Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 1986 0122 PC REGJAMES D. WEAK Mayor /r_"­iOMAS C. FERGUSON Mayor Pro Tem ALBERT PRIETO Councilmember DANNY A. WOOLARD Councilmember LETA YANCY- SUTTON Councilmember DORIS D. BANKUS City Clerk THOMAS P.GENOVESE City Treasurer MOORPARK A G E N D A PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, January 22, 1986 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS - 3 minutes per speaker 5. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Conditional Use Permit No. CUP -450 STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYLJ.KANE City Attorney RICHARD MORTON Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police tion & Applicant is requesting approval of conditional use permit to drill one (1) exploratory oil well. Located 6,000 feet southwest of the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and College View Avenue. Approval of Resolution No. PC -86 -74 B. General Plan ZC -2802 & ZC Nos. General Plan Amendment 85 -2 is comprised of two components; the first is a request for a land use change from Light Industrial to General Commercial (Caren) and the second is a request for the conversion of property designated for residential to light industrial uses (Carlsberg). The applicants are also requesting companion zone changes to rezone the properties consistent with the proposed land use designations. An Environmental Impact Report which addresses the potential project - specific and cumulative environmental impacts of both components was prepared and reviewed. Approval of Resolution No. PC -86 -75 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529.6874 Agenda - Planning Commission p. 2 - January 22, 1986 5. CONSENT CALENDAR continued...... C. Zone Change No. ZC -2807, Vesting Tentative Tract No. TR -414 & Residential Planned Development Permit No. RPD -1052 The applicant is requesting approval of the following: 1) Zone Change No. 2807 to rezone a 56.19 acre parcel from the "PC" (Planned Community) to the "RPD- 3.65U" (Residential Planned Development 3.65 Units to the Acre) Zone: 2) Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.4140 to subdivide a 56.19 acre site into 205 lots (203 homesites, 2 recreation lots) and; 3) Residential Planned Development Permit No. 1052 to construct 203 single family homes and two neighborhood recreation complexes. Approval of Resolution No. PC -86 -76 No. TR -4141 vvawuuuiLies � . t is requesting approval of the following: 1) Zone Change No. 2808 to rezone a 54.3 acre parcel from the "PC" (Planned Community) to the "RPD -5U" (Residential Planned Development 5 Units to the Acre) Zone; 2) Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4141 to subdivide a 54.3 site into 234 lots (231 homesites, 2 recreation lots and one park site, South Village Park) and; 3) Residential Planned Development Permit No. 1053 to construct 231 single family+ homes and two neighborhood recreation complexes. Approval of Resolution No. PC -86 -77 5. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR continued...... Agenda - Planning Commission p. 3 - January 22, 1986 The applicant is requesting approval of the following: 1) Zone Change No.2809 to rezone a 128.8 acre parcel from the "PC" (Planned Community) to the "RPD -2.2U" (Residential Planned Development 2.2 Units to the Acre) Zone; 2j' Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 4142 to subdivide a 151.5 acre site into 286 lots (283 homesites, 2 recreation lots and a lot reserved for future high density residential development) and; 3) Residential Planned Development Permit No. 1054 to construct 283 single family homes and two neighborhood recreation complexes. Approval of Resolution No. PC -86 -78 PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Development Plan Permit Nos. DP -320, DP -321, DP -322 (F.E. Financial) Continued to February 12, 1986. The applicant is requesting approval to construct an industrial facility - 4 structures containing; a) 20,720; b) 13,780; c) 10,736; d) 20,720 square feet. The proposed project is located on Commerce 400 feet south of Poindexter Avenue. B. Development Plan Permit Nos. DP -32 DP -329. DP -330 & DP -331 ( Poindexte The applicant is requesting approval to construct an industrial facility - 6 structures containing; a) 8,869; b) 8,960; c) 8,960; d) 9,404; e) 17,204; f) 20,800 square feet. The proposed project is located south of Poindexter - between Gabbert and Shasta. C. Amendment No. A -85 -3 amendment to the Zoning Ordiance ' Changes to industrial setback requirements (Article 23) and to parking and loading and unloading space require- ments. Agenda - Planning Commission p. 4 - January 22, 1986 7. COMMISSION ACTION ITEMS A. Decision Making Resolutions B. Goals & Programs for 1986 - Chairman LaPerch letter C. Tentative Tract No. TR- 3070 -3 - Fencing 8. COMMISSION COMMENTS 9. STAFF COMMENTS 10. ADJOURNMENT r"` MOORPA ?. K tliated 68 JAMES D WEAK STEVEN KUENY Mayor City Manager THOMAS C. FERGUSON .fierfc." /04 CHERYL J. KANE Mayor Pro Tern 44pme City Attorney ALBERT PRIETO glo 01440RICHARD MORTON Councilmember w.A Director of DANNY A. WOOLARD / . Community Councilmember Development LETA YANCY-SUTTON R. DENNIS DELZEIT Councilmember City Engineer DORIS D. BANKUS JOHN V. GILLESPIE City Clerk Chief of Police THOMAS P. GENOVESE City Treasurer DATE: January 22, 1986 SUBJECT: Development Plan Permit No. DP-326 - 331 APPLICANT: Poindexter Associates 9010 Corbin Northridge, CA. 91324 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to construct an industrial facility - 6 structures containing; a) 8, 869; b) 8, 960; c) 8,960;c) 20, 800; d) 9, 404; e) 17,204; square feet; no specific tenant has been identified. STAFF TESTIMONY AND PROPOSED FINDINGS: 1. Location and Parcel Number: The proposed project is located south of Poindexter - between Gabbert and Shasta. The site is rectangular in -shape. Assessor Parcel No. 511-07-32. 2. Description of Request: The applicant is requesting approval to construct 6 small industrial facilities. The site contains 4. 19 acres which will be developed with six low profile structures. Access to the site is from Poindexter for building "1" and Tech Circle for buildings "2" through "6" . Building "1" totals 8, 869 square feet containing 1, 790 square feet of office. Building "2" totals 8, 960 square feet containing 3, 956 square feet of office. Building "3" totals 8;960 square feet containing 3, 956 square feet of office: Building "4" totals 9, 404 square feet containing 6, 000 square feet of office. Building "5" totals 20, 800 square feet. Building "6" totals 17, 240 square feet. The applicant is also requesting waiver of interior yard require- ments for building "1" , "2" , "3" & "4" (zero lot line) . 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,California 93021 (805)529-6874 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP-326 - 331 (Poindexter Associates) Pursuant to Section 8141-4. 12, the Planning Director shall be authorized to modify or entirely waive these interior yard requirements as appropriate in cases where such reductions for efficient utilization of property, if such modification or waiver will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare and that the subject property is within a previously approved industrial subdivision in the "M" Zone for which a written and detailed plan for the development of the entire subdivision has been filed with the Planning Director for review prior to the issuance of any permits for development of any subdivision lots. Under a previously recorded Parcel Map 3215, the proposed project meets such requirements, thus staff feels such a request is warranted based upon the criteria outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. Parking as indicated on the site plan is sufficient for the proposed project. The architecture of the building is a low- profile (Buildings "1" - "4") will have a maximum height of 22 ' while buildings "5" & "6" will have a maximum height of 28 ' . Building "1" - "6" will be constructed of alternating bands of smooth and split-face concrete block. In addition, store front glazing will be detailed in black anodized aluminum and spandrel glass will be utilized over portions of the exterior. Access to the rear of each building will be provided by either roll-up doors or passage door. Although this development will be constructed in phases, the developer is conditioned to construct curb and gutter and street improvements upon first phase. The parcel has a recorded (Parcel Map No. PM-3215) which delineates lot lines of recordation. 3. Existing Land Use: The subject site is vacant. No specific tenant has been identified. 4. Adjacent Land Use: North: Railroad - Vacant South: Vacant (field) East: Mini-Storage West: Industrial (existing building) ; Therefore, as condition, the proposed project would be compatible with adjacent land uses; 5. Existing Natural Features : The subject site is flat and unimproved. Therefore, as conditioned, the subject site would be physically suitable for the type of land use being proposed; DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP-326 - 331 6. Zoning: Existing zoning for the project sit is "M-1" . As conditioned, the project would be compatible with existing zoning; 7. General Plan: The Land use Element of the Moorpark General Plan designates the site as "I-1" (Light Industrial) . The project, as proposed is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs of the General Plan; 8, Adjacent Zoning and General Plan: Zoning General Plan North: "A-E" (Agricultural Exclusive) AG-1 (10 - 40 Acres/DU South: "M-1" (Industrial) I-1 (Light Industrial) East: "M-1" (Industrial) I-1 (Light Industrial) West: "M-2" (Limited Industrial) 1-2 (Medium Industrial) Therefore, as conditioned, this project would be compatible with the uses permitted by adjacent zoning and the General Plan designations; 9. Services: a) Water and Sanitation: The Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 has indicated that adequate service can be provided at this time. However, the District is in the process of studying the next expansion to the plant in order to serve all approved and proposed projects. Therefore, with appropriate conditioning, there are adequate water and sanitation services for the project. b) Police and Fire Protection: According to responses submitted by the Police and Fire Departments, this project would not have a significant effect on law enforcement or fire protection services; Therefore, with appropriate conditioning, there are adequate provisions for police and fire services; 10. Traffic Circulation: Access to the site would be from Poindexter and Tech Circle. The applicant under Parcel Map 3215 on which the proposed project is located had previously bonded toward the Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution and therefore DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP-326 - 331 10. Traffic Circulation: continued no such mitigation measures are necessary for the proposed project. Therefore, as conditioned, there will be adequate provisions for access to the project site; 11 . Environmental Review: Since no specific use has been proposed for this building, potential use related impacts (re use of hazardous materials) have not been evaluated as part of this review. This review pertains only to the construction of the building and associated impacts. Based upon an initial review, the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared (Exhibit "3") . The public review was from November 26, 1985 to December 17, 1985; no comments have been received. 12 . Public Comments : To date, the Department of Community Development has received no public comments regarding this project; 13. Development Advisory Committee: On January 7, 1985, the applicant' s representative met with city staff to review the recommended conditions of approval. The applicant expressed agreement with all the proposed conditions of approval. 14 . Ordinance Compliance: Based upon the information and findings set forth above, it is determined that this application with the attached conditions meets the requirements of Moorpark Ordinance Code Section 8163-3, in that: a) The proposed uses would be consistent with the purpose, intent, guidelines, standards, policies and provisions of the General Plan; b) The proposed uses would not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which they are located; c) The proposed uses would be compatible with land uses permitted within the General Plan land designations and the zones in the general area where the uses are to be located; d) The proposed uses would not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of the property itself or neighboring property or uses; and DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP-326 - 331 14. Ordinance Compliance: continued e) The proposed uses would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare. RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Find that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and that this body has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration and approves the attached Negative Declaration as having been completed in compliance with State CEQA Guidelines issued thereunder; and 2. Adopt the proposed findings and approve DP-326 - 331, subject to the attached conditions. The decision of your Commission is final unless appealed to the City Council within fifteen (15) calendar days. Prepared by; Diane Eaton, Associate Planner Exhibits: 1 Staff Report 2 Location Map 3 Plot Plan 4 Elevation 5 Negative Declaration . ' 0 I 1 1 1 ,...... . .....„. mooRD A RK ..<_ 1PARK . 3 r • -ift. 1 ....I L..Y 31132 1 6 5,1• .4.•••=•••• .4••••• •=.. •••=• •=‘, . ••••••••• • = ••=1•••=o mammommom. •• ••••1. Mwm•••mmimi 0 •••••• • •••• ••if,I 43 i 1 T2 N :-1--- s t ..., ....,i..... I A- 1 I 00° 1 i' I I I I_ _o__ OF' .zr, 1 1 600.1 - \\ cci .c., o r‘•0 * / \1ft'1 — —At Garr I 1 RC). I ...... 000 / CASE RD il. I o ,,,,, 4...•>' ' AI % DEVELOPMENT 1 1 i adoompimag. g EVERETT ST PLAN PERMIT 0°°I 1 .< NOS. 326 thru 331 . 1 PARK coali dil a; F.S. % ME #15 us! z . AR a i •-- IA .i>--.. I HI . < •• I` El P° '4 < SP T CO 1 I - . ,0 , ...AK* pi U ir Li\ 01NDEXTER — 1ST ST • DOR01 > DIA 81.10 AV midi I AV <>' p_ RUTH ___.1.-- -- --k- PO‘t4°€.1:Ct. < 1 ILJ PALOMAR AV 17-, CC 2ND ia vi (..) , ASSEN1 A I ST cc > 1 Z.:\4 i'l u., > I ! ______li__.—.1_..____pe Li"..,, 0...1.,.1...s_l Bit ST SARAH —. — MIND _ ...÷4. ....._ 41••• . .. ri - t-,- .,..- T <LASSEN cc 0 TEJEDA AV< I.- ;'g Ay tfirc IJJ 0 0:13 • I ' i p:- I-el—•1.2 za ,.1 a ,... 0 ROBERT C13 .a re -C & -"c ESTHER 1 .., I ZatREST" 30.-. 2 3 ES -J • AV1203C L..0 SAK .1 4?) AY ANGELES AV &L. ,—.1 SHERMAJ x cc toC. TINekA I.E I, 1116-111 12200 600 ! o r.4, FA, keti S r I^i 400 160 100 i /...1 300 -.c I ' X -J: I il MGEL COLIRTNETnE1.1i VI" I ; ii -I cn I orld I I-1TR. LO ,...........1 -c--- ., • • .4711) I",-.8001 City of Moorpark DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. 326 thru 331 Exhibit " 2" 1 SOMMUMMIla MOO ? PARK _ JAMES D. WEAK STEVEN KUENY k4ayo, CityK4anuger THOMAS C. FERGUSON '- CHERYL J. KANE Mayor Pro Tern City Attorney ALBERT PRIETO -- PVIS RICHARD MORTON Councilmember .01tcri,N.reDirector of DANNY A. VVOOLARDCommunity Councilmember Development LETA YANCY-SUTTON R. DENNIS DELZEIT Councilmember City Engineer DORIS O. BANKUS JOHN V. GILLESPIE City Clerk E C)12. INT r) 3VI Chief of Police THOMAS P. GENOVESE City Treasurer 7C CD The Planning Commission ]R. Diane Eaton, Associate Plahner DATE : January 22, 1986 ST-J13.TECTc DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP-326 thru 331 The following condition to be added as a Planning Condition. "That right turn movement from Tech Circle onto Poindexter Avenue shall be restricted with proper traffic signing." DE/crl . -------- ' 799 Moorpark Avenue PWnmqoark, California 93021 (805)529-6874 • Ci'l'Y OF MOORPARK DEPARTMENT OF CCMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 X NEGATIVE DECLARATION _____MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlement; Development Plan Permit No. DP-330 2. Applicant; Anthony Annotti 3. Proposal; 19, 000 square foot industrial office building. 4. Location and Parcel Number(s) : South of Poindexter; between Gabbert Road and Lassen Ave. 5. Responsible Agencies: None. II. STATEAENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of Corrmunity Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environrrent. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, could not, have a significant effect upon the environrrent. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant inpacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) _ DNA III. PUBLIC REvIETR: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2. Document Posting Period; November 26, 1985 - December 17, 1985 ....!,6 Pre..s ze by- Approved by: 11/26/85 ..) - ) (Date) (Narre) (Date) EY.itiBur " " NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, on Wednesday , the 22 day of January , 19 86, beginning at the hour of 7:00 p.m. , in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021 for the purpose of consideration of the proposed project hereinbelow described. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that, pursuant to California State law, an evaluation has been conducted to determine if the proposed project could significantly affect the environment, and that. based upon an unitial review, it has been found that a significant affect would not occur; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with State CEQA- Guidelines issued thereunder. Entitlement: Development Plan Permit No. DP-326 - 331 Applicant: Anthony Annotti Proposal: 6 - Industrial buildings: 1) 8500; 2) 8900; 3) 19,000; 4) 10, 000; 5) 10, 000; 6) 15, 000; Location: South of Poindexter; between Gabbert Road and Lassen Ave. Assessor's Parcel No. : 511-07-02 NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE If you challenge the proposed action in Court, you maybelimited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Department at or prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions or comments regarding the project, contact the Community Development Department at the City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021; Phone: (805) 529-6864. DATED: January 6, , 19 86 . k By: Title: Planning Secretary AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS. CITY OF MOORPARK ) I, DORIS D. BANKUS , City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby certify that on January 6 , 1986 , I caused to be mailed the attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP-326 - 331 for January 22, 1986 before the Planning Commission by placing a copy thereof in the United States mail at Moorpark , California addressed to SEE ATTACHED DATED: January 6, , 1986 . .;o01.11, .., 1 ' i i_-5.Sifirl c%.:,•, milliz....._., seii.:....d_.• -- Iblindif" .44,',%..4 rievb"P-7tm......mkooPc ‘ 14,, Proof of Publication In the matter of This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp Fictitious Business Name Statement No 0/ 2-43 33 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Ventura City of Moorpark I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid. I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter I am the principal clerk of The Moorpark News a newspaper of general circulation published in the city of Moorpark.County of Ventura,and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper (if General circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Ventura, State of California.under the date of April 27 1981 Case number SP49672, that the notice, of which the an- nexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than - nonpareil), has been published in each regular and en- PUBLICNOTICE tire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement `berebygiventthetapubliichearingw7lbeheldbetore thereof on the followingdates,to-wit, Commission of the City o[ oorpark California, 'oo wean ,the 22 day of January,1986, gat the hour of 7:00 p.m.,in the,Coundl Chambers in the City Hall of said City, 'located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021.for the purpose of 'consideration of the .proposed.project hereinbelow described Notice is hereby further given, that, pursuant to California _State law,an evaluation has been conducted to determine if,the rPtosed project could significantly affect the environment, a I I in the year 19_ anmd fit.based ;initial upon an nitipl review,it has been found that a significant affect-would not occur;therefore,a Negative Declaration has been completed in perjury CE$A Guidelines issued thereunder. compliance with State I certify (or declare] under penaltyofthat the foregoing is true and correct APPLICANT:Anthony Annotti PROJECT NO.:DP326.331 Dateda oorpark it.rnia, PROJECT DESCRIPTION:6-Industrial buildings:1)8,500; BCATION South of Poi6ndez�6) etweeen Gabbert Road and this day of . 19 ...al Ave. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.(s):511-07-02 the thproe Cjecityt,cofnytoucthathveeCoanymmquuniesityonsDeovreopmmmeennt tsDeregpartmarding ent441 1` / • Hall,799 Moorpark Avenue,Moorpark,-California 93021; Signature ) Phone (80a1b2g6864 Publish:January 8,1986 MOORPARK NEWS 724D Moorpark Ave P 0 Box 775 Moorpark CA 93021 CITY OF MOORPARK INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Applicant Poindexter Associates 2. Project Description Construct an Industrial Facility - 6 struct- ures containing a) 8, 869; b) 8, 960; c) 20, 800; d) 9, 404; e) 8, 960; f) 17, 204 square feet. 3. Date of Checklist submittal November 19, 1985 4, Project Location South of Poindexter - between Gabbert & Shasta. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) YES MAYBE NO 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? — c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, 11,( or changes in situation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? YES MAYBE NO 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration 10/ of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d. Is there a potential for cumulative adverse impacts on air quality in the project area? 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood lef waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any 110// alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? le( f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Degradation of ground water quality? i. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? j . Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? YES MAYBE NO 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species or numbers of if any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Restrict the range of or otherwise affect any rare or endangered animal species? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an _11( area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife of habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: A a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable resource? YES MAYBE NO 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, tie( distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13, TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular 11/ movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand le( for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation leer- systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or 10/ movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental servies in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? ilee" b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Other governmental services? Vir 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? 1<: c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks.? e. Storm water drainage? 111( f. Solid waste and disposal? g. Street lighting annexation and/or improvements? 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 00/ 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL. Will the proposal: a. Affect possible unknown archaeological or historic- sef al sites? b. Result in destruction or alteration of a known archaeological or historical site within the vicinity of the project? c. Result in destruction or alteration of a known 11, archaeological or historical site near the vicinity of the project? YES MAYBE NO 21. - •ATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a. :oes the project haVe the potential to degrade th, quality of the environment, substantially redu - the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause . fish or wildlife population to drop below se -sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate .lant or animal community, reduce the number o estrict the range of a rare or endangered plan or animal or eliminate important examples of the u. 'or periods of California history or prehisto. ? b. Does the project have t - potential to achieve short-term, to the disadv- .tage of long-term, environmental goals? (A sho• t-term impact on the environment is one which • curs in a relatively brief, definitive pe 'od of time while long-term impacts will endu • well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are dividu- ally limited, but cumulatively considerab -7 (A project may impact on two or more separat resources where impact on ea .h resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) • d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. III. RECOMMENDATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: In conformance with Section 15060 of the State EIR Guidelines, I find with certainity that the proposal would not have a significant impact on the environment. I find the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to class I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION should be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet could be applied to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SHOULD BE PREPARED. I find proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ADDENDUM to an existing certified Environmental Impact Report is required. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and this effect is adequately addressed in a certified Environmental Impact Report, and thus SUBSEQUENT USE of the existing EIR is required. Discussion Although the project may cumulatively have an affect on traffic circulation, the developer (filing/recording Parcel Map 3215) , paid a contribution for the Los Angeles Avenue of Contribution Fund. Date: November 19, 1985 Diane Eaton Associate Planner CONDITIONS FOR: DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP-326 thru APPLICANT: Poindexter Associates DP-331 DATE: January 22, 1986 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 1 . That the permit is granted for the land and project on the plot plan (s) and elevations labeled Exhibits "3 " and "4 " except or unless indicated otherwise herein. That the location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations. 2. That the development is subject to all applicable regulations of the M-1 (Light Industrial ) zone and all agencies of the State of California, County of Ventura, City of Moorpark and any other governmental entities. 3. That unless the use is inaugurated not later than one (1) year after this permit is granted, this permi.t shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may; at his discretion, grant one (1) additional year extension for use iinauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if permittee has diligently worked toward inauguration of use during the initial one year period. 4 . That any minor changes may be approved by the Director of Community Development upon the filing of a Minor Modification applicantion, but any Major Modification is to be considered by the City Planning Commission. 5. That prior to the occupancy or change of occupancy of this building by any tenant, either the owner or prospective tenant shall file a modification application for this permit. The purpose of the modification shall determine if the proposed use is compatible with the existing zoning and. terms and conditions compatible with the existing zoning and terms and conditions of this permit. Also that staff shall review proposed occupancy to determine if the request will be a Minor or Major Modification. 6. That the design, maintenance and operation of the permit area and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable require- ments and enactments of Federal, State, County, and City Authorities , and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference become conditions of this permit. 7. That no conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law, or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. CONDITIONS FOR: DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP-326 thru APPLICANT: Poindexter Associates DP-331 DATE: January 22, 1986 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 8. That if any of the conditions or limitations of this developemnt plan are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth. 9. That prior to construction, a Zone Clearance shall be obtained from the Planning Division and building permit shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Division. 10. That prior to the issuance of a Zone Clearance, a landscaping and planting plan (3 sets) , together with specifications and maintenance program, prepared by a State licensed Landscape Architect, in accordance with County Guidelines for Landscape Plan Check, shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for approval. The applicant shall bear the total cost of such review and of final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting plan shall be accompanied by a fee specified by the City of Moorpark. All landscaping and planting shall be accomplished and approved prior to the inauguration of use of this permit. 11. That the final landscape plans shall provide for a 50% shade coverage within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum mid-day shaded area defined by a selected specimen tree at 50% maturity. Landscaping and irrigation shall be provided to the curb. 12. That all turf plantings associated with this project shall be drought tolerant, low-water using variety. 13. That the final design of site improvements, including materials nd colors, is subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 14. That all roof-mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air- conditioning equipment) that may extend above the parapet wall shall be enclosed on all four sides by suitable screening or fencing. Said screening material shall be of similar material used in the construction of the parent building. Prior to the issuance of a Zone Clearance, the final design and location of the project must be approved by the City Planning Commission. 15. That trash disposal areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building and shall be screened with a six (6) foot high, solid fence or wall enclosure final design of said enclosure shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 16. That all utilities shall be underground. CONDITIONS FOR: DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP-326 thru APPLICANT: Poindexter Associates DP-331 DATE: January 22, 1986 PLANNINGLDEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 17. That all parking shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, stripping and appropriate wheel blocks, curbs or posts in parking areas. 18 . That signs are subject to the City of Moorpark Ordinance Code, Article 24, Sign Ordinance. A sign permit is required. • 19. Roof design and construction shall include a minimum 18" (inch) extension of the parapet wall above the highest point of the roof. 20. That no later than ten (10) days after any change of property owner or of lessee (s) or operator (s) of the subject use, there shall be filed with the Director of Community Development the name (s) and address (es) of the new owner(s) lessee (s) or operators (s) , together with a letter from any such person (s) , acknowledging and agreeing to comply with all conditions of this permit. 21. That the permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court cost which the City may be required by court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve permittee of his obligation under this condition. 22. That• permittee' s acceptance of this permit and/or operation under this permit shall be deemed to be acceptance by permittee of all conditions of this permit. 22. That disposal of all potentially hazardous wastes shall be by a means approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division, and to include State and Federal agencies. 24. *Prior to occupancy by tenant or subsequent owner that would employ or dispose of toxic or hazardous waste a Major Modificaiton shall be processed and filed. 25 . That prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for any or all uses, the applicant must obtain approval from the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. 26 . That at the time water service connection is made, cross-connection control devise shall be installed on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. CONDITIONS FOR: DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP-326 thur APPLICANT: Poindexter Associates DP-331 DATE: January 22, 1986 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS : 27. That the continUedmaintenanEe of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy and defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the City Inspector within thirty (30) days after notification. 28. That prior issuance of a Zone Clearance, a "Unconditional" will serve letter for water and sewer service will be obtained from Ventura County Waterworks District. 29. That right turn movement from Tech Circle onto Poindexter Avenue shall be restricted with proper traffic signing. CONDITIONS FOR: DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP-326 thru APPLICANT: Poindexter Associates DP-331 DATE: January 22, 1986 COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. That access roads shall be installed with an all-weather surface, suitable for access by fire department apparatus . 2. That all drives shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet. 3. That approved turn-around areas for fire apparatus shall be provided where the access road is 150 feet or farther from the main thoroughfare. 4. Any gates, to control vehicle access, are to be located to allow a vehicle waiting for entrance to be completely off the public roadway. If applicable, it is recommended that the gate (s) swing in both directions. The method of gate control shall be subject to review by the Bureau of Fire Prevention. 5, That prior to construction, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on plan within 300 feet of the development. 6. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the Ventura County Water Works Manual. a. Each hydrant shall be a 6 inch wet barrel design and shall have one 4" and two 2}" outlet (s) . b. The required fire flow shall be achieved at no less than 20 psi residual pressure. c. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 300 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 150 feet from any one hydrant. d. Fire hydrants shall be recessed in from curb face 24 inches at center. 7. That the minimum fire flow required is determined by the type of building construction, proximity to other structures, fire walls, and fire protection devices provided, as specified by the I . S .O. Guide for Determining Required Fire Flow. Given the present plans and information, the required fire flow is approximately 2500 gallons per minute. The applicant shall verify that the water purveyor can provide the required quantity at the project. 1 CONDITIONS FOR: DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP-326 thru DPAPPLICANT: Poindexter Associates DP-331 DATE: January 22 , 1986 COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 8. That a minimum individual hydrant flow of 1250 gallons per minute shall be provided at this location. 9 . That address numbers, a minimum of 6 " high, shall be installed prior to occupancy, shall be of contrasting color to the background; and shall be readily visible at night. Where structures are setback more than 250 feet from the street, larger numbers will be required so that they are distinguishable from the street. In the event a structure (s) is not visiable from the street, the address number (s) shall be posted adjacent to the driveway entrance. 10 . That building plans of all"H" occupancies shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 11. That fire extinguishers shall be installed in accordance with National Fire Protection Association, Pamphlet #10 . The placement of extinguishers shall be reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. 12. That building (s) are to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system, plans shall be submitted, with payment for plan check, to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review. 13 . That plans hall be submitted for any hazardous operation for approval by the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention. 14 . That roofing material shall be any fire retardant roofing as defined by the Uniform Building Code. 15. On-site fire hydrant required. CONDITIONS FOR: DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP-326 thru DPAPPLICANT: Poindexter Associates DP-331 DATE: January 22, 1986 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF ' S DEPARTMENT 1. A licensed security guard is recommended during the construction phase, or a 6 ' high chainlink fence will be erected around the construction site. 2. Construction equipment, tools, etc. , will be properly secured during non-working hours. 3. Parking lots will well lighted with a minimum maintained one-foot candle of light at ground level. 4. Lighting devices will be protected against the elements and constructed of vandal resistant materials. 5. Lighting devices will be high enough as to eliminate anyone on the ground from tampering with them. 6. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to eliminate anyone on the ground from tampering with them. That all parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable of illuminating the parking surface with a minimum of one-foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties . All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage resistant covers. 7. Landscaping will not cover any exterior door or window. 8 . Landscaping at entrances/exits or at any intersection within the parking lot will not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 9. Landscaping (trees) will not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a los of light at ground level. 10 . Landscaping (trees) shall not be planted so close to a building so that future growth would allow an individual easy access to the roof. 11 . Address will be clearly visible to approaching emergency vehicles and mounted against a contrasting color. 12 . Address numbers will be a minimum of 6" in height and illuminated during the hours or darkness . CONDITIONS FOR: DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP-326 thru APPLICANT: Poindexter Associates DP-331 DATE: January 22, 1986 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF' S DEPARTMENT 13. That a street width of (see below) shall be provided. a. 36 ' - Two way traffic and on street parallel parking both sides. b. 32 ' - Cul-de-sac serving 15 or less units and less than 800 ' in length. c. 32 ' - (In a 40 ' easement) Roads longer than i mile and providing access to 50 or more possible lots. d. 30 ' - 2 way traffic w/parallel parking one side, off street parking one side. e. 25 ' - 2 way traffic w/off street parking on both sides . f. 24 ' - Hillside development with adjacent 10 ' wide equestrian way. g. 24 ' - Rural zones - 1 acre or larger. Roads shorter than i mile and providing access to between 5 and 50 lots. 14. Driveways or streets within the parking lot area will be wide enough so as to keep the circulation moving smoothly. 1 _ 1 CONDITIONS FOR: DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP-330 APPLICANT: Poindexter Associates DATE: January 22, 1986 CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS 1. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a Grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. 2. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report certified by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved Soils Report. 3. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, street improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvements; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, and paving in accordance with the Ventura County Road Standards . The applicable Road Standard Plates are as follows: Driveway along Tech Circle shall be per Plate E-2, modified to be a total of 30 feet wide and have lo foot radius curb returns. 4. That prior to any work being conducted within the State of City right of way, the developer shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate Agency. 5. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall demonstrate feasible access with adequate protection from a 10 year frequency storm to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark. 6. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the building Permit is issued. CONDITIONS FOR: DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT NO. DP-330 APPLICANT: Poindexter Associates DATE: January 22, 1986 CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS 7. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall indicate in writing to the city of Moorpark, the disposition of any water wells (s) and any other water wells that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly sealed, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. 8. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, drainage plans, hydrologic, and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall enter into an agreement with the City of Moorpark to complete the improvement and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing the construction of the improvements. The drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development: Quantities of water, water flow rates, major water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems, flood hazard areas, sumps and drainage courses. 9. That prior to zone clearance, the developer shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, evidence that all the buildable sites in the subdivision-will be protected from flooding. 10. If the grading operation occurs during the rainy season, (between October and April) , an erosion control plan shall be submitted along with the grading plan. Along with the the erosion control measures, hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be required within 60 days of completion of grading. 11. The developer shall grant a reciprocating access easement to the parcels to the north and east such that traffic from all three parcels may use the common driveway at the south most point of Tech Circle.