Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1988 0914 RDA REGMINUTES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Moorpark, California _ _ _September 14.1988 The special meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark, California was held on September 14, 1988 in the Council Chambers of City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 10:37 p.m. by Chairman John Patrick Lane. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Agency Members Eloise Brown, John Galloway, Clint Harper, Bernardo Perez and Chairman John Patrick Lane. Steven Kueny, Executive Director; Cheryl Kane, Agency Counsel; and Maureen W. Wall, Secretary. 3. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA: MOTION: Agency Member Galloway moved and Agency Member Brown seconded a motion to continue the Redevelopment Agency meeting to 10:00 p.m. on September 14, 1988. The motion was approved with Agency Member Harper voting no. The time of recess was 7:12 p.m. AT 10:38 P.M., THE FULL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECONVENED. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Approve the minutes of the Redevelopment Agency for the meeting of August 23, 1988. Staff recommended the Agency approve the minutes as presented. MOTION: Agency Member Brown moved and Agency Member Galloway seconded a motion to approve the minutes as presented. The voice vote was unanimous, with Agency Member Perez abstaining since he did not attend the meeting of August 23, 1988. 5. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS: A. Consider recommendations of the Redevelopment Ad Hoc Committee and Agency's requirements. Staff recommended the Agency direct staff as deemed appropriate. Agency Member Harper commented he felt the rankings made by the ad hoc committee of the prioritization of potential improvements and projects was good. He felt the City Council should sit as the Redevelopment Agency Board with a strong citizen group Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency Moorpark, California 2 _.__Seetember 14, 1K4 established to keep the Board on track. In this way the Board can move ahead quickly on badly needed projects. The Agency Members agreed. MOTION: Chairman Lane moved and Agency Member Harper seconded a motion to recommend to the City Council that the City Council continue to act as the Board of the Redevelopment Agency. The motion was approved with Agency Member Galloway voting no. Agency Member Galloway commented he voting no because it was not clear that this action would not be misunderstood as a recommendation to implement redevelopment in the City of Moorpark. MOTION: Agency Member Harper moved and Agency Member Perez seconded a motion to recommend to the City Council that each Councilmember appoint a member to the Project Area Committee (PAC) which is to be comprised of people who were within the recommended project area boundaries, that the authority of this committee be expanded to include making recommendations to the City Council on types of projects and methods of financing, and that those recommendations made by the PAC could only be changed by a 2 /3rds majority vote of the Council. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Agency Member Galloway moved and Agency Member Brown seconded a motion that any formal adoption of redevelopment or the formation of a Project Area Committee be ratified by a vote of the people. The amendment failed with Agency Members Harper and Perez and Chairman Lane voting no. The main motion was approved with Agency Members Brown and Galloway voting no. MOTION: Agency Member Galloway moved and Agency Member Brown seconded a motion to not allow any eminent domain proceedings as part of the redevelopment plan. The voice vote was unanimous. MOTION: Agency Member Harper moved and Agency Member Perez seconded a motion to direct staff to contact the consultant and get a revised cost estimate to produce a proposed plan which would include elimination of the power of the agency to use eminent domain. The motion was approved with Agency Member Galloway voting no. Agency Member Galloway commented he felt there should be enough time between now and when the City Council acts on the agency's recommendations to include this type of action. B. Consider the additional ro.le_.of,or the disband_ me_nt of,-__the_a_d hoc committee. Staff recommended the Agency direct staff as deemed appropriate. Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency Moorpark, California 3 _ September 14, 1988 MOTION: Agency Member Harper moved and Agency Member Perez seconded a motion to recommend to the City Council that the ad hoc committee be disbanded with letters of thanks to be sent and recommend that the Council prepare a list of five nominees to appoint to the Project Area Committee. The motion was approved with Agency Members Brown and Galloway voting no. Agency Members Brown and Galloway both felt the committee should not be disbanded until after the PAC had been formed. Additionally, Agency Member Galloway felt there were already misunderstanding concerning the recommendations made by the ad hoc committee. He also commented there were terms upon which he would support redevelopment. 6. ADJOURNMENT OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: MOTION: Agency Member Perez moved and Agency Member Harper seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The voice vote was unanimous. The time of adjournment was 11:13 p.m. FRII' ATTEST: