Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES CC 1997 1358 1997 0716RESOLUTION NO. 97 -1358 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA DENYING COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 96 -2 MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 WITHOUT PREJUDICE (SAN PEDRO SIGNS) WHEREAS, on December 18, 1996, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96 -1258 approving Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 96 -2; and WHEREAS, on May 22, 1997, the applicant applied for Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 96 -2 Minor Modification No. 1 for approval of a sign program; and WHEREAS, staff conduced an environmental review of the proposed application and determined that the project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act requirements as a Class 1 exemption for the minor alteration of private structures. WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development recommended denial of Commercial Planned Development Permit No. 96 -2 Minor Modification No. 1 on June 30, 1997; and WHEREAS, the City Council after review and consideration of the information contained in the Staff Report and testimony which was received at the July 16, 1997 meeting reached a decision on this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby denies Commercial Planned Development No. 96 -2 Minor Modification No. 1 without prejudice based on the findings set forth in section 2 and on information in the Staff Report dated June 30, 1997, which report in incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth: Pd9 6 - 2 # 1 ti ()011.7 . Resolution 97- San Pedro Signs Page 2 SECTION 2. The City Council adopts the following findings: 1. The Minor Modification is not consistent with the intent and provisions of the City's General Plan and of the City Ordinance Code; 2. The Minor Modification is not compatible with the character of surrounding development; 3. The proposed Minor Modification would be obnoxious or harmful, or impair the utility of neighboring property or uses; 4. The Permit would be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare; and 5. The conditionally permitted use is not compatible with existing and planned land uses in the general area where the development is to be located. 6. The proposed project will have a substantial adverse impact on surrounding properties. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 16 DAY OF 1996. ATTEST: Patric Hunter, Mayor illian E. Hare, City Clerk Pd96 -2 #1 MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS. CITY OF MOORPARK ) I, Lillian E. Hare, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 97- 1358 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on the 16th day of JULY 1997, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS EVANS, PEREZ, RODGERS TEASLEY, WOZNIAK AND MAYOR HUNTER NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 17th day of JULY , , 1997. eAï¿œu Lillian E. Hare, CMC City Clerk PATRICK HUNTER BERNARDO M. PEREZ CHRISTOPHER EVANS DEBBIE RODGERS TEASLEY JOHN E. WOZNIAK Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember