The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES CC 1994 1011 1994 0202RESOLUTION NUMBER 94 -1011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NUMBER 93 -2 FOR THE CALTRANS MAINTENANCE FACILITY LOCATED EAST OF THE MINOR STREET AND FITCH AVENUE INTERSECTION (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 512 -0- 150 -515) WHEREAS, at the City Council meeting of February 2, 1994 the City Council considered approval of the Negative Declaration and Industrial Planned Development Permit Number 93 -2 for the construction of a California Department of Transportation ( CALTRANS) Maintenance Facility on a 4.15 acre parcel located east of the Minor Street and Fitch Avenue intersection in the City of Moorpark; and WHEREAS, staff prepared an Initial Study to assess the environmental impacts associated with the proposed project and it was determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, the City Council after review and consideration of the information contained in the Staff Report, Negative Declaration, and Initial Study, has found that as currently planned, the proposed project will not have adverse impacts on the public health, safety and welfare; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resource Code of the State of California {beginning at Section 21000}), the City Council of the City of Moorpark approves the Negative Declaration for the proposed project and finds that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 2. The City Council approves Industrial Planned Development 93 -2 filed by the City of Moorpark for the siting of a Caltrans Maintenance Facility. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2nd day of February, 1994. ' Paul W. Lawrason, Jr., Oyor ATTEST: MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 CITY OF MOORPARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlement: Caltrans Maintenance Station IPD- 93- 2 /LLA -93 -11 2. Applicant: City of Moorpark 3. Proposal: The proposed project is a new Caltrans maintenance station to provide facilities for road and landscape maintenance crews serving Routes 118, 23, and a small section of 101. A lot line adjustment is also proposed to vacate road and driveway easements and make minor adjustments to property line boundaries. 4. Location & Parcel Number(s): A 4.15 -acre parcel located east of the Minor Street and Fitch Avenue intersection in the City of Moorpark. Legal Description: Parcel 2, 21PM2, Records of Ventura County Assessor's Parcel No.: 512 -0- 150 -515 5. Responsible Agencies: Caltrans II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Community Development Department to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study, it has been determined that this project could not have a significant effect upon the environment. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Public Notice: Publication of a notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the area. 2. Document Posting Period: December 23, 1993 through January 27, 1994. Prepared by: Approved by: Deborah S. Traffenstedt 4 e R. Aguilera, Director Senior Planner of Community Development 1-2-7-94 Date Dates PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. SCOTT MONTGOMERY PATRICK HUNTER BERNARDO M. PEREZ JOHN E. WOZNIAK Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Coundimember Coundimember Councilmember Printed on Recycled Paper MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 CITY OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIAL STUDY (805) 529 -6864 Entitlement: Caltrans Maintenance Station IPD- 93- 2 /LLA -93 -11 Date of Draft Initial Study: December 22, 1993 Date of Final Initial Study: January 27, 1994 Name of Applicant: City of Moorpark Location of Project: A 4.15 -acre parcel located east of the Minor Street and Fitch Avenue intersection in the City of Moorpark. Legal Description: Parcel 2, 21PM2, Records of Ventura County Assessor's Parcel No.: 512 -0- 150 -515 General Plan Land Use Designation: I -1, Light Industrial Present Land Use: Vacant parcel. Existing Zoning: M -1, Industrial Park Agency Staff Contact: City of Moorpark Deborah S. Traffenstedt Senior Planner 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 (805) 529 -6864, ext. 236 I. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION: Location: The new Caltrans Moorpark Maintenance Station is proposed to be constructed on a 4.15 -acre parcel located east of the Minor Street and Fitch Avenue intersection, in an industrial park, in the City of Moorpark (refer to Figures 1 and 2, Regional and Site Location Maps). Spring Road is located approximately 600 feet west of the project site, Los Angeles Avenue is located approximately 1,300 feet to the south, and the Southern Pacific railroad right -of -way is located approximately 200 feet to the north. Access is to project site is from Spring Road to Flinn Avenue and then left on Minor Street and right on Fitch Avenue. Secondary access is also available from Flinn Avenue to Zachary Street. PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. SCOTT MONTGOMERY PATRICK HUNTER BERNARDO M. PEREZ JOHN E. WOZNIAK Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Counalmember Councilmember Printed on Recyded Paper I -al =mmmmmm� VENTURA COUNTY i - -- - wy °dv N4vENTURA 4 C er axIM PORT HUENEME W E ® e Is ° 10 • L��ATfU�Y D.f'.O .OMee..7 , r THOUSAND 1 e Q � - iP�6' /�JY�4L LOL'.4T./OiY 1'E11iT�/�PA �o!/iVTy FIGURE 1 - VTTT &W,�- A-))%, n "N1Nn \ \ 'riv,%gwv111,-#111 imw i 4 r 'J ll r [��r�^ �: o \vim• �� \r' \` -�` -c► ;,_., �: —�! l', —rte; .�;!'^„ -= ): �� "� •Ii� �` � - �,�\,' —�.. _ - .;'s < -`y =:� _ y 1 p. VC" ), 'K� ` �•e/� � o �:,1 � � �, - -- 1"�,l.J \� �!I'. N/�q �.� � 7 iFL- 1111! yi r n .P" .� b 1\ w1 :.1 �•C.. _ �f � •�•��y y � it R'• ,,�+ - _ '`. " ^i� ri /: ;�..�; �. � ✓ ply, O • .!- \ L '1 . ...• % ,= `� • - _ .• `.`"� .. _ — K� ^/ — -inioT. -jam: =ti: °�i,+"i— �'•`',w' f:; ^ L (1'.% / =e_ :- o flig -�!� "n`F � / /i/ ,l .- �i�r•c• -'• �.u. -0C�;t?+ rl /f!} ariy' jl Ay 63I O ,_�: O:fr:;_.; --_` r.5imi Valley _ -- y 11ooi� ark \ ..• �- _Q z v 1% C I i AVE • -° ... — ��i� 1 •: t • -�'_ • '�1 -'tom - \\�T1;1 L✓� -.' ON "�,'•�'K79 V. QL � 56611 ✓' _ -�. ,_• , _- _ l +F LOCATION MAP Source: U.S-G.S. Moorpark and Simi Quadrangles, 1969. Ia L.�mlect No- IPD-93-2 MOORPARK 111 I Date: 12/16/93 Revised: FIGURE 2 4 Pro'iect- Caltrans and the City have adopted a Memorandum of Understanding, agreeing to work cooperatively to relocate the Caltrans Maintenance Station to the Fitch Avenue site. The City is, therefore, acting as the Lead Agency in the preparation of the environmental document to meet the requirements of CEQA. The City will also process and achieve approval of an industrial planned development permit and lot line adjustment for the maintenance station project. Industrial Planned Development - The proposed planned development is a new Caltrans Maintenance Station to provide facilities for road and landscape maintenance crews serving Routes 118, 23, and a small section of 101 (refer to Figure 3 for area of maintenance responsibility). The proposed facility would include a superintendent's office, landscape specialist office, supervisor office, crew meeting rooms, men's and women's restrooms, men's and women's locker and shower rooms, equipment storage and service bays, utility room, mechanic's room, and a waste oil storage area. Appurtenant building area proposed includes a combination cleaner room, fertilizer storage, herbicide storage, gas and oil log room, materials storage room, and hazardous material storage. Appurtenant non- building area is proposed to include the following: material bins, fuel island, emulsion tank, vehicle wash rack, and waste oil storage pad. The total building floor area is proposed to be 8,126 square feet, and the total appurtenant non - building area is proposed to be 2,600 square feet. Proposed employee and visitor parking would total 35 stalls (35 x 400 = 14,000 square feet), and the parking area for equipment is proposed to include various sized spaces for a total area of 16,800 square feet. Figures 4 and 5 show the proposed maintenance station's design, including site plan, elevations, and floor plan. The existing Moorpark Maintenance Station, is located on a 2.0 -acre lot along the south side of Los Angeles Avenue, west of Park Lane. Three crews (two road and one landscape) totaling 26 employees are currently housed at the existing facility. In the next ten years, 30 employees (21 men and 9 women) are planned to be stationed at the Moorpark Maintenance Station. The existing facility on Los Angeles Avenue was constructed in 1946, and is considered by Caltrans to be antiquated. The structures on that site do not meet current maintenance standards. Lot Line Adjustment - A lot line adjustment is proposed to vacate road and driveway easements and make minor adjustments to property line boundaries. Lot line adjustments are exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15305 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Alternatives: Reference is made to the 1992 Caltrans approved Negative Declaration and Initial Study for the Moorpark Maintenance Station Relocation to the Southwest Quadrant of New Los Angeles Avenue and the Route 23 Interchange, which includes a complete description of the alternative sites initially analyzed by Caltrans prior to completion of the referenced environmental document. Caltrans' reasons for discarding other alternatives from consideration are also given in the 1992 Caltrans Negative Declaration/ Initial Study. Because of strong City opposition to the relocation of the maintenance station to the southwest quadrant of New Los Angeles Avenue and the Route 23 interchange, Caltrans and the City have adopted a Memorandum of Understanding, agreeing to work cooperatively to relocate the maintenance station to the Fitch Avenue site. The City considers the Fitch Avenue site to be superior, because the location of the maintenance station at that location would result in the least environmental impacts in comparison to the other alternative sites analyzed. BARDSDALE SANTA PAULA— 000 1 D G R A N rA U 'I A, A 4 0 1, NS. G M 0 A /V _1lD_ IA-11'A 100RPAR1 COY jl�,lll I 1.0 moo R-ky Pk. 0 LONY ¢EE A. -VA �Lk: Y-1 LL MOORPARK HOME ACRES RES .W VALLE SUSANA CAMARILLq, HEIGHTS M p0SA5 HILLS 5 KNOLLS CHATSWORTH 'a vAj([y U .10 vjIL LAS + 'A TH LAKE I L T 11L. CH Loy SAP /IA Pg MAHOR "D$o To ..:q 7 ...... c "'D i�T LEI V. I / l, L L "k, )NYL N N dc u pfSlaKrf° -- R, 11 CAMARU �z= miPe RPOAT -1 EL. 70g, si AIRPOAT 1-1 IA. I 1AD10 CAM L CANOGA PARK E., :x EA's 5T DIE, C""i- M"' E J (D HE BURY PARK —A ... .... WOOD AN Hl LS VENTU P ... ... All- THOUSAND I HIC�DN, 14ILL,,S,�_ RD RA OAKS ALA, 101 ER - tr HILL CALABASAS•Q EL .:-� ' HIGHLANDS WES LAKE ' 1i �l VILLAGE GLEXYIEW Smdvoe,. Pk. IL 80a 5! S A /V, VALLEY AGOURA ERR Lo Jolla Ph. TM ll VAI M 0 N I c A,, _ AV AI No cepwEq. N1 AtP POINT mucti 1 A m 0 U PAILK STATE L__ av iddl. Point LG S—d". 'j,". t.g.— Pow (mu 9 A;Au lL c_ A aa.r pAcfflc OPA 6A Pa.'.. .0 "ac Cost, peak TAII r� FERI(WDOC El ;l --- -- - ONTE S.ddl, PS.: c. cl.,I� Pk, H100 t, . . CA I bieso -glll LF.0 .lye CA) I ()I VENTURA Coo""ry FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL �10: cl) 6 MOORPARK 0 z ZACHARY STREET 00. IPA LL W LL z too MOORPARK MAINTENANCE STATION SITE AND GRADING PLAN FIGURE 4 - F N - O rol lb Z a O P" y Z Ch I on c m N 0 0 CREW ROOM CREW ROOM CHEW ROOM u NVAC O 1� / 3 ¢ N / W O WOMEN ! LCCKE RS U � UTILITY COVE `JAN. c7 SUPERVISORS S LEAD WORKERS % I\ �� O W 'SUPERIN- // LOCKERS TENDENT. L_ 3 w S U 0 —y N { / I DATE �1 0 G a ENTRY — OFFICE FLOOR PLAN T 0 �I NERATOR I WORK \, SHOP EQUIPMENT BAYS lul UTILITY Q ROOM o a o 0 0 o n WEST ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION 8 Site Descrintion: Project Site - The new Caltrans Moorpark Maintenance Station is proposed to be located on a vacant, previously graded parcel. There are no existing structures on the site, and only minimal vegetation exists in the form of scattered scrubs and immature trees. The site is practically level, has been tilled for control of weeds, and the upper 18 to 24 inches of the soils are loose. The Arroyo Simi, which borders the project site to the east, has rip -rap on its banks, and there is no evident riparian vegetation. Previous site disturbance has also minimized the potential for the location of any cultural resources on the site. A 1951 U.S. Geological Survey map shows an orchard located on the project site. The 1969 photorevised U.S. Geological Survey map does not identify an orchard on the property, indicating that the orchard had been removed prior to 1969. The Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared for the maintenance station project identifies that abundant tree root basins loosely backfilled are expected to be present within the site. That report also identifies that irrigation lines are expected to be encountered during grading. Surrounding Land Uses - The existing surrounding land uses are as follows: North: Vacant South: Industrial East: Arroyo Simi West: Industrial The industrial property immediately north of the project site is also vacant with the railroad right -of -way located just north of that property. Existing industrial buildings are located south and west of the project site. For properties to the south, existing landscaping immediately borders the project site. For the properties to the west of the project site (both north and south of Fitch Avenue), there is no existing landscaping bordering the project site. The Arroyo Simi to the east of the project site has been channelized with rip -rap banks. II. IS THE PROPOSED PROJECT CONSISTENT WITH: Yes No N/A Moorpark General Plan X Applicable Specific Plan: X Moorpark Zoning Ordinance X III. ARE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING STUDIES REQUIRED: No Noise Study No Tree Study No Archaeological Report _No_ Biology Report 9 Yes Geotechnical /Soils Report Yes Traffic Study Yes other (Hazardous Materials /Soil Contamination Phase II Site Assessment) IV. INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST AND RESPONSES: The "Initial Study Checklist" focuses on the environmental impacts most likely to occur with project implementation and determines which impacts, if any, will be significant. Reference documents used to determine the extent to which the proposed project would affect the environment are identified in Section VI of this Initial Study and include the Moorpark General Plan, the 1992 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Update of the City's Land Use and Circulation Elements (hereinafter referred to as the 1992 General Plan Update EIR), the specific studies completed for the project, and the 1992 Caltrans approved Negative Declaration for the Moorpark Maintenance Station Relocation to the Southwest Quadrant of New Los Angeles Avenue and the Route 23 interchange. A narrative discussion follows each of the following checklist questions, and provides the factual data or evidence used to reach conclusions regarding impact significance. A. PHYSICAL. Will the proposal (either directly or indirectly): Earth 1. Appreciably change the topography or ground surface relief features? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The project site consists of fairly level topography, and the Site Plan /Grading plan included as Figure 4 verifies that only minor grading is required. Reference is also made to the Geotechnical Engineering Report for the project, which describes the topography of the project site. 2. Destroy, cover, or modify any unique geologic or physical features? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Refer to above response. 3. Result in unstable earth surfaces or increase the exposure of people or property to geologic.or seismic hazards? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No 10 The proposed project would be located in an area that is seismically active; however, the activity level can be considered normal for the Southern California region. Based on a review of the City's General Plan Safety Element, General Plan Update EIR, and Geotechnical Engineering Report for the project, no active fault passes through the limits of or in the immediate vicinity of the project site. The greatest potential for seismic activity which might affect the site is on the Simi -Santa Rosa Fault Zone located approximately one -half mile south - southeast of the site. The Simi -Santa Rosa Fault Zone is seismically active, but has had no known historic surface faulting associated with it. The potential for earthquake induced ground rupture is, therefore, considered to be negligible. The Geotechnical Engineering Report for the project also identifies that the liquefaction potential of the on -site soils is considered to be very low. 4. Result in or be affected by soil erosion or siltation (whether by water or wind)? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Construction of the proposed Moorpark Maintenance Station can be expected to actually reduce wind and water erosion and siltation both off- and on -site. The current graded condition of the project site with minimal vegetation cover would be replaced with pavement, buildings, and landscaping. Erosion during project construction would be controlled by Caltrans Contract Specifications, which would include erosion control requirements for the project. Energy and Natural Resources 5. Result in the increased use of fuel or energy in large amounts or in a wasteful manner? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The new maintenance station proposed for construction in Moorpark replaces an existing station located in the City; therefore, no measurable change in travel time would occur, and no increased use of fuel or energy would result. 6. Result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Refer to previous response and the project description. 11 7. Result in the substantial depletion of any nonrenewable resource? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Refer to previous response and the project description. 8. Violate any published Federal, State, or local standards pertaining to hazardous waste, solid waste or litter control? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The Phase II Site Assessment prepared by A.G.I. Geotechnical, Inc., for the project site did not find any evidence of existing hazardous materials contamination, and concludes that the property does not exhibit any areas of environmental concern with regard to ground water contamination from the site, soil contamination, or presence of hazardous materials. Also, that report concludes that the present potential for hazardous materials contamination from adjacent properties appears to be very low to nil. No record of any facility which manufactured or stored hazardous waste or which discharged waste onto the site was found. The Draft Project Report for the Proposed Moorpark Maintenance Station Relocation, Amendment No. 1, identifies that appurtenant building floor area is planned at the new maintenance station to include a combination cleaner room, fertilizer storage, herbicide storage, gas and oil log room, materials storage room, and hazardous material storage. Appurtenant non - building area would include material bins, a fuel island, emulsion tank, vehicle wash rack, and waste oil storage pad. The recyclable oil storage container would be constructed with a vaulted containment system in order to reduce the probability of leakage to an insignificant level. The refueling island is proposed to include storage of gas in an elevated concrete tank. The appropriate permit would be obtained from the Ventura County Environmental Health Department for the elevated gas tank. Caltrans would provide the local fire department with a business plan identifying all materials stored at the maintenance station and how to deal with them in case of an emergency. During construction, solid wastes, which may be classified as decomposable material would be removed from the construction area. These materials can include vegetation from clearing and grubbing operations as well as any solid waste illegally dumped on the property. These materials would be handled and disposed of according to contract specifications. Decomposable solid waste materials generated during construction would be placed in dump sites provided by the contractor. All dump sites must be approved by Caltrans prior to construction and must be of a suitable class compatible with the type of material being deposited. If solid waste material is to be hauled on city streets, the determination of routes to the various dump sites would require approval by both Caltrans and the City to ensure the least disruption of local traffic service and the least damage to local transportation facilities throughout the construction period. 12 Water 9. Modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The project does not require any modification to the Arroyo Simi channel. 10. Encroach upon a floodplain or result in or be affected by floodwaters or tidal waves? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The project site is located adjacent to the Arroyo Simi and is within the 100 -year floodplain. Based on The Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map for the City of Moorpark (Community -Panel Number 060712 0005 A), the project site is located within Zone B. That Zone description is as follows: Areas between limits of the 100 -year flood and 500 -year flood; or certain areas subject to 100 -year flooding with average depths less than one (1) foot or where the contributing drainage area is less than one square mile; or areas protected by levees from the base flood. The Arroyo Simi is channelized adjacent to the project site, with rip -rap banks for erosion protection. The project grading plan identifies that building pads would be raised a minimum of one foot above the 100 -year floodplain. For these reasons, no flood hazard impact would result from project construction. The existing Caltrans maintenance station on Los Angeles Avenue is also within an area designated as Zone B on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. 11. Adversely affect the quantity or quality of surface water, groundwater, or public water supply? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No A drainage plan would be approved by the City Engineer, and Caltrans prior to construction of site improvements. Site drainage would be directed towards Fitch Avenue and Zachary Street, and would be designed in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System requirements. The Arroyo Simi would not be impacted by project site drainage based on planned maintenance station infrastructure improvements and the existing flood control improvements which include a sloped bank and maintenance road that separates the project site from the flood control channel. The Geotechnical Engineering Report identifies that groundwater was encountered in the exploratory borings at a depth of about 33 1/2 feet below existing ground surface. The Geotechnical Engineering Report also identified the existence of a water well on the adjacent parcel to the north, which would not be affected by the proposed project. No impact to groundwater quantity or quality is expected. The project is the relocation of an existing maintenance station; therefore, no impact to the public water supply would result. 13 12. Result in the use of water in large amounts or in a wasteful manner? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Water would be used in accordance with Caltrans maintenance station requirements. 13. Violate or be inconsistent with Federal, State or local water quality standards? Yes Maybe No Significant? Refer to Response No. 11, above. Air X No 14. Result in changes in air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any climatic conditions? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Based on an analysis by Caltrans, the maintenance station's daily activities would not exceed the one hour nor the eight hour state and federal carbon monoxide (CO) air quality standards, since the facility would be generating a very limited number of vehicle trips (about 150 vehicle trips per day). City Community Development Department staff also analyzed the project based on the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District 1989 Guidelines for the Preparation of Air Quality Impact Analyses. Included within the Guidelines are the criteria adopted by the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Board for determining the significance of air quality impacts. The only applicable criterion for the proposed project was determined to be the limitation on the emission of reactive organic compounds (ROC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) for the ozone nonattainment area of the County outside of the Ojai Valley and Ventura 1 Nongrowth area. Based on the Guidelines, general development projects located in the City of Moorpark that will emit 25 pounds or more per day of either ROC or NOx, will be considered as individually and cumulatively having a significant adverse impact on air quality. The emission rate tables in Appendices B and C of the Guidelines were used to estimate emissions. Emissions for ROC and NOx were estimated by multiplying the respective emission rates for the proposed land use by the development area (i.e., square footage). The analysis year was determined to be 1994, and the land use category was determined to be No. 130, Industrial Park. The ROC emissions were calculated to be 1.11 pounds per day and Nox emissions were calculated to be 1.58 pounds per day. The conclusion is that no individual or cumulative air quality impact would result from the project, since daily emissions would not exceed 25 pounds. 15. 16. 17. 14 The Federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 require that the states prepare an implementation plan (SIP) to attain and maintain the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. For transportation related air pollution, the California Plan contains transportation control measures to reduce emissions. All transportation plans, programs, and projects must be consistent with the measures set forth in the SIP. On November 3, 1987, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion vacating and ordering disapproval of the Environmental Protection Agency's previous approval of ozone and CO control measures for the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). The SIP for ozone and CO for SCAB was disapproved by EPA on January 22, 1988, whereupon the 1979 SIP became the applicable SIP. The 1989 Air Quality Management Plan has been proposed as a SIP revision, but has not been approved by EPA. The Moorpark maintenance station project is included in SCAG's Regional Transportation Plan (1989 Regional Mobility Plan) and the 1991 -97 Transportation Improvement Program that FBWA determined to be in conformance with the SIP on November 14, 1991. The design concept and scope of the project have not changed significantly from that which is included in the 1989 Regional Mobility Plan and the Transportation Improvement Program. Analysis by Caltrans and the City verifies that the project would not increase the violations of the CO and ozone (ROC and NOx) standards in the area substantially affected by the project. Therefore, the new maintenance station project is in conformity with the SIP. Result in an increase in air pollutant emissions resulting in adverse effects on or deterioration of ambient air quality? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Refer to Response No. 14, above. Result in the creation of objectionable odors? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No No odor related impacts are expected based on the site location and maintenance station functions. Chemicals would be stored in buildings on the site. Violate or be inconsistent with Federal, State, or local air standards or control plans? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Refer to Response No. 14, above. B. 15 Noise 18. Result in an increase in noise levels or vibration for adjoining areas? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Based on the City's Noise Element Community Noise Equivalent Level Contour Maps, the existing and projected noise levels for the project site would be between 60 and 70 decibels. The existing noise sources that affect the project site are predominantly the State Route 23 bridges to the east and the railroad activity to the north. Noise levels up to 75 decibels are generally considered acceptable for industrial land uses; and Caltrans maintenance station operations would not result in noise level impacts to adjacent industrial land uses based on local, state, and federal land use compatibility standards. 19. Result in any Federal, State, or local noise criteria being equal or exceeded? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Refer to Response No. 18, above. Light and Glare 20. Produce new light, glare, or shadows? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The proposed project would introduce new light sources, since the project site is currently undeveloped. Consistent with City of Moorpark requirements, Caltrans would design all exterior lights so as to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties. Exterior lights would be fully hooded and back shielded to reduce light spillage and glare. The direct light source would not be visible. BIOLOGICAL. Will the proposal result in (either directly or indirectly): Plant Life 1. Change in the diversity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora, and aquatic plants) ? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No City Community Development Department staff conducted a field investigation and reviewed the California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Data Base and the City's 1992 General Plan Update EIR. The project site does not contain any sensitive plant 2. KF 4. 16 species, and there is no recorded evidence of sensitive species based on referenced documents and available data. Past grading of the project site has greatly diminished the biological value of the property. Reduction of the numbers of or encroachment upon the critical habitat of any unique, threatened or endangered species of plants? Yes Refer to Response No. 1, above. Maybe No Significant? X No Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or result in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The project site is isolated by the existing industrial development to the west and south, the railroad right -of -way to the north, and the rip -rap banks of the Arroyo Simi channel to the east. The landscaping proposed for the project site is consistent with the adjacent industrial properties. Riparian tree species would be included in the landscaping along the easterly site boundary adjacent to the Arroyo Simi. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop or commercial timber stand, or affect prime, unique, or other farmland of State or local importance? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The project site does not contain agricultural land as defined by the Soil Conservation Service as being of prime, unique or Statewide importance. Animal Life 5. Removal or deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The project site contains very disturbed habitat for wildlife, as discussed in Response No. 1 (Plant Life), above, and no sensitive biological resources are present. The California Natural Diversity Data Base does identify the Arroyo Simi between Campus Park Drive and Moorpark Road (actually Spring Road) as potential habitat area for the Least Bell's vireo. A field inspection by City Community Development Department staff confirmed that there is no riparian vegetation along the Arroyo Simi in the vicinity of the project site due to the flood control improvements which include rip -rap along the channel banks. Based on prior site disturbance, the project would not result in a significant wildlife habitat impact; however, the project is subject to the user fee provided by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4. Such fee would be paid by the City at the time of filing of the Notice of Determination. 17 6. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Refer to Response No. 5, above. 7. Reduction of the numbers of or encroachment upon the critical habitat of any unique, threatened or endangered species of animals? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Refer to Response No. 5, above. 8. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration of movement of animals? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Refer to project description and Response No. 3 (Plant Life). C. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC. Will the proposal (directly or indirectly): Land Use 1. Cause disruption of orderly planned development? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The City is working cooperatively with Caltrans to locate the new maintenance station at the proposed project site. The maintenance station is considered consistent with uses allowed in the M -1 Zone district and is also consistent with the I -1 General Plan designation. 2. Be inconsistent with any elements of adopted General plan, policies or goals, or the California Urban Strategy? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The City has worked cooperatively with Caltrans to locate a mutually acceptable site for the new maintenance station. The California Urban Strategy was reviewed, and the City's Community Development Department's determination is that the proposed project at the Fitch Avenue site would not be in conflict. 18 3. Be inconsistent with a Coastal Zone Management Plan? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The City of Moorpark is not located within the Coastal Zone. 4. Support large commercial or residential development? Yes Maybe No Significant? % No The proposed maintenance station would not have any effect on commercial or residential development. Population 5. Affect the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Refer to project description. 6. Affect minority, elderly, handicapped, transit- dependent, or other specific interest groups? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Refer to project description. Neighborhood /Community 7. Affect life- styles, or neighborhood character or stability? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The project site is within an industrial park, and there would be no impact to a neighborhood or community. S. Divide or disrupt an established community? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Refer to Response No. 7, above. 19 9. Affect any community facilities (including medical, educational, scientific, recreational, or religious institutions, ceremonial sites or sacred shrines)? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No City Community Development Department staff have reviewed existing community facilities and have determined that the project would not affect such facilities. Housing 10. Affect existing housing, require the acquisition of residential improvements or the displacement of people or create a demand for additional housing? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No There are no housing units on or in the immediate vicinity of the project site. Economic 11. Affect employment, industry or commerce, or require the displacement of businesses or farms? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Since the project is the replacement of an existing maintenance station already located within the City, no employment impact would result. The project site is vacant; therefore, no displacement impact would occur. 12. Affect property values or the local tax base? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The overall impact on property values and the local tax base is expected to be positive, based on the location of the new station at the Fitch Avenue site. The existing maintenance station is located in a Commercial Planned Development Zone district on Los Angeles Avenue, and is within the Moorpark Redevelopment Area. Sale of that commercial zoned property would result in an increased tax assessment, and would most likely provide the City with sales tax revenues when developed in accordance with an allowed commercial land use. 20 Public utilities and Services 13. Affect public utilities, or police, fire, emergency or other public services? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Water and sewer service is available to the project site, and connections can be made to existing facilities in both Fitch Avenue and Zachary Street. The City does not anticipate any impact to police services, and the Ventura County Fire Protection District would need to sign off on the site development plans, including proposed fire flow, prior to initiation of construction. Transportation /Circulation 14. Have substantial impact on existing transportation systems or alter present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Austin -Foust Associates, Inc., completed a Traffic Analysis Report for the project. The analysis was performed at the request of the City in order to provide a general understanding of the maintenance station's vehicle traffic impacts, in the morning and evening peak hours, at key intersection locations surrounding the proposed relocation site. The maintenance station's traffic impacts were examined in a time frame that took into consideration projected development plans within the project vicinity plus ambient growth due to other development that is expected to occur in surrounding areas over the next three to five years. This traffic forecast setting, referred to as 1996 conditions in the Traffic Analysis Report, was established based on traffic growth and travel pattern projections from the City's traffic forecasting model. Trip generation estimates for the maintenance station were provided by Caltrans and are summarized in the Traffic Analysis Report. Project traffic generation estimates wee distributed onto the roadway system based on distribution patterns that were derived from the City's traffic forecasting model. Peak hour intersection volumes produced by the maintenance station were then added to the 1996 background volumes, and the resulting 1996 "with project" peak hour interchange capacity utilization (ICU) values were calculated. Peak hour turn volume count data was obtained by Traffic Counts, Inc., on November 10, 1993, at the Flinn Avenue /Spring Road intersection. The following table summarizes AM and PM peak hour intersection capacity utilization (ICU) values for 1996 background conditions without the proposed maintenance station and with the proposed maintenance station: 1996 BACKGROUND INTERSECTION 1996 BACKGROUND PLUS PROJECT AM PM AM PM .37 .49 Spring & High Los Angeles .37 .49 Spring & Flinn .28 .29 .29 .31 Spring & New Los Angeles .63 .90 .63 .90 Science & New Los Angeles .62 .69 .63 .69 21 As the information in the preceding table indicates, traffic generated by the maintenance station is anticipated to have very little measurable impact on the roadway system in the vicinity of the project site under short -range (1996) conditions. As part of the short -range conditions evaluation, a peak hour traffic signal warrant analysis was carried out based on 1996 plus project volumes at the intersection of Spring Road and Flinn Avenue. The results are illustrated in the Traffic Analysis Report, and verify that installation of a traffic signal at that location is not expected to be warranted with development of CaltransI proposed maintenance station. 15. Generate substantial additional traffic? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Refer to Response No. 14, above. 16. Result in alterations to water borne, rail or air traffic? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Refer to project description. Parkin4 17. Affect or be affected by existing parking facilities or result in demand of new parking? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The project site plan includes adequate on -site parking spaces to meet the needs of employees and visitors. Risk of Upset and Human Health 18. Involve a substantial risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident or otherwise adversely affect overall public safety? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Any hazardous materials would be stored in accordance with State and local requirements. Refer to Response No. A.8 for further discussion. 22 Archaeolocrical /Historical 19. Affect a significant archaeological or historic site, structure, object, or building? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No A field survey of the project site by City Community Development Department staff documented that the project site is highly disturbed from prior grading activities. Based on the City's General Plan Update EIR (1992), there are no recorded historic landmarks or archaeological resources located on, or in the vicinity of, the project site. The UCLA Institute of Archaeology conducted the archaeological records search for the General Plan Update EIR project area (which included the entire City limits) in October 1990. That document search included a review of all recorded historic and prehistoric archaeological sites as well as a review of all known cultural resource survey and excavation reports. The cultural resources analysis in the General Plan Update EIR also included a review of all listed historical landmarks as well as Moorpark Historical Society records. Aesthetics 20. Affect wild or scenic rivers or natural landmarks? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No There is no wild or scenic river or natural landmarks located in the vicinity of the project site. 21. Affect any scenic resources or result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The proposed project site is located within a developed industrial park, and no public view impact is expected. The maintenance station facility would be viewed by some industrial park employees and visitors and by railroad users (including Metrolink and Amtrak users). Landscaping is proposed along the perimeter of the site for screening purposes. Landscaping along the easterly side of the site, adjacent to the Arroyo Simi, is proposed to include riparian tree species. The City's long -term plans for the Arroyo Simi include the provision of a trail (based on the City's Circulation Element), which would most likely be constructed along an existing flood control maintenance road at the top of the embankment. The Caltrans landscaping along the easterly site boundary would improve the aesthetic experience for any persons using such a trail in the future. Past flood control improvements removed all of the native species along the banks of the Arroyo Simi adjacent to the project site. 23 Construction Activities 22. Result in substantial impacts associated with construction activities (e.g., noise, dust, temporary drainage, traffic detours and temporary access, etc.)? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No The discussion pertaining to proper disposal of solid waste materials generated during construction is included in Response No. A. 8. Construction of the project may require use of equipment which has high noise characteristics. Typically, the equipment ranges from concrete mixers to jackhammers producing noise levels in the 80 -90 decibel range at a distance of 50 feet. To reduce the impact of construction noise, construction activities would be confined to the daily period least disturbing to the neighboring community, which is between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Other noise control measures to be considered by Caltrans in the use of construction equipment are as follows: A. The noisiest operations would be arranged together in the construction program to avoid continuing periods of greater annoyance. B. Equipment would be installed and maintained with effective muffler exhaust systems. In accordance with Ventura County Air Pollution Control District requirements, fugitive dust emissions produced during clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations would be suppressed using the following procedures: A. All material excavated or graded should be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering should occur at least twice daily with complete coverage, preferably in the late morning and after work is done for the day. B. All clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation activities should cease during periods of high winds (greater than 20 mph averaged over one hour) so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. C. All material transported off -site should be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. D. Face masks should be used by or excavation operations inhalation of dust which ma y San Joaquin Valley Fever. all employees involved in grading during dry periods to reduce contain the fungus which causes E. The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations should be minimized so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. 24 After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations, and during construction activities, fugitive dust emissions should be controlled using the following procedures: A. All inactive portions of the construction site should be seeded and watered until grass cover is grown. B. All active portions of the construction site should be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. At all times, fugitive dust emissions should be controlled using the following procedures: A. On -site vehicle speed should be limited to 15 miles per hour. B. All areas with vehicle traffic should be watered periodically. C. Use of petroleum -based dust palliatives shall meet the road oil requirements of Ventura County APCD Rule 74.4, Cutback Asphalt. D. Streets adjacent to the project site should be swept as needed to remove silt which may have accumulated from construction activities so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Park /Recreation 23. Result in the use of any publicly -owned land from a park, recreation area, or wildlife and waterfowl refuge? Yes Maybe No Significant? X No Refer to project description and environmental setting. D. Mandatory Findings of Significance 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Yes No X Refer to previous Responses. 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long -term impacts will endure well into the future.) Yes No X Refer to previous Responses. 25 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. The term "cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Yes No X Refer to previous Responses. 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Yes No X Refer to previous Responses. V. CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION: This Initial Study was prepared by the City of Moorpark in cooperation with Caltrans. During the public circulation of this document, interested agencies and individuals will have the opportunity to comment and /or request a public hearing. VI. REFERENCES: The references used in responding to this questionnaire include the following: 1. A.G.I. Geotechnical, Inc.; Geotechnical Engineerina Report, Proposed Caltrans Maintenance Yard, Fitch Site Fremont Tract Parcels 1 & 2 Fitch Avenue and Zachary Street, Moorpark California; December 16, 1993. 2. A.G.I. Geotechnical, Inc.;Phase II Site Assessment, Proposed Caltrans Maintenance Yard, Fitch Site Fremont Tract Parcels 1 & 2 Fitch Avenue and Zachary Street Moorpark California; December 16, 1993. 3. Austin -Foust Associates, Inc.; Caltrans Maintenance Station Traffic Analysis, November 24, 1993. 4. California Department of Transportation; Negative Declaration and Initial Studv, Relocate Existing Moorpark Maintenance Station to Excess Right -of -Way at the New Los Angeles Avenue and Route 23 Freewav Interchange, Ventura County California; 1992. 5. California Department of Transportation; Draft Amendment #1 Project Report for the Proposed Moorpark Maintenance Station Relocation; 1993. 26 6. City of Moorpark, EIR for Moorpark Land Use and Circulation Element Update and Sphere of Influence Expansion Study, 1992. 7. City of Moorpark, General Plan of the City of Moorpark (includes Land Use; Circulation; Housing; Noise; Open Space, Conservation, and Recreation; and Safety). 8. City of Moorpark, Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No 137). 9. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Number 060712 0005 A, September 29, 1986 and revision dated August 24, 1990. 10. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, Fifth Edition. 11. U.S.G.S. Topographic Quadrangle Maps for Moorpark. 12. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, Guidelines for the Preparation of Air Quality Impact Analyses, 1989. 13. Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, Ventura County Air Quality Management Plan, 1991. VII. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. - 27 -`Iy Date Date I find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures, described in this initial study, could be applied to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION should be prepared. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ADDENDUM to an existing certified ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Senior Planner J'dhC R. Aguilera, Director of Community Development VIII. DISTRIBUTION LIST FOR DRAFT NEGATIVE State Officials and Agencies California Department of Fish and Game 245 W. Broadway, Suite 350 Long Beach, CA 90802 Frank Bergen (3 Copies) Caltrans District 7 Environmental Planning Branch 120 South Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Dave Servaes Caltrans District 7 Maintenance 157 South Garden St. Ventura, CA 93001 California Highway Patrol Attn: Lt. Lemond 4656 Valentine Road Ventura, CA 93003 State Clearinghouse (10 copies) Governor's Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Regional & Local Agencies County of Ventura Keith Turner Planning Director County of Ventura 800 S. Victoria Avenue Ventura, CA 93009 Ventura County Flood Control 800 S. Victoria Avenue Ventura, CA 93009 Ventura County Public Works Dept. Maintenance 800 S. Victoria Avenue Ventura, CA 93009 Ventura County Waterworks District 1 7150 Walnut Canyon Moorpark, CA 93021 East Valley Sheriff's Dept. Attn. Lt. Dean 2101 Olson Road Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Ventura County Fire Protection Ag. Attn. Shonna Perry 165 Durley Avenue Camarillo, CA 93010 -8586 27 Organizations Moorpark Chamber of Commerce P. O. Box 296 Moorpark, CA 93021 Moorpark Library 699 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Environmental Coalition Moorpark Branch P. O. Box 378 Moorpark, CA 93020 Other Lloyd R. Laycook Simi Moorpark Properties, Ltd. 2800 28th Street, Ste. 200 Santa Monica, CA 90405 W. F. Poleri 6863 Trojan Ct. Moorpark, CA 93021 A. W. Simen 726 Nogales Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 28 IX. COMMENT LETTERS RECEIVED ON DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION Comment letters on the Draft Negative Declaration were received from Caltrans District 7, Advance Planning and Environmental Planning Branches. Those two letters and responses to the comments in those letters follow this page. State of California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency 29 Memorandum To , Mr. Mark Goss State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 Wilford Melton — District 7 From : DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Subject: Project Review Comments = No.93t2 19_ Date : January 20, 1994 File No.: IGR /CEQA /NEG DEC City of Moorpark CALTRANS MAINTENANCE STATION IPD -93 -2/ LLA -93 -11 Vic. VEN- 118- R18.15 VEN- 23- T11.46 Caltrans has reviewed the above - referenced document. Based on the information received, we find no significant impact on the State Transportation System at this time. However, any transport of heavy construction equipment which requires the use of oversize transport vehicles on State Freeways/ Highways will require a Caltrans transportation permit. We re- commend that large size trucks that are transporting construction materials, equipment or excess excavated material be limited to off -peak commute periods. If you have any questions regarding this response, please call me at (213) 897 -1338. cc: Deborah S. Traffenstedt ✓ City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 priginM Signed BY WILFORD MELTON Senior Transportation Planner IGR /CEQA Coordinator Advance Planning Branch nh \1001 RICEEEEEEEE�ED 1�1 JAN 2 41994 City of Moorpark Community Development Departm RESPONSE TO: Letter from Caltrans District 7, Advance Planning Branch 1. Comment noted. Caltrans will be responsible for the actual construction of the maintenance station facility and will require permits and place restrictions on construction vehicles as is appropriate. ..... JAN- 25 -'00 TUE 12:55 ID: TEL NO: 4008 P02 7TAT7 OF CAUF01W M- VA*4W AM UAWMATICN AQNCY PM WILICH, f70r— DEPARTMOW OF TRANSPORTATION 1N "Wr F. In4o. moo R. January 25, 1994 Mr. Jaime R. Ayuilera Director of Community Development City Of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 Dear Mr. Aguileras Caltrans has reviewed the C$ty's proposed Negative Declaration for relocation of our, Maintenance Station to a Parcel east of the intersection of Minor street and Fitch Avenue, in the City of Moorpark. We believe the Initial study adequately addresses the environmental issues and that a Negative Declaration is the appropriate CNRA document for the proposed relocation of the Maintenance- facility. One concern we have regarding the parcel is that it lien within the 100 -year floodplain. 'The plan to raise building pads a minimum of one foot above the 100 -year floodplain will not 1 assure access to the site if adjacent roads are flooded during such a storm. Caltrans is concer,nned about such a risk, and its potential impacts upon emergency paintenance operations during periods of flooding. In Section IV.A.14, it is stated that "The facility would be generating a very limited number'of vehicle trips (about 150 Z person trips per day)." This should read "about 150 vehicle trips per day," if you are using data developed for Caltrans' 1992 Negative Declaration for thel Maintenance facility relocation.. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any question*., please contact Frank Aergen at (213) 897-3848. Sincerely, ? RO D J. K SINS Chie Lnviro 1 Plann arch •i SfNJ 25 '94 12:53 CEO RESPONSE TO: Letter from Caltrans District 7, Environmental Planning Branch 1. Comment noted. 2. The recommended text correction has been made. MAPS FOR SUBJECT SITE WILL BE PROVIDED ON MONDAY AFTERNOON MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss. CITY OF MOORPARK ) I, Lillian E. Hare, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 94 -1011 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on the 2nd day of FEBRUARY , 1994, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS HUNTER, MONTGOMERY, PEREZ AND MAYOR LAWRASON NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER WOZNIAK ABSTAIN: NONE WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 4th day of FEBRUARY 1994. Lillian E. Hare City Clerk PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. PATRICK HUNTER SCOTT MONTGOMERY BERNARDO M. PEREZ JOHN E. WOZNIAK Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember Councilmember Concilmember Printed on Recycled Paper