HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1989 0215 CC REGMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Moorpark, California
February 15, 1989
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California
was held on February 15, 1989 in the Council Chambers of City Hall of said
City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Meeting was called to order at the hour of 7:10 p.m. by Mayor
Eloise Brown.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilmember Montgomery.
3. ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmembers Clint Harper, Paul Lawrason, Scott
Montgomery, Bernardo Perez and Mayor Eloise Brown.
Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney;
Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development; Phil
Newhouse, Director of Community Services; Susan Cauldwell,
Administrative Assistant; Dennis Delzeit, City Engineer;
Lt. Richard Rodriguez, Sheriff's Department; and Sally
Coons, Secretary.
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS, AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
No proclamations, commendations or special presentations were made.
5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS.TO, THE AGENDA
By consensus, the Council determined to go into Closed Session at
the hour of 10:00 p.m.
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS
6.A. Lawrence W. Horwitz (200 E. Sandpointe, Suite 400, Santa Ana)
of Hart, King and Coldren, representing the Villa del Arroyo
Mobile Home Park, advised that a complaint is being filed
regarding the unconstitutionality of the City's rent control
ordinance. He advised he was available to answer questions of
the Council and asked that the Council rescind the rent control
ordinance.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 2 February 15, 1989
6.B. Carol Corr (4914 N. Moorpark Road, Moorpark) advised the
Council that she was a member of the "Concerned Neighbors for
the Preservation of the Tierra Rejada Greenbelt" and was
opposed to the proposed location of the Renaissance Faire.
6.C. Bruce Swedien (4950 Moorpark Road, Moorpark) distributed a copy
of the Tierra Rejada Valley Land Use Study to the Council and
advised that he was opposed to the proposed location of the
Renaissance Faire.
6.D. Beverly Harris (13893 Christian Barrett, Moorpark) advised that
she was a member of the "Concerned Neighbors for the
Preservation of the Tierra Rejada Greenbelt" and was opposed to
the proposed location of the Renaissance Faire.
6.E. Paul Gienger (1800 Avenue of the Stars, #1400, Los Angeles, CA
90067) representing Topa Management Company, advised he was
present concerning Agenda Item 11.C. (Consider a report
regarding Topa Management (PD -1064) request to replace the
painted green metal window and door frames with bronze anodized
frames on a commercial building at Los Angeles Avenue and
Spring Road). He objected to that portion of the staff report
which recommended that if Topa were allowed to make this
change, that the money saved should be put back into the
project.
6.F. Katherine Tigar (1767 Cochran Avenue, Simi Valley) Catering and
Activities Director at the Living History Center, spoke in
favor of the proposed location of the Renaissance Faire.
6.G. Marge Cramer (3240 Moorpark Road, Moorpark) advised that she
was a member of the "Concerned Neighbors for the Preservation
of the Tierra Rejada Greenbelt" and was opposed to the proposed
location of the Renaissance Faire.
6.H. Barbara Shultz (116 Sierra Avenue, Moorpark) advised the
Council that the cement removed during the Curb, Gutter and
Sidewalk Project has still not been replaced, nor has the
"limb" been removed.
The Council directed that the City Manager contact Ms. Shultz
regarding this situation.
6.I. Kevin Patterson (Living History Centre) advised the Council
that a formal plan and traffic study are being submitted to the
County and copies will be provided to the Council. He further
advised that he will be making a formal presentation to the
Council on March 1, 1989.
7. COMMITTEE REPORTS
Mayor Brown advised that she attended meetings of the County
Transportation Commission (CTC); the Waterworks District No. 1; and
the Ventura County City Mayors.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 3
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
February 15, 1989
MOTION: Upon motion by Councilmember Perez, seconded by
Councilmember Montgomery, the following items were approved by a
unanimous roll call vote:
8.A.1. Consider approval of _ minutes for the Adjourned City
Council Meeting of January 23,.__198_9_. Staff recommended the
minutes be approved as presented.
MM
am
Approval of Warrant Register 1988/8_9_
- Prepaid Warrants Nos. 8230 -4234
8236 $ 1,471.85
- Payable Warrants Nos. 8242 -8294 $192,913.03
way for PD -1065 (Velazquez)._ Staff recommended that the
Council authorize the Mayor to sign agreement, accept the Grant
Deed for streets and authorize the City Clerk to execute the
Certificate of Acceptance for the Grant Deed.
8.D. Agreement to construct improvements and acceptance of Grant
Deed for PD -1064 (TOPA )_ Staff recommended that the Council
authorize the Mayor to sign agreement, Grant Deed for streets
and authorize the City Clerk to execute Certificate of
Acceptance for Grant Deed.
8.F. Consider contract for weed abatement on public rights of way.
Staff recommended the contract be awarded to Turf Pro in an
amount not to exceed $4,730.
8.G. Consider adoption of Resolution No. 89-532 prohibiting smoking
in all City Employment Facilities. Staff recommended adoption
of Resolution No. 89 -532.
The following items were pulled for individual consideration by the
Council:
8.A.2. Consider approval of minutes for the Regular City Council
Meeting of February 1,19_89. Staff recommended the minutes be
approved as presented.
Mayor Brown amended the minutes under "Committee Reports" to
reflect that she did meet with the representatives of the Bank
of A. Levy concerning the "walk -thru" shelter; however, the
design they presented was unchanged from the original
submittal.
MOTION: Mayor Brown moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a
motion to approve the Minutes for the meeting of February 1, 1989,
as amended. The voice vote was unanimous.
8.E. Reduction /exoneration of bonds _LDM -3 /PD -1010 (Palmer).
Staff recommended acceptance of public improvements except
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 4
February 15, 1989
specified portion of Moorpark Avenue and exonerate monument and
grading bonds on specified dates and reduce performance and
payment bonds.
In response to questioning by Councilmember Harper, City
Manager Kueny requested this item be tabled until Staff can
check the Settlement Agreement to determine whether or not the
foot bridge is affected by the bond exoneration.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded
a motion to table this item until later in the meeting. The voice
vote was unanimous.
10. COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS
10.A. Consider appo_i__n_t_ments to the Redevelopment Project Area
Committee (PAC).
City Attorney Cheryl Kane advised that Mr. Anderly, Attorney
for Calleguas Water District, determined that there was not an
incompatibility of office between Mr. Kovacs' position on the
Calleguas Board and serving on the City's Project Area
Committee.
MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez
seconded the appointment of Les Kovacs to the Project Area
Committee. The voice vote was unanimous.
10. B. Consider establishment_ of City Performinq and Fine Arts
Committee
Councilmember Harper presented a written proposal for the
formation of the Moorpark Community Arts Committee (MCAC),
suggesting that the Committee be appointed as follows: One
member nominated by each City Councilmember; one member
nominated by the President of Moorpark College; and one member
nominated by the Superintendent of the Moorpark Unified School
District. All appointments will be made by the City Council.
In response to Councilmember Lawrason, Councilmember Harper
advised that this Committee could address the Art in Public
Places program as well, and should require minimum Staff time.
City Manager Kueny advised that Staff time would be required to
prepare agendas; set meeting places; record minutes; and make
reports back to the Council.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Montgomery
seconded a motion to accept the proposal as presented by
Councilmember Harper; to direct Staff to issue a press release
advising interested persons to apply to the City; and to send
appropriate letters to the President of Moorpark College and the
Superintendent of Moorpark Unified School District. The voice vote
was unanimous.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 5 February 15, 1989
COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS
Councilmember Lawrason commented that he was flabbergasted that the
Faire is proceeding with ticket sales and other efforts prior to the
issuance of a permit by the County.
Councilmember Harper advised that he is looking forward to the
formal presentation by Faire proponents on March 1, 1989. Regarding
unused allotments, he suggested this be given to the Community
Development Committee for recommendation back to the Council on a
future Agenda.
BY COUNCIL CONSENSUS, the Community Development Committee was directed to
review the unused allotments and make a recommendation to the Council.
Councilmember Perez expressed concern that the Glenhaven development
off Tierra Rejada Road, does not have easy access to the park since
the construction of the Bridge. City Engineer advised that after
the signals on Tierra Rejada Road are in operation, they will be
reviewing Pheasant Run and will incorporate review of this location
as well.
Councilmember Perez requested that City Engineer Delzeit review and
report to the Council regarding the problems associated with the
recordation of Parcel Map 4318 (Faulke).
In response to questioning by Mayor Brown, City Engineer Delzeit
advised that the signals on Tierra Rejada Road will go on flashing
red on February 22 and be fully operational on February 24. City
Manager reported that it was determined to activate the existing
Urban West controllers and the City Engineer will review the timing.
Mayor Brown expressed concern regarding the continued peripheral
activities of the Renaissance Faire proponents, without entering the
permit process.
11. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS
11.A. Consider City Ordinance No. 101 "Preservation, Cutting,
and Removal of Historic Trees, Native Oak Trees and Mature
Trees ". Staff recommended the'Ordinance be amended to include
trees in rear yards adjacent to streets.
Councilmember Montgomery requested that the words "total of
three or more" be deleted from Section 1.
MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Lawrason
seconded a motion to delete the words, "...total of three or more.."
from Section 1 of the proposed Ordinance. The voice vote was
unanimous.
City Attorney Cheryl Kane recommended that the Council postpone
action on this Ordinance until the next meeting so that Staff
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 6
February 15, 1989
can determine whether all sections of the Ordinance are
consistent with the language revision.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined to consider this
item at its next regular meeting.
11.B. Consider approval of steps for adoption of
Emergency Management Plan. Staff recommended the Ordinance be
introduced for first reading to authorize creation of a
Moorpark Disaster Council. (Ordinance No. 106).
Administrative Assistant Susan Cauldwell advised the Council
that the proposed Ordinance creates the City's Disaster
Council, permits the City to proclaim a local state of
emergency, allows City to commandeer resources to respond to
emergencies, and authorizes the City to apply for and receive
state or federal disaster aid. Further, the ordinance directs
the Disaster Council to prepare an emergency plan.
City Attorney Cheryl Kane read several changes to the proposed
Ordinance, including the title, Section 1, and Chapter 2.20.
MOTION: Councilmember Lawrason moved and Councilmember Montgomery
seconded a motion to waive further reading and declare Ordinance No.
106 read in title only. The voice vote was unanimous.
MOTION: Councilmember Lawrason moved and Councilmember Perez
seconded a motion to declare Ordinance No. 106 introduced and read
for the first time. The voice vote was unanimous.
11. C.
request to replace the pa ntea _green metal winaow ana aoor
frames with bronze anodized frames on a commercial buildinq at
Los Angeles Avenue Sp inq_Road. Staff recommended that the
request be denied and the requirement for green metal door and
window frames be retained.
Upon consensus of the Council, it was determined to continue
action on this item until samples of the products in question
could be brought into the Council Chambers for examination by
the Councilmembers.
BY CONSENSUS the Council continued items 11.D. (Consider adoption of
Resolution 89- - clarification of and amendment of certain conditions
of approval PD -1064 (TOPA); and 11.E. (Consider a recommendation from the
Council's Community Development Committee and a report from staff
regarding consultant selection to update the General Plan Update - Land
Use and Circulation Elements and create a Carlsberg Specific Plan) until
the Director of Community Development returns to the Council Chambers and
is available for presentation of the Staff Report.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 7
February 15, 1989
11. F. Consider adoption of Resolution No. 89 -533 initiating
proceedings for the annual assessments for the "Moorpark
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2" for the
fiscal year commencing July_ 1, 1989, and ending June 30, 1990;
and ordering the engineer to prepare and file a report in
accordance therewith. Staff recommended the adoption of
Resolution No. 89 -533.
City Manager Kueny advised that the purpose of the proposed
resolution is to formally authorize initiation of the process
to determine annual assessments for the Lighting and Landscape
Maintenance District (AD- 48 -2). Staff recommended that the
Engineer's Report be prepared by the Dwight French Group at a
cost of $3,700 for the initial year, and $2,900 for the second
year.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Montgomery
seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 89 -533, and to authorize
the City Manager to secure the services of the Dwight French Group
for preparation of the Engineer's Report. The motion carried by a
unanimous roll call vote.
11.G.
Consider adoption of Resolution No. 89 -534 initiating
edings for the annual assessments for the "Parks
Main +annnra
year commencing July—l-,. 19_89 and ending June 30, 1990; and
ordering the engineer to prepare and file a report in
accordance therewith.� ff Sta recommended adoption of Resolution
No. 89 -534.
City Manager Kueny recommended that proceedings be initiated
for AD 85 -1 for the following reasons: 1) Expenditure
projections for parks and other services may not reflect
service levels ultimately decided upon by the Council, and the
budget reserves provide little flexibility; 2) So as not to
predetermine the funding source for parks maintenance prior to
the annual budget review; and 3) that the City Attorney
advises that action to return any proceeds of taxes to the
citizens by reducing or eliminating park maintenance
assessments must be based on an Engineer's Report prepared
pursuant to State Law. Staff further recommended that the
Engineer's Report be prepared by the Dwight French Group.
MOTION: Councilmember L.awrason moved and Councilmember Montgomery
seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 89 -534, and to authorize
the City Manager to secure the services of the Dwight French Group
for preparation of the Engineer's Report. The motion carried by the
following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Harper, Lawrason,
Montgomery, Perez. NOES: Mayor Brown.
Mayor Brown advised that her "no" vote reflected her feeling
that park maintenance should not be a special assessment.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 8
February 15, 1989
11.H. Consider purchase of a spray boom for weed control. Staff
recommended they be authorized to purchase the spray boom.
Director of Community Services, Phil Newhouse, advised that
semi - annually, the Public Works Department applies herbicides
to various areas within the City to control weed growth. With
the purchase of a spray boom, the time required to spray the
roadbeds would be reduced approximately 40 %; and City crews
could annually spray parks and landscaped areas currently done
by private contract. Staff recommended purchase of the spray
boom and related equipment from Schreiner Farm Equipment
Company, Inc. in the amount of $725.72; and that the funds in
the amount of $362.86 be taken from Account 03- 1142 -906 -002;
and $632.86 from Account 01- 1147 -606 to cover the purchase.
In response to questioning by Councilmember Lawrason, Mr.
Newhouse advised that the City has the necessary safety
equipment.
Councilmember Montgomery commented that he would be willing to
work with Staff regarding the avoidance of sales tax.
MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Lawrason
seconded a motion to approve the purchase of a spray boom and
related equipment at a cost of $725.72, with funding as per Staff
recommendation. The motion carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
11. I. Consider city -wide street sweeping. Staff recommended
they be directed as deemed appropriate.
Mayor Brown advised that she requested this item to be placed
on the Agenda as a result of her observation that some areas
are not being swept.
In response to Councilmember Harper, Director of Community
Services, Phil Newhouse, advised that the street sweeping test
of areas and equipment was not completed due to staff workload.
Councilmembers expressed an interest in resurrecting the scope
and feasibility of the street sweeping test prior to extending
the contract, or entering into a new contract, with Emard
Sweeping Company.
CONSENSUS: By consensus of the Council, this item was referred to
the Street Sweeping Test Area Ad Hoc Committee, consisting of
Councilmembers Harper and Perez.
11.C. Consider a report__ regarding To pa Management (PD -1064)
request to replace the painted 9 reen__metal window and door
frames with bronze anodized frames on a commercial building at
Los Angeles Avenue and Spring Road. Staff recommended denying
the request and retaining the requirement for green metal door
and window frames.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 9
February 15, 1989
Director of Community Development, Pat Richards, presented the
Council with samples of the proposed window and door frames.
Council discussion included concern that the level of detail,
which makes the building more pleasing, may be compromised if
the request is approved. Additionally, the opinion was
expressed that the requested modification would allow for the
color to be changed in the future.
The Council determined that any cost savings that may be had as
a result of the modification was not the issue; but rather the
appearance the appearance of the building as a result of the
approval or disapproval of the proponent's request.
MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Harper seconded
a motion to deny the request of the proponents for a modification to
the window and door frames. The motion failed by the following roll
call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Harper and Perez; NOES:
Councilmembers Brown, Lawrason and Montgomery.
MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Lawrason
seconded a motion to approve the request for a modification to the
window and door frames, subject to the Council's approval of the
actual color samples. The motion carried by the following roll call
vote: AYES: Councilmembers Brown, Lawrason and Montgomery; NOES:
Councilmembers Harper and Perez.
11.D. Consider adoption of Resolution No. 89 -535 - clarification
of an amendment of certain conditions of approval PD -1064
(TOPA). Staff recommended approval of Resolution No. 89 -535
amending Resolution No. 88 -443 for the purpose of clarifying
certain conditions of approval.
City Engineer, Dennis Delzeit, recommended that the Council
approve Resolution No. 89 -535 providing clarification of the
amendment(s) made to certain conditions of approval on PD -1064
(TOPA).
The City Attorney made changes to Exhibit 1 of the proposed
resolution as follows:
1. Condition No. 3C - Add this wording to the end of the
paragraph: "The final decision on the amount of
reimbursement shall be made by the City Council."
2. Condition No. 4a - In the first sentence, strike,
"...traffic signal modification.." and add, "...and
traffic signal modifications at the north and east
legs.." In the second sentence, after "PD- 1064 ",
add, "to the extent such reimbursement is legally
enforceable. TOPA will pay all legal costs,
including but not limited to, attorney fees and
administrative costs incurred by the City to impose
and/or enforce said agreement."
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 10
February 15, 1989
3. Condition Id - Add this wording to the end of the
Condition: "A11 reimbursable costs must be
substantiated by TOPA. The final decision on the
amount of reimbursement shall be made by the City
Council."
The Council recognized Paul Gienger (representing TOPA
Management Company) who questioned whether TOPA or the City was
to prepare the agreement referred to in Condition 4a. The
Council and Staff clarified that the agreement would be
prepared by the City Attorney for review by the developer.
Mr. Gienger then stated he agreed to all conditions as
clarified by the Resolution and corresponding Exhibit.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Lawrason
seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 89 -535, as amended. The
voice vote was unanimous.
AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, Mayor Brown declared a recess, the time
being 8:55 p.m. The Meeting reconvened at the hour of 9:20 p.m.
11. E. Consider a recommendation from the Council's Community
Development Committee and a report from staff regarding
consultant selection to update the General Plan Update - Land
Use and Circulation Elements and create a Carlsberg Specific
Plan. Staff recommended that the Council uphold the
recommendation of the Community Development Committee and
select the firm of Phillips Brandt Reddick (PBR) to accomplish
both the General Plan Update and Specific Plan work.
Councilmember Montgomery expressed concern that the City is
accepting General Plan Amendments and making them into a
General Plan Update. He recommended instead that the City look
at its boundaries and sphere of influence, with the scope of
the updating process to include those areas where people have
not requested amendments, but where the Council can use
foresight in planning the community. Councilmember Montgomery
advised that of the two funding alternatives, he preferred
Table "A ", based on average daily trips created by the land use
change.
Councilmember Harper lauded Staff for the excellent report on a
complicated matter. He advised that using the Average Daily
Trips (ADT) as a determinant for fair -share costs, keeps the
process simple and more defensible.
Director of Community Development, Pat Richards, advised that
the Phillips, Brandt, Reddick (PBR) proposal included a $52,000
option for a geo based, computerized land use system. Staff
could be trained to update the computerized system after
initial set up.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 11
February 15, 1989
Council discussion included the purpose of a sphere of
influence - to discourage urban sprawl; to be large enough to
maintain the City; that it is not to accommodate growth but to
control what happens around the City's boundaries.
Consideration of the City's sphere of influence could be a part
of the contract negotiations for the General Plan Update.
MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez
seconded a motion to select the firm of Phillips, Brandt, Reddick to
complete all planning services and environmental impact reports for
both the Update to the Circulation and Land Use Elements of the
General Plan and Carlsberg Specific Plan under separate contracts
and time frames; to direct Staff to enter into contract negotiations
with PBR for both contracts; to accept the recommendation of the
Committee regarding the level of citizen participation; to
determine that no work shall be performed by PBR until all deposits
are made to the City; and to approve the method for determining fair
share payments using Table "A" (Average Daily Trips) identified
within the Staff report.
Upon the recommendation of City Manager Kueny, and concurrence by
the maker and second of the motion, the motion was amended to
include direction to re- calculate Table "A" to reflect the most
recent proposal submitted by the Moorpark Unified School District
relative to a high density General Plan designation on 15.49 acres
(Parcels A, B and D) of the Casey Road School Site.
The voice vote was unanimous.
As a clarification to the Carlsberg Component, City Manager
Kueny advised that he had spoken briefly with Mr. Tankersley,
and Mr. Tankersley wants to pursue further the amount of Staff
overhead that will be added to his required deposit; therefore,
this item will be brought back to the Council before the
agreement with Carlsberg can be finalized.
8.E. Reduction /exoneration of bonds for LDM -3 /PD -1010 (Palmer).
Staff recommended that the Council accept public improvements
except specified portion of Moorpark Avenue and exonerate
monument and grading bonds on specified dates and reduce
performance and payment bonds.
City Engineer Dennis Delzeit advised the Council that the
Settlement Agreement does require that the developer post cash
for the construction of the pedestrian bridge; and therefore,
amended Staff's recommendation to include that the City Clerk
reduce the Performance and Payment Bond from $400,000 to
$160,000 "pending the City's verification of sureties for
construction of the pedestrian bridge, per the Settlement
Agreement."
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Montgomery
seconded a motion to accept the public improvements for PD -1010,
with the exception of Moorpark Avenue from Los Angeles Avenue 265
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 12
February 15, 1989
feet south; to include all streets, with the exception of Moorpark
Avenue from Los Angeles Avenue 265 feet south, in the City street
system for maintenance; to authorize the City Clerk to exonerate the
above - mentioned monument bond immediately; to authorize the City
Clerk to exonerate the grading bond effective April 1, 1989; and to
authorize the City Clerk to reduce the Performance and Payment Bond
from $400,000 to $160,000 pending the City's verification of
sureties for construction of the pedestrian bridge per the
Settlement Agreement. The voice vote was unanimous.
City Manager Kueny advised that Staff will report to the
Council on March 15, 1989 regarding the status of the
pedestrian bridge and Settlement Agreement for assessment of
progress.
11.B. Consider approval of ini_t_ial steps for adoption of
Emergency Management Plan.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded
a motion to reconsider Agenda Item 11.B. The voice vote was
unanimous.
City Attorney Cheryl Kane advised that the City adopted County
Ordinances which address "Emergency Preparedness" and,
therefore, the Council must amend its recently adopted
Ordinance No. 106 to reflect that the earlier ordinance is
preceded. City Attorney Kane then outlined the changes and
read the title of Ordinance No. 106.
MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez
seconded a motion to waive further reading and declare Ordinance No.
106 read in title only. The voice vote was unanimous.
MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Harper seconded
a motion to declare Ordinance No. 106 introduced and read for the
first time. The voice vote was unanimous.
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS were not considered by the Council:
11.J. Consider proposed State _Legislation concerning mandatory
motorcycle helmet law.
11.K. Consideration of _b__a_n_ on- s-ale _and/or possession of semi
automatic weapons.
11.L. Report from City Attorney regarding Comprehensive Planning
Ordinance /voter approval_ of land use chann es._
11.M. Consideration of Cit_v activities and projects.
12. ORDINANCES
No additional ordinances were presented for consideration.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 13 February 15, 1989
13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
No future Agenda Items were requested.
14. CLOSED SESSION
MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Harper
seconded a motion to go into Closed Session under items 14.A. -
Personnel; 14.D. - Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(b)(1); 14.E. - Potential litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(c); 14.F. - Negotiation for real
property at 280 Casey Road (former high school site - Moorpark
Unified School District) pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.8; 14.G. - Negotiation for real property on a portion of
Community Focus area of PC -3 (Urban West Communities) pursuant to
Government Code Section 94956.8; and 14.H. - Negotiation for real
property known as Arroyo Vista Community Park with Fedele /Braun
pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. The voice vote was
unanimous. The time of adjournment to Closed Session was 10:22 p.m.
All Councilmembers; Steven Kueny, City Manager; and Cheryl Kane,
City Attorney, were present in the Closed Session.
The Council recessed from Closed Session at the hour of 11:51 p.m.
The Council reconvened into Open Session at the hour of 11:54 p.m.
BY CONSENSUS, the Council determined to address the following items:
14. F. Negotiation for real property at 280 Casey Road (former
high school site - Moorpark Unified School District) pursuant
to Government Code Section 54956.8.
MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez
seconded a motion to reject the proposal of the Moorpark Unified
School District concerning the Casey Road School Site as submitted
in their letter of February 9, 1989. The motion carried by a
unanimous roll call vote.
14. CLOSED SESSION
BY CONSENSUS, the Council determined to go into Closed Session under
items 14.A. - Personnel; 14.D. - Potential litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1); 14.E. - Potential litigation
pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c); 14.G. - Negotiation
for real property on a portion of Community Focus area of PC -3
(Urban West Communities) pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.8; and 14.H. - Negotiation for real property known as Arroyo
Vista Community Park with Fedele /Braun pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8. The time of adjournment to Closed Session was
12:01 a.m. All Councilmembers; Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl
Kane, City Attorney; and Pat Richards, Director of Community
Development were present in the Closed Session.
The Council reconvened into open session at the hour of 1:07 a.m.
City Attorney Cheryl Kane advised that only items 14.D., 14.G. and
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California Page 14
February 15, 1989
14.H. were discussed, and no action was taken as a result of the
Closed Session.
15. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Perez
seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at the hour of 1:09 a.m.
The voice vote was unanimous.
ATTEST:
Richard Hare, City Cle
E oise Brown, Mayor