The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAG RPTS 1986 0212 PC REGMOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, February 12, 1986 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS - 3 minutes per speaker. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Amendment No. A -85 -3 Amendment to the Zonina Ordinance Changes to industrial setback requirements (Article 23) and to parking and loading and unloading space require- ments. Approval of Resolution No B. Development Plan Permit Nos DP -331 (Poindexter Associat DP -326, DP -327. DP -328. DP -32 The applicant is requesting approval to construct industrial facilities; a) DP -326 - 8,869; b) DP -327 - 8,960; c) DP -328 8,960; d) DP -329 - 9,404; e) DP -331 - 17,204 square feet. The proposed project is located south of Poindexter - between Gabbert Road and Shasta. Approval of Resolution Nos. a) PC -86 -82 b) PC -86 -83 c) PC -86 -84 d) PC -86 -85 e) PC -86 -86 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805)529 -6864 ALBERT PRIETO STEVEN KUENY /^ Mayor City Manager JAMES D. WEAK CHERYL J. KANE Mayor Pro Tam City Attorney THOMAS C. FERGUSON NIALL FRITZ Councilmember O Director of DANNY A. WOOLARD Community Councilmember Development LETA YANCY - SUTTON R. DENNIS DELZEIT Councilmember City Engineer DORIS D. BANKUS JOHN V. GILLESPIE City Clerk Chief of Police JOHN C. GEDNEY A G E N D A City Treasurer PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, February 12, 1986 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS - 3 minutes per speaker. 6. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Amendment No. A -85 -3 Amendment to the Zonina Ordinance Changes to industrial setback requirements (Article 23) and to parking and loading and unloading space require- ments. Approval of Resolution No B. Development Plan Permit Nos DP -331 (Poindexter Associat DP -326, DP -327. DP -328. DP -32 The applicant is requesting approval to construct industrial facilities; a) DP -326 - 8,869; b) DP -327 - 8,960; c) DP -328 8,960; d) DP -329 - 9,404; e) DP -331 - 17,204 square feet. The proposed project is located south of Poindexter - between Gabbert Road and Shasta. Approval of Resolution Nos. a) PC -86 -82 b) PC -86 -83 c) PC -86 -84 d) PC -86 -85 e) PC -86 -86 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805)529 -6864 AGENDA - PLANNING COMMISSION p. 2 - February 12, 1986 CONSENT CALENDAR - continued B. Development Plan Permit No. DP -330 (Poindexter Associates) The applicant is requesting approval to construct an industrial facility DP -330, 20,800 square feet. The proposed project is located south of Poindexter - between Gabbert and Shasta. Approval of Resolution No. PC- 86 -87. COMMISSION ACTION ITEMS A. Decision Making Resolutions Approval of Resolution No. PC -86 -81 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Development Plan Permit Nos. DP -320, DP -321, & DP -322 (F.E. Financial) continued from January 22, 1986 The applicant is requesting approval to construct an industrial facility - 4 structures containing; a) 20,720; b) 13,780; c) 10,736; d) 20,720 square feet. The proposed project is located on Commerce 400 feet south of Poindexter Avenue. B. Amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from "M -L" (Residential Medium Low Density, 2.6 DU /AC average), and "C -2" (General Commercial) to "H" (Residential High Density, 7 DU /AC average); amend the circulation Element of the General Plan to delete a bike path and equestrian trail located on the project site, adjacent to the Arroyo Simi; change the existing zoning from "R -1 -13" (Single Family Residential, 13,000 square feet minimum lot size) and "CPD" (Commercial Planned Development) to "RPD" (Residential Planned Development, 7 DU /AC); create a 62 lot residential subdivision; and construct 62 single- family homes for house- holds with very low and low incomes. The applicant is also requesting approval of a project density bonus and the waiver of development standards as permitted by state law for low income housing projects. Located south of Los Angeles Avenue, east of Liberty Bell Rd. north & adjacent to the Arroyo Simi. S. PUBLIC HEARINGS C. Housing Element - Final Draft AGENDA - PLANNING COMMISSION p. 3 - February 12, 1986 For the purpose of considering approval of the final draft of the Housing Element of the General Plan. 9. COMMISSION COMMENTS 10. STAFF COMMENTS 11. ADJOURNMENT RESOLUTION NO. PC-86-80 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY THAT THE ZONING CODE OF SAID CITY BE AMENDED IN VARIOUS PARTICULARS RELATING TO CHANGES TO INDUSTRIAL SETBACK REQUIREMENTS (ARTICLE 23) AND TO PARKING, LOADING AND UNLOADING SPACE REQUIREMENTS (ARTICLE 41) . WHEREAS, at duly noticed public hearings on November 14 , 1985, November 20, 1985, December 11, 1985, January 8, 1986 and January 22, 1986, the Moorpark Planning Commission considered the the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance (A-85-3) . WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff report dated November 14, 1985 (revised January 23, 1986) has reached its, decision in the matter; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council of said City, that an ordinance be adopted to accomplish the following: A. That the setbacks in industrial zones be as follows : Major Streets - (Los Angeles Avenue, Moorpark Road, Gabbert Road, Poindexter Avenue) Front - 30 feet Side - 20 feet All Other Streets Front - 20 feet Side - 10 feet Side & Rear Yard 30 feet one side - side and rear can be zero except adjacent to residential or a public use. B. That parking requirements be as follows : RESIDENTIAL Single Family Homes - Double garage except City Council may approve one garage and one carport for City sponsored affordable project. RESIDENTIAL (continued) Apartment & Condominiums Efficiency/ 1 Bedroom - *2 } spaces. 2 Bedroom or More - *2 3/4 spaces. *Minimum of 1 space covered and } space uncovered. COMMERCIAL SPACES PER GROSS FLOOR AREA Restaurants One/100 square feet Medical Offices One/200 square feet All other except downtown One/300 square feet Downtown (High Street, Moorpark Road, to western end) One/350 square feet INDUSTRIAL Office - One space per each 300 square feet of gross floor area. Manufacturing - One space per each 500 square feet of gross floor area. Warehousing - One space per each 1000 square feet of gross floor area for the first 20, 000 square feet and one space per 2000 square feet of gross floor area for over 20, 000 square feet with the provision that where it can be shown that a lessor requirement is all that is needed, the owner may put the excess in landscaping and permanently set aside so that parking can be added if needed. C. That the dimensions of parking spaces be 9 'x20 ' for residential and commercial and 8} ' x20 ' for industrial with an additional six inches in width, in each case, when next to a wall. No reduction in size is authorized for compact cars . D. That the requirement for loading and unloading spaces be as follows: INDUSTRIAL Gross Floor Area Spaces Required Under 5000 square feet None. 5, 001 to 30, 000 square feet One Semi-Truck space. Excess of 30, 000 square feet Two Semi-Truck spaces. COMMERCIAL Gross Floor Area Spaces Required Under 10, 000 square feet None. 10, 001 to 30, 000 square feet One delivery van space. 30, 001 to 80, 000 square feet Two delivery van space. Excess of 80, 000 square feet One delivery ban space and one Semi-Truck space. OFFICE Gross Floor Area Spaces Required Under 30, 000 square feet None. 30, 001 to 50, 000 square feet One delivery van space. Excess of 50, 000 square feet Two delivery van spaces. SECTION 2. That at its meeting of January 22, 1986, the Planning Commission took action to direct staff to prepare a Resolution recommending to the City Council that the Zoning Code be amended in var- ious pariculars as outlined abve relating to changes to Industrial Setback Require- ments (Article 23) and to Parking,Loading and Unloading Space Requirements; said Resolution to be presented for Consent Calendar action at the next regularly scheduled meeting. The action with the foregoing direct- ion was approved by the following roll call vote : AYES: Commissioners Holland, Hartley, Claffey, Keenan, and LaPerch; NOES: None; ABSENT: None. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 12 day of February, 1986. ATTEST: Chairman Acting Secretary MOORPARK � : 1G JAMES D. WEAK STEVEN KDENC Mayor --'- "`" - City Manager. MS C. FERGUSON Sr) CHERYL J ;KANE' Mayor Pro Tern r y Attorney r- ALBER7 PRIETO r'es�� RICHARD MORTON- Councilmember gtf•) v,�� Director of DANNY A.WOOLARD '• �� Community Councilmember Development LETA YANCYSUTTON ""'� R.DENNIS DELZEIT Councilmember City Engineer DORIS D. BANKUS JOHN V.GILLESPIE ' City Clerk MEMORANDi7M Chief of Police THOMAS P.GENOVESE City Treasurer TO : The Planning Commission FROM: City Staff - DATE : February 12, 1986 SUBJECT : FINAL DRAFT of the HOUSING ELEMENT The attached replaces the draft housing element. dated January 30, 1986. • • 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,California 93021 (805)529 6874. MichaelBrandman Associates Environmental Research•Planning and Processing•Resource Management February 6, 1986 MEMORANDOM TO: Moorpark Planning Commission FROM: Frank Wein, Director of Planning Services—Michael Steadman Associates, Inc. SUBJECT: Draft Housing Element The following memorandum is a response to the comments and Issues raised by the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development ($CD) • review of the City of Moorpark's draft housing element. Response to comments from HCD: A.1 The final element will include the Department of Pinance's 1985 estimates of 2,841 households and 2,948 household units, and the 1980 state census figure of 210 overcrowded households. A.2 Neither SCAG nor the county have identified the need for housing for the homeless In Moorpark. There are no reliable indicators of homeless in the city;therefore, no special analysis is warranted. A.3 The final element will highlight the actual numbers for housing units In need of rehabilitation and housing units in need of replacement. The draft element included the actual number of units (89) represented by the 3 percent figure of total units. The numbers requested by HCD were estimated by converting the 3 percent figure from the housing survey conducted for the draft element. A.4 The housing-need table on page 33 will be revised to note that the time frame is 1985 to 1990. 13.1 The final element will include a table specifying the number of acres available at each zoning level for development and estimate the potential number of new housing units at buildout. Preliminary calculations Indicate that there are 88 acres available for single-family development and 46 acres available for multiple-family development. Basedtpon a maximum of 8 units per acre for single-family development and 15 units per acre for 3140 Red Hill Avenue,Suite 200,Costa Mesa,CA 92626,(714)641-8042 Memorandum—Moorpark Planning Commission February 6, 1986 Page 2 multiple-family development, the city can expect to gain approximately 704 new single-family housing units and 690 new multiple-family housing units at buildout, representing 45 percent of the total number of units identified in the RHAM. B.2 The city could, in response to applications, increase the housing unit potential through general plan amendments and zone changes. C. The text (pages 22 and 23) of the Housing Element includes an analysis of constraints to housing in the city. The following itemizes the city's required development fees: A. Planning Fees (processing fee) 1. Industrial $1,200 development permit 2. Residential 1,100 development permit 3. Commercial 1,200 development permit 4. Zone change 1,250 5. General plan amendment 1,000 plus $5/acre 6. Conditional use permit 1,100 (agriculture) 7. Conditional use permit 1,400 (commercial & industrial) 8. Conditional use permit 800 (residential) 9. Conditional use permit 1,900 (oil production) 10. Variance 850 11. Lot line adjustment 250 12. Tentative tract map 1,800 plus $35/lot 13. Tentative parcel map 1,400 plus $50/lot 14. Zone clearance 20 15. EIR 2,000 16. Sign permit 20 17. Planned county 1,000 plus $10/acre B. Development Fees (residential) 1. Roads 1.200 2. Schools 2,100 3. Fire 120 4. Police 83 5. Water 360 6. Sewers 1,000 C. Building Bill Windsor 529-3940 D.1 The final element will include an assessment of possible energy conservation opportunities within residential development areas of the city. T • Memorandum—Moorpark Planning Commission February 6, 1986 Page 3 D.2 Additional discussion will be included to describe the city's efforts to incorporate participation from all economic segments of the community in the preparation of this draft housing element. Specifically, the final element will include a chronology noting all Planning Commission hearings held during preparation of the draft element. FEW/la JN 226-0002 • l _. T ,