Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES CC 1992 856 1992 0807RESOLUTION NO. 92 -856 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE REVISED MOORPARK LAND USE AND CIRCULATION ELEMENTS OF THE MOORPARK GENERAL PLAN AND RELATED MAPS (GPA 89 -1) WHEREAS, at duly noticed public hearings held on November 4, 18, and 25, 1991, December 6, and 20, 1991, the Planning Commission considered a draft Land Use and Circulation Element prepared for the City by the City's General Plan Update consultant, PBR (Phillips, Brandt and Reddick) ; and on January 6, 1992 the Commission adopted its Resolution No. 92 -253 recommending to the City Council that they approve the amendments proposed by the Commission. WHEREAS, the Land Use and Circulation Elements were circulated to over 45 agencies and interested persons; WHEREAS, the City Council held public hearings on January 22 and 29, February 1, M and 12, and March 18, 1992, and considered at meetings on February 26, March 11, April 8, 22 and 29, May 6, and on May 13, 1992, the draft Land Use and Circulation Elements of the Moorpark General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered oral and written testimony on this matter, the Final Environmental Impact Report, and the staff reports prepared for the public hearings and meetings; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92 -855 certifying the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Moorpark General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements Update and Sphere of Influence Expansion Study, and approving the Mitigation Monitoring Program, Findings, and Statement of Overriding Considerations. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Moorpark City Council hereby adopts the revised Land Use and Circulation Elements of the Moorpark General Plan as identified by Exhibits 1 and 2. SECTION 2. That the adoption of the City of Moorpark revised Land Use and Circulation Elements is based upon numerous fact.rs, including but not limited to the following: 1 The document f t i I l - l (-c)mpl i es with a l l requirements (.;f S- iIte law. 2 ) The document r epresent:, the desires of the Community. Resolution No. 92 -856 3) The document provides for the long -range development of the ultimate City in a manner that is sensitive to existing terrain, as well as serving the needs of the ultimate residents of the City. 4) The General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements establish major policy direction for the coordination of private and public development that is compatible with the existing community, while fully providing for the health, safety and general welfare of the residents. 5) The adopting of the General Plan is the culmination of extensive citizen participation over the past two and one -half years. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall transmit to the planning agency of the County of Ventura a copy of the Moorpark Land Use and Circulation Elements, pursuant to Government Cc-%^P Section 65352. SECTION 4. That the City Council finds that the adoption of the Land Use and Circulation Elements identified in Exhibits 1 and 2 are not substantially modified from the drafts considered by the Planning Commission; SECTION 5. That this resolution shall take effect immediately; SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 13th day of May, 1992. Paul W. wrason, J Mayor ATTEST: i1 MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529.6864 CITY OF MOORPARK GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT EXHIBIT 1 TO RESOLUTION 92 -856 Adopted by the City Council on May 13, 1992 AWR4,SON .IIi r+N t WOZN.AK SCOT t MON 1G( 11Af HY ;1E RNA- V PA ;'I Nf ! f10Y E TAI I EY jR Mayo, 'A'AY." P", le", .0 n.duu•m[�r 'ImCmbnr �;aunedmemb? r ,n;tN/ L", HeC Vt:'ea Plam" City Council Mayor Paul W. Lawrason, Jr. Mayor Pro Tea John E. Wozniak Councilmember Scott Montgomery Councilmember Bernardo Perez Councilmembe.r Roy Talley, Jr. Former Councilmember Eloise Brown Former Councilmember Clinton Harper Planning Commission Chairman Michael Wesner, Jr. Vice Chair-man John Torres Commissioner Barton ?filler Commissioner Steve Brodsky Commissioner Christina May Former Commissioner Glen Schmidt Former Commissioner Bill Lanahan Former Commissioner Michael Scullin City Staff Steven Kueny, City Manager Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development Deborah Traffenstedt, Senior Planner Kathleen Mallory Phipps, Dissociate Planner Craig Malin, Assistant Planner TAHLS OF CONTENTS i Page NC). 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Statutory Requirements 1 1.2 Overview 1 2.0 OVERVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 2.1 Existing Land Use (City Area) 3 2.2 Existing Land Use (Unincorporated Area) 5 3.0 COMMUNITY ISSUES 7 4.0 LAND USE GOALS AND POLICIES 10 5.0 LAND USE PLAN ASSUMPTIONS /DESIGNATIONS 23 5.1 Land Use Classifications 23 5.2 Specific Plan Designation 27 6.0 LAND USE PLAN STATISTICAL SUMMARY 38 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION 41 APPENDIX A - SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 47 i LIST OF EXHIBITS Follows Exhibit No. Title RM NC). 1 Valley Floor and Developed Areas of City 2 Downtown and Town Center 3 Land Use Plan (City Area) 4 Planning Area Land Use Plan (Unincorporated Area)* 5 Visual Horizon Lines 6 General Plan /Zoning Compatibility Matrix * All exhibits are located in the back of this document ii LIST OF TABLES Table No. Time 1 City of Moorpark Land Use Inventory 2 Residential Land Use Designations 3 Land Use Plan - Statistical Summary iii Bw M. 3 23 39 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 STATUTORY REQUIREM MS State of California Planning and Zoning Law requires that a land use element be prepared as part of a general plan as follows: Government Code Section 65302(a): A land use element which designates the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of the land for housing, business, industry, open space, including agriculture, natural resources, recreation, and enjoyment of scenic beauty, education, public buildings and grounds, solid and liquid waste disposal facilities, and other categories of public and private uses of land. The land use element shall include a statement of the standards of population density and building intensity recommended for the various districts and other territory covered by the plan. The land use element shall also identify areas covered by the plan which are subject to flooding and shall be reviewed annually with respect to such areas. Effectively, the land use element has the broadest scope of the elements required by the state. Since it regulates how land is to be utilized, it integrates and synthesizes most of the issues and policies contained in all other plan elements. Throughout the General Plan Update process, the City of Moorpark held a series of regularly scheduled public workshops to provide public input in identifying the specific issues and goals of the community for the City's overall planning area which includes the area within existing City limits and the area of unincorporated land immediately surrounding the City. Land use designations for the overall planning area are identified on the two Land Use Plan maps included in the back of this document. Exhibit 3 indicates land use designations within existing City limits and Exhibit 4 indicates land use designations for the unincorporated areas immediately surrounding the City. 1.2 OVERVIEW The Moorpark community was notable originally for its agriculture and historical character. However, as a function of regional growth trends, low land costs, and Moorpark's proximity to employment centers in the Los Angeles area, recent development pressure has resulted in the urbanization of much of the City's large open space area and agricultural lands. While under urbanizing pressure, the City has maintained a low- profile suburban rural character by continuing a pattern of low density, single family housing in a setting of surrounding rolling hillsides. The majority of the City's development has occurred in the low - lying valley floor areas generally surrounding the Arroyo Simi. Exhibit 1 shows the valley f loor as well as already developed areas of the City. Moorpark's town center is concentrated along Moorpark Avenue, north of High Street and consists of community uses such as City office buildings, the civic center, the library, park areas, etc. Along High Street, Moorpark's older downtown area is comprised of a variety of commercial- serving uses characterized by a conglomerate of styles, character, and images that are historically based. The specific location of Moorpark's town center and downtown area are shown in Exhibit 2. Most of the hillside areas surrounding the urbanized areas of the City and in the unincorporated planning area, remain primarily in agricultural and open space use. Generally, Moorpark is characterized as a bedroom community with the majority of Moorpark residents employed outside of Ventura County. 2.0 OVERVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 EXISTING LAND USE (CITY AREA) An Existing Conditions report was prepared for the City of Moorpark in May 1990 in order to identify land use trends, potential land use incompatibilities and conflicts, community planning opportunities, and to serve as a basis for projecting future growth and change within the City. The report indicates that for January 1990, there were approximately 7,797 residential dwelling units with a total City population of 26,054.1 A comprehensive survey of City land uses was completed in November 1989 and updated in May 1992 and is summarized in Table 1. Table 1 CITY OF MOORPARK LAND USE INVENTORY Updated May 1, 1992 Approximate Percent of Land Uses Acres Total Acres Low Density Residential 2,066 26.1 High Density Residential 144 1.8 Commercial 58 .7 Office 12 .2 Industrial 366 4.6 Public /Quasi Public 306 3.9 Park* 52 .7 Agriculture 50 .6 Vacant 4,533 57.3 Right -of -Way 329 4.1 TOTAL 7,916 100.0 * (The acreage listed under the Park category on Table 1 : does not include a 69 -acre parcel, owned by the City, which is planned for development as Arroyo Vista Park. That 69 -acre property is included under the vacant category in Table 1). Residential uses comprise the major urbanized land use within the City (23 percent). Moorpark has been in the midst of a major home construction boom since the late 1970s which accelerated after the City's incorporation in 1983. From 1985 to 1990, Moorpark has been one of the fastest growing cities in Ventura County, with a 61 percent population growth rate. This rate exceeds that of 1 State Department of Finance, 1990 Population and Housing estimates. surrounding cities, including Ventura, Thousand Oaks and Simi Valley. However, Moorpark's growth rate is expected to be reduced considerably in the 1990s due to the implementation of the City's Measure F growth control ordinance, adopted in 1986. This ordinance limits residential development to 270 units per year between the years 1989 -1994. Commercial, office and industrial uses combined, on the other hand, comprise less than sit percent of City land uses. Demand is limited for these uses due to locational factors such as the lack of a major commercial corridor in the City, lack of freeway frontage /access and the need for regional accessibility. Agricultural lands occupy less than one percent of the City's land use and consist mostly of row crops and orchards. These lands are surrounded by developed areas and are predominantly planned for urban uses. Approximately 142.5 acres within the City are neighborhood and community park lands. Forty -five of these dedicated acres are improved recreation areas. Some school facilities also serve community recreation needs. Existing and proposed regional facilities in the surrounding area contribute to community recreation opportunities and include Happy Camp Park, and Oak Park. The majority of land within the City falls in the vacant category (62 %); however, much of this acreage has been approved for development or is currently under construction. Pressure to urbanize the remaining undeveloped areas is likely to continue, underscoring the need for cohesive city policies and logical planning principles to direct future growth. A redevelopment plan has also been adopted for the City which identifies a redevelopment project area that includes approximately 16 percent of the total City area. The primary objectives of this plan are to prevent the spread of urban blight, increase sales tax revenues, create employment opportunities, improve infrastructure and provide greater levels of social and economic viability. Moorpark's central business district is included within the City's redevelopment project area. Recent urbanization, has degraded much of the central business district's historical sense of place and concentration of uses. However, City studies have indicated the opportunity to restore and enhance the utility of this area through revitalization of existing open space and historical buildings. 4 Many public services in the City are provided by Ventura County agencies, i.e., water, wastewater, library, and fire. Solid waste collection service is provided by a private contractor. Generally, the current level of service provided for water, wastewater and solid waste collection is considered adequate for the existing community. 2.2 EXISTING LAND USE (UNINCORPORATED Outside of the City limits, within the City's overall Area of Interest, land uses are primarily rural in nature and include agriculture, grazing, mineral extraction, regional park uses, and some residential estate lots. A description of the existing land uses for the unincorporated lands surrounding the City is provided below: Happy Camp Regional Park is located immediately north of the City limits. Approximately 290 acres of this facility are located within the City's unincorporated planning area. North of the City limits and west of Happy Camp Regional Park the terrain is primarily rolling hillsides occupied by citrus and avocado groves with some livestock grazing uses and large residential lots. A sand and gravel quarry operation is also located in the northern- most reaches of the study area boundary. To the west of the City limits and north of Los Angeles Avenue, the terrain varies from level areas of the valley floor to rolling hillsides. These areas are primarily occupied by agricultural and livestock grazing land uses. South of Los Angeles Avenue, the terrain includes flatlands (on the valley floor adjacent to the Arroyo Simi), and gently sloping hillside areas. Most of the area is occupied by agricultural row crop uses. Adjacent and southwest of the City limits are the residential uses within Moorpark Home Acres, which are not included as a part of the City's overall planning area. Immediately south of the City limits, rolling hillsides form a backdrop to the community. Some residential estates exist in this area, but are generally not visible from the Moorpark community. The Tierra Rejada Greenbelt, an area preserved for agricultural and open space uses, is located south and southeast of the City limits. East of the City limits and north of Tierra Rejada Road, the terrain varies from dominant hillsides and steeply sloping topography, to flatter areas adjacent to portions of the Arroyo Simi. A number of oak tree stands exist in the drainage courses of the hillside areas. The hillsides of this area represent a visually prominent landform, visible from various points within the community. 5 North of the City and east of Happy Camp Regional Park, the terrain is characterized by prominent hillsides, steeply sloping areas and some oak tree stands. Current uses include scattered agriculture and some livestock grazing uses. The future development of lands surrounding the City boundary require that adequate public services and infrastructure be extended to these areas in conjunction with or prior to approval of any development proposals. 3.0 COMMUNITY ISSUES "Issues" are defined as important community matters or problems that have been identified in the General Plan Update process and are addressed within the goals, policies and implementation measures of this document. Land Use ?Six Moorpark is characterized as primarily a bedrooms community with a large number of commuter residents. Achieving a more balanced Moorpark community growth pattern relies on land use diversity which includes greater amounts of industrial, office and commercial uses. Intermixing of land uses has resulted in soma compatibility issues primarily related to residential uses located adjacent to industrial, agricultural and public facility uses in the community. Related issues include: Limited commercial and office demand due to Moorpark' s location away from major urban centers, and lack of major commercial corridor and freeway frontage. Increasing the community employment base and thereby increasing the community jobs /housing ratio. Maintaining the community's suburban rural character as growth occurs. Entryways to the community and its commercial areas are congested and disoriented. Existing residential uses adjacent to industrial uses. Redevelopment Recently, the community's primary focus of the 1,217 acre redevelopment project area has been Moorpark's older central business district. The City seeks to recapture and promote the downtown's small town character while maintaining its existing historical elements. Specific issues include: Attracting new businesses and customers to downtown Moorpark. Rehabilitation /protection of existing residential neighborhood and historical elements in the downtown. Undergrounding of public utility lines. 7 Natural Features As development continues in the outlying areas of the community, more of the natural resources are endangered by pressure to urbanize. These resources include agricultural lands, visually prominent horizon lines and hillside areas, oak tree groves, floodways, drainages and rock quarry uses. Specific issues include: Appropriate development standards for steeply sloping hillsides and visually prominent horizon lines. Developing a stricter ordinance which p3Zovides more protection for mature trees as well as sensitive species of trees. Identifying appropriate uses and improvement areas for the Arroyo Simi Floodway. Open space maintenance, improvements and liability costs. Public Services Generally, public service issues involve maintaining adequate levels of service in the community as growth occurs. Continued development will create significant demands for both new infrastructure and improvements to existing service systems. Specific issues involve: Ensuring public service/ infrastructure improvements such as water and sewer line extensions, wastewater treatment plant capacity, utility and flood control improvements; increasing solid waste. School, police, fire, library, and traffic control services to support new individual projects and projected community growth. Minimizing public service /infrastructure costs due to fragmented and over- extended development patterns. Coordinating the development of public service master plans with the updated Moorpark Land Use Plan. Regional Plans Regional planning issues are addressed in the County of Ventura's various regional planning programs such as the Air Quality Management Plan, the 208 Areawide Water Management Plan and the Subregional Transportation Plan. These planning programs have been developed and updated in coordination with the Countywide Planning : Program (CPP), an advisory committee comprised of approximately 70 members including representatives of county and city planning staff, environmental interest groups, building interests, utilities agencies, and numerous other interest groups. Specific issues involve: Monitoring community growth rates to maintain consistency with county adopted population forecasts for Moorpark's growth and non - growth areas. Maintaining consistency with components of Countywide Planning Program including the Air Quality Management Plan, the 208 Areawide Water Management Plan and the Subregional Transportation Plan. Coordinating future updates and revisions of the Countywide Planning Program components with the Moorpark Land Use Plan. w7 4.0 LAND USE GOALS AflD POLICIES The goals and policies of the General Plan function as a hierarchy and provide the basis for decision making regarding the City's long -term physical development. The distinction between goals and policies and the purpose of each within the City of Moorpark General Plan is discussed below. Goals A goal is a statement of a value or quality desired by the community and is abstract by nature. Goals express an ideal future state or condition desired within the community and set the direction of future development. Goals are generally not quantifiable, time - dependent or suggestive of specific actions for achievement. Policies A policy is an action- oriented statement designed to achieve a specific state. A policy is a clear and unambiguous statement that guides day -to -day decision making regarding future development. Policies are effectuated by implementation measures or programs which are included in Section 7.0 of this document. The following Goals and Policies have been formulated in order to respond to several criteria, including: Community issues: important community matters that have been identified in the General Plan Update process. QpDortunities and constraints: identification of community planning policy opportunities and constraints serving as a basis for projecting future growth and change within the City. Relevant Plans /data collection: research and review of pertinent data and related community plans and documentation, i.e., existing General Plan, Downtown Study, Redevelopment Plan, Regional Plans. With the above criteria serving as the framework for establishing planning policy, the Land Use Element Goals and Policies focus on the following primary concerns: Balanced community growth patterns Land use compatibility Maintaining suburban rural community character Revitalization of the downtown area 10 Preservation of important natural features, agricultural areas, and visually pzxMinent hillside areas Overall intensity and density of residential land uses decreases as distance franc arterials and commercial shopping areas increases GROWTH AND POPULATION Goal 1: Attain a balanced City growth pattern which includes a full afx of land uses. Policy 1.1: New development and redevelopment shall be orderly with respect to location, timing, and density/ intensity; consistent with the provision of local public services and facilities; and compatible with the overall suburban rural community character. Policy 1.2: Every five years the City's land use inventory shall be reviewed and, if necessary, the land use element shall be codified to ensure that general plan policies are being adhered to and to provide an adequate up- to-date data base for continuing development considerations. Policy 1.3: New residential development shall be consistent with City - adopted growth ordinance policies. Policy 1.4: New development and redevelopment shall be coordinated so that the existing and planned capacity of public facilities and services shall not be adversely impacted. Policy 1.5: A comprehensive planning approach for undeveloped areas of the cocmunity shall be followed, to prevent disjointed, incremental expansion of development. GOAL 2: Establish a logical Sphere of Influence. Policy 2.1: The City shall strive to obtain and maintain sphere of influence boundaries consistent with the planned urban area on the adopted Land Use Plan. 11 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL 3: Provide a variety of housing types and opportunities for all economic segments of the community. Policy 3.1: A mix of residential densities shall be provided which accommodates the housing needs of all members of the community. Policy 3.2: Residential projects shall include variation of residential product types, lot sizes, and designs, unless determined by the City to be infeasible due to the size of the project. Policy 3.3: Where feasible, inclusionary zoning shall be used to require that a percentage of new, private residential development be affordable to very low to moderate income households. Policy 3.4: If feasible, a housing trust fund ordinance shall be adopted to require developers of non - residential projects to provide housing or contribute an in- lieu fee that goes into an affordable housing trust fund. GQAL 4: Promote upgrading and maintenance of existing housing. Policy 4.1: The residential character of identifiable neighborhoods shall be maintained by requiring adjacent new development to have compatible architectural design, landscape, streetscape, color and materials, building setbacks, and building heights. Policy 4.2: Existing neighborhoods shall be protected and preserved in order to maintain their character and identity. Policy 4.3: The City shall avoid displacement of conforming residential uses. GQAL 5: Develop new residential housing which is compatible with the character of existing individual neighborhoods and minimizes land use incompatibility. 12 Policy 5.1: Multiple - family dwellings shall be developed in close proximity to employment opportunities, shopping areas, public parks, and transit lines, with careful consideration of the proximity to and compatibility with single - family neighborhoods. Policy 5.2: Infill development in existing residential neighborhoods shall be compatible with the scale and character of the surrounding neighborhood. Policy 5.3: Landscaped and /or natural vegetation buffer areas shall be provided around and within residential projects to minimize land use conflicts and privacy impacts. Policy 5.4: Clustering of residential dwelling units may be allowed, if it can be shown that the common area created by the clustering is designed to protect a public interest or provide a public benefit such as the following: protects environmentally sensitive habitat or agricultural land; promotes land conservation as well as visual relief; provides a substantial recreational opportunity or an affordable housing benefit. SPECIFIC PLAN ARRAS GOAL 6: Encourage the use of Specific Plans in the undeveloped areas of the co minity. Policy 6.1: Specific Plans shall be utilized as a tool for implementation of General Plan policies and priorities for larger land areas. The intent of each Specific Plan is to achieve a long -term cohesive development program which is responsive to the physical and economic opportunities and constraints of each individual Specific Plan area. Policy 6.2: The ultimate land uses, design guidelines, development standards, infrastructure and phasing requirements adopted for any given Specific Plan shall be consistent with the General Plan text discussion (see Section 5.2) of the type, location and intensity of use determined appropriate for each Specific Plan area. 13 Policy 6.3: Where the City finds it appropriate to consider development permit requests for individual parcels within "multiple ownership" Specific Plan areas prior to the adoption of a Specific Plan, the permit request shall be based upon the General Plan overlay designation as shown on the land use plan. The overlay designation is intended to reflect a level of intensity and types of uses that are appropriate to occur in the absence of an overall Specific Plan. Said individual requests shall be consistent with the General Plan text (see Section 5.1) discussion of the type, location and intensity of use determined appropriate for the General Plan overlay designation assigned to each multiple ownership Specific Plan area. Properties within the City's sphere of influence, that are proposed to be annexed into the City limits, shall not be exempted from a Specific Plan requirement. Policy 6.4: Development intensity and density should decrease as distance from arterials and commercial shopping areas increases. Policy 6.5: The land use plan shall include adequate land for public recreational, cultural, educational, institutional (governmental, police, fire, etc.), religious and other service uses for the community. COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL 7: Provide for a variety of commercial facilities which serve community residents and meet regional needs. Policy 7.1: Commercial development should be clustered in compact areas, rather than extended along streets and highways (i.e., strip commercial development). Policy 7.2: Commercial uses should be located along major roadways in order to consolidate centers and provide pedestrian links to adjacent residential areas. Policy 7.3: External cross - connections between commercial uses shall be provided so as to reduce the number of curb cuts and number of vehicle trips on adjacent roadways. Policy 7.4: The City shall encourage adjacent commercial developments to coordinate design with regard to access, parking, and architectural features. 14 GQAL 8: Provide for new commercial development which is ccmpatible with surrounding land uses. Policy 8.1: New commercial uses shall be compatible in scale and character with all adjacent commercial uses. Policy 8.2: Commercial development shall incorporate design features such as walls, landscaping and setbacks, and include height and lighting restrictions so as to minimize adverse impacts on adjacent uses and enhance the visual characteristics of the area. Policy 8.3: Automobile and truck access to commercial properties shall be located so as to minimize impacts to adjacent uses. Policy 8.4: Commercial uses shall be well maintained to enhance the visual characteristics of the area. GOAL 9: Promote the revitalisation of the downtown commercial core (Moorpark Avenue area, Walnut Street, Hard Street, Magnolia Avenue, and Sigh Street). Policy 9.1: The visual character of the downtown commercial core shall be strengthened in order to attract a variety of commercial uses and to promote the economic viability of downtown Moorpark. Policy 9.2: The low -rise scale of the downtown commercial core should be maintained. Policy 9.3: The establishment of a community meeting/ marketplace in the downtown core shall be promoted. Policy 9.4: A comprehensive plan for the downtown commercial core, shall promote new commercial infill areas, park or recreational opportunities, public parking, and a potential multimodal transportation center. Policy 9.5: The civic center shall remain in the downtown area to encourage the revitalization of downtown. Policy 9.6: Public spaces and services shall be maintained to create an aesthetically and functionally welcoming environment. Policy 9.7: An integrated architectural theme should be used in the redevelopment of existing or development of new commercial buildings. 15 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT GM 10: Encourage a diversity of industrial uses which are located and designed in a ccmpatible manner with snrroundinq land uses. Policy 10.1: New industrial development should be located adjacent to existing industrial uses and along major transportation corridors. Policy 10.2: Industrial uses shall incorporate design features, such as screen walls, landscaping and setbacks, and Include height and lighting restrictions, so as to minimize adverse impacts on adjacent uses and enhance the visual characteristics of the area. Policy 10.3: Industrial uses shall be well maintained to enhance the visual characteristics of the area. Policy 10.4: Industries which are considered to have limited emissions and which meet local, regional, and state air and water pollution control goals and standards should be encouraged to locate within the City. Policy 10.5: The City shall encourage the establishment of a recycling market development zone (i.e., enterprise zone) for recycling businesses. AGRICULTURE GOAL 11: Identify and encourage the preservation of viable agricultural resources in the City and its Area of Interest. Policy 11.1: An agricultural land use designation should be retained for farmlands within the City's Area of Interest, which have been identified as Prime and /or Statewide Importance, as long as economically viable. Policy 11.2: When new residential development is adjacent to existing agricultural uses, a 200 -foot minimum width setback shall be provided to minimize compatibility conflicts. Policy 11.3: Agricultural uses in buffer areas between Moorpark and adjacent communities shall be encouraged, and the City shall support the use of Greenbelt Agreements to preserve agricultural land uses. 16 PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES GQiL 12s Basure that a full range of public facilities and services are provided to meet the needs of the ccEmunity. Policy 12.1: Development shall be permitted only when adequate public facilities and services are available or will be provided when needed. Policy 12.2: Efficient and equitable delivery of urban services shall be ensured by the development of capital improvement plans for urban services which 1) identify existing and future (general plan buildout) needs; 2) establish a phasing plan for providing new urban services commensurate with needs generated by existing and future development; 3) assure that financing is available to provide adequate necessary facilities and services prior to approval of any project which would exceed the capacity or significantly reduce the quality of existing services. Policy 12.3: The City shall cooperate with the County of Ventura and other appropriate agencies in the siting of any future landfill or other non - hazardous, waste processing facility. Policy 12.4: New residential development shall include adequate public and private open space and recreational uses to serve residential neighborhoods. Policy 12.5: The City's current standard of five acres of parkland per 1,000 persons, or such higher maximum standard allowed by State law, shall be maintained consistent with the City's Open Space and Recreation Element to ensure that adequate passive/ active parkland is provided in conjunction with future infill, redevelopment, and new development projects. Policy 12.6: Developers of new commercial and industrial buildings or expansion projects shall be required to pay the established fee for City park and recreation facilities and services. Policy 12.7: Where feasible, shared use programs between public and private service and facility providers shall be encouraged. 17 Policy 12.8: Any proposed project shall be required to contribute its fair share of the cost of providing adequate public services and facilities. Policy 12.9: Where determined feasible, future development shall include infrastructure improvements to allow use of tertiary treated water. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND EMPLOYMENT GOAL 13: Achieve a well - balanced and diversified economy within the City which provides a variety of economic and employment opportunities. Policy 13.1: A balanced job /housing ratio should be encouraged. Policy 13.2: New commercial and industrial uses which will generate long -term employment opportunities and diversify the community's employment_ base shall be encouraged. Policy 13.3: The City shall encourage the coordinated revitalization of obsolete or declining commercial areas, particularly focusing on the downtown area. Policy 13.4: The City shall work with the business community in a cooperative manner to encourage desired businesses to locate and to remain in the City. Policy 13.5: The City shall work with the business and development community to encourage an increase in sales tax capture. Policy 13.6: The City shall establish and implement a business attraction, promotion, and retention plan. PRESERVATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY GOAL 14: Establish land uses and development intensities which are compatible with scenic and natural resources and which encourage environmental preservation. Policy 14.1: New development shall be located and designed to minimize adverse visual and /or environmental impacts to the community. Policy 14.2: New development shall respect, integrate with, and complement the natural features of the land. V. Policy 14.3: New development shall not contribute to or cause hazardous conditions of any kind. Policy 14.4: The flood control easement area adjacent to the Arroyo Simi floodway shall be preserved and enhanced as an important natural and scenic feature of the community. Policy 14.5: Compatible open space /recreational uses of the Arroyo Simi floodway should be encouraged which are consistent with the provisions of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for floodway uses. Policy 14.6: Areas identified as significant aquifer recharge areas shall be protected and preserved. GOAL 15: Maintain a high quality environment that contributes to and enhances the quality of life and protects public health, safety and welfare. Policy 15.1: Public & private projects shall be designed so that significant vegetation shall be maintained and protected, including riparian and oak woodland vegetation and mature trees (as defined in the City Code). Policy 15.2: Ecologically sensitive habitats shall be protected and preserved or replaced with no net loss of habitat so long as there is substantial public benefit to any relocation program. Policy 15.3: Natural and cultural resources having significant educational, scientific, scenic, recreational or social value shall be protected and preserved. Policy 15.4: Development which will not result in a negative impact on air quality shall be encouraged in order to maintain and enhance air quality for the health and well -being of City residents. Policy 15.5: The City shall require developers to maintain wildlife corridors to allow for the passage of animals between designated open space or recreation areas. Policy 15.6: Commercial, industrial and manufacturing uses shall be required to implement reuse, reduction, and recycling programs consistent with the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element. 19 Policy 15.7: Efficient /effective siting, operation and maintenance of sanitation facilities shall be encouraged to minimize offensive odors and discharges from the sanitation plant. Policy 15.8: Development in significant hazard areas, which cannot be mitigated without resulting in significant adverse environmental impacts, shall be prohibited. Policy 15.9: New development projects shall be required to use xeriscape landscaping techniques which include drought- tolerant plant species, reduction of turf area, irrigation designed to meet plant needs, and grouping plants according to their watering needs. Policy 15.10: The City shall encourage the introduction of water conservation fixtures, which exceed Building Code requirements, into new development projects. COMMUNITY APPEARANCE GOAL 16: Enhance and aaintain the suburban /rural identity of the comity . Policy 16.1: For each existing neighborhood the overall theme(s) and character shall be maintained or enhanced. Redevelopment and /or infill projects shall be consistent with the theme and character of the area. Policy 16.2: Hillside development standards shall be adopted which restrict grading on slopes greater than 20 percent and which encourage the preservation of visual horizon lines and significant hillsides as prominent visual features. (Conceptual Horizon Lines are shown on Exhibit 5, located at the back of this document.) Policy 16.3: The overall density and intensity of development should decrease as the slope increases. Policy 16.4: New residential development should complement the overall community character of the City, establish a sense of place, and ensure compatibility with important existing local community identities. O GOAL 17: Enhance the physical and visual image of the casmunity. . Policy 17.1: New development shall be compatible with the scale and visual character of the surrounding Policy 17.6: neighborhood. Policy 17.2: Identifiable entryways for the overall community, and unique or principal business /commercial districts of the City (i.e., City core and transportation corridors) should be encouraged. Policy 17.3: Design standards should be established for City entryways on the south (SR -23 and Tierra Rejada Policy 17.7: Road), east (SR -118 freeway at Los Angeles Avenue, and New Los Angeles Avenue), north (Walnut Canyon Road and future SR -23 extension), and west (Los Policy 17.8: Angeles Avenue), which encourage landscape setbacks, sign monumentation and other special design treatments to enhance gateways to the City. Policy 17.4: Design concepts should be established for the overall community and for special treatment areas, such as the downtown district, which may include guidelines for architecture, landscape architecture, signage, streetscape, and infrastructure. Policy 17.5: New development should incorporate a variety of landscape architecture themes and techniques to help organize and delineate land uses and to enhance the overall visual quality of the City. Policy 17.6: Enhanced landscaping shall be used around residential, commercial and industrial buildings and parking areas as well as along easements of flood control channels, roadways, railroad right of ways, and other public and private areas, to soften the urban environment and enhance views from roadways and surrounding uses. Policy 17.7: Design features which provide visual relief and separation shall be required between land uses of conflicting character. Policy 17.8: Undergrounding of utilities shall be required in conjunction with development projects whenever feasible. 21 Policy 17.9: Visual impacts of above -grade utility structures, such as water storage tanks, water check valves, electric and telephone boxes, etc., shall be minimized through use of landscaping, materials, and colors that blend with the environment. Policy 17.10: A design program which includes specific standards and detailed design measures shall be established for the downtown area. Policy 17.11: The City shall cooperate with the County of Ventura Cultural Heritage Board to identify and inventory, and preserve Moorpark's historical resources. Policy 17.12: The City shall encourage the provision of art in public places and encourage developers to include works of art or artistic elements as a part of commercial and industrial development projects. COAL 18: Provide for and promote the revitalization of visually degraded landscaping, building facades and deteriorated buildings in the community. Policy 18.1: All downtown area revitalization efforts shall preserve, as appropriate, a historic theme reflective of the community's origins. Policy 18.2: The established redevelopment authority shall be used to help provide for the revitalization of the downtown area. Policy 18.3: The creation of both residential and commercial historic districts, and the upgrading of historic structures should be encouraged. Policy 18.4: Development in the downtown area should incorporate the careful use of compatible or similar construction materials and architectural style, so as not to detract from the integrity of historical features. Policy 18.5: Creative programs for resolving the parking problems of commercial uses on High Street and Moorpark Avenue shall be encouraged. 22 5.0 LAND USE PLAN ASSUMPTIONS /DESIGNATIONS 5.1 LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS In accordance with the State General Plan Guidelines, the Land Use Element designates the amount, location, distribution density, and intensity of each land use proposed. The following section describes the intent of each of the land use categories identified for the City's entire planning area and shown on Exhibits 3 and 4. Residential Density For each of the residential land use classifications listed in Table 2, the maximum density for new development shall be the density shown in Column A. The City Council may approve a density bonus over the otherwise maximum residential density, consistent with the State Density Bonus Law (Section 65915 et sec. of the California Goverment Code) and any density bonus provisions contained in the City Municipal Code. No density bonus increase shall exceed the Density Limit shown in Column B of Table 2. Table 2 RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Residential Designation A. Maximum Density* B. Density Limit ** RL Rural Low 1.0 DU /5 Acres 1.25 DU /5 Acres RH Rural High 1.0 DU /Acre 1.25 DU /Acre L Low 1.0 DU /Acre 2.0 DU /Acre ML Medium Low 2.0 DU /Acre 3.0 DU /Acre M Medium 4.0 DU /Acre 5.0 DU /Acre H High 7.0 DU /Acre 10.0 DU /Acre VH Very High 15.0 DU /Acre 20 DU /Acre * Maximum development density unless a density bonus is approved consistent with State Density Bonus Law and City Municipal Code. ** No density bonus shall result in a density level which exceeds the Density Limit established in Table 2. LAND USE CATEGORIES RL - Rural Low Residential (1 dwelling unit per 5 -acre maximum) This designation is intended to allow limited development of residential estate lots on minimum five -acre lots or using clustering techniques for areas characterized by significant site constraints, (rugged topography, steep slopes, lack of services, limited access, etc.), or areas of important visual and natural resources. -13 al High Residential (1 dwelling unit per 1 -acre maximum) This designation is intended for residential development in areas containing some development constraint features such as, rugged topography, significant natural or visual resources, limited access, etc. Residential uses are characterized by rural large estate lots or clustered single family homes, with significant permanent open space area, consistent with the constraints of the land. L - Low Density Residential (1.0 dwelling unit per acre maximum) This designation is intended for residential development characterized by either single family homes on half acre lots or larger, or by clustered single family homes which are sensitive to the natural terrain and minimize grading requirements. ML - Medium Low Density Residential (2.0 dwelling units per acre maximum) This designation is intended for single family residential development either in standard subdivision form or using clustering techniques to minimize grading and to conserve slopes of twenty percent or greater. M - Medium Density Residential (4.0 dwelling units per acre maximum) This designation is intended for residential development characterized by single family homes in standard subdivision form or innovative designs which utilize clustering, zero lot line, or planned development features. This designation covers a significant portion of the residential acreage in the City and usually occupies areas of generally level topography. H - High Density Residential (7.0 dwelling units per acre maximum) This designation is intended for a wide range of residential development types including attached and detached single family units and multiple family attached units. Areas with this designation should exhibit adequate and convenient access to local collector streets and be conveniently serviced by neighborhood commercial and recreational facilities. 24 VH - Very High Density Residential (15.0 dwelling units per acre maximum) This designation is intended for residential development characterized by multiple family attached units and apartment and condominium buildings. It is intended that this category utilize innovative site planning, provide onsite recreational amenities and be located in close proximity to major community facilities, business centers and major arterials. SP - Specific Plan This designation allows for the preparation of a specific plan as described in detail in Section 5.2 and Appendix A. C -1 - Neighborhood Coon=ial (.25 FAR)' This designation includes neighborhood shopping centers (approximately 1 -5 acres) which provide a limited range of retail goods and services required by residents in the immediate vicinity. It encourages consolidated shopping opportunities including, personal services, convenience stores, eating and drinking establishments, gas stations, banks and other neighborhood serving uses. C -2 - General r^mwwcial ( .25 FAR) This designation provides for co=ercial areas with a wide range of retail and service activities (6 -20 acres). Intended uses include community shopping centers, department stores, restaurants, automotive uses, office and professional services, and business support services. This designation encourages the grouping of commercial outlets into consolidated centers with direct access to major roads, arterials and /or freeways. I -1 - Licht Industrial (.38 FAR) This designation is intended to provide for a variety of industrial uses within the City. Suitable uses include light industrial service, technical research and business office use in a business park context. The M -1, limited industrial, zone as identified in the" City's Zoning Ordinance, is consistent with the I -1 designation. 2 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is the mamumum percentage of buildable area defined by the ratio of gross floor area (not including parking strtrtures) within a structure to the total project site. 99 I -2 - Medium Industrial (.38 FAR) This designation is intended to provide for intensive industrial uses including light manufacturing, processing, fabrication and other non - hazardous industrial uses. The X -2, Medium Industrial, Zone, as identified in the City•s Zoning Ordinance, is consistent with the I -2 designation. AQ = A=culture 1 (1 dwelling unit per 10 -40 acre minimum) This designation applies to viable agriculture uses located near urban growth areas of the City. 2 - cul 2 (1 dwelling unit per 40 -acre minimum) This designation is intended for large parcels of agricultural use located in rural areas, with appropriate buffers in proximity to adjacent urban areas. OS -1 - Open Space 1 (1 dwelling unit per 10 -40 acre minimum) This designation identifies those open space lands which contain various development constraints such as slope gradient, soil and geotechnical hazards, plus othe environmental concerns, access, and availability of public services. A mineral resource production overlay designation is provided for significant mineral resource deposits as identified by the California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology. OS -2 - QUen Space 2 (1 dwelling unit per 40 -acre minimum) This designation identifies permanent open space areas which function to preserve visual resources and natural areas, buffer communities and provide relief from noise and crowding of urban development, maintain environmentally hazardous areas, etc. P - Park This designation identifies neighborhood, community and regional park facilities in the community. Implementation of the City,s park development standards provide for balanced recreational facilities throughout the community. S - Schools Public school sites of all levels, elementary through high school, as well as the Moorpark College facility are all identified by this classification. U - Utility This designation identifies major :ublic utility facilities. 26 PUB - Public /Institutional This designation identifies public facilities, including: government buildings, libraries, fire stations, non - profit organization buildings, and community service centers but excludes jail facilities. PTZWT - F1oodWaY This designation identifies the floodway of the Arroyo Simi as identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Habitable structures are prohibited. FRWY -R/W - Freeway Right -of -Way This designation identifies the existing right -of -way and portions of future right -of -way for the SR -118 and SR -23 freeways. 5.2 SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATION - SP The specific plan designation has been provided in the Land Use Element to address large -scale projects in the City and proposed sphere of influence study area. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 65450- 65457, specific plans are intended as a tool for the systematic implementation of the general plan and shall include text and diagrams indicating: The distribution, location and extent of land uses and the circulation system proposed within the specific plan area The proposed distribution, location, extent and intensity of major transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy and other essential support facilities within the specific plan area Developed standards and regulations, and standards and criteria for the preservation of natural resources An implementation program ensuring the fulfillment of the items above Appendix A, located in the back of this Land Use Element, contains further requirements for specific plan contents and identifies the evaluation criteria the City Council will consider in determining whether a plan is appropriate for the area concerned. These criteria include natural features and topographic constraints, cultural constraints, environmental effects, land use considerations, etc. A major goal for the specific planning process is to ensure that development occurs in an orderly fashion, with due regard to environmental factors. All Land Use Element 27 goals and policies shall be applicable to designated specific plan areas. The actual acreage and locations of development which occur within each specific plan will be based on the evaluation criteria the City Council will consider in determining whether a plan is appropriate for the area concerned. Based upon the City's implementation of the Land Use Element Goals and Policies, specific plan areas containing significant constraints may result in reduced development intensity and greater amounts of open space from that proposed on the Land Use Plan. Exhibits 3 and 4 of this document identify the location and the proposed land use mix of specific plan areas 1, 2, 9, and 10, which are within the existing City limits, and specific plan area 8, which is within the unincorporated planning area. Specific plan area 3 (proposed within the City limits) and specific plan areas 4, 5, 6, and 7 ( proposed within the unincorporated planning area) were studied but were found not to be appropriate for urban development during the time period covered by this Land Use Element (year 2010 buildout) and were not approved. Specific plan areas 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10 have been delineated based on ownership, landform and circulation considerations. Specific plan areas with adjoining boundaries may be combined to allow for a consolidated planning effort where all issues are addressed in a comprehensive manner as required by Government Code Sections 65450- 65457. A detailed description of the issues for each of the specific plan areas is provided in the following subsections. Plana i nq Area Within City Limits As noted on the Land Use Plan, four specific plan areas have been designated within the undeveloped areas of the existing City of Moorpark limits (specific plan areas 1, 2, 9, and 10). These specific plans have been designated to address comprehensively a variety of land use issues including topography, viewshed, and circulation. Each specific plan area will be required to include a minimum of 25 percent of the total acreage for open space. As noted within each of the following specific plan area descriptions, residential densities exceeding the maximum density could be granted at the discretion of the Moorpark City Council if the property owners within the specific plan area agree to provide public improvements, public services, and /or financial contributions that the City Council determines to be of substantial public benefit to the community. Specific plan areas within the City are assigned an overlay designation, as shown on the land use map, to reflect the permitted land uses in absence of an overall specific plan. WA Specific Plan 1 Specific Plan 1 consists of 285 acres under single ownership, located in the western section of the City, north of Poindexter Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks. Gabbert Road crosses the westerly portion of the specific plan area. Generally, the specific plan area is characterized by rolling hillsides which are currently used for grazing purposes. Opportunities and Constraints Specific plan area development issues to be addressed during specific plan preparation and subsequent review will include: Topography - An evaluation of steep slopes, unstable soils, seismic faults, and other geotechnical constraints within the hillside areas of development will be considered during the development/ review of this specific plan. Consistent with City policy, grading is restricted on slopes greater than 20 percent and development prohibited in areas where potential hazards cannot be fully mitigated. Hydrology - An evaluation of existing drainage courses, surface runoff, potential flood hazards and other hydrological constraints will be conducted during the development /review of this specific plan. Viewshed - The visual importance of hillside horizon lines /prominent ridgelines within this specific plan area from surrounding areas will be evaluated during the preparation and review of this specific plan. Clustering of dwelling units should be considered where appropriate to conserve important visual and natural resources. Biological Resources - The significance of biological resources which may occur onsite (i.e., oak trees, threatened, rare, endangered plants and animals, etc.) shall be determined during specific plan preparation. The preservation of any resources determined to be significant shall be encouraged through habitat preservation, enhancement, or replacement. Archaeology - The specific plan area will be evaluated to determine whether archaeological resources occur within the overall plan area and their potential significance. Public Services/ Infrastructure - Water, sewer, gas and electric service to the specific plan area will be provided through service extensions from existing transmission lines in the surrounding area. An evaluation will be conducted during the development of this specific plan regarding required land use set - asides and financing for schools and community services such as fire stations and libraries. ► M 7' Parks - An evaluation will be conducted during the development of this specific plan to identify required park land dedication consistent with the City Municipal Code and General Plan requirements. Circulation - The specific plan area circulation network will require consideration for topographical constraints, viewshed issues, and the adjacent Southern Pacific railroad tracks; shall provide protection for the conceptual alignment of the future SR- 118 freeway corridor; and shall ensure that roadway rights -of -way are protected for the planned roadway upgrades, improvements, and additions as identified in the City's circulation plan. Proposed Land Uses The number of dwelling units shall not exceed 415, unless the specific plan area property owner agrees to provide public improvements, public services and /or financial contributions that the City Council determines to be of substantial public benefit to the community, in which event, the number of dwelling units shall not exceed 620. A minimum of 3 acres of land shall be designated as Public Institutional within this specific plan area. The appropriate amount of land to be designated as Open Space, Park, School, or any other appropriate land use designation, will be determined at the time of specific plan preparation or approval. Overlay Designation - Agriculture 1 (285 acres) Specific Plan 2 Specific Plan 2 consists of 445 acres under single ownership. It is located northerly of the City, east of Walnut Canyon Road and west of College Heights Drive. Generally, the majority of this specific plan area is characterized as a gently sloping plateau with prominent hillsides in the northern section, and is currently vacant and used for seasonal grazing. Opportunities and Constraints Specific plan area development issues will be addressed during specific plan preparation and subsequent review, and include: Topography - Existing steep hillsides within the specific plan area require a complete evaluation of steep slopes, unstable soils, and other potential geotechnical constraints during the development/ review of this specific plan. Consistent with City policy, grading is restricted on slopes greater than 20 percent and development prohibited in areas where potential hazards cannot be fully mitigated. 30 Hydrology - An evaluation of existing drainage courses, surface runoff, potential flood hazards and other hydrological constraints will be conducted during the development/ review of this specific plan. Viewshed - The importance and visibility of hillside horizon lines and prominent ridgelines within this specific plan area from surrounding areas will be evaluated during the preparation and review of the specific plan. Clustering of dwelling units should be considered where appropriate to conserve important visual and natural resources /hazard areas. Biological Resources - The significance of biological resources which may occur onsite (i.e., oak trees, threatened, rare, endangered plants and animals, etc.) shall be determined during specific plan preparation and review. The preservation of any resources determined to be significant shall be encouraged through habitat preservation, enhancement, or replacement. Archaeology - The specific plan area will be evaluated to determine whether archaeological resources occur within the overall plan area and their potential significance. Public Services/ Infrastructure - Water, sewer, gas and electric service to the specific plan area will be provided through service extensions from existing transmission lines in -the surrounding area. An evaluation will be conducted during the development of this specific plan regarding required land use set - asides and financing for schools and community services such as fire stations and libraries. Parks - An evaluation will be conducted during the development of this specific plan to identify required park land dedication consistent with the City Municipal Code and General Plan requirements. Circulation - The specific plan area circulation network will require consideration for topography, viewshed, and for its integration with both the conceptual future freeway alignments for SR -118 and SR -23, and the future Broadway extension. The specific plan shall ensure that roadway right -of -ways are protected for the planned roadway upgrades, improvements and additions as identified in the City's circulation plan. Proposed Land Uses The number of dwelling units shall not exceed 475, unless the specific plan area property owner agrees to provide public improvements, public services and /or financial contributions that the City Council determines to be of substantial public benefit to the community, in which event, the number of dwelling units shall not exceed 712. A minimum of 7 acres of land shall be designated 31 as Public Institutional within this specific plan area. The appropriate amount of land to be designated as Open Space, Park, School, or any other appropriate land use designation, will be determined at the time of specific plan preparation or approval. Overlay Designation - Open Space 1 (300 acres) Rural Low (145 acres) Specific Plan 3 (Deleted) Specific Plan 9 Specific Plan 9 consists of approximately 24.8 acres under one ownership, located in the western section of the City, north of High Street, west of Walnut Canyon Road, and south of Casey Road. This specific plan area consists of the City's former high school site and contains the playing fields and classroom buildings. The area formerly a part of the high school site, that was purchased by the Moorpark Boys and Girls Club, is not part of this specific plan area. Opportunities and Constraints Specific plan area development issues will be addressed during specific plan preparation and subsequent review, and include: Topography - An evaluation of steep slopes, unstable soils and other geotechnical constraints within the hillside areas of development will be conducted during the development /review of this plan. Consistent with City policy, grading is restricted on slopes greater than 20 percent and development prohibited in areas where potential hazards cannot be fully mitigated. Hydrology - An evaluation of existing drainage courses, surface runoff, potential flood hazards and other hydrological constraints will be conducted during the development /review of this specific plan. Viewshed - The importance and visibility of hillside horizon lines and any prominent ridgelines within this specific plan area from surrounding areas will be evaluated during the preparation and review of the specific plan. Clustering of dwelling units should be considered where appropriate to conserve important visual and natural resources /hazard areas. 32 Biological Resources - The significance of biological resources which may occur onsite (i.e., oak trees, threatened, rare, endangered plants and animals, etc.) shall be determined during specific plan preparation and review. The preservation of any resources determined to be significant shall be encouraged through habitat preservation, enhancement, or replacement. Archaeology - The specific plan area will be evaluated to determine whether archaeological resources occur within the overall plan area and their potential significance. Public Services/ Infrastructure - Water, sewer, gas and electric service to the specific plan area will be provided through service extensions from existing transmission lines in the surrounding area. An evaluation will be conducted during the development of this specific plan regarding required land use set - asides and financing for schools and community services such as fire stations and libraries. Parks - An evaluation will be conducted during the development of this specific plan to identify required park 1pLnd dedication consistent with the City Municipal Code and General Plan requirements. Circulation - The specific plan area circulation network will require consideration for its relationship to topographical constraints, viewshed issues, and its relationship to the SR -23 freeway. The specific plan shall ensure that roadway right -of -ways are protected for the planned roadway upgrades, improvements and additions as identified in the City's circulation plan. Proposed Land Uses The number of dwelling units shall not exceed 80, unless the specific plan area property owner agrees to provide public improvements, public services and /or financial contributions that the City Council determines to be of substantial public benefit to the community, in which event, the number of dwelling units shall not'-exceed 120. The appropriate amount of land to be designated as Open Space, Park, or any other appropriate land use designation, will be determined at the time of specific plan preparation or approval. Overlay Designation - School (24.8 acres 33 Specific Plan 10 Specific Plan 10 consists of 70.59 acres under one ownership. This specific plan area is located just east of Walnut Canyon Road, north of Wicks Road, and south of Broadway. The terrain of this specific plan area varies from steep slopes to relatively level land on a gently sloping plateau. Opportunities and Constraints Specific plan area development issues will be addressed during specific plan preparation and subsequent review, and include: Topography - An evaluation of steep slopes, unstable soils and other geotechnical constraints within the hillside areas of development will be conducted during the development /review of this plan. Consistent with City policy, grading is restricted on slopes greater than 20 percent and development prohibited in areas where potential hazards cannot be fully mitigated. Hydrology - An evaluation of existing drainage courses, surface runoff, potential flood hazards and other hydrological constraints will be conducted during the development/ review of this specific plan. Viewshed - The importance and visibility of hillside horizon lines and any prominent ridgelines within this specific plan area from surrounding areas will be evaluated during the preparation and review of the specific plan. Clustering of dwelling units should be considered where appropriate to conserve important visual and natural resources /hazard areas. Biological Resources - The significance of biological resources which may occur onsite (i.e., oak trees, threatened, rare, endangered plants and animals, etc.) shall be determined during specific plan preparation and review. The preservation of any resources determined to be significant shall be encouraged through habitat preservation, enhancement, or replacement. Archaeology - The specific plan area will be evaluated to determine whether archaeological resources occur within the overall plan area and their potential significance. Public Services/ Infrastructure - Water, sewer, gas and electric service to the specific plan area will be provided through service extensions from existing transmission lines in the surrounding area. An evaluation will be conducted during the development of this specific plan regarding required land use set - asides and financing for schools and community services such as fire stations and libraries. 34 Parks - An evaluation will be conducted during the development of this specific plan to identify required park land dedication consistent with the City Municipal Code and General Plan requirements. Circulation - The specific plan area circulation network will require consideration for its relationship to topographical constraints, and viewshed issues, and its relationship to the SR- 118 freeway. The specific plan shall provide protection for the conceptual alignment of the future SR -118 freeway corridor and shall ensure that roadway right -of -ways are protected for the planned roadway upgrades, improvements and additions as identified in the City's circulation plan. Proposed Land Uses The number of dwelling units shall not exceed 154, unless the specific plan area property owner agrees to provide public improvements, public services and /or financial contributions that the City Council determines to be of substantial public benefit to the community, in which event, the number of dwelling units shall not exceed 231. The appropriate amount of land to be designated as Open Space, Park, or any other appropriate land use designation, will be determined at the time of specific plan preparation or approval. Overlay Designation - Rural Low (70.59 acres) Planning Area Outside City Limits As noted on the Land Use Plan, one specific plan area has been designated outside of the existing City of Moorpark limits (Specific Plan Rio. 8), within the area proposed for expansion of the City's sphere of influence. A specific plan for this area is required, and must address comprehensively a variety of land use issues including topography, viewshed, open space, and circulation. A minimum of 25 percent open space must be provided. Specific plan areas 4, 5, 6, and 7 (proposed within the unincorporated planning area) were analyzed in conjunction with the updating of the Land Use Element, but were found not to be appropriate for urban development prior to the year 2010 (General Plan buildout) and were, therefore, not approved. A description of the existing land uses, potential planning issues (opportunities and constraints), and the proposed land use mix for the one specific plan area proposed in the unincorporated planning area is provided below. 35 Specific Plan 4 (Deleted) Specific Plan 5 (Deleted) Specific Plan 6 (Deleted) Specific Plan 7 (Deleted) Specific Plan 8 Specific Plan 8 consists of approximately 4,200 acres, under combined ownership, located northerly of the eastern portion of the City limits, east of Happy Camp Regional Park. Generally, this specific plan area is vacant open space, characterized by steep hillside terrain currently designated as open space. Opportunities and Constraints Specific plan area development issues to be addressed during specific plan preparation and subsequent review will include: Topography - Existing steep hillsides within the specific plan area require a complete evaluation of steep slopes, unstable soils, and other potential geotechnical constraints of the plan area during the development/ review of this specific plan. Consistent with City policy, grading is restricted on slopes greater than 20 percent and development prohibited in areas where potential hazards cannot be fully mitigated. Hydrology - An evaluation of existing drainage courses, surface runoff, potential flood hazards and other hydrological constraints will be conducted during the development/ review of this specific plan. Viewshed - The visual importance of hillside horizon lines /prominent ridgelines within this specific plan area from surrounding areas will be evaluated during the preparation and review of this specific plan. Clustering of dwelling units should be considered where appropriate to conserve important visual and natural resources. 36 Biological Resources - The significance of biological resources which may occur onsite (i.e., oak trees, threatened, rare, endangered plants and animals, etc.) shall be determined during specific plan preparation and review. The preservation of any resources determined to be significant shall be encouraged through habitat preservation, enhancement, or replacement. Archaeology - The specific plan area will be evaluated to determine whether archaeological resources occur within the overall plan area and their potential significance. Agriculture - This specific plan will address the viability and maintenance of the limited "Prime" and "Statewide Significance" farmlands which occur within the plan area. Public Services/ Infrastructure - Water, gas and electric service to the specific plan area _will be provided through improvements within the plan area and service extensions from existing transmission lines in the surrounding area. Sewer service is not currently available and would need to be provided for all urban uses. An evaluation will be conducted during the development of this specific plan regarding required land use set - asides and financing for schools and community services such as fire stations and libraries. Parks - An evaluation will be conducted during the development of this specific plan to identify required park land dedication consistent with the City Municipal Code and General Plan requirements. Circulation - The specific plan area circulation network shall provide consideration for its relationship to topographical constraints and viewshed issues and consideration for connection of the SR -118 and SR -23 freeways as well as the Broadway extension. The specific plan shall ensure that roadway right -of -ways are protected for the planned roadway upgrades, improvements and additions as identified in the City's circulation plan. Proposed Land Uses The number of dwelling units shall not exceed 2,400, unless the specific plan area property owner agrees to provide public improvements, public services and /or financial contributions that the City Council determines to be of substantial public benefit to the community, in which event, the number of dwelling units shall not exceed 3,221. The appropriate amount of land to be designated as Open Space, Park, School, Agricultural, or any other appropriate land use designation, will be determined at the time of specific plan preparation or approval. 37 6.0 LAID USE PLAN STATISTICAL SUNNARY The following table (Land Use Plan - Statistical Summary, Table 3) summarizes the approximate acreage and the number of dwelling units resulting from each of the land use classifications designated on the Land Use Plan maps for the overall planning area (City Area - Exhibit 3, and Unincorporated Area - Exhibit 4). Dwelling unit estimates are based on an estimate of the density which could occur for each residential land use classification based on the maximum density permitted. The actual number of dwelling units constructed and associated population amount will vary with the development conditions and constraints for each project (access, availability of services, geotechnical and natural resource constraints, etc.). In addition, a density increase above the maximum density could be approved, up to the designated density limit for each residential land use category, if public improvements, public services, and /or financial contributions are provided that the City Council determines to be of substantial public benefit to the community. As identified on Table 3, a combined total of up to 14,911 dwelling units could be constructed in the overall planning area, based on maximum density estimates. The resulting buildout population for the Moorpark planning area would be approximately 40,856 persons, based on the County's 2.74 population per dwelling unit factor for the year 2010. The required environmental documentation for future projects shall provide a more detailed level of population per dwelling unit analysis based on the square footage of each dwelling unit and the type of land use for residential subdivisions. Additionally, the Environmental Impact Report prepared for this land use element and circulation element update of the Moorpark General Plan evaluates potential impacts on the service capabilities of relevant infrastructure systems (i.e., sewer, water, police, fire, etc.) associated with the land use designations proposed as a part of this update process. Table 3 USE PLAN - STATISTICAL SUMMARY 39 City Unincorporated Total Plannin Lend Use Destination Area Area Area Combined RL RURAL LOW 1,668 ac 334 du - - 1,668 ac 334 du (1 du/5 acres maximum) RH RURAL HIGH 208 ac 208 du - - 208 ac 208 du (1 dw%cre maximum) L LOW DENSITY 168 ac 168 du - - 168 ac 168 du (1 dwlacre maximum) ML MEDIUM LOW DENSITY 568 ac 1,136 du - - ,568 ac 1,136 du (2 duhm maximum) M MEDIUM DENSITY 1,174 ac 4,696 du - - 1,174 ac 4A96 du (4 dulacre maximum) H HIGH DENSITY 343 ac 2,401 du - - 343 ac 2,401 du , (7 dwfacre maximum) VH VERY HIGH DENSITY 161 ac 2,415 du - - 161 ac 2,415 du (15 data= maximum SP SPECIFIC PLAN* SP 1 LEVY 282 ac 415 du - - 282 ac 415 du SP 2 JSR 438 ac 475 du - - 438 ac 475 du SP 9 MUSD 25 ac 80 du - - 25 ac 80 du SP 10 scalL VE 71 ac 154 du - - 71 ac 154 du 8P 8 MESSENGER 4,200 ac 2,400 du 4,200 ac 2,400 du Gl NEIGHBORHOOD CObUdERCIAL 9 ac - - - 9 ac - (.25 FAR) G2 GENERAL COKM ERCIAL 181 ac - - 184 ac - (.25 FAR) C-I C0101BCIA1,MUSTRIAL 13 ac - - 13 ac - (.38 FAR) I -1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 263 ac - - 263 ac - (.38 FAR) I -2 MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL 285 ac - - 285 ac - (.38 FAR) AG1 AGRICULTURE 1 45 ac 1 du - - 45 ac 1 du (1 dut10 -40 acres) 39 City Unincorporated Total Planning Land Use Desi®ation Area Area Area Cambmed AG2 AGRICULTURE 2 - - - - - (1 dW40 acres) 081 OPEN SPACE 1 16 ac 1 du - - 16 ac 1 du (1 du/10.40 acres) 092 OPEN SPACE 2 1.064 ac 27 du - - 1,084 ac 27 du (1 du/40 acres) S SCHOOL 357 ac - - 357 ac P PASS 197 ac - - 197 ac U UTELJTM 47 ac - - - 47 ac PUB PUBLIC 16 ac - - - 16 ac INSTITUTIONAL FRWY FREEWAY 297 ac - - 297 ac R/W EIGHT -OF -WAY TOTAL DWELLING UNI'T'S" 12,511 du 2,400 du 14,911 du (At Buiildout - Year 2010) TOTAL POPULATION' 34,280 6,576 40,856 (At Bu9dout - Year 2010) TOTAL CrIT AREA ACRES (Apprommate) 7,916 ac TOTAL UNINCORPORATED AREA ACRES (Approumate) 4,200 ac TOTAL PLANNING AREA COMBINED (Approximate) 12,116 ac ' Acreage for open space, schools, parka, commercial, highway right -of -way, and any other appropriate land uses will be determined at time of specific plan approvaL Residential Density calculations for specific plan areas are based on the —d-um density. Section 52 of the Land Use Element allows the City Council to approve a density exceeding the maximum density, up to an identified density limit, if public improvements, public services, and/or financial contributions are provided that the City Council determines to be of substantial public benefit to the community. If the density limit is approved for SP's 1, 2, 9, 10, and 8, the total dwelling units would increase from 14,911 to 16X1 and the total population would increase from 40,856 to 44,637 (these density limit estimates were used as the basis for determining the * if> ance of impacts in the Final Environmental Impact Report and the Findings required by Section 15091 of CEQA). "' Based on 2.74 persons per dwelling uni 40 7.0 IMPLEXENTATION The City of Moorpark has several implementation measures available to carry out its adopted goals. Within the Land Use Element itself, policies have been developed which call for specific implementing actions to be taken by the City. Other policies are set forth which call for subsequent programs and actions to be taken which will implement the provisions of the general plan. Defined as an action, procedure, program or technique that carries out general plan policy, the Implementation Measures contained in this section are intended to assist the City in realizing the goals and policies of the Land Use Element and ensure that required mitigation measures are accomplished. The adoption of a zoning ordinance is the City's principal instrument for implementing the general plan and is derived from the police power given to the City. This ordinance regulates land use by dividing the City into zones and specifying permitted uses, allowable development intensities, minimum lot size, building height and setback limits, and other development parameters within each land use zone. Zoning designations which are compatible with the Land Use classifications of the General Plan are illustrated on the General Plan /Zoning Compatibility Matrix (Exhibit 6). Other implementation measures derived from the city's police power include the city's power to regulate subdivisions; to adopt specific plans; to enforce building housing codes; to establish park dedication requirements; to utilize environmental and design review procedures when considering development proposals; to require the construction of streets, water, and sewer facilities, and to require the acquisition and development of parkland, the acquisition of sites for low income housing, and the acquisition of open space, conservation, or scenic easements. Because the general plan is based on community values and an understanding of existing and projected conditions and needs (which continually change), it is important to monitor and review the general plan regularly. As indicated in the State of California General Plan Guidelines, components of the plan that have a short - term focus, such as the implementation program, should be reviewed annually and revised as necessary to reflect the availability of new implementation tools, changes in funding sources, and the results of monitoring the effectiveness of past decisions. At least every five (5) years this element shall be evaluated regarding its consistency with other General Plan elements and community goals. 4L Implementation Measures 1. Use the Land Use Element to promote a balanced City growth pattern and land use compatibility, maintain the City's suburban /rural character, revitalize the downtown area, preserve important natural features and biological and cultural resources, and require that overall intensity and density of land use decreases away from the valley floor. 2. Implement provisions of, review, and amend as necessary the other elements of the City's general plan, including the following: Update open Space, Conservation and Recreation Element to ensure consistency of open space and park designations and policies with the Land Use Element. Update Noise Element to reflect the City's planned circulation system as identified in the Circulation Element. Update Safety Element to reflect potential hazard areas in relation to proposed land uses as identified in the Land Use Element. Update Housing Element to reflect revised Land Use Element. 3. Consider preparation of additional elements of the general plan (such as Community Design, Economic Development, Public Services, Air Quality, Financial) in order to encourage further implementation of provisions contained within the Land Use Element. 4. Adopt and enforce a City noise ordinance which includes time restrictions for construction activities. 5. : Utilize the State Subdivision Map Act to regulate the design and improvement of subdivisions within the City. 6. Utilize Development Agreements in order to assist in attaining public objectives and implementing general plan goals and policies. All development agreements and /or affordable housing agreements shall be approved prior to any entitlement being approved. 7. Review, update and expand the City's Capital Improvement Program in order to project annual expenditures for acquisition, construction rehabilitation and replacement of public buildings and facilities. 42 8. Utilize the City's adopted Building and Housing Codes in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public and to further implement the goals and policies of the Land Use Element. 9. Implement the recommendations of the March 1987 Central City Drainage Study. 10. Utilize land acquisition methods in order to acquire land designated for public use and for public purposes such as urban redevelopment. Support similar methods utilized by other public agencies providing services and facilities that serve the City and its sphere of influence. 11. Utilize conservation, open space and scenic easements as a means of conserving open space in accordance with the Land Use Plan and to further implement the goals and Policies of the Land Use Element. 12. Utilize a variety of methods to finance the facilities and services needed to implement the Land Use Element goals and policies. Primary local funding sources include taxes, exactions, fees and assessments. State and federal funding sources include a broad range of grant and loan programs which the City should use to finance the implementation of the general plan. Funding sources may include loans, grants, bonds and other financial assistance programs available for housing, energy, historic preservation, noise mitigation, parks, recreation and open space, public schools, solid waste management, and transportation issues. 13. Base all official regulatory land use and development control decisions on consistency with the Land Use Element. Periodic review of all implementation measures shall be made in order to ensure consistency with the Land Use Plan. 14., Coordinate with the County of Ventura in order to promote consistency with the Countywide Planning Program (CPP) so as to update countywide growth /non - growth boundaries and Population projections to reflect the City's Land Use and Circulation Elements. Amend the City's existing growth control ordinance, as necessary, to maintain consistency with the CPP. 15. Utilize the City's adopted growth management ordinance in order to achieve a steady rate of residential growth while providing for adequate public services and facilities. 43 16. Submit an application to the Ventura County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to amend the City's sphere of influence boundary, consistent with the approved Land Use Plan, to allow for proper planning of the probable, ultimate physical boundaries and service area of the City. 17. Utilize specific plans in the undeveloped areas of the City as a tool for the systematic implementation of the General Plan and in order to achieve a long -term cohesive development program which is responsive to the physical and economic opportunities and constraints of each individual specific plan area. General standards for specific plan preparation and evaluation are outlined in Appendix A. 18. Utilize the specific plan process to ensure that adequate buffer areas exists between viable agricultural resources and residential areas. 19. Coordinate with the County of Ventura in order to update and identify areas of viable "prime" and statewide significance" agricultural land. implement the goals and policies of the Land Use Element on an ongoing basis to ensure that viable 'prime" and "statewide significance" agricultural land is preserved. 20. Utilize the City's Redevelopment Plan in order to eliminate and prevent the spread of blight in the Redevelopment Plan Project Area and to encourage the revitalization of the downtown commercial core area. 21. Utilize the goals and recommendations outlined within the City's adopted Downtown Study to guide the revitalization of downtown Moorpark, recapture and promote the downtown's small town concept, and maintain downtown existing historical elements. 22. Prepare a specific plan for the downtown study area, which contains specific standards and detailed design measures, in order to promote the revitalization of the downtown commercial core. 23. Coordinate with other public agencies and adopt updated master plans for sewer, water, utility, flood control and solid waste services. 24. Coordinate with other public agencies to minimize public service /infrastructure costs and to maintain adequate levels of service. 44 25. Prepare a hillside development ordinance in order to ensure sensitive hillside development by regulating development on slopes greater than 10 percent, restricting grading on slopes greater than 20 percent, protecting visually prominent horizon lines within hillside areas, and protecting environmentally sensitive areas. 26. Utilize the City's mature tree ordinance in order to implement preservation guidelines for mature oaks and other mature trees. 27. Prepare a master community design plan for the City which includes a design concept plan for special treatment areas within the community and identifies overall community concepts for landscape architecture, architecture, signage, streetscapes, identifiable entryways, and community gateway areas. 28. Prepare an art in public places ordinance which requires works of art or artistic elements to be included as a part of commercial and industrial development projects and includes an in -lieu fee consideration where .the decision- making body determines that it is impractical to require the provision of public art. 29. Conduct a study of the feasibility of adopting an inclusionary zoning ordinance, which would require that a percentage of new, private residential development be affordable to low- and moderate- income households. 30. Conduct a study of the feasibility of adopting a housing trust fund ordinance to require developers of non - residential projects to provide housing or contribute an in -lieu fee that goes into an affordable housing trust fund. 31. Prepare a grading ordinance which requires the incorporation of adequate erosion control measures into development projects that may otherwise impact water resources adversely. Such measures shall include sandbagging of newly graded slopes, prompt planting of disturbed areas, phasing of grading and construction activities to minimize exposed areas susceptible to erosion and the routing of runoff flows through desilting basins prior to discharge into any watercourse. 32. Adopt and enforce a water efficiency landscape ordinance, consistent with the State Model Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance, by January 1, 1993. 33. Implement a waste reduction program to achieve a 25 percent diversion of solid waste to landfil.s. 4` 34. Work with the business and development community to encourage an increase in sales tax capture. 35. Establish and implement a business attraction, promotion, and retention plan. 46 APPENDIX A SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMRNT REQUIREKENTS A major goal of the specific plan process is to ensure that development occurs in an orderly fashion, with due regard to environmental factors. In addition to the potential planning issues identified for each individual specific plan within Section V.2. of the Land Use Element, outlined below is a summary of those items which should be included or discussed in a specific plan document. The Community Development Department may require from an applicant such other information as deemed necessary in evaluating a proposed project. SPECIFIC PLAN CONTENTS Land Use Plan: A detailed land use plan will be prepared indicating specific land use locations, type, intensities, and other site characteristics, and describing residential areas, commercial areas, recreation areas, open space areas (minimum 25 percent), agricultural areas, community facilities (including public school facilities), and any other proposed uses consistent with the stan- dard range and mix of land uses assigned to each Specific Plan Area. The actual acreage and locations of development which occur within each specific plan will be based on evaluation criteria (included within this appendix) the City will consider in determining whether a plan is appropriate for the area concerned. Based upon the City's implementation of the Land Use Element Goals and Policies, specific plan areas containing significant constraints may result in reduced development intensity and greater amounts of open space from that proposed on the Land Use Plan. Project statistical analysis shall also be included which tabulates and summarizes land uses, acreage, and square footage. Circulation Plan: Circulation components of the land use plan (vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian) will be prepared addressing hierarchy, required improvements and development standards. 47 Infrastructure Plan: Infrastructure systems necessary to support the Land Use Plan will be prepared to address improvement requirements for water facilities, wastewater facilities, drainage facilities, and other utilities. Community Design Plan: A community design plan will be prepared to illustrate the techniques proposed to enhance the overall community character. Community design plan components will include a conceptual landscape plan, architectural design guidelines (including architectural style, materials, colors, fencing, and walls, etc.) and a conceptual mass grading plan. Implementation Plan: An implementation plan will be prepared which identifies site development standards (including permitted uses, setbacks, height limitations, etc.), administrative procedures for plan modifications and fiscal impact analysis. Phasing Plan: A phasing plan will be prepared which identifies development stages and major infrastructure improvements required to service the stages of development and landscape improvement timing. Conformance A determination of consistency analysis with General Plan: between the general plan elements and proposed development activities will be prepared. EVALUATION CRITERIA Subsequent to completion of any draft specific plan, the City Council will review the plan and shall consider a number of factors in determining whether the plan is appropriate for the area under consideration. These criteria include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Land use considerations 1. Compatibility of development with surrounding area and land uses 2. Conformance with all adopted general plan elements 3. Relationship of land uses within the specific plan area 4. Circulation, utilities and other infrastructure and public service needs M B. Natural resource /topographic considerations 1. Slopes 2. Soil characteristics 3. Drainage patterns 4. Watersheds, and floodplains 5. Faults, landslides and liquefaction 6. Shallow groundwater 7. Viewshed considerations C. Environmental considerations 1. Air quality 2. Water quality 3. Noise 4. Vegetation 5. Wildlife 6. Aesthetics (including community design and scenic areas) 7. Historic /cultural areas (including those of archaeological /paleontological importance) 8. Grading D. Economic considerations 1. Tax base 2. Employment 3. Demographic effects 4. Community facilities and services 5. Market need 49 MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 CITY OF MOORPARK GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT Prepared for: CITY OF MOORPARK Prepared by: AUSTIN -FOUST ASSOCIATES 2020 North Tustin Avenue Santa Ana, California 92701 Adopted by the Ctty Council c,n May 13, 1992 EXHIBIT 2 TO RESOLUTION 92 -856 TAI I I v JR City Council Mayor Paul W. Lawrason, Jr. Mayor Pro Tem John E. Wozniak Councilmember Scott Montgomery Councilmember Bernardo Perez Councilmember Roy Talley, Jr. Former Councilmember Eloise Brown Former Councilmember Clinton Harper Planning Co®ission Chairman Michael Wesner, Jr. Vice Chairman John Torres Commissioner Barton Miller Commissioner Steve Brodsky Commissioner Christina May Former Commissioner Glen Schmidt Former Commissioner Bill Lanahan Former Commissioner Michael Scullin City Staff Steven Kueny, City Manager Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development Deborah Traffenstedt, Senior Planner Kathleen Mallory Phipps, Associate Planner Craig Malin, Assistant Planner Charles Abbott, City Engineer John Knipe, Former City Engineer *-111A TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 Form and Scope of this Element 2 2.0 CIRCULATION ISSUES 3 Regional Transportation Corridors 3 City Street System 3 Future Growth 4 Transit System 4 Bicycle, Pedestrian and Equestrian Facilities 4 Transportation Demand Management 4 3.0 GOALS AND POLICIES 5 General 5 Level of Service 6 Roadway Standards 7 Transit System 8 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities 8 Equestrian Facilities 10 Transportation Demand Management 10 4.0 IMPL OONTATION 11 5.0 ROADWAY CIRCULATION PLAN 14 Roadway Facility Designations 14 Level of Service 17 Circulation System 18 6.0 BIKEWAY PLAN 21 7.0 EQUESTRIAN FACILITY PLAN 23 i I LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES Page No. Exhibit No. Title 1 Roadway Classifications 15 2 Circulation Element Highway Network 19 3 Circulation Element Bikeway Network 22 4 Circulation Element Equestrian Trail Network 24 Table No. Title 1 Standards for Roadway Levels of Service 16 2 ADT Capacities 17 ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION The main purpose of this element is to designate a safe and efficient circulation system which promotes the movement of people and goods in and around the City. The Circulation Element is also concerned with establishing goals, policies, and implementation measures which will ensure that all components of the system will meet the future transportation needs of the City. The General Plan Traffic Analysis technical report and the General Plan Update EIR Circulation Analysis prepared by Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. provide background information and act as supporting documents for the Circulation Element. Included as part of the General Plan update circulation analysis was the development of the Moorpark Traffic Analysis Model (MTAM), a computerized citywide model designed to estimate future demands on the City of Moorpark circulation system. Continued use of the traffic forecasting model in future circulation system impact analyses, and as the technical basis in the establishment of a citywide transportation improvement fee program is specified within the implementation program portion of this Element. As part of the General Plan, update, a special study of land use and circulation issues in the City limits as well as in the unincorporated area surrounding the City was undertaken. The current incorporated City area combined with an area of unincorporated land immediately adjacent to the City are referred to as the "planning area" throughout this element. As stated in Section 65302(b) of the Government Code, the Circulation Element indicates the "general location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, terminals and other public utilities and facilities, all correlated with the Land Use Element of the general plan ". Items of particular concern to the City of Moorpark include: • Streets, highways and freeways; • Truck traffic; • Public transit; • Bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian facilities; • Transportation demand management (e.g. carpooling, vanpooling). The Circulation Element addresses the circulation facilities needed to provide adequate roadway capacity, public transit services, and opportunities for other modes of transportation. FORM AND SCOPE OF THIS ELEMENT This element contains goals and policies designed to improve overall circulation in the City of Moorpark and to address circulation issues that concern the City at the present time. In order to assist in realizing the defined goals and policies, implementation measures are outlined together with a description of the circulation plan for roadways, bikeways, and equestrian facilities. For highway transportation, the circulation plan involves a network of existing and future roadways defined according to designated roadway types, each with specific design standards. Bikeway and equestrian trail networks and standards are also defined. ET 2.0 CIRCULATION ISSUES The following circulation issues General Plan Update process and ar policies, implementation measures contained in this document. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORS have been identified in the e addressed within the goals, and Circulation Element maps State Routes 23 and 118 currently pass through the City of Moorpark as conventional highways. While a connection of the existing SR -23 and SR -118 freeways is planned for the near future, north -south and east -west regional traffic will continue to pass through the City on the same arterial routes being used today. Since these regional facilities are projected to carry high volumes of truck traffic, issues of safety, congestion and noise with respect to future traffic demands are of concern. Potential alternative transportation corridors for the two State Routes would serve to alleviate adverse conditions projected for the future. CITY STREET SYSTEM The existing street system in Moorpark is a combination of fully and partially improved roadways. Portions of the street system were originally designed and constructed prior to the City's incorporation and were originally designed to perform at a lower capacity, typical of a rural community. As Moorpark continues to grow, the interface of a developing urban area with rural street capacities is resulting in traffic bottlenecks and reduced levels of service, particularly during peak hour periods. Adverse conditions are compounded with the growth of regional pass - through traffic on the conventional highway facilities within the existing street system. There are various physical factors which influence the safe and efficient flow of traffic on the City's street system. Among these factors are street width, on- street parking, frequency of driveways, railroad crossings, intersection location and intersection configuration. The City's traffic signal network is without adequate interconnection and a system to monitor and maintain signal operation. K; 100e Y Y Projections based on buildout of the Land Use Element indicate significant increases in traffic within the City limits and the surrounding planning area. A planned system of roadways is needed to serve currently undeveloped areas which are planned for development both within the City and in outlying regions. Continuity of facilities connecting future development with existing development is a key objective in the design of a planned network of roadways. TRANSIT SYSTEM The City currently has a public transportation system which serves the needs of persons living in and /or working in the community. BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES The citywide network of bicycle and pedestrian routes for commuter, school and recreational use is only partially established. The lack of a continuous bikeway system inhibit$ the bicycle from becoming an attractive means of transportation in the City. The City's recreational equestrian trail system is only partially established. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT The City currently lacks a comprehensive and coordinated program for implementing Transportation Demand Management strategies. 1 3.0 GOALS AND POLICIES The following goals and policies form the basis for providing a circulation system which adequately serves the development intensity anticipated in the Land Use Element and which represents the desires of the community for adequate mobility and accessibility. The Circulation Element policies are intended to guide the City so that both governmental and private activities contribute to meeting the goals of the Circulation Element. GENERAL Goal 1: Provide a transportation system that supports land use plan in the General Plan and the the safe and efficient movement of provides for and services within, into, out of, and tlhroughhtthe e City of Moorpark. Policy 1.1: The completion of the ultimate circulation system, through the improvement of sub- standard roadway segments and intersections and the construction of missing roadway links and related facilities shall be actively promoted. Policy 1.2: Local freeway improvements, and the construction and /or extensions of State Routes 23 and 118 as an arterial roadway or freeway shall be supported by requiring development projects to dedicate right - of-way, pay a development impact fee, and /or construct certain improvements as determined necessary to avoid significant traffic /circulation impacts. Policy 1.3: Caltrans shall be encouraged to include special landscape treatments and sound walls or earthen berms in the design of freeway sections which will be visible and audible from residential areas within the City of Moorpark. Policy 1.4: New residential streets should be designed so as to discourage pass - through trips which do not begin nor end within the residential area served by the street. Policy 1.5: The improvement and modification of rail transportation facilities shall be encouraged in order to promote safety and to minimize impacts on local circulation and on noise sensitive land uses. Policy 1.6: Every five years the City's buildout circulation plan shall be reviewed and, if necessary, updated. Recommendations shall be made for needed revisions to the Circulation Element of Ventura County, related to the needs of the City of Moorpark. Policy 1.7: Roadways, pedestrian signs and utilities shall be designed t while providing for 1 passage of vehicles, bicycles. LEVEL OF SERVICE areas, walks, street name in applicable outlying areas :) convey a rural appearance ow maintenance costs and safe pedestrians, equestrians, and Goal 2: Provide a circulation system which supports existing, approved and planned land uses throughout the City while maintaining a desired level of service on all streets and at all intersections. Policy 2.1: Level of service "C" shall be the system performance objective for traffic volumes on the circulation system. For roadways and interchanges already operating at less than level of service "C ", the system performance objective shall be to maintain or improve the current level of service. Policy 2.2: Project phasing shall be coordinated with the construction of on -site and off -site circulation improvements to maintain the performance standards objectives specified in Policy 2.1 and to ensure that improvements are in place when needed. Policy 2.3: New development projects shall mitigate off -site traffic impacts to the maximum extent feasible. Policy 2.4: All new development shall participate in a transportation improvement fee program. This fee enables circulation improvements to be funded by new development in a manner that maintains the performance objectives specified in Policy 2.1. Policy 2.5: Driveway access points onto arterial roadways shall be limited in number and location in order to ensure the smooth and safe flow of vehicles and bicycles. Policy 2.6: Secondary access should be required for projects located in the middle of a block adjacent to a limited- access arterial. N M* Policy 3.3: Roadways in hillside areas shall not have a significant, adverse impact on the natural contours of the land; grading for streets shall be minimized; and harsh cut slopes which may not heal into natural appeari.ng surfaces shall be avoided. Policy 2.7: Traffic signal or stop sign installation shall be required at intersections which, based on individual study, are shown to satisfy traffic signal or stop sign warrants. Policy 2.8: A program of traffic signal interconnection and computerization shall be implemented to improve traffic progression and the monitoring and maintenance of the City's traffic signals. Policy 2.9: Guidelines for the determination of appropriate intersection sight distance shall be prepared that are consistent with accepted traffic engineering practice. Policy 2.10: On- street parking on any new arterial streets shall be prohibited. For existing arterial streets with parking allowed, special studies should be carried out to ensure off - street parking adequacy to prior prohibiting on- street parking. Policy 2.11: Adequate off - street parking shall, be provided in all new or expanded projects as part of construction. Policy 2.12: Signalization at major entrances to commercial projects shall be required if determined necessary based on traffic conditions. ROADWAY STANDARDS Goal 3: Adopt and maintain a set of roadway standards and transportation system design criteria which supports and maintains the desired character of the City of Moorpark. Policy 3.1: A set of roadway design standards which specify right -of -way, roadway cross - sections, and other design criteria for designated roadway classifications shall be adopted and maintained. Policy 3.2: Planting and substantial landscaping shall occur along major arterials to mitigate visual impacts and erosion problems. Policy 3.3: Roadways in hillside areas shall not have a significant, adverse impact on the natural contours of the land; grading for streets shall be minimized; and harsh cut slopes which may not heal into natural appeari.ng surfaces shall be avoided. TRANSIT SYSTEM Coal 4:. Provide a public transportation system which serves the needs of persons living in and/or working in the City of Moorpark. Policy 4.1: Participation in a public transit system that provides a means of intra -city and inter -city transportation, as a logical alternative to automobile transportation, should be developed or maintained. Policy 4.2: Proposed developments shall include transit facilities, such as bus benches, shelters, pads or turn -outs, where appropriate, in their improvement plans, or as needed in proximity to their development. Policy 4.3: Programs aimed at enhancing the mobility of senior citizens and the handicapped shall be implemented and expanded where feasible. BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Goal 5: Provide a citywide system of safe, efficient and attractive bicycle and pedestrian routes for commuter, school, and recreational use. Policy 5.1: New development and redevelopment projects shall be required to include safe, separate, and convenient paths for bicycles and pedestrians so as to encourage these alternate forms of non - polluting transportation. y. Policy 3.4: New collector streets in hillside areas shall be required to have curb and gutter and graded shoulders, and on- street parking shall be prohibited, as necessary, in order to provide extra safety. Policy 3.5: Private streets shall be required to be improved to public street standards prior to dedication to the City. Policy 3.6: The use of landscaped medians on arterial streets shall be encouraged in an effort to preserve the image of the community. Policy 3.7: Rural and hillside road standards shall be developed, including standards for landscaping, levels of service, and road widths. TRANSIT SYSTEM Coal 4:. Provide a public transportation system which serves the needs of persons living in and/or working in the City of Moorpark. Policy 4.1: Participation in a public transit system that provides a means of intra -city and inter -city transportation, as a logical alternative to automobile transportation, should be developed or maintained. Policy 4.2: Proposed developments shall include transit facilities, such as bus benches, shelters, pads or turn -outs, where appropriate, in their improvement plans, or as needed in proximity to their development. Policy 4.3: Programs aimed at enhancing the mobility of senior citizens and the handicapped shall be implemented and expanded where feasible. BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Goal 5: Provide a citywide system of safe, efficient and attractive bicycle and pedestrian routes for commuter, school, and recreational use. Policy 5.1: New development and redevelopment projects shall be required to include safe, separate, and convenient paths for bicycles and pedestrians so as to encourage these alternate forms of non - polluting transportation. ZME Policy 5.2: Plans for bicycle and pedestrian facilities shall give priority to providing continuity and closing gaps in the bikeway and sidewalk network. Policy 5.3: Proposed residential, commercial, and industrial developments shall be required to include bikeways in their street improvement plans, consistent with the Circulation Element Bikeway Network Plan, and to construct the bicycle paths, or lanes, or routes as a condition of project approval. Policy 5.4: Development projects shall be required to participate in the funding of planned bikeways which would allow employees to utilize bicycles as an alternative to automobiles. Policy 5.5: The provision and maintenance of off - street bicycle paths shall be encouraged. Policy 5.6: Bicycle racks shall be required and storage facilities sr. -41t. be encouraged at new or modified public, commercial, and industrial building sites. Policy 5.7: The installation of sidewalks shall be required for all new roadway construction and significant reconstruction of existing roadways, with the exception of hillside areas. If installation of sidewalks in hillside areas would result in significant grading impacts or a safety concern, special consideration shall be given to either eliminating the need for sidewalks or requiring along one side of the street only. Policy 5.8: Along arterial and collector roadways, requiring the use of meandering sidewalks or the provision of landscaping between the curb and sidewalk shall be given consideration for all new projects proposed in commercial and industrial areas. Policy 5.9: The design of unobstructed sidewalks, when included as part of roadway improvement plans, shall follow accepted traffic engineering practice. Policy 5.10: The installation of appropriately located handicapped ramp curb -cuts shall be required for all new roadway construction and significant reconstruction of existing roadways. Policy 7.1: To reduce energy consumption, noise pollution and air pollution, employment generating developments shall provide incentives to employees to utilize alternatives to the conventional automobile, such as walking, bicycles, carpools, vanpools, buses, and commuter rail. Policy 7.2: Industrial and commercial businesses shall be EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES encouraged to use flex time, staggered working hours and other Goal 6: Provide equestrian trails for recreational use. Policy 6.1: New development projects shall provide equestrian trail linkages to regional parks and to regional trail systems consistent with the Circulation Element Equestrian Trail Network Plan. Policy 6.2: New residential developments shall be encouraged to provide equestrian paths. Policy 6.3: Multi -use equestrian, bicycle, and pedestrian Policy 7.5: trails shall be encouraged wherever feasible. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT Goal 7: Develop and encourage a transportation demand Policy 7.6: management system to assist in mitigating traffic impacts and in maintaining a desired level of service on the circulation system. Policy 7.1: To reduce energy consumption, noise pollution and air pollution, employment generating developments shall provide incentives to employees to utilize alternatives to the conventional automobile, such as walking, bicycles, carpools, vanpools, buses, and commuter rail. Policy 7.2: Industrial and commercial businesses shall be encouraged to use flex time, staggered working hours and other means to lessen commuter traffic. Policy 7.3: Alternate forms of public and private transit which give routing, scheduling and planning priority to the work force, youth, handicapped, senior citizens and shoppers shall be provided to the extent feasible. Policy 7.4: The use of multiple- occupancy vehicle programs for shopping, business and other uses shall be encouraged to reduce vehicle trips. Policy 7.5: State and national legislation directed at encouraging the use of carpools and vanpools shall be supported. Policy 7.6: The Ventura County Air Pollution Control District shall be supported in its effort to implement transportation demand management strategies. Policy 7.7: The City shall develop a program for expending transportation demand management funds collected as mitigation for project air quality impacts. 4-0 IMPT.RMENTATION Within the Circulation Element, policies have been developed which call for specific implementing actions to be taken or enforced by the City. Defined as an action, procedure, program or technique that carries out General Plan policy, the following implementation measures are intended to assist the City in realizing the goals and Policies of the Circulation Element. 1. The City Engineer's office and Community Development Department shall monitor the existing and proposed street systems on a regular basis to identify current and potential problem areas and to develop solutions. 2. The City Engineer's office and the Community Development Department shall utilize the citywide traffic forecasting model to determine immediate and cumulative impacts of proposed developments on the City's transportation system. The traffic model database shall be monitored, and periodic model update and recalibration shall be carried out as warranted by base and future year land use and circulation database revisions. 3. Every five years the City Engineer's office and the Community Development Department shall review and make recommendations to the City Council for needed revisions to the City's buildout circulation plan as well as the Ventura County Circulation Element as it relates to the needs of the City of Moorpark. 4. The City Engineer's office shall prepare and maintain a circulation facility design manual containing roadway standards which specify right -of -way, number of lanes, typical cross - sections and parking restrictions according to designated arterial classifications. Included will be design guidelines for driveway placement, intersection site distance, dedicated turn lanes, stop sign installation, medians, landscaping, bike lanes, bike paths, sidewalks, and equestrian trails. Rural and hillside road standards for road widths, grading, pathways, pedestrian areas walks landscaping, street name signs, and utilities shall also be included. g. 5. The City Engineer's office and the Community Development Department shall use the development review process to ensure that the design of local street improvement plans will not encourage pass- through vehicle trips within residential developments. 11 y. .,.. 6. The City Engineer's office and the Community Development Department shall use the development review process to ensure that new or expanded development projects mitigate off -site traffic impacts to the maximum extent feasible, coordinate project phasing with the construction of on -site and off -site circulation improvements which maintain the specific level of service performance standard, provide adequate off - street parking, and where feasible, provide secondary side street access for projects located in the middle of a block adjacent to a limited access arterial. 7. A program of traffic signal interconnection and computerization shall be implemented by the City Engineer's office and the Public Works Department to improve traffic progression and the monitoring and maintenance of the City's traffic signals. S. The City Council shall adopt a transportation improvement fee program which will enable circulation (roadway and bikeway) improvements to be funded by new development and, in conjunction with the City's capital improvement program, will determine estimated dates for construction. A phasing/ improvement plan shall be included that identifies project specific improvement responsibilities and requires fair share funding for cumulative circulation improvements. Roadway and bikeway improvements which mitigate specific project related impacts shall be constructed or funded by the individual project applicant. Project applicants shall also be required to participate in the fair share funding program. The traffic forecasting model shall be used to evaluate specific project impacts and shall serve as the traffic share technical basis in establishing the transportation improvement fee program. 9. The City shall continue to work toward the implementation of improved transit services as a logical alternative to automobile transportation. 10. The City Engineer's office and the Community Development Department shall use the development review process to ensure that proposed developments shall include bikeways and equestrian trails in their street improvement plans consistent with the Circulation Element Bikeway and Equestrian Trail Network Plans. 11. The Community Development Department shall develop and the City Council shall adopt a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordinance to encourage new and existing employers to participate in TDM programs. 12 12. The Community Development Department shall develop a program for implementing TDM strategies, including a list of projects or activities which will be funded by transportation systems management funds collected as mitigation for significant air quality impacts. 13 5.0 ROADWAY CIRCULATION PLAN This section of the Circulation Element defines a roadway plan that meets the requirements for safe and convenient movement at the development intensity anticipated in the Land Use Element. It includes a classification system that applies to all roadways that serve the City, and identifies specific improvements that will be required to implement this plan. ROADWAY FACILITY DESIGNATIONS The future roadway system in the Moorpark planning area is defined using a classification system which describes a hierarchy of facility types. The categories included in this classification system differentiate the size, function and capacity for each type of roadway. There are five basic categories in the hierarchy, ranging from "freeway" with the highest capacity to "local collector" with the lowest capacity. These five categories of roadways can be summarized as follows: • Freeway - A four- to ten -lane divided roadway with full access control, grade separations at all intersections and a typical right -of -way width in excess of 150 feet, designed and maintained by the State Department of Transportation. • Six -Lane Arterial - A six -lane roadway with no on- street parking, a typical right -of -way width of 110 -120 feet and curb to curb pavement width of 90 -104 feet, and which may have controlled access. • Four -Lane Arterial - A four -lane roadway with a typical right -of -way width of 80 -100 feet and a curb to curb pavement width of 60 -80 feet, and which may have controlled access and restricted parking. • Rural Collector - A two- to four -lane roadway with a typical right -of -way of 70 -90 feet and a curb to curb pavement width of 54 -64 feet. An upgrade from two to four lanes is to be determined as development occurs in rural areas within the City sphere. • Local Collector - A two -lane roadway with a typical right -of -way width of 50 -70 feet and a curb to curb pavement width of 36 -54 feet. Industrial areas would require the wider dimension to allow for a center turn lane and to provide more space for truck maneuvering. In hillside areas, the minimum dimension may be allowed, but graded shoulders are required and on- street parking is prohibited in order to provide extra safety. 14 F! n C d 3 i w Sic Ianc Arterial - A ax -Ianc roadway with no on- street parlmg, a typical right -of -way width of 110 -170 feet and curb to curb p.avcrncni width of 90.104 feet, and which may have conirullcd access Four -l.inc Artcn :il - A tour -Ianc roadway with a typical right - of -way width of 80.100 feet and a curb to curb pavement width of w-80 feet, and which may have controlled acoesa and rmincial purling. 4" I,,,u -wnc ruadwuy with a typkal r,61,1 of wdy of 70 9Q feel and a curb to curb pavement width of 5464 feet. Ati upgrade from two to four lanes is to be Jcicr a :uacJ as &,,clopmeni ixcurs in rural areas within the city si.hcrc I . K.al C.,liccinr - A two -Ianc roadway with a typical right-of -way w,Jth of 50.70 feet and a curb to curb pavement width of 36.54 feet industrial areas would require the wider dimension to allow for a center turn lane and to provide more space for truck n­nr­rr-nnK In iiinaidc picas, Ilic mhihnuin dhncnrlon may be .111111L J. Imt Swded ihoulders are required and on- slrecl 1 ji,ml; is pioluhrled in ordcl to provide cxira iafciy. 10' 8' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 1 8' 1 10' 110' — 120' R.O.W. ss>a�s s 1 1 !1 IV 1� a- ie�: 11 1 1 • 1 I Figure 1 ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS Table l STANDARDS FOR ROADWAY LEVELS OF SERVICE' LEVEL OF SERVICE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A Primarily free flow operations at average travel speeds usually about 90 percent of free flow speed. Vehicles can maneuver unimpeded within the traffic stream. Delay at signalized intersections is minimal. B Reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds usually about 70 percent of free flow speed. Ability to maneuver is only slightly restricted and stopped delays are not bothersome. Drivers are not subjected to appreciable tension. C Represents stable operations, however, ability to maneuver and change lanes in midblock locations may be more restricted Longer queues and /or adverse signal coordination may contribute to lower average travel speeds of about 50 percent of free -flow speed. Drivers will experience some appreciable tension. D Borders on a range in which small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in approach delay, and hence, decreases in arterial speed. Causes range from adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or any combination. For planning purposes, this Level of Service is the lowest that is considered acceptable. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of free -flow speed. E Characterized by significant approach delays and average travel speeds of one - third of free -flow speed or lower, caused by adverse progression, high signal density, extensive queuing at critical intersections, inappropriate signal timing, or some combination. F Characterized by arterial flow at extremely low speeds below one -third to one - quarter of free flow speed. Congestion is likely at critical signalized intersections, resulting in high approach delays. Adverse progression is frequently a contributor to this condition. ' From arterial highway section of 1985 Capacity Manual Moorpark Circulation Flemrnt Austin Fount As'%octates. hic. �. Nr : <: i Schematic cross- sections of each category of arterial roadway are provided in Figure 1. Variation in right -of -way width and specific road improvements will occur within each of the roadway classifications, based on existing conditions and other factors. In particular, the median width in six -lane and four -lane roadways will vary according to the area being served and the available right -of -way. Typically the median width for six -lane and four - lane roadways should be raised as shown in Figure 1. Any of the arterial classifications listed above may deviate from the standards where physical constraints exist or where preservation of community character dictates special treatment. -IM. LEVEL OF SERVICE A roadway's ability to handle existing and future projected traffic loads can be described in terms of level of service, or LOS. The LOS is a measure of traffic operating conditions as outlined in Table 1, and is based on prevailing traffic volumes in relation to roadway capacity. The following table lists representative ADT capacities for the various types of arterial roadways considered in the Circulation Element. These capacities represent the general level of daily traffic that each roadway type can carry and should be used as general design guidelines only. Level of service for the circulation system is more precisely determined by examining peak hour intersection volumes, and therefore the Circulation Element uses peak hour volumes as a basis for determining appropriate capacity needs. 17 Table 2 ADT CAPACITIES ROADWAY RIGHT - LEVEL OF SERVICE' CLASSIFICATION WID'T'H OF -WAY C D E Six -Lane Arterial 90' -104' 110' - 120' 42,000 48,000 52,000 Four -Lane Arterial 60' -80' 80' -100' 26,000 29,000 32,000 Four-Lane Rural Collector 54' -64' 70'-90' 22,000 25,000 28,000 Two-Lane Local Collector 30' -54' 50' -70' 10,000 12,000 14,000 ' Capacities listed represent threshold capacities for entry into the next lower level of service. These capacities represent the general level of daily traffic that each roadway type can carry and should be used as general design guidelines only. Level of service for the circulation system is more precisely determined by examining peak hour intersection volumes, and therefore the Circulation Element uses peak hour volumes as a basis for determining appropriate capacity needs. 17 One of the policies included in this Element states that the City will attempt to achieve and maintain level of service "C" as a system performance standard for traffic volumes on the roadway system and as a basic design guideline for roadways in the City. CIRCULATION SYSTEM The goals and policies included in the Circulation Element emphasize the need for a circulation system that is capable of serving both existing and future residents while preserving community values and character. The location, design, and constituent modes of the circulation system have major impacts on air quality, noise, community appearance, and other elements of the environment. The highway network designated in the Circulation Element is illustrated in Figure 2, and indicates all of the designated freeways, six -lane arterials, four -lane arterials, and rural collectors. In addition, a selected number of designated local collectors, which carry through traffic, are indicated on the map. Any permanent closure to through traffic or relocation of the designated arterials and collectors will require a General Plan Amendment. Highway facilities are shown within the current City limits as well as for the surrounding planning area that has been defined for the General Plan Update. Existing and potential future traffic signal locations within the i City limits are also indicated on the highway network map, as are existing and potential at -grade and grade separated railroad crossing locations. Traffic signal warrants are satisfied for the locations shown here based on current traffic projections. Traffic signalization may be required at minor street and driveway locations not shown on the Circulation Element highway network map. A grade separated railroad crossing is shown only for the future SR -118 bypass arterial crossing. Grade separation is not considered feasible at the four existing railroad crossings (Gabbert Road, Moorpark Avenue, Spring Road, and Los Angeles Averiue) . The roadway network in the Circulation Element indicates a number of improvements with regard to the existing roadway system in the Moorpark planning area. The following are the more important improvements that will need to be implemented: • Connection of the SR -118 and SR -23 freeways with new interchanges at Collins Drive and Princeton Avenue. S1 --7 \ �% ,,, 11 T LEfiEND ==� FREEWAY AML IT [qTFRCUANGE =ME � SIX-LANE ARTERIAI )UR4-AffE ARTI RIAI -R- RURAL COLLLC-TOR LOCAL ('01 ll.(-T()R ■ 116\vAl lzf 1) 1%-rf R11 l 714)% T GRAIA RR (- R01SLN6 El •;LADE ',!,?AIRATT I' -4R 7' -Y LIFT :V )l ND4R) smummons A 1 )A I RFi �.Al FIGURE 2 CITY OF MOORPARK GENFRAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT HIGHWAY NETWORK May 13 1992 // 1�. �'"!//. uQ'/// �!& e�2 !/!//!ll�::;e"w:>%/!/ ///!s'.i� �;:! �%.. �:x1d! /.G:'». / /,;;ua:`a`"1'�lG� .,�3::C�✓l4�CG: S��Y':17i %�2;�i ".•, s�;. sr; N,ll/ aaw\ �:%/!/ L .ba\, \�:,'(L(!!i /'.�,�:!�i.?;„� • Provision of an east /west SR -118 arterial bypass from the SR -23 /SR -118 connector to Los Angeles Avenue west of Butter Creek Road, without a connection to Walnut Canyon Road, and recognition of a potential future SR -118 freeway extension west of the City limits. • Provision of a north /south SR -23 arterial bypass from the SR -23 /SR -118 connector to Broadway Road. • Extension of Spring Road north to the SR -23 arterial bypass. • Provision of a local collector system to serve circulation needs in the northwest portion of the City. Local collectors added to the existing circulation system include an extension of Casey Road to Gabbert Road, "C" Street between Grimes Canyon Road and the SR- 23 arterial bypass, and "D" Street between Princeton Avenue and the SR -23 arterial bypass. • Provision of a roadway system to serve circulation needs in the Carlsberg Specific Plan (Moorpark Highlands) area in the southeast portion of the City. Roadways added to the existing circulation system include an extension of Science Drive from New Los Angeles Avenue to Tierra Rejada Road, and an extension of Peach Hill Road to Science Drive. • Provision of an eastern extension of Broadway Road potentially connecting with Alamos Canyon Road and the SR -118 freeway to serve circulation needs of potential future development in the portion of the planning area northeast of the City limits. :c y riG' it as5` i�, CAi' itiib('/ 6: tJiYfil G;:',:, U .l� % % "':�:�iyaa�i.l�.��aii'�I�y 6.0 BIREFTAY PLAN The bikeway network designated in the Circulation Element is illustrated on Figure 3. Bikeways within the current City limits as well as possible bikeway linkages in the surrounding unincorporated area are shown on Figure 3. The bikeway system within the City limits will consist of three types of facilities as follows: Class I Bikeway (Bike Path): This is a special type of facility that is designed for exclusive use by bicyclists. A bike path may be located adjacent to a roadway though it is physically separated from vehicular traffic by a barrier, grade separation or open space. Cross flows by vehicles and pedestrians are allowed but minimized. The minimum paved width for a two -way bike path shall be 8 feet. The minimum paved width for a one- way bike path shall be five feet. A minimum two -foot wide graded area shall be provided adjacent to the pavement. Class II Bikeway (Bike Lane): A bike lane consists of a paved area for preferential use of bicycles and is located between the travel lane closest to the curb and the curb. Pavement markings and signage indicate the presence of a bike lane on the roadway. Per the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, the Class II bike lane width is four feet on a street without curbs and gutters with parking off the pavement, five feet on curbed streets with marked parking (bike lanes are located between the parking area and the traffic lanes) and on curbed streets where parking is prohibited, and 11 to 12 feet on curbed streets with parking permitted, but without marked parking areas. Class III Bikeway (Bike Route): This type of bicycle facility refers to a conventional street where bike routes are indicated by sign only. There are no specially paved bikeways and bicycle traffic shares the roadway with motorized traffic. Only Class III facilities which connect the Moorpark sphere with the regional bikeway system are identified in the bikeway network. Roadways which are not designated with a Class II bikeway, but which serve as connections between Class II facilities or the regional bikeway system should be considered as Class III bikeways. 21 111111//011111 CLASS I BNEWAY (BTKE PATH) A fac*ry dewed for esclusrre use by Dines and pnvwxa&!, acpa cd fsva v<hKwlar rrafRc by a b&�. V"c acpvaooe or aprn sP� Cron -flan by rChKles rd pedestn.m+&Owed blw teaaamlood Mason CLASS II BIKEWAY 9: \f I.,"E) A pared arc. -- . roaduar dm"led for referential use of bmcyctes Parcae marl..`, and ,.tnage �rvcatc the p,ru a of a We hr ,i d. \\\\\\ l LASS III :i' \f 'A. N i j \- •tr)C•Tf t a +her. ,�,r „ir, .1 v�..0 cd .. v(. mn ne•r arr �.. , penal tu•c -,n +a:..,., ,nd .c,rx •rJf6l + -err, r ]rtr (Iola (lau III tai :c, t lan.r<t �'- \loorpola a. «< .nth the rcrlN•Jl t ac - nrr Wl— 11! i,c 1.a'.]• on. drre'arr;; ..,�r �'r h,lr -a. �a +n,;• .r �.� e .,nor.. -a vl•.rc, 'I la, .l.�rr, •a ,r•<'re,i r'.w Mar -. FIGURE 3 CITY OF MOORPARK GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT BIKEWAY ELEMENT May 13. 1992 7.0 EQUESTRIAN FACILITY PLAN The equestrian trail network designated in the Circulation Element is illustrated on Figure 4. Equestrian trails within the current City limits as well as possible equestrian trail linkages in the surrounding unincorporated area are shown on Figure 4. Bicycle use on equestrian trails is generally considered compatible; however, not all trails may be appropriate for bicycle use due to sandy soils or steep terrain. The designated development criteria for the design of an equestrian facility is as follows: • Trails can be unimproved paths. • Trails shall be a minimum of 12 feet in width. • Equestrian and hiking trails are compatible uses and can be shared. • Equestrian trails and hiking trails are generally compatible with hike paths, although a minimum width of 14 tt:.:.L may be determined necessary for joint use. • With Fire Department approval, trails shall be developed along existing fire roads. • Wherever possible, trails shall serve as connectors to the region. The equestrian trail map included as part of the Circulation Element shall be used as a reference. 23 b O � 90001s0w:410000000•0000 ••..• ' c snl> >Ef • • • •••••••••• eov or • 1 • j • • 1.— . —. —. —. � i i • g. • j • • • � i IE 000.0 :•" • 1 j •y'+� ••• i 0000•• • ;0000 • ,!p(jY•0 r A ii o.y •\ [ R • •� Of �, TAn • • • ••• •• LEGEND ••0000 EQUESTRIAN TRAILS - - - CITY LIMIT BOUNDARY ..000..0•'. ..........•.•......• so 0 ---o.- �._._._._._ .••. i A i • so • • i 0 s _ ••• CAM►L'S fARA ••• :••`•••• tit ,ry 0000• 00.0::: � • FIGURE 4 CITY OF MOORPARK GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT EOLIESTRIAN TRAIL NETWORK MAY 13 . 1992 MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss. CITY OF MOORPARK ) I, Lillian E. Kellerman, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 92 -856 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on the 7th day of AUGUST , 1992, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS MONTGOMERY, PEREZ, TALLEY, WOZNIAK AND NOES: MAYOR LAWRASON NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City tPis 7th day of AUGUST 1992. l;illian E. Kel erman City Clerk (sea 1) PAUI D! I AVyM;0N JR J('HN M iO4AHt)CG t,4 I'I �'J Al I I r JH Krj' .r `.t ty u� i'r r i . ,r r do :1 -nlh r rnc.l n:�vr; • -r