HomeMy WebLinkAboutAG RPTS 2002 0408 PC REGMOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 517 -6200
PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
April 8, 2002
7:00 p.m.
Next Resolution No. PC- 2002 -423
1) CALL TO ORDER:
2) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
3) ROLL CALL:
William F. Otto, Chair
Kipp Landis, Vice Chair
Mark DiCecco
Paul Haller
Janice Parvin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Any member of the public may address the Commission during the Public Comments
portion of the Agenda, unless it is a Public Hearing or a Presentation /Action /Discussion
item. Speakers who wish to address the Commission concerning a Public Hearing or
Presentations /Action /Discussion item must do so during the Public Hearing or
Presentations /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda for that item. Speaker cards must be
received by the Secretary for Public Comment prior to the beginning of the Public
Comments portion of the meeting and for Presentation /Action /Discussion items prior to the
beginning of the first item of the Presentation /Action /Discussion portion of the Agenda.
Speaker Cards for a Public Hearing must be received prior to the beginning of the Public
Hearing. A limitation of three minutes shall be imposed upon each Public Comment and
Presentation /Action /Discussion item speaker. A limitation of three to five minutes shall be
imposed upon each Public Hearing item speaker. Written Statement Cards may be
submitted in lieu of speaking orally for open Public Hearings and
Presentation /Action /Discussion items. Copies of each item of business on the agenda are
on file in the office of the Community Development Department/Planning and are available
for public review. Any questions concerning any agenda item may be directed to the
Community Development Department at 517 -6233.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate
in this meeting, please contact the City Clark's Department at (805) 517 -6223. Notification
48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to
ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102- 35.104; ADA Title II).
020408 -pca 414102 12:35 PM
❑ Packet to CM ❑Packet to CC
PATRICK HUNTER ROSEANN MIKOS CLINT HARPER KEITH F. MILLHOUSE JOHN E. WOZNIAK
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
April 8, 2002
Page 2
4) PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
5) REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA:
6) CONSENT CALENDAR:
A) Planning Commission Minutes of January 27, 1997.
B) Planning Commission Minutes of May 12, 1997.
C) Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes of May
27, 1997.
D) Planning Commission Special Meeting Minutes of June
9, 1997.
E) Planning Commission Minutes of June 23, 1997.
F) Planning Commission Minutes of February 11, 2002.
7) PUBLIC COMMENTS:
8) PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A) Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2002 -01, An Amendment to
Ordinance No. 195 "Carlsberg Specific Plan Land Use
Regulations" and Minor Modification No. 4 to
Carlsberg Specific Plan (SP 92 -01) Regarding
Lighting Regulations, on the Application of Zelman
Retail Partners, Inc.. Staff Recommendations: 1)
Open the public hearing, accept public testimony,
discuss issues identified in the staff report, and
close the public hearing; 2) Adopt Resolution No.
PC -2002- recommending to the City Council
approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -01
and Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg
Specific Plan, subject to conditions of approval.
9) DISCUSSION ITEMS:
10) ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
11) ADJOURNMENT:
ITEM G. /9
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of January 27, 1997
Page 1
The Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission was held January 27,
1997, in the City Council Chambers, Moorpark Civic Center, 799
Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Acosta called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Millhouse led the pledge of allegiance to the
flag.
3. ROLL CALL
Chairman Acosta, Commissioners Lowenberg, Miller, Norcross,
and Millhouse were present at the meeting.
Staff attending the meeting included Nelson Miller, Director
of Community Development; Paul Porter, Senior Planner; Dirk
Lovett, Assistant City Engineer; and Celia LaFleur,
Administrative Secretary.
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None
5. REORDERING OF THE AGENDA
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
None
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
F 1997 -01 -27 PCM
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of January 27, 1997
Page 2
A. Consider a request from A. DeeWayne Jones, for a General
Plan Amendment from M (Medium Density Residential) to C -2
(General Commercial) and Zone Change No. 96 -1 from R -1 -8
(Single Family Residential 8,000 square foot minimum) to
CPD (Commercial Planned Development) on a four -acre
parcel contiguous with the Southwest Quadrant of Mission
Bell Plaza - Phase 2 (Assessor Parcel No. 511 - 140 -13) .
Staff Recommendation: 1.) Determine that the General Plan
Amendment and Zone Change is exempt from the State
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) in that the proposed
change in the General Plan Land Use and Zoning
Designation do not have the potential for causing a
significant effect on the environment. 2.) Direct staff
to prepare a Resolution making recommendations to the
City Council, as deemed appropriate with respect to the
request and options identified within the staff report
for the General Plan and Zoning Designation of the
subject property.
Paul Porter, Senior Planner presented the Commission with the
staff report.
MOTION: Commissioner Millhouse moved and Commissioner
Lowenberg seconded a motion to direct staff to prepare a
Planning Commission Resolution recommending to the City
Council that the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are
exempt from the State California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines, and recommending approval of the General Plan
Amendment and the Zone Change.
Motion passed with a 4:1 voice vote. Commissioner Miller
voting NO.
B. Consider a request for an Ordinance Amendment No. 96 -1
requesting revisions to the Municipal Code to all
recreational vehicle storage in the Commercial Planned
Development (CPD) Zone on the application of A.C.
Construction. Staff Recommendation: 1.) Determine that
the allowing recreational vehicle storage at the A. C.
Construction property is categorically exempt pursuant to
State CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) in
that the proposed amendment to the Municipal Code does
not have the potential for causing a significant effect
on the environment. 2.) Direct staff to prepare a
F 1997 -01 -27 PCM
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of January 27, 1997
Page 3
Resolution making recommendations to the City Council, as
deemed appropriate, with respect to the options
identified within the staff report.
MOTION: Commissioner Miller moved and Commissioner Lowenberg
seconded a motion to continue the public hearing to the next
regular Planning Commission meeting of February 10, 1997.
Motion passed with a 5:0 unanimous voice vote.
10. DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
11. ANNOUNCEMENTS or FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
The Director reminded the Commission of the upcoming Planning
Commission Conference dated March 12 -14, 1997.
12. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
Ernesto Acosta, Chairman
By William F. Otto, Chair
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt,
Acting Community Development Director
F 1997 -01 -27 PCM
ITEM 6• B
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of May 12, 1997
Page 1
The Regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held May 12,
1997, in the City Council Chambers, Moorpark Civic Center, 799
Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:12 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Keith Millhouse led the pledge of allegiance to
the flag.
3. ROLL CALL
Commissioners Miller, Millhouse and Lowenberg were present at
the meeting. Chairman Acosta was absent and Commissioner
Norcross arrived at 7:50 p.m.
Staff attending the meeting included Nelson Miller, Director
of Community Development; and Celia LaFleur, Administrative
Secretary.
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None
5. REORDERING OF THE AGENDA
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Planning Commission Minutes of April 14, 1997, February 10,
1997, and November 25, 1996.
MOTION: Commissioner Millhouse moved and Commissioner Miller
seconded a motion to approve the minutes of April 14, 1997,
and February 10, 1997.
Motion passed with a 3:0 voice vote, Commissioner Norcross and
Chairman Acosta absent.
MOTION: Commissioner Millhouse moved and Commissioner Miller
seconded a motion to continue approval of the minutes of
November 25, 1996, to the next regular meeting of the Planning
Commission.
Motion passed with a 3:0 voice vote, Commissioner Norcross and
Chairman Acosta absent.
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
None
F 1997 -05 -12 pcm
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of May 12, 1997
Page 2
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 97.02 - Consider an
amendment to the Zoning Ordinance which would require a
City Council approved Conditional Use Permit for any
business selling alcoholic beverages. Location Citywide.
Staff Recommendation:
1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony,
and close the public hearing.
2. Determine that the modification to the City's Zoning
Ordinance are categorically exempt pursuant to
State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3).
3. Adopt Resolution No. PC -97 -336, recommending to the
City Council adoption of an Ordinance requiring a
Conditional Use Permit application for a request
for an alcoholic beverage license, rescinding
Ordinance 222 and Resolution No. 95 -1170.
MOTION: Commissioner Millhouse moved and Commissioner Miller
seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. PC -97 -336,
recommending to the City Council adoption of an Ordinance
requiring a Conditional Use Permit application for a request
for an alcoholic beverage license, rescinding Ordinance 222
and Resolution No. 95 -1170.
Motion passed with a 3:0 voice vote, Commissioner Norcross and
Chairman Acosta absent.
B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 97.03 - Consider revisions
to Section 17.20.060 (Permitted Uses in Commercial and
Industrial Zones) of the Moorpark Municipal Code (City of
Moorpark Zoning Ordinance) to delete automobile service
stations as a conditional use in industrial zones.
Location Citywide.
Staff Recommendation:
1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony,
and close the public hearing.
2. Determine that the modification to the City's Zoning
Ordinance are categorically exempt pursuant to
State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3).
3. Adopt Resolution No. PC -97 -337, recommending to the
City Council adoption of an ordinance amending the
Municipal Code Section 17.20.060 to delete the use
of automobile service stations with a Conditional
Use Permit within the Industrial Park (M -1) and
Limited Industrial (M -2) zoning districts; and,
delete footnote "0" from Notes for Table 17.20.060.
F 1997 -05 -12 pcm
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of May 12, 1997
Page 3
MOTION: Commissioner Millhouse moved and Commissioner Miller
seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. PC -97 -337,
recommending to the City Council adoption of an ordinance
amending the Municipal Code Section 17.20.060 to delete the
use of automobile service stations with a Conditional Use
Permit within the Industrial Park (M -1) and Limited
Industrial (M -2) zoning districts; and delete footnote "0"
from Notes for Table 17.20.060.
Motion passed with a 4:0 vote. Chairman Acosta was absent.
C. Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 97.04 - Consider revisions
to Chapter 17.20, Uses by Zone, regarding the allowable
uses in each zone and also revisions to Chapter 17.44,
Entitlement Process and Procedures. Location Citywide.
Staff Recommendation:
1. Open the public hearing and accept public testimony.
2. Review and discuss the potential changes to Table
17.20.050, Permitted Uses in Open Space,
Agricultural, Special Purpose and Residential
Zones.
3. Direct staff to prepare a resolution with
recommendations to the City Council.
CONSENSUS: By consensus of the Commission, Item 9.C. was
continued to the Regular Meeting of May 28, 1997.
10. DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
11. ANNOUNCEMENTS or FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None
12. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m.
Ernesto Acosta, Chairman
By: William F. Otto, Chair
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt
Acting Community Development Director
F 1997 -05 -12 pcm
TTFM
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of May 27, 1997
6. C
Page 1
A Special Meeting of the Planning Commission was held May 27, 2001,
in the City Council Chambers, Moorpark Civic Center, 799 Moorpark
Avenue, Moorpark, California.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at
7:01 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Bart Miller led the pledge of allegiance to the
flag.
3. ROLL CALL
Commissioners Keith Millhouse, Bart Miller, Paul Norcross and
Chairman Ernesto Acosta were present at the meeting.
Commissioner Lowenberg was absent, but later arrived at 7:58
p.m.
Staff attending the meeting included Nelson Miller, Director
of Community Development; and Celia LaFleur, Administrative
Secretary.
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None
5. REORDERING OF THE AGENDA
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Joint City Council /Planning Commission minutes of
February 26, 1997
B. Planning Commission Minutes of November 25, 1996
CONSENSUS: By consensus of the Commission, the February 26,
1997 and November 25, 1996 minutes were approved.
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
None
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 97.04 - Consider revisions
to Chapter 17.20, Uses by Zone, regarding the allowable
uses in each zone, also revisions to Chapter 17.44,
Entitlement Process and Procedures. Location Citywide.
(Continued from May 12, 1997). Staff Recommendation:
Continue the public hearing and accept public testimony.
F 1997 -05 -27 pcm
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of May 27, 1997
Page 1
Review and discuss the potential changes to Chapter 20,
Uses by Zone and any related revisions to Chapter 17.44,
Entitlement Processes and Procedures. Direct staff to
prepare a resolution with recommendations to the City
Council.
CONSENSUS: By consensus of the Commission, this item was
continued to June 23, 1997, and scheduled a Special Study
Session of the Planning Commission for June 9, 1997 at 6:00
p.m.
10. DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
11. ANNOUNCEMENTS or FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None
12. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m.
Ernesto Acosta, Chairman
By: William F. Otto, Chair
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt
Acting Community Development Director
F 1997 -05 -27 pcm
iTF,M -Co. D. nm�
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of June 9, 1997
Page 1
The Special Meeting of the Planning Commission was held on June 9,
1997, in the City Council Chambers, Moorpark Civic Center, 799
Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, 93021.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting called to order at 6:30 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
Chairman Acosta, Commissioners Lowenberg, Norcross and
Millhouse were present at the meeting, and Commissioner Barton
Miller was absent, but arrived later in the meeting (at 7:00
P.M.).
Staff attending the meeting included Nelson Miller, Director
of Community Development; Dirk Lovett, City Engineer; and
Celia LaFleur, Administrative Secretary.
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None
5. REORDERING OF THE AGENDA
None
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
None
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Study Session of the Planning Commission
Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 97.04 - Consider revisions to
Chapter 17.20, Uses by Zone, regarding the allowable uses in
each zone, also revisions to Chapter 17.44, Entitlement
Process and Procedures. Location citywide. Staff
Recommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate.
The Commission discussed allowable uses and purposes of Open
Space, Agricultural, and Residential zones.
F 1997 -06 -09 pcm
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of June 9, 1997
Page 2
A brief presentation was provided by June Dubreuil, Parks &
Recreation Commissioner, concerning open space zoning.
CONSENSUS: By consensus of the Commission, this item was
continued to the Planning Commission meeting of June 23,
1997.
9. DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
10. ANNOUNCEMENTS or FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None
11. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Ernesto Acosta, Chairman
By: William F. Otto, Chair
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt,
Acting Community Development Director
F 1997 -06 -09 pcm
T T Co. E.
.. EM E.
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of June 23, 1997
Page 1
The Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission was held June 23,
1997, in the City Council Chambers, Moorpark Civic Center, located
at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, 93021.
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:11, Chairman Acosta
presiding.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Miller led the pledge of allegiance to the flag.
3. ROLL CALL
Chairman Acosta, Commissioners Lowenberg, Miller, Millhouse,
and Norcross were present at the meeting.
Staff attending the meeting included Nelson Miller, Director
of Community Development; Dirk Lovett, Assistant City
Engineer; Sandra Massa - Lavitt, Contract Planner; and Celia
LaFleur, Administrative Secretary.
4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None
5. REORDERING OF THE AGENDA
By consensus of the Commission, the agenda was reordered to
discuss Public Hearing Item 9.B. prior to 9.A.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
None
7. PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
None
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
B. Consider request for Industrial Planned Development
Permit No(s): IPD -97.1 and IPD -97.2, Conditional Use
Permit No. 97 -1 (Morehead). A proposal to construct an
automotive lube and tune facility and one
warehouse /industrial building on one parcel. Automotive
F 1997 -06 -23 pcm
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of June 23, 1997
Page 2
Lube and Tune Building 2312 square foot,
Warehouse /Industrial Building 4992 square feet.
Conditional Use Permit No. 97 -1 for proposed automobile
repair use. Located on the northwest corner of Los
Angeles and Goldman Avenues, in the City of Moorpark.
Assessor's Parcel Nos.: 511 -0- 151 -065 and 075. Staff
Recommendation: 1. Open the public hearing and accept
public testimony. 2. Review, consider, and adopt the
Mitigated Negative Declaration. 3. Review and adopt the
proposed mitigation monitoring program. 4. Make the
appropriate findings and adopt the attached resolution
recommending to the City Council, Industrial Planned
Development Permits 97 -1 and 97 -2, and Conditional Use
Permit No. 97 -1.
MOTION: Commissioner Norcross moved and Commissioner Millhouse
seconded a motion to continue the public hearing of Industrial
Planned Development Permits 97 -1 and 97 -2, and Conditional Use
Permit No. 97 -1 to the Planning Commission meeting of July 14,
1997, to consider issues of traffic ingress /egress,
architectural design, landscaped access, parking lot shading,
and truck maneuvering and loading areas.
Motion passed on a 5:0 unanimous voice vote.
A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 97.04 - Consider revisions
to Chapter 17.20, Uses by Zone, regarding the allowable
uses in each zone and also revisions to Chapter 17.44,
Entitlement Process and Procedures. Location Citywide.
Staff Recommendation: Planning Commission continue their
review of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment and upon
completion direct staff to prepare a resolution to the
City Council incorporating all recommended changes.
MOTION: Chairman Acosta moved and Commissioner Millhouse
seconded a motion to continue Zoning Ordinance Amendment No.
97.04 to a Special Meeting on June 30, 1997, at 6:00 p.m. for
the purpose of a work study session.
Motion passed with 5:0 unanimous voice vote.
10. DISCUSSION ITEMS
None
11. ANNOUNCEMENTS or FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None
F 1997 -06 -23 pcm
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Minutes of June 23, 1997
12. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
Ernesto Acosta, Chairman
By: William F. Otto, Chair
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt,
Acting Community Development Director
Page 3
F 1997 -06 -23 pcm
ITEM 6• F mm�
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Meeting Minutes of February 11, 2002
Page 1
1) CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Parvin called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
2) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Chair Parvin led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3) ROLL CALL:
Janice Parvin, Chair
William F. Otto, Vice -chair
Mark DiCecco, Commissioner
Paul Haller, Commissioner
Kipp Landis, Commissioner
Commissioners DiCecco, Haller, Landis, Vice -chair Otto
and Chair Parvin were all present.
Staff attending the meeting included Steven Kueny,
City Manager; Deborah Traffenstedt, Acting Community
Development Director; Paul Porter, Principal Planner;
Walter Brown, City Engineer; Laura Stringer, Senior
Management Analyst; and Gail Rice, Secretary II.
4) PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDATIONS AND SPECIAL
PRESENTATIONS:
A) Consider Selection of Chair and Vice -chair for
2002.
MOTION: Chair Parvin moved and Commissioner Landis
seconded a motion to nominate Commissioner Otto to
serve as Chair. Motion Carried (5:0 Roll Call Vote).
MOTION: Commissioner Parvin moved and Chair Otto
seconded a motion to nominate Commissioner Landis to
serve as Vice - chair. Motion Carried (Unanimous 5:0
voice vote) .
S: \Community Development \Everyone \PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES \020211 -pcm is review.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Meeting Minutes of February 11, 2002
Page 2
5) REORDERING OF, AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA:
None.
6) CONSENT CALENDAR:
A) Planning Commission Minutes of November 13, 2001,
Special Meeting.
B) Planning Commission Minutes of November 19, 2001,
Special Meeting.
C) Planning Commission Minutes of November 26, 2001.
Staff noted a correction to Item 8.A. of the
November 13, 2001, minutes to reflect that
Commissioner Landis seconded the motion.
Chair Otto commented on a desire that the minutes
reflect more information to help indicate the
view of the speaker.
MOTION: Commissioner DiCecco moved and Vice -chair
Landis seconded a motion to approve the minutes
for the November 13 (as corrected), November 19,
and November 26, 2001, meetings. Motion carried.
(Unanimous 5:0 voice vote.)
7) PUBLIC COMMENTS:
None.
8) PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Consider Commercial Planned Development Permit No.
2001 -01, a request for Construction of a 357,621
square foot commercial center and Vesting Tentative
Tract Man No. 5321 for subdivision of approximately 29
acres into eight lots. Staff Recommendations: 1) Open
the public hearing, accept public testimony, discuss
issues identified in staff report, and close the
public hearing; 2) Consider that the Environmental
S: \Community Development \Everyone \PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES \020211 -pcm is review.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Meeting Minutes of February 11, 2002
Page 3
Impact Report for the Amended Carlsberg Specific Plan
adequately addresses the impacts of the proposed
commercial project; 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -
recommending to the City Council approval of
Commercial Planned Development No. 2001 -01 and Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 5321, subject to conditions of
approval; 4) Recommend that the City Council direct
the Planning Commission to initiate study of
modifications to Chapter 17.30 of the Zoning Ordinance
and /or Ordinance No. 195 related to lighting; 5)
Recommend that the City Council direct the Planning
Commission to initiate study of amendment of the
Carlsberg Specific Plan related to signage.
Paul Porter, Principal Planner, gave the staff report
pointing out that the Planning Commission would need
to provide direction on several issues, including:
• Recommendation on the appropriateness of permitting
the overhang of the pedestrian walkways as shown on
the site plan;
• Recommendation to the City Council regarding whether
the Caltrans right -of -way along New Los Angeles
Avenue provides an acceptable landscaped setback for
the project;
• Recommendation to the City Council on initiation of
a zoning amendment pertaining to lighting standards
for the Carlsberg Specific Plan SR /C /BP Overlay
Zone;
• Recommendation to the City Council on initiation of
amendment of the Signage Plan section of the
Community Design Plan for the Carlsberg Specific
Plan to allow the requested pylon signs, including
the one offsite location.
The Planning Commission queried staff regarding:
• Sufficiency of stacking for access into the project
from New Los Angeles Avenue;
S: \Community Development \Everyone \PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES \020211 -pcm is review.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Meeting Minutes of February 11, 2002
Page 4
• Clarification of overhang permitted for 20 foot
parking spaces;
• Caltrans right -of -way landscaping;
• 50% tree canopy shading requirement;
• Lighting fixture proposed by the applicant;
• Retaining walls;
• Condition 32 (b) : As to the requirement, if any for
City council approval of the art work placed per
"Art in Public Places" program;
• Condition 33: Clarification of specimen tree sizes
and removal of trees on site;
• Condition 39: As to why the project should not
include skylights;
• Condition 52: As to which buildings are referred to;
• Condition 19: As to what the shaded areas on
Tentative Tract Map referred to.
Staff provided responses.
Chair Otto opened the public hearing.
Robert Exel: Applicant's representative, Zelman Retail
Partners; 515 South Figueroa, Suite 1230; Los Angeles, CA
90071
Mr. Exel provided a summary of interested retailers,
including Target and Kohl's. He added that additional
prospects included T J Maxx, Michael's, Linens -N-Things,
Bath and Body Works, a cellular company, Famous Footwear,
Quizno's, Java Juice, Panda Express and Baja Express. Mr.
Exel further stated that no leases had been signed yet, but
several of the prospects were very interested.
Mr. Exel addressed the major challenge of getting Kohl's
open by March 2003, and retaining smaller tenants without
the two large anchors.
S: \Community Development \Everyone \PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES \020211 -pcm is review.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Meeting Minutes of February 11, 2002
Page 5
Brian Wolfe, Architect, P &R Architects; 111 W. Ocean
Boulevard, Long Beach, CA.
Mr. Wolfe provided a brief history of working with staff,
and addressing feedback from the Planning Commission and
City Council on the architecture and site plan, summarizing
the changes that had been made to the site plan, building
orientation, architectural detail and landscaping. He
further discussed materials and colors proposed for the
project. Mr. Wolfe described the attempts to meet a level
of quality while balancing the project budget. Mr. Wolfe
provided further details of the project, including its
pedestrian scale environment and food court amenities. Mr.
Wolfe also discussed the applicant's request for the option
to do skylights over the stockroom for better energy
efficiency for the Target building as will as other retail
tenant buildings.
Mr. Wolfe concluded his presentation with details of the
proposed master sign program.
Charles Fole , Landscape Consultant, 320 Loma Avenue; Long
Beach, CA 90814
Mr. Foley addressed the proposed site landscaping,
hardscape features and lighting. He provided the
Commission with details of the project theme, Caltrans
right -of -way landscaping issues, shade coverage, plant
material, walkways (including paving materials) , planter
areas, bike storage and pedestrian circulation.
Larry Gates, Civil Engineer, 8175 E. Kaiser Boulevard;
Anaheim Hills, CA 92808
Mr. Gates stated that he was available for questions.
Clare Look - Jaeger, Traffic Engineer, Linscott Law
Greenspan, 234 East Colorado Boulevard, Suite 400;
Pasadena, CA 91101
Ms. Look - Jaeger offered to answer any traffic - related
questions.
S: \Community Development \Everyone \PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES \020211 -pcm is review.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Meeting Minutes of February 11, 2002
Page 6
The Commission queried the applicant and commented on the
following:
• Master Sign Program.
• Final Design issues for tenants.
• Proposed off -site signage.
• Shopping cart storage.
• Landscaping along Miller Parkway.
• Desire for more landscape along the back of the
project.
• Height, illumination ratio, drop -down lens and
number of light poles.
• Clarification on the food court rendering.
• Seating capacity.
• More decorative elements in the south and east
corners, the rear elevation at Kohl's and Target.
• Clarification of westbound turn lane into the
facility.
Chair Otto called a recess at 8:47 p.m. Vice -chair Landis
left the meeting during the recess.
At 9:12 p.m., Chair Otto called the meeting back to order,
and called the next public speaker.
Raja Bamrungpong, 13963 Stagecoach Trail; Moorpark, CA
93021
Mr. Bamrungpong stated that he resides in the area, and had
moved from Northridge because Moorpark has a nice quiet
family environment. He further stated that he enjoyed
Moorpark but had concerns with the project, including
potential traffic increase on Miller Parkway, public
safety, noise level and aesthetics.
S: \Community Development \Everyone\ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES \020211 -pcm is review.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Meeting Minutes of February 11, 2002
Page 7
Commissioner Parvin asked Mr. Bamrungpong if he had
knowledge that this project was planned when he purchased
his home, to which he replied yes.
Chair Otto closed the public hearing at 9:17 p.m.
Chair Otto invited discussion from the Commission, which
included:
• Los Angeles Avenue: increase in stacking ability by
lengthening of westbound turn lane recommended.
• Overhang of parking: Acceptable, as sufficient
walkway space is provided so that vehicles will not
encroach on pedestrian traffic. Preference is a
decorative sidewalk rather than asphalt.
• Use of the Caltrans right -of -way: Acceptable,
assuming approvals are given by Caltrans and City
Council.
• Lighting: Preference was increase in height in favor
of fewer fixtures and more energy efficiency.
• Sky lights: Acceptable with appropriate language for
the height and aesthetic appearance.
• Signage: Onsite pylon signs may be acceptable but
thirty -five foot high offsite sign is a concern.
• Retaining wall: Split face block wall with
landscaping preferred.
• Architecture: Suggestions for additional tile
accents, color, and shadowing.
• Theme: Suggestion by Vice -chair Landis to set
Moorpark as being different as to the identity, not
Spanish, more old west.
• Parking: Spaces needed for disabled.
• Art in Public Places: Suggest a dynamic water
feature to draw people.
S: \Community Development \Everyone \PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES \020211 -pcm is review.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Meeting Minutes of February 11, 2002
Page 8
• Pedestrian connection to Cypress Project suggested
to be enhanced.
• Pedestrian access from the corner of Miller Parkway
and Los Angeles Avenue should be strengthened.
• More landscape planters and benches to provide
additional seating.
• Linear appearance of buildings still remain.
Vice -chair Landis returned during this time in the meeting
(9:24 p.m.) .
After further discussion, the Planning Commission reached
consensus on the following condition modifications and
recommendations to the City Council.
• Delete Condition No. 52 previously included for the
Commercial Planned Development. (The condition was
not applicable to the project)
• Retain condition of approval requiring length of New
Los Angeles Avenue westbound left -turn lane to be
260 feet.
• Parking overhang of two feet into pedestrian
walkways, as shown on site plan, is acceptable and
consistent with intent of parking regulations,
because sufficient width of walkway is maintained.
• Retain condition of approval requiring fifty (50 %)
percent tree canopy shade coverage at fifty (50 %)
percent maturity.
• Recommend to City Council that Chapter 17.30 of the
Zoning Code or Ordinance No. 195 (Carlsberg Specific
Plan Zoning) be amended to allow a 25 -foot light
pole height and an approximately two -inch drop -down
lens and consider a greater than 7:1 maximum
lighting ratio for the property site.
• Recommend landscaping within Caltrans right -of -way
along New Los Angeles Avenue as meeting intent of
site frontage landscaping requirements.
S: \Community Development \Everyone \PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES \020211 -pcm is review.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Meeting Minutes of February 11, 2002
Page 9
• Recommend to City Council that the Carlsberg
Specific Plan be amended to allow pylon signs and an
offsite pylon sign for the proposed commercial
center, consistent with sizes and locations as
proposed by the applicant. Also recommend that a
Master Sign Program be approved as amended to
specifically prohibit wall signs on the south
elevation (wall signage on the west side of Target
and north site of Kohl's was recommended to be
permitted) .
• Allow limited skylights if needed for energy
conservation and if determined to be aesthetically
acceptable. The intent is to avoid the unattractive
roof appearance of several industrial buildings in
Moorpark as viewed from the higher freeway
elevation.
• Recommend that applicant study pedestrian access to
the site from the corner of New Los Angeles Avenue
and Miller Parkway and incorporate a pedestrian
access way if safety and liability are not issues
(if handicapped accessibility compliance can be
achieved) .
• Revise condition of approval for additional
architectural detail for buildings to specifically
require additional architectural shade and shadowing
techniques to include additional paint coloring for
all building elevations, additional trim detail for
rear and sides of buildings, and a projecting
trellis canopy for the west side of the Target
building.
• Add to the conceptual landscape plans additional
landscaping in the pedestrian walkways and adjacent
to buildings and increase seating opportunities.
• Revise condition of approval to specify that the
easterly retaining wall will incorporate wheat -
colored, split -faced block (consistent with proposed
wall material for south property line wall).
Additional landscape planting areas to be
incorporated at the base of the retaining wall to
S: \Community Development \Everyone \PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES \020211 -pcm is review.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Meeting Minutes of February 11, 2002
Page 10
extent permitted by Fire Protection District to
maintain access requirements.
• Revise condition of approval to require artwork to
be provided onsite consistent with City Council
requirements for art in public places approval
(versus allowing payment of in -lieu fee).
• Recommend to City Council that project architect's
design for the Target building elevations be
retained (the changes to the building elevations
made by Target's architect, including change to
tower elements, were not found to be acceptable).
• Maintain pedestrian circulation between industrial
and commercial properties and potential for future
City bus access.
MOTION: Commissioner DiCecco moved and Commissioner Haller
seconded a motion to approve staff recommendation to adopt
Resolution No. PC- 2002 -420 recommending to the City Council
approval of Commercial Planned Development No. 2001 -01 and
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5321, subject to Conditions
of Approval revised as noted; recommend that the City
Council direct the Planning Commission to initiate study of
modifications to Chapter 17.30 of the Zoning Ordinance
and /or Ordinance No. 195 related to lighting; and recommend
that the City Council direct the Planning Commission to
initiate study of amendment of the Carlsberg Specific Plan
related to signage.
Motion carried 4:1 voice vote, Vice -chair Landis voting no.
9. DISCUSSION ITEMS:
A) Consider amendment to Resolution No. PC -99 -373
regarding Rules of Procedure for Commission
Meetings and Related Functions and Activities.
Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. PC-
2002- amending. Resolution No. PC -99 -373.
Consensus was reached that Section 4.1 Decorum and
Order paragraph (a) should read "Any Commissioner
S: \Community Development \Everyone \PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES \020211 -pcm is review.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Meeting Minutes of February 11, 2002
Page 11
desiring to speak shall address the Presiding Officer
and, upon recognition by the Presiding Officer, shall
confine himself /herself to the item under debate."
Consensus was reached that in Section 2.8 Public
Hearings, that an applicant's initial presentation
shall remain at thirty (30) minutes.
MOTION: Vice -chair Landis moved and Commissioner
Parvin seconded a motion to approve staff
recommendation to adopt Resolution No. PC- 2002 -421
amending Resolution No. PC -99 -373, with changes as
noted.
Motion carried by unanimous 5:0 voice vote.
B) Consider Schedule of Meeting Dates, Time and
Place for 2002 Planning Commission Meetings.
Staff Recommendation: Direct staff to publish
schedule as deemed appropriate.
By consensus, the Commission determined to retain the
current schedule and start time of 7:00 p.m.
C) Report by Commissioner DiCecco on attendance at
University of Southern California Conference,
"Planning the Post - Sprawl Era: A Gathering of
Leading Thinkers."
Commissioner DiCecco presented a review of the
conference held at University of Southern California
(USC), which was attended by Planners and various city
officials for other agencies.
10) ANNOUNCEMENTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
None.
S: \Community Development \Everyone \PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES \020211 -pcm is review.doc
Planning Commission, City of Moorpark, California
Meeting Minutes of February 11, 2002
Page 12
11) ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION: Chair Otto moved to adjourn the meeting and
Commissioner Parvin seconded the motion.
Motion carried by unanimous 5:0 voice vote.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:43 p.m.
William F. Otto, Chair
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt
Acting Community Development Director
S: \Community Development \Everyone \PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES \020211 -pcm is review.doc
rrEM A.
CITY OF MOORPARK
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable Chair and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Acting Community Development
Director
By: David A. Bobardt, Planning Manager 124
DATE: April 3, 2002 (PC Meeting of April 8, 2002)
SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2002 -1, An Amendment to
Ordinance No. 195 "Carlsberg Specific Plan Land Use
Regulations" and Minor Modification No. 4 to Carlsberg
Specific Plan (SP 92 -1), Regarding Lighting Standards, on
the Application of Zelman Retail Partners, Inc.
BACKGROUND
On March 20, 2002, the City Council approved a Commercial Planned
Development Permit and Vesting Tentative Tract Map for the
construction of a 357,621 square -foot commercial center with 1,429
parking spaces at the southeast corner of New Los Angeles Avenue
and Miller Parkway. As part of the resolution approving these
applications, Council directed the Planning Commission to initiate
study of modifications to Chapter 17.30 of the Zoning Ordinance
and /or Ordinance No. 195 related to revisions to lighting
standards. This action responded to a recommendation of the
Planning Commission to allow 25 -foot high light poles with drop -
down lenses and lighting values in excess of 7 foot - candles for
this project.
DISCUSSION
This staff report focuses on an amendment to Ordinance No. 195 as
previously discussed by the Planning Commission to address lighting
issues specific to the approved commercial center in the Carlsberg
Specific Plan area and respond to an application filed on March 26,
2002 by Zelman Retail Partners, Inc. The applicant is requesting
the amendment to Ordinance No. 195 to allow for the use of lighting
poles 25 feet in height, lenses that drop down about two inches
below the fixtures, and lighting values up to 8.2 foot - candles.
Potential amendments to Chapter 17.30 of the Moorpark Municipal
Planning Commission Staff Report ZOA 2002 -1, Minor Mod. 4
April 8, 2002
Applicant: Zelman Retail Partners, Inc.
Page No. 2
Code (Lighting Regulations) will be studied and presented to the
Planning Commission in the future as directed by Council.
Existing Code Standards
Comprehensive lighting regulations are contained in Chapter 17.30
of the Moorpark Municipal Code, attached to this report. Of
particular note for this project are the maximum height of lighting
poles for commercial uses (20 feet) , the maximum light value for
exterior parking areas (7 foot - candles), and the requirement that
lights be shielded or recessed to direct glare and reflections
within the boundaries of the property.
Specific Plan Regulations
Ordinance No. 195, adopted on September 21, 1994, contains
development standards for the Carlsberg Specific Plan area,
including the (SR /C) Sub - Regional Retail /Commercial overlay zone,
where the project is located. Details or issues not specifically
covered in these regulations are subject to the regulations of the
City of Moorpark Zoning Code. In areas of conflict between the
City's zoning regulations and these provisions, the Specific Plan
takes precedence.
The Carlsberg Specific Plan development standards for the (SR /C)
Sub - Regional Retail /Commercial overlay zone establish minimum
setbacks, maximum building heights, and minimum site landscaping
requirements. Lighting is one of the issues not addressed by
Ordinance No. 195, and therefore is regulated by Chapter 17.30 of
the Moorpark Municipal Code.
Assessment of Proposed Lighting Plan
The conceptual lighting plan is not consistent with certain
elements of Chapter 17.30 (Lighting Regulations) of the Municipal
Code. The applicant is proposing 82 lighting poles in the parking
lot at 25 feet in height, lenses that drop down about two inches
below the fixtures, and lighting values up to 8.2 foot - candles
(maintained brightness).
Given the large size of the parking lot, the number of 25 -foot high
light poles needed to light the parking areas is substantially less
than the number of light poles needed if the poles were set at 20
feet in height, allowing for increased landscaping. According to
the applicant, a plan with 20 -foot high poles would require 152
poles to achieve similar lighting performance.. The higher
placement of the light fixtures provides more even distribution of
S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \PC 020408 ZOA2002 -1 Zelman
Lighting Rptl.doc
Planning Commission Staff Report ZO
April 8, 2002
Applicant: Zelman Retail Partners,
Page No. 3
light in the parking lot. Finally,
is compatible with the scale of the
with typical building heights of 23
A 2002 -1, Minor Mod. 4
Inc.
the use of 25 -foot high poles
architecture in this project,
to 31 feet.
The placement of lighting fixtures on higher poles could, however,
increase the potential for off -site light spillover. In order to
evaluate this potential, the City retained Tom Doyle, Chief
Electrical Engineer of Dahl, Taylor and Associates to provide an
expert opinion on the lighting proposal (attached). Mr. Doyle's
conclusion is that light cut off at the property line is at an
acceptable level. In addition, the parking lot varies from
approximately the same grade as New Los Angeles Avenue to 32 feet
below grade. Most of the light poles on the eastern half of the
project site would be less than 20 feet above the street grade.
The drop -down lens proposed is an integral component of the
proposed lighting fixtures. These lighting fixtures are a high -
quality lighting product compatible with the architecture of the
project. The lamp itself is recessed, but the lens drops about two
inches below the shield. Review of this proposed lens also
indicates that it would not contribute to off -site glare.
The request to exceed the lighting values contained in the Zoning
Code was also independently reviewed by Mr. Doyle. His conclusion
is that it is reasonable for a commercial site to have an average
lighting value of between 3.0 and 6.0 foot - candles (The average on
this proposal is 3.63 foot - candles). It should be noted that these
lighting values represent those values expected over the long -term
maintenance of the project. According to Mr. Doyle, it is standard
practice in the industry to measure lighting as it would be
expected over time, with a 28 percent drop from initial brightness,
due to environmental effects on lamps, reflectors, and lenses, as
well as factory tolerances on lamps and ballast units.
As stated before the Planning Commission on February 11, 2002, it
is staff's opinion that a change to the maximum fixture height is
justified. This is based on the lower elevation of the site when
viewed from New Los Angeles Avenue and the need to decrease the
number of light poles and increase the number of trees in the
parking lot areas to achieve greater tree canopy coverage. The
drop -down lens is also within the intent of the Zoning Code and is
not expected to result in off -site glare. The lighting values are
reasonable for a retail commercial center. Conditions have been
added to the attached resolution for the Minor Modification to the
Specific Plan that would ensure that the project meets the
standards proposed in the Zoning Ordinance Amendment.
S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \PC 020408 ZOA2002 -1 Zelman
Lighting Rptl.doc
Planning Commission Staff Report ZOA 2002 -1, Minor Mod. 4
April 8, 2002
Applicant: Zelman Retail Partners, Inc.
Page No. 4
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This proposed commercial center is consistent with the Amended
Carlsberg Specific Plan for which an EIR was certified. No further
review is necessary.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Open the public hearing, accept public testimony, discuss
issues identified in the staff report, and close the public
hearing.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2002- recommending to the City
Council approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -1 and
Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan,
subject to conditions of approval.
Attachments:
1. Letter from Mr. Tom Doyle
2. Draft Resolution with Conditions of Approval
Under Separate Cover:
3. Ordinance 195
4. Chapter 17.30 of the Moorpark Municipal Code
5. Photometric Study (Initial)
6. Photometric Study (Maintained)
7. Site Details
8. Lighting Specifications
S: \Community Development \Everyone \Planning Commission Agenda Reports \PC 020408 ZOA2002 -1 Zelman
Lighting Rptl.doc
4 -03 -202 2:49PM FROM DAHL TAYLOR ASSOC 9492619778 P.1
Dahl, Taylor & Associates, In(.
;pro mod. Hec�ncd S ZMuc!uel rnpea�s
www.dohltoy of.com
engineering @dohltoylor.com
Hoyword
Los Angeles
San Diego
Sonia Ana
April 3, 2002
Mr. Dave Bobardt
Planning Manager
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re: Moorpark Marketplace Preliminary Assessment
# of pages:6
Dear Mr. Bobardt:
The following is my preliminary assessment of the photometric drawings and data that was
delivered to Dahl, Taylor & Associates on April 2, 2002. These drawings are a revision to a
previously delivered set and are a result of our conference call with the developer and
architect on March 28, 2002.
General:
• These revised drawings are comprised of two different drawings. The first calculates
initial foot - candle levels by using a light loss factor (LLF) of 1.00. The second calculates
maintained foot - candle levels by using the 0.72 LLF. For the record, the LLF indicates
degradation of the foot - candle level over time in an installation due to depreciating
lamp output, dirt buildup, and material degradation. The number 0.72 is an industry
standard for the LLF.
Light Spill:
• The analysis shows acceptable cut off per the City's requirements on all sides of the
property. On the north, west, and south sides, there are probably existing light fixtures
that will add to the overall footcandle levels. It appears that the East side is where light
cutoff is more critical. With the reduced 250 -watt fixture, acceptable light cut off has
been achieved at that property line.
Drop Down Lenses:
• The proposed fixtures have a lens that does drop down below the sides of the fixture.
However:
a) The lamp itself is still recessed so the fixture would not be a glare problem that the
City's requirements forbid.
b) The lens drop is minimal and is part of the style of the fixture.
Fixture Height:
• The fixtures do not meet the City's requirement of maximum height of twenty feet for
commercial properties. However, that rule does break down a little when you are
dealing with a property of this size for the following reasons:
• The quantity of poles needs to go up to meet the footcandle requirements. To avoid
large differences between maximum and minimum foot - candles, you need more
poles with less lumens per pole.
• Poles that are much shorter or much taller than the building involved appear out of
proportion. The twenty -five foot pole in this case is approximately the height of the
building and would look acceptable.
ATTACHMENT Z
4 -03 -202 2:50PM FROM DAHL TAYLOR ASSOC 9492619778
Dahl, Taylor & Associates, Inc.
Footcandle Levels:
• During our conference call, I asked for the initial photometric drawing so that if and
when this installation is complete, the City and l (plus the contractor) could verify the
numbers with a photometer and require the contractor to correct any discrepancies
outside of some percentage like 10 %. Attached is a simple explanation why the actual
installation can be up to 12.5% different than the design. The more important issue is
the maintained analysis.
• Regarding the maintained photometric analysis:
a) It is reasonable for a commercial site to have an average of between 3.0 and 6.0
footcandles. A maximum of 8.2 foot - candles is not too far off the City's 7.0
maximum foot - candle requirement.
b) Retailers want a well -lit parking lot. One of the reasons that I don't think has been
brought up is that retailers want to be brighter than their neighbors. I remember
reading that when given a choice, shoppers go to the brighter parking lot. I will look
for that article.
c) The "brightness" that people will see will be from the reflected objects such as cars.
Please call with questions or comments.
Sincerely,
DAHL, TAYLOR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
6
Tom Doyle, PE bate
Chief Electrical Engineer
www.dohltoy or.com
engineering@dohitaAor.com
Hayward
Los Angeles
San Diego
Headquarters
Santa Ana 2960 Daimler Street Santa Ana, CA 92705 -5824 949.756.8654 FAX.261.9778
P. 2
4 -03 -202 2:50PM FROM DAHL TAYLOR ASSOC 9492619778
Understanding
Outdoor Area
L ighting Design
A wide range
of solutions can
meet the diverse
needs of site
illumination.
P. 3
Floodlight on pole
O�
s
m
Shadow area
0
Building
�--- D2 -2H
D, =2 amounting height
Fig. 1. Length of shadow is directly proportional to the height of the luminaire
and the distance from the base of the pole. for a horizontal distance equal to
twice the luminaire mounting height, the shadow will be twice the height of the
shadow - casting object.
By Joseph R. Knisley, Senior Editorial Consultant
roperly preparing a lighting design for outdoor loading, storage, and
fabricating areas is usually a difficult task. The lighting designer must
consider whether stacked materials or heavy machinery will interfere with
light distribution, or whether work activities will obstruct or block some
of the light distribution.
Picking fighting equipment for the job is sometimes more difficult with
an outdoor installation than with an indoor area, because fewer fixtures
contribute their light to a given area. Generally, this means there's little
margin for error in an outdoor lighting design (see sidebar on page 30).
Aldiough you can install lighting equipment on any high structure, pole
mounting offers the most versatility. Luminaires on poles can provide
illumination in every direction at distances of two to two and half times the
28 October2000 • EC &M • www.electricalzone.com
l
J
4 -03 -202 2:51PM
FROM DAHL TAYLOR ASSOC 9492619778
mounting height from the pole.
Thus, luminaires on a singe pole
can serve an area of abotit four times
the mounting height— squared. For
example, a 50 -ft Ex)le can cover
about 40,0 Q10 sq ft and a 150 -ft File
about 364.LW kl ft. You can use
narrow beam floodlights to light a
flat area extending to five times the
mounting height from the pole.
1 iowever. at distances greater than
two times the mounting height,
unifonnity and system efficiency
drop off considerably.
You can see the effectiveness of
minimizing shadows with a given
mounting height in Fig. 1, on page
28. This figure shows that the rela-
tionship between the length ofshad-
ows and the luminaire mounting
height foll,)ws the law of similar
triangles. For a horizontal distance
from the pole of twice the mount -
inc height, the length of the shadow
will be Twice the height of the ob-
ject eastinu the shadow.
Once you establish the luminaire
locations and mounting heights, de-
termine the quantity and type of
luminaire. If you select tall poles,
Fig. 2. These six beam spreads serve most floodlighting needs. The effective
projection distances of each type are also given. A beam edge is defined as 10%
of maximum candlepower.
you can use higher wattage lamps,
which are more efficient than lower
wattage light sources. Generally,
1000W or 750W high- pressure so-
dium (HN, ) or metal - halide (MH)
lamps are the choice for high mast
when using software, a contractor might find that Otec,the installavon,
the "measured: illuminance differs from the corri' icted:flJumi-
nonce. -Why? A number of factors may cause this. V' n+aUon. First;of all,
site conditions frequently vary from the assumptions used in preparing
the design.
Then, consider that a lamp can vary t 5% in light output and still be
within the manufacturer's tolerances. An HID ballast can vary ± 7% and .
still be within tolerance. Thus, it's possible for a lamp/ballast combination
to be 12.5% under the predicted output.
You may find that the installerskewed the lamp's arc tube or mounted
the fixture slightly out of alignment— resulting in the distribution of light
at angles other than those intended.
Another factor could be a reflector or a refractor also mounted slightly
off axis, producing similar results, it takes only a few degrees of tilt to
produce significant change in the light distribution pattern.
Low voltage at the ballast of the fixtures could also be a problem,
resulting from excessive voltage drop in the feeder :or branch - circuit
conductors. A regulator -type ballast is available for such a situation.
applications.
In addition to choosing the lamp
t}'pe, wattage, and number and lo-
cation of luminaires, a designer must
Picking Lighting
equipment for
the job is
sometimes more
difficult with an
outdoor installation
than with an indoor
area, because fewer
fixtures contribute
their fight to
a given area.
consider the beam spread, or the
`,tndlepower distribution pattern
the luminaire provides. High mast
luminaires and floodlights offer
svinmetrical and :isvinmetricA
be.un sprea, Is. Narurally. a hi,h nutst
4 -03 -202 2 : 52PM FROM OAF -IL TAYLOR AOS 0�.92C 1 `? I % �' S
r
YV
luminaire delivers most of its light
directly downward. But, you can
vary the beam spread of a high rriast
luminaire by vertically adjusting
the lamp in the reflector assembly.
You can also select reflector - /re-
fractor -type units, which cast light
at a high angle. When you rotate
the optical assembly of an asym-
metrical -beam, a high mast
luminaire allows you to shape the
distribution pattern of a cluster of
these luminaires.
Typically installed on structures
and low poles, floodlights have a
circular reflector, with the lamp
mounted in the center. Floodlight
beam spreads and their effective
projection distances are classified
by a joint IES/NEMA designation.
The beam- spread patterns extend
from Type 1 to Type 7. Fig. 2, on
page 30, shows Type 2 to Type 7
beam patterns, which are the most
widely used types. In all cases, as the
distance from floodlight to the illu-
minated area increases, the beam
spread becomes wider.
Type classification assumes a
symmetrical beam shape, meaning
that the beam spread angle in the
vertical and horizontal axes are
identical. Generally narrow pro-
jection beams (Type 1, 2, 3, and 4),
which are useful for directing a long
throw of light, have a symmetrical
beam spread. However, outdoor
floodlights with Type 5, b, and 7
beam spread have different beam
spread for the vertical and horizon-
tal axes, since they're generally used
to project their light output at me-
dium to close distances.
You can use the following simple
formula to rapidly figure the num-
ber of units needed for a given light
level or to determine the light level
provided by a certain number of
fixtures.
fC
(N) (BL) (U F) (M F)
Area
where,
fc = average maintained illumi-
nation level in footcandles
Fig. 3. lsofootcandle curves show light pattern and light levels produced by
particular luminaire. Information is presented in terms of mounting height an
distance from the pole.
N = number of luminaires
BL = beam lumens of the
luminaire
LT = utilization factor (percent-
age of the beam lumens that fall
withir► the area being lighted)
MF =maintenance factor (light
loss factor)
Area = area to be lighted in
square feet or square meters.
If the lighting project must sat-
isfy only general criteria, such a
simple calculation is sufficient.
However, a better method of de-
signing an outdoor lighting system
is to use an isofootcandle plot.
An isof(x)rcandle plot graphi-
cally represents the light distribu-
tion pattern on a horizontal sur-
face. The graph consists of a series
of lines, or contours, that represent
the same illuminance anywhere on
the line, with each line represent-
ing a different footcandle. Each
32 October 2000 • EC &M • www.electricalzone.com
contour from the center out repre-
sents approximately 50% of the
value of the previous contour. The
plot is placed over a grid, which
you can use to indicate mounting
height divisions. An isofootcandle
plot can vary in shape from a circle,
oval, or triangle, and may be sym-
metrical or asymmetrical (see Fig.
3, above).
Essentially, you can use an
isofootcandle curve at the same
scale as a plan view of the area to be
lighted to determine the contri-
bution of each luminaire to the
entire area.
Today, manufacturers have pow-
erful and relatively inexpensive
software programs to perform these
calculations. Many of these pro-
grants perform lighting design cal-
culations based on isofootcandle
curves and footcandle tables for
each luminaire type. E'ICaM
Circle 72 on Reader Service Card
RESOLUTION NO. PC -2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO
THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ZONING ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT NO. 2002 -1 AND MINOR MODIFICATION NO.
4 TO THE CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN SP 92 -1
REGARDING LIGHTING STANDARDS FOR AN
APPROXIMATELY 29 -ACRE SITE ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF NEW LOS ANGELES AVENUE AND MILLER
PARKWAY, ON THE APPLICATION OF ZELMAN RETAIL
PARTNERS, INC. (ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 512- 0 -260-
015, 085, AND 105)
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed Public Hearing on April 8, 2002,
the Planning Commission considered Zoning Ordinance Amendment
No. 2002 -1 and Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg
Specific Plan SP 92 -1 regarding lighting standards for an
approximately 29 -acre site on the southeast corner of New Los
Angeles Avenue and Miller Parkway, on the application of Zelman
Retail Partners, Inc. (Assessor Parcel No. 512 -0- 260 -015, 085,
and 105); and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is more specifically
described as follows:
Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -1: A request for a
change to Ordinance No. 195 "Carlsberg Specific Plan Land
Use Regulations" by adding lighting requirements to allow
for 25 -foot high light poles, drop -down lenses, and light
values up to 8.2 foot - candles;
Minor Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan 92-
1: A request for a change to the Specific Plan to permit
25 -foot high light poles, drop -down lenses, and light
values up to 8.2 foot - candles; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting of April 8, 2002, the Planning
Commission conducted a public hearing, received public
testimony, and reached a decision.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the Planning Commission does hereby find
that Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -1 and Minor
Modification No. 4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan 92 -1 are
S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \pc 020408 reso cond zoa 2002 -01
zelman.doc
Modified: 04/04/02 ATTACHMENT 2..
RESOLUTION NO. PC -2002-
ZOA 2002 -1, MINOR MOD.4 to SP 92 -1
Page 2
consistent with the City's General Plan and the Carlsberg
Specific Plan 92 -1 and that the proposed modifications will not
materially affect the overall purpose and intent of the Specific
Plan.
SECTION 2. That the Planning Commission further finds that
Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -1 and Minor Modification No.
4 to the Carlsberg Specific Plan 92 -1 are consistent with the
Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Specific Plan.
SECTION 3. That the Planning Commission recommends to the
City Council approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2002 -1
(Exhibit A). -
SECTION 4. That the Planning Commission recommends to the
City Council approval of Minor Modification No. 4 to the
Carlsberg Specific Plan 92 -1 (Exhibit B), subject to conditions
of approval (Exhibit C).
The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2002.
William F. Otto, Chair
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt
Acting Community Development Director
EXHIBITS:
A. Draft Ordinance Amending Sections 8119 -5.4 and 8119 -6.5 of
Ordinance No. 195
B. Amended Language to Chapter IV, Development Standards,
Specific Plan 92 -1
C. Draft Conditions of Approval
S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \pc 020408 reso cond zoa 2002 -01
zelman.doc
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 8119 -5.4 AND
8119 -6.5 OF ORDINANCE NO. 195 "CARLSBERG
SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE REGULATIONS" RELATED TO
SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE SUB - REGIONAL
RETAIL /COMMERCIAL AND BUSINESS PARK ZONES OF
THE CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that a need exists
to provide adequate standards and regulations concerning
exterior lighting in the Carlsberg Specific Plan Sub - Regional
Retail /Commercial and Business Park zones; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires that standards and
regulations affecting exterior lighting are necessary to ensure
the public health, safety and welfare within the various
neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public
hearing on April 8, 2002, adopted Resolution PC -2002-
recommending that the City Council consider and adopt the
amendment to Ordinance No. 195 as contained in Exhibit A to that
resolution; and
Whereas, the City Council on 1 2002 conducted a
public hearing, took public testimony, closed the hearing, and
reached its decision.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 8119 -5.4 of Ordinance No. 195 "Site
Development Standards (Sub - Regional Retail /Commercial
Zone)" is amended by adding subsection "e" as follows:
Sec. 8119 -5.4 - Site Development Standards
e. Lighting:
1) Light poles in the parking areas shall not exceed
25 feet in height measured from the ground to the
top of the light fixture. All other exterior
light poles shall conform to standards of the
Moorpark Municipal Code.
EXHIBIT
Ordinance No.
Page 2
2) Drop -down lenses not to exceed two inches may be
used in the light fixtures, provided that the
lamps are fully recessed in the fixture to the
satisfaction of the Community Development
Director.
3) Lighting values in the parking areas shall not
exceed 8.2 foot - candles under a normally -
maintained condition.
4) All other lighting regulations contained in the
Moorpark Municipal Code shall apply.
SECTION 2. Section 8119 -6.5 of Ordinance No. 195 "Site
Development Standards (Business Park Zone)" is amended by
adding subsection "h" as follows:
Sec. 8119 -6.5 - Site Development Standards
h. Lighting:
1) Light poles in the parking areas shall not exceed
25 feet in height measured from the ground to the
top of the light fixture. All other exterior
light poles shall conform to standards of the
Moorpark Municipal Code.
2) Drop -down lenses not to exceed two inches may be
used in the light fixtures, provided that the
lamps are fully recessed in the fixture to the
satisfaction of the Community Development
Director.
3) Lighting values in the parking areas shall not
exceed 8.2 foot - candles under a normally -
maintained condition.
4) All other lighting regulations contained in the
Moorpark Municipal Code shall apply.
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
\ \MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \cc 020501 ZOA2002 -1
zelman.doc
Modified: 04/04/02
Ordinance No.
Page 3
remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares
that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more section,
subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be
declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30)
days after its passage and adoption.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of
original ordinances of said City; shall make a minute of the
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of
the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and
shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption
thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark Star
a newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section 6008 of
the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is hereby
designated for that purpose.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
2002.
\ \MOR_PRI_SERV \City Share \Community Development \Everyone \Ordinances \cc 020501 ZOA2002 -1
zelman.doc
Modified: 04/04/02
EXHIBIT B
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2002-
Minor Modification No. 4 to SP -92 -1
Subsection F.4. (Page 56), Sub - Regional Retail /Commercial (SR /C)
Site Development Standards, of Chapter IV Development Standards
of the Carlsberg Specific Plan dated September 7, 1994, are
amended by adding the following language:
e. Lighting:
1) Light poles in the parking areas shall not exceed -
25 feet in height measured from the ground to the
top of the light fixture. All other exterior
light poles shall conform to standards of the
Moorpark Municipal Code.
2) Drop -down lenses not to exceed two inches may be
used in the light fixtures, provided that the
lamps are fully recessed in the fixture to the
satisfaction of the Community Development
Director.
3) Lighting values in the parking areas shall not
exceed 8.2 foot - candles under a normally -
maintained condition.
4) All other lighting regulations contained in the
Moorpark Municipal Code shall apply.
Subsection G.4. (Page 59), Business Park (BP) Site Development
Standards, of Chapter IV Development Standards of the Carlsberg
Specific Plan dated September 7, 1994, are amended by adding the
following language:
g. Lighting:
1) Light poles in the parking areas shall not exceed
25 feet in height measured from the ground to the
top of the light fixture. All other exterior
light poles shall conform to standards of the
Moorpark Municipal Code.
2) Drop -down lenses not to exceed two inches may be
used in the light fixtures, provided that the
S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 020408 Reso zoa 2002 -01 Zelman
EXHIBIT B.doc
Modified: 04/04/02
lamps are fully recessed in the fixture to the
satisfaction of the Community Development
Director.
3) Lighting values in the parking areas shall not
exceed 8.2 foot - candles under a normally -
maintained condition.
4) All other lighting regulations contained in the
Moorpark Municipal Code shall apply.
S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 020408 Reso zoa 2002 -01 Zelman
EXHIBIT B.doc
RESOLUTION NO. PC -2002-
ZOA 2002 -1, MINOR MOD A to SP 92 -1
EXHIBIT C
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 4 TO THE
CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 92 -1)
1. The parking lot lighting for the commercial center shall be
constructed in substantial conformance with the photometric
study plans and light specifications received by the City of
Moorpark on April 2, 2002.
2. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the actual
photometric numbers shall be measured in the field by the City
at the applicant's expense. Any discrepancy in excess of 10
percent from the lighting values shown on the plans shall be
corrected to the satisfaction of the Community Development
Director prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
3. No changes to any of the specified light poles, light
fixtures, lamps, or ballast units shall be made without prior
approval by the Community Development Director.
S: \Community Development \Everyone \Resolutions and Conditions \PC 020408 Cond zoa 2002 -01 Zelman
EXHIBIT C.doc
Modified: 04/04/02
ORDINANCE NO. 195
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 189 TO AL,-) ARTICLE 19
"CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE REGULATI04S"
Whereas, Carlsberg Financial Corporation has filed an
application with the City of Moorpark for an amendment to the
adopted Carlsberg Specific Plan regulating development of an
approximate 488.4 acre landholding located west of the Moorpark
Freeway (SR23), east of Spring Road, north of Tierra Rejada Road,
and south of New Los Angeles Avenue in the City of Moorpark; and
Whereas, the Draft EIR, Zoning Ordinance Amendment and
Amendments to the Specific Plan were considered by the Planning
Commission and City Council at several public meetings and the City
Council public hearing was closed on November 10, 1993; and
Whereas, on August 3, 1994, the City Council directed
staff to prepare an Ordinance which reflects the issues considered
by the Planning Commission and City Council at the duly noticed
public hearings, in order to amend the City's Zoning Regulations
for the purpose of adopting the amended Land Use Regulations of the
Specific Plan as Zoning for the property; and
Whereas, on September 7,r 19 9 4 , the City Council Certified
the Environmental Impact report for and approved the amendments to
the Carlsberg Specific Plan; and
Whereas, the changes to the Zoning and the Zoning
Ordinance as directed by the City Council are for the benefit of
the health and welfare of the citizens of Moorpark.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the modifications to the Zoning
designation of the property described in the Amended Carlsberg
Specific Plan have been studied in the Amended Carlsberg Specific
Plan Subsequent EIR. The Subsequent Environmental Impact Report
was certified by the City Council on September 7, 1994. The
amendments to the Zoning designation are described in attachment
"A" to this Ordinance.
SECTION 2. That the modifications to the City's Zoning
Ordinance are categorically exempt pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3).
PP08:18:94 /10:27amAt \ORD
ATTACHMENT 3
J
SECTION 3. That the Current Zoning Ordinance No. 189 is
hereby amended by adding Article 19 entitled "Carlsberg Specific
Plan Land Use Regulations" as enumerated in Section 4 are hereby
adopted.
SECTION 4. ARTICLE 19
CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE REGULATIONS
Sec. 8119 -0 - PURPOSE AND INTENT - The purpose of these regulations
is to act as the controlling mechanism of the implementation of
development within the Carlsberg Specific Plan area.
Implementation of the standards set forth in this section will
ensure that future development proceeds in a coordinated manner
consistent with the goals and policies of the Carlsberg Specific
Plan and the City of Moorpark General Plan. Future review of site
plans and other necessary discretionary approvals by the City of
Moorpark will ensure the realization of these standards.
The following standards apply to development of all residential,
business park, commercial, institutional and open space areas. All
such development shall conform to the development standards as set
forth in the specific plan for the permitted uses.
It is recognized that certain development standards generally
included as conditions of approval on development permit approvals
may not be contained in the City's existing Zoning Ordinance or
Subdivision Ordinance. Such items include but are not limited to:
onsite lighting standards; fixtures, lumin levels, coverage
mounting and pole height; street lighting standards; front yard
landscaping; bus shelters; private recreational areas for
residential projects; quantities and sizing of trees and shrubs;
general review /approval of landscaping and irrigation plans; review
and approval of conditions, covenants and restrictions;
requirements for homeowner /property associations; wall and fence
style, location and height; rain gutters; yard drains; trash and
recycling enclosures; slough wall for slopes adjacent to street
rights -of -way and concrete driveways. The City may, at its
discretion, condition any subdivision and /or development permit on
all such matters.
The City zoning ordinance and /or subdivision ordinance shall have
effect on all areas, except as specified by the standards contained
herein. As the development standards of the Specific Plan are
adopted by ordinance, in any areas of conflict between the City's
zoning ordinance and /or subdivision ordinance and these provisions,
this Specific Plan shall control. Where the Specific Plan does not
address development standards or provisions, the city's zoning
ordinance and /or subdivision ordinance shall control. Any future
amendments to the city zoning ordinance and /or subdivision
ordinance which are not addressed by the Specific Plan or existing
PP08 :28:94120 :27&MA : \0RD
Zoning and /or Subdivision Ordinance shall also apply to thy:
specific plan area as applicable.
Sec. 8119 -1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS - Terms used in these regulations
shall have the same definitions as given in the City of Moorpark
Zoning Code unless otherwise defined herein. Because it ig
infeasible to compose language which encompasses all conceivable
situations, the Director of Community Development shall have the
power to interpret the regulations and standards contained in the
ordinance, when such interpretation is necessitated by a lack of
specificity in such regulations and standards.
a. Any details or issues not specifically covered in these
regulations shall be subject to the regulations of the
City of Moorpark Zoning Code.
b. These regulations are adopted pursuant to Section 65450
et seq. of the State of California Government Code. It
is specifically intended by such adoption that the
development standards herein shall regulate all develop-
ment within the Specific Plan area.
C. All construction and development within the Specific Plan
area shall comply with applicable provisions of the
Uniform Building Code as amended and the various other
mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire codes related
thereto, as well as the City's standards for public
improvements in effect at the time of construction of
each public improvement.
d. Grading plans submitted for all projects in the Specific
Plan area shall be based on the city grading ordinance
and shall be accompanied by geological and soils
engineer's reports which shall incorporate all recommen-
dations as deemed appropriate by the City Engineer. The
soils engineer and engineering geologist must certify the
suitability of a graded site prior to issuance of a
building permit. The final grading plan as it reflects
development in the specific plan area shall be approved
by the City Engineer.
e. Planning Areas are defined as each land use area depicted
in Exhibit 7, Land Use Plan.
f. All landscape and /or grading plans shall include provi-
sions for temporary erosion control on all graded sites
which are scheduled to remain unimproved during the
winter months consistent with the applicable City
requirements.
g. All setbacks are measured from the property line.
Page - 3 - 2/94
Sec. 8119 -2 - GENERAL STANDARDS
Sec. 8119 -2.1 - Screening - The following standards shall
apply to all development except for single family
detached subdivisions, which shall be exempt from
screening:
a. Parking areas abutting street: A screen such as a
hedge, wall or berm, or other similar structure
shall be installed along all parking areas abutting
any street. Except as otherwise provided below,
the screening shall have a maximum height of three
and one -half (3 -1/2) feet.
b. Where the finished elevation of the property is
lower than an abutting property or street, appro-
priate landscape screening shall be employed to
screen structures /parking areas.
C. A screen as referred to above shall consist of one
or any combination of the following:
1) Walls, including retaining walls: A wall
shall consist of stone, tile or similar type
of solid masonry material a minimum of eight
(8) inches thick.
2) Berms: A berm shall be constructed of earthen
materials and it shall be landscaped. A berm
shall be a minimum of three (3) feet high.
3) Fences: A fence shall be constructed of
materials having a nominal thickness of one
(1) inch. Wrought iron or chain link fencing
will not be permitted for screening purposes.
(See design guidelines for acceptable
materials.)
d. Mechanical equipment: Roof - mounted mechanical
equipment shall be screened from view with
materials finished to match material and colors in
the roof and building. In some cases screening
from view from freeway, adjacent roadways or
surrounding development may not be practical.
Sec. 8119.2.2 - Landscaping - The following standards shall
apply to all development except, however, single family
detached subdivisions not having common areas shall be exempt.
Landscaping, consisting of evergreen or deciduous trees,
shrubs, or groundcover, shall be installed and permanently
maintained subject to the following conditions and standards:
Page - 4 - 2/91
a. Separation: Any landscaped area shall be separated
from an adjacent vehicular area by a wall or
concrete curb at least six (6) inches higher than
the adjacent vehicular area.
b. All areas to be commonly maintained, as determined
by the City, shall be designated as separate
lettered lots on subdivision maps.
C. Water: Permanent automatic watering facilities
with water sensors shall be provided for all land-
scaped areas. This system may be augmented by
drought- resistant vegetation.
d. Maintenance: All landscaping shall be permanently
maintained in a neat, clean and healthful condi-
tion.
e. Landscape Plan: Prior to the issuance of a build-
ing permit, detailed landscape and irrigation plans
prepared by a registered landscaped architect,
shall be submitted to, reviewed and approved by the
Director of Community Development. The plan shall
provide for substantial screening and breakup of
parking areas, as well as buffering the structural
elevations. Failure to maintain all landscape
materials and irrigation systems in a permanently
healthy and functional manner shall constitute a
violation of the city's zoning ordinance. Upon
completion of the project and prior to the issuance
of a Certificate of Occupancy, the registered
landscape architect shall submit a letter of
certification to the city stating the landscape and
irrigation system have been installed per the
approved plans. All landscape and irrigation
designs shall meet all current city standards and
codes. The detailed landscape plans shall include
the specific palette recommendations and require-
ments for the area. All landscape and irrigation
plans shall incorporate drought - tolerant plant
material and water efficient irrigation systems.
Sec. 8119.3 - SINGLE FAMILY - AREAS A, B and D
Sec. 8119.3.1 - Purpose and Intent - These single family
residential planning areas are intended to provide for the
development and maintenance of medium density residential
neighborhoods offering detached dwelling units. These
regulations allow for a variety of residential uses, and
community facilities and accessory uses which are
complementary to and harmonize with such neighborhoods.
Page - 5 - 2/94
It is the intent of these regulations to set standards which
can be applied in response to individual community needs and
to encourage innovative community design.
This use category allows for a maximum density of 3.7 dwelling
units per gross acre in Planning Area A and 3.0 dwelling units
per gross acre in Planning Areas B and D.
Sec. 8119 -3.2 - Permitted Uses
a. Conventional subdivisions of detached single family
residential dwellings (one dwelling per building
site)
b. Open space uses
C. Public facilities
d. Public utility buildings and structures
e. Public or private parks
Sec. 8119 -3.3 - Conditional Uses (subject to Conditional Use
Permitl
a. Communication, transmitting or relay facilities
b. Churches, temples, and other places of worship
C. Fire and police stations
d. Any other use which the Director of Community
Development finds consistent with the purpose and
intent of this category
Sec. 8119 -3.4 - Accessory Uses and Structures
a. Fences, walls and patios
b. Garages
C. Greenhouses (non - commercial)
d. Private recreation facilities, including but not
limited to passive parks, swimming pools accessory
to a primary residential use, tennis courts, putt-
ing greens, lakes, and trails
e. Other accessory uses which are clearly incidental
to permitted uses and for the exclusive use of
residents of the site.
Page - 6 - 2/94
Sec. 8119 -3.5 - Site Development Standards
a. Height of all buildings: 35 feet maximum measured
from.the grade of the slab.
b. Setbacks measured from property line:
1) Front: 20 feet
2) Side:
a) Interior: 5 feet minimum. For lots over
70 feet in width; sum of side yards must
equal 15 percent of lot width. For the
second story of a dwelling with windows;
10 feet minimum.
b) Exterior: Same as interior lots except
reverse corner lots; 20 feet on street
side.
3) Rear: 20 feet
4) Special:
Area D - Perimeter housing to be built
overlooking Spring Road shall be limited to
one - story; except, two -story construction
shall be permitted provided additional set-
back from top of slope achieves the same
roof profile as one - story with normal set-
back.
C. Minimum lot size: 6,000 square feet
d. Minimum lot width: 65 feet at setback line in Area
D. 55 feet at setback line in
Areas A and B.
e. Parking standards: Pursuant to the City of Moor-
park Zoning Code.
f. Animal Regulations: Same as required for R -1 and
the City's Zoning Ordinance.
Sec. 8119 -4 - SINGLE FAMILY - AREA C
Sec. 8119 -4.1 - Purpose and Intent
Area C residential planning area is intended to provide
for the development and maintenance of higher density
residential neighborhoods offering attached duplex,
Page - 7 - 2/94
detached conventional units or zero lot line patio homes.
These regulations allow for a variety of residential
uses, and community facilities and accessory uses which
are complementary to and harmonize with such neigh-
borhoods.
It is the intent of these regulations to set basic
standards which can be applied in response to individual
community needs and to encourage innovative community
design.
The use category allows for a maximum density of 5.0
dwelling units per acre.
Sec. 8119 -4.2 - Permitted Use
a. Conventional subdivisions, attached duplex and
detached patio /zero lot line single family resi-
dential dwellings (1 or 2 dwellings per building
site)
b. Open space uses
C. Planned Unit Developments (PUD's) including zero -
lot line homes and patio homes.
d. Public facilities
e. Public utility buildings and structures
f. Public or private parks
Sec. 8119 -4.3 - Conditional Uses (subject to Conditional Use
Permit)
a. Communication, transmitting or relay facilities
b. Churches, temples and other places of worship
C. Fire and police stations
d. Any other use which the Director of Community
Development finds consistent with the purpose and
intent of this category.
Sec. 8119 -4.4 - Accessory Uses and Structures
a. Fences, walls and patios
b. Garages
C. Greenhouses (non- commercial)
Page - 8 - 2/94
d. Private recreation facilities, including but not
.limited to passive parks, swimming pools accessory
to a primary residential use, tennis courts, putt-
ing greens, lakes, and trails.
e. Other accessory uses which are clearly incidental
to permitted uses and for the exclusive use of
residents of the site.
Sec. 8119 -A,.5 - Site Development Standards
a. Height of all buildings: 35 feet maximum measured
from the grade of the slab.
b. Setbacks measured from property line:
1)
Front: 20 feet
2) Side:
a) Interior: 5 feet minimum. For lots over
70 feet in width; sum of side yards must
equal 15 percent of lot width. For the
second story of a dwelling with windows;
10 feet minimum.
b) Exterior: Same as interior lots except
reverse corner lots; 20 feet on street
side.
3) Rear: 15 feet
C. Minimum lot size: 4,000 square feet
d. Minimum lot width: 40 feet at setback line
e. Parking standard: Pursuant to Section 9.13.010,
Required Off Street Parking, of the City of Moor-
park Zoning Code.
f. Animal Regulations: Same as for the R -1 residences
in the City's Zoning Ordinance.
Sec. 8119 -5 - SUB - REGIONAL RETAIL /COMMERCIAL (SR /C)
Sec. 8119 -5.1 - Purpose and Intent
The sub - regional retail /commercial overlay area is
intended to provide for a shopping center featuring both
retail and service commercial uses for the convenience of
residents of the development as well as of the
surrounding community.
Page - 9 - 2/94
The physical effects of permitted and conditional uses in
this planning area will be limited so that negative
impacts, such as noise, odor, glare, visual impacts, and
other such effects that could be harmful to life or
nearby property, will not be generated. All permitted
and conditional uses shall be conducted entirely within
a completely enclosed building, and no outdoor storage of
supplies, equipment or materials shall be allowed, except
for company vehicles, garden centers and other similar
uses and as otherwise noted herein.
Sec. 8119 -5.2 - Permitted Uses
a. Business /Commercial Services (eg., office supply
stores, communication services, courier services,
etc.)
b. Civic Uses
C. Commercial Entertainment Uses (eg., theater,
meeting hall or other indoor spectator type uses)
d. Commercial Recreation Uses (eg., miniature golf,
bowling alley, commercial gym)
e. Cultural Uses (eg., museums, art galleries)
f. Educational Uses (eg., public or private schools,
colleges or universities)
g. Food Services, including fast -food and full -
service facilities
h. Minor Repair Service (e.g. T.V. /radio repair)
i. Office Uses (e.g. accounting, barbershop)
J. Personal Services (eg., architectural, doctors,
lawyers, real estate or other professional uses)
k. Photographic Reproduction and Graphic Service
1. Public Safety Uses
M. Religious Uses /offices
n. Retail Sales
o. Any other use which the Director of Community
Development finds consistent with the purpose and
intent of this land use category
Page - 10 - 2/94
Sec. 8119 -5.3 - Accessory Uses and Structures
a. Fences and walls
b. Security and construction and storage offices,
during construction
d. Signs, per the City Zoning Ordinance and an ap-
proved Master Sign Program (see page 18).
e. Accessory structures or uses the Director of Com-
munity Development finds to be consistent with, and
subordinate to, a principal use on the same site.
Sec. 8119 -5.4 - Site Development Standards
a. Height of all buildings: 35 feet (2 stories)
measured from the grade of the slab.
b. Setbacks measured from property line:
1) Front: 30 f,
2) Side:
a) Adjacent to
b) Adjacent to
c) Adjacent to
d) None of the
eet
residential lot - 50 feet
street - 30 feet
alley - 5 feet
above - 0 feet
3) Rear:
a) Adjacent to Residential lot - 50 feet
b) Adjacent to street - 30 feet
c) Adjacent to alley - 5 feet
d) None of the above - 0 feet
C. Parking standards: Pursuant to the City of Moor-
park Zoning Code.
d. Minimum site landscaping: 10 percent.
Page - 11 - 2/9;
Sec. 8119 -6 - BUSINESS PARR (BP)
Sec. 8119 -6.1 - Purpose and Intent
The business park designation is intended to provide for
the development of a wide variety of office, light
industrial /assembly,, research and development and service
uses, which will serve the City of Moorpark and the
surrounding communities. In addition, this land use
category allows a limited amount of business, commercial,
and personal services that directly serve the users and
employees of the business park. The business park is
intended to provide a high quality business environment
which will take advantage of convenient access to the
Moorpark Freeway and New Los Angeles Avenue (SR 118/23).
The physical effects of permitted and conditional uses in
this Planning Area will be limited so that negative
impacts, such as noise, odor, glare, visual impacts, and
other such effects that could be harmful to life or
nearby property, will not be generated. All permitted
and conditional uses shall be conducted entirely within
a completely enclosed building, and no outdoor storage of
supplies, equipment or materials shall be allowed, except
for company vehicles and as otherwise noted herein.
Sec. 8119 -6.2 - Permitted Uses
a. Business /Commercial Services (eg., office supply
stores, communication services, courier services,
etc.*
b. Civic uses
C. Clinical services
d. Food services in conjunction with the principal use
and not open to the public, ie. a cafeteria.
e. Light industrial /assembly uses
f. Office uses
g. Personal services (eg., architectural, doctors,
lawyers, real estate or other professional uses)*
h. Research and development uses
i. Service uses
j. Warehousing and storage uses
Page - 12 - 2/94
k. Wholesaling
1. Any other use which the Director of Community
Development finds consistent with the purpose and
intent of this land use category.
* Business, commercial and personal service uses
combined shall be limited to a total of 50
percent of the gross floor area of structures
in the business park.
Sec. 8119 -6.3 - Conditional Uses ( subject to a Conditional Use
Permitl
a. Commercial recreation uses
b. Educational uses
C. Food services not in conjunction with the principal
use.
d. Minor automotive service
e. Public utilities
f. Religious uses
Sec. 8119 -6.5 - Site Development Standards
a. Height of all buildings: 35 feet measured from the
grade of the slab, however, if the site is to be
utilized by one single user the height limit shall
not exceed 50 feet measured from the grade of the
slab.
b. Setbacks measured from the property line:
1) Front: 20 percent of lot width or depth with
a minimum of 30 feet.
2) Side:
a) Interior: 15 percent of lot width or
depth with a minimum of 30 feet
b) Exterior: 10 percent of lot width or
depth with a minimum of 30 feet
3) Rear: 15 percent of lot width or depth with a
minimum of 10 feet
C. Minimum lot size: 20,000 square feet
d. Minimum lot width: None specified
Page - 13 - 2/94
e. Parking standards: Pursuant to the City of Moor-
park Zoning Code.
f. Minimum site landscaping: 10 percent
g. All other applicable City codes /standards apply.
Sec. 8119 -7 - OPEN SPACE (OSJ
Sec. 8119 -7.1 - Purpose and Intent
The open space area is intended to provide for the
preservation of natural physical and visual resources in
recognition of the environmental and aesthetic value of
the area with either public or private ownership.
Sec 8119 -7.2 - Permitted Uses (subject to Site Plan Reviewl
a. Open space
b. Agricultural uses (subject to Conditional Use
Permit approval)
C. Pedestrian trails
d. Nature preservation and study areas
e. Infrastructure service facilities
f. Structures and other uses accessory to permitted
uses
g. Utility easements
h. Any other use which the Director of Community
Development finds consistent with the purpose and
intent of this land use category.
Sec. 8119 -7.3 - Site Development Standards
Development standards for those uses permitted shall be
established by the site plan review process. When uses
proposed in the Open Space land use classification are
permitted in other land use classifications of the
Specific Plan, the development standards in those other
applicable classifications shall apply.
Sec. 8119 -8 - INSTITUTIONAL U l
Page - 14 - 2/94
Sec. 8119 -8.1 - Purpose and Intent
The institutional area is intended to provide for
development and maintenance of institutional uses such as
a library, museum or similar uses. The physical effects
of such uses will be limited so that negative impact.;
such as; noise, odor, glare, visual impacts and other
such effects that could be harmful to life or nearby
property will not be generated.
Sec. 8119 -8.2 - Permitted Uses
Includes public facility uses: government building;
museum; library; fire station; non profit organization
uses; church; community service center; private or public
school; day care facility; health services and hospital;
art gallery or similar uses which the Director of
Community Development finds consistent with the purpose
and intent of this land use.
Sec. 8119 -8.3 - Accessory Uses and Structures
a. Fences and Walls
b. Security and construction and storage offices,
during construction
C. Signs, per City Zoning Ordinance and the approved
Master Sign Program.
d. Accessory structures or uses the Director of Com-
munity Development finds to be consistent with, and
subordinate to, a principal use on the same site.
Sec. 8119 -8.4 - Site Development Standards
a. Height of all buildings: 35 feet (2 stories)
measured from the grade of the slab.
b. Setbacks measured from property line:
1) Front: 30 feet
2) Side:
a) Adjacent to residential lot - 50 feet
b) Adjacent to street - 30 feet
C. Adjacent to alley - 5 feet
d. None of the above - 0 feet
Page - 15 - 2/94
3) Rear:
. a) Adjacent to residential lot - 50 feet
b) Adjacent to street - 30 feet
c) Adjacent to alley - 5 feet
d) None of the above - 0 feet
4) Parking Standards: Pursuant to the City of
Moorpark Zoning Code.
5) Minimum site landscaping: 10 percent
Sec. 8119 -9 - SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
Sec. 8119 -9.1 - Review Procedures
The Carlsberg Specific Plan shall be implemented through
the Tentative Map, and Planned Development Review
Process.
a. Master Tentative Tract Maps - Master Tentative
Map(s) or parcel map(s), as applicable, shall
be filed to subdivide according to each
planning area (the "Lot(s)") within the
specific plan area. Submittal and review
requirements shall be as specified in the
Subdivision Map Act and the City of Moorpark
Subdivision Ordinance and other City
ordinances resolutions, policies and
regulations. Recorded phased final maps of
each Lot within the Master Tentative Tract
Maps(s) shall be permitted. Additional
tentative tract subdivision maps of the Lots
are to be filed subsequent to or concurrent
with the Master Tentative Tract Maps.
b. Residential Planned Development Review (RPD) -
Residential Planned Development Permit
approval shall be required for all residential
projects within the Carlsberg Specific Plan,
in accordance with City's Zoning Code.
C. Commercial Planned Development Review (CPD) -
Commercial Planned Development Permit approval
shall be required for all commercial projects
within the Carlsberg Specific Plan in
accordance with the City's Zoning Code.
d. Industrial Planned Development Review (IPD) -
Page - 16 - 2/94
Industrial Planned Development Permit approval
shall be required for all industrial projects
within the Carlsberg Specific Plan in
accordance with the City's Zoning Code.
Sec. 8119 -9.2 - Administrative ( "Minor ") Modifications to the
Specific Plan, Tentative Maps or Development
Permits
Certain modifications to the specific plan text or tract
maps are specifically deemed not to require formal
amendments (ie., through public hearing) to the specific
plan as originally approved. These are modifications
which will not materially affect the overall purpose and
intent of the specific plan.
Minor variations to development areas will occur through
implementation of the specific plan. The following
transfer program will serve both the public and the
planned development. It will:
Minimize City staff, Commission and Council time
spent on minor adjustments and technical matters.
Set criteria /findings that demonstrate consistency
with specific plan goals and objectives.
Assure that levels of development throughout the
life of the specific plan are consistent with
adequacy and provisions of infrastructure and
services.
Transfer of dwelling units between development areas may
be allowed as long as the total number of dwelling units
approved (552) is not exceeded. Transfer of acreage
between development areas shall be allowed as long as
combined developed acreage of the transferring area and
the receiving area is not exceeded by more than five
percent for each area. The transfer shall be approved
based on the following findings:
Total dwelling units and development area as
approved in the specific plan is not exceeded.
Demands on parks, schools and community facilities
are not significantly affected.
Demands on public improvements and infrastructure
are not exceeded.
Grading and landform alteration do not
significantly differ from that approved by the
Page - 17 - 2/94
specific plan.
The overall design and visual quality of the
planned community are not significantly affected.
Planning Area Boundaries adjustments will be allowed
provided that:
Adjustments in the planning area boundaries, which
do not exceed a cumulative total of ten percent of
the original size in acres, resulting from final
road alignments, geotechnical or engineering
refinements to the site plan, tentative and /or
final tract maps shall not require an amendment of
the specific plan where such adjustments are
consistent with the intent of the City General Plan
and the specific plan.
Boundaries not dimensioned on the Land Use Plan
shall be established through the final subdivision
map process and shall be generally consistent with
the exhibits within the specific plan.
Any proposed change that is not extensive enough to be
considered a substantial or fundamental change in land
use relative to the permit, would not have a substantial
adverse impact on the surrounding properties, and would
not change any findings contained in the environmental
document prepared for the permit, shall be deemed a minor
modification and be acted upon by the Director of
Community Development in accordance with applicable
procedures for minor modifications.
Sec. 8119 -9.3 - General Provisions - ( "Major ")
Modifications to the Specific Plan, Tract Maps and
Development Permits
All amendments shall be consistent with the requirements
of California Government Code Sections 65500 et seq. and
shall be subject to public notice and other requirements
of the Government Code.
Any proposed modification not determined to be addressed
by Section 8119 -9.2 above and is considered to be a
substantial change in land use relative to the specific
plan, tract map or permit, and /or would alter the
findings contained in the environmental document prepared
for the specific plan, tract map or permit, shall be
deemed a major modification and /or an amendment and shall
be acted upon by the decision - making authority which
approved the specific plan, tract map or permit.
Page - 18 - 2/94
Section 5. That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, part or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to
be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares
that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,
subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, parts or portions be
declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30)
days after the passage and adoption.
Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify the passage and
adoption of this Ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of
original ordinances of said city; shall make a minute of the
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of
the City Council at which the same is passed and adopted; and
shall, within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption
thereof, cause the same to be published once in the Moorpark News,
a weekly newspaper of general circulation, as defined in Section
6008 of the Government Code, for the City of Moorpark, and which is
hereby designated for that purpose.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of Sept,. 1994
ATTEST:
I
4".t'
Paul W. Lawrason, J
Mayor
Page - 19 -
2/94
MOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF VENTURA )
CITY OF MOORPARK }
ss.
I, Lillian E. Hare, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark,
California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 195 was adopted by the
City Council of the City of Moorpark at a meeting held on
the 21st day of Sentemh r , 1994, and that
the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS MONTGOMERY, PEREZ, WOZNIAK, AND MAYOR LAWRASON
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER HUNTER
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City,
this 23rd day of September 1994.
Lillian E. Hare
City Clerk
P r1_-t;t& C4.01
PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. PATRICK HUNTER SCOTT MONTGOMERY BERNARDO M. PEREZ JOHN E. WOZNIAK
Mayor Mayor Pro Tom Councilmember Councilmember Concilmember
Printed on Recycled Pape
17.30.010
Chapter 17.30
LIGHTING REGULATIONS
Sections:
17.30.010
Purpose and intent.
17.30.020
Definitions.
17.30.030
Applicability.
1730.040
General requirements.
1730.050
Prohibited lighting.
1730.060
Plans required.
1730.070
Design guidelines.
1730.080
Certification/testing.
1730.090
Exemptions.
17.30.100
Violation— Penalties.
17.30.110
Nonconforming systems.
1730.010 Purpose and intent.
The purpose and intent of this chapter is to provide
regulation of lighting systems constructed on properties
within the various zones in the city.
The city recognizes that lighting has both a practical
and aesthetic value and is an integral portion of any devel-
opment. The city also recognizes that improperly installed
lighting, illegal lighting, or improperly maintained lighting,
creates impacts upon astronomical resources within the
community and creates conflicts and nuisance impacts upon
abutting properties and is wasteful of energy resources by
causing energy to be expended without producing additional
useful light. (Ord. 266 § 2 (part), 1999)
17.30.020 Defmitions.
Words and terms as used in this chapter shall have the
meanings set forth in this section. Words or terms not
defined herein shall have the generally accepted meaning
as defined elsewhere within this title.
"Candlepower" means the total light output expressed
in candelas.
"Drop down lens" means a light directing diffuser or
lens which is shaped so that it lays or falls below the
horizontal plane of the bottom of the fixture, thus resulting
in direct viewing of the lens from above the horizontal
plane.
"Glare" means the effect produced by lighting sufficient
to cause annoyance, discomfort, or loss in visual perfor-
mance and visibility. For the purposes of this chapter, glare
occurs when the luminaire (or associated lens) of a light
fixture is directly viewable from a location off the property
that it serves.
"Human scale" means the proportional relationship of
a particular building, structure, or streetscape element to
human form and function.
(Moorpark 1 -01)
"Luminaire or luminary" means the light producing
element of a light fixture. Examples are bulbs and tubes.
Direct viewing of luminaries of greater than one thousand
(1,000) lumens per fixture is undesirable.
Secondary luminaire. For the purpose of this chapter
a diffusing lens between the bulb and the viewer is not
considered an obstruction to the direct view of a single
luminaire and is considered a "secondary luminaire"
Spillover. In practical terms, a close relative of glare.
"Spillover" occurs when the illumination intensity outside
the property boundaries exceeds one (1) foot - candle. (Ord.
266 § 2 (part), 1999)
1730.030 Applicability.
The regulations contained within this chapter shall apply
to all residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional
Zoned lands and projects, except additions or remodels of
single - family homes within the city. These regulations shall
apply to all specific plan areas and are intended to augment
lighting standards and regulations contained within any
adopted specific plan. (Ord. 266 § 2 (part), 1999)
1730.040 General requirements.
A. Lighting permitted shall be limited to those levels
necessary to provide safety and security to the site.
B. Use of low intensity lighting for aesthetic purposes
in order to enhance or accent building features, public art,
or landscape architectural features of a project is encour-
aged. Such lighting shall not spill over onto, or extend
beyond the property -line or into adjacent public right -of-
way.
C. All lighting systems shall meet adopted uniform
codes and standards of the city.
D_ All lighting system components shall be kept in
good repair and service. Periodic cleaning, painting and
servicing of supports, globes, fixtures and foundations is
required. Poor maintenance shall be considered a public
nuisance.
E. All lighting components shall be decorative and
shall be compatible with the architectural style of the build-
ings within the project location. (Ord. 266 § 2 (part), 1999)
1730.050 Prohibited lighting.
The following types of fighting shall be prohibited within
the city:
A. Any outdoor lighting system erected, installed,
modified or reconstructed without proper plans and permit
approvals;
B. Flashing, alternating or blinking lights, other than
traffic or hazard lights or those permitted under the sign
regulations contained in Chapter 17.40;
346 ATTACHMENT 14.
C. Low pressure sodium (LPS) lights, except
when it has been determined by the director of community
development that LPS use in proximity to a light sensitive
land use, such as an observatory, is appropriate to minimize
light impacts on the adjacent use which would otherwise
limit the function of the light sensitive land use;
D. High intensity mercury vapor security lights (with
fixture not properly implemented to shield direct viewing
of the luminaire or the light shaping lens/diffuser from
off the property) in other than rural residential or agricultur-
al areas;
E. Any luminaire that is viewed directly with no
intervening lens or shielding element, other than bare bulbs,
tube lighting, or approved neon lighting;
F. Drop down lens. (Ord. 266 § 2 (part), 1999)
1730.060 Plans required.
All commercial, industrial, institutional, and residential
projects, except additions, approved after the effective date
of the ordinance codified in this chapter shall have the
lighting system and its components, to be incorporated
within that project, approved by the city's lighting engineer
prior to issuance of building permits for that project.
Projects approved prior to the effective date of the ordinance
codified in this chapter shall comply with the provisions
of this chapter to the extent feasible, consistent with Section
17.30.110.
Each lighting plan shall incorporate electrical plans and
structural plans which detail the provision of lighting
systems for exteriors of all buildings, parking lots, loading
areas, walkways, public use areas, public art displays,
fountains, or landscape areas.
Lighting plans shall be prepared, signed and certified
by a civil or electrical engineer licensed and/or registered
within the state of California to prepare and certify lighting
system designs/plans.
Lighting plans shall, as a minimum, include and exhibit
the following:
A. Style, size, height and location of any poles used
to support lighting fixtures or electroliers;
B. Size, height and location of any foundation systems
upon which light poles may be erected;
C. Style, type, location and quantity of fixtures and/
or electroliers, whether pole mounted, bollard mounted
or building mounted;
D. Number and wattage of luminarie&Udbs/electroliers,
light color temperature (equivalent Kelvin blackbody
temperature) and/or the radiometric emission spectrum
giving relative intensity vs. wavelength over the range of
400 — 700 nanometers;
E. Shields, cut -off mechanisms, or diffusers used with
each fixture;
17.30.050
F. Construction structural and mounting details for
all installations;
G. All exterior lighting plans shall be photo-metric
consisting of a point by point foot - candle layout based upon
a ten (10) foot grid center and extended to twenty (20)
feet beyond the property line;
H. Lighting plans shall be prepared to scale, and shall
be accompanied by dimensioned detail sheets, materials
catalogues, and specifications to aid in the identification
and evaluation of proposed lighting system components.
The application for such lighting plans should be made
on the form provided by the department of community
development. A fee, as established by city council resolu-
tion, is required to accompany each application for a lighting
plan. (Ord. 266 § 2 (part), 1999)
1730.070 Design guidelines.
A. General Guidelines.
L All lighting shall be stationary and directed away
from all adjacent properties and streets/rights -of -ways.
2. Lighting systems shall be energy efficient.
3. Lights shall be shielded or recessed to direct glare
and reflections within the boundaries of the property.
4. Lighting shall be consistent among fixtures used
throughout the project so that single fixtures or small groups
of fixtures shall not be of unusually high intensity or
brightness such that hot spots are created.
5. All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale,
intensity and height to the use to be served.
6. All walkway lighting, public space lighting, patio
area lighting shall be kept to human scale. Bollard style
lighting is preferred.
7. Security lighting shall be provided at all entrances
and exits to buildings.
8. All lighting fixtures shall incorporate full cutoff
features such that the luminaire is not visible and that
spillover or direct light emissions do not extend beyond
the property line or into adjacent public right -of -way.
9. Concrete pedestals, bases or foundations intended
for the mounting of poles shall be restricted in height and
bulk to that necessary to provide adequate, safe anchorage
for poles and fixtures, but shall in no case exceed the
heights specified in Section 17.30.070D. All concrete
pedestals shall be painted or stucco coated to be compatible
with the project architectural elevations, or to blend with
the landscape areas in which they are constructed.
10. Unshielded pack lighting fixtures and area wide
flood lighting are prohibited.
B. Lighting pole height:
1. Residential: fourteen (14) feet;
2. Commercial: twenty (20) feet;
3. Industrial: twenty-five (25) feet;
346-1 (Moorpark 1-01)
17.30.070
4. Institutional: twenty (20) feet.
C. Lighting Values:
L Exterior parking areas:
Seven (7) foot- candles maximum,
One (1) foot- candle minimum;
2. Interior parking areas:
Ten (10) foot- candles minimum;
3. Blue metal halide and high pressure sodium
electroliers: four hundred (400) watt maximum;
4. Fluorescent lighting units: one hundred (100) watts
per light fixture. Such units shall be shielded so that tubes
or lenses are not viewable outside the intended illuminated
area.
D. Pedestals. Pedestals used to provide ground mounting
foundations for lighting poles and fixtures shall not exceed
six (6) inches in height when placed adjacent to sidewalks,
within planters, or within parking lots. Light fixtures when
placed in a hardscape area shall be mounted flush with
the surrounding paving or hardscape.
E. Pole and pedestal clearances:
1. Curb face: three (3) feet;
2. Handicap parking space or ramp: five (5) feet;
3. Parking space:
side — two (2) feet,
head — three (3) feet;
4. Trash enclosure: three (3) feet from any vehicle
approach;
5. Drive aisles: three (3) feet;
6. Edge of sidewalk: two (2) feet.
F. Minimum fixture vertical clearance:
1. Over drivewayslaisles: fourteen (14) feet;
2. Over walkways: eight (8) feet.
G. Shielding/Shrouds. All lighting fixtures shall be
designed and installed such that no light will be emitted
above the horizontal plane. Integral cut-off devices or
shields and/or the addition of external shrouds of compatible
architectural design to the buildings shall be used to limit
stray light.
H. Automatic Shutoff. All lighting systems shall be
designed to include an automatic shutoff control with
manual override capability such that only a minimum
number of fixtures remain on after the closing time of the
facility which they serve. It is the intent of this subsection
that significant reductions in nighttime light glow occur.
Reductions shall not be less than seventy -five percent (75%)
of the designed lighting output and fifty percent (50%)
of the energy load of the system after the hour of ten
(10:00) p.m., except for approved entertainment venues,
businesses for which conditions of approval permit operation
beyond ten (10:00) p.m. and twenty -four (24) hour business-
es, or unless otherwise approved by the director of commu-
nity development, upon recommendation of the city's
(Moorpark 1 -01) 346-2
lighting engineer that a significant amount of energy will
not be saved or the existing level of light is needed for
safety or security around the premises. (Ord. 266 § 2 (part),
1999)
1730.080 Certification/testing.
Each lighting plan shall meet the standards of this chapter
and title, as well as those structural and electrical codes
adopted by the city which may apply.
The applicant's engineer shall prepare and certify that
the plan has been prepared in accordance with this chapter
and any design materials furnished by the city's lighting
engineer.
The city's lighting engineer shall review and approve
the plans and certify to their compliance with this chapter
and any applicable design guidelines. The city's lighting
engineer shall sign all zoning clearances necessary to issue
building permits for the implementation of the lighting
plans.
Prior to final inspection, or where applicable, issuance
of a certificate of occupancy, the city lighting engineer
shall cause to be performed a photometric field inspection
of the approved lighting system for the project. The inspec-
tion shall verify the proper construction and installation
of materials within the approved plan, determine the actual
light patterns and values through light meter testing and
observation, and determine the extent of any errant lighting.
Deviations and/or violations shall be corrected prior to the
final clearance for the project. (Ord. 266 § 2 (part), 1999)
1730.090 Exemptions.
The criteria of this chapter shall not apply to any of
the following:
A. One (1) incandescent bulb of one hundred (100)
watts or less used in low density residential or rural lighting
areas, provided such fixture is shielded so as not to emit
light above the horizontal plane or beyond the property
line;
B. Athletic field lights within a public park, recreation
or school campus established pursuant to special plans
meeting recognized standards for such facilities constructed
in accordance with a photometric plan for these facilities.
Nonhorizontal fixtures are discouraged;
C. Navigation beacons, aircraft wanting lighting upon
towers or similar structures, hazard markers, railroad signals
and crossing warning devices;
D. Security lighting for prison, jail facilities, medical
facilities or special health care facilities;
E. Traffic control devices;
F. Seasonal lighting displays used in conjunction with
special holidays or religious celebrations so long as the
glare is not sufficient to pose safety hazards to pedestrians
and motorists, or cause sufficient attraction to result in
creation of a nuisance or hazard to vehicular traffic;
G. Temporary sale or special event lighting as permitted
through the issuance of appropriate permits by the city;
H. Repair or replacement of individual lighting fixtures
existing prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified
in this chapter, provided that the fixture and/or the luminaire
repaired or replaced does not exceed the intensity of the
original lighting fixture and further provided that the repair
or replacement is subject to any required permits;
I. Safety or security lighting within single- family
residential neighborhoods recommended by police or special
security inspections as part of a neighborhood watch
program provided such lighting shall not create a nuisance
to abutting properties as a result of spillover. To the extent
that the prescribed lighting is not diminished in effective-
ness, all such lighting shall incorporate motion detectors,
photocells or similar devices to activate the special light
fixtures, but shall be provided with a manual switching
device to override the fixture when necessary. (Ord. 266
§ 2 (part), 1999)
17.30.100 Violation -- Penalties.
It shall be unlawful for any person to install, replace,
reconstruct or intensify any lighting system, for which a
permit is required, upon any commercial, industrial, institu-
tional or residential property within the city not in compli-
ance with the provisions of this chapter.
Any person who violates any provision of, or fails to
comply with any requirement of this chapter is guilty of
an infraction and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished
in accordance with Chapter 1.12 of this code.
It shall be the responsibility of each occupant, property
owner, home owners' association, tenant association, or
property management association having jurisdiction over
property to ensure compliance with the intent and provisions
of this chapter. Covenants and conditions for any property
association shall contain provisions for the design, review,
approval and continued maintenance of lighting systems
within the boundaries of such association. (Ord. 266 § 2
(part), 1999)
17.30.110 Nonconforming systems.
Lighting systems, for which valid permits have been
issued, existing upon properties within any zone prior to
the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter
shall be considered legally nonconforming. As such, repair,
maintenance, and replacement with like fixtures of these
lighting systems shall be permitted, unless otherwise provid-
ed for within this chapter.
Replacement, repair or reconstruction of twenty-five
percent (25%) or more of the fixtures within an existing
17.30.090
legal nonconforming lighting system, as determined by
the director of community development, shall require that
the system be brought into conformity with the provisions
of this chapter.
Lighting systems within single- family projects found
to create a nuisance to abutting residences or upon the
public right -of -way, shall be corrected in such a manner
as to remove the nuisance.
Alterations to existing legal nonconforming lighting
systems shall not be permitted except for those which result
in a lighting system for the property which is more confoml-
ing, with these provisions or which reduce the level of
nonconformity.
Whenever a project site is the subject of a major modifi-
cation to the approved development plan as defined by
this code, the major modification application shall incorpo-
rate a revised lighting system plan in order to bring the
property into conformance with this chapter. (Ord. 266
§ 2 (part), 1999)
346-3 (MooWk 1 -01)
'ECENED
4PR - 2 2002
'rryOF
140ORPARY
i.
NEY LUS jNGELF A EA UF
7
JI
!sort r
cwft or
uv"*CA
------- -- -
tv;
7
i. 4 s
402
SF
-41i. ': 1� .
$IF ZELMAN RETAIL •
T
3 PAR I NERS INC.
7.
siih
LOS ANGRA c"Fo"'m
RETAIL
F ss
"_7
LLL
7;
30800 SF
r
tf-------- -
z
L
T
T - 7
7,—
h r
LU
4.
>
E
R.
cr
Al CIE
c R 'w
14f GOkR[DM)E-N SMI SF: J
Hill
i f CC
pz-� " . :1 ..' S F
A 94984
OTARGET sF B
C3 (3=
RETAIL
j 127000 SF cl 11
, jFJ',
c
RETAIL
0--UD#4G grooqo,, is 30000 C2 C>
TOCKROO SF
m 38s4 Sr
WW SF 1_1678 SFm RETAIL
-50 SIF
2 5492 SF _
12
STOCXRO(),A
Sego SF f
SF
WIN I&
!7
Dra wA
kj' &'I
TiL 1;4 1 .1 1
TOT
WD, olm
s
's P'�� - '. '. I U. f - Im f 717
4.i
S IT6 � � � �' � b D
P LAN aE�.�.
ATTACHMENT
T.
SCALE:
jgpg "
cl 50 75' W
UM 4 Unn
D-V %ft S*}.
98201n
PHOTOMETRIC
INITIAL
--- — __j
�CEWED
ADD - 2 2002
rM OF MOORPARK
_.i
ad
me
7-
_a1A
1wrs�s
A'F B' I,O.� .4NGELE A I E.'VVF 4..ror
a
A.
r
•. 1 a. 1_ 1 � :. b.- , -y. -s. - -- � ,,. -yr= �s =�_�'- ♦ 3 -- . _ - ° -='�T= . t. ,, y ..- ...�.. _.. _. ._.
1 ,
b �
1L.• i ♦ . rYr:� � ,. • • ' �1r ,• x'vr:c�ns, V � -r � ^t- •..�..aTy,� �,� t, ., : . ,. 1. <. ,. . 1. , .. 1, „ ' ` �. . ,. ,
1 1• �' I-i -- ° -� +-`�h� :. -. I.. _I I "' i .. r� �•I'� h "1.1 ', .- a�za�r� fli;�- - ^-- r r'�,�..., ;.,,��•ft ili i'�:•+�d =r�''ff lY� t, {�I;t :j.; [71:•14: ;�.y •i ...lr•�i •f• "�I,f T,:l I w• - .. !: ,
`;�rt �' _ �. =., {� ' = _ �. X1;3, , . T� 1;-, �; .�. i ZELMAIV RETAIL
T - r !+ESrAURANr ti I
—„ I 838t SF - ` �jj 1_ C i- I I ! - { ' i'► h+ ! ( r.'y l ! +. , +;, ft ' i PARTNERS INC ,3 46 Sf ZINC.
--1-- _�--' _'• Li�.� .I ,li'I+l F 'i�, !f, !, I.. SOF¢f0
,� I; .1i__:. i : _r j -�• t', i. .1 -.�i ', JI�,�� S.�Fp .7� V Y - ' f +,111 1 l• 1. I� Il1=T .lI}•' 11• I. rS�.IIfQM'1
2 : `cry. �; �' - t;_, , AlL I k: rmsxiao,
II ' -I - 7i -, , - J` -rte -•_:. l; '` �, _ -I -',' '_,.lu, I" I♦.I -h RI'{a,�f 308 11- rr� 1,•! tj I_
+�
j1. ' I • ...iu J•?" -} `. ..t `' -tL -♦ `r�f. - -t.: `±�L. =- #�Rq �t1,.. -•�..- ff'u B.L •r I I ^., I r� r'7'i 14 '„1 ' rl i -
,.-- +7r - -., ••_j....t.4.. • -• i / Ire ;-j- '-'. +o�,. .. ' j i ,I I 1 , i 1. 4 - ,4'Tjt— .I
• I . tom- -. _� "- o. ,1 ` `F _ _ s, .� .n ' , �Y Lu
C.3
r {i_ ,f ��1 t.l f•.� It' I I'
• � f i � � i ' ---2- • ,. s - __. .. '- �J_.�__' �. J� __ Y'-� ~ _ �' �;�'. �1 � i� I i I.. � �. c�.l- L'._E:. t:E 6.1, � �I
�
_ ` .
i 1 -�. .—• a l: I I, I r I , r KOHL'S a ! Y
_
- {I rI
�I i ji'f -, .._-;. "f' ��: - b_ , ,'� '.} ,_j: (sfll"f•I I�+ L,i it. �•: i':. �k: ,_.- .r_;' T ! - --
y -rte { ?� ,• ,, ,, ii!_ T <C
- .. -hJ`Y, a�_.i td r,• }.. _ -=,i; •! I .. ,. 87771 SF�.>
Jf ,. - _ GAROEN 4� �{ h i, {;l1p�.{ ,, { 7,. .7214 SFfo.x.,
Q CENTER t Eeh`ti+l� I'f j7 ; '1'h .. 94984 u U
�I II eeao ,�' 111a•Ir•.Ltf: , SF
OTARGET I B - t: ,, :i. Q
•'
127000 SF j RETAIL C'y ::,' I lT �, . , I I f'j f y� �e i, a
C:) g
I pC 30000 SF RETAIL Gz ,. �: ,' �.. '
Il r _ 1. ' S7 KRDOM I 23814 Sr liE7 y' 1 f l:l !
16000 SF s1678 SF_, 8450 SF :r� 1 1 I ♦'• It) I•.�- , C i.. -- !`,
25492 SF I' r, F i Ft ,: I� D2 j Reosa
"{ 1 th. ti. SHOPS '� STOGtROOM
I, r 5830 SF f 7 M SF !
i "�.C- - �,rr.w,,.yw e - y `; . • ' J Z7 t Cul�,e�.e.
-. .. t , \ I �_� ____ �y, N— ^,—t.• r t•`'' I I :• „','arS .. _ :i. 4• W. NM
T .v �+, �T r %j J '.' I • •.LQ $fr
Tt
!4"
� I r z
,i ., •.! I t, b. � _. >{ 4 � -I f. ` ; I;. i�d •� - i , 7'-� ' �.(iL� _ rae411
tJ I:!•� _ -�••r 'R>, -' ='i 'I 1111@
j l - II nor 4 „ .• t'ZTf i,1'CI� r T - ,�-
J 4+ ' .11,i ;. , (� t� o"_ BUSNESS :ARK *. , ' �� 1 1. {,I I• ; T1 ' 1,�•TT I !1 ", Tl , d� f a eln.
' „ , 1 ' 1 t .- _ i, t, I 1. b I ! •I �I I (tl'•"'�i I�L L�1 �� � t I __ '•r �'�1+rkr 9a1Y
i,
SITE PLAN •° 4, fi 1. 1, b 1r: I I E 'L 1,I , � S., jt It
Wit
M~Ccmw..
wo a ska m o„uo Lft t,$
: f= 5U-W
ATTACHMENT �j �! >' +� +� �� RIM
o �ii ,�`■il 250; PHOTOMETRIC
` MAINTAINED
___..__j
Stpn.
W" ob. . r . N. tm —. no -4
Wall Mounting Option
-PA-KI
,A,►SD -
rou
ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING (or equal)
Promenade Series
10' to 12- moon" height
Bronze Anodized krsh
Typical Pedestrian Light Fixture
ARCHITECTURAL AREA UGHTING (or equal)
Promenade Series
iys MOUNTING HEK1HT I
Bronze Anodized (Wish
Typical Parking Lot Light Fixture
wi. PIt�Q
w.. T1tASD
Misc. Details
Project Entry Monument
i rr
s7 Qpx
17
..ce..w
3111r-
Nq rwlq �.o
C,...a.
L...«
=�
.G
swlWL w S
C-W "a
ZELMAN RETAIL
PARTNERS, INC.
Sb SE(aro SHEET
Sl1iE a
LOS MULES CAUaw goon
TRUHN QM $3380
U
�g w
z �
< cc
tz Q
C cc
Revbn
IGrel.-
14tti -- - - --
Drawng
ye Do or am
(1 14 atlr
C"91 aUpw
N"" 1Ym wM
li Now
IM WA
A Na '27
sr�mn
Details
- Site
`+f , S fit+ °:' � y� ye' �' ¢ �S+?i.tt 4•� _
rom
ena e
LEM
erles
:"
Y!
�4�.s r:a;� •� . 1
1trjM1 1
ir
fjL w dam
C p•Cy
t
b \
Y-
- Ill � � � • , --
� +J
Rr
Y
r .
�t
• +ter- .». . .
Er.
Ar{:
i }�'ri Y ✓ �l'. � fi
I/o/v fu
j4 }
u.
..� `�.,
IN
110,
I
y i3.•.
Y �.` r �
Ir ,�y.
.� t�,�'U' � .,J: tY '.•��gi�i.,•SR" "" 5� � l' )�(. 2 ?'4 <
� � � h•�,y .�.
Y~�.r..�
~9� �'
�'Y ✓.'K�°.. ��
-
t^. 'R� Y tom`
i }�'ri Y ✓ �l'. � fi
I/o/v fu
j4 }
u.
..� `�.,
balancing classic design..
with lighting perforrnancej
Well d s!qf
streets.
mination. That
their environment witl , it -I ,
evenly lit rr tvil! 0r lnflr�
Until the l' Ii i (v:
address the nr,-e ! t,;r
car,,eas. Tile
�.hC1lC6'. V` -1if' It: -_; f n�al l'•� - r , . ;.. , ;i' ' . . l�ai:. ,,
, t
energy casts, gal,._
Now, properly Ilillr f 111 !t, ! i i I1 : ;I C-' i::, . ii
{ F-
possible with I_I,f
(jpt!cal syste ►Z I- =ll
reflector systews,
!I W ill)
Discover
performance an(.l aeslhp;i,., it) t)erio(i i,xri ire%,
The Prorneriade 'r;r!I1ty,_,)- y :;;: ihr; ,!t hI "JIi g0a1;
Illt_ n unatlon, low cost _•( er a''C)r!, c?r KI :.f iyr,_�'y' efttC;!t
C. y.
High performance reflector
systems for control
A key elern�,.rit( t. ? (jo(O
outdoor envirc,0111'Hi"!
ratio between the riiil,!(111.1111 'I)
levels in the or-Mir-minent
minimum ano
minimum to r-naxiorni-wi rallo i,,.
The Prorfienad,,:',--, t cusled
you to precisely aln-i the light.
even illuminaticti ()t the
of light common with other
Objects in the environment are
because the
does not var,..;
AAL
1[t 1C) your streets and pedestrian areas compared to any
:fStiG refractor lensed fixture: pollute the environment with
optics address local ordinances for disability glare. Avoid
i Al, ining areas with the precision reflector systems built into
; r0iace the
s f r :,3ilable in type
in type 3
venters for proper aiming.
s ij 400 watts in all standard metal halide and high pressure
,.;Hity standards.
L7 ;,� t _use T -6 ceramic metal halide lamps to insure color accuracy
VERTICAL_ LAME'
tof WOE-
TYPE I ypE. �
HORIZONTAL LAMP
ref lectors for control
� --T r }_
I YPE 2 TYPE 3
^orn
Refractor Acorn
Promenade .Series
.. r,
T...,
TYPE 4 ] YPE 5
HOW WELL CAN YOU RECOGNIZE
OBJECTS AT NIGHT? Not very well if the
luminaires are extremely bright compared to the
objects around them. The pictures on the left
demonstrate this phenomenon. Notice the
difference in the "visibility" or clarity of nearby
objects illuminated by a Promenade fixture. Dis-
ability glare or "veiling luminance" (the contrast
ratio between the brightness of the luminaire
and surrounding objects) is greatly reduced.
Visual perception is greatly improved with the
Promenade Series.
Tool -less access
.............. using concealed, flip up latches on the FIRMS, PRMD,
and PRMN for easy access to the lamp an(! ballast
Fully sealed lamp chambers
................... for long term lighting performance. Molded silicone
gaskets insure trouble free sealing compared to
neoprene materials. The lenses are easily replaced in 0
the field and have full surround silicone gaskets.
The ballast module is easy
................. to remove and features q jick disconnects for
easy field replacement. All ballasts Lite installed ..end
tested at the factory.
AAL •
A �'5
L1 I
A!
I-eases are optical grade DH
acrylic; or- tempered glass,
(Y "A "'/I!J� ill ; it
Automated cleaning cycle
IA-1 _M
Every AAL product
receives our state
of the art finishing
process which includes a five
stage impingement chemical clean-
ing and sealing cycle, followed by a
thermoset, super TGIC polyester
powder finish coat.
;hanging
egress cyo��s
require
lighting
around the
building
Perimeter.
r 41 !
'I- T-1
-1 r'(j `Cl w,- igh p
ik
att Mr �3, v:
!,I.) i,A'L ft, I j; "(.:!Cj
�-)t OVOIrIq 11LIMirintion :mh! the HIV -1 is or resto((-d t: full
S (A.-At i awhary q
PH
4. IL-85, IL-165 Inducticri 1_ i ! f. ii f, . P M
AAL
IV
Tine, 01. ji-Auction lamp system
fron-i Phillips Lighting is a
revolution.ary lighting system
g and "instant on" characteristics.
tis 90% survival after 60,000 hours
'i5% survival after 100,000 hOUrs (27 years
t! ie cost of frequent relamping.
)nsistent throughout the
I.Y lighting applications.
.,,.jht output under variable
Hle (;,i I F)01: )o Iiiiiiens, which is comparable to
.,
[+
gI Aur, lar i if �,
The C _ 1i;,11-Tv output I ilimens, which is comparable
to �_-t n-letal haliale,
The OL Induction Lamp
system is available for
the PRIVIS, PRIVID and
PRIVIN fixture styles. The
standard OL configura-
tion includes a type five
distribution reflector and
LDL lens.
AIMWEAD
—^'—
PRN18
---------
DB1'4F12
PRMD______
TRA8
DB3'4R14
V
----'
-----
PRMN 3'PRyN8
---------------`-----------'
* 2'TRA5U
---------' -----''--------'---
OB12'4R10 OB8'4F14
AAL
�
n
"I
PR5-5F20. BC6-5
rm% r-% R A k I
TRA5U
DB6-4R14
PRM3 -..-----.-PR-M2-PM
TRA7 •
DB9-4F14 DB5-4F16 DB4-5820
AAL
-PRM2..
TRA5D
DB2-5F20
t
I t{ F1
t ti ;.l a �t
�� 1 \', t ••fit• + •,r ~ l ;' .. f ,� ,
- ---•1� j� �' .. -_
Ntl
"I L-1c
;' e_�A�
tr+� ;
I
i ;4,' 44 `l� +' •'� ,: ,+ : ;, , •�',1•;1•i} ,ij'k'4u,tii4{('• ,• �---� --
Intl
{ ' +;+41,�i �til`��t� +��l, '•i r� �i + �;��cl�i {l IIIV,.1. 11 �
;) � ;•I l'. ;Y S,s''�iVl`!.'jl�l.:t,i f ' +t , 1`iVi V f +i '' � t � `
';; 11111!:'+ i� ,�I}l�il�,?i'iI�I }k4�,�i44, +•I -
t WIS. 1 ;l
jklk
U ,: ��; ill+ Ni .'.•i1l?if1,111'�4tltf;iti�1'1: ,.1 1 r �' .
,
11J i�:i 1'k �'i +• '' 1 ;• ,1111' 1,t
1 4 i',`V•i., '' �{, �; 1J''{• llyl{! �I�� ''�'V,,ii�1� {���:f�,t1;1'`,:' t .: -
,
17
1•�''it
4,t , � ' ; l l l t
1 i•
11 ^)
}e
x ..
• -
� s ',�. '
yis •,�'# Y
,•t `. s'M•'��i l
IK4
`r
?�
Z7 y �1
it 9ft`'�4.y
N.O.
I
i ;4,' 44 `l� +' •'� ,: ,+ : ;, , •�',1•;1•i} ,ij'k'4u,tii4{('• ,• �---� --
Intl
{ ' +;+41,�i �til`��t� +��l, '•i r� �i + �;��cl�i {l IIIV,.1. 11 �
;) � ;•I l'. ;Y S,s''�iVl`!.'jl�l.:t,i f ' +t , 1`iVi V f +i '' � t � `
';; 11111!:'+ i� ,�I}l�il�,?i'iI�I }k4�,�i44, +•I -
t WIS. 1 ;l
jklk
U ,: ��; ill+ Ni .'.•i1l?if1,111'�4tltf;iti�1'1: ,.1 1 r �' .
,
11J i�:i 1'k �'i +• '' 1 ;• ,1111' 1,t
1 4 i',`V•i., '' �{, �; 1J''{• llyl{! �I�� ''�'V,,ii�1� {���:f�,t1;1'`,:' t .: -
,
17
1•�''it
4,t , � ' ; l l l t
1 i•
11 ^)
'PST TOP OR ARM MOUNTED
CAT NO DESCRIPTION
PRMS V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector
PRMS V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector
PRMS H2 _ horizontal lamp, type 2 reflector
PRMS H3 horizontal lamp, type 3 reflector
PRMS H4 horizontal lamp, type 4 reflector
PRMS H5 horizontal lamp, type 5 reflector
PRMS IL85 includes a 85 watt OL Induction
Lamp, electronic ballast and an LDL lens, specify
120 or 277 volt.
PRMD IL165 includes a 165 watt OL Induction
Lamp, electronic ballast multitap for 208, 240 or 277
volt. Includes an LDL Lens.
WHT White DBZ Dark Bronze
BLK Black DGN Dark Green
MAL Matte Aluminum VGR Verde Green
ATG Antique Green CRT Corten
-stom and RAL colors are available at an
ra cost. Please submit a color sample or
RAL color number.
CHM Glass chimney, with brass holder.
LDL Lightly diffused lens to conceal the fixture
interior and reduce lamp brightness.
TA27 Adapter to slip a post top mounted head
over 2' /a" tenon (specify tenon dimensions).
RST Instant restart ballast for 150 watt or less
HIPS lamp (S55).
QRS Quartz restrike controller and socket for a
T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp.
OL Socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp.
Field wired to a separate circuit.
HSS House side shield, factory installed
PSB Pulse start ballast for 250 MH, V3 or V5
only.
See the AAL catalog for a full range of
decorative bases, arms and poles.
^ XTURE BALLAST /LAMP ARM
. IMS V5
250MH
70MH uses medium base ED -17 lamps.
0 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120120812401277 volt
70MHT6 bi -pin socket for T6 lamp
70 watt metal halide multitap ballast
12-0/21081240/277 volt
100MH uses medium base ED -17 larrrL)�_
100 watt metal halide multitap ballast
1 X01208/240/277 volt
150MH uses medium base ED -17 lam_,,;.::
150 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
150MHT6 bi -pin socket for T6 lamp
150 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/2.77 volt
175MH uses medium base ED -17 /amps__
175 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
250MH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps.__
250 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use : 3
POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp, use ED
lamps.
70HPS uses medium base ED -17 lamp
70 watt high pressure sodium multitap
120,20812401277 volt
100HPS uses medium base ED -17 lani,
100 watt high pressure sodium multitap
1201208/240/277 volt
150HPS uses medium base ED -17 larr�,s_
150 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballasl
120/208/240/277 volt
200HPS uses mogul base ED -18 lamps.
200 watt high pressure sodium r-nultitap bal1(_Y,
120/208/240/277 volt
250H PS uses mocrul base E -18 lam,os.
200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ball -,
120/208/240/277 volt.
All fixtures prewired for 277 volts.
POLE
DB5 -4F16 -188
PRMS H3 100HPS WMA35U •
COLOR OPTIONS
BILK LDL
VGR CHM
" Refer to your AAL catalog for a complete listing of available arms and poles.
MI 13
T;
}.)iMENSIONS:
zip" 19" dia
480 MM
`PA-- 2.75
-T. ', gas.
t' F ; ;1TING =54
Yiown with lightly diffused
s
(LDL)
DIMENSIONS:
36" x 19" dia
865rvw x 480 mm
EPA= 2.10
WT.= 34 LBS.
IP RATING= 54
POST TOP OR ARM MOUNTED
CAT NO DESCRIPTION
PRMD V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector
PRMD V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector
PRMD H2 horizontal lamp, type 2 reflector _
PRMD H3 horizontal lamp, type :3 reflector
PRMD H4 horizontal lamp, type 4 reflector
PRMD H5 horizontal lamp, type 5 reflector
PRMD IL85 includes a 85 watt OL Induction
Lamp, electronic ballast and an LDL lens, specify
120 or 277 volt.
PRMD IL165 includes a 165 watt OL Induction
Lamp, electronic ballast multitap for 208, 240 or 277
volt. Includes an LDL Lens.
WHT White DBZ Dark Bronze
BLK Black DGN Dark Green
MAL Matte Aluminum VGR Verde Green
ATG Antique Green CRT Corten
Custom and RAL colors are available at an
extra cost. Please submit a color sample or
RAL color number.
LDL Lightly diffused lens to conceal the fixture
interior and reduce lamp brightness.
MAT Cast adapter to side mount to a 2" o.d. mast
arm (by others)
RST Instant restart ballast for 150 watt or less
HPS lamp (S55).
QRS Quartz restrike controller and socket for a
T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp.
QL Socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp.
Field wired to a separate circuit.
HSS House side shield, factory installed
PSB Pulse start ballast for 250 MH, V3 or V5
only.
See the AAL catalog for a full range of
decorative bases, arms and poles.
70MH uses medium base ED -17 lamps.
70 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
70MHT6 bi -pin socket for T6 lamp_._
70 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120120812401277 volt
t 0OMH uses medium base ED -17 lamps.
100 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
150MH uses medium base ED -17 lamps.
150 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
150MHT6 bi- in socket for T6 lamp
150 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120!20812401277 volt
175MH uses medium base ED -17 lamps.
175 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
25OMH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps.
250 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a 1
POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28
lamps.
70HPS uses medium base ED -17 lamps.
70 -ivatt high pressure sodium multitap ballast
120/208/240,1277 volt
1 OOHPS uses medium base ED -17 lamps.
100 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
150HPS uses medium base ED -17 lamps.
150 watt high pressure sodium r-nultitap ballast
120120812401277 volt
200HPS uses mogul base ED -18 lamps.
200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
250HPS uses mogul base E -18 lamps.
200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt.
All fixtures prewired for 277 volts.
ORDERING •
FIXTURE BALLAST /LAMP ARM POLE COLOR OPTIONS
2 -PRMD V5 250MH
PRMD H3 100HPS
TRA55 DB2 -5F20 -188
WMA35U •
DGN LDL
VGR RST
Refer to your AAL catalog for a complete listing of available arms and poles.
14
6
e
CAT NO DESCRIPTION
PRMN V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector
PRMN V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector
PRMN IL85 Includes a 85 watt QI.. Indiction
Lamp, electronic ballast and an L.DL lens, specify
120 or 277 volt.
PRMD IL165 includes a 165 watt OL Induction
Lamp, electronic ballast and an LDL lens, specify
120 or 27 7 volt.
WHT
White
DBZ
Dark Bronze
BLK
Black
DGN
Dark Green
MAL
Matte Aluminum
VGR
Verde Green
ATG
Antique Green
CRT
Corten
Custom and RAL colors are available at an
extra cost. Please submit a color sample or
RAL color number.
BPS Struts are finished in a brass colored powder
coating.
LDL Lightly diffused lens to conceal the fixture
interior and reduce lamp brightness.
RST Instant restart ballast for 150 watt or less
HPS lamp (S55).
QRS Quartz restrike controller and socket for a
T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp.
QL Socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp.
Field wired to a separate circuit.
HSS House side shield, factory installed
PSB Pulse start ballast for 250 MH, V3 or V5
only.
See the AAL catalog for a full range of
decorative bases, arms and poles.
71XTURE BALLAST /LAMP ARM
/ 2 -PRMN V5
PRMN IL85
70MH uses medium base ED- 171ampps
70 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
70MHT6 bi -pin socket for T6 lam _
0 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
10OMH uses medium base ED -17 lamp . -).
100 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120120812401277 volt
150MH uses medium base ED_ 171arnj?�;
150 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
150MHT6 bi -pin socket for T6 larno
150 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
175MH uses medium base ED -17 lan cos.
175 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
250MH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps_.: -
250 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/2.40/277 volt. Horizontal lamp;
POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use EL' -
lamps.
70HPS uses medium base ED -17
70 watt high pressure sodium multitap r;.
120/208/240/277 volt
100HPS uses medium base ED_ -17 1arnj.:..:,
100 watt high pressure sodium multitap L,:ii..�:;
120/208/240/277 volt
150HPS uses medium base ED -17 larrlf?
150 watt high pressure sodium multitap, h -1i.!
120/208/240/277 volt
200HPS uses mogul base ED -18 lamb__
200 watt high pressure sodium multitap
120/208/240/277 volt
250HPS uses mogul base E -18 larrlps.
200 watt high pressure sodium multitap
120/208/240/277 volt.
All fixtures prewired for 277 volts.
POLE COLOR
250MH 2- TRA35U DB2 -5R18 -188 BLK
120 0 DB9 -4R12 -125 DGN
Refer to your AAL catalog for a complete listing of available arms and poles.
OPTIONS
i:o vn with lightly diffused
:1.00
DIMENSIONS:
36" x 19" dia
915mm x 480 MM
FPA -2.75
V/T=38 CBS.
IP RATING= 54
PRM2
DIMENSIONS:
20" x 25" dia.
51Omm x 635mm
EPA =1.9
V1lT.= 45 CBS.
IP RATING = 54
PRM2 -PM
Slips over a 5" (127mm)
diameter pole or tenon.
DIMENSIONS:
40" x 25" dia.
101 5m x 635MM
EPA = 1.9
WT.= 45 CBS.
IP RATING = 54
CAT NO DESCRIPTION
PRM2 V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector
PRM2 V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector
PRM2 H2 horizontal larnp, type 2 reflector
PRM2 H3 horizontal lamp, type 3 reflector
PRM2 H4 horizontal lamp, type 4 reflector
PRM2 H5 horizontal lamp, type 5 reflector
WHT White DBZ Dark Bronze
BLK Black DGN Dark Green
MAL Matte Aluminum VGR Verde Green
ATG Antique Green CRT Corten
Custom and RAL colors are available at an
extra cost. Please submit a color sample or
RAL color number.
MAT Cast adapter to side mount to a 2" o.d. mast
arm (by others)
RST Instant restart ballast for 150 watt HPS
lamp (S55).
QRS Quartz restrike controller and socket for a
T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp.
QL Socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp.
Field wired to a separate circuit.
HSS House side shield, factory installed
PSB Pulse start ballast 175, 250 or 400 MR
V3 and V5 reflectors only.
See the AAL catalog for a full range of
decorative bases, arms and poles.
FIXTURE BALLAST/LAMP ARM
CAT NO DESCRIPTION
PRM2 -PM V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector
PRM2 -PM V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector
PRM2 -PM H2
horizontal lamp, type 2 reflector
PRM2 -PM H3
horizontal larnp, type 3 reflector
PRM2 -PM H4
horizontal lamp, type 4 reflector
PRM2 -PM H5 horizontal lamp, type 5 reflector
175MH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps.
175 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120120812401277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a
POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28
lamps.
250MH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps.
250 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a
POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28
lamps.
40OMH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps.
250 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a
POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28
lamps.
150HPS uses mogul base ED -23112 lamps.
150 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
200HPS uses mogul base E -18 lamps.
200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
250HPS uses mogul base E -18 lamps.
250 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
400HPS uses mogul base F_ -18 lamps.
400 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
All fixtures prewired for 277 volts.
POLE COLOR OPTIONS
PRM4 -PM V5 400HPS 0 DB2 -5F20 -188 DBZ LDL
2 -PRM2 H3 250HPS TRA51D DB10 -5R20 -250 BLK •
Refer to your AAL catalog for a complete listing of available arms and poles.
AAL •
it
4
ARM OR PENDANT MOUNT POST TOP OR ARM MOUNT
CAT NO DESCRIPTION CAT NO DESCRIPTION
PRM3 V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector
PRM3 V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector
PRM3 H2 horizontal lamp, type 2 reflector
PRM3 H3 horizontal lamp, type 3 reflector
PRM3 H4 horizontal lamp, type 4 reflector
PRM3 -PM V3
vertical lamp, type 3 reflector
PRM3 -PM V5
vertical lamp, type 5 reflector
PRM3 -PM H2
horizontal lamp, type 2 reflector
PRM3 -PM H3
horizontal lamp, type 3 reflector
PRM3 -PM H4
horizontal lamp, type 4 reflector
PRM3 H5 horizontal lamp, type 5 reflector PRM3 -PM H5 horizontal lamp, type 5 reflector
70MH uses medium base ED -17 lamps. 70HPS uses medium base ED -17 lamps.
70 watt metal halide multitap ballast 70 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt 12012081240/277 volt
70MHT6 bi -pin socket for T6 lamp 100HPS uses medium base ED -17 lamps.
70 watt metal halide multitap ballast 100 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt 120/208/2401277 volt
10OMH uses medium base ED -17 lamps. _ 150HPS uses medium base ED -17 lamps.
100 watt metal halide multitap ballast 150 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast
'20/208/240/277 volt 120/208/240/277 volt
41 150MH uses medium base _ED- 17 lames
150 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
150MHT6 bi -pin socket for T6 lamp
1 -0 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
175MH uses medium base ED -17 lamps. _
175 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
250MH uses mociul base ED -28 lamps.
250 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a
POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28
lamps. 120/208/240/277 volt.
WHT
White
DBZ
Dark Bronze
BLK
Black
DGN
Dark Green
MAL
ATG
Matte Aluminum
Antique Green
VGR
CRT
Verde Green
Corten
Custom and RAL colors are available at an
extra cost. Please submit a color sample or
' ,iAL color number.
200HPS uses mogul base ED -18 lamps.
200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
250HPS uses mogul base E -18 lamps. _
200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt.
All fixtures prewired for 277 volts.
MAT Cast adapter to side mount to a 2" o.d. mast
arm (by others)
RST Instant restart ballast for 150 watt or less
HPS lamp (S55).
QRS Quartz restrike controller and socket for a
T-4 mini -cand halogen lamp.
QL Socket for a T-4 mini -cared halogen lamp.
Field wired to a separate circuit.
HSS House side shield, factory installed
PSB Pulse start ballast for 250 MH, V3 or V5
only.
See the AAL catalog for a full range of
decorative bases, arms and poles.
17
PRM3
DIMENSIONS:
13" x 18" dia.
330mm x 460MM
EPA =.85
WT. =24 Les.
IP RATING= 54
PRM3 -PM
Sli,os over a 4" (100mm)
diameter pole or tenon.
MENSIONS:
f?g" x 18" dia.
tu�itvi x 460mm
EPA =.85
- 29 Las.
!: I ;;STING= 54
'" uLl
111M.E. NSIONS:
Iii"' x 22" dia
4i60r.trvi x 560MM
E:PA =1.9
WT -=45 Les.
IP RATING =54
PRM4
sv,th lightly diffused
L Ot 1
PRM4 -PM
DIMENSIONS:
40" x 22" dia
1020MM x 560MM
EPA =2.56
WT.= 49 Les.
IP RATING = 54
PRM4 -PM
r; "gh,tly diffused
,�, is
ARM OR PENDANT MOUNT POST TOP OR ARM MOUNT
CAT NO DESCRIPTION CAT NO DESCRIPTION
PRM4 V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector
PRM4 -PM V3 vertical lamp, type 3 reflector
PRM4 V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector
PRM4 -PM V5 vertical lamp, type 5 reflector
PRM4 H2 horizontal lamp, type 2 reflector
PRM4 -PM H2 horizontal lamp, type 2 reflector
PRM4 H3 horizontal lamp, type 3 reflector
PRM4 -PM H3 horizontal lamp, type 3 reflector
PRM4 H4 horizontal lamp, type 4 reflector
PRM4 -PM H4 horizontal lamp, type 4 reflector
PRM4 H5 horizontal lamp, type 5 reflector
PRM4 -PM H5 horizontal lamp, type 5 reflector
PRMD IL165 includes a 165 watt QL Induction
Lamp, electronic ballast multitap for 208, 240 or 277
volt. Includes an LDL Lens.
• •'
WHT White DBZ Dark Bronze
175MH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps.
BLK Black DGN Dark Green
175 watt metal halide multitap ballast
MAL Matte Aluminum VGR Verde Green
120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a
POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28
ATG Antique Green CRT Corten
—
lamps.
Custom and RAL colors are available at an
extra cost. Please submit a color sample or
250MH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps.
250 watt metal halide multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt. Horizontal lamp; use a
• ' •
POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28
LDL Lightly diffused lens to conceal the fixture
lamps.
interior and reduce lamp brightness.
40OMH uses mogul base ED -28 lamps.
MAT Cast adapter to side mount to a 2" o.d. mast
250 watt metal halide multitap ballast
arm (by others)
120112081240/277 volt. Honzorital lamp; use a
RST Instant restart ballast for 150 watt HPS
POMB ED -28 lamp. Vertical lamp; use ED -28
lamp (S55).
lamps.
QRS Quartz restrike controller and socket for a
150HPS uses moqul base ED -23 %'2 lamps.
T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp.
150 watt high pressure sod i�arr� multitap ballast
QL Socket for a T -4 mini -cand halogen lamp.
120;208/240/277 volt
Field wired to a separate circuit.
HSS House side shield, factory installed
200HPS uses mogul base E -18 lamps.
PSB Pulse start ballast 175, 250 or 400 MH,
200 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast
V3 and V5 reflectors only.
120/208/240/277 volt
See the AAL catalog for a full range of
250HPS uses rnogul base E -18 lamps.
decorative bases, arms and poles.
250 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
400HPS uses mogul base E -18 lamps.
400 watt high pressure sodium multitap ballast
120/208/240/277 volt
All fixtures prewired for 277 volts.
ORDERING -
FIXTURE BALLAST /LAMP ARM
POLE COLOR OPTIONS
PRM4 -PM V5 400HPS 0
DB2 -5F20 -188 DBZ LDL
2 -PRM2 H3 250HPS TRA5D
DB10 -5R20 -250 BILK 0
1A
L "J
L
G
s
Poles and Bases
4 ..."
Consult your
AAL catalog for
complete details
on weight and
load limits as
well as wind
loading
information.
:.r,:n.,J •VY ,N[�f k. � ►rRfl :..6 "zilwYS.:..' -+l .^R`� v. M��.� K :;. L. Tf••F-,sl+y`srt ti.r -.
::3 _a_r4°:.: •'#Ji.el'l wiit!`l'Y.e.,.� • .,. c .(..,.;,x!'.►._:4NRr.'i fi.4+H.i'•.SN'.. �^!+- ;t4A :9?VTG:IR!Y:!,r .vWk.•a, c�'e -.•.1: s J.- ...4'Y: f..t^..L.::.tid:Yaht ^Y�:t r
4
BC5 BC6 BC7 BC8
• 14" X 24" 12" X 17" 18" X 30" 12" X 36"
355 X 610mm 305 x 430mm 460 x 760mm 305 x 915mm
TWO PIECE TWO PIECE SPLIT BASE WITH COLLAR TWO PIECE
FOR A 4" OR 5" POLE FOR A 4" OR 5" POLE FOR A 4" OR 5" POLE FOR A 4" POLE
I. M.
BASE COVERS
Two piece base covers are cast #356
alurninum that fit over standard 4"
(102mm) or 5" (1 -05mm) round poles.
Covers are attached with stainless
steel hardware. Consult your AAL
catalog for complete details on
round poles.
Specifications
HOUSING
The entire fixture shall be cast aluminum, certified as
pure A356 alloy, free of any porosity, foreign materials or
cosmetic fillers. Castings shall be of uniform wall thick-
ness, minimum .188" with no warping or mold shifting.
The top shall hinge open by flipping up two integral
latches. The concealed latch mechanism shall be all stainless
steel. The top shall seal the lamp compartment with a full sur-
round, molded silicone gasket. The lens shall be one piece clear,
injection molded optical grade, DR acrylic, gasketed top and bot-
tom with silicone gaskets, and held in place with six clips for easy
lens replacement. The ballast assembly shall be accessible by
loosening three captive stainless steel screws, and then twist off
the ballast module. The ballast module shall be sealed from the
lamp chamber with a silicone gasket. Quick disconnects shall be
used for all electrical connections.
All internal and external hardware shall be stainless steel.
REFLECTOR MODULE
The optical assembly shall be completely sealed with a silicone
gasket to prevent dust, insect or moisture contamination. The
reflector module shall consist of segmented, specular and semi
specular AlzakO panels precisely formed and positioned within
the housing. The reflector module shall be mounted to a carrier
plate, rotatable on ninety degree increments for proper field posi-
tioning. Reflectors shall meet the ANSI -IES standard for full cutoff
reflectors.
ELECTRICAL
All electrical components shall be U.L. recognized. Ballasts shall
be high power factor rated for -300 starting. The ballast shall be
_WM2 �
.. HOUSING
The ballast housing shall be a one piece, high strength
PRM4 casting with an integral heat sink for the ballast assem-
bly. Housing shall be cast aluminum, certified as pure
A356 alloy, free of any porosity, foreign materials or cos-
metic fillers. The hood shall be spun 6061 aluminum welded
circumferentially to the ballast housing. The housing shall have an
inner rolled flange to support the door frame. The door frame
shall be an aluminum casting, hinged to the housing. The door
frame shall be sealed to the housing with a molded silicone gas-
ket and be secured with four captive screws.The lens on the
PRM2 and PRM3 shall be clear, tempered glass sealed to the
door frame with a silicone gasket. Vertical lamp fixture shall have
a sag glass lens, the horizontal lamp fixture shall have a flat glass
lens. The lens on the PRM4 shall be molded, optical grade DR
acrylic. All internal and external hardware shall be stainless steel.
REFLECTOR MODULE
The optical assembly shall consist of an outer housing of alu-
minum that is completely sealed with a silicone gasket to prevent
dust, insect or moisture contamination. The reflector module shall
consist of segmented, specular and semi - specular Alzak• panels
precisely formed and positioned within the housing. The reflector
module shall be rotatable on ninety degree increments for prop-
er field positioning. Reflectors shall meet the ANSI -IES standard
for full cutoff reflectors.
ELECTRICAL
All electrical components shall be U.L. recognized. Ballasts shall
be high power factor rated for -300 starting. The ballast assem-
bly plate shall be mounted to the cast housing for maximum heat
dissipation. Mogul base porcelain sockets shall be pulse rated.
mounted to a cast holder for maximum heat dissipation. Medium
base, (mogul base for 200 and 250 watt lamps) porcelain sock-
ets shall be pulse rated. The electrical assembly shall be installed
and prewired in the fixture. Sockets for T-6 lamps are G12 type.
CERTIFICATION
Fixtures shall be listed with ETL for outdoor, wet location use,
UL 1570 &1572 and Canadian CSA C22.2 no.9. IP = 54
MOUNTING
Post top mounting: the fixture shall slip over a four inch O.D.
pole and be secured to the pole with three stainless steel set
screws.
Arm or wall mounting PRMS & PRMN: The fixture shall be weld-
ed to the cast arm.
Arm or wall mounting PRMD: The fixture shall attach to a tran-
sition casting that is welded to the arm. The transition piece shall
attach to the fixture with six stainless steel 1/4-20 bolts and
sealed with a silicone gasket.
FINISH
Fixture finish shall consist of a five stage pretreatment regimen
with a polymer primer sealer, oven dry off and top coated with a
thermoset super TGIC polyester powder coat finish. The finish
shall meet the AAMA 605.2 performance specification which
includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray test for corrosion resis-
tance.
RELAMPING
The top of the fixture shall hinge open for relamping. Two inte-
gral latches shall be flipped up to open the fixture for relamping.
Sockets for horizontal metal halide lamps are pin orientated and
include a lamp stabilizer. The ballast assembly shall be installed
and prewired in the fixture.
CERTIFICATION
Fixtures shall be listed with ETL for outdoor, wet location use,
UL 1570 &1572 and Canadian CSA C22.2 no.9. IP = 54
MOUNTING
The fixture shall be welded to the cast arm for mounting the
TRA5 and TRA 6 arm.
Wall mounting the WMA35 or WMA36: the fixture shall be weld-
ed to the cast arm.
Arm or wall mounting other AAL arms: The fixture shall attach
to a transition casting that is welded to the arm. The transition
piece shall attach to the fixture with three stainless steel 1/4-20
bolts and sealed with a silicone gasket.
Post top fitter: the cast fitter shall be welded to the yoke and slip
a four inch od pole - PRM3 or a five inch od pole - PRM2 & PRM4
and secured with six stainless steel set screws.
FINISH
Fixture finish shall consist of a five stage pretreatment regimen
with a polymer primer sealer, oven dry off and top coated with a
thermoset super TGIC polyester powder coat finish. The finish
shall meet the AAMA 605.2 performance specification which
includes passing a 3000 hour salt spray test for corrosion resis-
tance.
RELAMPING
The lens door frame of the fixture shall hinge down for relamp-
ing. Four captive screws shall be loosened to open the fixture for
relamping (PRM2 & PRM4). One captive screw shall be loosened
to open the fixture on the PRM3.
WARRANTY
Fixtures shall carry a limited warranty of three years. Ballast components shall carry the ballast manufacturer's limited
warranty. AAL products are proudly made in the U.S.A. of 100% U.S.A. content materials.
20
LAJ
is
4
0
s
Wall Mounting Options
The Promenade fixtures are available on most AAL
wall brackets. Pole mounted versions of these and
other wall brackets insure design continuity for all the
outdoor site lighting. Consult your AAL catalog for a
complete selection of wall and pole mounted arms.
Mounting hardware is not included.
20"
ri 1 nm m
Im
WMA JOU
Wall plate is 8" x 14" (200 mm x 360 mm)
WMA 39
Wall plate is 8" x 26" (200 mm x 660 mm)
n
21
(_ 21"
535mm
13"
Omm
I-
WMA 55
Wall plate is 8" x 26" (200 mm x 660 mm)
L•i rIuui
WMA 37
Wall plate is 8" x 26" (200 mm x 660 mm)
20"
51 Omm
WMA 4
Wall plate is 8" x 26" (200 mm x 660 mm)
M
LAMP TYPE
LUMENS
V CONVERSION FACTOR
70 MH, clear E -17
5200
.33
100 MH, clear E -17
8500
.53
175 MH, clear E -17
14000
.88
250 MH, clear E -28
22000
1.38
70 HPS, clear E -17
6400
.40
100 HPS, clear E -17
9500
.59
150 HPS, clear E -17
16000
1.00
250 HPS, clear E -28
27500
1.52
NOTE: If using a lamp with different lumen output than listed above, consult
AAL for conversion factor.
PRMN QL
10' 12' 14' 16'
0 2.00 1.38 1.02 .78
1.00 .69 .51 .39
r
F .50 .35 .26 .20
Cn
.20 .14 .10 .08
10' MOUNTING HEIGHT
one grid square equals
one mounting height
0 1 2 3 4 5
PRMN V3 LDL 150HPS E -17
14' MOUNTING HEIGHT
one grid square equals
one mounting height
12' 14' 16' 18'
0
~ 2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20
w
cc 1.36 1.00 .77 .60
.68 .50 .39 .30
.27 .20 .15 .12
Wool. �
I a 0
M
I UL
M
ME
I=,
MENGE
OEM
=NONE
WE
N
MI.A
MEN
ME
No
0
MM.M
BE.EENE1
,
01
1 2 3 4 5 6
PRMN V5 LDL 150HPS E -17
12' 14' 16' 18'
w - - --
2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20
1.36 1.00 .77 .60
.68 .50 .39 .30
.27 .20 .15 .12
14' MOUNTING HEIGHT
one grid square equals
one mounting height
The values below are in initial footcandles. Discount values
to account for light losses due to voltage, temperature and
atmospheric variations which affect light output.
To substitute another lamp in the isocandle charts below,
multiply the chart values by the lamp conversion factor on the
left. Mounting height is to the lamp center.
Al testing performed by a certified independent laboratory.
Photometry is available in IES formatted files on CD -Rom and
our website at www.aal.net or call your local AAL representative.
PRMS H3 150HPS E -17
14' MOUNTING HEIGHT
one grid square equals
one mounting height
12' 14' 16' 18'
W
r 6.80 5.00 3.85 3.00
Cr 2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20
1.36 1.00 .77 .60
.68 .50 .39 .30
.27 .20 .15 .12
1 2 3 4 5 6
PRMS V3 150HPS E -28
14' MOUNTING HEIGHT
one grid square equals
one mounting height
12' 14' 16' 18'
W
6.80 5.00 3.85 3.00
Q2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20
i 1.36 1.00 .77 .60
.68 .50 .39 .30
.27 .20 .15 .12
1 2 3 4 5 6
PRMS V5 150HPS E -28
12' 14' 16'- 18'
I
0 6.80 5.00 3.85 3.00
U)
w 2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20
cr
1.36 1.00 .77 .60
.68 .50 .39 .30
.27 .20 .15 .12
14' MOUNTING HEIGHT
one grid square equals
one mounting height
0 1 2 3 4 5
E
ME
0
Mimi
OEM
WE
MM.M
01
1 2 3 4 5 6
PRMS V3 150HPS E -28
14' MOUNTING HEIGHT
one grid square equals
one mounting height
12' 14' 16' 18'
W
6.80 5.00 3.85 3.00
Q2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20
i 1.36 1.00 .77 .60
.68 .50 .39 .30
.27 .20 .15 .12
1 2 3 4 5 6
PRMS V5 150HPS E -28
12' 14' 16'- 18'
I
0 6.80 5.00 3.85 3.00
U)
w 2.72 2.00 1.54 1.20
cr
1.36 1.00 .77 .60
.68 .50 .39 .30
.27 .20 .15 .12
14' MOUNTING HEIGHT
one grid square equals
one mounting height
0 1 2 3 4 5
E
ME
0
Mimi
OEM
WE
1 2 3 4 5 6
- 0
LAMP TYPE
LUMENS
V CONVERSION FACTOR
100 MH, clear E -28
7800
.27 (Venture lamp #67868)
175 MH, clear E -28
14000
.48
250 MH, clear E -28
23000
.83 pin oriented lamp
kir 400 MH, clear E -28
39000
1.40 pin oriented lamp
100 HPS, clear E -17
9500
.33
150 HPS, clear E -17
16000
.55
250 HPS, clear E -18
28000
1.00
400 HPS, clear E -18
50000
1.72
NOTE: If using a lamp with different lumen output than listed above, consult
AAL for conversion factor.
PRM2 H2 250HPS E -28
16' MOUNTING HEIGHT
one grid square equals
one mounting height
14' 16' 18' 20'
W 6.55 5.00 3.95 3.20
0 2.62 2.00 1.58 1.24
1.31 1.00 .79 .64
.66 .50 .40 .32
.26 .20 .16 .13
1 2 3 4 5 6
PRM2 H3 250HPS E -28
16' MOUNTING HEIGHT
one grid square equals
one mounting height
14' 16' 18' 20'
w
w 6.55 5.00 3.95 3.20
LU
cc
2.62 2.00 1.58 1.24
1.31 1.00 .79 .64
.66 .50 .40 .32
.26 .20 .16 .13
1 2 3 4 5 6
PRM2 H4 250HPS E -28
16' MOUNTING HEIGHT
one grid square equals
one mounting height
14' 16' 18' 20'
0
ENE
EN
6.55 5.00
3.95
1
1.MM
1
No
1.24
EMEM01
1.31 1.00
.79
.64
.66 .50
.40
.32
.26 .20
.16
.13
■1
ME
0
MENNEN
ME-NONNI
in
1 2 3 4 5 6
PRM2 H4 250HPS E -28
16' MOUNTING HEIGHT
one grid square equals
one mounting height
14' 16' 18' 20'
0
EN
6.55 5.00
3.95
3.20
cc
2.62 2.00
1.58
1.24
EMEM01
1.31 1.00
.79
.64
.66 .50
.40
.32
.26 .20
.16
.13
1 2 3 4 5 6
23
The values below are in initial footcandles. Discount values
to account for light losses due to voltage, temperature and
atmospheric variations which affect light output.
To substitute another lamp in the isocandle charts below,
multiply the chart values by the lamp conversion factor on the
left. Mounting height is to the lamp center.
All testing performed by a certified independent laboratory.
Photometry is available in IES formatted files on CD -Rom and
our website at www.aal.net or call your local AAL representative.
PRM2 H5 250HPS E -28
16' MOUNTING HEIGHT
14' 16' 18' 20'
W
6.55 5.00 3.95 3.20
W2.62 2.00 1.58 1.24
1.31 1.00 .79 .64
66 .50 .40 .32
26 .20 .16 .13
1 2 3 4 5 6
PRM2 V3 250HPS E -28
16' MOUNTING HEIGHT
one grid square equals
one mounting height
14' 16' 18' 20'
LU
Fn 6.55 5.00 3.95 3.20
�Wj 2.62 2.00 1.58 1.24
Q
1.31 1.00 .79 .64
.66 .50 .40 .32
.26 .20 .16 .13
EN
lick
EMEM01
mom
EN
■1
1 2 3 4 5 6
23
The values below are in initial footcandles. Discount values
to account for light losses due to voltage, temperature and
atmospheric variations which affect light output.
To substitute another lamp in the isocandle charts below,
multiply the chart values by the lamp conversion factor on the
left. Mounting height is to the lamp center.
All testing performed by a certified independent laboratory.
Photometry is available in IES formatted files on CD -Rom and
our website at www.aal.net or call your local AAL representative.
PRM2 H5 250HPS E -28
16' MOUNTING HEIGHT
14' 16' 18' 20'
W
6.55 5.00 3.95 3.20
W2.62 2.00 1.58 1.24
1.31 1.00 .79 .64
66 .50 .40 .32
26 .20 .16 .13
1 2 3 4 5 6
PRM2 V3 250HPS E -28
16' MOUNTING HEIGHT
one grid square equals
one mounting height
14' 16' 18' 20'
LU
Fn 6.55 5.00 3.95 3.20
�Wj 2.62 2.00 1.58 1.24
Q
1.31 1.00 .79 .64
.66 .50 .40 .32
.26 .20 .16 .13
1 2 3 4 5 6
PRM2 V5 250HPS E -28
14' 16' 18' 20'
LU
° 6.55 5.00 3.95 3.20
tTU
Uj 2.62 2.00 1.58 1.24
1.31 1.00 .79 .64
.66 .50 .40 .32
.26 .20 .16 .13
16' MOUNTING HEIGHT
one grid square equals
one mounting height
0161MEMM
EN
lick
EMEM01
mom
EN
Oam
■
1 2 3 4 5 6
PRM2 V5 250HPS E -28
14' 16' 18' 20'
LU
° 6.55 5.00 3.95 3.20
tTU
Uj 2.62 2.00 1.58 1.24
1.31 1.00 .79 .64
.66 .50 .40 .32
.26 .20 .16 .13
16' MOUNTING HEIGHT
one grid square equals
one mounting height
0161MEMM
MEMEM
EMEM01
mom
EN
1 2 3 4 5 6
•
•
•
.9
A
A
L
MADE IN U.S.A.
7