HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 2000 1018 CC REGMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Moorpark, California October 18, 2000
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark was held
on October 18, 2000 in the Council Chambers of said City located at
799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m.
2. INVOCATION:
Tony Amatangelo, Pastor, Life Spring Community Church, gave
the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Captain Frank O'Hanlon, Chief of Police, led the Pledge of
Allegiance.
4. ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers Evans (arrived at 6:53 p.m.),
Harper, Rodgers, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter.
Staff Present: Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City
Attorney; Hugh Riley, Assistant City Manager;
Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works; Mary
Lindley, Director of Community Services; John
Libiez, Planner Manager; Paul Porter,
Principal Planner; Dana Shigley,
Administrative Services Director; Walter
Brown, City Engineer; Captain Frank O'Hanlon;
Deborah Traffenstedt, City Clerk; and Blanca
Garza, Deputy City Clerk.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND COMMENDATIONS:
A. Introduction of new city employee, Julie Hernandez,
Senior Management Analyst (Economic Development).
Mayor Hunter introduced Julie Hernandez, Senior
Management Analyst, Economic Development.
B. Proclamation Recognizing October as Domestic Violence
Awareness Month.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 2
October 18, 2000
Mayor Hunter presented a proclamation to Modean
McCullough, Professor of Women's Studies at Moorpark
College and representative of the Domestic Violence Task
Force, recognizing October as Domestic Violence Awareness
Month.
C. City Manager's Monthly Report
Mr. Kueny deferred the report.
6. PUBLIC COMMENT:
Eloise Brown, 13193 Annette Street, discussed the acceptance
of applications and interviews for Moorpark Longs Drugs taking
place in Simi Valley. She requested the Council address the
matter. She questioned why parking was occurring next to red
painted curbs in that center.
7. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA:
(Pursuant to Council Rules of Procedure Section 2.9, Items to
be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar shall be identified at
this time.)
8. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
Councilmember Harper requested an item on the agenda regarding
the California State Parks Office of Historic Preservation
hearing scheduled for November 3, 2000, on the Tanner wall
located at 601 Moorpark Avenue. He stated he would like the
City to take a position on the issue. He discussed traffic
signal timing concerns at the State Route 118 and Lewis Road
intersection and requested staff contact Caltrans regarding
the signal. Mr. Kueny indicated staff would discuss the
matter with Caltrans.
Councilmember Evans suggested staff request postponement of
the Tanner wall hearing on November 3, 2000.
Mayor Hunter announced that absent voter applications could be
applied for until October 31, 2000. He stated Flu Shots were
available for at risk seniors, 55 and older, at the Senior
Center.
Councilmember Evans reminded the community about the Monster
Maze at Tierra Rejada Ranch.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 3
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
October 18, 2000
A. Consider General Plan Amendment (GPA) 99 -2 to Change the
Land Use Designation From C -2 to VH and OS -2; GPA 99 -5 to
Change the Land Use Designation From C -2 to I -2; Zone
Change 99 -4 to Change the Zoning Designation from CPD to
RPD -7.6 and OS; and Zone Change 99 -5 to Change the Zoning
Designation From CPD to M -2 on the Application of Pacific
Community Builders (GPA 99 -2 and ZC 99 -4) and Triliad
Development Inc. (GPA 99 -5 and ZC 99 -5). Staff
Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing, accept public
testimony and close the public hearing; 2) Consider the
Negative Declaration prepared for the requested General
Plan Amendments and Zone Changes prior to making a
decision on the General Plan Amendments and Zone Changes;
3) Adopt Resolution No. 2000 -1782 approving General Plan
Amendment No. 99 -2 and 99 -5; and 4) Introduce Ordinance
No. 269 approving Zone Change No. 99 -4 and Ordinance No.
approving Zone Change No. 99 -5 for first reading.
Mr. Porter gave the staff report.
In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Porter explained
that an 8 -foot wall would be required to be built
adjacent to the commercial zoned property and that there
was an issue regarding the existing wall for the Mobil
Gas Station being located 5 feet north of the actual
property line.
Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing.
Nelson Chung, 1000 Dove Street, Newport Beach, Pacific
Communities, discussed the proposed subdivision and
property acquisition issues related to the adjacent Mobil
Gas Station surveyor error.
Valerie Draeger, 270 Conejo Ridge, #200, Thousand Oaks,
91361, Triliad Development, discussed their acquisition
of the former Bugle Boy property. She requested the
zoning be reverted to the original zoning of M -2 (Limited
Industrial). She stated they had renamed the park,
Moorpark West Corporate Center. She indicated she was
available to answer questions.
Steve Arnold, 4909 N. Buttercreek Road, provided a
summary of development issues regarding the property that
—' was now proposed for M -2 zoning. He suggested separating
the zone change requests for the industrial and
residential projects. He expressed concern about
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 4 October 18, 2000
increased truck traffic caused by an industrial
development.
Mayor Hunter explained why the projects were combined
based on the State law limitation of the number of
General Plan Amendments that may be approved per year.
Rick Penprase, 4925 N. Buttercreek Road, asked the
meaning of a General Plan designation of Medium
Industrial. He stated the proposal was for huge
buildings, located across from residential. He asked
what was proposed to be done regarding noise attenuation
for the residential neighborhood.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Porter stated a traffic
analysis was conducted based on the existing General Plan
designation and zoning, which study concluded that there
would be less traffic for industrial uses versus
commercial. Mr. Kueny explained that the surrounding area
was similarly designated as Medium Industrial, but that
most of the industrial area in the City had developed in
the Light Industrial category. He stated the project was
designed to be similar to the Condor Drive and Science
Drive areas.
In response to Councilmember Evans, Mr. Porter stated
that the traffic study identified the number of trips per
day, versus whether truck trips would increase.
Councilmember Evans stated it was logical that truck
traffic would be increased.
In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Kueny stated it
was his opinion that there was sufficient commercially
zoned property along Los Angeles Avenue.
In response to Councilmember Rodgers, Mr. Kueny explained
the types of uses allowed in M -1 and M -2 zones.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kueny discussed other
comparable M -2 zoned properties within the City.
In response to Councilmember Rodgers, Ms. Draeger
explained that the project was proposed to be a higher -
end industrial park. She stated a meeting would be held
with the nearby residential property owners prior to the
industrial planned development project coming before the
Council. She stated they did not yet have signed tenants.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 5
October 18, 2000
In response to Councilmember Rodgers, Mr. Kueny stated
the proposed project would be allowed in the M -1 zone. He
stated it would be necessary to re- advertise the project
and return it to the Planning Commission if the Council
wanted to consider a different land use designation and
zoning.
Mayor Hunter stated the Council could further restrict
uses within a zone if there was an agreement with the
property owner.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Mr. Kueny stated the two
General Plan amendment projects could be separated.
Mayor Hunter stated that was the best alternative,
because there were no objections on the residential
amendment.
Mr. Kueny explained the procedure necessary to continue
one component.
Mayor Hunter suggested closing the public hearing and re-
_ advertising the Triliad General Plan Amendment and Zone
Change.
Councilmember Evans concurred with continuing the Triliad
General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. He expressed
concern about the increased truck traffic that would be
generated by the development.
Mr. Kueny requested direction as to a date to re-
advertise the public hearing.
Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Wozniak
seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2000 -1782, approving
GPA 99 -2, and striking all reference to GPA 99 -5. The motion
carried by unanimous voice vote.
Ms. Kane read the ordinance title for Ordinance No. 269.
MOTION: Councilmember Evans moved and Councilmember Harper
seconded a motion to waive further reading. The motion
carried by unanimous voice vote.
MOTION: Councilmember Evans moved and Councilmember Harper
seconded a motion to declare Ordinance No. 269 introduced for
first reading. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 6
October 18, 2000
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council directed staff to
readvertise GPA 99 -5 and ZC 99 -5 for a public hearing on
November 15, 2000.
B. Consider Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5204 to Create
37 Residential Lots, and Residential Planned Development
Permit No. 99 -4 for 37 Residential Units on 4.8 Acres of
Land on the South Side of Los Angeles Avenue in the
Vicinity of Liberty Bell Road on the Application of
Pacific Communities (Assessor's Parcel No. 506- 0 -050-
505). Staff Recommendation: 1) Open the public hearing,
accept public testimony and close the public hearing; 2)
Consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for
the requested Residential Planned Development Permit and
Vesting Tentative Tract Map prior to making a decision on
this project; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2000 -1783
approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5204 and
Residential Planned Development Permit No. 99 -4 after a
decision has been made on General Plan Amendment No. 99 -2
and Zone Change 99 -4.
Mr. Porter gave the staff report. He explained that
Condition No. 29, dealing with a waste dump site, could
remain, but that the County of Ventura Environmental
Health Division would not enforce the condition, because
it was found the condition was not applicable. He stated
Condition No. 21 could be amended to add: "In the event
the Director of Community Development requires the
adjacent property owner to the north (Mobil Gas Station)
to remove the existing wall, located approximately 5 -feet
north of the existing southerly property line, the
Director of Community Development shall have the
authority to modify or eliminate this condition."
Mr. Brown suggested amending Condition No. 71 to change
the half- street right -of -way width from 30 feet to 34
feet and the half - street pavement width from 20 feet to
24 feet. He stated Mr. Chung was requesting revision to
Condition No. 72 to allow an alternate but equivalent
geometry for the street termination, the exact resolution
of that geometry to be worked out with the City Engineer.
He indicated he concurred with the request. He discussed
Condition No. 75 and recommended the condition remain as
written.
Nelson Chung, 1000 Dove Street, Newport Beach, discussed
Conditions Nos. 21 and 182 and requested that he not be
required to acquire the commercial property to correct a
property line error that occurred when the Mobil Station
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 7 October 18, 2000
was constructed. He stated he was continuing to work with
that property owner to determine whether acquisition was
feasible. He requested Condition No. 72 be amended, as
discussed by the City Engineer, to allow flexibility in
the design. He indicated agreement with the other
conditions.
Mayor Hunter stated he still found Condition No. 21 to be
too restrictive even with the proposed language by Mr.
Porter. He stated the Mobil Gas station had a private
land use dispute.
Councilmember Harper agreed and suggested directing staff
to work with both property owners to resolve the problem.
He proposed changing Condition No. 21 to read: "Final
design and placement of the northern perimeter wall will
be approved by the Director of Community Development."
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council amended Condition No. 21
to read: "Final design and placement of the northern perimeter
wall will be approved by the Director of Community
Development."
Ms. Traffenstedt clarified that Condition No. 182 would
also be revised to be consistent with Condition No. 21.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council directed staff to amend
Condition No. 182 to make it consistent with Condition No. 21.
In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Porter explained
that correspondence was received from Environmental
Health indicating no hazardous materials remained on the
site and the recommendation would be to close the file on
the site. He stated it would not hurt to maintain
Condition No. 29, but that there would likely be no
enforcement.
Mr. Chung accepted the staff recommendation.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council agreed to maintain
Condition No. 29 as written.
Mr. Kueny clarified the intent of Condition No. 71, that
parking would not be allowed on the west side but would
be accommodated with a 12 -foot area that would include a
bike lane on the east side of Liberty Bell Road.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council revised Condition No. 71
to read as follows: "... Liberty Bell Road shall be designed per
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 8
October 18, 2000
Ventura County standard plate B -4A. The half- street right -of-
way width shall be thirty -four (34) feet. The half - street
pavement width shall be twenty -four (24) feet. "
Mayor Hunter proposed Condition No. 72 be amended as
follows: "The Developer shall design a turning area at
the south -end of Liberty Bell Road, which will provide
minimum turning radius equal or greater than the
dimensions acceptable to the Director of Community
Development and City Engineer."
Councilmember Harper asked if the redesign might
eliminate the cul -de -sac. Mr. Brown stated the cul -de-
sac could be eliminated but it was not optimal for the
residential neighborhood. He recommended maintaining the
cul -de -sac. Councilmember Harper suggested allowing
flexibility and revising the language to read: "The
developer shall design a turning area at the south -end of
Liberty Bell Road subject to the approval of the Director
of Community Development and City Engineer."
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council revised Condition No. 72
_ to read: "The developer shall design a turning area at the
south -end of Liberty Bell Road subject to the approval of the
Director of Community Development and City Engineer."
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council maintained Condition No.
75 as presented.
In response to Councilmember Harper, Mr. Chung explained
the use of stucco over foam for architectural features.
Councilmember Harper expressed concern with the fragile
nature of the foam. He requested staff review whether
foam architectural features should be allowed on
residential structures.
MOTION: Councilmember Wozniak moved and Councilmember Harper
seconded a motion to adopt revised Resolution No. 2000 -1783,
conditionally approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5204
and Residential Planned Development Permit No. 99 -4. The
motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
10. PRESENTATION /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
A. Consider Resolution No. 2000 -1784 Rescinding Resolution
No. 96 -1229 and Adopting New and /or Revised Policies and
Standards Pertaining to Engineering Matters. (Continued
from Meeting of 10/4/2000). Staff Recommendation: Adopt
Resolution No. 2000 -1784.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 9 October 18, 2000
Mr. Gilbert gave the staff report.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Rodgers
seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2000 -1784. The
motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
B. Memorial Park Gift for John Sherwood. Staff
Recommendation: Identify and approve a memorial park gift
in memory of John Sherwood.
Councilmember Wozniak gave the report.
Councilmember Harper suggested Councilmember Wozniak meet
with the family to come back with a recommendation.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council directed Councilmember
Wozniak to meet with the Sherwood family to discuss and bring
back recommendations for a memorial park gift to a Council
meeting for approval.
C. Consider Request by Campus Hills Homeowners Association
for Improvement to Campus Canyon Park Monument Sign.
Staff Recommendation: 1) Approve the proposed design for
the Campus Canyon Park monument sign as identified in
Attachment C of the agenda report; 2) Indicate whether
the City Council is willing to perform the sign
improvement work and to fund the cost of the work
(estimated to be $3,400); and 3) If the Council elects to
use City funds for the proposed sign improvements, direct
staff to prepare a Budget Amendment Resolution allocating
money from the General Fund reserves and to proceed with
the bid process.
Ms. Lindley gave the staff report.
In response to Mayor Hunter, Ms. Lindley explained that
it might be necessary to solicit bids for a contractor to
construct a park sign. Mr. Kueny stated informal bids
could be received.
Councilmember Harper suggested utilizing the same
contractor as was being used by the homeowners'
association. In response to Councilmember Harper, Ms.
Lindley explained the design of the sign.
Tammy Bell, 15413 Mallory Court, representing the
homeowners' association, stated they were in the process
of refurbishing the monument signs in the Campus Hills
area. She explained the scope of work. She presented a
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 10
October 18, 2000
display board showing the decaying sign at Campus Canyon
Park and the proposed monument sign. She discussed the
bid process they conducted for the homeowners'
association signs. She suggested utilizing the same sign
contractor. She noted the Campus Hills Homeowners'
Association had approached the College requesting the
College refurbish their signs. She requested the Council
contribute $3,120 to complete the planned improvement for
the park monument sign.
Roberta Sandor, 15497 Braun Court, Vice President and
Landscape Chair of the Campus Hills Homeowners'
Association, requested the Council consider repairing the
Campus Canyon Park monument sign. She disagreed with the
staff report indicating Campus Canyon Park had one of the
nicer signs in the City. She discussed the Parks
Maintenance Assessment. She urged the Council to repair
and refurbish the Campus Canyon Park monument sign.
Lina Santelli, 15549 Doris Court, discussed the
historical delays for maintenance and repairs to the
park. She requested the Council refurbish the monument
sign.
Ted Martens, 15749 Swift Place, concurred with the
comments made by his neighbors. He thanked the Mayor,
Councilmember Wozniak, and Mr. Kueny for their
assistance. He stated the homeowners' association
maintained the Collins Drive landscaping.
Tim Saivar, 15594 Mallory Court, requested the Council
approve the new monument sign.
Mayor Hunter stated the proposal was far superior to what
currently exists.
Councilmember Harper concurred that the sign was dated.
Mr. Kueny stated it was staff's intent to follow the bid
process, and if the project was below the threshold, bids
would not be necessary.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Mayor Hunter seconded
a motion to: 1) Approve the proposed design for the Campus
Canyon Park monument sign as identified in Attachment C of the
agenda report; 2) Indicate that the City Council is willing to
perform the sign improvement work and to fund the cost of the
work (not to exceed $3,500); and 3) Direct staff to prepare a
Budget Amendment Resolution allocating money from the General
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 11 October 18, 2000
Fund reserves and to proceed with the bid process. The motion
carried by unanimous voice vote.
D. Consider Changes to Agenda Language. Staff
Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate.
Councilmember Evans gave the report. He suggested
revising agenda language to make it more understandable
to the public. He reviewed the agenda and indicated
points of confusion.
Mr. Kueny stated staff would be more diligent in making
difficult items easier to understand. He suggested
abbreviated staff recommendations.
Mayor Hunter suggested parcel numbers and other
irrelevant information be excluded from the titles, with
abbreviations spelled out.
Councilmember Harper agreed, unless there was a legal
reason for specifying parcel numbers. He stated the City
of Simi Valley attached a definition page to clarify
abbreviations. He suggested allowing staff latitude to
make clarifications.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council directed staff to make
agendas clear, understandable and reader friendly for the
general public and suggested spelling out abbreviations, not
listing Assessor Parcel numbers unless required for legal
reasons, and allowing staff to use an abbreviated staff
recommendation.
E. Consider a City Council Position on Measure 11011,
Safeguard Tobacco Settlement Healthcare Program. Staff
Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate.
Councilmember Harper gave the report.
Neal Andrews, 631 Sidney, Ventura, representing the
Coalition Against Measure 0, explained that every health
care organization in the County, with the exception of
Community Memorial Hospital, opposed Measure 110 ". He
listed those agencies taking a position in opposition to
Measure 11011. He explained the impact of the measure on
grant funds. He provided the Council with additional
written information on the measure.
Jarrod DeGonia, 3855 Alamo Street, Simi Valley, 93063,
representing Supervisor Mikels, read a letter signed by
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 12 October 18, 2000
Supervisor Mikels regarding the long -term public
financing precedent set by Measure 110" and explained use
of tobacco settlement funds.
In response to Councilmember Evans, Mr. DeGonia discussed
previous litigation regarding the measure and indicated
the County was prepared to fight the measure if it
passed.
Colin Velazquez, 606 Moorpark Avenue, addressed the
Council in opposition to Measure "0 ".
Dorothy Ventimiglia, 7228 Imbach Place, expressed
opposition to Measure "O" and urged the Council to vote
against it.
Councilmember Harper discussed his concerns with specific
text of the measure. He suggested opposing the measure.
Councilmember Wozniak discussed Measure "O" and
limitations on tobacco settlement funds. He stated the
measure was an outrageous attempt by a private
_ organization to obtain public dollars. He stated he would
not support the measure.
Councilmember Rodgers discussed the money spent on
endorsing the measure that could have been spent on
health care. He stated she would oppose Measure "0 ".
Councilmember Evans stated Community Memorial Hospital
would say the Councilmembers were greedy politicians for
opposing the measure. He stated the Council should
strongly oppose the measure.
Mayor Hunter stated it was necessary to care for sick and
injured people. He explained the purpose of the tobacco
settlement. He indicated he would support opposing the
measure.
Ms. Kane stated it would be necessary to bring back a
resolution in opposition to the measure.
Mr. Kueny suggested that a press release be done.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Evans
_ seconded a motion to direct staff to draft a press release
from the City in opposition to Measure "0 ". The motion
carried by unanimous voice vote.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 13
11. CONSENT CALENDAR:
October 18, 2000
MOTION: Councilmember Evans moved and Councilmember Harper
seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar. The motion
carried by unanimous roll call vote.
A. Consider Approval of Minutes of a Regular Meeting of
April 5, 2000.
Consider Approval of Minutes of a Regular Meeting of May
17, 2000.
Consider Approval of Minutes of a Regular Meeting of
September 20, 2000.
Staff Recommendation: Approve minutes as processed.
B. Consider Approval of Warrant Register- October 18, 2000.
Fiscal Year 2000/2001
Manual Warrants 103713 - 103714 $24,774.55
& 103828 - 103833
Voided Warrants 103715 & 103834 $ - 0 -
(Pentamation additional & 103866
remittance copies)
Payroll Liability 103837 - 103845 $14,603.48
Warrants
Regular Warrants 103846 - 103962 $470,009.73
Staff Recommendation: Approve the Warrant Register.
C. Consider Final "Cleanup" Budget Amendment for 1999/2000
Fiscal Year. Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No.
2000 -1785 amending the 1999/2000 budget. (ROLL CALL VOTE
REQUIRED)
D. Consider Improvement Bond Reduction for Tract 4974
(Conejo Freeway Properties) . Staff Recommendation: 1)
Accept the improvements as complete, with the exception
of the park; and 2) Authorize the City Clerk to
exonerate /reduce the aforementioned security deposits in
the amounts shown in the table in the agenda report. All
sureties that are reduced to 10% shall remain in effect
for a one -year maintenance period, the exonerations of
which are subject to City Engineering and Planning
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 14 October 18, 2000
Department approval, and a replacement surety in the
amount of $50,160.00 for damaged sidewalk, at that time.
12. ORDINANCES:
None.
13. CLOSED SESSION:
Mr. Kueny announced that Council would be going into closed
session for a discussion of Items 13.C., 13.E., and 13.G. on
the agenda.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Rodgers
seconded a motion to adjourn to closed session for a
discussion of Items 13.C., 13.E., and 13.G. on the agenda. The
motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The time was 8:51 p.m.
C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9) The Environmental
Coalition of Ventura County vs. City of Moorpark and
City Council of the City of Moorpark (Case No. SCO21825)
E. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9)
Hidden Creek Ranch, LP, a California Limited Partnership
vs. The City of Moorpark and to Real Parties in Interest:
Clint Harper, Roseann Mikos, Andrew Prokopow, and
Committee to Qualify Hidden Creek Referendum Controlled
by Clint Harper and Roseann Mikos (Case No. SCO21959)
G. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9)
A Trucking Crane Rental & Repair Company dba A.T.C.
Rentals & Repairs, Inc., a California Corporation vs. TM
Engineering, a California joint venture; Washington
International Insurance Company, an Illinois corporation;
WAUSAU, a Mutual Company, a Wisconsin corporation; and
City of Moorpark, a California public entity (Case No. SC
CIV198723)
Present in closed session were Councilmembers Evans, Harper,
Rodgers, Wozniak and Mayor Hunter; Steven Kueny, City Manager;
Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; Hugh Riley, Assistant City
Manager; Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works; and Deborah
Traffenstedt, City Clerk.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 15
October 18, 2000
The Council reconvened into open session at 9:38 p.m. Mr.
Kueny announced that the Council had discussed Items 13.C.,
13.E., and 13.G. on the agenda and that there was no action to
report.
14. ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Hunter adjourned the meeting at 9:38 p.m.
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenst
City Clerk