Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 1986 1210 PC REGTHOMAS C. FERGUSON Mayor DANNY A WOOLARD Mayor Pro Tern ELOISE BROWN Councilmember JOHN GALLOWAY Councilmember CUNT HARPER Councilmember THOMAS P. GENOVESE City Treasurer MOORPARK A G E N D A MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting of December 10, 1986 7:00 p.m. STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK J. RICHARDS AI.C.P. Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILL.ESPIE Chief of Police 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - (Continued Business), a. Planned Development Permit No. PD1056 Burger King - Herman Li Requesting approval to construct a Burger King Restaurant and playground contained within the project. The restaurant will contain approximately 3,074 square feet. Located at the south- west corner of Los Angeles Avenue. The site fronts Los Angeles Avenue. Recommended for continuance to a date uncertain. b. Development Plan Permit No. DP -348 Epi Silos Requesting approval of a 47,400 square foot self storage facility on Los Angeles Avenue west of Shasta Avenue and east of Goldman Avenue. Recommended to a date uncertain. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS -(New Business) a. Residential Planned Development Permit No PD -1058 G1enHaven Request to construct twenty -two (22) single family residences on t previously approved 22 lot subdivision (TR3306). Location, Inglewood Avenue between Peach Hill Road and the Southern Calif- ornia Edison Company easement. AGENDA - PLANNING COMMISSION p. 2 - December 5, 1986 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS (New Business) b. Tentative Parcel Map No. PM4220 Clifford & Christine May Request to subdivide an existing 3.48 acre lot into three parcels of nearly equal size. 7. INFORMATION ITEMS a. Hillside Grading Ordinance & Industrial Buildout 8. COMMISSION COMMENTS 9. STAFF COMMENTS 10. ADJOURNMENT AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING AGENDA CITY OF MOORPARK ) COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) I, Celia LaFleur, appointed Secretary to the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, County of Ventura, State of California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that I posted a copy of the Moorpark Planning Commission Agenda for the meeting of at the following location: MOORPARK COMMUNITY CENTER 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California, 93021 Said agenda shall remain in place until after the meeting for the availability of public review for at least 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Section 54954 et.seq. of the California Government Code. Executed on this -/7�/t-- day of Moorpark, California. By: _-4 Z2� Celia LaFleur, Secretary to the Planning Commission �r 24 MOORPARK THOMAS C.FERGUSON STEVEN KUENY Mayor f �� City Manager DANNY A.WOOLARD T' CHERYL J.KANE Mayor Pro Tern City Attorney JAMES A.HARTLEY 01V% 44.4 RICHARD MORTON Councilmember ��v'��- Director of ALBERT PRIETO ' j . Develo m nt Councilmember 4*.. °` P LETA YANCY-SUTTON R.DENNIS OELZEIT Councilmember City Engineer THOMAS P.GENOVESE STAFF REPORT TO: JOHN V.GILLESPIE City Treasurer Chief of Police MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION • Meeting of December 10, 1986 RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1058 Subject: Request to construct twenty-two (22) single family residences on a previously approved 22 lot subdivision.(TR3306). Location: Inglewood Avenue between Peach Hill Road and the Southern California Edison Company easement. Applicant: H.A. Russell, President GlenHaven 601 Daily Drive, Suite 232 Camarillo, CA. 93010 General Plan/ Zoning: Medium Density --(3.1-5 DU/AC)/RPD-.4.5U Environmental: Negative Declaration Issues: 1. Building height 2. Aesthetics Discussion: This request represents a resubmittal of a request previously approved by Ventura County, prior to the incorporation of the City of Moopark. Some historical information is provided as follows: Tentative Tract Map No. TR3306/PD914 filed 03/09/79 PD914 approved 11/29/79 Tentative map approved 12/18/79 Final map approved 06/07/83 From the above information, the subdivision portion of the two entitlements was completed. However, the planned develop- ment permit has since expired. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864 t7 RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1058 Discussion: (continued) The expiration occurred either one-and-one-years ago after permit approval, or at best if a time extension was granted the PD permit expired two-and-one-half years after approved. (The County file on this point is unclear.) The latest date of expiration would have been May 29, 1982. The ownership of the project changed in early 1986, with the present appli- cant having acquired an approved and completed subdivision, but an expired PD permit. Approval of a new PD permit is required prior to issuance of a building permit. The subdivision is proposed to be developed, as previously approved, with 22 single family residences on 22 lots. A linear appearance of the subdivision is created due to the long narrow shape of the site. Most of the lots (16) front on Inglewood Avenue; another two lots front on Peach Hill Road and the remaining four lots front on Clavelle Avenue. Lot sizes range from approximately 6,413 square feet to 13,394 .square feet. The average lot size is approximately 8,100 square feet. Each lot meets the minimum setbacks of the RPD zone of 20 feet front and rear, and 5 feet setbacks are provided on the sides. Three different floor plans will be utilized as follows: Plan No. 1 Two-Story 3/Bdrm. , 2i bath, 2,000 sq. ft. Plan No. 2 Single-Story 3/4 Bdrm. 2} baths, 2,300 sq. ft. Plan No. 3 Two-Story 3/4 Bdrm. 3 baths, 2,600 sq. ft. The models showing "3 or 4 bedrooms" indicate three bedrooms with an optional den or fourth bedroom. The building height is limited to 25 feet. A Spanish Mediterranean style of architecture is utilized. Each plan will have three elevation variations. The color scheme will include use of earth tones. An adobe white to a light tan will be the primary stucco colors. Exterior materials will feature wood plant-ons_ and accents. All trim will be in lightly contrasting earth tones. Roofing is proposed to be concrete. California "5" tile roof and will utilize two different earth tone colors in the terra cotta hues. Landscaping will consist solely of front yard landscaping to be provided by the applicant. A tree will be provided in each front yard and two additional trees in the side yard of the two corner lots. There are no common areas in this subdivion to be landscaped. Since the project does not have an entrance street off an arterial street, no theme entry monument is provided as in some of the larger residential projects in the City (e.g. Urban West Communities, Warmington) . -2- 11.1110 RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1058 Discussion: (continueid)' Although only a block wall is shown on lots 6 and 8 on the side yards along Inglewood Avenue, a decorative masonry wall will be required to completely enclose the individual properties. Garages providing covered parking for three cars for each residence will be provided. Plan 3 offers a side entry garage, which will provide visual relief and variety of a front facing garage at a 20 foot setback on every lot. Driveways will be concrete. Even though some variety will exist with the side facing garages, more could be achieved by varying the front setbacks. Sufficient lot depth exists on most of the lots to provide more than the minimum front setbacks. This is only mentioned as an observation and will not be made a condition of approval by the staff. Variation in the front setbacks would perhaps enhance the overall attractiveness of the project. The site plan shows a park adjacent to the southerly boundary of the tract at the rear of lots 13 - 15. This park is part of the common areas of the adjacent subdivision and will not be accessible to the residents of this subdivision on Inglewood Avenue. The topography of the site has a gentle downward trend form the northwest to the southeast and then upward toward the east from the middle of the site. As a result, the individual pads will be lower than those abutting the site (lots 20 and 21) to the north. The pad elevations range from approximately one to five feet lower than the adjacent parcels. However, the pads will generally be higher than the existing tract to the south. The range is height. Only one pad is at this height. Most- -of the pads are two to two-and-one-half feet higher. Four of the pads are nearly level with the adjacent property. A grading permit was already approved for this project on June 9, 1983. A mixture of one and two story homes comprises the tract to the north of this project site. To the south entirely single story homes were constructed. In siting the one and two story models, consideration was given to locating the two story models opposite existing two story homes on Inglewood Avenue wherever possible. (On the site plan, each of the lots immediately abutting the project site is indicated as housing one or two stories by the numbers 1 or 2 placed within the footprint of each neighboring residence.) The area's circulation provides four points of access to Peach Hill Road. Clavelle Court will be extended through the project site so that it is continuous from Granadilla Drive on the south to its: northerly segment north of Inglewood Avenue. -3- 2e1 RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1058 Discussion: (continued) Only a dead end street, not a cul-de-sac is to be constructed for the westerly terminus of Inglewood Avenue. This was allowed to be constructed in_xh s manner as part of the original County approval. Staff is of the opinion that a cul-de-sac would still be beneficial for turning movements and street sweeping, and is recommending the installation of a cul-de-sac in the conditions of approval. The two corner lots (6 and 8) have their driveways close to the intersection, even though, the driveways are at the opposite end of the lots, away from the corner. Due to the curved configuration of Clavelle Court, a minor potential hazard would exist when cars are parked on the driveways of these two lots. To mitigate this hazard it has been stated in the conditions of approval that garage door openers shall be provided for these two lots. The openers will encourage more use of the garages and hopefully keep cars off of the driveways most of the time. A four foot sidewalk and six foot parkway will be provided on Peach Hill Road. On Inglewood Avenue and Clavelle _Court- . a five foot sidewalk will be installed (with no parkway) . Due to the small size of the project it is• proposed to be developed as a single phase. In accordance with Measure F, adopted on November 4, 1986 (Residential Development Management System) an allocation permit will be required of this project prior to issuance of building permits for the 22 single family residences. Criteria for allocating permits has not yet been-:developed. -4- RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1058 Recommended Action 1. Make the following findings: a. The proposed uses would be consistent with the purpose, intent, guidelines, standards, policies, and provisions of the City's General Plan and Chapters 1 and 2 of the Ordinance Code; b. The proposed uses would not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which they are located; c. The proposed uses would be compatible with land uses permitted within the General Plan land use designations and the zones in the general area where the uses are to be located; d. The proposed uses would not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of the property itself or neighboring property or uses; and e. The proposed uses would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. 2. Recommend approval of the attached Negative Declaration to the City Council as having been completed in compliance with State CEQA Guidelines. As part of its approval the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration. 3. Direct staff to prepare a resolution recommending conditional approval of Residential Planned Development Permit No. RPD-1058 for consideration at its next regular meeting of January 5, 1-987. Prepared by: , Approved by: MIchae(A/C/el/7' jl 'u in v atrick J. •- c ards Senior Planner Director o Community Development EXHIBITS: A - Location Map B - Negative Declaration C - Floor Plans D - Elevations E - Site Plan -5- 711.411 : . i : 1 _ ________z_________ _ Amerilz ., _.: ......_________ _ ____ ___ _____ 1,1„, ipso -0,1%-• NI 4uu""litifili X111' ' 111111011111I r _f:__cista reariniiu1�i� =rmiiturrils 1� .mi T ,winaftg.. 4k8,14411 111011 ki"4,„4,101m,„ .,?**47 4 ' Mine 2 '• •741111-64ANO rramTiamwardin viczirminumpinii 4*. . ,„of y,'�;Q,�� o 0 -11, "IL jar: kie .MEI ..11 AIM Immitrumi 1,:‘,;,14, twilit- .Ailapf 11111213r AlE .1.17,17.1.1-19,110. tun r;c.r��•.w■�1 .1� ��• � �''���"��' OP -.,��;,: ♦ :� ; ammo Egfor..:a _::_ ;.= CITY OF MOORPARK 32- DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF CCNMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 >(NEGATIVE DECLARATION MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlement; LTJ (21,4aPek/e12=p154eKir F1524411- 2. Applicant; (01 j , 3. Proposal; ?.2 5 f A L.i% SIM/(,�( aGl�s CO A PIZa--- VIOc-3( Y 4cPtpcZC t) 2-2-"WT 1A (491J (F-Pt)-tC ) 4. Location and Parcel Number(s): Il.2t_el AVE. C .A- 441 LL.. 1W. A LW) -n-►� 4ou- THI 0Q.J G4•l.I F !2 1->I A- I SOIJ G 7. -fP� 7J . .4') '. .i -" .i U- 4 . . _ n SCS?–74-'7 c‹7/ 5. Responsible Agencies: C II. STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Department of Community Development to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could, could not, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: • These potentially significant impacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval. MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: (IF APPLICABLE) III. PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method; Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet.syl . 2. Document Posting Period; cr.V. Zoo — D C_. 10, ) Gf Pre.r ed by:71 / Ap roved by: 72_,L,_J Name) k ' (Date) ) (Date) EXHIBIT " " 33 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark, California, on Wednesday , the 10th day of . December • , 19 gam, beginning at the hour of 7:00 p.m. , in the Council Chambers in the City . • Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark. Avenue, Moorpark, California. 93021 for the purpose of consideration of the proposed project hereinbelow described, NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN, that, pursuant to California State law, an evaluation has been conducted to determine if the proposed project could significantly affect the environment, and that, based upon an unitial review, it has been found that a significant affect would not occur; therefore a Negative Declaration has been completed in-compliance with -State CEQA- Guidelines issued thereunder. Entitlement: Planned Development Permit No. PD-1058 Applicant: GlenHaven Proposal: Construct 22 single family lots. Location: Intersection of Honeybee Street and Peach Hill Road. Assessor's Parcel No. : 507-261-015 thru 075 & 507-0-262-015 NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE If you challenge the proposed action in Court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the -Community Devel. Dept. at or prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions or comments regarding the project, contact the Community Development Department at the City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021; Phone: (805) 529-6864. DATED: November 24 , 19 86 3 By: Title: Administrative Secretary Vol NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO CONCERN PARTIES: The City of Moorpark is currently processing the following land use permit request. California State Law requires that an evaluation be conducted to determine if this project could significantly affect the environment. Based upon an initial review, it has been found that a significant affect would not occur; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Entitlement: RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. RPD-1058 Applicants Name: GLENHAVEN Parcel Size: 4.75 Acres Assessors Parcel No. (s) : 507-261-015 through 507-262-015 Zoning Designation: RPD 4.5 DU General Plan Designation: Medium Density Project Location: INGLEWOOD AVENUE BETWEEN PEACH HILL ROAD AND THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY EASEMENT Description of Land Use That Would Result If Permit Is Approved: 22 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES ON A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 22 LOT SUBDIVISION (RPD1058) The public review period for the draft Negative Declaration is from 11/24/86 to 12/10/86 . I you have any •questions or comments regarding the project or adequacy of the draft Negative Declaration, please call or write, , 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, CA. 93021, (805) 529-6864. Copies of this draft Negative Declaration may be reviewed or purchased at the above address. Prepared by: die.Gt.XDate: //-Z 145 CITY OF MOORPARK INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Applicant gi LAEl'At-�'/L-APE7.jd 2. Project Description ?j ll[�1-...e F f 1 (245.561001K1/ (, L. C)11 Ajk_ APE cA 2Z—L -- fJ�DIUI _/ 62PP I-r k . ( GS) 3. Date of Checklist submittal CAW . Z4, 19e45011, 4. Project Location i OAP • j-- &Oak _i Ui L.-- t2--V �v�17 1'+ S L.E. eA60-f iL II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) YES MAYBE NO 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in situation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? • YES MAYBE NO 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d. Is there a potential for cumulative adverse' impacts on air quality in the project area? 3. . WATER. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in. any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Degradation of ground water quality? i. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? j. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 2)7 YES MAYBE NO 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or -insects)? b. Restrict the range of or otherwise affect any rare or endangered animal species? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable resource? • !" -= YES MAYBE NO 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. . Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental servies in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Other governmental services? 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? V 1541 YES MAYBE NO b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? - c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage?. f. Solid waste and disposal? g. Street lighting annexation and/or improvements? 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public. _ _ or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL. Will the proposal: - a. Affect possible unknown archaeological or historic- al sites? b. Result in destruction or alteration of a known archaeological or historical site within the vicinity of the project? c. Result in destruction or alteration of a known archaeological or historical site near the vicinity of the project? L LID YES MAYBE NO 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individu- ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where impact on ea .h resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. III. RECOMMENDATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: In conformance with Section 15060 of the State EIR Guidelines, I find with certainity that the proposal would not have a significant impact on the environment. _ I find the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to class I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION- should be prepared. _ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet could be applied to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SHOULD BE PREPARED. 41 _ I find proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. _ I find proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ADDENDUM to an existing certified Environmental Impact Report is required. _ I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and this effect is adequately addressed in a certified Environmental Impact Report, and thus SUBSEQUENT USE of the existing EIR is required. 2 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Minor impacts of traffic, noise, headlight glare will result; considering that this site has been intended for this type of development, the associated impacts will be insignificant when compared to the immediate vicinity. The site is presently under-going the necessary grading of the individual pads. Approval of this residential planned development permit will be necessary in addition to a building permit to complete the project. It is reasonable to state the same adverse environmental impacts will occur if the project fails to be completed; if the project is not completed a vacant, graded site would remain in an area intended for residential development. 43 CONDITIONS FOR: RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1058 APPLICANT: GlenHaven DATE: December 10, 1986 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. That the permit is granted for the land as described in the application and any attachments thereto, and as shown on the plot plan submitted. 2. That the permit is granted for all of the buildings, fences, roadways, parking areas, landscaping and other features which shall be located substantially as shown on Exhibit "E", except or unless indicated other- wise herein. 3. That the elevations and floor plans of all buildings shall be substantially in conformance with the elevation plans and floor plans labeled Exhibit C & D. 4. That subsequent to occupancy, minor changes or additions to approved structures, fences, etc, or the construction of patio covers and accessory structures may be approved by the Community Development Director through issuance of a zone clearance provided that the minor change a) is consistent with the conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC and R's) for the project; b) has been approved by the applicable Homeowners Association; c) clearly does not affect the design, integrity, or quality of the development; and d) is consistent with the regulations of the City Zoning Ordinance. Minor changes which do not meet these criteria will require a minor modification of the permit to be considered by the Community Development Director. Any changes determined to be major by the Community Development Director will require the filing of a major modification application to be considered by the Planning Commission. 5. That the .final design of all buildings, communal open spaces, recreational facilities, walls and fences including materials and colors, is subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. Variation in roof colors is required. 6. That all requirements of any law or agency of the State, Ventura County, and City of Moorpark, and any other governmental entity shall be met. 7. That the applicant agrees as a condition of issuance (or renewal) the use of this permit, to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit, or in the alternative, to relinquish this permit. Applicant will reimburse the City for any court costs and/or attorney's fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of any such action. City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under the condition. 8. That prior to zone clearance a pad certification form shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works. Said form shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development prior to zone clearance or issuance of building permit. CONDITIONS FOR: RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1058 APPLICANT: GlenHaven DATE: December 10, 1986 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 9. That unless a zone clearance for a unit is issued within thirty-six (36) months after the date the permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Community Development Director may, in his discretion, grant two separate 12 month extensions for issuance of a zone clearance for a unit in each phase, provided: a) the application for extension is made prior to the expiration of the initial thirty-six (36) months; b) there has been no change in the approved plans; c) there has been no change of circumstance which will revent the preservation of the integrity, character, utility or value of the property in the zone and the general area in which the use is proposed to be located or will be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare; and d) the permittee has diligently worked toward initiation of construction of each the phase of the development during the initial thirty-six (36) month period. 10. That signs are subject to the regulations of Chapter 12, Title 9 of the Moorpark Municipal Code. 11. That a transfer of this permit shall not be effective until the name and address of the transferee and date when such transfer shall be effective, together with a letter from the new owner certifying agreement to comply with all conditions of the permit is filed with the Community Development Director. 12. That the development is subject to all applicable regulations of the "R-P-D-4.5" (Residential Planned Development) zone. 13.a. That prior to issuance of the--zone clearance, a landscaping, planting and irrigation plan for that phase, together with specifications and a maintenance program, shall be prepared by a state-licensed landscape architect. The Ventura County Guide to Landscape Plans, dated July 1982, shall be used. The landscaping plan shall show planting within the front yards of all residential lots in the subdivision; areas along any man-made slopes adjacent to the developed areas and along interior streets. Land- scaping in these areas shall incorporate drought resistant and native plant materials as feasible, and shall be chosen to_insure adequate erosiion control, and to mitigate the visual impacts of all man-made slopes three feet or more in height. Landscaping shall not cover any door or window. Landscaping at entrances and exits and intersections will not block or screen the view of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian, nor be placed directly under overhead lights which could cause a loss of light at ground level. All of the landscaping described above, with the exception of that within individual lots, shall be maintained by the individual homeowners. b. Prior to preparation of the landscaping plan, the landscape architect shall consult with the Director of Community Development regarding species to be planted and the overall landscape concept to be used. c. Three set of plans shall be submitted for approval to the Director of Community Development. 45' CONDITIONS FOR: RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1058 APPLICANT: GlenHaven DATE: December 10, 1986 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 13.d. The applicant shall bear the total cost of such review and of final install- ation inspection. All landscaping installation described above (with the exception of the private recreational facilities) shall be completed prior to issuance of the last certificate of occupancy. 14. That prior to issuance of the first zone clearance, the developer shall submit a plan showing fencing along the side and rear yards of each residential lot. Said fencing plan shall identify the location and materials to be used (wrought iron, pilasters, slumpstones, etc. , but no wood) and shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. Said fencing shall be completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the affected lot. 15. Prior to the issuance of the zone clearance a plan showing the location of mail boxes shall be submitted to the Community Development Director for approval upon review by the Moorpark Postmaster. 17. That all residential units shall be constructed employing energy saving devices as may be appropriate to the State of the Art. These are to include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Low flush toilets (not to exceed 1-1/2 gallosn) . b. Shower controllers. c. Stoves, ovens and ranges, when gas fueled, shall not have continous heating source to have night setback features. d. All thermostats connected to the main space heating source to have night setback features. e. Kitchen ventilation system to have automatic dampers to insure closure when not in use. f. Solar panel stubouts. g. Floor plans to demonstrate reservation of space for solar equipment adjacent to furnace. 18. That gutters and downspouts shall be provided over all garage doors and front entryways, unless covered. 19. If a model home complex is to be constructed, it shall be permitted within the tract boundaries, subject to issuance of a zone clearance. A site plan shall be submitted which indicated the location of dwelling units, sidewalks, landscaping, fencing, patios, directional and advertising signs, parking and lighting. 4' • CONDITIONS FOR: RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1058 APPLICANT: GlenHaven DATE: December 10, 1986 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 20. That prior to issuance of a zone clearance, an "Unconditional" Will-Serve Letter for water and sewer service for that phase shall be obtained from Ventura County District No. 1. 21. In accordance with the Residential Development Management System, an allocation permit shall be required prior to issuance of a zoning clearance and/or building permit. 22. A cul-de-sac shall be constructed to City standards at the existing westerly terminus of Inglewood Avenue. Any necessary easement or agreement with the Southern California Edison Company shall be made to complete the cul-de-sac. 23. A garage door opener shall be provided with the residences on lots 6 and 8, to encourage use of the garage. • 4/ CONDITIONS FOR: RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1058 APPLICANT: GlenHaven DATE: December 10, 1986 VENTURA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. A licensed security guard is recommended during the construction phase, or a 6 foot high chainlink fence shall be erected around the construction site. 2. Construction equipment, tools, etc. , shall be properly secured during nonworking hours. 3. All appliances (microwave ovens, dishwashers, trash compactors,etc.) shall be properly secured prior to installation during nonworking hours. All serial numbers shall be recorded for identification purposes. 4. If an alarm system is used, it should be wired to all exterior doors and windows and to any roof vents or other roof openings where access may be made. 5. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core minimum of 1 and 3/4 inches thick or of metal construction. 6. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5) pintumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of 1 inch. 7. All exterior sliding glass doors or windows shall be equipped with metal guide tracks at the top and bottom and be constructed so that the window cannot be lifted from the tract when in the closed or locked position. 8. Upon occupancy by the owner or proprietor, each unit shall have locks using combinations which are interchange free from locks used in all other separate dwellings, proprietorships, or similar distinct occupancies. 9. Address shall be clearly visible to approaching emergency vehicles and mounted against a contrasting color. 10. Front door entrances shall be visible from the street. 421 CONDITIONS FOR: RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1058 APPLICANT: GlenHaven DATE: December 10, 1986 VENTURA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. That street signs shall be installed prior to •any occupancy. 2. That prior to zoning clearance, the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for the approval of the location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on plan within 500 feet of the development. 3. That a minimum fire flow of 1,000 gallons per minute shall be provided at this location. 4. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of the County Water Works Manual. 5. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cleared for a distance of 100 feet prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Weed Abatement Ordinance. 49 MOORPARK THOMAS C.FERGUSON STEVEN KUENY Mayor City Manager DANNY A WOOLARDCHERYL J.KANE Mayor Pro Tern Mg 4,11 City Attorney ELOISE BROWN .OrtradiNtlame PATRICK J.RICHARDS A.I.C.P. Councilmember -a SW Director of JOHN GALLOWAY \ Community Councilmember Development CUNT HARPER R.DENNIS DELZEIT Councilmember City Engineer THOMAS P.GENOVESE JOHN V.GILLESPIE City Treasurer Chief of Police I t_AN D U Al The Planning Commission I=15t(DIVE : Michael A. Rubin, Senior Planner December 10, 1986 T_J 'Ts PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD-1058 (GlenHaven) Additional information on the above subject is provided as follows: 1. The conditions of approval of the original tract (TR-3306) are attached (see Exhibit A) . 2. Additional Community Development Department conditions are attached (see Exhibit B) . 3. The City Engineer's conditions are attached (see Exhibit C) . 4. The Parks and Recreation Commission is expected to review this project at its meeting of December 17, 1986. Any conditions the Parks Commission wishes to impose on this project will be incorporated into the Planning Commission's resolution on this matter. The resolution will appear on the Commission's January 5, 1987 agenda for adoption. 5. Among the original conditions of approval of the County resolution regarding this tract were Conditions No. 10 and 38. These required the payment of an in-lieu Park and Recreation fee (No. 10) and a payment of $1,200 per lot toward the improvement of Moorpark and Tierra Rejada Roads (No. 38) . This is a predecessor to the current Area of Contribution requirement. Both these conditions were required to be satisfied prior to recordation of the final tract map. However, the County file on this matter does not document payment of these fees. Therefore, they have been made conditions of approval again. If the applicant can document that these fees have been paid, then these conditions will be considered to be satisfied. If they have not been satisfied then the current applicable rates will be applied. 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864 CONDITIONS FOR: TR-3306 APPLICANT: Nicola RESOLUTION NO: PAGE: 1 PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: - 1. That the conditions of approval of this Tentative Map supersede all conflicting notations, specifications, dimensions, typical sections and the like which may be shown on said map and that all of the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, Ventura County Subdivision Ordinance and adopted County policies apply. 2. That all requirements of any law or agency of the State, Ventura County and any other governmental entity shall be met. 3. That no zone clearance shall .be issued for this permit until the final tract map has been recorded. Prior td construction, a zone clearance shall be obtained from the Planning Division and a building permit shall be obtained from the Division of Building and Safety. 4. That, prior to obtaining a grading permit, the Planning Director shall approve the grading plans to insure that they meet with the intent expressed by the tentative map. 5. That all utilities shall be placed underground. 6. That the interior noise levels of dwelling units on Lots 21 and 22 shall be attenuated in conformance with the noise insulation standards of Chapter 1, Article 4, Section 1092 of Title 25 of the California Administrative Code. Noise source levels shall be based upon the (1990) traffic volumes projected along Peach Hill in the Environmental Impact Report for this project. Determination as to whether the architectural design for these dwelling units complies with this condition shall be made by the Building and Safety Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. That prior to recordation, copies of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. 8. That prior to recordation, copies of the By-laws shall be submitted to the • Planning Director for approval. The purpose of the Homewoners Association shall be to oversee and maintain the architectural and aesthetic compatibility of the developments. 9. That prior to the issuance of a building permit a planned development permit shall be applied for and granted by the Planning Commission. PROPERTY ADMINISTRATION AGENCY CONDITIONS: 10. That prior to recordation the applicant shall pay all fees as determined by the P.A.A. pursuant to Ventura County Ordinance No. 3216, Sections 8297-4 et seq. for the purpose of providing fees in lieu of land dedication for local park acquisition and/or development for the future residents of the subdivision. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CONDITIONS: 11. That prior to occupancy adequate sanitary facilities shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Health Division. 12. That prior to occupancy adequate, safe, potable supply of water shall be provided for the occupants and users of these facilities. 13. That prior to occupancy crass-connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Division. 14. That in order to protect the public safety and prevent groundwater pollution, any abandoned wells on the property shall be destroyed in accordance with the Ventura County Well Ordinance prior to occupancy. EXHIBIT " A " • Staff Report and Recon,..i. Dation Meeting of November 12, 1981 TR-3306 (Time Extension); Page 4 g. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements would not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision; h. There would be no discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system in violation of existing water quality control requirements under Water Code Section 13000 et. seq.; and i. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public waterways, rivers, streams, coastlines, shorelines, lakes or reservoirs; and RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1. Find that the environmental effects discussed in the EIR prepared for Tracts 2451, 2798, and 2865, and the environmental effects of this proposed project are similar enough to warrant the same treatment in an El R and certify that the Tracts 2451, 2798 and 2865 El R adequately covers the impacts of this project and pursuant to Section 15088 of the State EIR Guidelines, that this body has reviewed and considered the information contained therein and endorses the reasons which have been given in this staff report for allowing the occurrence of the significant impacts identified in the El R that was earlier prepared for Tracts 2451, 2798 and 2865; and 2. Adopt the proposed findings and a resolution recommending approval of a one year time extension for the processing of Tentative Map No. TR-3306, subject to the attached conditions. Final action on this request will be taken- by the Board of Supervisors on November 24, 1981. Prepared by: Revie by: Randall Richardson, AICP /4 Wg /�illidG Case Planner 'ennis T. Davis, AICP Manager, Planning Division DTD:RR:IP81y Attachments - Exhibit 1 - Location Map Exhibit 2 - Tract Map Exhibit 3 - Minutes of Moorpark MAC CONDITIONS FOR: TR-.,s06 APPLICAr4T: Nicola c Z RESOLUTION NO: PAGE: 2 15. That prior to recordation, the applicant shall demonstrate the availability of domestic water for all parcels created by submitting a "will-serve" letter from a domestic water purveyor licensed by the Ventura County Division of Environmental Health or the State of California Department of Public Health • to the Ventura County Division of Environmental Health and the Ventura County Public Works Agency; or 16. That at the time water service connection is made, cross-connection control devices shall be installed on the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Division of Environmental Health. 17. That prior to recordation, a "will-serve" letter shall be obtained for sewage service for each lot created. Said letter shall be filed with the Ventura County Division of Environmental Health and the Ventura County Public Works Agency. . FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: 18. That street signs shall be installed prior to occupancy. 19. That prior to construction; the applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for the approval of the location of fire hydrants. Show existing hydrants on plan within 500 feet of the development. . 20. That a minimum fire flow of 1000 gallons per minute shall be provided at this location. 21. That fire hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction and shall conform to the minimum standards of'the Ventura County Water Works Manual. • a. Each hydrant shall be a 6' wet barrel design, and shall have one 4" and one 2k" outlet. b. The required fire flow shall be"achieved at no less than 20 psi residual pressure. c. Fire hydrants shall be spaced 500 feet on center, and so located that no structure will be farther than 250 feet from any one hydrant. d. Fire hydrants shall be 24" on center, recessed in from the curb face. 22. That all grass or brush exposing any structures shall be cieared prior to framing, according to the Ventura County Weed Abatement Ordinance. 23. That an approved spark arrester shall be installed on the chimney of any structure located within 200 feet of brush area. 24. That address numbers shall be installed prior to occupancy, and shall be of contrasting color to the background and shall be readily visible at night. The numbers shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Director and the Fire Chief. 25. That portions of this development may be in Fire Zone 4 and shall meet Building Code requirements for the brush zone. PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY CONDITIONS: 26. The following Board of Supervisors' policies shall apply: a. Access Policy b. Paveout Policy c. Sewer Policy d. Street Lighting Policy e. That all streets within the tract and Peach Hill Road adjacent to the tract shall be dedicated prior to recordation and improved to include concrete curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, street trees, traffic signs and paving to meet existing street improvements, in accordance with specificaitons of Public Works Agency. • g3 CONDITIONS FOR: TR-3306 APPLICANT: Nicola • RESOLUTION NO: PAGE: 3 Prior to recordation, developer shall submit improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall enter into an agreement with County to complete the improvements and shall post a bond in an amount to be approved by Public Works guaranteeing construction of the improvements. The street tree plan shall be prepared by a licensed Landscape Architect. The applicable Ventura County Road Standard Plates are: Plate B-4A - Peach Hill Road Plate B-S - "A" Street and Clavelle Avenue 27. That prior to recordation, grading plans, drainage plans and hydraulic . calculations shall be submitted to Public Works Agency for approval. So that building pads, street rights of way and streets are protected from 50, 100 and 10-year storms, respectively, drainage plans and calculations shall indicate the following conditions before and after development: quantities of water, rates of flow, major.water courses, drainage areas and patterns, diversions, collection systems and drainage course. 28. That prior to recordation, off site drainage acceptance deeds shall be . obtained. 29. That prior to recordation, developer shall submit said grading and drainage plans and hydraulic calculations prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall enter into an agreement with the County to complete the improvements. 30. That prior to recordation, the tract shall be annexed to County Service Area No. 14. Ornamental streetlight standards shall be installed, all County Service Area charges paid by developer until area appears on service area assessment rolls and for the first year thereafter, over and ' above anticipated tax revenue. 31. That if archaeological or historical materials are uncovered during land modification activities, the site shall be preserved until a qualified archaeologist is consulted for proper disposition of site and a concurrence received from Public Works Agency. 32. That cut and fill slopes shall be maximum 2:1 in accordance with the Grading Ordinance unless otherwise approved by Public Works Agency as provided in said ordinance. 33. That an encroachment permit is required for all work within County right-of-way. 34. That the "C" Court and Clavelle Avenue connection shall be aligned to the satisfaction of the Public Works Agency. 35. That prior to recordation, developer shall submit soils and geology reports to the satisfaction of Public Works Agency. 36. That prior to recordation, developer shall submit sewer and water improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, shall enter into an agreement with Waterworks District No. 1 to complete these improvements, and shall post a bond in an amount determined by the District guaranteeing construction of sewer improvements. • 37. That prior to issuance of a will-serve letter from Waterworks District No. 1, all sewer and water connection fees must be paid in accordance with the rules and regulations of the District. 38. That prior to recordation the developer shall contribute 1,200 per lot for improvements to Moorpark/Tierra Rejada Roads. RR:IP72r 511.1 • CONDITIONS FOR: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD-1058 APPLICANT: GlenHaven DATE: December 10, 1986 ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. The two existing mature trees on the site, located within close proximity to Peach Hill Rd. shall not be removed and shall be protected during construction to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 2. Second story windows on the rear elevations shall not provide a direct line of sight to the neighboring properties to the rear (south). 3. - all be reviewed by the Parks and Recr- - • • • .... . the purpose of makin: .e.icating land for park purposes • : •. 'went of an in-lieu fee. ' 4. uance of a zone clearance the applicant shall pay all fees • . to the City of Moorgarr-Maft-lcipal Code, Sections 827•-. - _ •r t e purpose of providing fees in lieu • .. •r local park acquistion and/or develo.i•- • - .. • acilities for the future residents • .- S.r I 5. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be immediately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. NOTE: Corrections per January 5, 1987 staff report. EXH=B=T " B " s CONDITIONS FOR: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. PD-1058 APPLICANT: GlenHaven DATE: December 10, 1986 CITY ENGINEER CONDITIONS 1. Prior to occupancy of any of the units, the developer shall install two-way':: stop signs on North Clavelle Avenue at East Inglewood Street complete with appropriate pavement markings to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2. Prior to occupancy of any of the units, the developer shall paint red curb markings on the west side of North Clavelle Avenue between the curb return and the first driveway south of East Inglewood Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. Prior to issuance of a zone clearance the developer shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Moorpark Road/Tierra Rejada Road Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Moorpark Road/Tierra Rejada Road Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the zone clearance is issued. EXHIBIT " C •• ORDINANCE NO. 72 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 1.01.320 TO CHAPTER 1.01 OF TITLE 1 OF THE MOORPARK MUNICIPAL CODE, MAKING APPLICABLE THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1094.6 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, PROVIDING FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS. WHEREAS, Section 1094.6(g) of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California permits the governing body of a local agency to adopt an ordinance making Section 1094.6 of said Code of Civil Procedure applicable to such local agency; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that such will provide an orderly and reasonable procedure for the review of administrative decisions; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Section 1.01.320 is hereby added to Chapter 1.01 of Title 1 of the Moorpark Municipal Code, to read as follows: "Section 1.01.320. The provisions of Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure are applicable to the City of Moorpark." SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted, and shall, within fifteen days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark News, a weekly newspaper of general cir- culation, as defined in Section 6008 of the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby designated for that purpose. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1986. Mayor of the City of Moorpark, California ATTEST: City Clerk (SEAL) ITEM S I( RESOLUTION NO. 86- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPLICATION OF SUN EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION COMPANY (SUN OIL) FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP-4502. WHEREAS, at duly notice public hearings on December 11, 1985, and January 8, 1986, the Moorpark Planning Commission considered the application of Sun Exploration and Production Company (Sun Oil) , requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP-4502) to approve the drilling of one (1) exploratory oil well on property located approximately 6,000 feet southwest of the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue and College View Avenue, in the City of Moorpark; and WHEREAS, after careful consideration, the Planning Commission reached its decision in the matter, as is set forth in its Resolution No. PC-86-74, adopted January 22, 1986, recommending denial of said Conditional Use Permit No. CUP-4502; and WHEREAS, public notice having been given in time, form and manner as prescribed by law, the City Council of the City of Moorpark has held a public hearing, has received testimony regarding said application, has duly considered the entitlement applied for and the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, has determined that the entitlement applied for would have a significant effect on the environment, and has reached it decision in the matter; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the application of Sun Exploration and Production Company (Sun Oil) for Conditional Use Permit No. CUP-4502 is hereby denied without prejudice under the permitted findings as follows: "The proposed use would impair the integrity and character of the zone and area in which it was proposed to be located". "The proposed use would be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, and welfare". SECTION 2. That this resolution shall take effect immediately. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of June, 1986. Mayor of the City of Moorpark, CA. ATTEST: City Clerk (SEAL)