Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1992 1118 CC REGMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark Community Center 799 Moorpark Avenue A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held on November 18, 1992 in the Council Chambers at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Lawrason called the meeting to order at 7:18 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Steven Kueny led the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Montgomery, Perez, Talley, Wozniak and Mayor Lawrason Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; Dirk Lovett, Assistant City Engineer; Lieutenant Dean, Sheriff's Department; Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works; Christine Adams, Director of Community Services; Mary Lindley, Assistant to the City Manager; Don Reynolds, Administrative Services Manager; Deborah Traffenstedt, Senior Planner; Jim Aguilera, Director of Community Development; Maryanne Goodkind, Burke, Williams & Sorensen; Lillian Hare, City Clerk; Dorothy Vandaveer, Deputy City Clerk 4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: Mayor Lawrason introduced Rene Mayfield, the new Administrative Secretary for the Community Services Department. 5. REORDERING OF AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA: Mr. Kueny requested the Council consider adding an item to the agenda to consider soliciting grant funds through the State of California Land and Water Conservation Fund Program the need for action having arisen after posting of the agenda. He indicated the grant information had just been received by the City and the grant request must be prepared prior to December, 1992. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to add as item 11.F., consideration of solicitation of grant funds through the State of California Land and Water Conservation Fund Program. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 6. PUBLIC COMMENT: November 18, 1992 Susan Elias, 13660 Shady Knoll Court, spoke as a resident of the North View tract. She requested that the Councilmembers consider having residents of the North View tract present at the scheduled meeting with Pardee officials regarding the chimney issue. She questioned the intent of the Council if they choose not to have residents present. Mayor Lawrason indicated that the Council would hear all public comment speakers and then would respond to questions. Roger Gisler, 930 Appling, Placentia, spoke representing his mother, who is a homeowner in Moorpark. He stated that his mother does not have the financial ability to pay the amount she is being assessed by the City of Moorpark for the Assessment District 92 -1. Ann and Tony Morino, 13509 Cedarpine, spoke regarding the chimney issue. Mr. Morino said D -Way Inspection Service inspected the chimney on their home and found several items that were in violation of the safety code issues. He stated that this issue needs to be addressed with Pardee Construction, builder of the homes. Mary Cosgrove, 4126 Greenbush Lane, spoke as a resident of the North View Tract. She said there was recently a chimney fire in a tract of homes in Simi Valley and the City sent inspectors out to inspect the entire tract. Gerald Goldstein, 11932 Los Angeles Avenue, spoke regarding Code Enforcement issues in the City. He also requested that the names of persons applying for appointed positions be made public by some method. Mayor Lawrason indicated that he had been contacted by a number of the homeowners who want to attend the meeting with Pardee representatives. He said he discouraged homeowner attendance because it may potentially bias Pardee's position with the City. Councilmember Montgomery stated that the Council has decided that no Councilmembers will be present at the meeting, but instead City staff will represent the City. The Council withdrew from attendance due to the fact that Pardee has chosen not to send their senior executives and is not honoring the initial Council request to meet with top officials from their company. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 3 7. 8. November 18, 1992 In response to Ms. Elias, Councilmember Perez asked for clarification of what the City's intent and obligation is with regard to this issue. Ms. Kane clarified that legally the Council has no obligations to fulfill. She said the fact that the Council has no liability in this matter would allow them to remove themselves from the situation and leave it to the homeowners to deal with. However, in their general concern, they have taken an active role in the matter to bring about a timely resolution of this issue even though they have no legal obligation to do so. Councilmember Wozniak stated that the Council will pursue the resolution of this matter because it is a safety issue. He assured the citizens that the Council is working with them and not against them. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Councilmember Montgomery reported on the LAFCO meeting he attended with Mayor Lawrason. CONSENT CALENDAR: MOTION: Councilmember Wozniak moved and Councilmember Talley seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by unanimous roll call vote. A. Consider Approval of Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of November 4. 1992 . Consider Approval of Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting of November 4. 1992. Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes as processed. B. Warrant Register FY 1992/93 Manual Warrants 18802 -18807 $ 803.96 Voided Warrants 18491 (40.00) Regular Warrants 18810 -18911 $352,866.41 Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 4 November 18, 1992 C. Consider CPD 89 -2 Minor Mod No. 3 (Ventura Pacific Capital Group) Elevation Modifications and Clarification of Condition of Approval Verbiage Regarding Signage. Staff Recommendation: Continue this item to December 2, 1992. (Continued Item 8.K. from 10/21/92; Item 8.C. from 11/4/92) D. City Manager Approved Contract for the Construction of Curb Gutter and Sidewalk on the West Side of Moorpark Avenue North of the Rail Crossing (Taft Electric). Staff Recommendation: Receive and file the report. E. Consider Resolution No. 92 -892 Prohibiting Overnight Parking in the Civic Center Parking Lots. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 92 -892 establishing NO PARKING in designated Civic Center parking lots between the hours of 2:00 a. m. to 6:00 a. m. with certain exemptions. F. Consider Authorizing the Sale of Surplus City Property (5 -10 Pick -up Truck). Staff Recommendation: 1) Declare the S -10 pick -up truck surplus property; 2) authorize staff to solicit and receive sealed bids; and 3) authorize staff to sell the S -10 pick -up truck to the highest bidder. G. Consider Authorization to Advertise for Receipt of Bids for the Construction of Landscaping Improvements at Arroyo Vista Community Park. Staff Recommendation: 1) Authorize staff to advertise for receipt of bids for the subject project; and 2) Continue design and plan approval to December 2, 1992. H. Consider Amicus Brief for Greenwood v City of San Marino. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the City Attorney to join the Amicus. I. Consider Pacific Bell A California Corporation v State Board of Eaualization et al Santa Clara County Superior Court No. 724168. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file the report. J. Consider IPD's 88-3,4.5 & 6 West America Bond Exoneration. Staff Recommendation: Authorize the City Clerk to exonerate the grading bonds for IPD's 88 -3,4,5 & 6 as of Nov. 18th, 1992. K. Consider Continuation of Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission as Now Constituted until January 6 1993. Staff Recommendation: Continue Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission as now constituted until January 6, 1993. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 5 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: November 18, 1992 A. Consider Resolution No. 92 -893 - Amendment of Land Use Development Fees, Taking Public Testimony in a Public Hearing. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 92 -893 rescinding Resolution 92 -833 and increasing hourly charge rate from $73 to $75 /hour to become effective January 18, 1993. Mr. Reynolds gave the staff report. Mayor Lawrason opened the public hearing. The City Clerk stated there were no speaker cards received for this item. Mayor Lawrason closed the public hearing. Councilmember Wozniak noted the letter received from the Building Industry Association. He asked how the $10,000 as a planned community deposit replacing the Specific Plan deposit had been arrived at. Mr. Kueny said that based upon size, with the exception of the Moorpark Unified School District and the Schleve project, $10,000 is an appropriate number. He said a project with less than 200 dwelling units might be a percentage of $10,000. Councilmember Talley suggested an initial deposit less than $10,000 but with a per lot unit charge such as the City of Simi Valley uses. In response to Councilmember Montgomery, Mr. Kueny said the City's practice is to ask for an additional deposit of funds when 80% of the available deposit has been spent. He indicated this was a process undergoing refinement as the City worked with the Specific Plan applicants. Councilmember Montgomery indicated that a policy should be set by the City that would address the deposit relative to the period of time after 80% of a deposit was expended by a developer. Councilmember Montgomery suggested 60 - 90 days. Mayor Lawrason indicated that 90 days was the period he would suggest be set for the policy. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 6 November 18, 1992 MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Talley seconded a motion to approve the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 92 -893 as modified to reflect that the initial deposit for specific plans shall be $5,000 plus $5 per unit and that once 80% of the deposit is expended, staff will request an additional deposit to cover 90 days of time and material with no cap. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Consider Ordinance No. 156 - Amendment to the Moorpark Municipal Code 3.36 Article I (Ordinance Number 8) and Resolution No. 92- to Rescind 83 -47 Establishing Fire Protection District Facilities Fees. Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing and accept public testimony; 2) Make appropriate findings; 3) Adopt Resolution No. 92 -894, effective February 1, 1993; 4) Introduce Ordinance 156 for first reading. Ms. Lindley gave the staff report. Mayor Lawrason opened the public hearing. David Festerling, 165 Durley Avenue, Camarillo, spoke representing the Ventura County Fire Protection District and said he is present to answer any questions regarding the Fire Protection District Fees. In response to Councilmember Perez, Mr. Festerling said that Station 40, in Mountain Meadows, does have space to house a rescue team. Dick Wilson, 165 Durley Avenue, Camarillo, also representing the Fire Protection District, responded to Councilmembers' questions and explained that a site on Unocal property north of the City on Alamos Canyon Road has been identified for construction of a fire station. He said this station will cover the Campus Park area of the City of Moorpark, which currently does not have a fire station. Councilmember Montgomery said the Campus Park area needs to be analyzed to determine future need for fire protection facilities. This is all given in the context of the possible annexation of more land to the City in that region. Mayor Lawrason closed the public hearing. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 7 10. November 18, 1992 Ms. Kane read amendments to the proposed ordinance. Ms. Kane then read the amended ordinance title as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK AMENDING THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE BY REVISING ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 3.36 RELATIVE TO A FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES FEE TO BE IMPOSED ON NEW DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY. MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Talley seconded a motion to read the ordinance by title only. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Talley seconded a motion to declare Ordinance 156 introduced as amended and read for the first time. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. MOTION: Councilmember Talley moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 92 -894 adopting fees for fire protection facilities and rescinding Resolution No. 83- 47. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The Council requested a revised copy of the ordinance be provided to them in the next packet prior to second reading. COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS A. Consider City Council Committees. Mayor Lawrason read the list of standing and ad hoc Council committees. After Council discussion, the following consensus was reached: CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to delete number 1, Comprehensive Planning Ordinance Ad Hoc Committee as it has been replaced by the Measure F Committee; responsibilities for refuse were to be removed from the Budget and Finance Committee and to be included in the Public Works /Facilities Committee; Economic Development to include the Downtown Plan; Transportation to include Streets and Transit; Economic Development to be combined with Affordable Housing. Assignments to be made to the Council committees and the committees to be finalized at the meeting of December 2, 1992. In response to Councilmember Montgomery, Mr. Kueny said a Moorpark Operating Procedure could be developed to address alternates to Council committees. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 8 11. November 18, 1992 In response to Councilmember Wozniak, Ms. Lindley said MetroLink fares will be reviewed by the Rail Authority in January. She said the requested zone change with Simi Valley relative to MetroLink would not affect Moorpark. Mr. Kueny said that staff would send a letter voicing the City's concerns with the MetroLink fares will have the Mayor or a staff member request placement on the Rail Authority agenda for their December meeting. AT THIS POINT in the meeting, a recess was declared. The time was 9:20 p.m. The Council reconvened into Open Session at 9:50 p.m. ACTION /DISCUSSION ITEMS: A. Consider Request from Gerald Bridgeman Concerning LDM 90 -7. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff to prepare report for December 2, 1992 meeting. Mr. Bridgeman addressed the Council and referenced his letter concerning his development, LDM 90 -70. He requested a waiver of the three - minute public speaking limit. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to waive the three - minute limit for Mr. Bridgeman. Mr. Bridgeman showed prepared slides of different views of Wicks Road and its drainage patterns. He pointed out the locations of the City Engineer proposed improvements. He proposed that instead of making improvements along the south edge of Wicks Road, the north edge be modified and connected to an existing culvert. He said that would save the north side of Wicks Road from further erosion. He also suggested a slurry coat to preserve the surface of the road. He indicated his engineer, Les Kovac, was available to answer any questions. In response to Councilmember Perez, Mr. Kovac said he suggested erecting a berm and widening the road somewhat. He also confirmed that a slurry seal is what Mr. Bridgeman and he are proposing. CONSENSUS: By consensus, it was determined that this matter would be referred to the Community Development Committee to return to the full Council for further consideration in December. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 9 November 18, 1992 B. Consider Staff Review of Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Blue Star Mine, County of Ventura CUP 4633. Staff Recommendation: Direct staff to prepare a letter to the County which addresses any City Council comments as well as staff comments, including a recommendation for selection of the Environmentally Superior Alternative with an additional restriction that the maximum daily vehicle trips should be 638 until an alternative access route is available that does not require Blue Star vehicles to travel on roadways through the City. Ms. Traffenstedt gave the staff report. Mitchel Kahn, 300 Esplanade Drive, 6th Floor, Oxnard, spoke as legal counsel for Blue Star Ready Mix. Mr. Kahn expressed concerns with some of the proposals in the EIR such as the number of average daily trips. He indicated the limitation of ADT's as expressed in the EIR would literally shut down the business of Blue Star Ready Mix as they could not operate at that level of service. He also indicated that the 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. hours of operation are also a problem. Jim Sandoval, 9035 Happy Camp Road, spoke as President of Blue Star Ready Mix. Mr. Sandoval outlined that the County said they can have trucks entering and exiting the plant from 6 a.m. - 6 p.m., but no traffic is allowed on Sundays. However, he continued by saying they are allowed to process on -site 24 hours a day. He also confirmed that the County has asked them not to use Grimes Canyon Road to traverse to Oxnard, so this is not an alternative route for them. He objected to the hours of operation that are being suggested in the EIR. Mr. Sandoval stated that his company is willing to contribute $200,000 as their portion of the construction of a bypass road that they could then use instead of going through the City of Moorpark. Mr. Kahn addressed the Council again and said they have met with Supervisor Vicky Howard and have expressed willingness to engage in discussions regarding the construction of a bypass road. Councilmember Wozniak said he had reviewed a copy of the new draft EIR. He said it was better than the first document, but suggested that mitigation measures be modified to require the use of nonpotable, reclaimed or recycled water, if feasible. He also stated that if the County approved CUP - 4633 for one or more phases, the City should be provided a copy of the annual status report that will be prepared to document project compliance with mitigation measures. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 10 November 18, 1992 Councilmember Wozniak also stated that the City should convey its concerns regarding the visual impacts from the excavation in phases I, II and III. Councilmember Montgomery said clarification is needed as to whether the daily trips listed in the draft EIR are one -way trips and if the daily total trips for the proposed project would be double of the identified one -way trips. The Council concurred that a 6 a.m. start time is acceptable. Councilmember Montgomery said the EIR should be clarified as to what is a state versus city roadway. Councilmember Talley stated that research should be done to determine what the average daily trip figure is. He said this would need to be more than a one -day study. Councilmember Montgomery suggested that we recommend to the County that the information in the draft EIR regarding average daily trips is not sufficient and more data needs to be gathered. In response to Mayor Lawrason, Mr. Sandoval said that for the month of October Blue Star had 650 units entering the plant on an average day. Councilmember Perez said approval of the requested asphalt batch plant should be conditionally approved to prohibit construction and operation of that processing facility until an alternative SR -23 bypass route is available, which does not require Blue Star trucks to use Walnut Canyon Road, Moorpark Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue through the City. Councilmember Montgomery expressed concern regarding the impact on key intersections -- Moorpark Avenue and Los Angeles Avenue, and Los Angeles Avenue and Spring Road. He questioned what the various levels of ADT's would do to the level of service at those intersections. Mr. Gilbert said the letter to the County should include some language that would put the Ventura County Transportation Commission on notice that we would want them to participate in the mitigation measures as called for by the Congestion Management Program. Councilmember Montgomery concurred that the project should be consistent with the Ventura County Congestion Management Plan. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 11 Councilmember Wozniak City will not be intersections for the City taxpayers should has created. November 18, 1992 said he would like us to state that the responsible for mitigating those increase in level of service. He said not pay for an impact that this project MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Talley seconded a motion to direct staff to prepare a letter incorporating the Council's comments tonight for transmittal to the County regarding this matter. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. AT THIS POINT in the meeting, a recess was declared. The time was 11:40 p.m. The Council reconvened into Open Session at 11:55 p.m. CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to consider items 11.C., 11.D., and 11.E. simultaneously. C. Consider Resolution 92 -895 for the Assessment District No. 92 -1 of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California Making Certain Professional Appointments for its Assessment District No.92 -1 (Mission Bell Plaza) and Taking Certain Actions in Connection Therewith. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 92 -895, making certain professional appointments for its Assessment District No. 92 -1 (Mission Bell Plaza) and taking certain actions related thereto. D. Consider Resolution 92 -896 for the Assessment District No. 92 -1 of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California Passing on and Preliminarily Approving the Engineer's Report and Setting a Public Hearing on that Report with Respect to its Assessment District No. 92 -1 (Mission Bell Plaza) . Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 92 -896, passing on and preliminarily approving the Engineer's Report and setting a public hearing on that report with respect to its Assessment District No.92 -1 (Mission Bell Plaza). E. Consider Authorization to Advertise for Receipts of Bids for the Construction of City Improvements on Los Angeles Ave., Park Lane, Liberty Bell Rd., and on Property Northwest of Los Angeles Ave. and Park Lane (Ventura- Pacific[MaCleod). Staff Recommendation: Approve the design plans for the subject projects and authorize staff to advertise for receipt of bids for the subject project. Mr. Lovett gave the staff report. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 12 November 18, 1992 Councilmember Montgomery requested that the Transportation Committee look at the Engineer's Report prior to the public hearing making to consider any modifications necessary prior to that hearing. In response to Councilmember Montgomery, Mr. Abbott indicated he had spoken with Mr. Gisler regarding the assessments. He said if the right of way was donated by Mr. Gisler, $105,000 would be deducted from the cost. He confirmed that the total cost was $473,000 in assessments to Mr. Gisler. Ms. Goodkind of Burke, Williams & Sorensen said a provision could be made for that money to be advanced. Councilmember Montgomery indicated the City could advance the funds and recapture it from a subsequent developer. Mr. Gilbert said that the Resolution to make professional appointments should be amended to authorize the City Manager to designate and appoint an appraiser. Mitchel Kahn, 300 Esplanade Drive, 6th Floor, Oxnard, legal counsel for Ventura Pacific Capital Group, was present to answer questions. Barbara Shultz, 116 Sierra Avenue, urged the Councilmembers to ensure the storm drainage matters are addressed and taken care of to prevent future problems with flooding in this area of the city. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 92 -895 making certain professional appointments for Assessment District 92 -1 (Mission Bell Plaza) and taking certain actions; to approve Resolution No. 92 -896, passing on and preliminarily approving the engineer's report and setting a public hearing on that report with respect to Assessment District 92 -1; to approve the design plans for the construction of City improvements on Los Angeles Avenue, Park Lane, Liberty Bell Road and on property northwest of Los Angeles Avenue and Park Lane (Ventura Pacific /Macleod) and authorize staff to advertise for receipt of bids for the subject project; the Public Works /Facilities Committee to look at the Engineer's Report and funding mechanisms for the district. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 13 November 18, 1992 F. Consider Funds Through State of California Land and Water Conservation Fund Program. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 92 -897 authorizing staff to prepare grant. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Talley seconded a motion to waive the Council Rules of Procedure and receive this item. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Ms. Adams gave the staff report. MOTION: Mayor Lawrason moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to approve the staff recommendation to direct staff to prepare the grant proposal for Arroyo Vista Community Park for a December 1, 1992 submittal with the proviso that staff be creative in justifying this project in a high priority category. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 12. ORDINANCES: A. Consider Introduction and First Readincr of the City's Noise Ordinance No. 157 - Adding Chapter 9 (9.28) to the Moorpark Municipal Code Regulating Noise Emitted in a Residential Zone. Staff Recommendation: Introduce Ordinance 157 for first reading. Ms. Kane read the ordinance title. MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Talley seconded a motion to read the ordinance title only. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Talley seconded a motion to consider Ordinance 157 introduced for first reading. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. 13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: Councilmember Montgomery requested that a discussion of Mr. McQueen's conditions be prepared for the December 2nd City Council meeting. 14. CLOSED SESSION: MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to adjourn to Closed Session for a discussion of all items listed on the agenda, including a new item 14.M., Villa del Arroyo vs. Moorpark, need for action on this item having arisen after the posting of the agenda. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 14 A. Personnel. November 18, 1992 B. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (b) (1) . C. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c). D. Litigation concerning Ventura County Community College District Case No. 107569 vs. City of Moorpark. E. Negotiations for Real Property at 280 Casey Road (Moorpark Unified School District) pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. F. Negotiations for Real Property on the northeast corner of Spring Road and Flinn Avenue, APN 512 -0- 171 -20 and 512- 0 -171- 21 (Martin V. Smith Associates) G. Litigation concerning Conejo Freeway Properties, LTD. vs. City of Moorpark. H. Litigation concerning City of Moorpark vs. Southern California Edison, et al. I. Litigation concerning Moorpark vs. Fedelety Corporation. J. Litigation concerning City of Moorpark vs. Foster Enterprises. K. Litigation concerning City of Moorpark vs. S &K Ranch, Inc. L. Litigation concerning Moorpark vs. CalTrans (Case No. 123655) M. Villa del Arroyo vs. Moorpark. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. AT THIS POINT in the meeting a recess was declared. The time was 12:35 a.m. The Council reconvened into Closed Session at 12:40 a.m. Present in Closed Session were all Councilmembers, Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; and Richard Hare, Deputy City Manager. The meeting reconvened into Open Session at 1:45 a.m. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 15 November 18, 1992 Mr. Kueny stated there was no action to report out of Closed Session and only items 14.C., 14.D., 14.G., 14.H., 14.I., 14.J., 14.L., and 14.M. had been discussed. 15. ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Lawrason adjourned the meeting at 1:45 a.m. Paul W. Lavirason Jr. Mayor ATTEST: -� Lillian E. Hare, City Cler 0