The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES CC 1992 893 1992 1118e- ; P1 Jecl /I/le7/93 RESOLUTION NO. 92- 893 CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MOORPARK, STATE OF CALIFORNT. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SCHEDULE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PROCESSING FEE DEPOSITS JANUARY 18 , 1993 , AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION 92 -833 WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark provides planning services; and WHEREAS, the cost of this service will be offset by fees which accompany land use entitlement requests; and WHEREAS, Community development staff costs are Charged against fees, rased on real time cost accounting; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1. That the Community Development staff shall bill actual time spent on land use applications at a real time cost accounting rate of $75.00 per hour. SECTION 2. Contract Planning Staff shall be billed at cost, plus fifteen percent (1-15%). SECTION 3. That the schedule of Land Development Preliminary Processing Fee Deposits shall be as identified as those revised fees shown on Attachment "A" to this resolution. SECTION 4. That this resolution shall be effective January 18, 1993. SECTION 5. That Resolution No. 92 -833, A RESOLUTION FIXING REAL TIME COST ACCOUNTING FEES FOR PLANNING STAFF AND ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF LAND DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PROCESSING FEE DEPOSITS; adopted February 5th, 1992, is hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 1992. ATTEST Lillian E. City Clerk Paul W. awrason J--Y', mayor City of Moorpark ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF MOORPARK LAND USE DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SCHEDULE (Revised January 6, 1993) The following pages represent the schedule of fees and deposits applicable to .Sand Use Development processing. In general, the fee and deposit amounts listed on the schedule represent the average amount of.staff hours required for each type of application, times the current fee rate of $75 per hour. These amounts constitute the requirement of the City from the applicant for deposit or €ee payment to initiate City work on an application for a Land Use Development permit. The schedule has been divided into two sections; 1) deposits, and; 21 flat fees. The following information is provided in order to describe the distinction between "deposits" and "flat fees" associated with the City's Land Use Development processing schedule. 1) DEPOSITS In the "Deposit Schedule," permit numbers 1 through 21, the final cost to the applicant is calculated on an actual time expended by the City, (based on the established hourly rate mentioned above). If the final cost is less than the deposit amount received, the unused portion shall be refunded to the applicant. If the final cost exceeds the deposit amount received, the balance shall be payable by the applicant up to ?5 0 of the original deposit, unless otherwise specified. If the cost of processing is anticipated to be more than the original deposit, plus 750 of said deposit, the City Council may approve collection of an additional deposit as they deem appropriate, unless otherwise specified. New for 1993 is a fee and policy for deposits relating to "Specific Plan" applications, deposit number 17. This deposit amount is not subject to a cap. Staff will administer the deposit by sending written communication to the applicant when the amount spent by the City is at 80% of the original deposit which requests an additional deposit amount from the applicant equal to a 90 day estimate of additional expenses to be incurred. All unexpended portions of the deposits made to the City are held in a trust fund until the final applicable costs have been calculated for the completed application. The unused portion of the deposit will be returned to the applicant. 2 ) FLAT FEES The schedule for "fiat fees" begins with number 22, and continues through permit type number 28. For the purpose of this resolution, a flat fee is a non - refundable one time fee of a specified amount intended to account for the average cost of processing the type of permit specified Land Use Development Processing Deposit Schedule ATTACHMENT "A" PLANNING FEE SCHEDULE 05— Jan -93 Page-1— DEPOSITS — This portion of the fee schedule is for deposit amounts only. Some City Land Use Development Processing is based on a "Flat Fee." "Flat Fees" are listed after the deposit portion of the schedule, beginning with Permit No. 22, Permit No. Permit Type Deposit Additional Comments Amount Amount 1 Preliminary Review Fee $750.00 2 Planned Development a. Mobile Home Pak $1,661.00 plus 1135 per pad b. Residential $1,661.00 plus 8.35 per pad 3 Commercial Planned Development $1,828.00 4 Industrial Planned Development $1,994.00 5 Conditional Use & Open Space Permit a. Residential & Accessory Uses $1,329.00 b. Agricultural & Accessory Use $1,828.00 c. Commercial, Industrial, Institutional Uses $2,325.00 d. Oil Drilling & Production $3,160.00 e. Quarries & Mining $4,983.00 f. Waste Dis osal(Treatment $4,983.00 6 City Attorney — when applicable $2,500.00 Contract Services also include City consultant work related to Environmental Impact Studies, Police Department Review — when applicable $300.00 Hydrology Studies and Review of Geological Studies. The Consultant wig estimate the deposit required based on each individual application. 7 Zone Change $2,076.00 A Zone Change application filed concurrently with a Tentative Tract Map and /or Residential Planned Development Permit, the deposit amount for the Zone Change shall be reduced by 50 %. 8 Tentative Tract Map Deposits (Also see "Flat Fee ", No. 22) a. Tentative Tract Map $2,990.00 plus 51120 per lot b. Tentative Parcel Map, Parcel Map Waiver $2,325.00 c. Time Edension of Approved Tentative Tract Map 50% of current deposit amount d. Time Extension of Approved Tentative Parcel Map 50% of current deposit amount 9 Variance $1,412.00 a. Existing Single Family Residential $355.00 10 Major Modification 80% of current deposit amount 11 Minor Modlication 20% of curent deposit amount or $49a which ever is greater. 12 Appeal 25% of current deposit amount or $498, which ever is greater. 13 Environmental Impact Study In addition to specific applications of the depositfor an environmental report required. a. Initial Environmental Study Review (including Neg. Dec.) $1,250.00 b. Environmental Impact Report $3,322.00 If filed concurrently with a Tentative Tract map, the Residential Planned Development Permit shag c. Environmental Imapct Report Supplement $1,661.00 be reduced by 50% d. Special Consultants 14 Land Conservation Act Contract (Agricultural Preserves) a. Applications $1,329.00 b. Cancelation $1,329.00 c. Portion Non — Renewable $1,329.00 15 Landscape Plan Review & Inspection $576.00 16 General Plan Amendments $1,661.00 plus 8.31 per acre 17 Specific Plan $5,000.00 plus $5.00 /lot City will receive 1001/6 of cost from applicant (No Cap). Staff will inform applicant of additional 18 Condition Compliance review. 100% of original deposit costs anticipated for 90 days, when 800% of Initial Deposit has been spent. 19 Zoning Maps 1005% of original deposit 20 Traffic Model Use Deposit amount determined by staff. 21 Other 100% of original deposit Occasionally, special reviews are required and not addressed specifically by this schedule, such Development, based on the nature of the review. Land Use Development Processing Deposit Schedule ATTACHMENT "A" PLANNING FEE SCHEDULE 05— Jan -93 Page —2— MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss. CITY OF MOORPARK ) I, Lillian E. Hare, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 92 -893 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at.a meeting held on the 18th day of NOVEMBER , 1992, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS MONTGOMERY, PEREZ, TALLEY, WOZNIAK AND MAYOR LAWRASON NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 6th day of JANUARY 1993. PAut W LAWRASON JR JOHN E. WOZNIAK Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Lillian E. Hare City Clerk SCOTT MONTGOMERY BERNARDO M PEKE; Councilmember Councilmember ROY F TAI I F� .il? counc-lmemt —, P,,n!er• O.,