The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES CC 1992 854 1992 0520RESOLUTION NO. 92 -854 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, FOR "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1992 AND ENDING JUNE 301 1993. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 92 -829, the City Council ordered the City Manager to cause to be prepared an Engineer's Report in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code; and, WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 92 -850, the City Council ordered the Engineer to include in the aforesaid report, recommendations pertaining to the proposed annexation of certain parcels to "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -2n, and the creation of a new zone of benefit within said district; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolutions, said Engineer's Report was filed with the City Clerk on the 20th day of May, 1992; and, WHEREAS, the City Clerk has submitted the report to the City Council and the City Council has now reviewed and examined the report as so submitted. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Engineer's Report for "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1992 and ending June 30, 1993 prepared pursuant to Resolution Nos. 92 -829 and 92- 850, filed with the City Clerk on the 20th day of May, 1992 is hereby approved. SECTION 2. That said Engineer's Report may be further modified or changed, pursuant to the provisions of Section 22630 of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20th day of 2Y , 1992. ATTEST: City Cl W. Lzfwrason Jr., MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS. CITY OF MOORPARK ) I, Lillian E. Kellerman, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 92 -854 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on the 20th day of MAY , 1992, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS MONTGOMERY, PEREZ, TALLEY, WOZNIAK AND MAYOR LAWRASON NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 21st day of MAY 1992. �dillian E. K 1 rman PAUL W LAWRASON JR JOHN E. WOZNIAK SCOTT MONTGOMERY BERNARDO M PEREZ ROY E. TALLEY JR. Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Printed On 1?ecyc1e ^, Paoer T I ' y '`4: I: I J J J O t AM w0 g ms 0 o u a r - Jr •+ 'F r 1 '. _�:_: :. "�i ='ra:.:::1 ==, �'I:!, _.. - _ tr�ilRt Pi :v}}�; •I �Ey';�d['�, %" f `` , tl!,I';ILaII�IIIV. �j'.�,1 t•',, j: i 'j':" ' �• <• '' .M1':. �,� t j Fl- tit �..nl of a� �';��y�J!'dC. =1�� •L ,1 1 r! t .. ` � I , I - IiI ( � I)11NF�� 1 �J `� � � 1��••� I _ 1 [ ^ „�'i. 'I';: ;u,• +, -,� _ _'j�slll`Inu�a � 9j:,71:: �H,�;� '•;,Y :: �:'i ' -.._ ( -- j i � -'�� -1 .,.��C!!1'!_+�YI�6�"r .`wh�i' �.LF ii ... ....t! r it � ::.. 17 $ IW +P� f.•x„� _ �A k:�.r 1%cr:. t "J. -i] *��i S�� 1 tq�•�•)1?�F�Ii �f �{'1'�', �;�Y'^r! r,_:: -:.. ] i II ,a ->51 i ,+ .•'a+ssr 1 lll” F,I S °: ,';�•'a.. ' ' •i, ° '•- r�:�4aK�i 1„ N EJ91 :LC �.. I.14 ,� � ` t� t �xl ( r r U' J t i , /• a � %l�yi:;4,��rr�.=+. \�h,. S.T1.�E. (• ,'io zt eV t f t tt f�~ 1, All LT' ) ? ' � 1� ' • ' 4 ark ,N �}�I�''� � � ifU �N!lil ' , J ,use_ � 11Fti� t _ ..JI•• .I "..A% t. " t,� f, ' I�t I {j J:. ��l1��I (fl.� —\ `:�t� S S � I �nP�l ., {.,•' �! T! `•xt d -t!''S 1 ' �. I I �.+ '14��i! irfiea L�61tNw 1i17 ' tl ` C = =� �.•� • ^• ., � � r „ �"4.. �.� � , I I Yal,;: 4, �!�� ! III �� rJl%'tf }E]t�Y1i f1"�r '1 -- �= •..� -�.\E, - _ .,: " .� , 1 ,. _I Il�l��G',I hlli� f11 ,.>l:: -. S ,q` i, J••• -`._. J.-S ^ ,.• �' 11 C II I III,I�II�,u4i�� _�•` / f ` u _' t 444 " t i ";•:.:., jftt I , 1 I !! EXHIBIT "B" AD 84 -2 05/01/92 Fund 23 Activity --= -= -----= = --= FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY FY --------------- - - - - -- Proposed Description 1989/90 1990 /91 Budget Proj Actual Budget Notes: BEGINNING BALANCE 234,410 288,631 267,825 264,890 287,085 REVENUE 352,236 379,704 324,408 337,319 436,925 Less Refunds (22,100) Plus Developer Fees 6,964 Pius Misc. (3,181) 5,070 Plus Fund Transfer 4,999 7,153 Total Revenue 331,954 398,891 337,319 AVAILABLE FUNDS 566,364 687,522 592,233 602,209 724,010 EXPENSES Personnel 16,166 17,171 17,602 17,602 0 &M ZONES OF BEBEFIT 74,627 97,433 148,806 CITY WIDE BEBEFIT Professional Services Assessment Engineering 3,161 7,000 Water Conservation 6,000 Contract Maintenance 84,801 Maintenance Areas 35,323 45,295 32,581 Miscellaneous Maintenance 34,000 5,000 36,000 Utilities 239,244 Street Lighting Energy 200,000 213,048 230,000 Irrigation Water 11,320 13,789 9,450 Irrigation Energy 4,840 740 1,380 Other Misc Expenses 3,114 --- - - - - -- 3,268 --- - - - - -- 8,650 ---- (16,706) 0 & M Sub-Total 330,320 363,378 - - - - -- 286,522 ---- - - - - -- 454,511 Capital Improvements 76,601 217,455 11,000 206,455 Less TOTAL EXPENSES --- - - - - -- 277,733 --- - - - - -- 423,087 --- - - - - -- 598,004 ---- - - - - -- 315,124 ---- - - - - -- 678,568 Transfer from Gann Fund 455 YEAR END BALANCE 288,631 264,890 (5,771) 287,085 - 45,442- EXHIBIT "C" Department 143 Budget Summary Code Description - - - -- ---------------------- ----- ---------------- - - - - -- SALARIES & BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 623 Supplies 624 Postage 626 Printing 637 Travel & Milage 641 Professional Services L/S Design Assmnt Engineering Water Conservation 641 Total 642 Contractual Services Zone Maintenance City Wide Maint. Areas Miscellaneous Maint. 642 Total 652 Utilities Street Lights L/S Power L/S Water 652 Total 654 Vehicle Maint 655 Fuel 658 Maint & Repair 661 Equip. Rental M &O Total 903 Capital Projects FY 91/92 05/01/92 ------------------------------- Estimated Actual FY 92/93 BUDGET FY 89/90 FY 90/91 -------------- - - - - -- ----------------- - - - - -- ACTUAL --- - - - - -- --------- ACTUAL --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- BUDGET --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Detail --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Total --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Detail --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Total ----- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 6,516 16,166 17,171 -- 15,360 -- 17,602 933 509 2,000 -- 1,890 -- 2,000 971 217 2,100 -- 2,080 -- 2,100 307 321 0 -- 0 -- 0 0 233 200 -- 230 -- 200 20,000 10,000 7,000 6,000 5,485 3,161 16,978 10,000 33,000 97,433 57,260 45,295 32,581 5,000 36,000 59,720 84,801 98,100 147,728 125,841 215,000 230,000 2,090 2,790 56,690 51,880 194,677 239,244 239,300 273,780 284,670 150 0 1,000 -- 1,300 -- 2,500 629 1,609 1,200 -- 1,250 -- 1,200 1,352 225 2,500 -- 1,900 -- 2,000 837 0 0 -- 0 -- 1,000 265,061 330,320 363,378 440,158 454,511 6,156 76,601 217,455 11,000 206,455 277,733 423,087 598,004 466,518 678,568 EXHIBIT "D" (1 of 4) SUMMARY of FY 1991/92 Projected Actual Expenses No. Description - -- ----- - - - - -- --- ----- - - - - -- ZONES OF BENEFIT 1 Tract 2851 2 Tract 2865 3 Tract 3032 4 T3274 Williams Ranch Rd 5 Tracts 3019/3025 6 'T3306 Glenhaven 7 L A Ave Parkway 8 Buffer Park 9 Peach Hill Wash Linear Park Sub -Total Zones of Benefit CITY WIDE BENEFIT --------------- -- Maintenance Areas (1 -17) Miscellaneous Maintenance Miscellaneous Improvements Sub -Total City Wide Benefit GRAND TOTAL ---------------------------------- - - - - -- 05/01/92 FY1991/92 Anticipated Year End Expenses ------------------------------------------------------------- Manintenance Costs Utility Costs FY1991/92 --- ---- --------- ------ - - - - -- - ---- ------- - - - --- Total Carry Budget Contract Rplcmnt Total Water Electr. Cost Over --- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- --------- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 6,773 32,419 2,978 5,930 24,355 1,452 720 0 0 74,627 51,483 34,000 217,455 302,938 377,565 3,250 200 3,450 24,520 400 24,920 1,560 300 1,860 3,090 0 3,090 19,100 200 19,300 562 0 562 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52,082 1,100 53,182 29,366 1,400 30,766 29,366 1,400 30,766 81,448 2,500 83,948 1,808 240 21,159 700 192 0 255 140 19,412 130 75 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 42,901 1,350 13,789 740 13,789 740 56,690 2,090 5,498 46,779 2,052 3,485 38,842 777 0 0 0 97,433 45,295 5,000 11,000 61,295 158,728 1,275 (14,360) 926 2,445 (14,487) 675 720 0 0 (22,806) 6,188 29,000 35,188 EXHIBIT "D" (2 of 4) Fiscal Year 1991 /92 Projected Actual Expenses 05/01/92 ZONES OF BENEFIT -- COST DETAIL No. Description - -- -------------------- - - - - -- ZONES OF BENEFIT -- COST DETAIL ------------------------------ 1 T2851: Bambi /Benwood /Pecan Flood Control Channel 2 ' T2865: S/S T. R. Slope /Prkwy (Pacifica) S/S T. R. Slope /Prkwy (Pardee) N/S T. R. Prkway (Pardee) N/S T. R. E/0 Sthmptn Planter HIS T. R. Prkwy (Pacifica) Christian Barrett & Spring Peach Hill (East Side) 3 T 3032: Buttercreek Entry Peppermill Prkwy 4 T3274 Williams Ranch Rd N/S & S/S Prkwys Landscape Barrier 5 T 3019/T3025 T. R. Slope /Streetscape N/S T. R. Parkway Peach Hill - W/S 6 T3306: Inglewood (Glenhaven) 7 Parkway N/S L. A. Ave E/0 Gabbert 8 West Village Buffer Park 9 Peach Hill Wash Linear Park PY1991/92 Anticipated Year End Expenses ------------------------------------------------------------- Manintenance Costs Utility Costs FY1991/92 ---------------------- - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- Total Carry Budget Contract Rplcmnt Total Water Electr. Cost Over 5,783 990 6,773 6,944 6,944 2,720 9,230 0 2,820 3,761 32,419 1,569 1,409 2,978 5,130 800 5,930 12,490 10,125 1,740 24,355 1,452 720 0 0 3,250 200 3,450 0 1,808 0 3,250 200 3,450 0 0 0 0 1,747 0 > 24520 400 24,920 700 87 0 105 0 0 0 255 0 24,520 400 24,920 1,560 300 1,860 0 1,560 300 1,860 3090 3,090 0 3,090 0 3,090 0''I > 19,100 200 19,300 0 19,100 200 19,300 562 562 0 0 0 Sub -Total Zones of Benefit I 74,627 I 52,082 1,100 - 53,182 1,808 240 0 1,808 240 11,682 700 0 0 0 7,260 1,747 470 21,159 700 87 0 105 0 192 0 255 140 255 140 11,682 130 7,260 470 19,412 130 75 140 42,901 1,350 , 5,498 0 ---- - - - - -- 5,498 I i 12,382 0 0 24,920 7,260 1,747 470 46,779 1,947 105 2,052 3,485 0 3,485 11,812 26,560 470 38,842 777 0 0 0 97,433 i 285 990 ----- - - - - -- 1,275 (5,438) 6,944 2,720 (15,690) (7,260) 1,073 3,291 (14,360) (378) 1,304 926 1,645 800 2,445 678 (16,435) 1,270 (14,487) 675 720 0 0 (22,806) EXHIBIT "D" (3 of 4) Atcal Year 1991 /92 Projected Actual Expenses CITY WIDE BENEFIT -- COST DETAIL 05/01/92 FY1991/92 Anticipated Year End Expenses ------------------------------------------------------------- Manintenance Costs Utility Costs ---------------------- - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- Total Carry Contract Rplcmnt Total Water Electr. Cost Over -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- -------- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 3,530 200 3,730 909 100 1,009 4,543 100 FY1991/92 No. - -- --- Description ---------------------------- - - - - -- ---------------------------- - - - - -- Budget --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- A. Maintenance Areas 0 -------------------- 1 Tract 2851: Campus Park & Collins 5,456 0 Pkwy: W/S Collins N10 C. P. 0 909 Pkwy: N/S Cmp Prk W/O Collins 1,009 2,621 C. P. Median: Collins to Pecan 2,821 2 'Tract 4170: Campus Park Median 2,154 1,986 Princeton to Julliard 2,186 3 Campus Park Med. (Marq. to Julyd) 6,885 4 Parkways: Both sides of Princeton 4,776 0 (6 mos.) 0 5 Medians: Princeton (6 Mos.) 4,763 6 Parkways: Poindexter / Sierra 1,371 (6 mos.) 0 7 Community Center Parkway 1,156 8 S/W Corner Spring Rd & Peach Hill 1,609 9 Parkway: E/S Peach Hill N10 Park 3,840 10 Parkway: Pch Hill E/0 Mesa Verde 0 11 T. R. Medians (N /0 Harvester) 3,213 12 T. R. Med. (Harvester to Bridge) 990 13 T. R. Med. (Bridge to Mt. Meadow) 0 14 T. R. Ned (Mt. Mdw. to Ed. Esmnt) 0 15 T. R. Ned (Ed. Esmnt to Pch Hill) 5,590 16 T. R. Med (Pch Hill to Spring) 9,680 17 T. R. Ned (W /O Spring to Spring) 0 Sub -Total Maintenance Areas 51,483 05/01/92 FY1991/92 Anticipated Year End Expenses ------------------------------------------------------------- Manintenance Costs Utility Costs ---------------------- - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- Total Carry Contract Rplcmnt Total Water Electr. Cost Over -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- -------- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- 3,530 200 3,730 909 100 1,009 4,543 100 4,643 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 909 100 1,009 2,621 200 2,821 0 0 1,986 200 2,186 540 540 0 0 0 0 3,720 200 3,920 10,608 300 10,908 0 -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -------- 29,366 1,400 30,766 170 3,900 240 130 1,379 1,032 200 215 470 0 668 0 0 0 7,260 3,704 130 130 80 60 40 -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- 13,789 740 5,805 0 0 0 200 1,224 3,291 0 2,984 620 0 0 11,240 14,652 0 0 45,295 1,556 775 1,080 4,776 4,763 1,371 956 385 549 0 229 370 0 0 (5,650) (4,972) 0 0 6,188 EXHIBIT "D" (4 of 4) Fiscal Year 1991 /92 Projected Actual Expenses CITY WIDE BENEFIT -- COST DETAIL No. Description B. Miscellaneous Maintenance -------------------------- 1 Pepper Tree Spraying 2 Tree Removal / Replacement 3 Tree Trimming 4 Weed Abatement 'Sub -Total Misc. Maintenance TOTAL CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE CARRY OVERS (Sec. A & B) 05/01/92 FY1991/92 ------------------------------- Projected Carry Budget Expenses Over 4,000 1,500 2,500 12,000 1,500 10,500 15,000 1,000 14,000 3,000 1,000 2,000 34,000 1, 5,000 1 29,000 ...................... ............................... 35,188 ------------------------------ C. Miscellaneous Improvements II ------------------------ - - - - -- Fundin Source I No. Description 1 Prkwy: Shasta /Los Angeles Ave 2 Prkwy: Princeton 3 Prkwy: E/S Pch Hill S/0 Mesa Verde 4 Prkwy: Poindexter E/0 & W/0 Sierra 5 Prkwy: S/S L. A. E/0 Tierra Rejada 6 Prkwy: Pch Hill E/0 Mesa Verde 7 Prkwy: S/S Cmps Prk E/0 Princeton 8 Prkwy: N/S & S/S C. P. W/O Prncton 9 Prkwy Mod: T. R. S/0 L. A. Ave 10 Prkwy Mod: W/S Sprng S/0 Pch Hill 11 Prkwy: EIS Sprnq S/0 Pch Hill 12 Median: Princeton 13 High Street Landscaping 14 Prkwy: N/S T. R. Pch Hill to Sprng Sub -Total Misc. Improvements 9 --------------------------------------------------- Prior Pr Yrs Surplus Years' Maint. T. R. Rd FY1991/92 Carry Assmnt Developer Improv Assmnts Overs Surplus Deposits Assmnt 0 8,017 1,983 0 15,000 0 7,145 7,855 0 8,500 17,000 0 10,162 7,153 0 20,000 0 14,000 0 0 5,000 0 1,000 0 1,000 0 19,000 0 20,000 0 54,640 0 38,662 100,000 24,153 54,640 FY1991/92 ---------------------------------- Carry Budget Expended Over 10,000 15,000 15,000 25,500 17,315 20,000 14,000 0' 5,000 1,000 1,000 19,000 20,000 54,640 217,455 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 1,000 1,000 11,000 9,000 15,000 14,000 24,500 17,315 19,000 14,000 0 0 1,000 0 19,000 19,000 54,640 206,455 EXHIBIT "E" (1 of 4) Landscape Maintenance Costs Projection Fiscal Year 1992/93 No. Description - -- ----------------------- --- ----------------- - - - - -- ZONES OF BENEFIT 1 Tract 2851: Benwood /Bambi /Pecan 2 Tract 2865: Pacifica /Pardee 3 Tract 3032: Buttercreek / Peppermill 4 Tract 3274: Williams Ranch Rd 5 Tract 3019 & Tract 3025 6 Tract 3306: Glenhaven (Inglewood) 7 N/S Los Angeles Ave (West] Parkways 8 West Village Buffer Area 9 Peach Hill Drain Linear Park SUB -TOTAL ZONES OF BENEFIT CITY WIDE BENEFIT ------------- - - - - -- No. Description - -- --------------------------------- City Wide Benefit ------------------ A. Maintenance Areas (1 -17) B. Miscellaneous Maintenance C. Miscellaneous Improvements SUBTOTAL CITYWIDE BENEFIT GRAND TOTAL 05/01/92 FY 1992/93 Recommended Budget --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Costs Utility Costs LESS ------------- - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- SUB- FY 1991/92 Contract Replcmnt Water Electr. TOTAL Carry Over TOTAL --- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- --------- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- 3,500 500 1,800 250 6,050 1,275 4,775 26,000 2,000 20,600 800 49,400 (14,360) 63,760 1,580 500 190 0 2,270 926 1,344 3,200 500 260 160 4,120 2,445 1,675 19,200 1,000 19,500 150 39,850 (14,487) 54,337 580 200 80 0 860 675 185 3,200 200 0 50 3,450 720 2,730 0 0 0 0 20,000 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57,260 4,900 42,430 1,410 1 126,000 (22,806) 1 148,806 Maintenance Costs Utility Costs ------------- - - - - -- --------------- - -- Contract Replcmnt Water Electr. TOTAL Remarks 32581 3550 9450 1380 36000 -- -- -- --- - - - - -- 68,581 -- - - - - -- 3,550 -- - - - - -- 9,450 -- - - - - -- 1,380 --- - - - - -- 125,841 -- - - - - -- 8,450 -- - - - - -- 51,880 -- - - - - -- 2,790 46,961 36,000 206,455 289,416 415,416 EXHIBIT "E" (2 of 4) Landscape Maintenance Costs Projection Fiscal Year 1991/92 No. Description - -- ----------------- - - - - -- ZONES OF BENEFIT -- COST DETAIL 1 Tract 2851: Bambi /Benwood /Pecan Flood Control Channel 2 Tract 2865: S/S T. R. Slope /Streeet (Pacifica) S/S T. R. Slope /Streeet (Pardee) N/S T. R. Parkway (Pardee) N/S T. R. E/0 Southampton Planter N/S T. R. Parkway (Pacifica) Christian Barrett & Spring EIS Peach Hill Prkwy (C. B. to T. R.) 3 Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry \ S/E Peppermill Parkway 4 Tract 3274: Williams Ranch Rd N/S Parkway S/S Parkway Landscape Barrier 5 Tract 3019 & Tract 3025: Warmington W/S Peach Hill Rd (Wm Rnch to T. R.) S/S T. R. Slope /Streeet N/S T. R. Parkway 6 Tract 3306: Glenhaven (Inglewood) 7 Parkway HIS L.A. Ave E/0 Gabbert 8 West Village Buffer 8 Peach Hill Wash Linear Park Sub -Total Zones of Benefit FY 1992/93 Recommended Budget ----------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Costs Utility Costs ------------- - - - - -- --------------- - -- Contract Replcmnt Water Electr. TOTAL Remarks 3,500 500 1,800 250 - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- 3,500 500 1,800 250 11,000 800 26,000 2,000 7,300 1,800 500 - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- 26,000 2,000 20,600 800 1,580 500 90 100 - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- 1,580 500 190 0 160 3,200 500 260 --- - - - - -- 3,200 -- - - - - -- 500 -- - - - - -- 260 -- - - - - -- 160 11,000 150 19,200 1,000 8,000 --- - 500 - - - -- 19,200 -- - - - - -- 1,000 -- - - - - -- 19,500 -- - - - - -- 150 580 200 80 0 3,200 200 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57,260 4,900 42,430 1,410 6,050 0 6,050 11,800 0 0 28,000 7,300 1,800 500 49,400 2,170 100 2,270 160 3,960 0 4,120 11,150 28,200 500 39,850 860 3,450 20,000 0 126,000 Electrical Costs paid by Performance Nursery Design costs , plus EXHIBIT "E" (3 of 4) Landscape Maintenance Costs Projection Fiscal Year 1992/93 No. Description A. Maintenance Areas -------------------- 1 Tract 2851: Campus Park & Collins Pkwy: W/S Collins N/0 C. P. Pkwy: HIS Cmp Prk W/O Collins C. P. Median: Collins to Pecan 2 Tract 4170: Campus Park Median Princeton to Julliard 3 Campus Park Ned. (Marq. to Julyd) 4 Parkways: Both sides of Princeton 5 Medians: Princeton 6 Parkways: Poindexter / Sierra 7 Community Center Parkway 8 S/E Corner Spring Rd & Peach Hill 9 S/W Corner Spring Rd & Peach Hill 10 Parkway: EIS Peach Hill N/0 Park 11 Parkway: Pch Hill E/O Mesa Verde 12 T. R. Medians (M /O Harvester) 13 T. R. Ned. (Harvester to Bridge) 14 T. R. Ned. (Bridge to Mt. Meadow) 15 T. R. Ned (Mt. Mdw. to Ed. Esmnt) 16 T. R. Ned (Ed. Esmnt to Pch Hill) 17 T. R. Ned (Pch Hill to Spring) 18 T. R. Ned (W /0 Spring to Spring) FY 1992/93 Recommended Budget Maintenance Costs Utility Costs ------------- - - - - -- --------------- - -- Contract Replcmnt Water Electr. TOTAL Remarks 3,500 300 * 180 910 100 400 140 4,543 400 1,500 140 3,000 200 1,300 120 800 20 150 80 1000 30 200 80 900 30 400 100 1,000 30 200 80 2,000 300 300 600 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,720 600 2,000 10,608 1,500 3,000 0 0 0 100 100 160 100 I 3,980 1,550 6,583 4,620 1,050 1,310 1,430 1,310 2,700 740 6,480 15,208 --- - - - - -- -- - - ---- -- - - - - -- -- - --._. ..- - - - - -- Sub -Total Maintenance Areas 32,581 3,550 9,450 1,380 46,961 Three months EXHIBIT "E" (4 of 4) Landscape Maintenance Costs Projection Fiscal Year 1992/93 No. Description B. Miscellaneous Maintenance -------------------- - - - - -- Budget Remarks 1 Pepper Tree Spraying 18,500 18,500 4,000 0 20,000 2 Tree Removal / Replacement 1,000 24,000 12,000 20,000 1,000 3 Tree Trimming 17,315 0 15,000 17,315 25,000 4 Weed Abatement 19,000 30,000 5,000 30,000 0 20,000 Sub -Total Misc. Maintenance 20,000 0 36,000 5,000 15,000 5,000 5,000 0 5,000 Total 25,000 LESS 24,000 C. Miscellaneous Improvements Proposed Less ---------------- - -- - -- TOTAL ----- --- ---- ---- ------- - -- - --- Project Prior Balance Total Inter FY 91/92 ADDITIONAL 37,640 9,000 Cost Years' Project FY 92/93 Project Carry FY 1992/93 No. Description Estimate Expenses Expenses Budget Transfer Over ASSESSMENT 1 Prkwy: Shasta /Los Angeles Ave 2 Prkwy: Princeton 3 Prkwy: E/S Pch Hill S/0 Mesa Verde 4 Prkwy: Poindexter E/0 & W/O Sierra 5 Prkwy: S/S L. A. E/0 Tierra Rejada 6 Prkwy: Pch Hill E/0 Mesa Verde 7 Prkwy: S/S Cmps Prk E/0 Princeton 8 Prkwy: N/S & S/S C. P. W/0 Prncton 9 Prkwy Mod: T. R. S/0 L. A. Ave 10 Prkwy Mod: W/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill 11 Prkwy: E/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill 12 Median: Princeton 13 High Street Landscaping 14 Prkwy: N/S T. R. Pch Hill to Sprng 15 Sunnyslope Basin (ZONE 2) 16 Repair Slope (ZONE 2) 19,500 1,000 18,500 18,500 20,000 0 20,000 10,000 25,000 1,000 24,000 25,000 20,000 1,000 19,000 19,000 17,315 0 17,315 17,315 25,000 1,000 24,000 19,000 30,000 0 30,000 0 20,000 0 20,000 0 20,000 5,000 15,000 5,000 5,000 0 5,000 5,000 25,000 1,000 24,000 14,000 30,000 0 30,000 0 20,000 1,000 19,000 19,000 37,640 0 37,640 37,640 9,000 0 9,000 9,000 8,000 0 8,000 8,000 Sub -Total Misc. Improvements 331,455 11,000 320,455 1 206,455 9,500 9,000 0 (5,000) 15,000 0 11,000 14,000 0 (5,500) 24,500 0 17,315 0 19,000 0 (14,000) 14,000 0 0 0 5,000 0 0 4,000 1,000 0 14,000 0 0 (19,000) 19,000 0 19,000 0 (17,000) 54,640 0 9,000 8,000 i --- - - - - -- 0 ---- - - - - -- 206,455 ------ - - - - -- 0 EXHIBIT F Street Light Cost Analysis ------------------------------------------------ FY 1990/91 Summary Street Traffic Signal Bate Lights Safety Lighting 03/04/92 318.18 14,704.21 15,022.39 2,024.94 02/05/92 346.27 15,300.13 15,646.40 2,450.02 01/15/92 346.27 15,562.23 15,908.50 2,085.48 12/04/91 346.27 15,033.52 15,379.79 2,143.71 11/06/91 346.27 15,026.85 15,373.12 2,082.24 10/02/91 346.27 15,095.34 15,441.61 2,965.87 Six Month Tot 92,771.81 13,752.26 12 Ho. Est. 185,543.62 27,504.52 Total 213,048.14 Say ..................... 215000 05/01/92 FY 1991 /92 Estimate ----------------------------------------------------------------- Description Per No Per Yr Total 1. Street Lights 15,600.00 187,200.00 2. Safety Lights 2500 30,000.00 217,200.00 Plus Estimated Cost for new lights ...... ............................... 3,000.00 Contingency for unanticipated rate . ............................... 12,000 232,200.00 Say ....................... 230,000.00 FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF MOORPARK PARRS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -85 -1 LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 PREPARED BY: DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES 1470 S. VALLEY VISTA DRIVE SUITE 225 August 6, 1992 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section 1 Authority for Report 1 Section 2 Description of Improvements to be Maintained 1 Section 3 Assessment Roll 2 Section 4 Estimate of Cost 2 Section 5 Method of Assessment 2 Appendix A - Parks Maintenance Formula Appendix B - Budget Estimate Appendix C - Boundary Map Appendix D - Assessment Roll Appendix E - Resolutions Appendix F - Rebate Procedure CITY OF MOORPARK Engineer's Report Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1 Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 For Fiscal Year 1992 -1993 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared pursuant to City Council action taken at their regular meeting of February 5, 1992 to extend this District for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1992 and ending June 30, 1993 in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, "Landscaping Act of 197211, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code. This report is an update of an existing City -wide Assessment District. The purpose for the district is to provide operating funds for the continued maintenance and improvements of existing and planned City operated public parks. SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED The following City Parks are to be maintained under this District effective July 1, 1992: CAMPUS PARK PAUL GRIFFIN SR. PARK MONTE VISTA NATURE PARK GLENWOOD PARK PEACH HILL PARK CAMPUS CANYON PARK SOUTH MEADOWS NORTH MEADOWS In addition, the City also owns additional unimproved acreage for park purposes designated on the attached boundary map as locations 2 and 6. Only minimal cost for weed control, if any, is anticipated for these two locations in fiscal year 1991 -1992. The maintenance and improvement of all above mentioned parks shall include but not be limited to the following: 1. Mowing and edging of all turf areas. 1 2. Removing litter. 3. Weeding as required. 4. Irrigating as required. 5. Fertilizing of all vegetation as each species requires. 6. Pruning so as to not inhibit the natural growth characteristics of the plant. 7. Cleaning existing facilities to be clear and free of all debris. Minor repairs as needed. 8. Eradicating vector at the first indication of existence. 9. Maintaining lights, playground equipment, playcourts and public restrooms. 10. Installing park or recreational improvements, including but not limited to drains and sidewalks. Maintaining and servicing said improvements. SECTION 3 ASSESSMENT ROLL All parcels of real property affected are listed on the "Assessment Roll ", Exhibit A, which will be on file in City Hall with the City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 800 S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and which are also made a part hereof by reference. SECTION 4 ESTIMATE OF COST The estimated costs of operating the proposed District are shown in Appendix "B" of this Report. SECTION 5 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573, states that "The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." 2 The method and formula of benefit spread recognizes that every property within the City of Moorpark benefits from public parks and recreation facilities. The method of spreading maintenance costs is based upon the "people use" attributed to each land use within the City. This method was chosen because the benefit received by having park facilities is directly proportionate to the number of people generated by each land use. Recognizing that residential land uses within the City derive a higher degree of benefit than non - residential land uses, the formula was subdivided into two main groups, with residential land uses contributing in 75% of the assessment and non - residential uses being assessed for the remaining 25% of the maintenance costs. The benefits to residential land uses are clear. The residents of the City utilize the parks during their leisure hours. Benefits to non - residential property include such items as offering employees the opportunity to utilize the parks during lunch time and after hours, as well as providing an aesthetic environment which attracts potential employees into the area. The "people use" factors utilized in the assessment district spread formula are shown in Appendix "A ". The City Council approved a rebate procedure for disadvantaged citizens on November 1989. The procedure shall be followed as described in Appendix E. In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1 are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost to each lot or parcel in accordance with the benefits that are received. 3 APPENDIX APPENDIX "A" CITY OF MOORPARK Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1 Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 Table 1 Parks Maintenance Formula Use People Annual Code Description Use Assessment 0 Residential Vacant 0 $ 0.00 1 Single Family - 4.00 $ 33.20 Level 1 2 Mobile Home 0 $ 0.00 3 Condo 3.00 per $ 24.90 Per unit unit 4 Residential Income 3.00 per $ 24.90 per (2 -4 Units) unit unit 5 Apartments (5 +) 3.00 per $ 24.90 per unit unit 6 Single Family - 4.00 $ 33.20 Level 2 9 Mobile Home and 3.00 per $ 24.90 per Trailer Parks space space 10 Commercial Vacant 0 $ 0.00 11 Retail Stores, Single 3.00 per $ 167.97 per Story parcel pmel 12 Store & Office 3.00 $ 167.97 (Combination) 15 Shopping Centers 10.00 $ 559.90 (Neighborhood) Use People Annual Code Description Use Assessment 16 Shopping Centers 30.00 $1,679.70 (Regional) 17 Office Building 3.00 $ 167.97 (1 Story) 18 Office Stores 6.00 per $ 335.94 per (Multi- Story) parcel paw 19 Retail Stores 6.00 per $ 335.94 per (Multi- Story) parcel parcel 21 Restaurants & 3.00 $ 167.97 Cocktail Lounge 24 Banks, Savings & 3.00 $ 167.97 Loans 25 Service Stations 3.00 $ 167.97 26 Auto Sales, Repair 1.00 $ 55.99 30 Industrial Vacant 0 $ 0.00 Land 31 Light Manufacturing 12.00 $ 671.88 32 Warehousing 4.00 $ 223.96 33 Industrial Condos, 3.00 $ 167.97 Co -Ops, PUD's 38 Mineral Processing 3.00 $ 167.97 44 Truck Crops 2.00 $ 111.98 46 Pasture (Permanent) 2.00 $ 111.98 48 Poultry 2.00 $ 111.98 49 Flowers, Seed 2.00 $ 111.98 Production 51 Orchards 2.00 $ 111.98 53 Field Crops, Dry 2.00 $ 111.98 54 Pasture of Graze, 2.00 $ 111.98 Dry 55 Feed Lots 2.00 $ 111.98 57 Tree Farms 2.00 $ 111.98 Use People Annual Code Description Use Assessment 61 Theater 2.00 $ 111.98 69 Parks 0 $ 0.00 70 Institutional Vacant 0 $ 0.00 Land 71 Churches, Convent, 0 $ 0.00 Rectory 72 Schools 0 $ 0.00 73 Colleges 0 $ 0.00 78 Public Bldgs., 0 $ 0.00 Firehouses, Museums, Etc. 79 Flood Control 0 $ 0.00 80 Miscellaneous Vacant 0 $ 0.00 Land 81 Utility Water Company 0 $ 0.00 83 Petroleum & Gas 1.00 $ 55.99 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0 $ 0.00 88 Highways & Streets 0 $ 0.00 91 Utility Edison 0 $ 0.00 92 Telephone 0 $ 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 0 $ 0.00 94 Undedicated 0 $ 0.00 Community Condo Development 95 State Property 0 $ 0.00 96 County Property 0 $ 0.00 97 City Property 0 $ 0.00 99 Exempt 0 $ 0.00 Actual Assessment amount may vary due to discrepancies between use codes and actual property uses. APPENDIX "B" CITY OF MOORPARK Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1 Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 BUDGET ESTIMATE Fiscal Year 1992 -1993 Park Sites Maintenance and Operations Maintenance and Operation Personnel Costs Carryover Total Amount to be Funded by District (FY 1992 -1993) $ 237,006.00 130,000.00 (10,000.00) $ 357,006.00 APPENDIX "C" BOUNDARY MAP •- � w. air „�, .�,�� w r tom" • W w � NNINI • �. , nru a „uwl 1 '� }'+� r nq•q! �y'+s, a l.. q �1 119 . »a • �, ♦ �.,a lot 444 - 1 IL 00 1 1.. _.r.y._. ,.� � _ 11 • �' "w��; • $'•bx u 0 � KI • , je '1,� »N . ! ' • 1 1 r•. r. � • � ' s l 1 � 1a I I 1 N u . ♦ �l,s IWQ,1. ' yy \In11w»Iwwww» ru.xM � {�� I , �:I j' �wK'».1 • 1 Ia ir. •� ,j . �I r � n ' ..' , � I «,. y l: , . ib ,♦ypNN ' I z ,mmN 9d' ' 1 1 � ' J .aioa - � 'k. • � �� - J I} 1 r T • ••'r � 1 i. • p NIx�Nf x.•N• • ' ' - ♦ '.I 1 •,� - 1 �� .Nr. .�Mi1,,'• 411W,y?'" �4, } . ' `' 1 _ _ �ININ••� � ... NNsss4N / )w: NWWi ,RiN1,N1 • r - , r 1 � ••• Mw1a' •• ,al : ' d 6 1 .(\I,IxgN� Io INw I ar �+III;i x+11,. •�., .. .,e � i � i144• ®' I I 1 1 4 i �,�'1v rN_ wa`^ Nw [ <♦ wu N" 1. i as 1 i /110 It 1 i 1A 13 le If � • '. ' I 4 •a•' •'1jNtiuw «,yam• N .. � i%H'� O T�� ; 1 1 , V, '4._ .. •�Iwu.w.l�'� yyNw /, r , �Qrl< o I IW V Jp�Wt�,INU< /Mj/ APPENDIX "D" Appendix "D ", the Assessment Roll, shows the assessment upon each lot or parcel (approximately 7893 parcels) within this District and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and County Assessor. The Ventura County Assessor's office no longer lists public utility easements on the Assessor's Roll. rpt \028engrp.dc APPENDIX "E" RESOLUTIONS APPENDIX "F" REBATE PROCEDURE a 1 ELOISE BROWN Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tern CLINT HARPER, Ph. D. Councilmember PAUL LAWRASON Councilmember SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer Var FROM: DATE: MOORPARK M E H O R A N D U H The Honorable City Council Budget and Finance Committee November 1, 1989 SUBJECT: Procedures for Rebate of Assessments STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police Pursuant to the Council's direction in July, 1989, the Budget and Finance Committee has developed proposed procedures to implement rebates for the annual assessments for AD 84 -2 and AD 85 -1. ` The proposed procedures are as follows: 1 1. Owner occupant with rebate only on property granted a homeowner's exemption. 2. Demonstrate that there is no tax delinquincy on the property and the assessment(s) for which the rebate is requested have been paid. 3. Gross family income may not exceed two- thirds of the then current County median income; the most recent state and federal tax return must be presented to verify family income and family size. Regardless of the above, persons who feel that special hardship circumstances exist and who meet other applicable criteria may apply for a rebate. The City Council's Budget and Finance Committee shall make a determination on all such requests with a confidential report to Council on all approved requests. 4. Persons granted property tax assistance under the Gonsalves - Deukmejian - Petris Property Tax Assistance Law upon presentation of proof of such assistance and meeting items 1 and 2, above, shall be eligible for rebate. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark. California 97021 fgn5) 1 i i The Honorable City Council November 1, 1989 Page 2 5. A rebate may be requested between January 1 and May 31 of any fiscal year for assessment due and payable during that same fiscal year consistent with the above criteria. No rebate will be granted for delinquent assessments paid during any subsequent fiscal year. 6. Staff will issue press releases concerning the rebate process in January, April and July of each year. The rebate procedure will also be contained in the Engineer's Report for both Assessment Districts. 7. Rebates of City -wide assessments of both Assessment Districts will be funded by the City's General Fund. Rebates of special zone of benefit assessments will be funded by the respective zone of benefit for that District. 8910319 MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting of 198-L ACTION: _