HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1996 1204 RDA REGMINUTES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Moorpark, California December 4, 1996
A Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Moorpark was held on December 4, 1996, in the Council Chambers of
said City located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Hunter at 9:10
p.m.
2. ROLL CALL:
Present: Agency Members Evans, Perez, Rodgers Teasley,
Wozniak and Chairman Hunter
Staff Present: Steven Kueny, Executive Director; Richard
Hare, Agency Treasurer; Cheryl Kane, Agency
Counsel; Steve Hayes; Economic
Development /Redevelopment Agency Manager;
Charles Abbott, City Engineer; Martin Cole,
Management Analyst; Ken Gilbert, Director of
Public Works; Captain Mike Lewis, Sheriff's
Department; Mary Lindley, Assistant to the
City Manager; Dirk Lovett, Assistant City
Engineer, Nelson Miller, Director of
Community Development; Don Reynolds,
Administrative Services Manager; Baldemar
Troche, Management Analyst; Dorothy
Vandaveer, Deputy City Clerk; Susan Meyer,
Records Clerk
3. PUBLIC COMMENT:
None.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ROLL CALL VOTE)
MOTION: Agency Member Wozniak moved and Agency Member Evans
seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar. The
motion carried by unanimous roll call vote.
A. Consider Approval of Minutes of the Special Meeting of
the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency of November 6, 1996.
Consider Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency of November 6, 1996.
Staff Recommendation: Approve the minutes as processed.
Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency
Moorpark, California Page 2
5. PRESENTATIONS /ACTION /DISCUSSION:
December 4, 1996
A. Consider Proposals for Development of Gisler field
Housing Project. Staff Recommendation: That Alternate
No. 6 be accepted and that the staff be authorized to
proceed with a negotiated project for the development
of Gisler Field with the developers listed above.
Mr. Hayes gave the staff report.
Karen Flock, representing Cabrillo Economic Development
Corporation spoke regarding their proposal. She said
she hopes the City will go forward with this project.
Chairman Hunter stated that he supports Alternate No. 6
if a sliding scale can be produced to relate the
increase in density to the rate of return the Agency
will experience and what amenities are most cost
prohibitive for the project.
Agency Member
driving force
is to find out
the site. He
No. 6.
Perez said low income housing is the
in this project. He said his objective
how many units can be feasibly placed on
stated that he also supports Alternate
Mr. Kueny suggested that the Agency may want to: 1)
confirm that the intent is that the units along the
west side are to be single family detached for sale
homes; 2) set the maximum density of eight units per
acre; 3) explore amenities being removed and how the
elimination of each amenity would affect the project;
4) how the project would address the housing
requirements of redevelopment law; and 5) show how the
project would maximize the number of low income units.
MOTION: Agency Member Perez moved and Agency Member Wozniak
seconded a motion to 1)directing staff to proceed with
negotiations with developers as stated in Alternate No. 6 in
the staff report dated November 14, 1996, and the developers
are to include Braemar, Cabrillo Economic Development
Corporation, Colmer Development Co., and West Ventures; 2)
that only single family single story detached units be
constructed along the west property line; 3) to explore
amenities suggested for removal and how the elimination of
each one affects the overall project; 4) that at a minimum,
i •!
Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency
Moorpark, California Page 3
December 4, 1996
the project shall meet the low and very low income unit
requirements of applicable law and that these units can be
provided on site or off site as long as they are in the
Project Area; and 5) that the developer attempt to have a
maximum density of 8 units per acre for this project; if
higher density is proposed, the developer shall justify the
need to increase the density and develop a scale showing
impacts of increased densities and benefits of increased
densities. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
B. Consider 1) Grantinq /Accepting Property for Poindexter
Park and for a Street Along Th Westerly Boundary of
Said Park; and 2) Gravel Road Maintenance for
Poindexter Park. Staff Recommendation: Approve
granting to the City of Moorpark certain property known
as Poindexter Park and the future street to be
constructed adjacent thereto.
Ken Gilbert gave the staff report.
MOTION: Agency Member Perez moved and Agency Member
Wozniak seconded a motion to approve granting to the
City of Moorpark certain property known as Poindexter
Park and the future street to be constructed adjacent
thereto. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote.
6. ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION: Agency Member Perez moved and Agency Member Wozniak
seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion
carried by unanimous voice vote.
The time was 9:51 p.m.
ATTEST: