Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1989 1118 CC REGMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California January 18, 1989 A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California was held on January 18, 1989 in the Council Chambers of City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: The Meeting was called to order at the hour of 7:10 p.m. by Mayor Eloise Brown. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Montgomery. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Clint Harper, Paul Lawrason, Scott Montgomery, Bernardo Perez and Mayor Eloise Brown Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development; Phil Newhouse, Director of Community Services; Richard Hare, Deputy City Manager; Susan Cauldwell, Administrative Assistant; Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer; Lt. Richard Rodriguez, Sheriff's Department; Debra Traffenstedt, Associate Planner; and Sally Coons, Secretary. 4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, AND SPECIAL. PRESENTATIONS: No proclamations, commendations or special presentations were made. 5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO, THE AGENDA: Mayor Brown suggested -the Council consider adding to the Agenda consideration of the proposed location of the Renaissance Pleasure Fair. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to add Agenda Item 11..K. - Consideration of the proposed location of the Renaissance Pleasure Faire - as a matter of urgency having arisen since the posting of the Agenda. The voice vote was unanimous. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 2 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS: January 18, 1989 6.A. Tom Thompson (12623 Hillside Drive, Moorpark) addressed the Council in opposition to the proposed location of the Renaissance Pleasure Faire. He further advised that the Moorpark Presbyterian Church is processing permits to construct a new church at Spring Road and Peach Hill. City Manager Kueny advised that the City is proceeding with the signal project for the southeast corner of Peach Hill and Spring Road. The Presbyterian Church has an obligation to finance their portion of frontage improvements. The City expects to go out to bid on this job within 12 to 14 weeks. 6.B. Lynn Tingirides (12918 View Mesa Street, Moorpark) addressed the Council in opposition to the proposed location of the Renaissance Faire, particularly noting traffic problems and negative impacts to local business. 6.C. Connie Lawrason (1491 Ambermeadow, Moorpark) reported that she attended a Gang Activity Seminar which included, among other things, the following suggestions and programs for combatting gang activity: 1) Strong police department program; 2) Highly visible removal of graffiti; 3) Develop a program and pursue gang issue; and 4) Educational programs. Additionally, Mrs. Lawrason stated she was opposed to the proposed location of the Renaissance Faire. 6.D. Elaine Freeman ( 24005 Ventura Blvd., Calabasas) representing Griffin Homes, advised that she was present concerning Agenda Item 11.C. - TR- 3963/RPD -1041 request for clarification of Condition 20. Mrs. Freeman advised that Griffin Homes was in agreement with the Staff recommendation to require 20 foot usable area at the rear of each resident with six foot (maximum) terrace walls to gain additional yard usability. 6.E. Mark Fitzpatrick (13062 Thomasville Court, Moorpark) representing the Fox - Shadow Homeowner's Association, advised he is present concerning Agenda Item 8.0. - Crosswalk analysis for Tierra Rejada Road - Pheasant Run intersection. Having learned only this date that the item was on the agenda, he requested the Council consider deferring action on this item (unless it intended to act positively) until the Homeowner's Association had ample time to address it. Mr. Fitzpatrick further advised that he was against the proposed location of the Renaissance Faire. 6.F. Keith Millhouse (12417 Willow Grove Court, Moorpark) addressed the Council in opposition to the proposed location of the Renaissance Faire; and requested direction as to what citizens opposed to the Faire can do to prevent its locating here. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 3 January 18, 1989 6.G. Beverly Harris (13893 Christian Barrett Drive, Moorpark) addressed the Council in opposition to the proposed location of the Renaissance Faire. She was particularly concerned with parking locations; emergency vehicle access; expense for additional police patrol; possible increase in local crime; and alcohol consumption at the Faire. 6.H. Stephen T. Abbate (13187 Westport Street, Moorpark) addressed the Council in opposition to the Renaissance Faire. 6.I. Wally Todd (P.O. Box 7, Moorpark) advised that he is opposed to the proposed location of the Renaissance Faire, and is particularly concerned with parking and the use of alcohol at the Faire. 6.J. Doug Frazier (237 Sierra, Moorpark) advised that 1 112 years ago the City removed trees in front of his residence. To date, the trees have not been replaced, nor has the curb been repaired. Mayor Brown advised that she was in receipt of several letters in opposition to the Renaissance Faire, and she requested they be entered into the record. Letters were received from: Frances Vose, Norma Nelson, James Owens, Gary Ward and Dave Lashmet. Resaonses from Council: A. Councilmember Harper advised that he received numerous phone calls in opposition to the Faire, however he recommended that the Council keep an open mind and look at the postive and negative aspects of the Faire before taking a definite stance. In response to questioning by Councilmember Harper, Director of Community Services Newhouse advised that the tree replacement program will begin upon completion of Phase II of the Curb and Sidewalk project. City Engineer Delzeit advised that the Curb and Sidewalk project is near completion and he will provide a report to the Council on its status, with a copy of the report to Mr. Frazier. B. Mayor Pro Tem Perez advised that he would pull the item concerning the Tierra Rejada Road /Pheasant Run crosswalk from the Consent Calendar for further discussion. He also commented that he did not see any benefit to the City from the presence of the Renaissance Faire. C. Councilmember Lawrason questioned whether the Faire is an acceptable use in a greenbelt area, and whether an environmental impact report must be prepared to determine if the environmental concerns can be mitigated. He further advised that he was personally opposed to the Faire. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 4 January 18, 1989 D. Councilmember Montgomery advised that he has some very strong concerns regarding the Faire, including traffic, parking and alcohol consumption. E. Mayor Brown recommended that citizens in opposition to the Faire make their views known to the Board of Supervisors who will be making the decisions regarding the location of the Renaissance Faire. 7. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Mayor Brown reported on her attendance at a meeting of the Ventura County Association of Governments and the Highway 118 Committee. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR: Roll Call Vote Required. MOTION: Upon motion by Councilmember Montgomery, seconded by Councilmember Lawrason, the following items were approved by a unanimous roll call vote: 8.A Approval of Warrant Register 1988/89: - Prepaid Warrants Nos. 8000, 8006 -8013 8066 -8072 $ 7,385.63 - Payable Warrants Nos. 8073 -8120 $ 81,440.38 8.C. Consider traffic signal _pole consolidation along Tierra Rejada Road. Staff recommended the report be received and filed. 8.F. Consider street naming policy. Staff recommended that the City Council approve all street names prior to submission of names to Fire District. The following items were pulled for individual consideration by the Council: B.B. Consider approval of minutes for the City Council Meeting of January 4, 1989. _Staff_ recommended that the minutes be approved as presented._ Councilmember Montgomery advised that two motions did not have votes recorded, and with the understanding that these be corrected, he made the following motion: MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Lawrason seconded a motion to approve the Minutes of the City Council Meeting of January 4, 1989, as amended. The voice vote was unanimous. D. Consider crosswalk anal_ysis for Tierra Rejada Road - Pheasant Run Intersection. Staff recommended the report be received and filed. Councilmember Perez recommended that the Council defer action on this item until the Fox - Shadow Homeowner's Association has an opportunity to study and respond to the Staff report; and Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 5 January 18, 1989 further that the item be re- agendized after the signal project is completed on Tierra Rejada Road. Councilmember Lawrason advised that the Staff Report did not address the alternative of flashing lights at the proposed crosswalk, and requested this alternative be studied. In response Mayor Brown, City Engineer Delzeit advised that the signals on Tierra Rejada should be operational within three to four weeks. Mayor Brown suggested the item be reconsidered after the signals have been operational for at least a month. City Manager Kueny recommended that the item be brought back at the second regular meeting in March. MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Lawrason seconded a motion to re- agendize this item for the second regular meeting in March, 1989, with the understanding that the signals on Tierra Rejada Road will have been operational for one month. The voice vote was unanimous. E. Consider agreement_ to construct improvements and approval of the final map for TR -4340 Phases 1 -4. Staff recommended approval of the map and authorization for the Mayor to sign map and agreements. City Manager Kueny advised that at this time, the CC &R's have not been approved by the City Attorney. Therefore, he recommended that the final maps and construction agreement be approved subject to the City Attorney's approval of the CC &R's, and that a representative of Urban West state on the record that they acknowledge and accept this condition. The Council suspended its rules and recognized Steve Howell, General Manager of Urban West Communities. Mr. Howell stated, on behalf of Urban West, the acceptance of and concurrence with the condition outlined by the City Manager. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to approve the final maps for Tracts 4340 (1 through 4) conditioned upon the approval of the CC &R's by the City Attorney. The voice vote was unanimous. By concurrence of the Council, Item 11.K. - Consideration of the proposed location of the Renaissance Pleasure Faire - was considered at this time. 11. K. Consideration of the proposed_l.ocation of the Renaissance Pleasure Faire. Director of Community Development Patrick Richards advised that the County Planning Department has not received an application from proponents of the Renaissance Pleasure Faire. He further advised that this is a permitted use by a conditional use permit. The conditional use could be approved at the staff Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 6 January 18, 1989 level, however Mr. Richards advised it would most likely be deferred to the Board of Supervisors for a decision. In response to Councilmember Lawrason, Mr. Richards advised that the permit would be considered for approval under the provision of a temporary use. He further advised that no one had been contacted at the City regarding the proposed Faire location except for a phone call from the proponents advising they were going to have conversations with the County regarding this. City Engineer Delzeit advised that his office received a call from a traffic consulting engineer gathering preliminary information. Mr. Richards advised that an environmental impact report would probably be required after a formal application is made to the County. He also advised that the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board would have to issue permits for the sale of alcohol at the faire. Councilmember Harper suggested that the Fair proponents be invited to make a presentation to the Council at a Saturday meeting for maximum citizen participation. At this meeting the applicants could address the impacts to Moorpark and define any mitigation measures they intend to make. Councilmember Harper further suggested that the City Attorney be authorized to research the possibility of road closures which would eliminate access to the fairground via Moorpark. He further suggested that Lt. Rodriguez make a preliminary estimate of the cost of extra police service. Councilmember Perez commented that he did not want to invite this type of activity into the area, and urged that the concerns of the City Council be made known to the County right away. He also expressed some concern regarding the imminent construction of additional lanes on Tierra Rejada Road and the possibility of this construction conflicting with the dates of the faire. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to invite the Faire's proponents to make a presentation to the City Council concerning what they expect to have and what their past history has been; that Lt. Rodriguez contact the police department in Agoura Hills to ascertain what experiences they have had with the Faire and to address the Council in this regard. MOTION AMENDMENT NO. 1: Councilmember Harper moved to amend the motion, seconded by Councilmember Montgomery, to authorize the City Attorney to look at legal options; to contact the City of Agoura and surrounding areas, including the Los Angeles County Planning Department, regarding problems associated with the Faire; and that the presentation by the faire proponents be made on a Saturday. MOTION AMENDMENT NO. 2: Councilmember Montgomery moved to amend the motion, seconded by Councilmember Lawrason, to direct that a letter, Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 7 January 18, 1989 under the Mayor's signature, be sent to the County Planning Director indicating the concerns of the City Council and encompassing the concerns expressed this evening by the citizens of Moorpark. MOTION AMENDMENT NO. 3: Councilmember Lawrason moved to amend the motion, seconded by Councilmember Harper, to direct Staff to track the Faire's application through the County approval process, and to inform the City Council of hearings and represent the City at those hearings. VOTE: The Motion and Amendments were passed by a unanimous voice vote. NOTE: By concensus, the Council agreed that the presentation by the Faire proponents will be scheduled for a Wednesday evening and not a Saturday. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 9.A. Consider Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -2 and Minor Modification No. 1 of Development Plan No. DP -361 to construct a 23,040 square foot two -story office building to be located at 323 Science Drive (Original DP -361 approval for a 24,192 square foot industrial building). Staff recommended that the Council concur with the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the applicant's proposal subject to conditions. Associate Planner Deborah Traffenstedt presented the Staff Report advising that in May, 1987 a 24,192 square foot industrial building was approved for the lot directly north of the lot at the northwest corner of the intersection of Science Drive and New Los Angeles Avenue. Subsequently, the proponents have requested a modification to that approval, requesting instead a 23,040 square Foot office building. Approval of this modification would also require a Conditional Use Permit since it is zoned industrial. Additionally, the Planning Commission voted to recommend to the Council that no medical offices be allowed in the building, and that each tenant occupy no less than 5,000 square feet in order that it not compete with the downtown commercial property for the smaller tenants. Mayor Brown opened the public hearing. 9.A.1. Valerie Busby (2801 Townsgate Road, Suite 101, Westlake) representing Cabot, Cabot and Forbes (CC &F) advised that she has no problem with the conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission or Staff, with the exception of the limitation that each tenant occupy a minimum of 5,000 square feet. She advised that this severely limits the marketability of the office spaces. 9.A.2. Cary Okumura (1608 W. Glenoaks, Glendale) architect, advised that the subject building will be located adjacent and close to the first building, now occupied by Tandon Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 8 January 18, 1989 Corporation. The two -story building will be compatible with the existing building, having a circular drive and similar landscaping. In response to questioning from Council, Mr. Okumura advised that all glass is blue tint, non - reflective, for moderate solar control. In response to questioning by the Council, Ms. Busby advised that lenders were not willing to finance the project with a conditional use permit that could be revoked at a future time. Therefore, no expiration date was assigned to the CUP, however CC &F accepted the condition that the CUP have periodic reviews. Mayor Brown closed the public hearing. Councilmember Montgomery advised that he would like to see the condition regarding no exterior roof drains become standard. Upon questioning by Councilmember Harper, Director of Community Development Pat Richards advised that Condition No. 9, "If in the future, any use or uses are contemplated on the site differing from that specified in this permit, either the permittee, owner, or each prospective tenant shall file a project description prior to the execution of the new lease agreement or the initiation of the use... ", provided the City's only review of new tenants. If the use does not change, the City does not review the tenants application. Upon Councilmember Harper's recommendation and consensus of the Council, the City Attorney was directed to draft language to give the City direct control over occupants in perpetuity. Councilmember Montgomery suggested that if the Council approves commercial office use, then the general plan designation should reflect this by a change in zoning. Councilmember Harper suggested that action on this item be deferred until the City Attorney determines a method for City review of all tenants, as well as the ability to add new conditions when tenants move in or out. He further recommended that the review of applicants and existing tenants be self - supporting by a charge to the corresponding applicant /tenant. If the City Attorney determines that implementation of the above policy requires modification of an existing City Ordinance, then this should be presented to the Council simultaneously. Upon consensus of the Council, the word "maintain" was deleted from Condition No. 51. MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Lawrason seconded a motion to strike Condition No. 78, "Tenants shall occupy no less than 5,000 square feet within the proposed office building." Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 9 January 18, 1989 MOTION AMENDMENT: Councilmember Harper moved to amend the motion, seconded by Councilmember Lawrason, to limit the number of tenants to seven (7). The motion carried, with Councilmember Montgomery dissenting. VOTE ON MAIN MOTION: The voice vote was unanimous. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to direct Staff to bring back to the City Council, as soon as possible, modified language to the conditional use permit which will allow the City to approve each tenant, and provide the ability to add new conditions, with the cost being borne by the applicant; and to direct that the City Staff and City Attorney review existing ordinances for consistency with this action. The voice vote was unanimous. Upon questioning by the Council, Staff advised this item would be returned to the Council by the first regular meeting in March, 1989. 9.B. Consid r the methods of implementation of the County of Ventura Draft Hazardous Waste /Materials Management Plan (Tanner Plani plus a review of potential City actions, policy document recommendations and agency responsibilities. Staff recommended approval of Resolution No. 89 -530 adopting policies and findings associated with the County of Ventura Draft Hazardous Waste /Material Management Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission. Director of Community Development Pat Richards advised that Nancy Settle, Senior Waste Management Analyst with Ventura County, was present to address the Council's questions concerning the County of Ventura Draft Hazardous Waste /Materials Management Plan. He also advised that while the Draft Plan cannot be changed before it is adopted by the Council, the Council could, through the conditioning process, impose conditions that are more restrictive than those established by the Plan. Nancy Settle advised the Council that a majority of the cities within Ventura County have already approved the plan; however a lot of areas in the plan require coordination between the Cities and it is the County's desire that the Plan be adopted by all Cities so it can be implemented in a cooperative manner. Councilmember Harper noted that the siting criteria does not address schools or convalescent hospitals, and seems "loose ". He also referred to Chapter 8, Waste Reduction, as being essentially "gutless ". Mayor Brown opened the public hearing. 9.B.1. Mark Reiser (11915 Broadway Road, Moorpark) expressed concern regarding the proposed hazardous waste sites, Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 10 January 18, 1989 particularly in the vicinity of farmlands; and that he was opposed to any sites in or around Moorpark. Councilmember Harper advised that he would argue against depositories being placed in agricultural lands. Mayor Brown closed the public hearing. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 89 -530 adopting the Ventura County and Incorporated Cities Hazardous Waste Management Plan, with the understanding that Staff will send a letter to the County Agency outlining concerns of the City Council and the Planning Commission, and ask that the City be kept informed on the implementation of this Plan. The voice vote was unanimous. 10. COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS 10.A. Consider appointments to the Redevelopment Project Area Committee (PAC). Councilmember Montgomery nominated Les Kovacs to the Redevelopment Project Area Committee (PAC). City Manager Kueny requested that before the nomination is confirmed, the City Attorney have an opportunity to ascertain whether Mr. Kovacs' position on the board of a special district (Calleguas Water District) will be in conflict with a position on the PAC. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, Mayor Brown declared a 15 minute recess, the time being 10:55 p.m. The meeting reconvened at the hour of 11:10 p.m. Councilmember Harper requested the Council consider approving his nomination of Mr. Eddie Godinez, which he made at the meeting of January 4, 1989. By consensus of the Council, Mr. Eddie Godinez was confirmed as a member of the Redevelopment Project Area Committee. Other appointments to the PAC will be considered on the next agenda of the City Council. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, the Council reorganized and determined to consider the following Agenda Items: 11.B., 11.E., 11.G., 11.J. and 11.I (after the Closed Session). In response to Councilmember Perez, City Manager Kueny advised that the graffiti will be removed from the Williams Ranch Road barricade. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 11 January 18, 1989 11. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS 11.B. Consider a status GPA -88 -1 A & B Latunsk deemed appropriate. report regarding the i /Clement and a_ discus Staff recommended they processing of [on of traffic be directed as Director of Community Development Pat Richards advised that the General Plan Amendments and Zone Change applications are progressing, however the Council must determine what level traffic analyses it desires. Staff has presented three alternatives, ranging in cost from $600 to $25,000. Councilmember Harper advised that he has a problem subsidizing private property owners in the processing of their general plan amendments and zone changes. He advise there are legitimate costs that should be borne by the applicants. Councilmember Perez advised that he did not recall being informed of this type of expense to the City when the Council took its earlier action to initiate the general plan amendments. Upon questioning by Mayor Brown, Mr. Richards advised that a traffic analyses must be completed to satisfy requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Councilmember Harper commented that initially the City was being asked to waive fees; now it is being asked to subsidize the general plan amendments and do traffic analyses. He advised that he felt this is an inappropriate expenditure of public funds. He recommended that the City continue to waive filing fees, but require that the direct costs be borne by the applicant. City Manager Kueny advised that payment by the applicants could be deferred until just prior to scheduling of the hearings. The hearings would be advertised when the City received reimbursement from the applicants. City Manager further commented that if it were the Council's desire, interest could also be charged. City Manager Kueny suggested, and the Council concurred, that this item be brought back to the Council on February 1, 1989 with additional information on the cost of the Latunski GPA. 11.E. Consider a report and recommendation from the Public Works Committee regarding the award of contract to a consultant firm providing landscape. plan_ check and inspection services. Staff recommended approval of the recommendation from the Public Works Subcommittee. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 12 January 18, 1989 Director of Community Development Pat Richards advised that the Public Works Committee recommends entering into contract with Wolf Breiman, Landscape Architect, to provide Plan Check and Inspection Services for one year. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to enter into a one -year contract with Wolf Breiman, Landscape Architect, to provide plan check and inspection services for $45.00 per hour, with a $1 Million general liability insurance policy; and that the Mayor be authorized to sign the contract on behalf of the City. The voice vote was unanimous. 11.G. Consider Bonnie View Drive right -of -way and proposed improvements. Staff recommended the Council authorize proceeding with preliminary engineering survey and related work. Administrative Assistant Susan Cauldwell advised the Council that the City has received complaints from Bonnie View residents about the condition of their street, and from property owners about their inability to receive Fire District approval for their building projects. A curved section of the road which connects to the two City -owned portions, is privately owned. Staff suggests a field survey to determine the exact location of the public right -of -way prior to proceeding with repairs or improvements to the City -owned portions. Estimated cost of the survey work is $1,000 to $1,250. MOTION: Councilmember Lawrason moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to direct the City Manager to proceed with the survey and related work at a cost not to exceed $1,500. The voice vote was unanimous. 11.J. Proposed Child Care Development Grant Application. Staff recommended adoption of Resolution 89 -531 authorizing the Grant Application. Director of Community Services Phil Newhouse advised that proposed Resolution 89 -531 will authorize the City to apply for grant funds and appoints the City Manager to act on behalf of the City. Councilmember Harper requested that a paragraph be added to the proposed Resolution stating that, "The City of Moorpark supports child development and child care facilities ". By consensus of the Council, Councilmember Harper was appointed as the Council designee to the task force. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 89 -531, as amended. The voice vote was unanimous. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 13 12. ORDINANCES No ordinances were presented. 13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS No future agenda items were requested. 14. CLOSED SESSION January 18, 1989 MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to go into Closed Session under items 14.A. - Personnel; 14.B. - Litigation concerning Boething vs. the City of Moorpark; 14.C. - Litigation concerning the City of Moorpark vs. Boething; 14. E. - Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1); 14.F. - Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c); 14.G. - Negotiation for real property at 280 Casey Road (former high school site - Moorpark Unified School District) pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; and 14.I. - Negotiation for real property on a portion of Community Focus area of PC -3 (Urban West Communities) pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. The voice vote was unanimous. The time of adjournment to Closed Session was 11:47 p.m. All Councilmembers; Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; and Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development were present in the Closed Session. The Council reconvened at the hour of 1:28 a.m. City Attorney Cheryl Kane advised that no action was taken as a result of the Closed Session. 11.I. Consider authorization for an appraisal report on former high school site (280 Casey Road). Staff recommended the Council authorize an appraisal and appropriate $7,000. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Lawrason seconded a motion to proceed with the appraisal report per Staff recommendation, including City Manager Kueny's additional recommendation that the Council Ad Hoc Committee participate in the initial meeting with the appraiser. The voice vote was unanimous. At the request of City Manager Kueny, the Council concurred to add consideration of an agreement to pepare past sets of uncompleted City Council minutes to the adjourned meeting agenda. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 14 January 18, 1989 15. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to adjourn the Meeting at the hour of 1:33 a.m. until 7:30 p.m. on Monday, January 23, 1989. Eloise Brown, Mayor ATTEST: F' ichard Hare, City Clerk