HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 1986 1008 PC REGTHOMAS C. FERGUSON
Mayor
DANNY A. WOOLARD
Mayor Pro Tern
JAMES A. HARTLEY
Councilmember
ALBERT PRIETO
Councilmember
LETA YANCY - SUTTON
Councilmember
THOMAS P. GENOVESE
City Treasurer
1. CALL TO ORDER
MOORPARK
A G E N D A
MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION
Wednesday, October 8, 1986
7:00 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Vesting Tentative Tract No. TR- 3049 /Residential
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYLJ.KANE
City Attorney
RICHARD MORTON
Director of
Community
Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
To subdivide a 58 acre parcel into 97 lots for 93 single family
units. Located west of the terminus of Loyola Street, south of
Happy Camp Regional Park, north of the CalTrans right -of -way.
(Continued from September 24, 1986)
B. Development Plan Permit No. DP-w355 (Moorpark - Los Angeles)
Requesting approval to construct an 19,992 square foot industrial
facility. 1,200 square feet of office and 18,792 square feet of
manufacturing. Located on Gabbert Road north of Commerce Avenue.
(Continued from September 24, 1986)
C. Development Plan Permit No. DP -357 (Moorpark -_Los Angeles)
Requesting approval to construct a 19,074 square foot industrial
facility. 1,570 square feet of office and 17,504 square feet of
manufacturing. Located on the corner of Gabbert Road and Commerce
Avenue.
(Continued from September 24, 1986)
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
AGENDA - PLANNING COMMISSION
p. 2 - 10/8/86
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
D. Planned Development Permit No. PD -1056 (Burger King -
Li & Daniel Chu
Requesting approval to construct a Burger King Restaurant and
playground contained within the project. The restaurant will
contain approximately 3,074 square feet. Located at the south-
west corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Moorpark Avenue. The site
fronts Los Angeles Avenue.
(Continued from September 24, 1986)
E. Major Modification - Development Plan Permit No. DP -335 Norman
Baker)
Major Modification to establish a permanent industrial development
from a temporary modular building to permanent structure. Located
on the North side of Los Angeles Avenue between Gabbert Road and
Goldman Avenue.
(Continued from September 24, 1986)
F. Safetv Element of the General Plan
The revision of the Safety Element of the Moorpark General Plan.
6. INFORMATION ITEMS
A. Carlsberg Construction Company - Specific Plan
Undeveloped property located adjacent to and south of New
Los Angeles Avenue, east of Moorpark Road, adjacent to and west
of the Moorpark Freeway (23) and north of Tierra Rejada Road.
B. Tract
7. COMMISSION COMMENTS
8. STAFF COMMENTS
9. ADJOURNMENT
ial Planned Develo
) - Minor Modifica
. h - - ITEM 6 _
MOORPARK
THOMAS C. FERGUSON STEVEN KUENY
Mayor o,�' / =9 City Manager
DANNY A.WOOLARD F � CHERYL J. KANE
Mayor Pro Tern ��,,''� City Attorney
JAMES A.HARTLEY Q'� RICHARDDiMORTON
71111101
Councilmember ,.V ectof
ALBERT PRIETO % Community
Councilmember •r., ' Development
LETA YANCY-SUTTON R. DENNIS DELZEIT
Councilmember City Engineer
THOMAS P GENOVESE JOHN V GILLESPIE
City Treasurer MEMORANDUM Chief of Police
TC) = The Planning Commission
F ROM = Michael A. Rubin, Senior Planne•j
DATE = October 3, 1986 (Planning Commission meeting of 10/6/86)
S U B J E C T = TRACT PERMIT NO. TR-3070-4/RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT NO. RPD-857 U.S. Condominium - Request for Minor
Modification
Background
The above tract was approved by the County of Ventura, prior to
the city of Moorpark's incorporation. This tract consists of 92
units. Of the 92 units, ten were originally proposed to be single
family detached units, and the remaining 82 units would have been
attached (41 buildings in a duplex construction with a zero lot
line arrangement) . However due to market demand in the earlier
phases of the tract the developer is requesting a change in the
proportion of attached and detached units. This request is to
increase the number of detached units to 52 and decrease the
amount of attached units to 40.
Discussion
The requested changes from attached units to detached units will
only occur where the five feet sideyard requirements can still
be met. No changes in lot lines would be required. The elevations
of the "newly created" detached units will be the same elevations
of the already approved detached units. No architectural changes
will be required as a result of this request.
The applicant will make a full presentation to the Commission to
illustrate the request and its compatibility with the originally
approved project.
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
► �~"' • +� -
THE PLANNING COMMISSION
p. 2 - 10/3/86
SUBJECT: TRACT PERMIT NO. TR-3070-4/RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT NO. RPD-857 U.S. Condominium - Request for Minor
Modification
1. In the event the Commission feels that this request is
reasonable and the Commission has no objections it may
approve of the Minor Modification as presented, or
2. It may amend the Minor Modification to the Commission's
satisfaction, or
3. The Commission may disapprove the Minor Modification altogether.
4. If the Commission is of the opinion the request is of signi-
ficance to the surrounding property owners, it may set a public
hearing on this matter,
Recommended Action
Approve the Minor Modification request. No action on the part of the
Commission is necessary.
ITEM 6 _
MOORPARK "ia,y()
THOMAS C.FERGUSON STEVEN KUENY
Mayor City Manager
DANNY A.WOOLARD CHERYL J.KANE
Mayor Pro TernCityAttorney
JAMES A HARILEY €11146:41041.04 S 0 y.FL) �+� RICHARDor of
Councilmember V���. Director of
ALBERT PRIETO �� Community
Councilmember ,. Development
LETA YANCY-SUTTON- R.DENNIS DELZEIT
Councilmember City Engineer
THOMAS P.GENOVESE MEMORANDUM JOHN V.GILLESPIE
City Treasurer Chief of Police
TO - The Planning Commission
FROM _ Steven Kueny, City Manager
DATE = October 3, 1986 (Planning Commission meeting of 10/8/86)
SUBJECT: SPECIFIC PLAN - CARLSBERG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Background
Prior to the Moorpark incorporation as a City, the County was in
the process of a review of an application for a Planned Community
project (PC-4) on the subject property. The preliminary draft
of an Environmental Impact Report was prepared and was scheduled
for public review in May of 1983.
•
The proposed project for PC-4 consisted of eight phases to be devel-
oped over an eight year period (an EIR for Phase I was certified
by the Board of Supervisors in 1981). The EIR for PC-4 was a very
thorough environmental analysis and included a Fiscal Impact Report.
Upon incorporation in 1983 PC-4 was dropped and the Carlsberg Const-
ruction Company applied for a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change
from Residential to Industrial on approximately 77 acres in the
northeast corner of the property. This application, which included
an EIR, was denied primarily on the basis of increased traffic. The
zoning and General Plan designation at the time of denial was for
residential with a maximum density of 1.6 dwelling units per acre.
Subsequent to the denial, on June 16, 1986, the Council modified
the General Plan Land Use designation by adding the words "this
area requires the approval of a Specific Plan" for all of the subject
property.
H [LEg C? 9
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
THE PLANNING COMMISSION
p. 3 - 10/03/86
SUBJECT: SPECIFIC PLAN - CARLSBERG CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Discussion (cont.)
2. With this information develop a Specific Plan to include the
selected land uses and specific types and densities for each
use. While the draft Specific Plan document submitted by
Carlsberg provides a good basis, the plan to be reviewed should
reflect the results of the number 1, above and a complete
review of pertinent issues including but not limited to hillside
grading concerns, timing of critical public improvements, and
meeting of General Plan and other City goals and policies.
3. Preparation of an environmental impact report based on the
City plan with the Carlsberg plan as an alternative (if the
two are different). It appears that the previous EIR's can
be used to a certain extent but that at a minimum the traffic
and fiscal impact analysis would definitely need to be updated.
4. That a private firm be retained to prepare a complete scoping
of the project, the necessary specific plan document(s) and
accompanying EIR.
Recommended Action
1. Forward this report to the City Council with any additional
comments and recommendations.
2. Recommend that staff prepare request for proposals (RFP)
for the hiring of a consultant to perform the scoping and to
prepare the necessary Specific Plan documents and accompanying
EIR.
Armyo Simi
•
II / I \ >`5f_ . ' nasleeaual Dwelling u�ls
1 r,:>\ i.4.. Nr Via ,. I l �Jz2 e'e' i�'�
\� Ki
$;;;I` 4 1 f:.A � • I £f t stet 5..• r... . u .m.e c..r..
• yy�[1�1
\ m... k1 riz tt ds 1,, 'a t fir'£ Y' , ..r.r rr.,....r.r
i Is
\� .. Cal t `F;\ � i 5f hdt.
�: . Apr ' Ta;ii
i ,� i.l> /
',V ce . k
j/( l
o I \ }``\`� \.§, !e'l 4 tale '`y 5. %- , - 1 .fir ea.
Land Use area Acres
1 ` \,i ,`\` 4Je. NAy.• H :1: . sro ros
r ,1 J 1 y pYr"F 1'R' S' 4".YY`�� ri
rl r. y V�+ ' LL sr*. ra
,C
Q � .e. .A�£5'•i'S� \"��� r..e.•.... :5
' (I,
0e 61kraS .-4 11A It l/ jI. t % /� \1
r r ///
r• -e- .i• l •
' • l / /ii i ./
tt
'1� n • oii* i . y -� "'• jeX Land Use Anr! DevoloPmenl Plr
P�1 Y�?,_ry r ,c- fill'^•1. is '•
Moorpark
� ' • h Highlands
qi y_., 4=�iG< b`• { -tm -3.'y 1/ Carlsberg Financial Coro-
a .' ...... . ...
Road