2 improvement assessments for the construction of the parkway improvements described in the staff report dated November 26, 1990; to authorize staff to solicit proposals for a project design and construction cost estimate compatible with future block wall repair efforts. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. F. Consider Change to Bridge Design for the Freeway Connector Project. Staff Recommendation: City Council direct staff to advise Caltrans that the City is not opposed to the changes to the bridge deck design. Councilmember Montgomery expressed his concern that the new design have the same seismic stability as the previous one. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to approve the staff recommendation to advise Caltrans that the City is not opposed to the changes to the bridge design with the caveat that the City get a letter from Caltrans that the new design has the same seismic stability as the previous one. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. G. Reconsideration of PD -1048 (Colin Velasquez). Staff Recommendation: That City Council give staff direction as to the scope of work for a traffic study to be completed for this project; and direct staff to process this project in a manner by which a decision by the Planning Commission may be made no later than ninety days from the date an application is deemed complete by the City. The staff report was deferred. In response to Councilmember Perez, Mr. Richards said the application process could reasonably be completed in 90 days due to the fact that staff is already familiar with the project and a lot of the preparation has already been done. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 13 Councilmember needs to be. to be studied came to their December 5, 1990 Perez asked what the scope of the traffic study Mr. Richards said only a few intersections need so the City has a document to justify how they conclusions. Mayor Lawrason indicated that the applicant disagrees with the imposition of a traffic study being conducted and any additional conditions of approval being imposed upon him. He said the applicant may not proceed with the project after he complies with the earthquake standards that have been imposed on him recently. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved the staff recommendation with the scope for the traffic analysis to be as outlined in points 1 - 4 of the staff report dated November 14, 1990; that the cost to the applicant for the traffic study be capped at $1,500. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. BY CONSENSUS: By consensus the Council determined to have the Community Development Committee look at the parking for the project and a potential extension on compliance with the Unreinforced Masonry Buildings requirement if an application is submitted for the project; applicant to be given 30 - 60 days to file an application. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. H. Consider Performance Guarantees for Developer Improvements. Staff Recommendation: Approve the placement of condition of approval on all future development projects regarding walls, fences, landscaping and other non - public improvements. After brief discussion by the Council, the following motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to approve the staff recommendation to approve the placement of the following condition of approval on all future discretionary projects: No zoning Clearance or Building Permit may be issued for construction until all on -site improvements specified in this permit have been provided a Faithful Performance Bond to guarantee the construction and maintenance of perimeter tract walls, including stucco treatment; landscaping; fences; slope planting or other landscape improvements not related to grading; private recreational facilities, etc. Said on -site improvements shall be completed within 120 days of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. In case of failure to comply with any term or provision of Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 14 December 5, 1990 this condition, the City Council may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the City, the City Council may reduce the amount of the bond; however, the bond must be kept in full effect for one year after the first occupancy to guarantee that items such as perimeter walls, landscaping, etc. are maintained. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. I. Consider South Meadows Park - Tennis Court Construction - Funds from Urban West Communities for Tennis Posts. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Mayor Lawrason seconded a motion to use $3,300 from Urban West Communities' inspection deposit for this project to pay for corner posts for the tennis court fencing to allow placement of a windscreen. The money will be refunded to UWC for this purpose. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Councilmember Perez said that there needed to be consideration of constructing a restroom on this site. He said the park warrants that improvement. The Council determined to place this on the next agenda for discussion. J. Discussion of Documents Prepared by PBR on the General Plan Update. Mayor Lawrason indicated his disappointment in the quality of the Draft Elements of the General Plan Update which had been prepared by PBR. He indicated the need to work with PBR to get the documents in an acceptable form. MOTION: Mayor Lawrason moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to cancel the General Plan Update Workshop of December 10 and reschedule to January 14, 1990. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 12. ORDINANCES: None were presented. 13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: None were requested. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 15 December 5, 1990 14. CLOSED SESSION: MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to adjourn to closed Session for a discussion of all items: 'A. Personnel. B. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1). \C. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c). D. Litigation concerning City of Moorpark vs. Moorpark Unified School District. E. Litigation concerning Moorpark Unified School District vs. City of Moorpark. F. Litigation concerning Ventura County Community College District vs. City of Moorpark. G. Litigation concerning the County of Ventura vs. City of Moorpark. H. Negotiations for Real Property on the North side of Tierra Rejada Road East of Spring Road (Pacifica Corp.) pursuant to Government Code Section 54945.8. I. Litigation concerning the Moorpark Mosquito Abatement District vs. City of Moorpark. J. Litigation concerning Colonial Mortgage vs. the City of Moorpark. K. Negotiations for Real Property at 289 Casey Road (Moorpark Unified School District) pursuant to Government Code Section 54945.8. L. Negotiations for Real Property on Los Angeles Avenue (East) pursuant to Government Code Section 54945.8. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. AT THIS POINT in the meeting a recess was declared. The time was 12:42 a.m. The Council reconvened into Closed Session at 12:50 a.m. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 16 December 5, 1990 Present in Closed Session were all Councilmembers; Steven Kueny, City Manager; Richard Hare, Deputy City Manager; and Cheryl Kane, City Attorney. The meeting reconvened into Open Session at 1:12 a.m. Mr. Kueny reported there was no action to report out of Closed Session to report and only items 14.A., 14.C., 14.I. and 14.L. were discussed. 15. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to adjourn. The voice vote was unanimous. The time was 1:12 a.m. 1 Paul W. Law son Jr., May ATTEST: Lillian E. Kellerman, City C