HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1993 0517 CC SPCMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Moorpark, California
May 17, 1993
A Special Joint Meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission
of the City of Moorpark was held on May 17, 1993 in the Council
Chambers of said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark,
California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Lawrason called the City Council to order at 7:12 p.m.
Chairman Wesner called the Planning Commission to order at
7:12 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Lillian Hare.
3. ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers Hunter, Montgomery, Perez,
Wozniak and Mayor Lawrason
Commissioners Brodsky, May, Miller,
Torres and Chairman Wesner
Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Jim Aguilera,
Director of Community Development; and
Lillian Hare, City Clerk
4. ACTION /DISCUSSION:
A. Mutual Concerns and Issues of the City Council and
Planning Commission.
Mayor Lawrason indicated that the Council had previously
determined to hold a joint meeting with the Planning
Commission every year. He stated that communication was
very important and that the Council was moving towards
the Planning Commission taking more responsibility.
Councilmember Wozniak indicated that he believed that
communication was ninety -nine percent of the Planning
Commission's job. He said he believed there had been
significant progress in communication and that the
concerns and comments of the Planning Commission were
being conveyed to the City Council. He said he credited
Mr. Aguilera with this improvement. He said that changes
to a report after coming from the Planning Commission are
now out of the ordinary. He said he would like to thank
the Commission for the hours of work they expend can the
City's behalf.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California 2
May 17, 1993
Chairman Wesner said he would like to "echo" the
sentiments of Mayor Lawrason and Councilmember Wozniak.
He thanked both the City Manager and Mr. Aguilera for the
job staff is doing in relating information back to the
Council from the Planning Commission. He said, however,
he would like the Council to "pick up the phone" more
often and call Planning Commissioners. He also asked how
each of the Councilmembers analyze Planning Commission
recommendations.
Commissioner Brodsky said he believes staff has done an
excellent job in communicating from the Planning
Commission to the Council. He said the Planning
Commission appreciates direction from the Council. He
said there were examples of certain matters that did not
come to the Planning Commission and that the Planning
Commission didn't hear about until presented to the City
Council; for example, the distance change for the
proposed adult facilities ordinance, and the drainage
problem with the McDonald's project related to Caltrans.
Mr. Kueny explained the background on Caltrans' concerns
regarding McDonald's project drainage and indicated that
there was nothing that the Planning Commission could have
done differently regarding this issue.
Councilmember Perez indicated that relative to the adult
facilities ordinance the Community Development Committee
considered the same 500 foot distance recommended by the
Planning Commission and that revision to this distance
occurred during Council discussions. He said it was a
policy issue. He said as far as the analysis done by the
Council relative to Planning Commission recommendations,
consistency in decisions was important and conformity to
the goals and policies that the City already has in
place. He also said that sometimes applicants bring
forward additional information to the Council that wasn't
presented to the Planning Commission. He indicated that
applicants who do so are to be sent back to the Planning
Commission.
Chairman Wesner thanked the Council for sending
applicants back when additional information needed to be
provided. He said this lets applicants know that the
Planning Commission has the responsibility for the "nuts
and bolts" review.
, -C J
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California 3 May 17, 1993
Commissioner Miller indicated that the developers did not
always give the Planning Commission the "full ball of
wax ". He indicated his desire and hope that the Council
would send these developers back to the Planning
Commission.
Commissioner May said she was more comfortable with the
new Director, that information was being transferred from
the Planning Commission to the City Council. She said
often it was true that more public comment was made at
the City Council level, but that was just a part of the
process and did not bother her.
Commissioner Torres said he felt confident that things
have improved 100 percent. He asked whether the Council
would be interested having a Commissioner present at all
City Council meetings to answer questions. He said the
Commission was feeling more useful and had a more
definite purpose.
Chairman Wesner said the Planning Commission feels like
the technical reviewing body.
Councilmember Perez said it might be helpful to have a
Planning Commissioner present at a City Council meeting
on an item that had generated great public interest.
Councilmember Wozniak indicated that when the Planning
Commission felt strongly about an item that it was within
their right to make a presentation at the City Council
meeting and that that had been done in the past. He
questioned the Commission as to whether or not it was a
stumbling block to them not having the City Attorney
present at their meetings.
Chairman Wesner replied that they needed an expansion of
the City Attorney involvement on some very sensitive
issues such as the Adult Entertainment Facilities
Ordinance. He said the Commission needed to know their
"boundaries ". He said more background information from
the City Attorney would be helpful.
Mayor Lawrason explained that he had some concerns in
creating undue influence on Commissioners by calling them
and discussing a certain issues. He indicated that he
wanted Commissioners to feel free to formulate their own
recommendations.
Councilmember Wozniak concurred with the Mayor.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California 4 May 17, 1993
Mr. Kueny said staff can include the Planning Commission
on the distribution for the monthly staff report to the
City Council. He also said it would be beneficial for
the Planning Commission and the City Council to meet in
joint meetings on specific plans and for a tour of the
Carlsberg property.
Commissioner Torres said he believes the Council and the
Commission were heading in the right direction in the
streamlining process and said he would appreciate the
Council letting applicants know that their project will
be delayed if they don't give the Planning Commission all
the information needed.
MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember
Montgomery seconded to adjourn the City Council. The motion
carried by unanimous voice vote. The time was 7:51 p.m.
Chairman Wesner recessed the Planning Commission. The
time was 7:51 p.m.
Paul W. La son Jr., Ma
'(I /
Michael esner, Chairman
Planning Commission
ATTEST:
P O
Lillian Hare, City Clerk
O
90 0
C4 A