HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN 1989 0503 RDA SPCor
MINUTES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Moorpark, California
May 3, 1989
A Special Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moorpark,
California was held on May 3, 1989 in the Council Chambers of City Hall of
said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Meeting was called to order at the hour of 6:10 p.m. by Chairman
Eloise Brown.
Z. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
By consensus, the Agency determined to dispense with the Pledge of
Allegiance.
r 3. ROLL CALL
-_ Present: Agency Members Clint Harper, Paul Lawrason, Scott
Montgomery, Bernardo Perez and Chairman Brown.
Steven Kueny, Executive Director; Richard Hare, Treasurer;
Cheryl Kane, Agency Attorney; Susan Cauldwell,
Administrative Assistant; Marshall Linn and John Huffman,
Urban Futures; and Sally Coons, Secretary.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
No persons were present to speak under public comments.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION: Upon motion by Agency Member Harper and second by Agency
Member Lawrason, the following items were approved by an unanimous
roll call vote:
A. Consider approval of minutes _for _the Redevelopment Agency
Meeting of March 15, 1989. Staff recommended the minutes be
approved as presented.
B. Consider approval of Warrant Register 1988/89:
- Payable Warrants Nos. 109 -111 $19,353.96
C. Consider adoption of Resolution No_. 89-5 _authorizinq_ajoint
- public_ hearing _of the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency with the
Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency
Moorpark, California Page 2
May 3, 1989
City Council of the_ City of Moorpark_ for June_ 7,_1989_ Staff
recommended adoption of Resolution No. 89 -5.
6. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS
A. Consider adoption of Resolution No. 89 -6 approving rules
governing participation and preferences for owners, operators
of businesses and tenants. Staff recommended adoption of
Resolution No. 89 -6.
MOTION: Agency Member Harper moved and Agency Member Lawrason
seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 89 -6. The voice vote was
unanimous.
B. Consider adoption of Resolution No. 89 -7 approving and adopting
relocation assistance guidelines. Staff recommended adoption
of Resolution No. 89 -7.
In response to Agency Member Harper's concern regarding the
inclusion of eminent domain for residential properties,
Marshall Linn, City's redevelopment consultant, advised that it
had been the experience of his firm that those city's which
elected to limit their power of emininent domain, later
regreted it.
Executive Director Kueny advised the Agency that the Project
Area Committee voted unanimously to recommend to the Agency the
adoption of the plan, including the full range of eminent
domain powers. The PAC felt the Agency would use these powers
only when absolutely necessary.
Agency Member Harper recommended that the power of eminent
domain exclude those residential properties that are consistent
with zoning and land use designations on the General Plan.
Executive Director Kueny advised that it would not be
appropriate for the Council to act on this matter since it is
not an Agenda item, but will be considered as part of the Plan
at the hearing on June 7, 1989.
MOTION: Agency Member Lawrason moved and Agency Member Harper
seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 89 -7. The voice vote was
unanimous.
Executive Director Kueny advised that prior to the hearing on
June 7, 1989, Staff would try to ascertain the number of
non - conforming residences and their locations; whether owner
occupied at time of adoption of the zoning ordinance when it
became a non - conforming use; and those that are presently owner
occupied.
Minutes of the Redevelopment Agency
Moorpark, California Page 3
f" '
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
May 3, 1989
In response to Agency Member Harper, Executive Director Kueny
advised that By -Laws of the Project Area Committee will be presented
to the Council for review and approval, after the Redevelopment Plan
is adopted. These By -Laws will he in a format similar to Ordinance
No. 33 which governs the Park and Recreation Commission and the
Planning Commission but will be presented as a resolution.
8. CLOSED SESSION
MOTION: Agency Member Montgomery moved and Agency Member Harper
seconded a motion to adjourn into Closed Session at the hour of 6:33
p.m. for discussion of the following item: A. Potential Litigation
pursuant to Government Code___S_e__ction _5.9456_.9(_�JCD_ The voice vote
was unanimous.
Present in the Closed Session were Agency Members Harper, Lawrason,
Montgomery, Perez and Chairman Brown. Also present were Executive
Director Steven Kueny; Agency Attorney Cheryl Kane; Treasurer
Richard Hare; consultants from Urban Futures, Marshall Linn and John
Huffman.
The Meeting reconvened into open session at the hour of 6:55 p.m.
Agency Attorney Kane advised that Potential Litigation under
Government Code Section 59456.9(b)(1) was discussed, after the
Agency determined to remain in Closed Session under Government Code
Section 59456.9(b)(2). She further advised there were no
announcements as a result of the Closed Session.
9. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Agency Member Harper moved and Agency Member Montgomery
seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at the hour of 6:57 p.m.
The voice vote was unanimous.
/ 1 L
Eloise Brown, Chairman
ATTEST:
�: �' Z Ct - --- �L_ -, L- -
Steven Kueny, Executive Director