HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1989 0201 RDA REGMINUTES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Moorpark, California
February 1, 1989
A Special Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark,
California was held on February 1, 1989 in the Council Chambers of City
Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Meeting was called to order at 6:42 p.m. by Chairman Eloise
Brown.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was deferred until the start of the City
Council Meeting.
3. ROLL CALL
Present: Agency Members Clint Harper, Paul Lawrason, Scott
Montgomery, Bernardo Perez and Chairman Brown.
Steven Kueny, Executive Director; Richard Hare, Treasurer;
Cand Sally Coons, Recording Secretary.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
No persons were present to speak under Public Comments.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION: Upon motion by Agency Member Lawrason, seconded by Agency
Member Perez, the following items were approved by a unanimous roll
call vote:
A. Approval of the warrant register:
- Payable Warrant No. 107 and 108 $15,851.99
B. Consider approval _of minutes for __t_h_e_R_e_development Agency
Meeting of November 16,_19.88.
6. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS:
A. Consider adoption of Resolution No. 89 -3 approving the
preliminary report for the Moorpark_Redevelopment Project:
i Executive Director Kueny advised that the preliminary report
for the Moorpark Redevelopment Project was being presented for
the Agency's consideration this date. He requested that it be
�- approved with the condition that Staff be authorized to make
minor text changes that woulri not change the intent.
Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency
Moorpark, California Page 2 February 1, 1989
Consultants from Urban Futures, Jack Siegel and John Huffman,
were present to answer questions.
Mr. Huffman advised that the targeted date for adoption of the
final report for the Moorpark Redevelopment Project was June
28, 1989. Mr. Siegel commented that within the overall
project, there is about a two -week period which allows for any
unforeseen delays. He further advised that adoption of the
Preliminary Report starts the review period for appropriate
taxing agencies and county officials; however changes can be
made to the document up until the projected time of adoption of
the final Report in June, 1989.
The Agency Board requested figures in the traffic summaries be
updated with 1988 figures; that Figure 2, Page 11, more clearly
show boundaries of sub areas in the City; that reconsideration
be given to Page 44, Dam Inundation, since it seems to be in
conflict regarding the safety element; Page 54, last bar on
graph should be dated; and that Page 40, Table 7, should
contain latest accident rate statistics.
Mr. Huffman advised that the Project Area Committee (PAC) can
become involved as soon as they can be brought together. The
primary focus of the PAC will be to review the Redevelopment
t
Plan and recommend to the Council /Agency.
MOTION: Agency Member Perez moved and Agency Member Montgomery
seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 89 -3 approving the
preliminary report with incorporation of changes as indicated by the
Agency Board; and to authorize Staff to make minor modifications to
text, which do not change the intent. The voice vote was unanimous.
7. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
No future agenda items were requested.
8. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Agency Member Montgomery moved and Agency Member Perez
seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting of the Redevelopment Agency
at the hour of 6:58 p.m. The voice vote was unanimous.
Eloise Brown. Chairman