Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1992 0429 CC SPCMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California April 29, 1992 A special Meeting Ot the city council of the city of MoorparK was nela on April ZV, 1992 in the Council Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Lawrason called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. Present: Councilmembers Montgomery, Perez, Talley, Wozniak and Mayor Lawrason Steven Kueny, City Manager; Richard Hare, Deputy City Manager; and Cheryl Kane, City Attorney 2. CLOSED SESSION: MOTION: Councilmember Wozniak moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to go into Closed Session for a discussion of all items listed on the agenda: A. Personnel. B. Personnel pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. C. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1). D. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c). E. Litigation concerning Ventura County Community College District Case No. 107569 vs. City of Moorpark. F. Litigation concerning the Moorpark Mosquito Abatement District vs. City of Moorpark. G. Negotiations for Real Property at 280 Casey Road (Moorpark Unified School District) pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. H. Litigation concerning Conejo Freeway Properties, LTD. vs. City of Moorpark. I. Litigation concerning City of Moorpark vs. Southern California Edison, et al. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Present in Closed Session were all Councilmembers; Steven Kueny, City Manager; Richard Hare, Deputy City Manager; and Cheryl Kane, City Attorney. The meeting reconvened into Open Session at 6:35 p.m. Mr. Kueny stated that there was no action to report out of Closed Session and only Closed Session Items 2.A., 2.F., 2.G., 2.H., and 2.J. were discussed. AT THIS POINT IN the meeting a recess was declared. The time was 7:10 p.m. Mayor Lawrason called the meeting back to order at 7:25 p.m. 3. 4. 5. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 April 29, 1992 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Councilmember Perez led the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Montgomery, Perez, Talley, Wozniak, and Mayor Lawrason. Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; Pat Richards, Director of Community Development; Deborah Traffenstedt, Senior Planner; Charles Abbott, City Engineer; Dirk Lovett, Assistant City Engineer; Lillian E. Kellerman, City Clerk; Dorothy Vandaveer, Deputy City Clerk. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (HEARING CLOSED) A. Consider General Plan Update Land Use and Circulation Elements, Sphere of Influence Expansion Study, and Environmental Impact Report (GPA -89 -1 and Zone Change 89 -1). Staff Recommendation: Continue Council discussion. Mr. Richards gave the staff report and went over the items that need to be completed prior to the May 13 adoption of the General Plan. In response to Mayor Lawrason, Mr. Abbott said that another "run" of the traffic model showed that if the State Route 118 bypass extension from Gabbert Road west was eliminated and the traffic put on Gabbert Road, extensive work would have to be done at the intersection of Gabbert Road and Los Angeles Avenue. Mr. Richards said that Austin Foust asked for reconsideration of the "D" Street connection elimination. Councilmember Wozniak said he believed when the Council added back "D" Street to the Circulation Exhibit they had not added back the "loop" (of "D" Street) connecting proposed State Route 23 to Spring Road. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to put back in the Circulation Exhibit the "loop" connection of "D" Street at proposed State Route 23 and Spring Road. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined that High Street to State Route 118 is to be a rural collector and that the designation of rural collector is to continue to the "loop" connection of "D" Street. Land Use Goals & Policies CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to change Goal 2 on page 9 to "...Sphere of Interest." CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined that with regard to Policy 5.4, the reference to "rural low" and "rural high" should be deleted to allow for the clustering of residential units; that the last sentence of the policy should be deleted; that "and affordable housing benefit" should be added to the list of benefits. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 3 April 29, 1992 CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined that with regard to Policy 13.3, the misspelling of "coordinated" would be corrected. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined that Policy 13.5 should be rewritten by staff to delete "with expansion of housing stock." CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined that Policy 13.6 should be revised to read, "The City shall establish and implement a business attraction, promotion and retention plan." After discussion of the residential land use designations, the Council took the following consensus action regarding density: CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined that 1) Table 2 on page 21 would be revised to show the following revisions to maximum density: Medium, 4.0 DU /Acre; High, 7.0 DU /Acre; Very High, 15.0 DU /Acre; and, 2) would be revised to show the following revisions to maximum allowable density limit: Low, 2.0 DU /Acre; Medium Low, 3.0 DU /Acre; Medium 5.0 DU /Acre; High, 10.0 DU /Acre. AT THIS POINT in the meeting a recess was declared. The time was 8:23 p.m. The Council reconvened at 8:45 p.m. General Plan Amendment Applicants As part of the General Plan Update, the Council considered the ten requests for General Plan Amendments currently filed. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to change the Land Use designation for General Plan Amendment Request 89 -1A, Anderson, to C2. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to leave the Land Use designation for General Plan Amendment Applicant 89 -1B, Estes, at AG1. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to change the Land Use designation of General Plan Amendment Applicant 89 -1C, Guny, to RL. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined that as General Plan Amendment Applicant 89 -1D, JBR Development Company, was a specific plan, they will wait until later in the evening to make a decision. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to change the Land Use designation of General Plan Amendment Applicant 89 -1E, Kavli, to I -1. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to consider General Plan Amendment Application 89 -1F, Levy Company, with the specific plans later this evening. General Plan Amendment Application 89 -G was not considered by the Council as the Westland Company General Plan Amendment was approved in October, 1991. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to consider General Plan Amendment Application 89 -1H later in the evening with the specific plans. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to change the Land Use designation of General Plan Amendment Applicant 89 -1I, Scaroni, to H. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 4 April 29, 1992 CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to discuss General Plan Amendment Application 89 -1J, Schleve, later in the evening with the specific plans; to be designated Specific Plan 10. Mr. Richards indicated that he believed the Unidos Avenue area needed more review prior to making any changes and recommended that the Council direct staff to continue to look at this area at the time of another General Plan revision. He said he believed there were too many questions still remaining unanswered at this time for action to be taken. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined that no change would be made to Unidos Avenue at this time in the Circulation Element. Bugle Boy /Gemco Property CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to designate the south 10 3/4 acres abutting Los Angeles Avenue as commercial. SPECIFIC PLANS Specific Plan No. 1 CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined that the area of this project south of the proposed State Route 118 bypass should have no greater density than 1 DU /acre; 415 DU to be set at the maximum density; 620 DU to be set as the density limit; the General Commercial to be replaced with the Public /Institution designation; park designation not to be shown. Specific Plan No. 2 CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined that for Specific Plan No. 2 the maximum density would be 475 DU and the density limit 712 DU. Specific Plan No. 3 CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to leave the Land Use designation for Specific Plan No. 3 as open space. Specific Plan No. 4 CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to concur with the County regarding a Land Use designation of open space for Specific Plan No. 4. AT THIS POINT in the meeting, the Mayor declared a recess. The time was 10:45 p.m. The Council reconvened at 11:00 p.m. Specific Plan No. 5 CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to include this area in the General Plan with the current Land Use designation assigned by the County of Ventura; to be deleted as a Specific Plan. Specific Plan No. 6 CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to include this area in the General Plan with the current Land Use designation assigned by the County of Ventura; to be deleted as a Specific Plan. 6. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 5 April 29, 1992 Specific Plan No. 7 CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to include this area in the General Plan with the current Land Use designation as assigned by the County of Ventura; to be deleted as a Specific Plan. Specific Plan No. 8 CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to set a maximum density of 2,400 DU and a density limit of 3,221 DU for Specific Plan No. 8. Specific Plan No. 9 CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to set a maximum density limit of 80 DU and a density limit of 120 DU for Specific Plan No. 9. Specific Plan No. 10 CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to set a maximum density of 154 DU and a density limit of 231 DU for Specific Plan No. 10. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to direct staff to prepare the Resolutions for the Adoption of the General Plan for the meeting of May 13, 1992. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Mr. Kueny recommended that this item be continued to the next regular meeting in case some action was needed in order for the documents to be completed by the May 13th meeting. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to continue this item to the May 6, 1992 Council meeting. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. CLOSED SESSION: MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Talley seconded a motion to go into Closed Session for discussion of all items listed on the Agenda: A. Personnel. B. Personnel pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. C. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1). D. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c). E. Litigation concerning Ventura County Community College District Case No. 107569 vs. City of Moorpark. F. Litigation concerning the Moorpark Mosquito Abatement District vs. City of Moorpark. G. Negotiations for Real Property at 280 Casey Road (Moorpark Unified School District) pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 6 April 29, 1992 H. Litigation concerning Conejo Freeway Properties, LTD. vs. City of Moorpark. I. Litigation concerning City of Moorpark vs. Southern California Edison, et al. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The time was 12:30 a.m. Present in Closed Session were all Councilmembers; Steven Kueny, City Manager; Richard Hare, Deputy City Manager; and Cheryl Kane, City Attorney. The meeting reconvened into Open Session at 1:20 a.m. Mr. Kueny stated that there was no action to report out of Closed Session and only Closed Session Items 6.C., 6.F., 6.G., and 6.H. were discussed. 7. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Talley seconded a motion to adjourn. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The time was 1:20 a.m. Paul W. L aeon Jr., M ATTEST: a lian E. Keller n,