HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 1987 0119 PC REGMOOLvARK
THOMAS C. FERGUSON
STEVEN KUENY
Mayor
City Manager
DANNY A. OLARD
WOHERYLJ.KANE
C
Mayor Pro Tern
City Attorney
ELOISE BROWN
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Councilmember
Director of
JOHN GALLOWAY
o
Community Development
Councilmember
R. DENNIS DELZELT
CLINT HARPER, PhD.
City Engineer
Councilmember
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
MAUREEN W. WALL
Chief of Police
City Clerk
THOMAS P. GENOVESE
A G E N D A
City Treasurer
MOORPARK PLANNING COMMISSION
January 19, 1987
7:00 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
- 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Meeting of January 5, 1987
6. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. Residential Planned Development Permit No. PD -1058
Glen Haven
Request to construct 22 single family residences on a pre-
viously approved 22 lot subdivision (TR- 3306). Located on
Inglewood Avenue between Peach Hill Road and the Southern
California Edison Company easement.
Approval of Resolution No. PC -87 -123
b. Planning Commission Recommendation - Update
General Plan re Land Use /Circulation Elements
Approval of Resolution No. PC -87 -124
C. Planning Commission Recommendation re Traffic
of Service
Approval of Resolution No. PC -87 -125
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529.6864
AGENDA - PLANNING COMMISSION
p. 2 - January 19, 1987
7. PUBLIC HEARING (Continued Business)
a. Tentative Parcel Map No. 4220, Clifford & Christina Ma
Request to subdivide an existing 3.48 acre lot into three
parcels of nearly equal size. Located on the north side
of Los Angeles Avenue between Moorpark Road and Nogales Ave.
b. Development Plan Permit No. 348, Epi Silos /Sterling Storage
Requesting approval of a 47,400 square foot self storage
facility on Los Angles Avenue west of Shasta Avenue and east
of Goldman Avenue.
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS (New Business)
a. Development Plan Permit No. 332, Cabot Cabot & Forbes
Request approval to construct an industrial facility
which encompasses 39,424 square feet on a 87,991 square
foot (2.02 acre) site. Located at Condor Drive, east of
Los Angeles Avenue.
b. Planned Development Permit No. 1059, Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Request approval to rebuild service station to construct
a "Self -Serve Only" and a Mini -Mart facility of approximately
930 square feet.
C. xevision to uraaing Flan -
Adjustment to pad elevation grades causing 103,000 cubic
yards to be readjusted on the subject site. Adjacent to
Campus Park Drive, Marquette Street and the future streets
of Marymount, Queens Court, Luther Circle, Loyola Street
and Marquette Circle.
9. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ITEMS
a.
Wall review per Condition No. 25 of the previously approved
Resolution No. 85 -240 of RPD Permit No. 1044.
b. Request of the City Council for a Joint Meeting
um
AGENDA - PLANNING COMMISSION
p. 3 - January 19, 1987
10. INFORMATION ITEMS
a. Industrial Buildout
b. Recreation Fees re Development Projects
C. Steve Brodsky re RPD -1044, Cal Prop
Public comments expressed at the 1/5/87 PC meeting.
d. Goldman Avenue On- Street Parking Problem
11. COMMISSION COMMENTS
12. STAFF COMMENTS
13. ADJOURNMENT
MOORPARK
,....,THOMAS C. FERGUSON
Mayor
DANNY A WOOLARD
Mayor Pro Tem
ELOISE BROWN
Councilmember
JOHN GALLOWAY
Councilmember
CUNT HARPER
Councilmember
THOMAS R GENOVESE
City Treasurer
CITY OF MOORPARK )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL d KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK J. RICHARDS AI.C.P.
Director of
Community
Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
I, Celia LaFleur, duly appointed Deputy City Clerk of the City of
Moorpark, County of Ventura, State of California, do hereby certify
that I posted a copy of the Planning Commission Agenda for the
meeting to be held January 19, 1987 1987 at the following
location:
City Hall
Council Chambers
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, California
Said agenda shall remain in place until after
it is available for public review for at least
the meeting, pursuant to Section 54954 et.seg.
Government Code.
v rot
Celia LaFleur (SEAL)
Deputy City Clerk
Date: January 14, 1987
93021
the meeting so that
72 hours prior to
of the California
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
MOORPARK . ITEM NO _ 8 . a.
THOMAS C.FERGUSON
Mayor :•.;y 1/4:114.1stn
DANNY A.WOOLARD �� •c, CHERYL J.KANE
Mayor Pro Tem �`�• City Attorney
ELOISE BROWN 41111PIPIF/ PATRICK RICHARDS,AI.C.P.
Councilmember 4 A Director of
JOHN GALLOWAY �,�: Community Development
Councilmember o R.DENNIS DELZEIT
CUNT HARPER,PhD. `b � City Engineer
Councilmember JOHN V.GILLESPIE
MAUREEN W.WALL Chief of Police
City Clerk THOMAS P.GENOVESE
MEMO RAN D UM City Treasurer
T O : The Planning Commission
412-
FROM : Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development
DATE : January 19, 1987
SUBJECT : REQUEST OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR JOINT MEETING
The City Council at their meeting of January 7, 1987 requested
a joint meeting with the Planning Commission. It is suggested
that the Commission consider the Council ' s request at your next
meeting of January 19, 1987. The Council did not set a specific
date for the Commission to consider.
In addition the Commission should consider topics for discussion
with the Council.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Request a date for a joint meeting with the Council.
2. Suggest topical items for discussion.
/crl
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
I IL-1 IO
Moorpark City Hall
799 N. Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Attention: Planning Commission
Dear Planning Commission Members:
The Marlborough Moorpark Homeowners-Association (MMH4 hereby request
permission from the City of Moorpark to landscape the Southwest corner
of the intersection of Peach Hill Road and Moorpark Road. The MMHA
proposes to provide all labor and materials to install and maintain
(for a period of not less than five (5) years) all landscaping and
irrigation in accordance with the attached Drawing, dated 1985.
In granting permission to the MMHA to landscape said corner, the City
of Moorpark agrees to indemnify, save harmless, and defend the MMHA,
its agents, and members from and against any and all suits, action,
legal proceedings, claims, demands, damages, costs, and expenses ,
whatsoever kind of character (including, but not limited to, attorney's
fees and expenses) caused by any wrongful acts or any omission, fault
or negligence of the City or anyone acting on the City's behalf in
connection with incidents involving Tis corner property.
After five (5) years, the City may recind this agreement with (60)
sixty days written notice to MMHA. The City also agrees that the
MMHA is not responsible, physically or monitarily, for the removal
and disposal of the landscaping and irrigation should the City at
some future date recind this agreement.
MARLBOROUGH MOORPARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
P. O. Box 712
Moorpark, CA 93021
Carl Wesely, pard Member Gary Bucoard Member
Date: , // / 5— Date: 9-/c
Title:
City of Moorpark
Date:
i2; . ‘'-
cre X44
MOORPARK F°i�
" AS
799 MOORPARK AVENUE 1 ��1''�® CITY COUNCIL
P.O.BOX 701,MOORPARK,CA 93021 09lo / LETA YANCY-SUTTON
o
(805) 529-6864 9aren 4v� ALBERT PRIETO
MAYOR PRO TEM
ROBERT BEAULIEU
CLINT HARPER,Ph D.
JERRY STRAUGHAN
May 30 , 1984
Dear
The Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark is
commencing a study of our existing sign ordinance, looking
toward its revision and updating.
The City will consider the adoption of a "theme" for future
development, possibly to depict "Southwestern Village" , and
the League of California Cities office in Los Angeles has
advised us that your City might have developed a sign
ordinance which addresses the subject of themes in its
structure.
We would very much appreciate receiving a copy of your sign
ordinance and thank you in advance for responding to this
request. Once we have completed the development of our
ordinance, we will furnish a copy to the League office, and
will be happy to send you a copy also, if you desire. Just
so indicate on the bottom of this letter and return it to us
when you send your ordinance.
Very truly yours
6 /_€. , ,
JAMES A. HARTLEY, chairman
Moorpark Planning Commission
JAH:ddb
Yes , I would like a copy of your sign ordinance
when it is completed.
17
,, .
, - 7, - e
I
--) - ex ...or
., -
.',.'
I .
..... ' ,....
-471t4/
rtY'VV 7r
)
44.
(7-172Z1 )
ITEM 8.c.
M OO RPARK
THOMAS C.FERGUSON
Mayor City Manager
DANNY A.WOOLARD �� CHERYL J.KANE
Mayor Pro Tern City Attorney
ELOISE BROWN F�/ PATRICK RICHARDS,A.I.C.P.
Councilmember 11440% Director Director of
JOHN GALLOWAY _=t�'�: Community Development
Councilmember , R.DENNIS DELZEIT
CUNT HARPER,PhD. 'b�� City Engineer
Councilmember JOHN V.GILLESPIE
MAUREEN W.WALL Chief of Police
City Clerk THOMAS P.GENOVESE
MEMORANDUM City Treasurer
T O : Planning Commission
R O M : Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development
DAT E = January 13, 1987
S U B J E C T : TRACTS 3070-4 and 4170 (U.S. CONDOMINIUM CORPORATION) -
REQUEST TO REVISE GRADING PLAN
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to the City Council policy regarding changes to approved grading
plans (see Exhibit A, item 3) , the attached (Exhibit B) request is being
transmitted to the Planning Commission for its review prior to consideration
by the City Council. The request is to distribute approximately 103,000
cubic yards within or adjacent to the site.
The applicant has provided a grading plan with the revisions shown in red.
The original pad elevations are shown in a box within each lot. Their
proposed revisions are indicated below each box. An area to the north
of the project site will receive most of the surplus dirt. This area is
located in the County. One receiver area is within the project site.
None of the receiver areas are near existing developed areas, including
the pads proposed to be raised. The benefit of this proposal of dealing
with the surplus dirt is that no export of dirt would be required from the
site, and no truck traffic would be generated on City streets.
The City Engineer has also addressed this request (see Exhibit C) .
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommended that the requested grading plan revision be approved by the
City Council.
PJR:igb
Attachments
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
•g . - ---
•
Gc:C311- )
q`q
United States Condominium Corporation14;� ;
9601 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 333, Beverly Hills, CA 90210 • (213) 276-3113
P 0 Box 276,Moorpark, California 93020 • (805) 529-3338
December 31 , 1956
Planning Commissioner
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 993021
RE: Tract 3070-4 and 4170 Grading
Dear Commissioner:
Enclosed is a package of information regarding our request to make
grading revisions on our Tracts 3070-4 and 4170. The projects have
been graded simultaneously to ensure a balance of dirt. As we have
come to the end of the job a grading surplus has occured. We have
strived to come up with a plan for relocating the excess dirt
(approximately 103,000 yards) , which will result in the least impact
on the project and surrounding neighborhoods.
Our original proposal, presented to the City Council, required
constructing new slopes and raising pads up to five (5) feet. The
impact of this plan was considered too dramatic. Subsequently, we
have completely redesigned this relocating plan, which significantly
decreases the impact of the work.
To this end, we are proposing that the excess dirt be placed in the
following manner.
1. Approximately 69,000 yds of dirt will be relocated into
county land in three (3) areas, which are contiguous
to our current project. The dirt will be placed in
these pockets, utilizing undulating slopes to minimize
any impact. The three (3) pockets are all located on
County of Ventura property and have been tentatively
approved by the County, contingent upon the City of
Moorpark approval . The most significant of the three (3)
pocket locations in the County is in one of the more
desireable areas per the Moorpark City Council .
2. Of the 156 lots in the two phases 34, will be
raised a maximum of 3 ft.
3. With the approval of this new plan, it is the intent
that there should be no export of dirt.
EXHIBIT " B "
. ,
. .
Page 2
This plan, once recommended for approval by the Planning Commission,
we request that this submittal be passed on to the Moorpark City
Council for their review and final approval .
Very truly yours,
0:4
Al Dick,
Presdient
AD:kh
DEC 3 1
CT! • r•
MOORPARK ITEM 9.a.
THOMAS C.FERGUSON
Mayor ff'f��/�•••. City Manager
DANNY A.WOOLARD rear CHERYL J. KANE
Mayor Pro Tern t�Oilkera City Attorney
A
ELOISE BROWN Ort4 v� PATRICK J. RICHARDS A.LC.P.
Councilmember {,.V�� Director of
JOHN GALLOWAY \ Community
Councilmember 4111 Development
CLINT HARPER R. DENNIS DELZEIT
Councilmember City Engineer
THOMAS P.GENOVESE JOHN V.GILLESPIE
City Treasurer Chief of Police
MENTOR.ANIJUM
'S O : The Planning Commission
F ROM : Michael A. Rubin, Senior Planne .4 I
DATE : January 5, 1987
S TJ B J E C T : RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.
RPD-1044 (Cal Prop) Condition Compliance
Review of Wall Plan
BACKGROUND
The above request is related to a 66 lot subdivision (Tract 4037)
bounded by Moorpark road on the northeast, Peach Hill road on the
south, and easterly of Vista Del Valle Drive. The tract and planned
development permit were approved by',the City Council on October
21, 1985 . The final map was recorded on September 10, 1986 . A condition
of approval of the planned development permit requires that the wall
plan be approved by the Planning Commission.
DISCUSSION
The wall plan consists of two materials - slumpstone and wrought iron.
The walls are shown on the construction detail sheet as five (5) feet
above finished grade with a pilaster extending an additional six (6)
inches (see detail F) . A slumpstone cap is proposed on top of the wall
and pilaster. This type of wall is used through most of the subdivision.
The perimeter wall on Peach Hill Road will be of this combination as
well as the easterly half of the Moorpark Road segment of the wall .
Where view lots. exists -:the__rear wall is proposed to be a combination
of four courses of slumpstone as a base with 3 feet of iron above
(see detail E) . This will be provided at rear lot lines of view lots
as well as the side lot lines that border the westerly half of Moorpark
Road.
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
The Planning Commission
p. 2 - January 5, 1987
DISCUSSION (continued)
A variation of the above two wall types will also be used as a retaining
wall in at least one location between Lots 11 & 12 . This wall will
be a 6 foot slumpstone base with 5 feet of iron above.
A staff concern is the location of the walls on some of the corner lots .
Ideally, a five foot setback between the sidewalk and slumpstone wall
would be best for aesthetic relief. Some of the corner lots do not
provide this separation of the wall and sidewalk because the top of
the slope being adjacent to the sidewalk. It appears that this deficiency
is a function of the design of the subdivision and is too late to allow
for any setback now. Lots 30, 36, and 49 are three corner lots that
appear to have walls located where they could be moved back from the
sidewalk five feet.
A second staff concern is that the fence height is only five feet. This
applies to both the slumpstone and iron walls. The pilaster extends
one additional course above five feet. Staff ' s opinion is that the
five foot height does not afford sufficient privacy and that this height
should be increased to six feet.
Sideyard gates will be provided as shown in detail J. No color of the
gates is specified on the plans. The gates are proposed to be fabricated
of resawn cedar with douglas fir frames.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve the wall plan with the following modifications .
1. A side wall setback of 5 feet shall be provided on Lots 30, 36
and 49 unless it is adequately demonstrated that this is infeasible.
2 . Wall height shall be increased to 6 feet from finished grade to
the top of the top course of masonry or wrought iron (the top of
the pilaster shall be located one course higher) .
3. Gates shall be painted to match the color of the slumpstone .
/crl