The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES CC 1993 919 1993 0303RESOLUTION NO. 93- 919 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THAT THE CITY OF MOORPARK HAS NO AT -RISK "ASSISTED HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS" PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65583(a)(8) WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65583(a)(8) requires local jurisdictions to perform an analysis of existing "Assisted Housing Developments" that are at risk of having affordability control subsidies terminate within the jurisdiction's ten -year analysis period; and WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark's ten -year analysis period is between July of 1989 and July of 1999; and WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark has analyzed the existence of "Assisted Housing Developments" and has prepared the attached checklist confirming the lack of at -risk multifamily rental units pursuant to Government Code Section 65583(a)(8); and WHEREAS, the Inventory of Federally Subsidized Low - income Rental Units at Risk of Conversion, 1991, does not identify any multifamily rental housing units in Moorpark that are at risk within the City's ten -year analysis period; and WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark has no multifamily dwelling units subsidized with Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) Section 515 Rental Housing Loans; and WHEREAS, the only federally subsidized low - income rental units in the City, the Tafoya Terrace Apartments (30 total units), are owned and managed by the Ventura County Area Housing Authority, supported by the federal Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Agency conventional low -rent public housing program, and are not at risk; and WHEREAS, the Annual Summary: The Use of Housing Revenue Bond Proceeds, California Debt Advisory Commission, 1991, does identify that a multifamily housing bond was issued for the Moorpark Le Club Apartments (370 total units), but no conversion date is given; and WHEREAS, there is a 30 -year density bonus agreement for the Moorpark Le Club Apartments which requires that 20 percent (74 units) of the total apartment units be reserved for low- and moderate - income tenants through thE' year 2015; and WHEREAS, no Community Development Block Grant funds have been used within the City of Moorpark to subsidize multifamily rental units; and Resolution No. 93- 919 Page 2 WHEREAS, no redevelopment funds have been used in the City of Moorpark to subsidize multifamily rental units; and WHEREAS, the City of Moorpark does not currently have a housing trust fund (in -lieu fee) or Lnclusionary zoning program; and WHEREAS, the findings of no at -risk dwelling units, as described above, will be reevaluated and discussed in the next five -year revision of the Housing Element of the Moorpark General Plan, due in July 1994; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: The Moorpark City Council certifies that the City of Moorpark has no multifamily rental units at risk of having affordability control subsidies terminate under the provisions of Government Code Section 65583(a)(8). PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 3rd DAY OF MARCH 1993. Paul W. Lhodrason Jr., yor ATTEST: `-Lillian E. Hare' City Clerk Attachment: Checklist to Confir:T'rack of At -Risk Units Pursuant to Government Code Section 65583(a)(8) Attachment A CHECKLIST TO CONFIRM LACK OF AT -RISK UNITS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65583(A)(8) Jurisdiction Cit, of M(-)c) ;,�rk 1. HUD programs: Date March 3, 1993 Section 8 Lower - Income Rental Assistance project -based programs: New Construction Substantial or Moderate Rehabilitation Property Disposition Loan Management Set -Aside Section 101 Rent Supplements Section 213 Cooperative Housing Insurance Section 221(d)(3) Below- Market - Interest -Rate Mortgage Insurance Program Section 236 Interest Reduction Payment Program Section 202 Direct Loans for Elderly or Handicapped x there are no such units for our jurisdiction listed in the Inventory of Federally Subsidized Rental Units At Risk of Conversion, 1990 or subsequent updated information made available by HPD units for our jurisdiction in the above inventory are not at risk during the ten -year analysis period; no units are at risk until (year). 2. Community Development Block Grant program (CDBG) jurisdiction has not used CDBG funds x jurisdiction has not used CDBG funds for multifamily rental units although CDBG funds have been used for multifamily rental rehabilitation, staff responsible for this program indicate there are no affected units because 3. Redevelopment programs jurisdiction does not have a redevelopment agency x redevelopment funds have not been used on multifamily rental units; or 1 Page Two Attachment A Checklist although redevelopment funds have been used for multifamily rental units, staff responsible for this program indicate there are no affected units because a) income - restrictions for occupancy were not required for existing units, or b) other reasons: 4. FmHA Section 515 Rural Rental Housing Loans jurisdiction has not been located in a qualifying rural FmHA area _ x according to information made available by HPD, there are no such eligible projects reported by FmHA within the community or unincorporated area FmHA staff checked the status of (name) development(s) and reported that it is not eligible for prepayment or not eligible for prepayment within the ten -year analysis period. 5. State and local multifamily revenue bond programs no bond - financed units eligible to terminate affordability controls within the next ten years were reported in the following publication: 1990 Annual Summary: The Use of Housing Revenue Bond Proceeds, California Debt Advisory Commission, and local housing authority staff indicate there are no such units within the community. 6. Local in -lieu fee programs or inclusionary programs x jurisdiction has not had an in -lieu fee or inciusionary program staff responsible for these programs indicate no affected units 2 Page Three Attachment A Checklist 7. Developments which obtained a density bonus and direct government assistance pursuant to Government Code Section 65916. jurisdiction has no projects approved pursuant to this law —x staff responsible for this program indicate no affected units B. Additional comments related to any of the above: 5 & 7 - 'rhe Moorpark Le Club Apartment protect received multifamily revenue bond fiancing and there is also a density bonus agreement pursuant to Government Code Section 65916. A total of 74 units are required to be reserved for low and moderate income households. Those .nits arc• not at risk during the ten -year analysis period (,1s1y 1981' - ,July 1999), since the density bonus agreement - equires 2!- percent of the total apartment units to be af`ordable t:. low and moderate income households through the y ,r: � Imwb: preserve. he prt `ODD IO` MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss. CITY OF MOORPARK ) I, Lillian E. Hare, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. _ 93 -919 _ was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on the 3rd day of MARCH - _ , 19113, and that the same was adopted by the following voce: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS HUNTER, MONTGOMERY, PEREZ, WOZNIAK AND MAYOR LAWRASON NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 4th day of MARCH - - _ - - - — - , 1993. PAUL W LAWRASON JR Mayor SCOTT MONTGOMERY Mayor Pro Tem Lillian F. Hare City ('lerk PA?;ilCI, HIJNiEH 1rn iimem -)(rr BERNARDO M PEREZ JOHN E WOZNIAK Counalmember Counolmember